Accounting Clerk in Payment File (DTAUZV)

Hello,
we have a requirement which is to include the accounting clerk in the payment file sent to the bank.
The accounting clerk in our case will be the same for all payments coming from the company code. I understand that there is a field in the vendor master, and that each vendor can be assigned to an accounting clerk. This would be one way
However, is it possible to assign a single accountign clerk to the payment method, bank or company code? updating all the vendors will take too much time. If we only update one accounting clerk per company code in OB05, will it take this value as default? (currently we have several, obsolete entried in OB05)
Thanks and regards
Daniel

You cannot assign accounting clerk to payment method, bank or company code.
Easily you can do the mass change of vendors if it is single accounting clerk data. I believe you have already created accounting clerk, otherwise define OB05.
Mass change vendors by using XK99. This is really easy.
Regards,
Ravi

Similar Messages

Payment advices not picking accounting clerk phone number and fax number.

Hi,
We have executed payment program and payment advices got generated. But in the output it is printing everthing i.e accounting clerk name, vendor number and amount. But it is not filling the accounting clerk phone number and fax number even though we have maintained it in our customized transaction code. Will this values in the payment advices will be picked up from standard t.code OB05, there we don't have option to give these two values.
Can anyboday help me on this.
Regards,
Sree

goto accunt groups with screen layout,
after creating the group or existing group, double click on account management, in payment transactions make the required fields are required.
regards,

After F110 run in the payment file the account holder details are missed

Hai
After running the F110 pament run, In the payment file the ACCOUNT HOLDER name is missing . The ACCOUNT HOLDER details must picked up from VENDOR MASTER. This is happening when ACCOUNT HOLDER and VENDOR are different. When ACCOUNT HOLDER and VENDOR are same it is displaying Correctly.The Bottom line is when VENDOR=ACCOUNT HOLDER, in the payment file it is displaying the VENDOR name correctly. But When VENDOR is not= ACCOUNT HOLDER, in the Payment file ACCOUNT HOLDER name is blanked out. The bank requires the name in that field in the payment file.
Kindly Assist me
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Akash Narayana

Hello Friends - Can you please give me a little idea on what could be the reason for the below issue.
We are using the program RFFOJP_T and when payment file is generated, some of the payment details are missing.
I have executed payment run for 5 payments and only one 1 has come to the file and below 4 are missing.
The following payment documents/payment orders were not updated
(Result of the payment document update)
    CoCd Payment document/Payment order
    9770 1400001524
    9770 1400001525
    9770 1400001526
    9770 1400001527
The accompanying payment media have not been generated
>
> Overview of the files generated (DME)
> Name / File name
Thanks

Payment Files - Irish Stdrd 18 for HSBC - 'Hub' account

Hello,
I'm working on config to enable us to send payment files to HSBC Net in the Irish standard 18 format.
HSBC have a requirement to transmit to them only a 6 digit account number; referred to as their HUB account number.
I have created a house bank & am able to generate the files ok, but this 6 digit account number is giving me problems.
Although I only enter a 6 digit account number on the house bank, the output file adds in two additional leading or trailing '0'.
I thinking that I will probably have to make a change to the program that creates the file, but was wondering if it is possible to acheive by the way the account number is formatted alone.
Has anyone come across this 'HUB' account number for HSBC Net themselves & if so can you offer any advise as to how you got the file to output in their required format?
Thanks
Steve

Louise,
For HSBC Net we are using two payment formats. MT103 & Irish Standard 18.
For both types I had to use T-CODE DMEE to create the two formats.
These are then linked to payment methods & are then used when generating a payment through F110. There are a number of things to setup to make these work & it took me a lot of playing around, testing & then fixing & trying again to get it right. there's not a lot of help out there for DMEE, I found looking at some existing formats helped, so you can see how they were built.
Steve

F110 DME payment file: add a number of lead days to posting and value date

Hello,
For an Italian company, the DME payment file (F110) needs to be checked and approved by an accountant after it is created. This takes 3 to 4 days after which the file is sent to the bank. The bank will reject the file if the value date is three days late (date which the bank uses to process the file on). For fiscal reasons the accounting clerks need the have the same posting date as the value date
I managed to set the value date in the DME files a couple of days later. The setting I used (FBZP -> bank determination -> value date) adds the number of lead days to the value date on the basis of the posting date as defined by the user in F110. For some reason I cannot set it to 0 days, it always adds up 1 day. Is that a normal effect or have I changed the settings in the wrong way?
I found another setting in customising ("define value date rules") which seems to have the same functionality. In the help function it is said that the setting does not influence the payment program and that the program manages the value date. Is there another setting? Can this problem be solved without the help of a programmer?
Thank you very much!
René
functional consultant
Edited by: ConsultantSAINT-OBAIN on Apr 8, 2010 10:24 AM

Here's a section of code that does exactly that:
CALL FUNCTION 'DATE_CONVERT_TO_FACTORYDATE'
EXPORTING
    CORRECT_OPTION                     = '+'
    DATE                               = G_WORKAREA3-CREATEDON
    FACTORY_CALENDAR_ID                = L_S_PLANT-FACTCAL_ID
IMPORTING
*   DATE                               =
   FACTORYDATE                        = L_FCDATE
EXCEPTIONS
    CALENDAR_BUFFER_NOT_LOADABLE       = 1
    CORRECT_OPTION_INVALID             = 2
    DATE_AFTER_RANGE                   = 3
    DATE_BEFORE_RANGE                  = 4
    DATE_INVALID                       = 5
    FACTORY_CALENDAR_NOT_FOUND         = 6
    OTHERS                             = 7.
L_FCDATE = L_FCDATE + L_S_ZLEAD-/BIC/ZLEAD.
CALL FUNCTION 'FACTORYDATE_CONVERT_TO_DATE'
    EXPORTING
      FACTORYDATE                  = L_FCDATE
      FACTORY_CALENDAR_ID          = L_S_PLANT-FACTCAL_ID
    IMPORTING
      DATE                         = L_DATE
    EXCEPTIONS
      CALENDAR_BUFFER_NOT_LOADABLE = 1
      FACTORYDATE_AFTER_RANGE      = 2
      FACTORYDATE_BEFORE_RANGE     = 3
      FACTORYDATE_INVALID          = 4
      FACTORY_CALENDAR_ID_MISSING = 5
      FACTORY_CALENDAR_NOT_FOUND   = 6
      OTHERS                       = 7.
* result value of the routine
RESULT = L_DATE.

Accounting clerk in f110

while configuring edit proposal in f110 it would ask us to select accounting clerk....,in my case i have configured in XK99 as well as in spro-fa(new)-ar and ap-vendor accounts-master data-preperation for creating vendor master data-define accounting clerks.
my company code is 1981.
while doing edit proposal the error which is showing is:
COCD 1981/1981 do not appear in proposal:correct
message no:fz003.
and another error is no data exist for the specific paying cocd1981 and sending company code 1981 in payment proposal...
will you please guide me to resolve this.
Thanks,
kiran

Hello,
Please kindly check whether the following situation exist in your
system, in this case that error FZ003 appears:
If you create a payment proposal for some payment ID, date;
then leave it as is;then create another payment ID, date and
execute payment proposal generation. Vendors/ customers
are blocked in the first payment proposal.
Solution: please delete this first created payment proposal
execute this payment run to the end.
This action will allow to execute subsequent payment runs as
company code will be unblocked for the subsequent payment runs by
the system. Don't forget to delete unsuccessful payment proposals
(with error FZ003) and run proposal generation again.
As well check the selection criteria you're using in the payment run. Maybe you're not selecting any open item as well.
Regards,
Renan

Issue in Turkey DME payment file

Hello Gurus,
We have an issue in F110 payment file. We have configured DMEE for "GARANTI BANK" for Turkey country. we have encountered an issue while creating payment file in F110. System is not considering into the payment file if a vendor is having multiple bank accounts in the vendor master and invoices are posted with different partner bank type. We are not facing any issue for mutiple invoices paid for same vendor with same vendor bank account. The below example will give clear picture.
1) Vendor-1075847 having two different bank accounts in vendor master with partner bank type-0001 & 0002
2) Total three invoices are due for payment out of these, two invoices are posted with bank type-0002 and remaining invoice is with bank type-0001
3) When I run F110 for all three invoices, invoices gets cleared but in payment file to be sent to bank showing only one invoice amount which was posted with bank type-0001.
4) I believe that I need to do some changes in DMEE tree configuration to get all invoices information in the payment file but no idea that in which segment & tag to be done.
It woudl be great if any one shares their ideas/experiences in this regard.
Thanks in advance

Hello Friends,
We have come to the conculsion that whenever line items are splitting in F110 as shown in the attached screen shot, system not picking up the entire amount into the payment file which was cleared in the payment run. This issue is encountering only when payments are dividing into line items for that particular vendor.
For above example: first line item having two invoices to be cleared consiting of amounts 258,00 & 129,00(partner bank type-0001) and second line item having only one invoice(amount-119,00) related to same vendor(with partner bank type-0002). Because of this split at F110 level..., payment file which is sending to bank getting only first line item invoices amount-387,00(258,00+129,00) instead of whole amount-506,00.
This issue might be resolved by combining these two line items into one line item or by making changes in the payment medium workbench format(DMEE tree). I have considered & tried all possible field in FBZP & vendor master and unluckly nothing workedout.
Please share you inputs. It deliberately need at this point of time.
Thanks in advance

Using Lockbox want to hit different GL account for each payment

Hi Everyone,
Currently, we have lockbox up and running for credit card payments from third party system and hitting cash account in Oracle.
I want to implement one more payment mode for e.g. ACH, which will hit differed revenue account in Oracle.
1. Now, as the current lockbox is hitting cash, I didn't left with any other option but I ended up setting up new lockbox with deffered revenue account attached to it. Here correct me if I am wrong with my understanding. Can one lockbox hit different GL account for different payment mode like Cash account for Credit Card and Differed Revenue account for ACH?
2. With my assumption from point 1 that I have to create new one for different GL account, I created new lockbox and added lockbox number in transmission format, control file and in data file. After that launched lockbox program for each lockbox number with understanding that each lockbox program will pick up its own payment records based on lockbox nubmer in datafile and process it. But what happened is that first lockbox program processed its own record and also another lockbox number records and finally, its processed its own way of hitting cash account. So again payments hit cash accounts, where my expectation was that each lockbox will pick up its own lockbox number record and hit it to respective GL account i.e. cash and deffered revenue.
Why one lockbox processed another lockbox number records also from same file?
How to achieve this? I dont want to make two seperate data file for each lockbox number, but want to process from one single data file.
Please update me ASAP as I need to freeze the requirement at the earliest.

I suggest you to create a Dummy Materials. Lets say,
material number: 1001
enter material description as Domestic
material number: 1002
enter material description as Imports
and in OBYC for GBB
make the following settings:
val grp      gen mod    val cla      gl a/c dr     gl a/c cr
0001     VBR     4000     74180040     74180040
0001     VBR     4001     78020091     78020091
so that when u create PO u can get default GL (consumption GL ) for the material (u can use the same for material group also) and u can maintain WRX acc determination as follows ..
val grp   val cla    gl a/c dr   gl a/c cr
0001      4000     123456     123456
0001      4001     456789     456789
Thus u need to create 2 different valuation class for these material group specific and in PO while entering the text u can add the text which is displayed along with material description
hope this helps

Grouping Credit Entry in Bank Account for Vendor Payments using Pay Wizard

Dear All
We are currently testing Payment Wizard for BACS Payments to Vendors . We have successfully posted payments to Vendor Accounts and to the Bank Account in GL. However we note each Vendor payment is credited to the Bank Account individually even though the Bank will take the payment in one amount for the Payment File Total.
Is it possible to credit the Bank Account with the Total Payment Run value as one amount only so that the credit matches exactly the manner in which the Bank will take the payment ?
I realise that we could process BACs through a dummy GL Account for the Bank and journalise to the Bank Account in total but would prefer to avoid this option.
Regards
Seán Lyons

Dear Seán,
Welcome you post on the forum.
Even though it is not ideal, you may not be able to avoid such additional clearing account since the way B1 works can not be changed.
Thanks,
Gordon

Accounting Clerk not extended to SAP Connect (SOST) with fax

Hi,
Hope you can help me with my below issue.
I am sending payment advice notes with program: RFFOEDI1 and RFFOUS_T
through transaction F110...I am happy with the payment advice note we
send with e-mail and it works fine because it does extend Accounting
Clerk as a sender in SOST. The problem comes in when the vendor's
standard of communication method is fax and we have maintained the
accounting clerk in the vendor master. So when you try to send vendor's
payment advice note through F110, It does NOT extend Accounting Clerk
information to SOST as a sender.
Can you please help asap.
Thanks,
Themba

Hi FI Gurus,
Can I please have feedback with regards to the above query.
Thanks,
Themba

Issue with Payment File Creation: F110

Hi, Everyone.
Can anyone help me regarding this issue: Payment with identification MR319 with the run date 15.11.2011 does not contain bank account and BIC in the header of the payment file?
Please advise.
Thank you in advance for the help.

Hi, Everyone.
Another update regarding this issue, in the transaction code F110, we added another program: ZSTR001S at the Printout/data medium. But whenever we run the payment, there's no payment file being created. How can I resolve this issue?
Actually, the solution in order to have bank headers in the file is to add the program ZSTR001S. Whenever we use the payment method: V, E and S, this program should be visible at the last tab. But upon adding this at the Printout/data medium (I did this by changing the payment medium of V and S from TRAX_DOMEST to ZSTR001S). So it became visible at the last tab, but it didn't create any payment file. What do you think is the reason behind this?
Thank you.

DME payment file Citibank Paylink

Does any one have experience with payment file generated in tx F110 in format that Citibank uses, called Paylink?
Before I start to program myself in ABAP maybe there are ways to save time and money to get the payment orders (open items with vendors) extracted from SAP.
Thanks for your attention!

Thank you.
The sum and the number of credit lines (payment to the Vendor) was available. I wasn't sure how to get the debit line info, as it is our information, as to how much payment has been made from our bank account.
To ease the process, we will just hardcode the number of debit line items as "1" and then aggregate the Amount fields for both total Debit and Credit sum.
Thank you for your information. It was helpful.

Payment file

hi all,
i never worked in fi.Basically iam an abaper, my requirement is to
generate payment file for bank using SAPFPAYM.plz can anyone
guide how to proceed.
thank you.

Hello,
It is difficult to give you step by step configuration. However, I would try to attempt to give you overview of configuration.
You must do the configuration in FBZP.
1. All Company Codes
2. Paying Company Codes
3. Payment Methods in Company Codes (Assign classical RFFO* program or PMW structure)
4. Payment Methods in Company Code
5. Bank Determination
        a. Ranking Order - Mention in which order we need to make the payment
        b. Bank Accounts - Bank Accounts for Payment Methods (Enter the Sub Accounts)
        c. Available Amounts - Enter Maximum Amounts
        d. Value Date
        e. Expenses / Charges
Also go through config. in OBPM1 / OBPM2 / OBPM3 and OBPM4.
Please let me know if you need any further details.
Thanks,
Ravi

Problem to run a CATT to replace accounting clerk data

Hi,
I have created a CATT in the development system to modify accounting clerk data in the production system.
When I do a remote execution (production system) in the background, I see errors in the log.
"No batch input data for screen SAPMF02D 7101.
What can I do to run the CATT successfully?
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Linda

Hi,
Pls check in your input flat file.whethere that correponding screen field values are there or not.if it is not there you have give.

R12.1.3 - Payment file with morethan 2Lacs payment for each supplier

Dear All,
We have a requirement to develope RTGS payment file for India payments. My requirement is each supplier payment amount is more than 2Lacks which will come into the payment file.
Kindly help me, Can i restict at Payment profile level or Payment format validation level.
Pls suggest me.
Reagards,
Anjana J

You can set this maximum amount limit in internal bank account level under account controls tab. I hope this will be applicable if you are using payment workbench screen for processing payments.
Not sure for payment batches, just test the scenario in test instance.

Accounting Clerk in Payment File (DTAUZV)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for