Acknowledgement for validation error.

Hi,
I have configured two trading partners Acme & Globalchips over Rosettanet Pip3A4 standard.
the configuration is running fine for both Order Request and Order Confirmation.
For a typical scenario when i am turning validation ON at the Globalchip side ,and send an invalid Pip3A4 request message.
I am getting Validation error at Globalchips, i want to Globalchips to acknowledge this error to Acme which is not happening now.
State of the request at the ACME end is "Wait ACK".
Acme should get an exception acknowledgement that a validation error has occured.This is our requiremnt.
Please Suggest .
Thanks & Regards
Sachin Rathi

Hi Ramesh,
I have captured the logs in the debug mode for the realtime scenario and forwarded to "dheeraj".
Where trading partner Acme and Globalchips are replaced by BTGS and COMSTOR.
COMSTOR is sending BTGS a Pip3A4 Purchase Order Confirmation xml which is invalid.
It raise an exception "General VAlidation Error" at BTGS.
however BTGS is not able to acknowledge this exception to COMSTOR.
due to which the state of transaction in Comstor is Wait ACK.
Please let us know if u want any further inputs.
Thanks & Regards
Sachin Rathi

Similar Messages

No message for validation error "format", type "date", field "date-expired"

Dear
Guys,
i am getting the following error : ((No message for validation error "format", type "date", field "date-expired"))
When trying to upload adobe connect 7 license to the adobe connect 7 configuration wizard. the problem occurs because my server was install on Arabic Saudi Arabia date format while installation, but if i change the windows date format to US then the problem still occurs, and formatting windows is not possible, could anybody help??
Regards

Thank you for replying,
No i am not on host mode, a have installed it deferent times ago successfully, but the only problem now is that during the installation windows server 2008 the default language, time and date. Was set Arabic Saudi Arabia. And even changing it does not solve the problem, as i mentioned above.

FA/997 for Validation Error

Hi All,
I need some clarification on receiving the 997/FA for the Validation error that happens at the remote trading partner.
Will the 997 payload contain the details of the error in it??
How will B2B interpret the FA as positive FA or negative FA?
In my case the payload which I am sending is getting validation error at receiving side, they are sending me the FA. But in my side, both the initial transaction and the ack transaction goes to MSG_Completed state. Is it a normal behavior?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Monica

Hi,
1. The 997 has fields which will tell if the EDI transactions has SNIP errors. In your case, the outbound EDI should goto MSG_ERROR.
2. In a 999 transaction, the fields such as AK9, IK4, IK5 will tell the problem in the EDI, I am sure 997 should also have something like that.

Crystal report for visual studio 2010 data source object is not valid error

Hello,
I receive an "data source object is not valid" error when I want to print one CR document after setting an ADODB.Recordset on SetDataSource method of my report.
On my developer station, this operation works without problem but on client station, I get this error.
The redistributable package for client is installed on client side (CRRuntime_32bit_13_0_1.msi).
Can someone help me?
Thank you.

Thank's for your answers
Dim rsPkLst As ADODB.Recordset = Nothing
Dim report As New crPickingList
' Fill ADODB.Recordset with SQL Statment
If rsPkLst.RecordCount > 0 Then
report.SetDataSource(rsPkLst) ' Error : The data source object is invalid
EndIf
This error appears during "report.SetDataSource(rsPkLst)" instruction.
ADODB drivers are already installed and my ADODB.Recordset is filled with good records.
This project is an updated project from Visual Studio 2003 to Visual studio 2010 and the old version was running fine.
Developer and client station runs under Windows XP SP3.
On developer side I install CRforVS_13_0_1 (BuildVersion=13.0.1.220.Cortez_CR4VS).
On client side I install CRRuntime_32bit_13_0_1.msi.
Both stations use Microsoft .Net Framework 4.
Move to ADO.NET is a solution but, for the moment, I do not have the time to change all applications from my company.
(I get this error from all application updated from VS 2003 to VS 2010 developed since 2005)
David.

Error while posting the ID for Validation

Hello Experts,
We are running a report from a ECC 6.0 server which connects to the PI server via RFC connection defined through RFC Adapter on the PI server. This Pi server then connects to the web server for validation and then returns the status as true or false. But while executing the report on the ECC 6.0 server we are getting the error as " Sender Agreement not found:lookup of binding via CPA-cache failed for Adapter type RFC, AdapterNS http://sap.com/xi/XI/Sy". The connection test for the RFC from the ECC 6.0 server is fine and okay.
When we get this error we keep trying to validate the ID twicw and third time the transaction happens sucessfully. How do we overcome this error? While creating the communication channel for this scenario on the PI server the * has been removed from the Party field as suggested in one of the blogs in this forum. But in our case the problem still persists even after removing the * in the party field in the Communication channel of the scenario. Kindly suggest the remedy for this problem.
Thanks
Best Regards
PI team

Hi,
You could have an issue because the RFC definition has changed and the cache is out-of-synch
1) Reimport and activate the RFC.
2) Restart the RFC Adapter service in the Visual Administrator. This will flush the metadata cache in case the RFC has changed.
If this doesn't work, verify that your Sender Agreement is setup correctly
1) A common mistake is to create a Message Interface in the IR (Design) for RFC and IDoc senders and point the sender agreement to this Message Interface which won't work. The Sender Agreement should be setup as follows:
Service: SAP Business System
Interface: RFC name
Namespace: urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions
please go through below threads,
senderAgreement not found - PLEASE read
Error: Sender agreement not found, lookup of binding via CPA-CACHE failed.
regards,
ganesh.

Regarding Error message in ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST badi for validation.

hi Friends,
I am Using ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST badi for validation in Purchase order (ME21N),
For that I implemented PROCESS_ITEM method which fires during each row now i add another validation in same implementation for plant should be same through out the all line item. Now following code is woking fine but when for second line item user changese plant then it shows error message as per logic which is fine but even after changing plant to correct one the error message is still coming why is it so?
following is my current validation code
method IF_EX_ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST~PROCESS_ITEM.
DATA:ls_poitem TYPE mepoitem,
       ls_poitem_set TYPE mepoitem.
DATA:ls_poheader TYPE MEPOHEADER.
DATA:lm_poheader TYPE ref to IF_PURCHASE_ORDER_MM.
DATA:w_mara TYPE mara.
DATA:IT_ZMMTBL039 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF ZMMTBL039 ,
       WA_ZMMTBL039 TYPE ZMMTBL039 .
DATA:ls_poitem1 TYPE mepoitem.
DATA:V_KUNNR1 TYPE KNA1-KUNNR.
DATA:V_KUNNR2 TYPE KNA1-KUNNR.
DATA:W_WERKS(4),
       w_werks_tmp(4),
       w_flag(1).
ls_poitem = im_item->get_data( ).
lm_poheader = im_item->GET_HEADER( ).
ls_poheader = lm_poheader->GET_DATA( ).
IF ls_poitem-werks IS NOT INITIAL.
    w_werks = ls_poitem-werks.
    import w_flag to w_flag from MEMORY ID 'FLAG'.
    if w_flag is initial.
      w_flag = 'X'.
      EXPORT w_werks_tmp FROM w_werks TO MEMORY ID 'MEMO1'.
      export w_flag from w_flag to MEMORY ID 'FLAG'.
      clear: w_flag.
    endif.
ENDIF.
IMPORT w_werks_tmp TO w_werks FROM MEMORY ID 'MEMO1'.
break swaroopb.
IF ls_poitem-werks NE w_werks.
      MESSAGE E010(zparts) with 'Different plants are not allowed in single PO.'.
ENDIF.
CLEAR: WA_ZMMTBL039,w_mara.
REFRESH:IT_ZMMTBL039[] .
SELECT *
    INTO TABLE IT_ZMMTBL039
    FROM ZMMTBL039
   WHERE bsart EQ ls_poheader-bsart.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
    CLEAR: WA_ZMMTBL039,w_mara.
    SELECT SINGLE *
      INTO w_mara
      FROM mara
     WHERE matnr EQ ls_poitem-MATNR.
    IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
      READ TABLE IT_ZMMTBL039 INTO WA_ZMMTBL039 WITH KEY bsart = ls_poheader-bsart
                                                          mtart = w_mara-mtart
                                                          spart = w_mara-spart.
      IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
        MESSAGE E009(zparts) WITH ls_poitem-MATNR w_mara-spart ls_poheader-bsart .
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
end method

Hello Swarup
Since you want to compare all items together (having the same plant) I would suggest to implement this logic either in method CHECK or POST of the interface.
However, if you want to make your checks within the PROCESS_ITEM method then you should change your logic.
It does not make sense to work with the ABAP memory within a BAdI implementing class because the class itself is your "memory".
I would use the following logic to implement your validation:
lo_poheader = im_item->get_header( ). " retrieve header instance
lt_items = lo_poheader->get_items( ).   " retrieve all items
ls_detail_x = im_item->get_detail( ). " details of currently processed item
LOOP AT lt_items INTO ls_item.
    ls_detail = ls_item-item->get_detail( ).
    IF ( ls_detail-werks NE ls_detail_x-werks ). " validation failed
    " do something...
   ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
However, I would prefer to do this kind of validation in CHECK or POST method.
Regards,
Uwe

Validation error for tag cfloop

Hi All,
Complete newbie to CF here. I've inherited (or bought) an online business which has its site written in CF. I haven't done this sort of stuff before but do work SQL for a living and object oriented stuff plus have done a bit of html and php so CF isn't mind blowing to me (in its simple form).
I've downloaded my site on to my computer to run a local copy that I can hack to pieces if needs be. For some reason, I have a few problems with the site running locally. The first error I'm getting is a Attribute validation error for tag cfloop.
Basically, index.cfm has this bit of code in it:
<cfinvoke component="#datasets#" method="storedProcedure" returnvariable="getFeaturedWineries_qry">
    <cfinvokeargument name="storedProcedure" value="usp_GetFeaturedWineries">
</cfinvoke>
Ok, easy enough. Anyway, there's a call down the page to:
<cfinclude template = "#REQUEST.CFMPath#includes/displayFeaturedWineries.cfm">
Within displayFeaturedWineries.cfm is the code that calls the stored proc invoked above:
<cfloop query="getFeaturedWineries_qry" startrow="1" endrow="2">
Bam, that's where the error occurs. "The value of the attribute query, which is currently getFeaturedWineries_qry, is invalid.
What??? The stored proc exists and it only returns two records (which begs me to wonder why you would have startrow and endrow but anyway, it doesn't work with or without it).
The other interesting thing is that this works on production, NO PROBLEM!!! WTF? How can it work on production but not locally.
The only thing I'm starting to think is:
a) I've missed a setting somewhere in CF or
b) I'm running Apache as compared to IIS or
c) I'm running SQL 2008 and CF 9 which will no doubt be different to the production host server.
Should B or C be causing THAT type of problem??
Thanks,
Matt

I'm not sure what code apart from the above is going to show you what you could possibly need to solve this, but here goes. The following is only snippets of the code, but they are the relavant snippets. Other stored procs work. The cfdump for getFeaturedWineries_qry shows 'usp_getFeaturedWineries'. I know its there because I've been unable to run "EXEC usp_getFeaturedWineries" after copying it straight out of the code. As previously stated, there are other stored procs which are running fine.
datasets.cfc
    <cffunction name="storedProcedure">
        <cfargument name="storedProcedure" required="Yes" type="string">
        <cfstoredproc procedure = "#ARGUMENTS.storedProcedure#"
                      datasource = "#REQUEST.DSN_NAME#"
                      username   = "#REQUEST.DSN_USER#"
                      password   = "#REQUEST.DSN_PASS#"
                      returncode = "Yes">
            <cfprocresult name="storedProcedure" resultset="1">
        </cfstoredproc>
        <cfreturn storedProcedure>
    </cffunction>
application.cfm
    
    <cfset DSN_NAME = "boutiqueWineriesTest">
    <cfset DSN_USER = "coldfusion">
    <cfset DSN_PASS = "coldfusion">
index.cfm
<cfobject component="#COMP_REF#.datasets" name="datasets">
<cfinvoke component="#datasets#" method="storedProcedure" returnvariable="getFeaturedWineries_qry">
    <cfinvokeargument name="storedProcedure" value="usp_getFeaturedWineries">
</cfinvoke>
<cfinclude template = "#REQUEST.CFMPath#includes/displayFeaturedWineries.cfm">
displayFeaturedWineries.cfm
         <cfloop query="getFeaturedWineries_qry" startrow="1" endrow="2">
Attribute validation error for tag cfloop.
The value of the attribute query, which is currently getFeaturedWineries_qry, is invalid.                                                                                  The error occurred in C:\apps\iishome\includes\displayFeaturedWineries.cfm: line 33
Called from C:\apps\iishome\index.cfm: line 399
Called from C:\apps\iishome\index.cfm: line 79
Called from C:\apps\iishome\index.cfm: line 1
31 :      <tr>
32 :           <td width="626" colspan="3" class="productCenter_bg2">
33 :          <cfloop query="getFeaturedWineries_qry" startrow="1" endrow="2">
34 :              <div class="productCennews">
35 :                  <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">

Validation error for non-null throws false error condition

I am trying to perform a DML (INSERT) with a form element (textbox) that has been disabled on the form.
The objective is to allow the user to:
1) disable a form element using javascript when a radio element is selected - works OK using an onclick event
2) user clicks a button to ENTER (perform a INSERT DML) - here the validation throws an error but I have enabled the previously disabled form element and I have used $x_Value() to input a value into the form element by onsubmit event on button.
If I remove the validation error trap the DML saves the appropriate value.
I can create two buttons and it works:
1 button to enable fields that were previously disabled
2 button to perform DML. (works if after button 1 I set focus on any form field with my mouse.)
Any help would be appreciated.
marshall

Knight,
Thanks for your interest in helping.
I am trying not to create a situation w/bugs and such. I think I can devise a work around but I would like a more "correct" solution. ;-)
To explain what I am doing I have a form that a person can use to enter a complaint. The person can give their last - middle - first name but they can also decide to be anonymous. If anonymous they click checkbox. Onclick of checkbox I fire javascript to disable name fields and place "Anonymous" in the last_name disabled field. The user can enter other data and when the user clicks ENTER I want to insert into the DB but the validation error trap of APEX sees a disabled field as a null. I want to place "Anonymous" in the last name field and then save the record with other data besides name.
To add to it - I can create two buttons 1-button enables and 2-button inserts and the same code works if I touch( give focus) to a field in between enabling and inserting into the DB
Does that help explain better.
Thanks again - hope you or someone can help - best regards.

Custom Error Message for Validation.....

Here is my Validation:
I want the error which is grown from what is wrong on the page to display after the validation.
the GUI for validation will not let me leave the Validation ERROR box empty...just not sure how to get around this.
DECLARE
isValid BOOLEAN := TRUE;
message VARCHAR2(4000):='';
BEGIN
if (:P14_EXISTING_METRIC_NAME IS NULL and :P14_METRIC_NAME IS NULL)
then
message := 'Metric Name is Not Chosen:';
isValid := FALSE;
end if;
if   (:P14_EXISTING_SUB_VALUE IS NULL and :P14_METRIC_SUBNAME IS NULL)
then
message := message || ' Sub Metric Name is Not Chosen:';
isValid := FALSE;
end if;
if NOT REGEXP_LIKE(:P14_METRIC_VALUE,'expression')
then
message := message || ' Value is not Numeric:';
isValid := FALSE;
end if;
if NOT isValid
then
   raise_application_error (-20001,message);
end if;
END;Edited by: bostonmacosx on Feb 27, 2013 12:05 PM

SO what I did was make sure that the process doesn't go false:
and at the end just checked my messages and added an error on the end. WHEW hope this helps someone in the future.
DECLARE
isValid BOOLEAN := TRUE;
message VARCHAR2(4000):=NULL;
BEGIN
if (:P14_EXISTING_METRIC_NAME IS NULL and :P14_METRIC_NAME IS NULL)
then
message := 'Metric Name is Not Chosen<BR>';
end if;
if   (:P14_EXISTING_SUB_VALUE IS NULL and :P14_METRIC_SUBNAME IS NULL)
then
message := message || ' Sub Metric Name is Not Chosen<BR>';
end if;
if (NOT REGEXP_LIKE(:P14_METRIC_VALUE,'^(\d{1,99})\.(\d{0,99})$') or :P14_METRIC_VALUE IS NULL)
then
message := message || ' Value is not Numeric<BR>';
end if;
if message IS NOT NULL
then
apex_error.add_error (
        p_message          => message,
        p_display_location => apex_error.c_inline_in_notification );
end if;
END;Edited by: bostonmacosx on Feb 27, 2013 12:52 PM

Getting Validation Error at B2B Console for 856 Outbound B2B-51507

Hi,
We are getting this error while sending the EDI 856 in an outgoing Process. We are getting the data from Oracle Apps and sending it to B2B via B2b adapter using mediator.
we are using X856 ecx file and X856 xsd.
Can Anyone help in this. If Anyone is having any idea please help us on this.
Do we need to set the Deployment Validation Property to False? If yes then is it in EM we need to Set?
Appreciate quick response.
Below is the error details:
Id 0AF6038D12BE3AE21CF0000011881680
Message Id 0AF6038D12BE3AE1C5E0000011881630
Refer To Message Refer To Message
Sender Type Specialties
Receiver Type Name
Receiver Value XXXX_4010
Sender Sybron Dental Specialties
Receiver :XXXX_4010
Agreement Id:XXXXXXX
Agreement HEN_KRR_AGR
Document Type 856
Document Protocol EDI_X12
Document Version 4010
Message Type REQ
Direction OUTBOUND
State MSG_ERROR
Acknowledgement Mode NONE
Response Mode NONE
Send Time Stamp Monday, October 25, 2010 6:57:41 AM GMT-07:00
Receive Time Stamp Monday, October 25, 2010 6:57:41 AM GMT-07:00
Document Retry Interval 0
Document Remaining Retry 0
Native Message Size
Translated Message Size 3811
Business Action Name
Business Transaction Name
Xpath Name1 XPathName1
Xpath Value1
Xpath Expression1
Xpath Name2 XPathName2
Xpath Value2
Xpath Expression2
Xpath Name3 XPathName3
Xpath Value3
Xpath Expression3
Correlation From XPath Name CorrelationFromXPathName
Correlation From XPath Value
Correlation From XPath Expression
Correlation To XPath Name CorrelationToXPathName
Correlation To XPath Value
Correlation To XPath Expression
Wire Message Wire Message
Application Message Application Message
Payload Storage Payload Storage
Attachment Attachment
Label soa_b2b_ - Fri Oct 22 04:32:37 PDT 2010
Collaboration Id 0AF6038D12BE3AE205B0000011881670
Collabration Name
Collabration Version
Business Action Name
Exchange Protocol Name Generic File
Exchange Protocol Version 1.0
Interchange Control Number
Group Control Number
Transaction Set Control Number
Error Code B2B-51507
Error Description Machine Info: (org-vmsosoa.sds.sybrondental.com) Description: Payload validation error.
Error Level ERROR_LEVEL_COLLABORATION
Error Severity ERROR
Error Text Error Brief : XEngine error.
This is the Application Message we are getting in Error Details:
Document Type 856
Document Definition 856_DocDefHENK
Document Protocol Name EDI_X12
Document Protocol Version 4010
Refer To Application Message Id Refer To Application Message Id
App Conversation Id
App Message property {tracking.compositeInstanceId=11, b2b.documentProtocolVersion=4010, b2b.toTradingPartnerId=HEN_KRR_4010, tracking.ecid=0000IjZLVsfDCgS5IFc9yf1ChDOY0034Rz, b2b.fromTradingPartnerId=Sybron Dental Specialties, tracking.conversationId=BPEL, tracking.compositeInstanceCreatedTime=Mon Oct 25 06:57:39 PDT 2010, tracking.parentComponentInstanceId=mediator:D4A7EA60E03F11DFBFC66D8172AE9492, MESH_METRICS=null, b2b.documentTypeName=856, tracking.parentReferenceId=mediator:D4A7EA60E03F11DFBFC66D8172AE9492:D4AC5730E03F11DFBFC66D8172AE9492:oneway}
Direction OUTBOUND
State MSG_ERROR
Error Code B2B-51507
Error Text Error Brief : XEngine error.
Error Description Error : Mandatory attribute missing: Standard.
Created Date Monday, October 25, 2010 6:57:40 AM GMT-07:00
Modified Date Monday, October 25, 2010 6:57:41 AM GMT-07:00
Message Size 3811
Payload Payload
Business Message Business Message
Retry Interval 0
Reattempt Count 0
Remaining Retry 0
ECID 0000IjZLVsfDCgS5IFc9yf1ChDOY0034Rz
Composite Instance Id 11
Parent Composite Instance Id mediator:D4A7EA60E03F11DFBFC66D8172AE9492
Conversation Id BPEL
Domain Name default
Composite Name Generate856ASNOutbound
Composite Version 2.0
Reference Name B2B_GetData

Hi,
It looks like , Payload is not valid as per the ecs/xsd so B2B is giving Payload validation Error.
If Validation is must then validate the payload against ecs/xsd offline and correct.
or you can turn off validation in Agreement (Validation = false) and redeploy the agreement.
Rgds,
Nitesh Jain

Need help... Context validation error for tag cfscript.

Code:
    <cffunction name="computeHash" access="public" returntype="String">
      <cfargument name="password" type="string" />
      <cfargument name="salt" type="string" />
      <cfargument name="iterations" type="numeric" required="false" default="1024" />
      <cfargument name="algorithm" type="string" required="false" default="SHA512" />
      <cfscript>
        var hashed = '';
        var i = 1;
        hashed = hash( password & salt, arguments.algorithm, 'UTF-8' );
        for (i = 1; i <= iterations; i++) {
          hashed = hash( hashed & salt, arguments.algorithm, 'UTF-8' );
        return hashed;
      </cfscript>
    </cffunction>
Error on web app:
Context validation error for tag cfscript.
The start tag must have a matching end tag. An explicit end tag can be provided by adding </cfscript>. If the body of the tag is empty you can use the shortcut <cfscript .../>. The CFML compiler was processing:
a cfscript tag beginning on line 11, column 12.
a cfscript tag beginning on line 11, column 12.
The error occurred in xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\salty.cfc: line 11
9 :        <cfargument name="iterations" type="numeric" required="false" default="1024" />
10 :        <cfargument name="algorithm" type="string" required="false" default="SHA512" />
11 :        <cfscript>
12 :           var hashed = '';
13 :           var i = 1;
I am completely lost on why it's fumbling with why it says there's no closing tag. Help!!!!
Thanks

What's on lines 1-7 of that file?
That code compiles fine for me on CF8 & CF9, so that's not where the error is.
You're not trying to compile it on any earlier version of CF than CF8 are you? The < and ++ operators are not valid prior to CF8. CFMX7 might see the < as a stray angle bracket, and get confused. I don't have CFMX7 running here to test the exact error that would produce, sorry.
Adam

Health Check Error: Dependency$ p_timestamp mismatch for VALID objects

Just before the upgrade when we ran the health check we got the following 8 errors and want to fix them.
Dependency$ p_timestamp mismatch for VALID objects
[E] - P_OBJ#=5015556 D_OBJ#=5015647
[E] - P_OBJ#=5015556 D_OBJ#=8432965
[E] - P_OBJ#=5015576 D_OBJ#=5015647
[E] - P_OBJ#=5015576 D_OBJ#=8432965
[E] - P_OBJ#=5015588 D_OBJ#=5015647
[E] - P_OBJ#=5015588 D_OBJ#=8432965
[E] - P_OBJ#=5015589 D_OBJ#=5015647
[E] - P_OBJ#=5015589 D_OBJ#=8432965
SELECT o.obj# d_obj, do.name d_name, do.type# d_type, po.obj# p_obj, po.name p_name, to_char(p_timestamp,'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') "P_Timestamp",
to_char(po.stime ,'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') "STIME", decode(sign(po.stime-p_timestamp),0,'SAME','*DIFFER*') X FROM sys.obj$ do, sys.dependency$ d, sys.obj$ po WHERE
P_OBJ#=po.obj#(+) AND D_OBJ#=do.obj# AND do.status=1 /*dependent is valid*/ AND po.status=1 /*parent is valid*/ AND po.stime!=p_timestamp /*parent timestamp not match*/ ORDER BY 2,1;
8432965 AQ$_KUPC$DATAPUMP_QUETAB_P 2 5015576KUPC$_API_ACK09-DEC-2009 14:01:28 29-NOV-2010 12:04:14*DIFFER*
8432965 AQ$_KUPC$DATAPUMP_QUETAB_P 2 5015589KUPC$_MASTERJOBINFO 09-DEC-2009 14:01:28 29-NOV-2010 12:04:14*DIFFER*
8432965 AQ$_KUPC$DATAPUMP_QUETAB_P 2 5015556KUPC$_LOGENTRIES 09-DEC-2009 14:01:27 29-NOV-2010 12:04:13*DIFFER*
8432965 AQ$_KUPC$DATAPUMP_QUETAB_P 2 5015588KUPC$_MASTERERROR 09-DEC-2009 14:01:28 29-NOV-2010 12:04:14*DIFFER*
5015647 KUPC$DATAPUMP_QUETAB 2 5015576KUPC$_API_ACK 09-DEC-2009 14:01:28 29-NOV-2010 12:04:14*DIFFER*
5015647 KUPC$DATAPUMP_QUETAB 2 5015589KUPC$_MASTERJOBINFO 09-DEC-2009 14:01:28 29-NOV-2010 12:04:14*DIFFER*
5015647 KUPC$DATAPUMP_QUETAB 2 5015556KUPC$_LOGENTRIES 09-DEC-2009 14:01:27 29-NOV-2010 12:04:13*DIFFER*
5015647 KUPC$DATAPUMP_QUETAB 2 5015588KUPC$_MASTERERROR 09-DEC-2009 14:01:28 29-NOV-2010 12:04:14*DIFFER*
Solution as per the 579256.1's is
The returning objects will have to be recompiled or recreated to clear the problem.
Please see Note 781959.1 to recompile them. This can cause problems during upgrade and PLSQL validation.
But in my case above objects are not synonyms and are of type=2.
So, not sure how to fix them. pl. let us know how we can fix these errors.

Well, I can tell you that this kind of error is not OS related, but rather a HW thing. It happens where there is a general detection of something going wrong. Sometimes it can happen randomly and might not be an indication of a problem. But sometimes it can be caused by things that are improperly functioning within the system like bad capacitors.
Unfortunately I don't really know what to do about such things except give you machine a proper inspection. But if things are working fine, and continue to do so, I wouldn't worry about it. If it becomes a regular occurance, then I'd worry.

Order of the validation error for mandatory properties

Hi,
I have created mandatory Properties in KM Configuration.I have configured in such a way that the properties are shown while uploading a file.Now when I upload a file without filling the properties it shows the validation error for the properties but it is not shown in the order of the properties mentioned in the property Groups.
Everytime the error is shown in a random order.
Please advise me whether I am missing something in the configuration.
Thanks in advance
Sowjanya.

Hi,
is it possible, that someone inserted data with a different GC as parameter than your actual group currency is?
otherwise: I had the same problem, but I actually don't know the reason. I changed the validation rule:
before i had: VAL_YTD( write-offs cap. assets BS ) = VAL_YTD( write-offs PL)
now i have: ABS( VAL_YTD( write-offs cap. assets BS ) ) = ABS( VAL_YTD( write-offs PL) )
ABS = absolute value (no sign, only values).
You could also do it like that: ABS( VAL_YTD( write-offs cap. assets BS ) ) - ABS( VAL_YTD( write-offs PL) ) = 0
PS: To have the amount 0 in a validation rule is a restricted perspective. Never forget that!
Not only for the validation - it is always absolutely important to make sure which perspective you have choosen. Check the parameters, check the rules, the selections etc.
BR

Business Partner - Error for validity periods of addresses R11244

We are using ECC transaction BP, and we are facing the error "Error for validity periods of addresses" when we tried to change a business Partner.
Error for validity periods of addresses
Message no. R11244

Check the following notes:-
1) Note 882726 - SAP BP: Error message R11 244 (BP Transaction + BAPIs)
2) Note 1380576 - ECC BP to CRM BP address repln fails due to validity periods
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Validation Error not showing properly for a textfield

Hi,
I have a text field as a column of the table. When I focus out of the text field, the field becomes red due to validation error. But it doesn't show the validation error message.
When you click on the field which is red, it shows the error msg as a bubble or when you try to save the record, the error msg popup shows up.
Now, I want the user to see the error message as soon as he tabs out of the field, does any one know how to achieve this ?
Thanks,
Akshay

Akshay,
Always mention your JDev version.
Have you tried adding an af:messages tag for your page and set the inline property of that to true?
-Arun

Acknowledgement for validation error.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for