Actual budget comparison on F0902 in JDE : 2 ledger types

Hi experts,
I have the following problem.
I made a simple query in BI Publisher via the query builder.
In rtf (in word) I want to create a actual-budget report where you make an analysis between 2 ledgers (AA = Actuals and BA = Budgets)
Problem is that you have for 1 account (eg 33577524 see hereunder) 2 rows in the xml. So 1 for AA and 1 for BA.
I want to place these 2 amounts next to eachother in my word document
AA BA
Account 1 1000 € 800 €
But I cant manage to get them on 1 line of course.
I wanted to create a subtotal per account (to avoid this problem), but then my BA amount disappears for some reason …
Any Ideas ?
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ROWSET>
- <ROW>
<AID_AccountID>33577524</AID_AccountID>
<CTRY_Century>20</CTRY_Century>
<FY_FiscalYear>10</FY_FiscalYear>
<LT_LedgerType>AA</LT_LedgerType>
<LT_LedgerType_Description>General Ledger</LT_LedgerType_Description>
<SBL_Subledger />
<CO_Company>00421</CO_Company>
<APYC_BalFWD>2537.91</APYC_BalFWD>
<AN01_NetPosting01>275.17</AN01_NetPosting01>
<AN02_NetPosting02>214.37</AN02_NetPosting02>
<AN03_NetPosting03>218.06</AN03_NetPosting03>
<AN04_NetPosting04>0.0</AN04_NetPosting04>
<AN05_NetPosting05>0.0</AN05_NetPosting05>
<AN06_NetPosting06>0.0</AN06_NetPosting06>
<AN07_NetPosting07>0.0</AN07_NetPosting07>
<AN08_NetPosting08>0.0</AN08_NetPosting08>
<AN09_NetPosting09>0.0</AN09_NetPosting09>
<AN10_NetPosting10>0.0</AN10_NetPosting10>
<AN11_NetPosting11>0.0</AN11_NetPosting11>
<AN12_NetPosting12>0.0</AN12_NetPosting12>
<AN13_NetPosting13>0.0</AN13_NetPosting13>
<AN14_NetPosting14>0.0</AN14_NetPosting14>
<AWTD_WeektoDateNetPostings>707.60</AWTD_WeektoDateNetPostings>
<BORG_OriginalBeginningBudget>0.0</BORG_OriginalBeginningBudget>
<BREQ_RequestedBudget>0.0</BREQ_RequestedBudget>
<BAPR_ApprovedBudget>0.0</BAPR_ApprovedBudget>
<MCU_BusinessUnit>42101000</MCU_BusinessUnit>
<OBJ_ObjectAccount>725201</OBJ_ObjectAccount>
<SUB_Subsidiary>400</SUB_Subsidiary>
<SBLT_SubledgerType />
<SBLT_SubledgerType_Description />
<DL01_Description>Fuel - Tax deduct 75%</DL01_Description>
<AID_AccountID>33577524</AID_AccountID>
<R001_BillItemCode />
<R001_BillItemCode_Description>Non Intercompany Accounts</R001_BillItemCode_Description>
<R002_CategoryCode002>ICO</R002_CategoryCode002>
<R002_CategoryCode002_Description>Oper./Sell./Adm./Gen. Expenses</R002_CategoryCode002_Description>
<R003_Location>400</R003_Location>
<R003_Location_Description>Selling Expenses</R003_Location_Description>
<R004_Floor />
<R004_Floor_Description>.</R004_Floor_Description>
<R005_CategoryCode005 />
<R005_CategoryCode005_Description>.</R005_CategoryCode005_Description>
<R006_CategoryCode006>D16</R006_CategoryCode006>
<R006_CategoryCode006_Description>Cars</R006_CategoryCode006_Description>
<R021_CategoryCode021>BE613300</R021_CategoryCode021>
<R021_CategoryCode021_Description>CARBURANT VEHICULES</R021_CategoryCode021_Description>
<R022_CategoryCode022 />
<R022_CategoryCode022_Description>.</R022_CategoryCode022_Description>
<R023_CategoryCode023 />
<R023_CategoryCode023_Description>.</R023_CategoryCode023_Description>
</ROW>
- <ROW>
<AID_AccountID>33577532</AID_AccountID>
<CTRY_Century>20</CTRY_Century>
<FY_FiscalYear>10</FY_FiscalYear>
<LT_LedgerType>AA</LT_LedgerType>
<LT_LedgerType_Description>General Ledger</LT_LedgerType_Description>
<SBL_Subledger />
<CO_Company>00421</CO_Company>
<APYC_BalFWD>1935.35</APYC_BalFWD>
<AN01_NetPosting01>171.51</AN01_NetPosting01>
<AN02_NetPosting02>255.56</AN02_NetPosting02>
<AN03_NetPosting03>275.75</AN03_NetPosting03>
<AN04_NetPosting04>0.0</AN04_NetPosting04>
<AN05_NetPosting05>0.0</AN05_NetPosting05>
<AN06_NetPosting06>0.0</AN06_NetPosting06>
<AN07_NetPosting07>0.0</AN07_NetPosting07>
<AN08_NetPosting08>0.0</AN08_NetPosting08>
<AN09_NetPosting09>0.0</AN09_NetPosting09>
<AN10_NetPosting10>0.0</AN10_NetPosting10>
<AN11_NetPosting11>0.0</AN11_NetPosting11>
<AN12_NetPosting12>0.0</AN12_NetPosting12>
<AN13_NetPosting13>0.0</AN13_NetPosting13>
<AN14_NetPosting14>0.0</AN14_NetPosting14>
<AWTD_WeektoDateNetPostings>702.82</AWTD_WeektoDateNetPostings>
<BORG_OriginalBeginningBudget>0.0</BORG_OriginalBeginningBudget>
<BREQ_RequestedBudget>0.0</BREQ_RequestedBudget>
<BAPR_ApprovedBudget>0.0</BAPR_ApprovedBudget>
<MCU_BusinessUnit>42101000</MCU_BusinessUnit>
<OBJ_ObjectAccount>725201</OBJ_ObjectAccount>
<SUB_Subsidiary>500</SUB_Subsidiary>
<SBLT_SubledgerType />
<SBLT_SubledgerType_Description />
<DL01_Description>Fuel - Tax deduct 75%</DL01_Description>
<AID_AccountID>33577532</AID_AccountID>
<R001_BillItemCode />
<R001_BillItemCode_Description>Non Intercompany Accounts</R001_BillItemCode_Description>
<R002_CategoryCode002>ICO</R002_CategoryCode002>
<R002_CategoryCode002_Description>Oper./Sell./Adm./Gen. Expenses</R002_CategoryCode002_Description>
<R003_Location>500</R003_Location>
<R003_Location_Description>General Expenses</R003_Location_Description>
<R004_Floor />
<R004_Floor_Description>.</R004_Floor_Description>
<R005_CategoryCode005 />
<R005_CategoryCode005_Description>.</R005_CategoryCode005_Description>
<R006_CategoryCode006>D16</R006_CategoryCode006>
<R006_CategoryCode006_Description>Cars</R006_CategoryCode006_Description>
<R021_CategoryCode021>BE613300</R021_CategoryCode021>
<R021_CategoryCode021_Description>CARBURANT VEHICULES</R021_CategoryCode021_Description>
<R022_CategoryCode022 />
<R022_CategoryCode022_Description>.</R022_CategoryCode022_Description>
<R023_CategoryCode023 />
<R023_CategoryCode023_Description>.</R023_CategoryCode023_Description>
</ROW>
- <ROW>
<AID_AccountID>33577559</AID_AccountID>
<CTRY_Century>20</CTRY_Century>
and so on ...

I would suggest you to look up CJI3 report. Enter the report by specifying date(start and end date of the period/yr). You can see what are the actual cost posted to the project withing that time period and how much has been settled to AuC. You will get a clear picture.

Similar Messages

Multi-year monthly CO report for Actual/Budget/Variance

I have a requirement of creating a 5-year cost centre report for the following:
Actual by month (5 years x 12)
Budget by month (5 years x 12)
% of the monthly amounts compared to the total (5 years x 12)
Variance (5 years x 12)
The request is at the cost element level, by month and for 5 years. I am trying to decide which reporting tool is appropriate for this request. If I use the conventional CO report format (report painter) of one column per month for actual/budget/actual %/variance, there will be a lots of columns for 5 years!
I am familiar with reporting tools of report painter, drill-down and SAP query, although I am not sure if drill-down can be used for CCA. Would appreciate any suggestion for:
1) Reporting tools for multi-year output; and
2) Report format u2013 example of existing SAP-delivered report

Do you intend to use a report with 240 columns? I am wondering what would be the purpose of such a large column report.
Still if needed, you could try with painter itself, may be using page break perhaps. I am not sure of the limitation to the number of column.

Creation of Budget using Last Years Actual budget

Hi,
1) Is it possible to create new budgets using copy function to copy last years' actual budget to create a new budget.
2) Also copy budget from one fund center/commitment item to another fund center/commitment item
If it is not the standard functionality then how this can be done.
Regards,
Jyoti

Hi,
You can copy budget via FMCYLOAD - Generate Budget Data activity. You can define reassignment strategy restricting it to CBV year-end process in FMYC, and thus, making available copying from one budget address to another.
Regards,
Eli

Standard SAP reports for Actual / Budget

Hi Friends ,
Is there any reports available in standard sap with relevant to Actual / Budget . I found this tcodes:
S_ALR_87013648
S_ALR_87013019
In addition to above two, any other reports available ?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
Ajay

Hi Friends,
Thanks you very much for your kind co-operation.
Non of the above reports not exactly matching for my requirement. It seems some customized report has to be make , could any one let me know what are the tables get updated when do the transaction with relevant to Actual Vs. Budget?
I mean from SAP transparent tables, where can I get the monthly , yearly data for "Actual" fig.?
In the similar manner where can i get the monthly , yearly transacton data for "Budget" fig.?
Please let me know the transparent tables ....
Best Regards

Goods Issue activity creation for Funds Management Actuals Budgeting

Hi All,
We have implemented the commitment budget (PR/PO/GRIR) process at our workplace, and now we need to budget the actual consumption too (Goods Issue)
While trying to assign a strategy, I find that in the Activity Group, there is no Goods Issue activity group, but there are groups like Purchase Orders, Purchase Requisitions, Actual Posting, Controlling Posting etc defined for group numbers like 20,30,40,60, etc.
Do we need to create one, before we start budgeting the actuals too through the Goods Issuing process ? In that case, for the derivation strategy for this Goods Issue process, what value type and CO business transaction needs to be given to map it ? The value types too are categorised like invoices, payments, funds block, funds reservation, etc and the CO business transactions are FICA, RMBA, RMWA, etc, but there is not Goods Issue Transaction type.
Regards,
Wy

Hi Eli,
Thanks for the inputs !!
I suppose you meant Goods Issue comes under Value Type "54", which is named Invoices.
I checked out for possible derivations in the AVC Activity Groups and found a CO Business Transaction RMWL - Possibly felt that there must be a derivation with this and value type 54 to get the correspoding activity 40 "Actual Posting" - I got a bit confused seeing a separate Goods Issue transaction type and thus felt that there might be a separate activity group too.
Regards,
Wy

Query to Find Account Balances (Actual & Budgeted).

Hi
can any one suggest a query to list all GL (R12) Account (Segment2) Balances (Actual and Budgeted) for a given Enitity (Segment1) and Period.
Some accounts have sub-accounts with Parent child relationship. List should include all child accounts where ever balances exist.
or Pl. point me thread if it is already answered earlier in this forum.
Thanks,
T.
Edited by: user13072694 on May 28, 2010 2:15 PM
Edited by: user13072694 on May 28, 2010 2:19 PM
Edited by: user13072694 on May 28, 2010 2:25 PM

Hello.
See if this query helps you:
SELECT cc.segment2,
nvl(sum(bal.begin_balance_dr + bal.period_net_dr - bal.begin_balance_cr - bal.period_net_cr),0) "Actual Balance",
nvl(sum(balb.begin_balance_dr + balb.period_net_dr - balb.begin_balance_cr - balb.period_net_cr),0) "Budget Balance"
FROM gl_balances bal, gl_balances balb, gl_code_combinations cc
WHERE cc.code_combination_id = bal.code_combination_id
AND balb.code_combination_id = cc.code_combination_id
AND bal.set_of_books_id = <'your SOB id'>
AND balb.set_of_books_id = <'your SOB id'>
AND bal.period_name = <'your actual period name'>
AND balb.period_name = <'your budget period_name'>
AND bal.actual_flag = 'A'
AND balb.actual_flag = 'B'
AND bal.currency_code = <'you SOB currency code'>
AND balb.currency_code = <'your SOB currency code'>
GROUP by cc.segment2
Hope this helps,
Octavio

Data from two cubes to display in same grid - Actual/planned comparison

Hi All,
I want to show planned and actual data in the same grid. For example,
qty-2011001 qty-2011002 qty-2011012
actual plan actual plan actual plan
Here quantity is shown for fiscal year periods. For each fiscal year period actual and planned quantity should be shown in adjacent columns in bex analyzer. But in my model actual and planned data are in two different cubes. So how can I show in the same grid.
I thought of creating a multiprovider or infoset and by combining them we can pull data from both of them to show in the same grid. But it resulted in errors.
I was wondering if there are any interesting workaround for this.
Thanks and Regards,
Jerry

Hi,
this is a standard requirement and very easy to model. To key figures (actual and plan) are not need.
1. Create a cube for actuals A and one for plan data P. Both contain the same key figure.
2. Create a multiprovider with both cubes and use the default mapping for key figures and characteristics
3. Create an aggregation level on top of the multiprovider with the characteristics and key figures you need
4. Create a query with two restricted key figures, e.g.
Quan actual: restrict by 0INFOPROV = A
Quan plan: restrict by 0INFOPROV = P, make this element input-ready.
Drill-down 0FISCPER on columns.
Thats all.
Regards,
Gregor

Budget check not active for commitment & actual budget

Budget check runs fine while checking budget limits for Production order and vendor invoices i.e does not allow to further create production order and vendor invoices if budget limits exceeds the released budget.
But this budget check does not work on procurement processes ( PR, PO &GR).
No warning or error message pop out and the system allows to further create PR/PO/GR beyond released budget
What config changes are required to make budget check active for procurement processes.

Hi vishal,
Check the Transcation groups in Budget tolerance limits.
PScostsbudget---define tolerance limits.
If you assign ++ All Activity groups it will activate the Budget avaliability control for all Transcation.
Check the avaliability control in OPS9 whether the activation type is 1 or 2 . If 2 run the avliability control CJBN.
Hope this will helpful,
Regards,

Actual Activity allocation and Planned and actual activity comparison issue in Product Costing

Friends,
I have tried to explain the issue i am facing currently under Product Costing......
1.Cost Component Structure
10 – Material
20 – Labour
30 – Diesel
40 – Electricity
2.KP26 – Planned under Fixed Price
Labour – 2.0 HR
Diesel – 1.0 HR
Electricity – 5.0 HR
3. When I run CK11N system collecting correct rates for all activities (Costing Lot Size- 1)
Like;
1              E              LAB10    994310                  2.00        2.00        AED        1.0          HR Labour Cost New
2              E              DIE20    994320                  5.00        5.00        AED        1.0          HR Diesel Cost New
3              E              ELE30    994330                  1.00        1.00        AED        1.0          HR Electricity Cost
4              M            1100000042                          5.00        0.00        AED        1              PC RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
5              G            994201                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Depriciation Cost
6              G            994202                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Sales & Distribution Cost
                                                                          13.00                    AED
4.When I do process order Cost analysis for the produced goods it shows me different figures as my
BOM – RM is 1100000042 1 Quantity
Routing – All activity time is 1 Hr
40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            13.00-
994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      1.33
994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      3.33
994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      0.67
                                                                                                                                          2.67- AED
Note :- As per my understanding it should be
    Labour Cost New                                            2.00
                Diesel Cost New                                              5.00
                Electricity Cost                                                1.00
5.Now after Process Order confirmation
40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            00.00
994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      4.00
994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      5.00
994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      2.00
                                                                                                                                          16.00
6.For Month end actual Activity calculation and load the activaty actual rates on product
I have configured the system in below manner
1 Work center = Mapped to 1 Production Cost center
Three Different Activities mapped to Secondary Cost Element with 43 Category
For Electrictity Activity assesment from Primary to secondary 1 more cost element created with
      Category 42 Like; 994215-Electricity Cost All
One Actual Assessment has been configured to allocate Electricity cost from Primary Cost element to
      Product/Order
7.Assessment Cycle Details
Controlling Area      1000 Controlling Area
Cycle                ZELE01                  Status    Reviewed
Start Date 01.01.2014 To 31.10.2014
Text                  Elec. Cost Allocation to PROD
IND- Interactive
Assessment CEle       994215      Electricity Cost All
Sender
Cost Center    CBAKYDXBAD
Cost Element 40204
Receiver
Cost Center    CBAKYPDDXB
Tracing Factor
Var.portion type – Actual Activity
Selaction Criteria
Activity Type - ELE30
Receivers Tracing Factor
Cost Ctr Factor per        100
CBAKYPDDXB 100
8.I have received the actuall electricity bill for 1100 AED and the same has accocated through KSU5
After Cycle run when I follow below procedure
KSS2 Actual cost splitting
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB01                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE02                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE03                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE20                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE30                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB10                    183.35
                                                                                                                1100.00
Issue – System Split Electricity cost between all the activities assigned to Workcentres Cost Centre.
But I want to post that cost only to ELE30 Activity and not for all
When I RUN KSSI for actual Price determination system shows
OTy        Object                                  Name                  AUn                Act Qty      Total price    Price (Fixed)              PUnit
ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20        Production Dxb      HR                  5.0          366.66                  366.66                    10
ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.65                  916.65                    10
ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.75                916.75                    10
                                                                                                                                                      2200.06
2200.06 is almost double than 1100.00 which is actual electricity cost and the same is actually determined for all the activities.
After revaluation of the process order system posting below values
40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042                            5.00        5.00
40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071                            13.00-    13.00-
994310                  Labour Cost New                                            CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10                      1.33        183.35
994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20                      3.33        183.33
994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30                      0.67        183.33
                                                                                                                                                          2.67-      542.01
Production Variance is posted as 542.01….
I strongly believe there is some issue in configuration for activity allocation….
Main issue is
Point No. 4 – Different Figures in Process Order Cost Analysis
Point No. 7 – Assessment cycle run
Point No. 8 – KSS2 and KSII for Actual cost Allocation and Production variance…
Friends… I have tried to explain maximum please help me to understand the concept or missing configuration/Process.
Thanks
Sagar Chinchkar

Dear Rajneesh,
I have made the changes as suggested....
It seems now my Order Cost analysis and Product cost analysis are showing the same figures.
I have also maintained cost center splitting structure for ELE30 Activity allocation.
Structure Z1
Splitting structure for AT
Assignment 10
Electricity Cost
100
Allocation for ELE
Cost Element
994215
Activity Type
ELE30
Splitting Rule
100
Allocation for ELE
12
Activity quantity
Version 0
In my case actual activity confirmed is 3.1 for 2 orders in period 5
Order 1 - QTY 2
Order 2 - QTY 1.1
Total actual Electricity exp is 1150 in period 5
followed procedure to post actual activity on product is mentioned below
KSS2 Actual cost splitting - Result as expected 1150 for ELE30
KSII Actual price determination - Result as expected 3.1 actual confirmed QTY for ELE30 with actual price
       QTY 3.1         Tot Price 3,709.68        Planned(FIX) 3,709.68     Per Units 10
       (System is doing 1150/3.1*10=3709.68)
    3.CON2 Actual revaluation of orders
      Here while reevaluating the Process Orders system calculation is different
Order 1 - QTY 2 -   558.00
Order 2 - QTY 1.1 - 407.56
Total -                    965.57
     4. After CON2 system is changing the value of other activities like
     LAB10 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
     DIE20 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
Which should not be the case....
                                                                                                              PL     Act     Var
40002
RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
1005/1100000042
10.00
15.00
50.00
40015
COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
1005/4400000074
26.00-
26.00-
994201
Depriciation Cost
WMBDDEP01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994202
Sales & Distribution Cost
WMBDS&A01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994310
Labour Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10
4.00
0.00
100.00-
994320
Diesel Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20
10.00
0.00
100.00-
994330
Electricity Cost
CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30
2.00
408.06
20,303.00
If we want to just post Electricity cost based on actual Electricity expenses and Labor and Diesel are based on planned activity rates.
What setting is required in current system.....
Million thanks in advance....
Regards
Sagar Chinchkar

NQSError:22024-A comparison is being carried out between noncompatible type

Hi ppl,
I am learning OBIEE using the tutorials and I am stuck at this step in
Direct Database request wherein I am trying to create a foreign key -- TIMES.TIME_ID = AGG_ST_CAT_DAY_SALES_F.TIME_ID
This is the error that I get:
**nQSError:22024 - A comparison is being carried out between non-compatible type**
I have tried debugging using google and searched here in the forums as well, but no one seems to have come across this error before.
I am stuck at this point while trying to create physical joins for aggregate tables.
OBIEE version is 10.1.3.3.3
and DB is Oracle 11g.
ANyhelp is appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Abhilash

Hey,
Thanks for a quick reply.
I checked the datatypes for both the columns and they are as follows:
AGG_ST_CAL_DAY_SALES_F.TIME_ID is of Date datatype
TIMES.TIME_ID is also of Date datatype, TIME_ID is a primary key for this table.
I ran the query directly on the DB and it runs fine without errors, Is there any way to check the query that is being sent to the DB via OBIEE
THanks,
Abhilash

COMPARISON BETWEEN N70M AND ANY OTHER SAME TYPE NO...

I'VE GOT A NEW N70M THREE DAYS AGO. I JST NEED TO KNOW WHETHER THERE WAS ANY OTHER EQUIVALENT PHONE AT THE SAME PRICE WITH BETTER SOUND AND GOOD FEATURES.

28-Aug-200708:10 PM
tehrules wrote:
Please DO NOT USE ALL CAPS. Un-necessary.
I don't understand your question. You've got a top quality phone there. I have the Normal N73.
He doesn't have the n73 me but the n70 me. This is an older generation phone but if bought cheap it works fine.
N70 & E90

How to get actuals at budget exchange rate

Hi All,
I am working on a multi currency planning application.
I want to do variance reproting wherein I have to calculate variance between actual * actual exchage rate and actual * budget exchange rate.
What can be the best way to do this?

To get actuals at budget exchange rate the normal practice is to have another scenario called something like actual_bud_rate where you have the budget exchange rates loaded.
The variance can then be accomplished in many ways whether that be via SmartView, Financial Reports, or creating another scenario and using one of the variance functions @VAR, @VARPER.
The key to any of the methods for variance is that new scenario and loading the budget rates to that scenario.
Regards,
John A. Booth
http://www.metavero.com

Abap report for budget/actual/commitment

Hi Guru..
Please help me.
Im in urgent
I wanna write an abap program for budget/actual/commitment.
I try to trace prgram s_alr_87013019, but only one table found.
Please let me know which table is using for budget/actual/commitment
report..
Please guru..

Hello Mohd,
The actual,budget and commitment values are stored in the one table COSP.
The values differentiate with field VRGNG - "CO Business Transaction".
If the record has in this field text 'COIN' it means that values are "actual".
For example:
OBJNR PR00000101
GJAHR 2005
KSTAR 101101
VRGNG COIN
TWEAR USD
WTG001 100,00
WTG002 200,00
It means that the element PR0000101 has the 'actual' operations refering
the cost element 101101, with values: 100,00 USD in january 2005 and
200,00 USD in february 2005.
The next row in the table COSP, clould look like this:
OBJNR PR00000101
GJAHR 2005
KSTAR 101101
VRGNG RMBA
TWEAR USD
WTG001 100,00
WTG002 0,00
This means that there was a 'Purchase requisition' in january 2005
with decretation on object PR0000101.
And the next row, could be:
OBJNR PR00000101
GJAHR 2005
KSTAR 101101
VRGNG RMBE
TWEAR USD
WTG001 0,00
WTG002 150,00
And that means that in february 2005 there was a 'Purchase order'
with value 150,00 USD decretated on this object.
I hope, that my explanation is now clear and accurate.
- Marta

How to View the Actual Remaining Budget for Earmarked Fund?

Hi All,
First of all, pardon if my questions below are very basic, I'm an ABAPer trying to gasp the big FI process.
Background:
I created a project definition then allocate a budget via CJ30. I created WBS Element then allocate a budget again.
I created an Earmarked Fund via TCODE FMZ1 using WBS Element as my main budget allocation. I then created a vendor invoice using that WBS Element. I then post a payment against the invoice created.
Via PS Report s_alr_87013557, I can see that my actual budget was deducted by the funds disbursed from my payment document.
Does it have an impact on my earmarked fund?
If I use the Earmarked Fund in my posting, is there a similar report to PS where I can see the actual budget deduction?
Thanks.

I am dealing with a similiar situation right now. In the standard PS reports, I cannot find where the value type (2A) for funds reservations (earmarked funds) is included in the report characteristics.
We made a copy of one of the standard PS reports S_ALR_87013534 (form 12KST1G) by going into CJE6 and then added value type 2A. After changing the custom report, your payment using the earmarked fund will be in the actual column and the remaining unused amount for the earmarked funds should be in the commitment column.
In the earmarked fund document when you display it there is a button for consumption that shows the activity for that document.

Actual at budget rate

Does the SPRUNCONVERSION rule calculate the scenario Categories (Actual at Budget rate, Actual at Prior Yr rate ...). I have all the required properties in place but cannot get the FX conversion to run on these categories.
Aimee

Hi Aimee,
This should work.
Most important is some requirements and settings in the category dimension. Below some properties in the category dimension that are needed:
FX_SOURCE_CATEGORY: is the category where the data comes from
RATE_CATEGORY: is the category where the rates are retrieved from
RATE_YEAR: is the relative year where the rates come from (ie -1/1)
RATA_PERIOD: is the period where the rates are retrieved from (ie dec)
For example if you want actual @ budget rates then you have to create a new category called ACTBUD en apply the following property values:
FX_SOURCE_CATEGORY: actual
RATE_CATEGORY: budget
RATE_YEAR: blank
RATA_PERIODL blank
Hope this helps,
Alwin

Actual budget comparison on F0902 in JDE : 2 ledger types

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for