ADF Query not showing correct search results.

Hi,
I am using normal ADF af:query to search data using a VO Criteria.
We have modified the getter of searched column in VORowImpl java class to return values based on NLSID search from cache.
Logic in getter:
If for a column_name nlsid is present then show data as the value of nlsid.
Suppose Initially:
column_name = "Column1"
column_name_nlsid="Column1_nlsid"
column_name_nlsid_value="Column1_nlsid_value"
The table will show:
column_name: "Column1_nlsid_value"
if we search "Column1" as column_name, The Search will also show:
column_name: "Column1_nlsid_value"
in results
But,
If we modify the nlsid value as:
column_name_nlsid_value="Column1_nlsid_value_MODIFIED"
Then
The table will show:
column_name: "Column1_nlsid_value_MODIFIED"
if we search "MODIFIED" in column_name, The Search will NOT show any results
So, it seems to me that the af:query search always searches upon the values derived from InternalAttribute values.
What can i do to over-ride such behaviour , so that the search also takes the data from modified getters.

Try posting in Jdeveloper Forum JDeveloper and ADF which has more audience

Similar Messages

LDAP Log not showing external search results

Hi,
I'm conducting LDAP searches with a filter into the LDAP directory of OD Master. Results are as expected and authentication is correct for an LDAP user. I can see the authentication in PasswordServer.
My question is, why doesn't the LDAP search show up in the LDAP Log (slapd.log)? All I get in this log are new user accounts when created showing a note that home directory attribute is not provided. I am not using home directories as AFP and Web services for groups are all that the user has access to. The preponderance of entries in LDAP Log are for
"bdbsubstringcandidates: (authAuthority) index_param failed (18)"
which has been there since 10.5 and continues despite making an index entry for authAuthority in slapd_macosxserver.conf and restarting the LDAP service.
Can someone enlighten me on the functions of LDAP Log and what should be visible there?
Harry

I just discovered that if the formulation output doesn't have any entries in the cross reference section, it will not appear in eqt search results. does this make sense? Is there some config that we can adjust to make them apper even without a cross reference?
thanks,
David

OA Query Region shows previous search results when moving between pages

Hello All,
I have a custom OA Page which has a query region based on a LOV for searching device names. The problem I am facing is once device name is searched and I go to another page through the quick links and come back to same Search Device page, it shows the previous searched results. I am not retaining AM for any page navigation.
Things I have already tried :
1 . I have tried refreshing VO by using clearcache and reset methods on VO.
2. Get the Go button from the query region in ProcessFormRequest and on Go button click I use forwardImmediatelyToCurrentPage. And in Process Request method I am querying the results manually when Go button is clicked. Otherwise I am manually making the where clause condition 1=2 and ensuring that the VO does not return any rows.
But still I am not able to get rid of the issue.
The code used is pasted below for your reference. It is urgent. Can you please provide any pointers.
public void processRequest(OAPageContext pageContext, OAWebBean webBean)
super.processRequest(pageContext, webBean);
try
VpaAdminAMImpl am = (VpaAdminAMImpl)pageContext.getApplicationModule(webBean);
TkvpaDeviceSearchVOImpl deviceAll = am.getTkvpaDeviceSearchVO1();
deviceAll.clearCache();
deviceAll.reset();
deviceAll.setWhereClause("1=2");
deviceAll.setWhereClauseParams(null);
String query = deviceAll.getQuery();
System.out.println("getSearchResult query :="+query);
deviceAll.executeQuery();
OAQueryBean queryBean = (OAQueryBean)webBean.findChildRecursive("region1");
String goAction = queryBean.getGoButtonName();
if(pageContext.getParameter(goAction) != null)
getSearchResult(am, pageContext, webBean);
catch(Exception ex)
throwException("SearchDeviceCO.processRequest",ex);
public void processFormRequest(OAPageContext pageContext, OAWebBean webBean)
super.processFormRequest(pageContext, webBean);
String action = pageContext.getParameter(EVENT_PARAM);
OAQueryBean queryBean = (OAQueryBean)webBean.findChildRecursive("region1");
String Go = queryBean.getGoButtonName();
System.out.println(pageContext.getParameter(Go));
if(pageContext.getParameter(Go) != null)
pageContext.forwardImmediatelyToCurrentPage(null,false,"N");
public void getSearchResult(VpaAdminAMImpl am, OAPageContext pageContext, OAWebBean webBean)
try
String device = pageContext.getParameter("deviceSearch");
StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer();
if(device != null && device != "")
sb.append(" DEVICE_NAME = '");
sb.append(device);
sb.append("'");
String sql = sb.toString();
TkvpaDeviceSearchVOImpl deviceAll = am.getTkvpaDeviceSearchVO1();
deviceAll.setWhereClause(sql);
deviceAll.setWhereClauseParams(null);
String query = deviceAll.getQuery();
System.out.println("getSearchResult query :="+query);
deviceAll.executeQuery();
}catch(Exception e)
e.printStackTrace();
Thanks in Advance,
Abhishek Mishra

Hi Anand,
The getSearchResult method also does the same thing. I have also tried to remove the dependency on getSearchResult and wrote the same code in ProcessRequest() but still it does not solve the problem.
In fact, I have ensured that the VO does not contain any records and have checked these by using SOPs and debug in JDEV. The interesting point is the VO does not have any records but still the previous search data and search criteria is shown when we navigate to the page. Printed the query just before performing execute query and that query does not return any records. Also tried printing something if there are any records in the VO by using vo.hasNext().
Data gets stored somewhere and it is shown when the page is navigated from other page. FYI, this page is accessed from quick links and there are other pages also in the quick links and when we navigate between these pages we get to see the previous search results. Tried methods clearCache(), reset() on VOs but still unsuccessful.
Not even that I thought that the VO may be corrupted in some sense so I created a new VO instance in the AM and then used newly created VO instance in the query region. But still no luck.
Any pointers will be appreciated.
Thanks in Advance,
Abhishek

Nautilus does not show Tracker search results

Hi,
I recently installed tracker and had it index my files. After indexing had finished, I tried tracker-search and tracker-needle, both of which returned the files I was looking for. But in Nautilus, searching via CTRL+F still only returns files whose filenames are matching my query. Nautilus does not seem to integrate Tracker search results properly, as it should according to this forum thread. Tagging files via the tracker-tags plugin in Nautilus works just fine. Re-installing nautilus did not change anything.
Any ideas what could be the problem here?
Thanks,
mfs

Hmm, I think it is supposed to use tracker if installed. At least nautilus has a build option called enable-tracker which is set to auto by default (I also compiled it with enable-tracker=yes but nothing changed). Also, "wonder" said in the thread quoted above that nautilus would use tracker and find only as fallback.
Last edited by mfs (2012-03-06 22:27:09)

Podcast accepted by iTunes, but not showing on search results after days

I submitted a podcast to iTunes about a week ago and on the 20th I received an e-mail to say that it had been accepted onto iTunes.
Several days later, however, and it still won't show up on search results. When I search for the title of the podcast, 'At The End of The Day', it doesn't show up. However, when I search for the author, 'Leigh, Mark and Toby', it DOES show up! Obviously, I want people to be able to find the podcast through its title... can anybody please help me? Thank you!
Podcast iTunes url: http://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/at-the-end-of-the-day/id393735348
RSS feed: http://attheendoftheday.podomatic.com/rss2.xml

Turned up fine for me, though it's not at the top of the page; you have to scroll down to the Podcasts section and it's the first item there.

ScoreBook Lite 8.1 App not Showing in Search Results

This app was initially published about two weeks ago with a few updates since then. Although I go directly to the app with the provide link it is not showing up in store search results? Is using keywords enough for search or should there be the
same keywords with in the description of the app?
http://apps.microsoft.com/windows/app/scorebook-lite/e7828778-3fe3-4d91-8c6e-d4664412a8e5
Thank you!

Hello EckConnect,
The search will pull from keywords and your description.
Please reach out to Dev Center Support to have them take a look at your particular app.
-Miles
Windows and Windows Phone Dev Center Support
Send us your feedback about the Windows Platform

Conversations not showing in search results

I'm experiencing an issue where every other aspect of Search seems to be working as expected but when I do a search and select "Conversation" nothing ever shows. If I go directly to the results type page (conversationresults.aspx), I see a few
things but not much. I'm not even sure where to start here. The result type exists and has never been modified. People search and all other types of search are working fine. I have no errors on any of my content sources.
Some additional details have come to light. Discussions appearing on Community Sites are showing in search almost immediately in the conversation search but I'm still not getting anything from the news feed and the "Trending Tags" web part is not
showing anything either.
I have verified the issue discussed in this question (AnalyticsHashTagWebPart Showing No Results) is not what is causing me problem.

It looks like someone had messed with the content sources. I added the newsfeed URL back to content sources and started a crawl and just like magic, conversations started showing in the results. I think the "Trending Tags" issue is not related.

OSTC Query Not Showing Correct Percent If Component is Changed

Hello gurus and experts...here is an interesting question:
Question: Why does a query not report proper Sales Tax Code percentage from OSTC table when a component is updated?
Sales Tax Code (STC) of CA-37B, with a rate of 10.25% is made up of three parts:
California (CA) State Tax Jurisdiction of "CA" with a rate of 7.00%,
County Tax Jurisdiction of "CA-37" at a rate of 1.75%,
City Tax Jurisdiction of "CA-37B" with a rate of 1.50%, and the effective date is set at 31 Dec 2008 (in the past).
When the City Tax Jurisdiction is changed to 1.00% and date of 31 Dec 2009, the OSTC of CA-37B should be 9.75%.
However, when a query is run on the OSTC table it strangely reports the old 10.25% (on the Sales Tax Code window it shows correctly as 9.75%).
Here is the query - very simple...as about as simple as it gets...
SELECT
T0.Code,
T0.Name,
T0.Rate AS 'Total Tax Percentage',
T0.Freight AS 'Freight Taxable?'
FROM OSTC T0
ORDER BY T0.Code
IF we go back to the Sales Tax Code Window and change anything (description, one of the components, etc) and hit the update button, then the query reports the correct percentage.
Am I missing something here? I would imagine that the system must be doing something and I cannot believe the workaround is just go back and update something in the Sales Tax Code window - there are a ton of updates to do with taxes each year! Trying to remember which component was updated can cause real confusion. SAP B1 does a ton of automatic updates all over the system - why would it just be this area of information in OSTC???
Thanks for reading the post, and many more thanks for your help and suggestions - Zal

OK - Question Answered - had nothing to do with the query - user did not hit "Update" two times when doing the City Tax Jurisdiction Update...
I knew SAP would be doing an auto update - has to!!!
Thanks all - Zal

Formulation outputs not showing in search results

The FOs are not showing up in any EQT search screens, show hidden specs setting is on. In the past, we've noticed that the specs show up if we put an extra dummy tag on the wfa statuses that have 7 tags. This is not working anymore.
please refer to 3 SR 3-5797044111 : WFA Tag Config and EQT Visibility Issue

I just discovered that if the formulation output doesn't have any entries in the cross reference section, it will not appear in eqt search results. does this make sense? Is there some config that we can adjust to make them apper even without a cross reference?
thanks,
David

Function used in SQL query not showing the desired results

I have created a function that gives me the client id but when i am using the function in the query its not giving me any result i.e. 0 rows but if I execute the function sepreatly and put the result of that function in the qurey it is giving me the desired result please have a look on the following and please reply with you expert opinion:
FUNCTION CODE:
create or replace function j2
(usid in varchar2)
return varchar2
is
cidn_in varchar2(4000) := '';
ls_sep varchar2(1) := ',';
cursor predicate_cidn
is
select
logical_schema_id
from
CLIENT_REGISTRY cr,
MEMBER_ROLE_CLIENT_ASSIGNMENT mrca,
MEMBER m
where
mrca.base_client_id = cr.base_client_id and
mrca.member_id = m.member_id and
cr.schema_in_use_in = '1' and
m.active_status_id = 'A' and
upper(mrca.member_id) = upper(usid);
BEGIN
for GET_CIDN in predicate_cidn
loop
cidn_in := cidn_in || ls_sep || '''' || GET_CIDN.logical_schema_id || '''';
end loop;
cidn_in := substr(cidn_in, 2);
cidn_in := '('||cidn_in||')';
--dbms_output.put_line(cidn_in);
return cidn_in;
END ;
SQL> select j2('qaa@adp') from dual;
J2('QAA@ADP')
('BASE18','SDK1TEST','SEETHA1CONFIG','BASE09','KAREN2','SIVACONFIG','BASE19','SD
K1CTEST','VASU1','KAREN5','EVENTS1CTEST','SDK1','ADA1CONFIG','BASE10','VRB1CONFI
G','CRU2CONFIG','BASE20','SIVATEST','PCOMCONFIG','KP1CONFIG','KAREN4CONFIG','EVE
NTS1TEST','SUZ3CONFIG','DONG2CONFIG','ED2CONFIG','SIVACTEST','APDCONFIG','EVENTS
1CONFIG','ESSCONFIG','SIVA','SDK2CONFIG','ED3CONFIG','RAJ4CONFIG','CBRCONFIG','N
AMRATA2CONFIG','EMIL1','NAMRATA1CONFIG','SDK2CTEST','BVT2CONFIG','MURUGAN1CONFIG
','COB1CONFIG','GABY1TEST','CHR1CONFIG','ED4CONFIG','USE1CONFIG','SDK2TEST','DEM
O1CONFIG','BERNIE1CONFIG','XA1','CAR2TEST','SDK2','ED5CONFIG','PAY1TEST','PAYXCO
NFIG','KP1TEST','SEAN1CONFIG','CAR2CTEST','VASU1CONFIG','SEAN2CONFIG','KP1CTEST'
,'MAU1CONFIG','CONWCONFIG','PAN1CONFIG','MERAJ2','PRA3CONFIG','SEAN5CONFIG','KP1
','PRA4CONFIG','CAR2CONFIG','PRA2CONFIG','SEAN6CONFIG','PRA3TEST','RPT','GABY1CT
EST','SDK3CONFIG','PRA2TEST','SEAN9CONFIG','CAR2','LV1CONFIG','PRA3CTEST','DONG1
CONFIG','TE1CONFIG','MERAJ2CONFIG','VIV1CONFIG','GABY1','SEAN2','PRA2CTEST','PRA
3','RPTCONFIG','PRA4CTEST','SEAN3','MITA1CONFIG','PRA2','RPTCTEST','PCOM1CONFIG'
,'SS2CONFIG','PAY1CONFIG','SEAN7','ANNCONFIG','BASE11','BASE02','LV2CONFIG','RPT
TEST','IMPECONFIG','SUR1CONFIG','SREEK2CONFIG','BASE03','SRINU3CONFIG','BDCONFIG
','JAY1CONFIG','AMMAN1','PRA1TEST','WPGCONFIG','BASE12','MP5CONFIG','MERAJ1','SR
INU2CONFIG','XA1CONFIG','RAJ1CONFIG','WPGCTEST','BASE04','CHRIS','RAJSCONFIG','P
ANKAJ','BASE13','WPGTEST','RAJ3CONFIG','WPG','BASE14','VASU2CONFIG','SRINU1CONFI
G','BASE05','PRA4TEST','VASU1TEST','PRA5CONFIG','NISH1CONFIG','CHRISCONFIG','SDK
3TEST','RAJ3TEST','KP2CONFIG','BASE06','DEFPCONFIG','NISH2CONFIG','CHRISCTEST','
WPSCONFIG','VASU2TEST','BASE15','GABY1CONFIG','PRA5TEST','MITA2CONFIG','BASE07',
'VASU1CTEST','KP2TEST','VASU2CTEST','LAURA3CONFIG','BASE16','CHRISTEST','WPSTEST
','VASU2','KP2CTEST','EVENTS1','BASE17','RAJ2CONFIG','WPSCTEST','BASE08','SREEK1
CONFIG','ADVE','PRA4','SDK1CONFIG','KP2','KAREN1','CRU1CONFIG','WPS')
Now if i put the results (cut and paste )in the query it gives me the results
SQL> select count(*) from baseclient.address_detail where cidn in ('BASE18','SDK1TEST','SEETHA1CONFIG','BASE09','KAREN2','SIVACONFIG','BASE19','SD
2 K1CTEST','VASU1','KAREN5','EVENTS1CTEST','SDK1','ADA1CONFIG','BASE10','VRB1CONFI
3 G','CRU2CONFIG','BASE20','SIVATEST','PCOMCONFIG','KP1CONFIG','KAREN4CONFIG','EVE
4 NTS1TEST','SUZ3CONFIG','DONG2CONFIG','ED2CONFIG','SIVACTEST','APDCONFIG','EVENTS
5 1CONFIG','ESSCONFIG','SIVA','SDK2CONFIG','ED3CONFIG','RAJ4CONFIG','CBRCONFIG','N
6 AMRATA2CONFIG','EMIL1','NAMRATA1CONFIG','SDK2CTEST','BVT2CONFIG','MURUGAN1CONFIG
7 ','COB1CONFIG','GABY1TEST','CHR1CONFIG','ED4CONFIG','USE1CONFIG','SDK2TEST','DEM
O1CONFIG','BERNIE1CONFIG','XA1','CAR2TEST','SDK2','ED5CONFIG','PAY1TEST','PAYXCO
8 9 NFIG','KP1TEST','SEAN1CONFIG','CAR2CTEST','VASU1CONFIG','SEAN2CONFIG','KP1CTEST'
10 ,'MAU1CONFIG','CONWCONFIG','PAN1CONFIG','MERAJ2','PRA3CONFIG','SEAN5CONFIG','KP1
11 ','PRA4CONFIG','CAR2CONFIG','PRA2CONFIG','SEAN6CONFIG','PRA3TEST','RPT','GABY1CT
12 EST','SDK3CONFIG','PRA2TEST','SEAN9CONFIG','CAR2','LV1CONFIG','PRA3CTEST','DONG1
13 CONFIG','TE1CONFIG','MERAJ2CONFIG','VIV1CONFIG','GABY1','SEAN2','PRA2CTEST','PRA
14 3','RPTCONFIG','PRA4CTEST','SEAN3','MITA1CONFIG','PRA2','RPTCTEST','PCOM1CONFIG'
15 ,'SS2CONFIG','PAY1CONFIG','SEAN7','ANNCONFIG','BASE11','BASE02','LV2CONFIG','RPT
16 TEST','IMPECONFIG','SUR1CONFIG','SREEK2CONFIG','BASE03','SRINU3CONFIG','BDCONFIG
17 ','JAY1CONFIG','AMMAN1','PRA1TEST','WPGCONFIG','BASE12','MP5CONFIG','MERAJ1','SR
18 INU2CONFIG','XA1CONFIG','RAJ1CONFIG','WPGCTEST','BASE04','CHRIS','RAJSCONFIG','P
19 ANKAJ','BASE13','WPGTEST','RAJ3CONFIG','WPG','BASE14','VASU2CONFIG','SRINU1CONFI
20 G','BASE05','PRA4TEST','VASU1TEST','PRA5CONFIG','NISH1CONFIG','CHRISCONFIG','SDK
21 3TEST','RAJ3TEST','KP2CONFIG','BASE06','DEFPCONFIG','NISH2CONFIG','CHRISCTEST','
22 WPSCONFIG','VASU2TEST','BASE15','GABY1CONFIG','PRA5TEST','MITA2CONFIG','BASE07',
23 'VASU1CTEST','KP2TEST','VASU2CTEST','LAURA3CONFIG','BASE16','CHRISTEST','WPSTEST
24 ','VASU2','KP2CTEST','EVENTS1','BASE17','RAJ2CONFIG','WPSCTEST','BASE08','SREEK1
25 CONFIG','ADVE','PRA4','SDK1CONFIG','KP2','KAREN1','CRU1CONFIG','WPS');
COUNT(*)
228
BUT if I user the function it gives me no results
0 rows selected and its taking a loon time to reurn

This appears to be a duplicate of the question in this thread
Re: VPD issue Need Assistance ASAP
where I wrote
"Your function returns a single string that happens to have a bunch of commas and quotes in it. An IN list generally requires a list of strings, which your function doesn't return.
You could rewrite the function to be a pipelined table function and then do
select count(*)
from baseclient.address_detail
where cidn in (SELECT cidn
FROM TABLE(<<your pipelined table function>>))
However, I would expect it to be easier not to wrap all this into a function and just have your IN clause be the logic in your predicate_cidn cursor.
Justin
"

Google apps not showing in search results on ios6

Since upgrading to iOS6 on my iPhone and iPad, I'm unable to see the Google or G+ app in a search result.
I still have the apps on my home screen but if I swipe to search for a Google app, a list of address book contacts returns instead of a Google app.
Very dissapointed that Apple isn't signing 5.1.1 anymore as their exit from all things Google, replaced by substandard apps is not good enough.

Thanks. I have the Chrome app. This is not the issue. This bug is not a browser issue. It occurs when I search 'in phone' not in browser. I have the Google and G+ app installed on two devices. The latest software update hasn't removed them from my homescreen but Apples in phone search function doesn't find them anymore. By 'in phone search' I mean if you go to your first page of apps and then swipe to the right to reveal a search box.

Duplicate files affixed with a "-1" not showing in search results

When I download files from the internet sometimes I get the same file twice and of course OS X affixes a "-1" to denote this, however when I search a folder (via the top right search tool) for any files containing "-1" in the file name (boolean) it does not show them, why is this?

If you try Easy Find and don't like it you can unistall it just by deleting the App.
It is one of the best Search programs I have used on either Mac or Windows.
You may also like to try Find Any File.
As to not using any 3rd party apps, well that is odd. Apple does not make all apps for all operations/needs. So at some point you will need to use an appplication written and sold by some other software company. So you don't use any Adobe software or any other software from other software companies?

Log application query not showing correct results

Hi,
We are running Dataguard (DG) in our production environment. EBS 11.5.10.2 and DB 10.2.0.4.
Every morning we run the following query on both primary and standby to confirm that the logs are being transported and applied to the standby:
select sequence#,applied,to_char(first_time,'mm/dd/yy hh24:mi:ss') first from v$archived_log order by first_time;
Once the logs are transported and applied, a response of 'Yes' is returned for each log generated. We have noticed within the last week that when we run the query on primary, 'No' is being returned, but on standby, 'Yes' is returned. I have confirmed that standby is reflecting the correct results. I've tried restarting the DG service (alter database recover managed standby....) in an attempt to have primary 'refresh' itself but that didn't work.
Does anyone have any idea why primary keeps returning 'No' to the query, and how we can get it to reflect to correct results?
Thanks,
Lia.

Hi Werner,
Thanks for your response. Given what you're saying I find that a little strange since prior to this, the query would return a value of 'YES' on the primary. Actually, to be exact, on the primary, each log would should up twice. One would show 'NO' and the other 'YES'- the second indicating transporting and shipping was successful.
This is how the results were before:
SEQUENCE APP FIRST
+154623 NO 04/07/09 08:03:22+
+154623 YES 04/07/09 08:03:22+
+154624 NO 04/07/09 08:05:27+
+154624 YES 04/07/09 08:05:27+
This is how the results are now:
SEQUENCE APP FIRST
+154754 NO 04/22/09 07:22:22+
+154754 NO 04/22/09 07:22:22+
+154755 NO 04/22/09 07:25:27+
+154755 NO 04/22/09 07:25:27+
I'm not doubting that what you're saying is correct, it just adds an element of confusion for me...
Lia.

VL06I Inbound delivery monitor not showing correct results

Dears,
We are creating inbound deliveries on the basis of POs and creating GR via MIGO after eliminating movement type in line item catageory by using SPRO. For monitoring we would like to use VL06I but its not showing correct results.
Can anyone guid me ?
Regards,
FR

You can list all Inbound Deliveries by selecting "List Inbound Deliveries" Tab in VL06I
May be if you can little elaborate the issue

RH10: Snippets from resource manager show in search results

I'm new to using the resource manager, so there's a good chance I've done something stupid here... but...
I have 2 projects (I am the only tech writer, so running off one PC, no version control). I want to share snippets between the projects, so I'm using the resource manager to keep them synched up. Both are compiled as CHMs.
When I search, I'm getting search results that appear to be the snippets in the results. When you double click them, they don't open.
Here's a screenshot of what I'm seeing.
Has anyone else seen this before? I'm using RH10.

I have set up a test and cannot get snippets to show in search results.
I am a little puzzled by the fact that you say they appear to be snippets, thus casting some doubt.
Do you have snippets with those names and do the snippets contain the term being searched.
Do you have topics with those names?
Does it happen in a new project?
Try creating a new SSL, not a duplicate.
See www.grainge.org for RoboHelp and Authoring tips
@petergrainge

ADF Query not showing correct search results.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for