Adding new rule in transformation

I have loaded data into my Infocube using 7.x dataflow.
In my transformation I did not map time characterirstic 0FISCPER initially.
Now I update my transformation.To fill up the values into this field 0FISCPER do I have to delete all the old records and load data again into my infocube or is there anyway to update values of this field for the already loaded records?
Please suggest..
Thanks,

hI,
If u r having the data in the PSA then change the Transformations....Map the date field....Delete the data from the cube....load the data
If u don't want to delete the content...go for Remodeling concept.....
/people/mallikarjuna.reddy7/blog/2007/02/06/remodeling-in-nw-bi-2004s
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/58/85e5414f070640e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Thanks/Tarak
Edited by: Tarak on Jan 7, 2009 1:50 PM

Similar Messages

Adding new fields to the data flow

Hi,
I am currently planning to add some new fields in one DSO and map it (with info source) in the update rules.
Will adding new fields to Info source - Comm. structure affect all the update rules connected to it?
The info source is connected to multiple DSO.
(The data source is currently under enhancement for these fields). Once this is done, we have to replicate it to BW.
Thanks,
Naveen

yes.
Once the enhancement is done for data source in r/3 side, you will have to replicate the datasource in BW.
Adding new fields will deactivate the update rules. You have to map the same in update rule and activate the same.
This will require activation of transformations, update rules, etc for related DSOs. Try to find out the where used list for the DSO where you want to add the new objects. Then check each objects whether these are activate after the changes. If these are inactive, you will have to activate all the objects.
Cheers
Chanda

Why not allow Business Rule Design Transformer to overwrite existing BRDDs

Hi,
It can be quite annoying during development to continually having to remove the BRDD Trigger and PL/SQL Definition when running the BR Design Transformer reveals missing information in the BR Analysis definition. It seems that it would be practical to have at least the option to have the Business Rule Design Transformer overwrite an existing Business Rule Design Definition.
You could think of an additional parameter in this utilily labeled "Overwrite existing BRDD?" with allowable values Y(es) and N(o) with No as default (so that the default functionality is the same as before).
Below you find the code that can be added to the HSU_BRTR package to realize such a functional improvement. Maybe you can consider it for a next release...?!
best regards,
Lucas Jellema
AMIS Services BV
code to add to HSU_BRTR to provide a parameter that allows the user to specify whether or not the HSU_BRTR is allowed to overwrite an existing BRDD:
in the revision history:
09-jan-2003 Lucas Jellema
6.5.2.3AMIS1.1 Added new parameter and supporting code that allows user to indicate
whether existing Business Rule Design Definitions may be/should be overwritten
at the end of procedure install
hsu_install.add_parameter
( PACKAGE_NAME -- package name
, 40 -- sequence
, 'Overwrite existing BRDDs?' -- prompt
, 'N' -- default value actual
, 'No' -- default value displayed
, 'Y' -- mandatory
, 'N' -- allow multi-select
, 'N' -- include shared elements
, '' -- element type short name
, '' -- sql expression actual
, '' -- sql expression displayed
, null -- where clause
, null -- synchronize with
, null -- foreign key column
, -- help text
'Choose whether you want this utility to overwrite existing Business Rule Design Definitions.'
hsu_install.add_allowable_value
( PACKAGE_NAME -- package name
, 40 -- parameter
, 1 -- sequence
, 'Y' -- actual value
, 'Yes' -- displayed value
hsu_install.add_allowable_value
( PACKAGE_NAME -- package name
, 40 -- parameter
, 2 -- sequence
, 'N' -- actual value
, 'No' -- displayed value
--------6.5.2.3AMIS1.1
Just before procedure transform_stage2
procedure delete_brdds
( p_tbl_id in ci_table_definitions.id%type
, p_br_name in varchar2
-- Purpose Delete existing Business Rule Design Definition
-- Usage from run procedure
-- Remarks Find PL/SQl Module Definition based on Business Rule Label
is
cursor c_brdd
( b_tbl_id in ci_table_definitions.id%type
, b_br_name in varchar2
is
select trg.id trg_id
, trg.name name
, plm.id plm_id
from ci_database_triggers trg
, ci_plsql_modules plm
where trg.table_definition_reference = b_tbl_id
and trg.plsql_module_reference = plm.id
and plm.name = b_br_name
begin
-- loop over journalling busrules of this application
<<brdd>>
for r_brdd in c_brdd(p_tbl_id, p_br_name) loop
-- delete busrule (delete of trigger is since 6i not enough anymore, so
-- explicitly delete PL/SQL module also)
bllog.write
( 'Deleting trigger '||r_brdd.name||' and PL/SQL module '
||hsu_name.get_name_and_path(r_brdd.plm_id)
||', a new business rule design definition overwrites this old one.'
, bllog.information
bltrg.del(r_brdd.trg_id);
blplm.del(r_brdd.plm_id);
end loop brdd;
end delete_brdds;
inside procedure transform_stage2
(just before the comment: -- check if BRDD with this plm_name already exists)
if p_overwrite_br = 'Y'
     then
delete_brdds
( p_tbl_id => g_trg_tbl(i).tbl_id
, p_br_name => l_plm_name
     end if; -- find_trg and overwrite =Y
A new parameter in procedure transform_br_fun
procedure transform_br_fun
, p_overwrite_br in varchar2 default 'N' -- 6.5.2.3AMIS1.1
use the parameter p_overwrite_br in the call to transform_stage2
transform_stage2
( p_fun_id => p_fun_id
, p_fun_label => r_fun.fun_function_label
, p_fun_short_definition => r_fun.fun_short_definition
, p_msg_prefix => p_msg_prefix
, p_msg_language => p_msg_language
, p_rule_type => l_rule_type
               , p_overwrite_br => p_overwrite_br -- 6.5.2.3AMIS1.1
new parameter p_overwrite_br in the procedure run
NOTE: in both PACKAGE SPECIFICATION and BODY
, p_overwrite_br in varchar2 default'N' -- 6.5.2.3AMIS1.1
use the parameter p_overwrite_br in all calls to transform_br_fun inside procedure run
transform_br_fun
( p_fun_id => r_fun_tree.id
, p_msg_prefix => p_msg_prefix
, p_msg_language => p_msg_language
, p_create_att_usages => p_create_att_usages
, p_overwrite_br => p_overwrite_br -- 6.5.2.3AMIS1.1

Among the alternatives not mentioned... Using a TiVo DVR, rather than the X1; a Roamio Plus or Pro would solve both the concern over the quality of the DVR, as well as providing the MoCA bridge capability the poster so desperately wanted the X1 DVR to provide. (Although the TiVo's support only MoCA 1.1.) Just get a third-party MoCA adapter for the distant location. Why the hang-up on having a device provided by Comcast? This seems especially ironic given the opinions expressed regarding payments over time to Comcast. If a MoCA 2.0 bridge was the requirement, they don't exist outside providers. So couldn't the poster have simply requested a replacement XB3 from the local office and configured it down to only providing MoCA bridging -- and perhaps as a wireless access point? Comcast would bill him the monthly rate for the extra device, but such is the state of MoCA 2.0. Much of the OP sounds like frustration over devices providing capabilities the poster *thinks* they should have.

Rule+ in transformations

hi,
can any body explain me what is rule+ and what is rule- in transformations and what is the use?. i have tried adding the object and its populating to the target . but what is the use of it?
regards,
manju

Hi Manjunath,
Rule+ is used to create a new rule.
Rule- is used to delete a rule. Using Rule+ you can create new rule for a keyfigure.
Thanks,

Problems adding new caracteristics ti 0IC_C03 Cube

Hi people:
We made a copy of standar cube 0IC_C03. We add some new time characteristics (0halfyear, etc..). De activation of the cubes is OK, but when we try to map the corresponding fields in the tranformation rules, the new fields doesn't exist. Like the group of transformation are standar, we try to add them manually, but the infoobject isn't seen.
Does this cube has a limitation for adding new infoobjects? Am I misssing some step I don't know?
Thank you in advanced.

Hi,
There is a relation between time characterstics ,
We have to take care of this relation in the transformation mapping where we are mapping source fields to target fields.
Please refer below link which will show you the relation between time characterstics.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/44/be8b631c743959e10000000a1553f6/content.htm
Hope this will help you...
Thanks,
Jitendra

Adding new date field to already loaded data target.

Hi,
we have a cube containing date feild such as 0CALMONTH. the data is being loaded to the cube. now they have added new date feild (0FISCYEAR). how to get data to this feild. there is no data coming from source system for this feild. please can any one tell me how to include this feild and load data into it.
with regards,
sreekanth.

Sreekanth,
If Record creation date is the right field for deriving fiscal year, Why cant you derive the year from the date...by using automatioc time conversion...?? In update rules...??
For exising data, you can do loop back to populate the data. see the below doc, for more info:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f421c86c-0801-0010-e88c-a07ccdc69601
Hope it Helps
Srini
Message was edited by: Srini

Adding new characteristics to cube with data

Hi Gurus,
i need to add some characteristics to a cube already in production, this cube is customized version of material stocks/movements cube (0ic_c03).
i am looking for a way to add the new characteristics without having to do reinitialisation (opening stock,...), i am thinking about a loopback process but how do i manage to get the new characteristics populated for the historical data?
Thank you.

Hi,
If you want to load historial data, you must take ECC down time and re-intialization is required.Becasue you are adding new object in Cube and for that you need to change the Update rules, then need to load historical data, so without down time and reinitialization it is not possible.
Check like below.
You have data in PSA, so try to delete data from Cube and then load from PSA. Because you may write code in Update rules on;y I think. So in that case, it may work.
Thanks
Reddy

Convert ABAP code in start routine/update rule to transform. start routine

Dear BW ABAPers,
I have created a custom purchasing info cube (YCP_PURC1) based on 0CP_PURC1 standard cube. I would like to convert this new data flow to BI7 (from 3.x), and convert the standard update rule to transformation. I would need to rewrite the below start routine from the standard update rule to a start routine ABAP code in the newly created transformation / start routine. My ABAP knowledge is limited. Will you please help?
*this is the start routine from the update rule. As a side note, the data source is 2LIS_02_SCL.
LOOP AT SOURCE_PACKAGE.
    IF (     SOURCE_PACKAGE-cppvlc EQ 0
         AND SOURCE_PACKAGE-cppvoc EQ 0
         AND SOURCE_PACKAGE-cpquaou EQ 0 ).
      DELETE SOURCE_PACKAGE.
      CONTINUE.
    ENDIF.
no_scl is initial ( e.g. for good receipts, billing)
value has to be set depending on storno
    IF SOURCE_PACKAGE-no_scl IS INITIAL.
      IF SOURCE_PACKAGE-storno = 'X'.
        SOURCE_PACKAGE-no_scl = -1.
      ELSE.
        SOURCE_PACKAGE-no_scl = 1.
      ENDIF.
      MODIFY SOURCE_PACKAGE.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
ABORT = 0.
Many thanks and look forward to your kind feedback.
Kind regards,
Csaba

Dear All, Durgesh,
thanks to you all for your valuable input. Mainly the ABAP part was more interesting for me.
Durgesh, thanks for your input, it was useful. I just had to change the info objects to data source fields and add the lines before the loop:
DATA: I_PACKAGE TYPE TYT_SC_1.
    FIELD-SYMBOLS <i_package> TYPE tys_sc_1.
    I_PACKAGE[] = SOURCE_PACKAGE[].
    LOOP AT SOURCE_PACKAGE assigning <i_package>.
      IF ( <i_package>-BWGEO EQ 0
      AND <i_package>-BWGEOO EQ 0
      AND <i_package>-BWMNG EQ 0 ).
        DELETE SOURCE_PACKAGE index sy-tabix.
        CONTINUE.
      ENDIF.
no_scl is initial ( e.g. for good receipts, billing)
value has to be set depending on storno
      IF <i_package>-NOSCL IS INITIAL.
        IF <i_package>-ROCANCEL = 'X'.
          <i_package>-NOSCL = -1.
        ELSE.
          <i_package>-NOSCL = 1.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
Points have been assigned accordingly.
Thanks,
Csaba

I have updated my BRE with new rule but it is not working.

Hi All,
I have got a requirement to add one more rule into my existing BRE.
Below are the points that I followed :
1).Firstly, I created the new version for my BRE , and added my rule in that.
2). Then I un-deployed the previous version of BRE and Deployed its new version.
3). I did restarted host instances and Rule engine service also.
3). Now, when I am testing the sample consisting of previous rule then it is executing,
But on the other hand when i am testing the sample based on my new rule then BRE is not working.
If BRE is Executing with previous rule then i believe it is working,
Then why it is not working for my new Rule .
4). When i am testing my policy then it is also working well enough .
Note : The Schema path is also correct ,
Any help and suggestion will be appreciated
Kind Regards
Rishi Gaur

Hi Shankycheil,
1). My policy version 1.0 was having 10 rules.
2). Then i copied version 1.0 and added it to my new version 1.1 .
3). Than i added my rule to it only.
After all this I Undeploy version 1.0 and deployed my new version 1.1.
In Admin console I am getting error like you mentioned somewhere about policy not found?

Adding new infoobject

hai
i am adding new infoobject to ods and cube,that have data already.how can i do.i want to delete the data both in ods and cube.if so how to delete the data in ods.

hi..
Unless you delete data from Cube , Data from ODS can not be deleted and this behavior is to maintain consistency of data and subsequent delta updates from ODS to Cube.
You cant delete the data from ODS if data is already in Active table of ODS.
In this scenario you can do only delete the whole data & again upload.
ODS ---> Rightclick -
> Delete
You will have to activate ODS in order to delete data from ODS.
Ideal sequence could be
1. Delete data from ODS
2. Do enhancement in R/3 side
3. Do enhancement in BW side ( add/ remove info object )
4. Activate ODS, Update Rule.
hope it helps..

Migration of update rules to transformations

Hi Experts,
We are in process of migrating update rules to Transformations.
We have following data flow for one info cube.
*Existing*
Data source -
>transfer Rules--->info source->update rules--
>cube
New
Data source -
>transformations----
>cube
When I am trying to create transformations, I am not able to read master data properties for all info objects.
It gives error that No info object is available.
Now my question is
it is not possible to read mster data in one transformation?
If I change my new scenario to this then it workes.
Data source -
>transformations----->info source(new BI7)--
>transformations -
>cube
But then I need to convert All existing info source to new one in BI7 then only I can use read from master data functionality.
Please advice.
<removed by moderator>
Edited by: Siegfried Szameitat on Nov 25, 2008 9:05 AM

In the Transformation maintenance, open the rule details.
Here you see the source fields of the rule.
Update 'IOAssgnmnt' with the InfoObject corresponding to the field from the source system.
Example
Field PERNR
Description Personnel No.
Type NUMC
Length 8
Conversion
IOAssgnmnt 0EMPLOYEE <-- Entered manually
Then you should be able to use the 'Read master data' functionality.
Regards,
Lars

Open Enrollment Form, adding new coverage level

Hi All
We have recently added Domestic partner level as an option in our Health Insurance Plans. I believe I have correctly added the new plans etc because they are showing up on the open enrollment form. The problem is the new plan is only showing up with the old coverage options (i.e. single, ee & spouse, family etc) and is missing the new Domestic Partner and Spouse coverage option that I added. Please advise on how to get it to show up on the form.
Thanks in advance

Hi Ken,
What i understand is... you have done the following
Health Plans: IMG ->Personal Management->Benefits- >Plans->Health Plans
1. You have setup the config in Define Health Plan General Data.
2. IMG >> Personal Management->Benefits- >Plans->Health Plans->Define Dependent Coverage Options
Set up your Domestic Partner option here i.e. E+DP (Min: 1 / Max: 1)
3. Setup the Cost Variants in the node IMG->Personal Management->Benefits- >Plans->Health Plans->Define Cost Variant
4. Setup the Cost Rules in the node IMG->Personal Management->Benefits- >Plans->Health Plans->Define Cost Rule
5. Assign the health plan attriubtes in the node IMG >>Personal Management->Benefits- >Plans->Health Plans->Assign Health Plan Attributes. I guess this is what you missed.
One question here......are you using Adjustment reasons for adding new coverage???
Kumarpal Jain.

Added new field to cube but data not passed from DSO

Hope someone can help.
(BI 7.0) We added new fields into a cube. The fields already existed in the DSO. When we ran the process chain in development for the first time after making this change, we notice that the 'historical' data for these fields is populated in the cube. When we do this in our quality system only new data passed to the cube is updated. In development in the sub-chain DTP request we see all previous requests listed under selections. In quality it is only the latest request. The only difference is that the DeltaInit flag in the DTP request in development is ticked (extraction mode) - but not in quality. Does anyone know whyb this is?

hi peter,
Adding fields to cube doesn't affect delta status...The delta DTP should be able to handle delta requests automatically.
I guess in you quality system, the cube already got all requests updated from ODS before you importing the change request. And in develop system none of the requests in ODS were updated before the change.
Regards,
Frank

In ical I just added new calendars to a pre-existing calendar group, I can make events with these calendars, but not reminders, any suggestions?

in ical I just added new calendars to a pre-existing calendar group, I can make events with these calendars, but not reminders, any suggestions?

Hi,
Lion has changed the way reminders (todos as was) work. They now seem to need to be in a seperate calendar.
In iCal open the File menu and select New Reminder List... and select where to put it.
Best wishes
John M

Added new fields in vendor master in xk01 but data is not getting saved

Hi experts,
To add new fields in vendor master i have followed the following steps :
1.) Appended a structure ZRTGS in LFA1 table with required fields and activated
2.) Added new button in xk01( vendor master ) using spro -> logistics-general -> business partner -> vendors ->
control ->adoption of customer's owaster data fields -> prepare modification free-enhancement of vendor master record
Created a screen group ZR and defined label tab pages with function code ZRTGS and saved entries
3.) Created a implementation for BADIs VENDOR_ADD_DATA and VENDOR_ADD_DATA_CS.
4.) Created a program with my own subscreen for the required fields
The button is getting displayed in XK01, XK02 and XK03 respectively. Whenever the button is clicked the subscreen with
the fields is also displayed. But whenever i try to save the data in either XK01 or XK02 it is not getting saved in to the
database table LFA1.
Request your help in this regard.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi,
You may need to check this include .
EXIT_SAPMM06E_008 -->Import Data from Customer Subscreen for Purchasing Document
Thanks,
vamshi

Adding new rule in transformation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for