Activating Extended Withholding Tax - New Company Code

Hello Gurus, I have a question regarding Extended Withholding Tax that I have not previously seen addressed.
My client is live on ECC 6.0 EHP 5 and would like to activate Extended Wittholding Tax for its Colombian company code which is not yet live.
All existing company codes on the same client are using Classic Withholding Tax, where withholding is needed.  This is working well in many countries around the world, but will not satisfy the Colombia legal requirements.
Since Extended Withholding Tax is activated by company code, do we need to perform the Withholding Tax Changeover / Data Conversion steps for all existing entities live on SAP with Classic Wittholding?
Keep in mind that we do not plan to activate Extended Withholding Taxes in any other company code that already has productive data unless we absolutely must.
However, previous questions asked of this nature (and the SAP documentation) had ambiguous replies about whether other Existing company codes are impacted (and must be converted) as a result of activating EWT for a brand new company code with no existing master data or transactional data to be converted.
Thanks for your help.
Guy

Hi Guy,
I believe that you can use extended Withholding tax for new company code without impacting the existing company code with classic WHT configured as my belief is extended WHT is activated at company code level.
Probably you can try to configure colombia in your development system and do some testing for Colombia and negative testing for few company codes with classic WHT.
Thanks and Regards,
Gaurav

Similar Messages

  • Wrongly Activated Extended Withholding tax before data conversion

    Hi all,
    In 1099 Reporting for US, I have activated Extended Withholding Tax before conversion of data from Classical to Extended Withholding Tax. I have done this in Development system with transport request.
    If anybody has come across similar situation, pl help me with your valuable inputs.
    1. Will I be able to deactivate the extended withholding tax and do the data conversion and activate again.
    2. If not, what will be the consequences of not doing the data conversion of existing data.
    Kindly help me to come out of this crisis.
    Thanks in advance.
    San.

    Hi,
    Yes it will be possible.
    I haven't really faced this situation in EWT, but in another similar migration.
    I do not know the extent of customisation you did for EWT or whether the documents you posted after activating did get posted in the EWT area.
    The only place I think you may face will be in the migration itself, where these documents may give you errors is in the actual data migration step.  But there would be some solution for that.
    You need to see what options you have.  Can you let this situation continue?  Was this migration not a prep for doing the migration in production or just a test?  If not then you will need to do something.  This should have no impact on any migration you plan for the other systems (Quality/Production) in the landscape.
    You can log in an OSS message just in case.
    Cheers...

  • Issue with Cross-Company code transactions and Extended Withholding tax

    Hi Gurus,
    I am having an issue with Cross-company code transaction while posting expense with 2 different company codes.
    In the 2 company codes, one company code is setup for Withholding tax and other was not set.
    While posting in FB50, I am getting the below message and system does not allow to post the invoice.
    Company codes have different settings for withholding tax treatment
    Message no. F5786
    Diagnosis
    You are entering a document containing at least one vendor or customer item and which has line items in several company codes. The extended withholding tax treatment has been set to active in one of these company codes, but not in one of the other company codes.
    System Response
    You cannot enter this kind of document.
    Procedure
    Enter the transaction in two documents.
    For this I tried to test the transaction by activating of extended Withholding tax for both the company codes. Then the invoice is posting correctly now.
    The point is if I activate extended withholding tax for the Company code which is not using the setup, will it face any issues in other areas? and also kindly advice whether is this a right way to set up to fix the current problem.
    Thanks for the Support and early response will be appreciated.
    JBC.

    Hi Mamta,
    Thanks for the Response. I think you misunderstood my scenario.
    For Eg in FB60 with Co code 5065:
    I am debiting the Expenses for Co Code 1000(Witholding tax not active) and crediting the Bank Account of Co Code 5065(Withholding tax setup is done for this co code). When I tried to post with these line items I have getting the error.
    Posting        GL                   Co Code
    Dr          106520(Exp)            1000
    Cr          202020(Bank)           5065
    For this I tried by activating the Withholding tax for Co code 1000 which is not active before and post it. The system allows me to post the invoice.
    I want to know whether is this a right way to solve this issue and will it impact on any other areas by only activating the Withholding tax for a Co code?
    Thanks,
    Bapu

  • Extended Withholding tax in VIM

    Hi ,
    We are EHP 6 and we are implementing Open Tax for our new company code Philippines . 
    We have activated EXTENDED WITHHOLDING TAX " functionality in SAP and want to use same in Open text .
    We are using VIM 6 .
    Can you please help us on this?
    how to activate extended Withholding tax in VIM 6 for EHP6 .
    many Thanks
    Regards

    Dear Preeti,
    I had similar issue in VIM7 but then discovered that the fields in VIM are displayed as soon as the vendor is subjected to withholding tax. Withholding tax will show up in Tax tab.
    Let me know if it works.
    Best regards,
    Alessandro

  • Payment order are not defined for extended withholding  tax

    Hi Gurus,
    Would you please help me with the message below. It appears on F110 when I try to pay a vendor open item with extended withholding tax:
    Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
    In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
    Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
    I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
    any help is welcome

    The payment method "Y" the option "payment order only" was marked?
    For a withholding tax type with accumulation in a company code with extended withholding tax payment
    methods that create only payment orders can´t be used. Payment orders can only be created only if there are
    no tax types with accumulation involved in the paid items of the payment run.
    The functionality extended withholding tax works fine for Brazil
    however, you can´t use the payment order with this functionality.
    Please, review your customizing for payment method 'Y" in transaction
    FBZP.
    Best regards,
    Leonardo Vedovelli
    FI Support Engineer
    SAP Active Global Support

  • Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax

    Hi Gurus,
    Would you please help me with the message below:
    Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
    In my company  payment orders are created in F110  for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
    Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
    I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
    any help is welcome !
    TREAD LOCKED SINCE IT IS DUPLICATED FROM THREAD payment order are not defined for extended withholding  tax

    Hi,
    On the analysis,  the system expects an entry in the T059Q table with
    code as XX.
    The reason being in the extended withholding tax we use multiple
    witholding tax codes and these entries are stored in the table
    with_item. And in BSEG we populate the field withholding tax code i.e.
    BSEG-QSSKZ  with the value 'XX'. In classical withholding tax we used to
    store the code directly which is not possible with Extended withholding
    tax.
    As the field BSEG-QSSKZ refers to the values in the table T059Q-QSSKZ
    the entry 'XX" needed in this table for the corresponding country of the
    company code to maintain the correct relationship and consistent
    database information.
    Hence for the statistical purpose and for the internal calculations we
    need an entry in the table T059Q. Could you please maintain this code
    i.e. 'XX' also in the table T059Q in a test system? Then retest your issue.
    This should resolve your issue.
    Kind Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Extended withholding Tax in ECC6

    Hi All
    We have activated extended withholding tax in IDES ECC6.Have completed all the stuff from IMG, while assigning Tax code to Vendot Master, we are not finding the 'WHTType' and 'Liable'  field
    ready to input. These two fields are disable. Further when we assigned Tax code 'C1' from the dropdown in Tax code field , which is ready to input , it is showing the below error that *'IN C1 are not specified in Table T059Z, though it is there in the said table.
    It will be highly appreciable if any one can say the reason or if Notes needs to be applied to activate these fields.
    Error Message'
    Entry IN  C1 does not exist in T059Z (check entry)
    Message no. 00058
    Diagnosis
    Input values must be defined in Table T059Z. The value or values 'IN  C1' are not specified in this table.
    Procedure
    Check whether the input is correct and correct if necessary.
    Procedure for System Administration
    If this is not an incorrect entry, check the system settings and change them if necessary.
    If there is a connection to the Customizing system, you can maintain the system settings by choosing Customizing in the Performance Assistant or Maintain Entries (F5) when displaying the help in a modal dialog box.
    Regards
    Mukta

    Hi ANJIREDDYA
    Thanks for response.We maintained this link under Extended Withholding tax-- Calculation-withholding tax code, where we need to define tax type and tax code against country IN. This is coming under table T059Z as well , when we see through SE16.
    But still we are not able to assign tax code in Vendor master due to the below error.
    Regards
    Mukta

  • Extended Withholding Tax Configuration for USA

    Hi Friends,
    Any one of you upgraded from Classic to Extended Withholding Tax for USA?
    Could you give me a head start or if possible send me configuration docs. We are currently in ECC 6.0.
    Also how do you configure withholding tax for Foreign Vendors (like Canada or UK)?
    Appreciate it!
    Ravi.

    Hello Ajay/Surendra,
    Could you please forward me the Configuration steps to configure extended withholding tax for country code: USA/ Canada to my email: [email protected]
    Thank You
    Joana

  • Extended Withholding Tax in Country DE, Company Code 1000 in ECC 5 IDES

    hi all
    can we configure extended withholding tax for the company code 1000 in ECC5 IDES. even after making the whole configuration, while maintaining vendor master code an error message is coming.
    message: Entry DE  15 does not exist in T059Z - check your entry
    Message no. 00058
    15 is Tax Code
    i am getting some values in the customisation help hit like "Financial Accounting Basic Settings (New)" but it is not available in the IMG MENU. is it not availbale in IDES.
    it is very urgent and i am stuck up. pls provide some inputs
    regards,
    ashok

    Please, check in the IMG that you have correctly defined the table
    T059Z:
    Financial Accounting -> Financial Accounting Global Settings ->
        Withholding Tax -> Extended Withholding Tax -> Calculation ->
        Withholding Tax Codes -> Define withholding tax codes
    Please, also check the customizing of the vendor's Account Group
    and set the field Tax category as optional:
    Trans. OBD3 -> Select account group -> Company Code Data ->
        W/holding tax data, w/h tax 2 -> Withholding tax category
    Regards
    Siva

  • Error in added withholding tax code in XK02-extended withholding tax

    dear all,
    I've just activate extended withholding tax using invoice posting.
    When I want to add withholding tax code in vendor master data XK02 it appear error that tax code I've input does not exist in table T059Z, because it read country value "ID" beside the tax code.
    For example I've create tax code L1 in country ID, and add L1 in XK02, the error appear 'Entry 'ID L1' does not exist in T059Z.'
    Does anyone ever experience the same error?

    Hi Oscar,
    i would like to know whether the company and the vendor are both in country ID.
    if that is the case, just check in "Check Withholding Tax Countries" whether the country has been included.
    and also assign the WHT type to your co code in"Assign Withholding Tax Types to Company Codes".
    define the WHT type first and then WHT code.
    this should solve your problem. if not, kindly revert.
    *award points if this helps*
    Regards,
    CA. Karthik Narayan N S
    SAP-FICO Consultant

  • Extend a customer to a new company code (IDoc DEBMAS06)

    Hi,
    I'm experienceing problems when I try to add company code data (segment E1KNB1M) and sales data (segment E1KNVVM) to an incoming IDoc of basic type DEBMAS06. The customer is to be extended into two company codes and correlating sales areas.
    I have implemented notes 802008 and 895885 and now I get the error message "No batch input data for screen SAPMF02D 0310" when I check in WE02.
    I have narrowed down the problem to billing details on sales data. The problem is that the field account assignment group (KNVV-KTGRD) is emptied on the last run of sales data processing. The value is there earlier but then vanishes mysteriously. Has anyone a tip on how to get around this problem?
    I would most apprechiate any help in this matter.
    Best regards,
    Fredrik Skild

    Hi Muthuraman Govi  and Sanjeev,
    in fact I can see in backend in transaction KS03 (show cost center) there in the F4s, which comp.code + controll area combinations are valid and have indeed cost centers assigned.
    So I have a new valid comp.code and a new valid cont.area.
    The new comp.code belongs to the new contr. area.
    In SRM I set the BUK attribute as described by Sanjeev (I had that already done). Still, if it is like you say, why do I get an error in EBP when trying to buy products from the new plant in the new company code...
    Is there any more config.work necessary in backend or SRM?
    kind regards, matthias

  • Extend vendors to a new company code

    Hi,
    We are creating a new company code and I want  to know whether there is any standard transcation code to  mass create the vendors master from  the existing company code to the new company code without any BDC or LSMW.
    Thanks,
    SS

    Hi,
    Go to transaction XK99. Here you can extend vendors from one company code to another with below steps:-
    1. In XK99 slect the LFB1 - Company code dat ,and press F8.( Do not select the fields like MM17).
    2. Their will be 2 tab. select the check for DO not change for existing data.
    3. In other tab (data to be created)...give the list of vendors or Balck and the TO comp code.
    4. Bottem of this tab you have to mention the FROM company code.
    5. Press F8 and save.
    With the same method you can extend vendors from one Pur org. to another pur org. by selecting LFM1 instead of LFB1.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • How to Materials has to be extended to new company code from ecc to crm

    Hi ,
    Please guide me how to Materials has to be extended to new company code from ecc to crm , step by step.
    How to assign the  pricing procedure from ecc to crm , step by step.
    How to maintain the pricing conditions in crm , step by step.
    Your answers will be appreciated in advance.
    Thanks
    Mohmus

    Please use select all button in the top of the screen and click on copy button, here you have to change the company code.
    That's it.
    Rgds
    Murali. N

  • Extended Withholding tax changeover

    Hi, I  want to activate extended withholding tax for a company that has not used classic withholding tax. The changeover process only deals with moving from classic to extended. How do i move from nothing to extended ??
    transaction WTMG - Company code selection - the system delets company codes for which classic withholding tax has not been used......... so how do I convert the existing data

    Hi Dipak,
    All invoices posted prior to activating EWT do not get paid - details when displaying the line item within F110 say at the bottom in the Note section "Item cannot be paid due to inconsistent withholding tax information". I tried entering an exemption number on the master record with a date range up to the date of activation, but that makes no difference to the error in F110. If I go into the open items and update them for withholding tax, the items then get paid via F110.
    This leads me to believe that all old open items need to be converted.
    Regards,
    James

  • Extended Withholding Tax & MIRO - total balance

    I have the following situation:
    Extended withholding tax is active in company code and the withholding tax type is defined for invoice posting. Everything seems to work correctly except for the following detail: if the invoice has additional charges which are only subject to normal tax rate (VAT) or no tax; then during incoming invoice with MIRO the system cannot balance the accounts; always the difference is the w/t amount even though I have typed the base amount in the corresponding tab. For example, if I receive an invoice for services (no GR) with the following items (the W/T rate is 4% and VAT 16%):
    Amount subject to W/T and VAT:  4,600
    Other charges (no tax): 194
    VAT amount: 736
    W/T amount (calculated): 184
    Net invoice amount: 5,346
    If I type 5346 in the amount field and 4600 in the base amount for w/t then the balance is not correct (difference of 184), unless I type 5530 in the amount field (the others values are calculated correctly).
    Am I doing something wrong or missing configuration?
    Thanks in advance
    JAL

    Hi,
    The amount payable to vendor is 5346 (ie Gross bill of 5530 (less) withholding tax 184). In the header data, let the amount be maintained as 5530. In the withholding tax tab, change the withholding tax base amount to 4600 and the withholding tax amount as 184. This withholding tax amount gets reduced from the vendor bill of 5530.
    On simulation, you can see the screen as per your requirement.
    Regards
    Hari

Maybe you are looking for

  • Getting dump in transaction S_ALR_87012936.

    Hi Experts ,    I am running the transaction S_ALR_87012936. I have one user name which having the authorization to only one company code. when i am trying to run this transaction with that company code it is working fine.   But when i am trying to r

  • IPod Classic music artwork Displayed on TV????

    Is there a way to display my iPod Classic music artwork to my TV like my Zune does?

  • Sales Order (Urgent)!

    Hi Gurus, I have come across with this requirement, which is as follows: You can create and save a sale order with out having any of the line items in that order. My requirement is that i should not be able to save the Sales Order if there is not lin

  • 12 powerbook or 14 ibook for Final cut?

    which is a better for final cut express HD a 12 powerbook or a 14 ibook? which one should I buy (refurbished of course)

  • Does PI supports WSDL document literal wrapped?

    Hi experts, One question, please! Does PI supports WSDL document literal wrapped? If not which workaround we have? Thanks in advance, Jorge.