Health Check Error: Dependency$ p_timestamp mismatch for VALID objects

Just before the upgrade when we ran the health check we got the following 8 errors and want to fix them.
Dependency$ p_timestamp mismatch for VALID objects
[E] - P_OBJ#=5015556 D_OBJ#=5015647
[E] - P_OBJ#=5015556 D_OBJ#=8432965
[E] - P_OBJ#=5015576 D_OBJ#=5015647
[E] - P_OBJ#=5015576 D_OBJ#=8432965
[E] - P_OBJ#=5015588 D_OBJ#=5015647
[E] - P_OBJ#=5015588 D_OBJ#=8432965
[E] - P_OBJ#=5015589 D_OBJ#=5015647
[E] - P_OBJ#=5015589 D_OBJ#=8432965
SELECT o.obj# d_obj, do.name d_name, do.type# d_type, po.obj# p_obj, po.name p_name, to_char(p_timestamp,'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') "P_Timestamp",
to_char(po.stime ,'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') "STIME", decode(sign(po.stime-p_timestamp),0,'SAME','*DIFFER*') X FROM sys.obj$ do, sys.dependency$ d, sys.obj$ po WHERE
P_OBJ#=po.obj#(+) AND D_OBJ#=do.obj# AND do.status=1 /*dependent is valid*/ AND po.status=1 /*parent is valid*/ AND po.stime!=p_timestamp /*parent timestamp not match*/ ORDER BY 2,1;
8432965 AQ$_KUPC$DATAPUMP_QUETAB_P 2 5015576KUPC$_API_ACK09-DEC-2009 14:01:28 29-NOV-2010 12:04:14*DIFFER*
8432965 AQ$_KUPC$DATAPUMP_QUETAB_P 2 5015589KUPC$_MASTERJOBINFO 09-DEC-2009 14:01:28 29-NOV-2010 12:04:14*DIFFER*
8432965 AQ$_KUPC$DATAPUMP_QUETAB_P 2 5015556KUPC$_LOGENTRIES 09-DEC-2009 14:01:27 29-NOV-2010 12:04:13*DIFFER*
8432965 AQ$_KUPC$DATAPUMP_QUETAB_P 2 5015588KUPC$_MASTERERROR 09-DEC-2009 14:01:28 29-NOV-2010 12:04:14*DIFFER*
5015647 KUPC$DATAPUMP_QUETAB 2 5015576KUPC$_API_ACK 09-DEC-2009 14:01:28 29-NOV-2010 12:04:14*DIFFER*
5015647 KUPC$DATAPUMP_QUETAB 2 5015589KUPC$_MASTERJOBINFO 09-DEC-2009 14:01:28 29-NOV-2010 12:04:14*DIFFER*
5015647 KUPC$DATAPUMP_QUETAB 2 5015556KUPC$_LOGENTRIES 09-DEC-2009 14:01:27 29-NOV-2010 12:04:13*DIFFER*
5015647 KUPC$DATAPUMP_QUETAB 2 5015588KUPC$_MASTERERROR 09-DEC-2009 14:01:28 29-NOV-2010 12:04:14*DIFFER*
Solution as per the 579256.1's is
The returning objects will have to be recompiled or recreated to clear the problem.
Please see Note 781959.1 to recompile them. This can cause problems during upgrade and PLSQL validation.
But in my case above objects are not synonyms and are of type=2.
So, not sure how to fix them. pl. let us know how we can fix these errors.

Well, I can tell you that this kind of error is not OS related, but rather a HW thing. It happens where there is a general detection of something going wrong. Sometimes it can happen randomly and might not be an indication of a problem. But sometimes it can be caused by things that are improperly functioning within the system like bad capacitors.
Unfortunately I don't really know what to do about such things except give you machine a proper inspection. But if things are working fine, and continue to do so, I wouldn't worry about it. If it becomes a regular occurance, then I'd worry.

Similar Messages

RSMO: Health Check Error ORA-16820

Hello Everyone,
I'm trying to troubleshoot this weird error in our DG setup. I have FSFO enabled and observer running. However, when i check the status of standby database with show database 'stdby', i get ORA-16820, however, i do the same for primary database, status is success.
Already looked at DG logs, but not much help other than health check error with ORA 16820 FSFO observer is no longer observing this database.
Any pointers to troubleshoot is appreciated.
Thanks.
PS. 10.2.0.5/Linux 5.x
Edited by: user11241492 on May 11, 2011 5:24 PM

What does SHOW CONFIGURATION VERBOSE; return?
Larry

Error message when searching for an object link within EasyDMS

Hello,
I have a problem with the easydms system. Everything works fine except searching in the object links. When I want to define an object link and I don't know the name of the object I try to find it with the help of the search function within easydms (within the object links).
But the search always delivers an error message:
"Missing authorization check to display master data"
Does anybody now what to do?
Thank you for your help.
Best regards,
Markus Sigl

Hi Markus,
When you try to do this the BAPI 'BAPI_HELPVALUES_GET' is used. There are some authorization checks that are being performed for the object. These authorizations are maintained in the table BAPIF4T.
For the above said test data, you are trying to get the help values for
the relevant field (e.g. EBELN: po_number).However,in table BAPIF4T the corresponding authorization for the data element ebeln is not maintained. And so you are getting this error.
So, when you maintain the below record in the table BAPIF4T,you will
have the corresponding authorization and you will not get the error
anymore.
sample entry:
Object type - ' '
Object type component - ' '
BAPIF4T-DTEL - 'EBELN'
BAPIF4T-FNAM - 'PLM_HELPVALUES_AUTHCHECK'
Best regards,
Christoph

Upgrade - Health Check Error

Hi All, I am upgrading the site collection which has NO workflow implemented in 2010. When I am doing health check before the upgrade I am getting this
•<websiteUrl>/_catalogs/wfpub/Approval - SharePoint 2010/ReviewApproval_1033.vdw - Reset page to default
•<websiteUrl>/entsearch/Pages/peopleresults.aspx - Reset page to default
•<websiteUrl>/_catalogs/wfpub/Collect Feedback - SharePoint 2010/ReviewFeedback_1033.xoml.wfconfig.xml - Reset page to default
•<websiteUrl>/_catalogs/wfpub/Approval - SharePoint 2010/ReviewApproval_1033.xoml.wfconfig.xml - Reset page to default
•<websiteUrl>/_catalogs/wfpub/Collect Feedback - SharePoint 2010/ReviewFeedback_1033.vdw - Reset page to default
•<websiteUrl>/_catalogs/wfpub/Collect Signatures - SharePoint 2010/Signatures_1033.vdw - Reset page to default
•<websiteUrl>/entsearch/Pages/results.aspx - Reset page to default
•<websiteUrl>/_catalogs/wfpub/Collect Signatures - SharePoint 2010/Signatures_1033.xoml.wfconfig.xml - Reset page to default
•<websiteUrl>/Education Documents/Forms/template.dotx - Reset page to default
•<websiteUrl>/_catalogs/masterpage/VariationRootPageLayout.aspx - Reset page to default
What is this error about? Should I proceed the upgrade with this error or resolve?
Please advice.
Regards,
Khushi
Khushi

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you got “Reset page to default” error in Health Check.
If you haven't customize any workflow or anything, you can just reset them to the default, it’s OK.
Because in the database the sourse pages were completely uncustomized, out of the box.
So, you can reset them to the default, then check with Health Check, it would no error again.
http://www.chrismcnulty.net/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=113
Thanks & Regards,
Jason
Jason Guo
TechNet Community Support

CDS Data Quality Health Check Error -(Code: 207,103)

Using the CDS Individual Data Quality Health Check.
Created a new data source, snap shot and mapping. Cloned the job and modified the snapshot an mapping. Ran the Job and go the following :An error occurred whilst creating task '[I2A] Profile Individual Misc Data' : Failed to load process "[I2A] Profile Individual Misc Data" (Code: 207,103) - Any Suggestions

Determined the Error to be a missing processor. I must have deleted it by mistake. You can identify which one is missing by the processor Name [I2A] Profile Individual Misc Data

CRM IBASE mismatch for Connection object - premise

Hi Experts,
In our ECC system we have a two connection objects connected to two different premises. While in CRM if I go to IBASE of Connection object 1 we get both premises attached to it and the connection object 2 does not show any premises. I would request help in correcting this. I am very new to CRM and have little knowledge of how this works.
Thanks in Advance,
Hitesh

Solved!
Apparently after creating new IBase Component and new Product (assigned to the newly created IBase Component) it is required to execute transaction save and commit for the object of newly created Product. After that system sees newly created objects.
Required code (after creation of a new Product):
DATA:
lo_core TYPE REF TO cl_crm_bol_core,
lo_new_product TYPE REF TO cl_crm_bol_entity,
lo_factory TYPE REF TO cl_crm_bol_entity_factory,
lo_transaction TYPE REF TO if_bol_transaction_context.
lo_core = cl_crm_bol_core=>get_instance( ).
lo_factory = lo_core->get_entity_factory( 'Product' ).
lo_new_product = lo_factory->create( )
lo_transaction = lo_core->get_transaction( iv_entity = lo_new_product ).
lo_transaction->save( iv_force_save = abap_true ).
lo_transaction->commit( ).

Error code paper mismatch for photosmart D7560

trying to print checks but error code indicates paper mismatch, does not match paper size or type...just spits out my blank check

I had this problem for so long and finally figured it out. HP was no help except for the suggestion to switch it to "draft" quality.
Depending on your operating system, it will be different... but basically... get to your printer's preferences ... Click on the "Paper / Quality" tab... and make sure that "Paper Type" (XP) or "Output Quality" (Windows 7) is set to AUTOMATIC. That's it. In Windows 7 ... there are a little more steps ... For Windows 7 you might have to go to printing preferences, change media type to plain, click on advanced, and change "Output Quality" to AUTOMATIC. OH YEA... AND MAKE SURE TO CLICK "APPLY" AND NOT JUST "OK". It works like a charm. In Windows 7 The "Quality Settings" will automatically check the "Custom" checkbox when you put it on AUTOMATIC. That's good... that's the way you want it.. So, the Quality Settings "Custom" checkbox will be checked and you will see that "Normal" is still selected but it is grayed out. Hope this helps somebody. I was going to go on HP's site and tell them the same thing since they haven't figured it out yet, but I don't want to make a new account... I have too many accounts already. If someone has an HP customer blog account... feel free to copy and paste this in there if you want. Good Luck People .

ORA-4068 errors signaled for valid objects

hai friends,
kindly refer this link
Problem we faced is "ora-4068 error:- existing state of package is invalidated" in the client application.initiallly we have migrated from oracle 9i to 10g 10.2.0.4.0
we discussed and got solution as timestamp of objects may differ.( we are waiting for rights to access the table sys.obj$) pls refer the link
Re: oracle error -4068
But now we are advised from senior as below
1) ora-4068 error will come only when we recompile the view. is it true?
2) 6136074 bug is fixed in 10.2.0.4.0. is it?
Gurus give your valid suggestions
S

A: ora-4068 error:- existing state of package is invalidated

Packages tend to fail because of their "package state". A package has a "state" when it contains package level variables/constants etc. and the package is called. Upon first calling the package, the "state" is created in memory to hold the values of those variables etc. If an object that the package depends upon e.g. a table is altered in some way e.g. dropped and recreated, then because of the database dependencies, the package takes on an INVALID status. When you next make a call to the package, Oracle looks at the status and sees that it is invalid, then determines that the package has a "state". Because something has altered that the package depended upon, the state is taken as being out of date and is discarded, thus causing the "Package state has been discarded" error message.
If a package does not have package level variables etc. i.e. the "state" then, taking the same example above, the package takes on an INVALID status, but when you next make a call to the package, Oracle sees it as Invalid, but knows that there is no "state" attached to it, and so is able to recompile the package automatically and then carry on execution without causing any error messages. The only exception here is if the thing that the package was dependant on has changes in such a way that the package cannot compile, in which case you'll get an Invalid package type of error.
And if you want to know how to prevent discarded package states....
Move all constants and variables into a stand-alone package spec and reference those from your initial package. Thus when the status of your original package is invlidated for whatever reason, it has no package state and can be recompiled automatically, however the package containing the vars/const will not become invalidated as it has no dependencies, so the state that is in memory for that package will remain and can continue to be used.
As for having package level cursors, you'll need to make these local to the procedures/functions using them as... [Show more]
Read other 10 answers

How to check a Cluster Refnum (strict) for validity ?

I have a VI that loads a type def'd Cluster of data into a Front Panel Indicator from an INI file. I runs OK standalone.
I also want to use this VI as a subVI and to load a copy of the Cluster data into the calling VI using a Cluster Refum (strict) passed in by the calling VI. I can also get that to work.
The problem is that when the VI is run standalone, the Cluster Refnum (strict) input is invalid and I get an error 1055. How can I verify the validity of the Cluster Refnum (strict) input before I use it so that I can avoid the error 1055?
Thanks.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

You can use the Not a Number/Path/Refnum? primitive from the comparison palette to find if a reference is valid.
Try to take over the world!

Error of type mismatch for java proxy code

Hi All
I am writing code for server java proxies .I am trying to get the input parameters ,my code is as follows:
package testScenario;
public class MDMtoXIMI_PortTypeImpl extends com.sap.aii.proxy.xiruntime.core.AbstractProxy implements MDMtoXIMI_PortType {
    public void mDMtoXIMI(testScenario.JavaproxyINDT_Type javaproxyINMT) throws com.sap.aii.proxy.xiruntime.core.SystemFaultException, com.sap.aii.proxy.xiruntime.core.ApplicationFaultException{
          JavaproxyINDT_Type obj=new JavaproxyINDT_Type();
          return obj.getName();
       // throw new RuntimeException();
I am getting typemismatch for this piece of code:JavaproxyINDT_Type obj=new JavaproxyINDT_Type();
Can anybody help?

I think the Typemismatch is in the line with "return"
The method declaration is "void", so you cannot use return here.
You should modify the interface to "synchronous"
Regards
Stefan

Alerts - All Metrics Errors - Health Check - Collection Failure

I have database instances with Health Check - Collection Failures.
These errors are almost 30 days old. I originally received the Health Check errors because the credentials were not set properly. I then set them but the errors have not aged out.
Does anyone know how can I clear out the Health Check errors?
When I look at All Metrics, Health Check for one of these databases, the Last Upload date is very old.
Maybe I can I force a re-collection?

Hi ,
I had the same problem and posted the same ...question...
So , the link will help you to solve the problem
Clear the Alert list
unless somebody else has another idea...!!!!!!!!!!!
Regards and hope this will help,
Simon

Database Health Check Enquiry

Hi all,
Some enquires regarding database health check. I did some research regarding health check, got overwhelmed by the information available out there.
Currently I don't have any report on hand, but currently working and starting on one. This report serves as a report for reference, to understand if there's any database performance issue, and as a report for management.
Wish to check with you folks, what are the typical things that I can look at on a daily basis to understand my database health status, eg. Buffer Hitrate, database I/O etc, especially those that may/will contribute to impact on the database performance. Or is there any good reference link whereby I can do some readup regarding such a health check?
Thanks in advance for any input.
Eugene

Hi Eugene,
Well that's a pretty open question and I guess you will get a lot of replies which I look forward to monitoring as there should be some very interesting ones there.
Anyway, let me just open with one point that I have found very useful in the past. As regards Database Performance , you can look as much as you like at the statistics and a great deal of discretion is required in interpreting them but the real test for me of how well a database is performing is in terms of the user (or application) perception. Are the responses from the database good enough to meet the users expectations. Check the average response time for example and set guidellines for what is acceptable, very good response , very bad response etc.
I use this as a guideline so then once the database is perfoming in the sense that the user is satisfied (or better still happy with the performance) we can gather the statistics (from Oracle 10g onwards there are lots of tools built in like ADDM and AWR for gathering and storing the database statistics) and create baselines. Once we have baselines for a normally performing system, as soon as problems are reported we can run off a diagnostic tool like ADDM for that period , compare it against the baseline and look for the striking differences. From there we can start an analysis of individual numbers, buffer hit ratios etc. to delve further.
Hope this helps , I am sure lots of other people will chip in to this
Regards

Other tools/option to achieve Health check

Hi guys,
I saw that there are a lot threads open regarding health check.
I`m searching for an open source tool/commercial tool, manually created scripts that can check all oracle prerequisite (system information, oracle kernel parameters, packages) and Oracle database parameters. For performance analyze, top events, sql statements I stay on AWR or Statspack.
There are already softs that helps to do health check, operating systems prerequisite checks like, Toad, raccheck, rda but I want to know If there are any other great tools/scripts.

1010009 wrote:
Yes, you are right EM is the best tool for this. But I`m sure that there are a lot dba that have created ther own scripts/tool/method for a health check. I want to go to clients that have there own dbas, monitoring database with EM, use oracle scripts. Even if they is using the best tools, I want to come with something new that will run upon oracle server. The output I want to put in a document an make an assesment with reported issues and resolution.This demands the quote "why reinvent the wheel" ? So if I understood you correctly, you want to make a best-out-of-the-best tool isn't it? What makes you think that a tool made by a single person would be better than or even equivalent to 12C CC for example? There are scripts created (and there are some really good ones too) by the DBAs but Oracle is very strongly asking people to get shifted towards the GC/CC as the level of complexity within the database is increasing day by day and its just going to increase.
Aman....

Cin health check..

hi friends,
           can anyone tell me about cin health check,
                            i have ran the transaction cin health check, it is showing red for many conditions type..
             what might be the reason...

Hi
This program is to check the correctness of the customizing settings after completing
the customizing and before starting the testing
Red icon indicates wrong or no g/l assigned to these transaction types. check under log generaltax on goods movemntindiaaccount determination-Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
for ex:
Tax Condition - JMO2 / JAO2 / JS02 / JIP1 / JIP2
Account Key          = 'NVV'      - Non Deductable
G/L Accounts    is not blanks     - Attached to the account key
Tax not Deductable Flag = 'X'     - Settings in Account Key
Tax Type             = 2          - Input Tax - Settings in Account Key
Posting without Tax = *          - Settings in G/L Account Master
Tax Category         = '*' or '<' - Settings in G/L Account Master
Also just click on the info button in J1I0 to know more details.
Reg
Raja

Error: Ref count for this object is higher then 0

Hello All,
I am trying to create User Defined Tables in SAP through Coding but while running the code the error "Ref count for this object is higher then 0 " is showing .
I have created a temporary table in which the Table Description are stored as follows :-
Create Table Test_Table (TblCode Varchar(30),TblName Varchar(100),TblType int)
From this table then using recordset i am getting the table details for creation :-
oRecord.DoQuery("Select TblCode,TblName,TblType From Csv_UDT")
            While Not oRecord.EoF
                Dim Table_Id As String = oRecord.Fields.Item("TblCode").Value
                Dim Table_Name As String = oRecord.Fields.Item("TblName").Value
                Dim Table_Type As integer = oRecord.Fields.Item("TblType").Value
                Dim oUserTablesMD As SAPbobsCOM.UserTablesMD
                oUserTablesMD = Class_OprTbl_Main.ocompany.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oUserTables)
                '// set the table parameters
                oUserTablesMD.TableName = Table_Id
                oUserTablesMD.TableDescription = Table_Name
                oUserTablesMD.TableType = Table_Type
                lRetCode = oUserTablesMD.Add
                If lRetCode <> 0 Then
                    If lRetCode = -1 Then
                    Else
                        Class_OprTbl_Main.ocompany.GetLastError(lRetCode, sErrMsg)
                        Class_OprTbl_Main.SBO_Application.MessageBox(sErrMsg + oUserTablesMD.TableName)
                    End If
                End If
                System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ReleaseComObject(oUserTablesMD)
                oUserTablesMD = Nothing
But while running this code the error is coming .
How to solve this error ........
Thanks,
Amit

First of all, you are not meant to create temporary table in SAP database. SAP have never made an official announcement, but I think they would not be too happy if they saw it and may withdraw support. Just something to be aware of.
Secondly, your error is very common and you would have found the solution by searching the forum. It is caused by having an open recordset while trying to use a metadata object.
You will have to change how your code works. You can not use the UserFieldsMD or UserTablesMD object while you have an undisposed recordset object.
-1120 - Ref count for this object is higher then 0
Ref count for this object is higher then 0
Error: Ref count for this object is higher then 0
Meaning of Error Msg: "Ref count for this object is higher than 0"
The solution is you must dispose of any recordset object before attempting to use the UserTablesMD object:
System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ReleaseComObject(oRecordSet)
oRecordSet= Nothing
GC.Collect()
GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers()

Health Check Error: Dependency$ p_timestamp mismatch for VALID objects

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for