Accrual Reconciliation Load Run  report performance issue.

we have significant performance issues when running accrual reconciliation load run report. we had to cancel after have it run for a day. any idea on how to resolve it?

We experienced similar issue. As the runtime of this report depends on the input parameters. Remember, your first run of this report going to take significant amount of time and the subsequent runs will be much shorter.
But w had to apply the patches referred in the MOS article to resolve the performance issue.
Accrual Reconciliation Load Run Has Slow Performance [ID 1490578.1]
Thanks,
Sunthar....

Similar Messages

  • Accrual Reconciliation Load Run accoutning data

    Hi,
    Can anyone let me know from which table the Accrual Reconciliation Load Run picks up the acocunting CCIDs?
    Thanks and Regards,
    MPH

    We experienced similar issue. As the runtime of this report depends on the input parameters. Remember, your first run of this report going to take significant amount of time and the subsequent runs will be much shorter.
    But w had to apply the patches referred in the MOS article to resolve the performance issue.
    Accrual Reconciliation Load Run Has Slow Performance [ID 1490578.1]
    Thanks,
    Sunthar....

  • Accrual Reconciliation Rebuil - No Report --- problem

    Hi friends
    i need to run Accrual Reconciliation Rebuild. but i find the report as Accrual Reconciliation Rebuild - No Report. I've run this earlier as Accrual Reconciliation Rebuild. why is it showing as Accrual Reconciliation Rebuild - No Report? moreover, there is an extra parameter p_op_unit_coa_id is shown in the parameter form. whenever i try to submit the report it says
    APP-FND-01404: An invalid style, LANDWIDE240, is specified.
    Cause: AOL cannot find a record for the print style LANDWIDE240
    Action: Check that the print style LANDWIDE240 is a valid style and that a record exists in FND_PRINTER_STYLESPls help me.
    Thanks
    Lisan

    check this forum thread :
    Accrual Reconcilliation Report
    /S.P DASH

  • Report performance Issue in BI Answers

    Hi All,
    We have a performance issues with reports. Report is running more than 10 mins. we took query from the session log and ran it in database, at that time it took not more than 2 mins. We have verified proper indexes on the where clause columns.
    Could any once suggest to improve the performance in BI answers?
    Thanks in advance,

    I hope you dont have many case statements and complex calculations that you do in the Answers.
    Next thing you need to monitor is how many rows of data that you are trying to retrieve from the query. If the volume is huge then it takes time to do the formatting on the Answers as you are going to dump huge volumes of data. Database(like teradata) returns initially like 1-2000 records if you hit show all records then even db is gonna fair amount of time if you are dumping many records
    hope it helps
    thanks
    Prash

  • Database migrated from Oracle 10g to 11g Discoverer report performance issu

    Hi All,
    We are now getting issue in Discoverer Report performance as the report is keep on running when database got upgrade from 10g to 11g.
    In database 10g the report is working fine but the same report is not working fine in 11g.
    The query i have changed as I have passed the date format TO_CHAR("DD-MON-YYYY" and removed the NVL & TRUNC function from the existing query.
    The report is now working fine in Database 11g backhand but when I am using the same query in Discoverer it is not working and report is keep on running.
    Please advise.
    Regards,

    Pl post exact OS, database and Discoverer versions. After the upgrade, have statistics been updated ? Have you traced the Discoverer query to determine where the performance issue is ?
    How To Find Oracle Discoverer Diagnostic and Tracing Guides [ID 290658.1]
    How To Enable SQL Tracing For Discoverer Sessions [ID 133055.1]
    Discoverer 11g: Performance degradation after Upgrade to Database 11g [ID 1514929.1]
    HTH
    Srini

  • XL Report performance issues

    Hello All,
    We are running some XL reports and facing some performance issues: 10 mins for a report to run.
    We don´t plan to split this report in many other ones, and I have already run the SQL tools for reorganizing and reindexing the tables (I believe this is nothing to do with performance but ran it anyway...) without any improvements.
    Can anybody be a help on this?
    Thanks!

    Hi Siavauch Saleki 
    Name the report which take too long to run, i have worked on XL report, when i run report from client system it takes some long time,
    try running to run from server
    another way of making it faster is go to Task manager in the process tab
    Change the priority of XL Reporter , excel to HIGH
    THIS WILL MAKE IT FASTER BY ALLOCATING MORE PROCESSOR TIME FROM OS TO IT
    This should improve the reporting speed
    Let me know how it works
    Regards
    Krish

  • Webi Reports - Performance Issues

    Hi Experts,
           Right now we are using BO XI R2 version. We have 2 servers, server 1 is old and server 2 is new (AIX server u2013 new upgrade of old server).
          When I trying to schedule the report (webi) in both server, reports is running successfully. But problem is that the report scheduling time is more in new server (AIX) than old server (Server1).
    There is some performance issues
    Example:
    Old serve     : 1 hrs (time taken)
    New server  : 2 hrs (time taken)
    Could you please tell me how to increase the webi report performance in new server?
    Regards,
    Sridharan Krishnan

    Hi,
    How to enable Excel and Pdf option under Save as file in infoview.
    When i trying to click modify option under public folder reports ,Report is getting open but i am not able to save that report as excel or pdf , since those option is disabled in infoview.
    But it is enabled in user private folder Reports.
    Right now we have upgraded the objects from XI R2 to BO 3.1, Since there is some difference in security rights in 3.1, Please tell me how to fix it.
    BO Version u2013  3.1
    Regards,
    Sridharan

  • Report Performance Issue - Activity

    Hi gurus,
    I'm developing an Activity report using Transactional database (Online real time object).
    the purpose of the report is to list down all contacts related activities and activities NOT related to Contact by activity owner (user id).
    In order to fullfill that requirment I've created 2 report
    1) All Activities related to Contact -- Report A
    pull in Acitivity ID , Activity Type, Status, Contact ID
    2) All Activities not related to Contact UNION All Activities related to Contact (Base report) -- Report B
    to get the list of activities not related to contact i'm using Advanced filter based on result of another request which is I think is the part that slow down the query.
    <Activity ID not equal to any Activity ID in Report B>
    Anyone encountered performance issue due to the advanced filter in analytic before?
    any input is really appriciated
    Thanks in advanced,
    Fina

    Fina,
    Union is always the last option. If you can get all record in one report, do not use union.
    since all records, which you are targeting, are in the activity subject area, it is not nessecery to combine reports. add a column with the following logic
    if contact id is null (or = 'Unspecified') then owner name else contact name
    Hopefully, this is helping.

  • HR ABAP- Report Performance Issue

    Can you please any body tell me how to debug a report program by putting watch points and break points.
    Waiting for your Reply.
    Anu
    Bangalore

    Hi,
               If you have programm name then proceed with SE38 or take the programm name from Trasaction code which  you are using.
    Break Points:   If it is performance issue , put external break points around select querie and loop ---end loop.
    Watch Points :  in the debug screen choose the watch  point option and  give the field name from  your internal table for which you want to put watch point.
    After that give the range which you record you want to see in the range options.
    for these steps:  1. Execute your programm.
           2. In the selection screen enter /h in the command window to start debugging screen or put break points before excuting.
         3. Once you are in debug screen then start woring with F5 or F6 or F7 and create watch points where ever you like.

  • FRS report performance issue

    Hello,
    We have a report developed in FRS in the below style.
    http://postimg.org/image/bn9dt630h/b9c2053d/
    Basically, all the dimensions are asked in POV. In the rows of the reports, we have two sparse dimensions that are drilled down to level 0 as shows in above report. The report works fine when run in local currency (Local currency is a stored member). When the report runs in a different currency (dynamic member) then it keeps on running for ages. We waited for 45 minutes and then had to cancel a report, when the same was run in local currency, it gave us our results in 30 seconds.
    My thinking is that there should be a better way of showing level 0 members than using "Descendants of Current Point of View for Total_Entity AND System-defined member list Lev0,Entity" as I presume what it does is get descendants as well as level0 members and then compare them. I have alternate hierarchies hence I am using this, isn't there a simple way of saying - just give me level 0 members of the member selected in POV ?
    I have used below parameters
    Connection - Essbase
    Suppress rows on Database connection server
    Regards,

    Hello,
    >> The report works fine when run in local currency (Local currency is a stored member). When the report runs in a different currency (dynamic member) then it keeps on running for ages.
    You are focusing on the report. The most likely reason is in the performance of the database. Ofcourse, you can reduce the query size and get your report performing again, but the root cause is likely the database design.
    I do not know a function to drill down to the level0 members of the selected POV member.
    If this is something different per user, then you might think about meta-read filters. They would remove all that is not granted.
    Regards,
    Philip Hulsebosch

  • Accrual Reconciliation Rebuild - No Report/Accrual Reconciliation Report

    Hi Experts,
    It is well-known that Accrual Reconciliation Report shows out the data from po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all i.e. only that data which resides in po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all table will be picked and showed on the report based on net_po_line_amount and net_po_line_quantity (i.e. depends on the tolerance levels given). But if I want to show the data from backend thru query, i will use this table and give my conditions for net_po_line_amount and net_po_line_quantity. As mentioned in Note:433683.1 in Metalink, it is mentioned that:
    The following two columns in the PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP_ALL table
    determines whether a Transaction appears on the Accrual Reconciliation
    Report.
    Net_po_line_quantity
    Net_po_line_amount
    For a Transaction not to appear on the Accrual Reconciliation Report
    net transaction quantity AND the net transaction amount for each PO Line must be
    less than or equal to the values entered in the tolerance parameters (or <= 0,
    which is the default value).
    This means I will make my query which should match with the report data:
    select * from po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all
    where net_po_line_amount>0 and net_po_line_quanity>0;
    But I have seen some cases where both these are zero and still shown on the report, i have seen few more cases where these are null and still shown on the report. May be we need to add more conditions or somewhere I am doing wrong! Please suggest what all conditions we should consider while incorporating with this type of requirement.
    Any suggestions on this will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance!
    Regards,
    Sumir Chawla

    Hi,
    Pleaser refer the below documentation ...
    Accrual Reconciliation Report Errored Out With APP-FND-01564: ORACLE error 942 in FDFGDF [ID 1440284.1]
    Regards,
    Ivruksha

  • Hyperion Interactive reporting performance issue.

    Hi,
    We created a report in Hyperion Interactive reporting using Hyperion Essbase as database connection file .
    Report performance was good in Interactive reporting Studio we don't have any problem in studio.
    when we open the the report in Hyperion Workspace We are facing performance issue of the report and also when i hit refresh button to refresh data in the Workspace,i am getting the following error message
    *"An Interactive Reporting Service error has occurred - Failed to acquire requested service. Error Code : 2001"*
    Any suggestions to resolve this will be really helpful.
    Thanks in advance
    Thanks
    Vamsi
    Edited by: user9363364 on Aug 24, 2010 7:49 AM
    Edited by: user9363364 on Sep 1, 2010 7:59 AM

    Hi
    i also faced such an issue and then i found the answer on metalink
    Error: "An Interactive Reporting Service Error has Occurred. Failed to Acquire Requested Service. Error Code: 2001" when Processing a bqy Report in Workspace. [ID 1117395.1]     
    Applies to:
    Hyperion BI+ - Version: 11.1.1.2.00 and later [Release: 11.1 and later ]
    Information in this document applies to any platform.
    Symptoms
    Obtaining the following error when trying to process a BQY that uses an Essbase data source in Workspace:
    "An Interactive Reporting Service error has occurred. Failed to acquire requested service. Error Code: 2001".
    Cause
    The name of the data source in the CMC contained the machine name in fully qualified name format whereas the OCE contained the machine name only. This mismatch in machine names caused the problem. Making the machine name identical in both cases resolved the problem.
    Solution
    Ensure that the name of the data source as specified in the OCE in Interactive Reporting Studio matches the name specified in the CMC tool in the field "Enter the name of the data source".
    In fact, all fields need to match between the OCE and the CMC Data Source.
    regards
    alex

  • Deski reports performance issue

    After an upgrade from BOXI Release2-SP3 to BOXI Release3.1-SP3 all the deski reports are very slow when we try to refresh them using Infoview.
    For example, a specific deski report needs two minutes from Desktop Intelligence and twenty!!! minutes from Infoview. The same behavior have all the migrated deski reports. Do you have any idea/workaround??

    hi,
    - Set the array fetch size as 500 and array bind size as 32767 in Universe Parameters
    Following links will be helpful.
    http://www.forumtopics.com/busobj/viewtopic.php?t=142973&sid=0a48878553739783e77ca43ae06c5cdb
    Performance issue with Deski in three tier mode
    Regards,
    Vamsee

  • 2014 SSRS Reports Performance issues

    Hi All,
    After upgrading SQL 2008 reports to SQL 2014 i observed there is performance lag in 2014 ssrs reports,
    2008 reports which used to render in <2 secs now taking >50 secs,
    After doing some checks on why this lag occurred, i found that this is because of the expressions in reports, If i remove all the expressions then report renders < 2 secs otherwise its taking >50 secs 
    My question here is, we used the same expressions in 2008 version also which displays the report in <2 secs but why same thing taking more time in 2014 version.
    Is expressions handling in 2008 and 2014 different.
    and below are the expressions used in the both the versions
    IIF(ISNOTHING(Fields!Comp.Value),"-",Fields!Comp.Value) 
    IIF(ISNOTHING(Fields!Base.Value),"-",Fields!Base.Value)
    IIF(ISNOTHING(Fields!Var.Value),"-",Fields!Var.Value)
    iif(Fields!check.Value=true,"yellow","Transparent")
    Thanks in advance 
    Chandra.

    Hi Chandra,
    According to your description, the same report render slower in SQL Server 2014 than in SQL Server 2008.
    In both SSRS 2008 and SSRS 2014, the expression is processed in the same way. In Reporting Services, the total time to generate a report include TimeDataRetreval, TimeProcessing and TimeRendering. To analyze which section take much time, we can check the
    table Executionlog3 in the ReportServer database. For more information, Please refer to this article:
    More tips to improve performance of SSRS reports.
    After check out which section costs most of time, then you can refer to this article to optimize your report:
    Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance.
    If possible, please share some information about your report migration.
    Best regards,
    Qiuyun Yu
    Qiuyun Yu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Deductions Report performance issue

    Has anyone encountered performance problems lately with the Deductions Report?
    We have a custom report that is a modified version of the seeded report, and we cannot run the report to completion since our last round of patching. Patches applied are listed below, and include YE Phase 2.
    We have not yet opened a TAR on this, because we'll need to gather some information internally first.
    Thanks,
    Carrie
    Year-end and year-start updates, as follows:
    Patches 5555555, 5555550, 5650846, and HR Global – 2006 Oracle Year-End Phase 2
    Patch 5573903 – Quantum 2.8.2, Quantum 2006 Upgrade
    Patches 5589335 (prerequisite) and 5511810 – EEO Patch
    Patch 5416623 – Unable to process Admin Life Events (Benefits)
    Carrie Hollack
    [email protected]

    We've hit the performance bug and logged an SR. We ran the shipped report and it chugged for 2 1/2 days then blew up on snapshot too old. If you can avoid that error then it fails with ORA-01722: invalid number. I defragged and analyzed the Payroll tables and indexes but it's not enough to help the bad code. I think part of the issue is that the report code just uses a generic /*+ RULE */ hint. Another part of the issue may be that NULLs in the payroll tables aren't properly accounted for in the code.
    The behavior of the 'RULE' hint seems to be dependent on what the Paryoll LOW_VOLUME parameter is set to. That is, with LOW_VOLUME=Y and small tables the 'RULE' hint might be fine, but in the real World with with LOW_VOLUME=YouGottaBeKidding it doesn't.
    The new Payroll Activity Report for the whole year has very good performance--it only took 4 hours in our environment--and it used to take days.
    Open an SR and ask to be attached to Bug 5742521.

Maybe you are looking for