Access level modifier Internal

hi,
as3 has 2 new access level modifiers "Internal and
"Protected" can anyone tell me the use of this and how it varies
from "Public" and "Private " modifiers?
Thank You

Internal: Specifies that a class, variable, constant or
function is available to any caller within the same package.
Protected: Specifies that a variable, constant, method, or
namespace is available only to the class that defines it and to any
subclasses of that class.
You will find this information in the online Language
Reference:
http://livedocs.macromedia.com/flex/2/langref/index.html
and then under 'Language Elements' -> Statements, keywords and
directives

Similar Messages

Access level with no modifier

Hello
Hello
I read in Access Level in
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/java/javaOO/accesscontrol.html
and know that I cannot access "no modifier" from a subclass. So I try
public class Exam {
String myString; //no modifier keyword
public class Exam1 extends Exam{
void setMyString(){
myString="test";
There is no compile error. It can be seen that I can access "myString" of super class Exam from subclass.
Could you please tell me why
Thanks

Because those two classes are in the same package (In your case, that means in the same folder). The access level "with no modifier" is called the default access level or "package private".

How to change lookup code with Access Level as 'System'

Hi,
I need to append new lookup codes in a lookup type having access level as 'SYSTEM'. Is there any standard way to do the same or just updating the customization level column will do ? Please let me know if you have any solution for this.
Regards
Girish

You can also change the meaning on that value to something like "*** DO NOT USE***". This will make it obvious to the user that he/she should not choose it.
You can try to add a when-validate-record personalization to show error if someone selected a disabled value.
You can also try to modify the list of values associated with the field using personalizations.
If nothing else works, you can use a SQL to uncheck the enabled flag. The risks involved in this are well known.
Hope this answers your question
Sandeep Gandhi
Independent Consultant
513-325-9026

Unable to access vpn box internal address after vpn

Hi all. My office network is protected by asa5510 firewall with vpn configured. When i vpn into my office network i could not access the firewall via the firewall's internal address using telnet etc even though i have already enable telnet. The firewall is my office network gateway. Below is my config. Pls advise. Thks in advance. Access to my office network is fine using vpn.
hostname firewall
domain-name default.domain.invalid
enable password xxx
names
dns-guard
interface Ethernet0/0
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.1x.x 255.255.255.0
interface Ethernet0/1
nameif DMZ
security-level 50
ip address 192.168.2x.x 255.255.255.0
interface Ethernet0/2
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address 8x.x.x.x 255.255.255.240
interface Ethernet0/3
shutdown
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface Management0/0
nameif management
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
management-only
passwd xxx
ftp mode passive
same-security-traffic permit inter-interface
access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip 192.168.1x.0 255.255.255.0 any
access-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any any
access-list outside_access_in extended deny ip any any
access-list DMZ_access_in extended permit ip 192.168.2x.0 255.255.255.0 any
access-list inside_nat0_outbound extended permit ip any 172.16.0.0 255.255.255.224
access-list split-tunnel standard permit 192.168.1x.0 255.255.255.0
pager lines 24
logging enable
logging asdm-buffer-size 500
logging asdm informational
mtu inside 1500
mtu DMZ 1500
mtu outside 1500
mtu management 1500
ip local pool addpool 172.16.0.1-172.16.0.20 mask 255.255.0.0
no failover
monitor-interface inside
monitor-interface DMZ
monitor-interface outside
monitor-interface management
asdm image disk0:/asdm-507.bin
no asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
nat-control
global (outside) 100 interface
nat (inside) 0 access-list inside_nat0_outbound
nat (inside) 100 192.168.1x.0 255.255.255.0
access-group inside_access_in in interface inside
access-group DMZ_access_in in interface DMZ
access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 8x.x.x.x 1
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00
timeout mgcp-pat 0:05:00 sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00
timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute
group-policy vpn internal
group-policy vpn attributes
dns-server value 192.168.1x.x 192.168.1x.x
split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
split-tunnel-network-list value split-tunnel
webvpn
username ciscoadm password xxx encrypted privilege 15
username ciscoadm attributes
vpn-group-policy vpn
webvpn
http server enable
http 192.168.1x.x 255.255.255.255 inside
http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 management
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart
sysopt connection tcpmss 13800
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 20 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA
crypto map outside_map 65535 ipsec-isakmp dynamic outside_dyn_map
crypto map outside_map interface outside
isakmp enable outside
isakmp policy 10 authentication pre-share
isakmp policy 10 encryption 3des
isakmp policy 10 hash sha
isakmp policy 10 group 2
isakmp policy 10 lifetime 86400
tunnel-group vpn type ipsec-ra
tunnel-group vpn general-attributes
address-pool addpool
default-group-policy vpn
tunnel-group vpn ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *
telnet 192.168.1x.x 255.255.255.0 inside
telnet timeout 5
ssh timeout 5
console timeout 0

Hi all. Below is my configuration. After i enable "management-access inside" i could access my firewall internal ip via ping after establishing vpn connection but not others like telnet even though "telnet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside" is enabled. Pls advise.
interface Ethernet0/0
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.1x.254 255.255.255.0
interface Ethernet0/1
nameif DMZ
security-level 50
ip address 192.168.2x.254 255.255.255.0
interface Ethernet0/2
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address 8x.xx.xx.xx 255.255.255.240
interface Ethernet0/3
shutdown
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface Management0/0
nameif management
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
management-only
passwd xxx
ftp mode passive
same-security-traffic permit inter-interface
access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip 192.168.1x.0 255.255.255.0 any
access-list inside_access_in extended permit esp any any
access-list inside_access_in extended permit gre any any
access-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any any
access-list outside_access_in extended deny ip any any
access-list DMZ_access_in extended permit ip 192.168.2x.0 255.255.255.0 any
access-list inside_nat0_outbound extended permit ip any 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0
access-list split-tunnel standard permit 192.168.1x.0 255.255.255.0
access-list prod standard permit host 192.168.1x.x
access-list prod standard deny any
pager lines 24
logging enable
logging asdm-buffer-size 500
logging asdm informational
mtu inside 1500
mtu DMZ 1500
mtu outside 1500
mtu management 1500
ip local pool pool 172.16.0.1-172.16.0.20 mask 255.255.0.0
no failover
monitor-interface inside
monitor-interface DMZ
monitor-interface outside
monitor-interface management
asdm image disk0:/asdm-507.bin
no asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
nat-control
global (outside) 100 interface
nat (inside) 0 access-list inside_nat0_outbound
nat (inside) 100 192.168.1x.0 255.255.255.0
access-group inside_access_in in interface inside
access-group DMZ_access_in in interface DMZ
access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 8x.xx.xx.xx 1
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00
timeout mgcp-pat 0:05:00 sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00
timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute
group-policy vpnuser internal
group-policy vpnuser attributes
dns-server value 192.168.1x.x 192.168.1x.x
split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
split-tunnel-network-list value prod
default-domain value mm.com
webvpn
username user password xxx encrypted privilege 15
username user attributes
vpn-group-policy vpnuser
webvpn
http server enable
http 192.168.1x.x 255.255.255.255 inside
http 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside
http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 management
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart
sysopt connection tcpmss 13800
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 20 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA
crypto map outside_map 65535 ipsec-isakmp dynamic outside_dyn_map
crypto map outside_map interface outside
isakmp enable outside
isakmp policy 10 authentication pre-share
isakmp policy 10 encryption 3des
isakmp policy 10 hash sha
isakmp policy 10 group 2
isakmp policy 10 lifetime 86400
tunnel-group vpnuser type ipsec-ra
tunnel-group vpnuser general-attributes
address-pool pool
default-group-policy vpnuser
tunnel-group vpnuser ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *
telnet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside
telnet timeout 5
ssh timeout 5
console timeout 0
management-access inside
dhcpd address 192.168.1.2-192.168.1.254 management
dhcpd dns 8x.x.1x.x 8x.x.x.x
dhcpd lease 3600
dhcpd ping_timeout 50
dhcpd enable management

Need access levels to access database

hi ,
i am doing project with jsp in ms-access database. this webapplication should be accessible to 10 people. all should be view the data but levels should be there.how can i get the access levels to the database like reading access to some 2 people. writing and modifying access to some 5 people.inserting can be done by other 2 people . please give the solution for this. i have netbeans4.1 ide , and tomcat bundled server.
so, kindly give the jsp code and msaccess solution.
thanks .

I am not informed if the ms-access DB supports SQL-92. In that case you should be able to define the users and set the rules using GRANT sql command. So it is more or less an off topic entry here for a java forum.
Else if you try to implement the authoization business logic out of your DB domain in java (or C or whatever), it is no more coupled with the DB and most likely that is not what you are supposed to deliver.

Custom Access Level issue in XI 3.1

Hi,
I am using BOXI 3.1 with fp 1.5, this configuration is migrated from XI3.0.
Earlier we have access level such that user can modify the webi report in folders but they can't overwrite the report, they can save the report in their personal folder but not in same folder or any folder under public folder.
After migration users can't see the modify option at all, and if i gave then edit object rights then they can see the modify option but they can overwrite at the same time.
Is there any other rights which i need to provide.
Thanks for the help/suggestion.

Hi Marianne,
I have given the same rights in general rights section, i have denied to add objects to folder but i have give the copy objects rights due to which they can copy the report to their personal folder due to that they got overwritting the report rights.
Thanks.

Multiple Access Levels per User

In a site I'm building, I need the ability to allow an administrator to intuitively assign different access levels to different users. There may ultimately be roughly 25 different pages to which a user may be granted access. One user may have access to section/page levels 1, 4, 5, 7 and 21. Another user may get access to 2, 3, 4, 17, 19 and 24, etc. While this is possible under the existing ADDT user login system by creating a separate access value that includes only the permissible pages (access level 1 could get to page 1, 4, 5, 7 and 21; access level 2 could only get to pages 2, 3, 4, 17, 19 and 24) it becomes impractical for the administrator since the developer (me) would have to come up with an access value and corresponding permissible pages for every possible combination. Every time a new combination was needed, my client would have to contact me to add that access integer and modify all the corresponding sections/pages that the user could access.
The ideal solution IMHO in this scenario would be for the administrator to simply be able to select or deselect a checkbox at will for each page to which the user is granted access (this is actually the scenario to which another of my feature request post refers:
http://www.adobeforums.com/webx/.59b75119
In searching the old InterAKT forums, I came across a post in which this exact scenario was requested. The user and Ionut came up with a solution which I was able to modify to enable the system I describe above. Rather than repeating the solution, here is a link to that post:
http://www.interaktonline.com/Products/Dreamweaver-Extensions/MXUserLogin/Product-Forum/De tails/110205/Access+level+based+on+pages.html
While it appears this solution will work for me, it took me quite a while to find it, and even longer to understand it.
So, that's my feature request: The ability for an administrator to easily assign any combination of pages to which a user is granted access, preferably with a set of checkboxes.
Thanks!

This is functioning now. With 9.0 you simply use a forward slash between device IDs.
[device ID #1]/[device ID #2]
Put this information in the "Mobile Device ID" field on the user form.
It also has been verified with 8.82 PL15-16, but I don't know how far back it goes.

"Orphaned" rights in an access level?

Odd one here. I query for an access level (SI_KIND = 'CustomRole'), then iterate through the Role Rights collection. I am finding some rights included that are not shown on the Access Levels screens in the XI 3.x CMC. Specifically, entries with an .ApplicableKind of "Federation" and .Kind of "QaaWS" and "MetaData.MetaDataRepositoryInfo".
To try it for yourself, make a copy of any of the built-in roles, then in the CMC set EVERY right to not specified. The CMC will show absolutely no rights in the access level at all. YET, with the SDK you will still see the rights I mentioned before included. In one case, I have built a custom access level by cloning an existing one, and can find no way to remove these "orphaned" rights via CMC.
So two questions I guess. What are these and are they somehow important (or just "leftovers" from development stuff)? If they can't be removed via the CMC interface, I would like to remove them from my custom access level via SDK, yet I can't find a method there either. Am I missing something?
FYI, Enterprise COM SDK if that matters.

In the CMC, only those rights that are configurable (i.e., public) are displayed.
Some are hidden, since they're not public - the ones you're looking at are, I think, internal ones.
By the way, Enterprise COM SDK was deprecated with XI Release 2, and no longer supported for XI 3.
Some internal stuff uses the Enterprise COM SDK still, but no guarantees that it's not going to disappear some day in XI 3.x
Sincerely,
Ted Ueda

Access Level Management for Lync2013

In Microsoft Communicator 2007, there was an option to set the 'Access Level Management' as a global setting. Is this feature still available in Lync 2013 apart from setting the 'Access Levels' for each contact individually.
Since we migrated from Microsoft Communicator 2007 to Lync2013 and we needed to change some 'Access Levels', I wasn't able to do so. So would like to check if this feature can be enabled or disabled at the global level.
Thanks. Any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
BR,
Frieda

Hi,
In Lync 2013, you can view the contact in turn of Relationship as following:
You can modify the relationship of the contact by right click the contact, and choose "Change Privacy Relationship", then you can choose the relationship you want such as Workgroup, Blocked Contacts.
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support

Access level - unknown rights

Hi,
I was trying to create customer access level in CMS, but when I tried include some rights into it, I failed because in the name field of many rights I see "Unknown right", so I don´t know which right is for what.
for example
Collection Type Right Name
Application CMC Unknown right
General General Unknown right
The same it is in predefined access levels Full Control, View, Schedule... there is a lot of rights with name "Unknown right" only few of them are filled with correct name. I was thinking it´s some king of bug or language problem.
Version of my BOE instalation is 12.3.0.601.
Any help is welcomed.

Thanks for really quick respond.
I tryed this solution about two days before, but it didn´t work for me. I´m located in Slovakia, so I was also trying to change language to English in internet explorer and on machine where the BOE is installed but it didn´t help. BOE was installed in English.
I have also another problem with access levels. When I create new access level and pres button Add/Remove rights it give me this error. Maybe the cause is the same in both this issues, maybe it´s absolutely diffiren problem.
Exception report
message
description The server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request.
exception
org.apache.jasper.JasperException
+     org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.handleJspException(JspServletWrapper.java:512)+
+     org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:395)+
+     org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:314)+
+     org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:264)+
+     javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802)+
+     com.sun.faces.context.ExternalContextImpl.dispatch(ExternalContextImpl.java:346)+
+     com.sun.faces.application.ViewHandlerImpl.renderView(ViewHandlerImpl.java:152)+
+     com.sun.faces.lifecycle.RenderResponsePhase.execute(RenderResponsePhase.java:107)+
+     com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.phase(LifecycleImpl.java:245)+
+     com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.render(LifecycleImpl.java:137)+
+     javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:214)+
+     com.businessobjects.webutil.boetrustguard.BOETrustedRequestCreator.doFilter(BOETrustedRequestCreator.java:96)+
+     com.businessobjects.webutil.boetrustguard.BOETrustFilter.doFilter(BOETrustFilter.java:83)+
+     com.businessobjects.webutil.TimeoutCheckerFilter.doFilter(TimeoutCheckerFilter.java:99)+
root cause
java.lang.NullPointerException
+     com.businessobjects.clientaction.customrole.includedrights.IncludedRightsBean.initRightsForSelectedPlugin(IncludedRightsBean.java:212)+
+     org.apache.jsp.jsp.CustomRole_005fIncludedRights.rights_jsp._jspService(rights_jsp.java:148)+
+     org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:97)+
+     javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802)+
+     org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:334)+
+     org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:314)+
+     org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:264)+
+     javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802)+
+     com.sun.faces.context.ExternalContextImpl.dispatch(ExternalContextImpl.java:346)+
+     com.sun.faces.application.ViewHandlerImpl.renderView(ViewHandlerImpl.java:152)+
+     com.sun.faces.lifecycle.RenderResponsePhase.execute(RenderResponsePhase.java:107)+
+     com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.phase(LifecycleImpl.java:245)+
+     com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.render(LifecycleImpl.java:137)+
+     javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:214)+
+     com.businessobjects.webutil.boetrustguard.BOETrustedRequestCreator.doFilter(BOETrustedRequestCreator.java:96)+
+     com.businessobjects.webutil.boetrustguard.BOETrustFilter.doFilter(BOETrustFilter.java:83)+
+     com.businessobjects.webutil.TimeoutCheckerFilter.doFilter(TimeoutCheckerFilter.java:99)+
note The full stack trace of the root cause is available in the Apache Tomcat/5.5.20 logs.

TFS - Access Level - page not found when trying to add user

When I'm trying to modify some group under Limited Access Level I cannot do that because of the following error:
Page not found.
wrapErrorCallback/</<@server/tfs/_static/tfs/12/_scripts/TFS/debug/Presentation/Scripts/TFS/TFS.Core.Ajax.js:175:37
endRequest@server/tfs/_static/tfs/12/_scripts/TFS/debug/Presentation/Scripts/TFS/TFS.Core.Ajax.js:114:17
wrapErrorCallback/<@server/tfs/_static/tfs/12/_scripts/TFS/debug/Presentation/Scripts/TFS/TFS.Core.Ajax.js:141:1
jQuery.Callbacks/fire@server/tfs/_static/3rdParty/_scripts/jquery-1.8.3.js:984:10
jQuery.Callbacks/self.fireWith@server/tfs/_static/3rdParty/_scripts/jquery-1.8.3.js:1094:7
done@server/tfs/_static/3rdParty/_scripts/jquery-1.8.3.js:7815:1
.send/callback@server/tfs/_static/3rdParty/_scripts/jquery-1.8.3.js:8528:8
Any ideas why it happens?
Environment: Windows Server 2012 with latest updates, TFS 2013.4, user which is used for TFS is a member of local administrators group.

Hi Rybak,
Thanks for your reply.
Try to clean the Cache for TFS 2013 manually(delete the content of the folder only, not the cache folder itself):
Clean the Cache folder on Server machine. The folder path is:
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Team Foundation Server 12.0\Application Tier\Web Services\_tfs_data.
After cleaned, on Server machine, click Start and select
Run… to open the dialog box, then input iisreset.exe and click OK, wait it run completely.
If clean Cache cannot resolve this issue, please try to repair your TFS 2013 Update 4 Server, then check the result.
Additionally, you can run TFS 2013 Power Tools BPA to scan the installation of your TFS Server.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Access Level - LOV

Hi Everybody
Can any one tell what does the below 'Access Level' mean. I came across this in 'Resource Group' creation form.
1. User
2. Extensible
3. System
Raffath

Hello Raffath,
In BOM module, Resource group is defined as a lookup code.
Access level is a field which defines how a lookup can be modify :
- System : lookup values can not be changed, no value can be added.
- Extensible : user can add new value but not change predefined lookup values
- User means that you can create, modify, or remove value in your lookup.

QaaWS Access Level

All,
I am setting up access level for users in the production environment for QaaWS tool. All users can view QaaWS in production, but they CAN'T create/modify/delete QaaWS in production. What access level do I need to enable this?
I tried to use the "View" access level out-of-the box, but I got this "You are not authorized to design or edit a query. Please contact your administrator (QWS 02718)." If I use "Full Control" access level, the user can login fine, but the issue is that user can create/modify/delete QaaWS in production. I am puzzled as to what access level can give me the view ability...
Please advise...
thanks...

qaaws is a query tool designed for editing wsdl's. If you grant view that is most likley for infoview not for opening with the client. So I believe this is by design. If you do not get anyone to verify this then I'd suggest opening a case with support admin team so they can test it and verify that for you.
Regards,
Tim

Modifying Internal Orders

Hi,
I was wondering if there was a BAPI for modifying internal orders. Specifically appropriations as done in KO02. I'm access this from the .Net connector though that may not make any difference. Thanks in advance.

Hi Aaron,
Try these
<b>BAPI_INTERNALORDER_CREATE</b> Create Internal Order From Transferred Data
BAPI_INTERNALORDER_GETDETAIL Display master data, status, and allowed business trans.for internal
BAPI_INTERNALORDER_GETLIST Display list of internal orders according to various criteria
Regards
Aneesh.

Project setup-Access Level

Dear Dina,
In Project setup in project management , access level denotes what,i can c 2 choices Enterprise,Secured....pls help me to understand.
Thanks a lot in advance.

Hi
Here is what I was able to find in Project Fundation User Guide, page 13-5
* Secured: Indicates that the project is secured. The project can be viewed only
by users with either secured or unsecured roles on the project and by users with
organization authority roles. Users with responsibilities that give them view all
projects or update all projects access can also access secured projects.
* Enterprise: Indicates that the project can be viewed by any user in your
enterprise, regardless of their role, responsibility, project assignment, or organization
authority. A guest role menu determines what enterprise project information users
can view. Your implementation team can modify the guest role menu to increase or
decrease the amount of access users have to enterprise project functions.
Dina

Access level modifier Internal

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for