Additional document...with custom backend object

At the top of page 242 in the WCEM Development and Extension guide it says, "This won't be covered in this document. But there is an additional document which shows how to get data from a ABAP function module with a custom backend object."
Does this document exist? Where is it?
Thanks,
Clint

The Application-Specific Information Guide?
Yes, I saw that one, but it seemed very specific to enhancing Products, Shopping Cart, and Payments.
Section 2.1 talks about adding a new menu item, which is one part of it and then in the DEG - Generic Info it gives the custom F4 help example.
I was hoping there was a document that shows a custom example all together...Menu, custom view, calling a Z RFC to get the data.

Similar Messages

Word 2010 Document with embedded pdf objects

Is it possible to convert a word 2010 document with embedded pdf object into a PDF without loosing the functiuonality of double clicking on the Acrobat icon and opening the (embedded) document?
Thank you for your help.

Pretty sure that the PDF will contain exactly what you'd get if you printed the Word document. There is no promise or expectation that objects will be "live".

Generating a blank document with custom code

Is there a way I can generate a blank document with custom code in it? I have been looking at several methods of doing this but so far I have been unsuccessful. So any assistance here would be appreciated. This is for an extension I am currently working on.
Many thanks

This is a public forum; please do not post your email address or other private data (by sending the forum notification with all its headers back to the forum).

Role without Tcode but with customized "Z" Object only

Hi all,
Please help my querry is that with a Single Role as while seeing that role in PFCG in Menu Tab no Tcode is assigned and in the Authoriztion Tab -> change authorization tab just a single(one) Z auth object is maintained with Display actvt and i am not able to understand how this is going how the user are able to access the the Role without TCODE assigned but with just a Z authobject. please tell How this is going and working .
Your help will be greatly appreciated and pleas tell how this Z auth object are created.
Thanks,
Chandresh.

>
> You need to provide more infos (from the system) and just asking on site is a good idea (as mentioned by Alex).
>
> Cheers,
> Julius
I agree that asking onsite could give more insight into the Z-Object usage. I can explain the probable reason of having the Z-Object as a stand alone authorization
In a role inheritance scenario, when you have roles with 100+ transactions (role A, B,C, .......) which act as the master roles and the derived roles being A1,A2,A3...... depending on the number of inherited roles you have in the set-up, authorization objects like customer authorization group or vendor authorization group can be a tough task (as these are not called in the organization level values) - in this situation as the authorization groups would have to maintained individually in the inherited roles and can be a time consuming task with the additional risk of passing down the values of the master role every time it is generated and inherited - a better option could be to maintain a non-existent value in the master role , inherit it so the non-existent value is passed down to the inherited roles. To give access on the specific authorization groups , create a role with only the object F_KNA1_BED or F_BKPF_BED as might be the case and maintain organization specific values in these object and assign it to the users who need it
My guess would be that the Z-object the operator mentions is something that is developed to address such an issue

Calling Web Service Proxy with Custom java Object as parameter

I created a web service proxy from WSDL URL using JDeveloper 11g(.5 version)
I need to call a webservice method which takes custom Java Object( Ex: ABC.java) as Input parameter. It creates the XSD java (ABC.java) file for that.
@XmlElementRef(name = "abc", namespace = "http://impl.service.ns.test", type = JAXBElement.class)
protected JAXBElement<ABC> abc;
ABC.java has a property of type java.util.Set of a custom Java Object (Set<XYZ.class>)
It doesn't create xsd file for XYZ.java.
@XmlElementRef(name = "XYZ", namespace = "http://model.ns.test/xsd", type = JAXBElement.class)
protected JAXBElement<Set> xyz;
Please help me.

The passing of Java objects in and out of a web service is NOT supported. variables must be xml documents defined by a XML schema. In my opinion, missing Java object and WSDL is not a good idea. -Edwin

Problems with customer text objects in ZDEBMAS definition

Hi
   We have a Z* version ( ZDEBMAS ) of std customer chg pointer msg type DEBMAS - this ZDEBMAS is a shortened version of DEBMAS
We notice that whenever customer related texts are changed in customer master, change pointer objects with CD class - CUSTTEXT, TABLE-STXH get generated for the DEBMAS msg type. No such change pointer data gets generated for my ZDEBMAS.
I do not see any CD class with 'CUSSTEXT' entry in the definition of DEBMAS message type -bd52.
I basically want to replicate the customer text data change pointer generation functionality for my 'ZDEBMAS' msg type too ? Any pointers so to what I am missing ?
We are at a very critical stage of implementing the Z* solution - any pointers will be rewarded right away ....

Hi Abdul
         Thanks for the quick response. Yes the change pointers are activated globally ( bd61 ) and the change pointer is activated for ZDEBMAS ( bd50 ). The problem here is that - change pointer data gets generated in ZDEBMAS for other customer related fields - the problem is with customer text fields - the change pointer data does not get generated for customer text fields in ZDEBMAS - whereas it gets generated for DEBMAS - I am wondering why and how ?? ( since DEBMAS does not have an explicity CUSTTEXT - object class in its definition ) . Also, when I try to add this object class as a part of ZDEBMAS , I get an error message that this object class does not exist

Opening documents with custom layer structure, especially default layer unlocked...

Hi, is it possible to open documents such as jpg screenshots which are apparently a locked layer by default, as instead an unlocked layer?
Would it even be possible/easy to have a method of opening such documents with the following layers:
1 original image (unlocked)
2 blank transparent layer
3 white locked background
4 group folder called 'archive' with a copy of the original image, with the group set to invisible
Could a droplet be made to open documents with such a "precreated" layer set-up?
For example, I would like to take a screenshot or scan, drag it onto a droplet, and have it open with the layer structure outlined above.
Thank you thank you thank you...

"The image is NOT locked."
Shesh whatever you call it the image the background the initial layer "the so called layer" I would just like to change its default opening to UNLOCKED so at minimum, as I have said four times now, it can be placed in a folder called "Archive" without having to f'ing unlock it...scripting additional opening actions in addition to that at this point must be beyond your imagination
"Have you tried working on the so called locked layer?"
HAVE YOU READ THE ORIGINAL QUESTION????
Working on the background layer is not my primary concern, organizing layers automatically at the start of a workflow is...but nevertheless...erasing part of the background in order to reveal imported images or drawings created beneath it on new layers requires the background be unlocked (so erased sections are transparent rather than black), changing layer order requires unlocking, moving the background on a resized canvas requires unlocking....and of course placing it within a folder requires unlocking -- what the hell is the advantage of it being default locked?? why isn't this optional?
I can't imagine people working on complex images with multiple folders and forty plus layers in various folders and such -- nevertheless consistently want to leave the background layer just sitting there hanging out in its default locked state. I'm ALWAYS unlocking the damn layer...if only, for the FIFTH TIME, for organizational purposes (to change its layer order and place it within a folder).
SHESH!
"Methinks..." Oh please...next time read the question.

Enhance ZMMJ or Normal Change Document with Custom User

Hi there,
I am wondering if it is possible to add a specific field into a change document.
We have a requirement whereby 2 different testers need to be added to a change. The first tester will perform testing of Development in DEV (as per our custom workflow) and then the second tester will perform the normal testing in QA.
Now these two testers might not necessarily be the same person or have the same authorization.
So, my question is that when you are assigning team members to the change (Developer, Tester, Change Manager, IT Operator), is there an option to add another user field here, such as Dev Tester?
Thank you.

Hi Bradley,
SAP Note 1728284 has a PDF Attachment with a detailed description what needs to be done. Please follow this description to adapt your configuration.
Thanks
Vikram

Duplicated document with the smart object which has a DNG file inside it

A TIFF file has a DNG file as a smart object inside it ...
If you duplicate this file, the smart object can not be opened any more.
Any idea?
Thanks ...

I've looked at it again for TIFF after reading your post ... it is working now

Documents with Smart Objects - Very slow to open and Save - CS6 Photoshop

When opening and saving documents with smart objects photoshop freezes the adobe PS loader (circle dots) is replaced and the system loader (multi colored wheel of death) spins for 30 seconds or more.
What I've tried so far based off looking at various posts.
Photoshop Preferenes
Save in Background off
Maximise PSD and PSB file compatability never
Cache Tile Size: 128k
Advanced Graphic Processor Settings: Basic & Normal
Layer Panel options: No Thumbnail
Observations and workthroughs to date
The file size and amount of smart objects effects the file expotentially i.e. The more smart objects you have the worse it gets
These files worked perfectly in PS CS5
It also happens on files natively created in PS CS6
The CPU is maxing out at 100% while PS loads
Closing or opening suitcase has no effect.
System:
iMac 27-inch, Mid 2011
Processor 3.4 GHz Intel Core i7
Memory 16 GB 1333 MHz DDR3
Graphics AMD Radeon HD 6970M 1024 MB
Mac OS X Lion 10.7.5 (11G63)
Suitcase 4
Anyone got any ideas? This is making me go nuts!

A solution!
It turns out the problem in my case was in fact Suitcase. Previously, I'd tried turning it off, but that didn't fix the problem, so this time, I uninstalled it completely and the problem disappeared. I then began re-adding it (installed 15.0.1, upgraded it, etc.) and the problem resurfaced with the addition of the Photoshop-specific plugin. Deleting that plugin solved the problem. So it seems that "disabling" Suitcase by stopping the TypeCore doesn't seem to actually disable all of the tentacles it sticks into your system.
You can find the plugin here: Applications / Adobe Photoshop CS6 / Plug-ins / Automate / ExtensisFontManagementPSCS6.plugin
(After a restart, I also had to delete the font cache, as described here http://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/kb/troubleshoot-fonts-photoshop-cs5.html but your mileage may vary.)
Alternately, if you don't want to delete the plugin, disabling it from within Photoshop seems to work as well. To do that, go to File > Automate > Extensis, click Preferences..., then deselect Enable Suitcase Fusion 4 Auto-Activation.
Fortunately, the plugin doesn't seem necessary at all to use the the core functionality of Suitcase (enabling and disabling fonts) in Photoshop. I didn't even know what these app-specific plugins did until researching this problem, and I still don't quite understand the point of them. I guess they allow you to let the apps for which they're installed do a little bit more of their own management (enable a font via Suitcase that isn't enabled system-wide), but that seems like more control than I need--if I'm enabling a font, I want all my software to be able to use it.
Anyway, the problem seems to be completely solved on my system now, though I just did all this, so more testing over the next few days is required. I'll post here if any issues crop up. I'm interested in hearing if this solves it for anyone else as well.

Create custom document with wrong size

Hi,
I have a problem (on Sun Solaris 5.8) when I create custom document with more than 10MB size.
I've created an agent which detects the events on a custom data type
MYDOCUMENT (extension .mydoc).
When I put a new document test1.mydoc (size of 10MB for example), my agent detects the new document, creates a copy, sets the class object to
MYDOCUMENT , removes the original document and puts the copy into the same folder.
But sometimes, the copy created has a wrong size (less then 10MB).
How can I configure the nfs server to be sure that the agent waits for the complete size of the added document.
I need HELP !!!!
Thanks

Hi Pavithra,
yeah you can create your custom table by entering fields in Standard. for more details
refer below screen shots
Regards,
Thangam.P

How to upload a document with values related to document properties in to document set at same time using Javascript object model

Hi,
Problem Description: Need to upload a document with values related to document properties using custom form in to document set using JavaScript Object Model.
Kindly let me know any solutions.
Thanks
Razvi444

The following code shows how to use REST/Ajax to upload a document to a document set.
function uploadToDocumentSet(filename, content) {
appweburl = decodeURIComponent(getQueryStringParameter('SPAppWebUrl'));
hostweburl = decodeURIComponent(getQueryStringParameter('SPHostUrl'));
var restSource = appweburl +
"/_api/SP.AppContextSite(@target)/web/GetFolderByServerRelativeUrl('/restdocuments/testds')/files/add(url='" + filename + "',overwrite=true)?@target='" + hostweburl + "'";
var dfd = $.Deferred();
$.ajax(
'url': restSource,
'method': 'POST',
'data': content,
processData: false,
timeout:1000000,
'headers': {
'accept': 'application/json;odata=verbose',
'X-RequestDigest': $('#__REQUESTDIGEST').val(),
"content-length": content.byteLength
'success': function (data) {
var d = data;
dfd.resolve(d);
'error': function (err,textStatus,errorThrown) {
dfd.reject(err);
return dfd;
Then when this code returns you can use the following to update the metadata of the new document.
function updateMetadataNoVersion(fileUrl) {
appweburl = decodeURIComponent(getQueryStringParameter('SPAppWebUrl'));
hostweburl = decodeURIComponent(getQueryStringParameter('SPHostUrl'));
var restSource = appweburl +
"/_api/SP.AppContextSite(@target)/web/GetFolderByServerRelativeUrl('/restdocuments/testds')/files/getbyurl(url='" + fileUrl + "')/listitemallfields/validateupdatelistitem?@target='" + hostweburl + "'";
var dfd = $.Deferred();
$.ajax(
'url': restSource,
'method': 'POST',
'data': JSON.stringify({
'formValues': [
'__metadata': { 'type': 'SP.ListItemFormUpdateValue' },
'FieldName': 'Title',
'FieldValue': 'My Title2'
'bNewDocumentUpdate': true,
'checkInComment': ''
'headers': {
'accept': 'application/json;odata=verbose',
'content-type': 'application/json;odata=verbose',
'X-RequestDigest': $('#__REQUESTDIGEST').val()
'success': function (data) {
var d = data;
dfd.resolve(d);
'error': function (err) {
dfd.reject(err);
return dfd;
Blog | SharePoint Field Notes Dev Tools |
SPFastDeploy | SPRemoteAPIExplorer

Cost Object in FI document with WBS Settlement

Hi,
I'm testing WBS settlement to G/L account which is cost element. I made some substitution rules because I met an error message saying that "Cost Object is needed"
As a result I can settle WBS to cost elements such as COGS etc. I got a FI document, CO document and PCA document. Everything looked so nice.
Suddenly I noticed, however, that there is no such a thing like cost object on FI document. When I look up the FI document using FB03, I found that the PS-POSID was empty. Of course, CO documents have Cost Object.
What I wonder is as follows
1. Is this standard? Is it natural that FI document with CO doc has no cost object on it?
2. If I need to use FI document to determine WBS element, what is the best to way? Is it possible to enter Cost Object such as wbs element in FI document during settlement?
Thank you for your kind advice in advance.
Message was edited by:
Namseok Kang

Kang,
In the message which you got, the word 'Cost Object' refered to a cost center, or order, or any other cost object.
However, there is another account assignment object with the name 'Cost Object', which was not filled in the FI document. That is normal.
Right now I don't have much information in the a/c assignment object 'Cost Object'.
Regards,
Vishal.

Update the FI document with the PO customer number

Hi,
Is it possible to update a header field or item line field of customer of the FI document with the PO customer number or sales document of PO (VBAK-VBELN) at the billing moment. I cannot do by standard substitution because the original field is not saved in the table BSEG or BKPF.
Thanks,
Cecilia

It can be done via substitution with exit.
You can configure your exit and then ABAPer can define the code for that exit in the copy of the program RGGBS000 assigned to the substitution in view V_T80D (Transaction SM30)
In ABAP code you can fetch the values from various tables.
Regards,
Gaurav

Create Document Set with custom Create Only permission set

Here is the situation. We have a requirement where my customer wants to create document sets, however, document set/document level permissions are required.
Setup: We created a new permission level called "Create Only". We then give the user Read and Create only permissions. This allows the user to theoretically create the item. We then run a Workflow on create that Replaces the permissions so that
you are only allowed to view the ones you created along with other security groups based on their choices in the metadata fields.
This setup works PERFECTLY when using a List or Form Library.
However, for the life of me I cannot get it to work for Document Sets. If I have the same setup, I get an Access Denied message. However, it still creates the document set.
What is weird, I've been playing around with custom permission levels and it seems as though the user has to have EDIT permissions at a minimum in order to create the document set. This will not work for me since I dynamically assign permissions to each
document set based on what they select.
As a side note, the only tool I have at my disposal is SharePoint Designer 2010.
Does anyone know if there is an actual requirement to have EDIT permissions when creating a Document Set? Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Alternatively, is there a way to setup permissions on a library for all NT Authenticated users so that we can give them the necessary permissions to create the Document Set, but still prevent them from see the other items and then the Workflow would set
the permissions accordingly?
I believe the more granular the permissions it uses those permissions instead so would this work? I have not tested this theory yet.

Hi,
According to your description, my understanding is that you want to know if there is an actual requirement to have EDIT permissions when creating a Document Set and is there a way to setup permissions on a library for all NT Authenticated users and prevent
them from seeing items created by others.
For the first question, per my knowledge, if a user is given the Add Items permission, he/she can create a document set in SharePoint.
However, there is an error “access denied” after the document set is created. It is due to the user has no permission to access the page which SharePoint will redirect the user to after finishing creating the document set.
If the user is also given Edit Items permission, there will be no error when he/she create a document set.
For the second question, I recommend to follow the link below to
customize item permissions for each document submitted to a document library and remember to give the
NT Authenticated users contribute permission.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/spke/archive/2010/04/09/configure-item-level-permissions-for-document-libraries-sharepoint-2010-edition.aspx
To grant permission to NT Authenticated users, please refer to the link below:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-in/sharepoint-server-help/what-happened-to-add-all-authenticated-users-HA101805183.aspx
Best regards.
Thanks
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Additional document...with custom backend object

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for