ACK Aleaud messages in IDoc2IDoc scenario

Hi,
I'm working on an scenario IDoc2IDoc, with a simple BPM in XI. A sends idocs to B going through XI and a BPM.
Does anybody know if it's possible to make XI route the ACK messages (ALEAUD) from B to A? It works fine if there's no BPM in the middle, but it seems that when there's a BPM XI tries to route from B to the BPM first, as I can see the ACK message (the one associated with the original BPM to B) appearing in the sxmb_moni with the message "Acknowledgement message stopped".
Thanks!

Hi Jorge
XI wont receive ACk as normal message other than using IDX_ALEREQUEST.
As XI understand this ACK and ACK to itself. You need to execute this and set sender port and client to make this as message instead of ACK.
Thanks
Gaurav

Similar Messages

IDOC_TO_FILE ALEAUDIT message SPLIT

Hi,
1.   I am sending an IDOC from R3 to XI.
2.   In XI IDOC splits in to 2 messages
3.   XI sends the 2 messages to 2 File systems(FTP).
4.   NO BPM, tried on SP19 / SP20,
5.    Expected 2 ALEAUDIT messages back to R/3
Problem:
    ALEAUDIT messages are not reaching the R/3.
Additional Info:
1. I dont have any problem in receiving ALEAUDIT message in IDOC_XI_FILE scenario with out message split, means one receiver. Problem is with message split and 2 receivers.
Thanks in advance.
Moni

Hi Moni,
Please check following points -
1. Do you get any error in SXMB_MONI transaction in XI? Whats happening to the response messages there? Are you able to see any entry in SXMB_MONI for that?
2. Also ALEAUDIT idoc only allows few statuses not all. It will be worth checking which status is being passed back to R3. (This will not be relevent in you case as the scenario works without message split...)
3. Check if you have set up partner profiles correctly and corresponding parter number is set in Idoc specific attributes in adapter channel.
Hope this helps.
Rahul.

How to stop ALEAUD messages

Hi,
I have a scenario Idoc -> JMS and I don't want acknowlegements to be sent back to the sender system.
Even though I maintain IDX_NOALE report to not request any acknowledgement I still get ALEAUD messages back.
How can I turn it off?
Thanks,
Olof

Hi,
Check the combination of sender port , Client and message maintained in idx_noale level...
HTH
Rajesh

Preventing ALEAUD messages

Hi all,
my business scenario is : CRM(Idocs) --> XI --> JDBC.
when CRM sends an Idoc to XI,it receives an ALEAUD message as response.
is there any way to stop XI from sending ALEAUD messages back to CRM.
regards,
-kausik

See this link.
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/44/932e8896b610bbe10000000a422035/content.htm">Controlling ALE Acknowlegments</a>
Also in CRM if you are using CRMXIF_C1 - ensure the acknoledgment check button is turned off to transform from BDOCS to IDOCS
sincerely,
--NM

Configuring ALEAUD message between Non - SAP sytem and SAP sytem through XI

Hi
We have Scenario like an IDoc would be send to SAP through XI system by a non - sap system and expects the Status of the sent IDoc from SAP system in an Async communication by using ALEAUD message type.
Non SAP <==> XI <==> SAP
We have tried and ending up an error at SAP while the ALEAUD is being sent back.
"No Service for the system <SID> and <Client number> in the Integration Directory"
We are able to successfully send MATMAS IDoc to SAP throgh XI by non - sap system(File Server) but while sending Acknowledgement(ALEAUD)IDoc, it is failing at trfc queue(Status 03). RFC destination and Port and Partner Profile all Ok.
When we configure the same between two R/3 systems as XI between is working fine for the same Scenario but for Non - SAP system to SAP ,it is giving problem.
As we know "ALE audit is only possible for IDocs of type logical system (LS)."
Can't we treat XI system as logical system insted of actual sending system and configure ALEAUD??? We are ending up with the same error above.
Appreciate if anybody throw light???
Thanks in Advance.
Kind Regs
Ramesh

Hi Ramesh,
In your Integration Directory, in the Sender Business System --> Adapter Specific Identifiers, you have to give the logical name for the business System pointing to the R/3 system. Just try this.
Also take a look at this blog:-
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/03/29/xi-error--unable-to-convert-the-sender-service-to-an-ale-logical-system
I hope this helps.
Regards.
Praveen

ALE Configurations for IDOC2IDOC scenario

Hi Experts,
Can anyone list down wht r the ALE configurations are required for IDOC2IDOC scenario?
1. Sender SAP ---> XI
2. XI ---> Reciever SAP
Please provide me the TCodes with the details that are needed for the above scenario?
Your help is higly appreciated
Rgds
Faisal....
Edited by: Abdul Faisal on Jul 28, 2008 11:49 AM

Hey,
Steps for ALE settings:-
Steps for XI
Step 1)
     Goto SM59.
     Create new RFC destination of type 3(Abap connection).
     Give a suitable name and description.
     Give the Ip address of the R3 system.
     Give the system number.
     Give the gateway host name and gateway service (3300 + system number).
     Go to the logon security tab.
     Give the lang, client, username and password.
     Test connection and remote logon.
Step 2)
     Goto IDX1.
     Create a new port.
     Give the port name.
     Give the client number for the R3 system.
     Select the created Rfc Destination.
Step 3)
     Goto IDX2
     Create a new Meta data.
     Give the Idoc type.
     Select the created port.
Steps for R3.
Step 1)
     Goto SM59.
     Create new RFC destination of type 3(Abap connection).
     Give a suitable name and description.
     Give the Ip address of the XI system.
     Give the system number.
     Give the gateway host name and gateway service (3300 + system number).
     Go to the logon security tab.
     Give the lang, client, username and password.
     Test connection and remote logon.
Step 2)
     Goto WE21.
     Create a port under transactional RFC.(R3->XI)
     Designate the RFC destination created in prev step.
Step 3)
     Goto SALE.
     Basic settings->Logical Systems->Define logical system.
     Create two logical systems(one for XI and the other for R3)
     Basic settings->Logical Systems->Assign logical system.
     Assign the R3 logical system to respective client.
Step 4)
     Goto WE20.
     Partner type LS.
     Create partner profile.
     Give the outbound or inbound message type based on the direction.
                In your Sender R3:- outbound
                In your Receiver R3:- Inbound.
Step 5)
     Goto WE19
     Give the basic type and execute.
     fill in the required fields.
     Goto IDOC->edit control records.
     Give the following values.(Receiver port,partner no.,part type and sender Partner no. and type)
     Click outbound processing.
Step 6)
     Go to SM58
     if there are any messages then there is some error in execution.
     Goto WE02.
     Check the status of the IDOC.
     Goto WE47.
     TO decode the status code.
Step 7)
     Not mandatory.
     Goto BD64.
     Click on Create model view.
     Add message type.
BD87 to check the status of IDOC.
In case if not authorized then go to the target system and check in SU53, see for the missing object
and assign it to the user.
SAP r3
sm59(status check)(no message)
WE02(status check)
WE05(status check)
BD87(status check)
WE42 process code
WE47 status info.
<removed by moderator>
regards,
       Milan
Edited by: Mike Pokraka on Jul 28, 2008 5:04 PM

Treatement of Fault Messages in Synchronous Scenarios?!

Hi all,
I got a question concerning the use of fault messages in
synchronous scenarios...
1. When I define a fault message for my synchronous
   receiver interface, a fault message, coming back
   would not be handled by my sync. Interface- and
   Messagemapping, right?
   So how can I give the fault messageinformation back to
   the sender?
2. Will I have to define a second scenario for handling
   the fault message?
   (Meaning new Communication Channel, MI, IM, MM and so
   on)
   Thanks for help, anwers are quickly rewarded...
   Daniel

> 1. When I define a fault message for my synchronous
>
>    receiver interface, a fault message, coming back
>    would not be handled by my sync. Interface- and
>    Messagemapping, right?
> So how can I give the fault messageinformation
> ion back to
>    the sender?
The fault message has to be handled in your BPM using an exception branch. You can create an exception branch in a block and assign it to be the handler for a particular exception(fault message).
How can we handle Exception Branch in BPM effectively
> 2. Will I have to define a second scenario for
> handling
>    the fault message?
> (Meaning new Communication Channel, MI, IM, MM and
> and so
>    on)
It depends on what you want to do with your fault message. If you want to throw an alert, that could trigger emails, you can do it by configuring alerts and using a control step in your exception branch to throw alerts. Only if you want to do something else like log a message into a database, you will need separate jdbc communication channel, MI etc.
Regards,
Suresh

Threshold for Messages in integration scenario?

Hi,
Can we set threshold (time) for Messages in integration scenario?
Thanks,
Nagarjuna.

Hi Earlence,
> 1. Is it possible to search for messages sent to PI (7.1) via TREX and monitor their status?
Status I am not aware, but we can search the messages based on the content.
Its external search engine for SAP, we can buy this and install in the XI server.
ex : Suppose we have an order number, we don't no in which scenario it is used then we give
this number to the TREX then it searches and gives that scenarion name.
> 2. Search should be possible based on various criteria like Sender/Receiver Component/Interface, Business system name etc.
TREX is based on a client/server architecture. The client component is integrated into the application that uses the TREX functions, and allows communication with the TREX servers.The server component processes the requests; it indexes and classifies documents and answers search queries.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/78df2a46-0a01-0010-ef81-a6
be60cc5cfd
> 3. Is there a Java API so that this can be done programmatically?
May be available but this is not easy.
> 4. Some resources for the same?
/people/prasad.illapani/blog/2005/11/14/payload-based-message-search-in-xi30-using-trex-engine
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/70/0837ced133304eba452c45b6047c74/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/78df2a46-0a01-0010-ef81-a6be60cc5cfd
Regards
Ramesh

[svn] 3687: Add some messaging tests for scenarios that involve subscribing to a destination , disconnecting from the channel currently being used and resubscribing to the destination .

Revision: 3687
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-10-16 11:23:39 -0700 (Thu, 16 Oct 2008)
Log Message:
Add some messaging tests for scenarios that involve subscribing to a destination, disconnecting from the channel currently being used and resubscribing to the destination. There is an issue that is causing the streaming/multipleDisconnectsResubscribesTest.mxml test to fail that I will log a bug for.
Added Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/longpolling/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/longpolling/disconnectResubscribeJMSTest.mxml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/longpolling/disconnectResubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/longpolling/multipleDisconnectsResubscribesTest.mxml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/polling/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/polling/disconnectResubscribeJMSTest.mxml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/polling/disconnectResubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/polling/multipleDisconnectsResubscribesTest.mxml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/streaming/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/streaming/disconnectResubscribeJMSTest.mxml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/streaming/disconnectResubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/streaming/multipleDisconnectsResubscribesTest.mxml

Revision: 3687
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-10-16 11:23:39 -0700 (Thu, 16 Oct 2008)
Log Message:
Add some messaging tests for scenarios that involve subscribing to a destination, disconnecting from the channel currently being used and resubscribing to the destination. There is an issue that is causing the streaming/multipleDisconnectsResubscribesTest.mxml test to fail that I will log a bug for.
Added Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/longpolling/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/longpolling/disconnectResubscribeJMSTest.mxml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/longpolling/disconnectResubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/longpolling/multipleDisconnectsResubscribesTest.mxml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/polling/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/polling/disconnectResubscribeJMSTest.mxml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/polling/disconnectResubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/polling/multipleDisconnectsResubscribesTest.mxml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/streaming/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/streaming/disconnectResubscribeJMSTest.mxml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/streaming/disconnectResubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/unsubscribeScen arios/streaming/multipleDisconnectsResubscribesTest.mxml

IDoc Packaging + Ack ALEAUD = bad behavior ?

Hi,
I'm in version PI 7.11 and I'm studying the IDoc packaging of EhP1 with Acknowledgment (ALEAUD).
My scenario is a basic one: File -> PI --> ECC (100 idocs). And then ECC returns Ack.
So for the returned Acknowledgment, I have that:
- on ECC, I did ALE config, and I run programs RBDSTATE / RSEOUT00 to create one IDoc ALEAUD (Ack).
- In PI, I use a sender CC (Idoc adapter) by using option "Idoc Packaging".
- In PI, I use a Sender Agreement with Idoc ECC's ALEAUD and this sender CC.
- In PI, I use program IDX_ALEREQUEST on ECC's ALEAUD idoc.
My problem is:
ECC send me ONE idoc ALEAUD which contains 100 segments corresponding to 100 Idocs received at the first step. BUT even if I used the "Idoc Packaging"... in IDX5 of PI, I have not one idoc ALEAUD, but I have 100 Idocs ALEAUD !
And so after that my mapping is run 100 times instead of one ! Image if I need to return an email... with this PI behaviour, I will send 100 "Ack" emails.
So does somebody know why IDoc Packaging does not work with ALEAUD whereas program IDX_ALEREQUEST is correctly used ?
Thanks
Mickael
Note: I don't want to have to create a BPM to collect my ALEAUD Idocs. That's too heavy...
And (for the moment), I don't want to create a specific ZALEAUD idoc...

Hi Prashant,
yes, I did not precise it, but of course IDXNOALE is used, else PI will generate an Ack of this ECC's ALEAUD... so a ack of a ack... but it's not really my problem.
what I say is:
- Request : PI -> 100 idocs MATMAS (for instance)
- Ack : ECC return to PI only one idoc ALEAUD with 100 segments "E1STATE" corresponding to the 100 idocs MATMAS.
- Ack : PI receive this only one ALEAUD... but in IDX5 and in SXI_MONITOR, we see in fact 100 IDocs ALEAUD with 1 segment E1STATE, instead of having only one idoc ALEAUD (like in ECC side) !
So I'm searching a way to keep in PI the only one Idoc ALEAUD sent by ECC, in order to be able (for instance) to send only one email (and not 100 emails like it's the case for the moment).
Regards
Mickael

Acknowledgement message for Async scenario...

Hello All,
I am working on Asynchronous scenario (IDOC -> File). I have confirgured all the things properly. My problem is when i execute the idoc everything is working fine file got created at FTP. But in sxmb_moni i am getting success message with still wating for acknowledgement "?".... Where i have did the mistake.. as this is async scenario this message is not expected.
Is there anyone who had faced such problem... Please let me know..
Thanks for all your help in advance...

Hi Siddhesh,
By default, Sender IDOC adapter requests IDOC acknowledgement from receiver adapter, when we send IDOC to XI. In your case, System acknowledgement sent by File adapter is converted in to ALE audit message and sent to sender system.
If you want to receive acknowledgement then you need to configure IDOC receiver communication channel.
Refer to this good blog
/people/saravanakumar.kuppusamy2/blog/2005/01/20/configuration-tips-for-a-business-serviceintegration-process-to-send-back-ale-audit-idoc
From the above blog....
At times, there could be a scenario where in we do not need the ALEAUD IDOCs to be got back.
To acheive this add the PORT,CLIENT and MESSAGETYPE to the table IDXNOALE.Use transaction SE16 -> specify the table name "IDXNOALE" and then choose create new entries.Specify the values for PORT, CLIENT and MESTYPE fields, save the entry.This procedure helps switch off ALEAUD IDOCs from being sent back to the sender SAP system.
Best Regards,
Divyesh

Rbdstate - Send ALEaudit in time critical scenario

Hy all,
how can I use RBDSTATE report to send Acknowledge IDOC to my XI 7.0 server in a time critical scenario? I use Ack IDOCs in a time critical complex BPM that attends audit to continue with the following steps of transformation and send xml messages to ERP.
Problem is that an OSS note says to schedul job RBDTSATE with a time period higher 5 minutes; this time is too high for us (BPM contain more steps that needs an ERP ack).
How can I solve this issue to simplify and make more fast the BPM?
Thanks in advance,
Marco

Hi Chris,
Is the "subVI" in question really a subVI of the higher-priority VI? If yes, that would make it run at higher-priority as well -- probably not what you want to do.
See this for further details: http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/D7E975105812F0C586256A6B005B4957
I would keep the two VIs separate (to keep their priorities separate) and transfer data via LV2-style globals between them.
-Khalid

Fault message in synchronous scenario

I defined an integreationprocess with synchronous send step and an exception branch.
And I specified an exception for a fault message which I defined in the synchronous interface.
My problem is, that the exception is not triggered by application errors. The integrationprocess is canceled, although I defined an alternative way in exception branch. I can´t figure why exception isn´t triggered, but I have an assumption.
This is the inbound fault message from receiver:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<fault:AuthException xmlns:fault="urn:vwservices">
<fault:messageText>Session Token expired or not valid</fault:messageText>
</fault:AuthException>
But in interface mapping, when I execute a test run for fault message, the message looks like:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:AuthException xmlns:ns0="urn:vwservices">
<ns0:messageText/>
</ns0:AuthException>
The xml messages are different because of namespace. Is it the problem, why the exception isn´t triggered?
For this scenario I use a WSDL File from receiver system, which means that, I did not create the fault message myself.
Thanks for your help!

Yes, I have assigned the same name.
I made a test with the system error.
Before testing I assigned my exception handler (the same as for application errors) in the send step under item "System Error".
Then I manipulated my message mapping, so that an system error will be created.
This szenario works fine. After system error the exception branch was executed.
I´m truly desperate, because the Application Error don´t work.

Restartable message in synchronous scenario

Hi experts,
I have a <b>synchronous</b> HTTP-XI-RFC scenario. Since this is a synchronous process, no queue will be kept and the message can't be restarted. So I clearly know that if in any case XI is down, sender system will received either a runtime error or timeout error (correct if I'm wrong).
The thing is the sender system wants XI to take charge of the queue. This is due to sender system can only send one time of request, and need the response immediately. So if any error happen for example if XI is down, they wants the process to resume back at XI side.
I'm thinking is BPM able to solved this problem? like by using a sync/async kind of design. Or is JMS adapter is the better choice?
I've been cracking my head for many days, hope someone can kindly enlighten me.

Moon,
In your above case its possible by restarting the BPM. But i'm not sure how it works. Bcoz the sender is synchronous after some time if it didn't get any responses it will error out saying Timeout exception. After restarting the BPM I don't know how does it works!!!
I haven't worked on such scenario. In my case the scenario is different Sender SOAP --->XI -
>Synchronous Webservice -
>Response to JDBC.
In the above scenario if it fails at calling the webservice we will use restart BPM. It will go thru perfectly. But in your case the sender itself is synchronous.So I doubt!!!
Please wait for other friends replies!! It will help you.
Best regards,
raj.

No messages in BP2BP scenario

Hello.
We are using a copy of the default BP2BP scenario in B1iSN. A few days ago we were able to snychronize a few thousand Business Partners from one B1 company to another B1 company.
As of yesterday we no longer see messages in the message log for the BP object type. In the B1 Event Monitor however all events are recorded.
The technical error monitor shows this error:
com.sap.b1i.xcellerator.XcelleratorException: XCE001 Nested exception: com.sap.b1i.bizprocessor.BizProcException: BPE001 Nested exception: com.sap.b1i.utilities.UtilException: UTE001 Nested exception: com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.ParserException: Invalid char #0x6(:main:, row:35, col:9280)
What can cause this?
Thanks in advance,
Dominik

HI,
YOur answer is near to my problem . Can i ask you more detailed.
I am not getting messages in SXMB_ADM. So i configured in Integration server in ECC & XI system.
IN ECC , i am using two clients, dev & testing - so in which client i have to do configuration ? and What is the role of the business system in ECC ( Integration Server or Application server )???
IN XI, i am using only one client 100...so i have done. here i have given Role of business system - HUB Integration Server.and corresponding destination http://host:port/sap/xi/engine?type=entry
And while creating business systems in SLD...
for XDC...i have given path http://host:port/sap/xi/engine?type=entry
for EDCClient105...how can i create for proxy ...Adaper XI? is it type -
WEB AS ABAP?
pls reply for my mesaages?

ACK Aleaud messages in IDoc2IDoc scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for