Access Planning layout by multiple users

Hi Experts,
I am using IP in my current Proj, i am facing a scenario where in users need to access the same layout for a given set of objects. . where in the users know what they have to forecast.
Ex scenario:
Material        region   KF
x                   TN       100
y                   CA      200
z                   NY      300
say we have three users each know which material they have to forecast, and all the three want to access the same layout in edit mode.
Appriciate your valuble suggestions to achieve this.
Thanks,
HVR

HI Harshavardhan,
The Locks in Planning works in such a way that if we a given selection is queried into the data base, then all the records for the selection is locked.
Since you have a single layout (Query) Accessing the data for all materials, then all the materials will be locked (provided material is maintained for locking) for the given user. Hence other users cannot logon tot he same layout in Edit mode.
The Possible option is enable a material variable so that he can see / Plan only the materials he wants to Plan.
If the user wanted to see other material, then it is better to give them a desperate Query(not Input Ready) to display the data.
Hope this helps.
Regards.
Shafi.

Similar Messages

HT4865 if i want to give access to documents to multiple users more than 20 can it be done in icloud

If i buy the storage space in icloud and give access to documents for multiple users more than 20 userids will it be possible to sync whatever changes i made to the documents will get updated in those multiple accounts when the client software is installed in their systems.

What documents specifically?

Service/Plan to Add multiple users to OrgUnits

How to update OU members in CCP 9.3.2 by using Services ? Is there any way to use Rex ? What Transformation format should I use?

Hi Lee,
"Add Organization Technical Administrator" service is using REX Add Person agents which will update "Organizations" attribute for one user, but what I need is to populate "Organizations" attribute of multiple users with multiple OrgUnits or the other way, adding multiple users as a member of one or multiple OrgUnits.

Apply user layout settings for multiple users

Hi,
Does any of you know how to apply a saved user layout (like Pivot sorting, hidden key figures, etc) to multiple users? It is strange that you can create such saved layouts for eg Alert Monitor, but not for Interactive Planning... I have designed a special layout for my users but cant distribute it centrally now
Thanks in advance,
Best regards,

Hi,
You can't apply user settings of planning book to multiple users at a time.But in transacton /SAPAPO/SDPUSET you can copy these user settings to other users.
Regards,
Sunitha

Retreive the values from a user Input Popup before planning layout

Hi all,
The user run a planning layout and is coming the popup where he can choose :
Cost Center
Currency .
Is there any function module between executing the popup and showing the layout.
I have to create a function module to check the entries of the users.
Regards

Frank,
There are multiple ways to ensure that the values entered by the users are valid. A few of them are:
1. Restrict values for users with in SEM planning area.
2. Write custom code to restrict values in dropdown list.
3. Another way of doing it is by using two sets of variables. One for input by users and the other for passing the values in the planning level. The user would enter a value, the code for passing the value to the planning level, would check the data entered and then either pop up an error message or refresh the layout with the data.
As mentioned, the approach would depend on the specfic need and the design of the planning application.
Sunil

Multiple users accessing the same data in a global temp table

I have a global temp table (GTT) defined with 'on commit preserve rows'. This table is accessed via a web page using ASP.NET. The application was designed so that every one that accessed the web page could only see their data in the GTT.
We have just realized that the GTT doesn't appear to be empty as new web users use the application. I believe it has something to do with how ASP is connecting to the database. I only see one entry in the V$SESSION view even when multiple users are using the web page. I believe this single V$SESSION entry is causing only one GTT to be available at a time. Each user is inserting into / selecting out of the same GTT and their results are wrong.
I'm the back end Oracle developer at this place and I'm having difficulty translating this issue to the front end ASP team. When this web page is accessed, I need it to start a new session, not reuse an existing session. I want to keep the same connection, but just start a new session... Now I'm losing it.. Like I said, I'm the back end guy and all this web/connection/pooling front end stuff is magic to me.
The GTT isn't going to work unless we get new sessions. How do we do this?
Thanks!

DGS wrote:
I have a global temp table (GTT) defined with 'on commit preserve rows'. This table is accessed via a web page using ASP.NET. The application was designed so that every one that accessed the web page could only see their data in the GTT.
We have just realized that the GTT doesn't appear to be empty as new web users use the application. I believe it has something to do with how ASP is connecting to the database. I only see one entry in the V$SESSION view even when multiple users are using the web page. I believe this single V$SESSION entry is causing only one GTT to be available at a time. Each user is inserting into / selecting out of the same GTT and their results are wrong.
I'm the back end Oracle developer at this place and I'm having difficulty translating this issue to the front end ASP team. When this web page is accessed, I need it to start a new session, not reuse an existing session. I want to keep the same connection, but just start a new session... Now I'm losing it.. Like I said, I'm the back end guy and all this web/connection/pooling front end stuff is magic to me.
The GTT isn't going to work unless we get new sessions. How do we do this?
Thanks!You may want to try changing your GTT to 'ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS' and have the .Net app use a transaction object.
We had a similar problem and I found help in the following thread:
Re: Global temp table problem w/ODP?
All the best.

How can multiple users from different locations access my Muse website files to update them?

We're a team, and we need to be able to work together remotely.
How can I let another user (on the East Coast - I'm on the West coast) have access to my Muse website files so that they can work on them and make changes - but I can also work on them here?
I've already made them an Admin in the Manage section of the live Muse website that is hosted on Business Catalyst.
BTW, they also belong to Creative Cloud.
Thanks!

You need to share your .muse file with this other person.
Muse does not currently support multiple users opening the same .muse file at the same time.
There's lots of options for sharing a file - you could copy it up to a company network server, or email the file back and forth, or use a filesharing service like Dropbox, SendThisFile, Adobe SendNow, or Creative cloud sync, among others.
Which one is right for you depends on the size of your file, how often you're sending the file back and forth, and personal preferences
Whatever you choose, it's important that you DO NOT have 2 users working on the same .muse file at the same time. This can cause corruption of your .muse file. I'd also recommend frequent backups of your .muse file, as you might find that one of you clobbers a change made by the other and you want to be able to go back to your old copy of your .muse file to copy/paste some content to your latest copy of your .muse file.

How can multiple users edit and access same ACCESS file

Hello,
We have 2 access files and multiple users needs to edit and access those files.
How can I enable mulitple access but only one user can edit rest of users are in read-only mode for one file and multiple access and edit on the another file.

Hi,
You should split your database in a front and backend. Then create two seperate front ends which you can distribute. If you need readonly you can opt for two options, setting the attributes of the file to read only or create a front end with read only forms.
The last one takes a little more work but is safer than setting the attributes to read only because people can change that back themselfs.
Maurice

Is there an app or way for multiple users to access contact info?

We are a small business that maintains a contact list of leads and clients in a MS word file. We can access those word files via our iphones, but only view them. Is there an app or way to have one person in the office maintain a database of leads and clients that a few users can access via iphone and simply touch the phone number to call them or touch the address for directions/map?
We know we could each input the info in each of our phones independently, but that is dumb - given someone in the office maintains such info as part of their job and updates it weekly/monthly whatever. Do you see what I mean? I cannot believe there is nothing out there for this.
Basically we are looking for a continuously updatable, multiple user, remotely accessible, interactive contact database with name, address, and phone number. I think that is what I would call it.

I can access phone numbers directly from our client list in word.
And that solves your quest looking for "a continuously updatable, multiple user, remotely accessible, interactive contact database with name, address, and phone number"?
Wow... I never know Microsoft Word could do so much!

Not able to access Mozilla with the generic account (NIS account) by multiple users simultaneously

• Using a single Generic account multiple users are trying to login from different machines simultaneously to Mozilla Firefox. • The Mozilla Firefox is fully operational only for the first user who has initially opened Firefox session. • If the second user trying to access the Firefox with the same account, it is displayed as there is another session is already running and most of the Firefox options are getting grayed out i.e the navigation, history and forward/ backward tabs available in the menus become inaccessible.Our Requirement is that multiple users need to access multiple sessions simultaneously with all the features of Firefox available. Kindly assist me here.

Same problem, Pls help me

We have multiple users, each with multiple devices, on 1 apple id - as we want to share music and ibooks etc. We want the children to have access to the store, but with a financial limit. How do we do this?

We have multiple users, each with multiple devices, on 1 apple id - as we want to share music and ibooks etc. We want the children to have access to the store, but with a financial limit. How do we do this?

Welcome to the Apple Community.
That's simply not possible I'm afraid. You'd need to give them their own account and allowance or make it so you are required to be there to input the password when they wish to make a purchase.

Since I have multiple users of my itunes account, is it possible to redeem a giftcard where only myiphone can access the redeemed money?

Since I have multiple users of my itunes account, is it possible to redeem a giftcard where only my iphone can access the redeemed money?

Yes, you can use another server for .ibooks format. You can also directly email it if your system can take the size.

Multiple Users need (maintenance) access to a customized table.

Hi Gurus
We created a z table and maintained couple of values in it
The _attributes _ are as follows:
Delivery Class : A (Application table (master and transaction data)
Table Maintenance : Display and Maintenance allowed
ISSUE :
This table does not allow multiple access. In other words, multiple users have to enter this table and change values in this table. Is that possible?
Could you let me know how can this be done?
Thanks a lot
Sridevi

By default, I think SM30, and probably SE16 as well, will lock the entire table if someone is trying to change it. So, only one person can maintain the table at a time. This is the simplest way that it can ensure data integrity.
If I wanted multiple users to be able to maintain a table simultaneously, I'd create a custom screen (dynpro, user dialog, whatever you want to call it) to do it, using lock objects (ENQUEUE and DEQUEUE function modules that you create for the key of your table) to lock / unlock specific rows when a user wanted to change them. I also might use some sort of reference number generator to ensure unique keys.
Not a terrifically complicated piece of development but you'd need to get a Abaper to do it.

How control multiple users to access same page?

Hi,
I am working on a public page where the data pull from
database base on different UUID. Where this page doesn't required
login account. It differential by UUID where it send via email.
What I affaird in the email that contain UUID that might
forward to multiple users for filling in a long forms with same
UUID.
(This form it could be share same department but different
sections).
How can I lock this page or only allow accessing by a user
until been submitted?

Qoop wrote:
I tested but it cannot be lock - i open the dept_id:HR in my pc
and I open same dept_id:HR in other pc which able to view same
page.
BKBK wrote:
That is a paradox. If entry to the page cannot be locked then
the form should not appear on at least one of the PCs. Could we see
your code.
Qoop later wrote:
anyway, here is the code (simplify version)...:
<cfquery of DEPT info base on the #URL.UUID#>
<cfif DEPT recordcount EQ 0>
Missing dept info <cflocation to xxx.cfm>
<cfelse>
<cfif SUBMIT EQ 1>
TQ for submitting...
<cfelse>
code start here...
<form action= next_page_action.cfm>
</cfif>
</cfif>
I have tested my suggestion. It works.
I can see where your code is leading to. However, it does not
follow the line I suggested on 08/08/2007. Its logic is essentially
different from mine. In my code, the condition for displaying the
form is in a lock. In your code, the form is displayed
unconditionally.

How to provide access to multiple users connected to a Dumb switch? (multi-auth/multi-domain)

Good morning everybody,
I am writing on behalf of not being able to implement a desired outcome in our company network. In fact the situation is as follows:
What I want to do is to be able to authenticate users (802.1x authentication) in our company radius server and authorize them access by having a dynamic VLAN assignment in a multi-user environment on one and the same port of a Cisco 2960 switch. So far, the authentication and authorization has been working completely smoothly (there are no problems with itself). The concept involves the configuration of both DATA and VOICE VLANs as I there is also phone authentication implemented. In order to simulate this environment I introduce a Dumb switch connected to my Cisco 2960 Catalyst.
What I have successfully managed to get to work so far is this:
1) On one switch port I have tried the “authentication host-mode multi-domain” and it worked perfectly for a PC behind a telephone, or with one PC connected to a the dumb switch + the telephone connected to another port of the dumb switch. Logically it is the same situation as there is a separation in two domains – DATA and VOICE. Bellow is an output from show authentication sessions for this scenario.
Interface MAC Address Method Domain Status Session ID
Fa0/23 0021.9b62.b79b dot1x DATA Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F3008E (user1)
Fa0/23 0015.655c.b912 dot1x VOICE Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F9009F (phone)
2) On the other hand, when I try the same scenario with the “authentication host-mode multi-auth”, the switch still separates the traffic in two domains and is able to authenticate all users, AS LONG AS they are in the same VLAN.
show authentication sessions:
Interface MAC Address Method Domain Status Session ID
Fa0/23 0021.9b62.b79b dot1x DATA Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F3008E (user1)
Fa0/23 b888.e3eb.ebac dot1x DATA Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F8008C (user2)
Fa0/23 0015.655c.b912 dot1x VOICE Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F9009F (phone)
However, I cannot succeed authentication of many users from DIFFERENT VLANs, neither in multi-auth nor in multi-domain modes.
What I want to get is an output like this:
Interface MAC Address Method Domain Status Session ID
Fa0/23 0021.9b62.b79b dot1x DATA Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F3008E (user1)
Fa0/23 b888.e3eb.ebac dot1x DATA Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F8008C (user2)
Fa0/23 0015.655c.b912 dot1x VOICE Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F9009F (phone)
I want the switch to authenticate the users anytime they connect to itself and for them to have an instant access to the network. (I tell this because I tried scenario 1) with multi-domain mode and authentication violation replace, and it worked but, two users never had access to the “Internet” simultaneously!!!
The configuration of the interface connected to the Dumb switch is as follows.
interface FastEthernet0/x
description Connection to DUMBswitch
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan XXX
switchport port-security maximum 10
switchport port-security
switchport port-security violation protect
authentication host-mode multi-auth
authentication priority dot1x
authentication port-control auto
authentication timer reauthenticate 4000
authentication violation replace
dot1x pae authenticator
dot1x timeout tx-period 10
spanning-tree portfast
The way I see it is explained in the following steps:
- PC1 connects to the Dumb switch. This causes the Cisco switch to authenticate user1. This creates an auth. session with its MAC address linked to a domain DATA.
- When PC2 connects to the Dumb switch, this causes the violation replace which replaces the recent authenticated MAC address with the MAC of PC2. I would like it once authenticated to appear in the authentication sessions with a link to a new DATA domain linked to the VLAN assigned from the RADIUS server.
Is this possible? I think (in theory) this is the only way to provide authenticated access to multiple users connecting through Dumb switch to the network.
Has anybody ever succeeded in such a configuration example and if yes, I would be love to get some help in doing so?
Thank you
Stoimen Hristov

Hi Stoimen,
I have done a setup similar to yours with the only exception being VLAN assignment. When I used dACLs only, it makes things somewhat easier as the VLAN no longer matters. Remember that the switchport is in access mode and will only allow a single VLAN across it (with the exception of the voice VLAN). I think that is the real cause of your problem.
From what I can see, you have 2 options available to you:
1) Use dACLs instead of VLAN assignment. This means that an access list will be downloaded from the radius server straight to the authenticated user's session. I have tested this and it works perfectly. Just Google Cisco IBNS quick reference guide and look for the section that deals with Low Impact mode.
2) Get rid of the dumb switches and use managed switches throughout your network. Dumb switches will always be a point of weakness in your network because they have no intelligence to do advanced security features like port security, 802.1x, DHCP snooping, etc.
Hopefully someone else will chime in with another option.
Xavier

Access Planning layout by multiple users

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for