VL06I Inbound delivery monitor not showing correct results

Dears,
We are creating inbound deliveries on the basis of POs and creating GR via MIGO after eliminating movement type in line item catageory by using SPRO. For monitoring we would like to use VL06I but its not showing correct results.
Can anyone guid me ?
Regards,
FR

You can list all Inbound Deliveries by selecting "List Inbound Deliveries" Tab in VL06I
May be if you can little elaborate the issue

Similar Messages

Aggregation not showing correct results in 10g

Hi,
We have created a calculated column in BMM layer as x=Sum(Amount)/sum(Distinct Members).
In the report, individually it is showing correct results but when we are calculating "Total By" it is showing wrong total.This is because of while calculating totals it is taking the formula as x=Sum(Amount)/sum(Members).
Aggregations are kept as default for all the columns in the report .
Please help me to solve this issue.

For this calculated column set aggregation level as sum.

Log application query not showing correct results

Hi,
We are running Dataguard (DG) in our production environment. EBS 11.5.10.2 and DB 10.2.0.4.
Every morning we run the following query on both primary and standby to confirm that the logs are being transported and applied to the standby:
select sequence#,applied,to_char(first_time,'mm/dd/yy hh24:mi:ss') first from v$archived_log order by first_time;
Once the logs are transported and applied, a response of 'Yes' is returned for each log generated. We have noticed within the last week that when we run the query on primary, 'No' is being returned, but on standby, 'Yes' is returned. I have confirmed that standby is reflecting the correct results. I've tried restarting the DG service (alter database recover managed standby....) in an attempt to have primary 'refresh' itself but that didn't work.
Does anyone have any idea why primary keeps returning 'No' to the query, and how we can get it to reflect to correct results?
Thanks,
Lia.

Hi Werner,
Thanks for your response. Given what you're saying I find that a little strange since prior to this, the query would return a value of 'YES' on the primary. Actually, to be exact, on the primary, each log would should up twice. One would show 'NO' and the other 'YES'- the second indicating transporting and shipping was successful.
This is how the results were before:
SEQUENCE APP FIRST
+154623 NO 04/07/09 08:03:22+
+154623 YES 04/07/09 08:03:22+
+154624 NO 04/07/09 08:05:27+
+154624 YES 04/07/09 08:05:27+
This is how the results are now:
SEQUENCE APP FIRST
+154754 NO 04/22/09 07:22:22+
+154754 NO 04/22/09 07:22:22+
+154755 NO 04/22/09 07:25:27+
+154755 NO 04/22/09 07:25:27+
I'm not doubting that what you're saying is correct, it just adds an element of confusion for me...
Lia.

CKF not showing correct results in BEx Analyzer

Dear Friends,
I am getting different results when viewed from BEx Analyzer and Web Analyzer for the same query. BEx Analyzer shows incorrect results. The column that is showing different is a local formula (say Formula3) that is a result of dividing Formula1 by Formula2.
BEx Web calculates Formula3 correctly while BEx analyzer does not.
I am in BI 7.0 SP 10.
Any Clues?
Thanks
Viren

For this calculated column set aggregation level as sum.

Inventory Non cumulative values are not showing correct result

Hi Guys,
I have created a report on Inventory cube taking material in rows and 0T0TALSTCK and 0VALSTCKVAL in colums and i created a variable on calender day . What ever the date if we give we will get the quantity and value as on that date.
Here Quantity is showing perfectly and in case of value it is showing wrongly. In this case the interesting thing is if we substract the (Reciet value - Issue ) value then i am getting the correct value.
Some times Even quantity is zero the noncumulative keyfigure (0VALSTCKVAL)is not showing zero it is showing some value but if i do (Reciet value - Issue ) it will show correctly.
Please help on this issue.
Thanks & Regards
K.Srinivas

Hi,
when the quantity is correct, then you have a problem with the values. You have loaded the infocube correcly.
check your keyfigures and the transformation with the BI content.
=> for example: do you have the coding in the BF transformation?
* see OSS note 571669
    LOOP AT SOURCE_PACKAGE ASSIGNING <SOURCE_FIELDS>.
      IF <SOURCE_FIELDS>-stockcat EQ 'V' OR
         <SOURCE_FIELDS>-stocktype EQ 'V'.
        DELETE SOURCE_PACKAGE.
      ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
=> you have used the datasource 2LIS_03_UM. There are no quantities. Is there your problem.
Sven

Report not showing correct results

I am new to SSRS. Using SQL 2008, Visual Studio 2010 shell.
I have a stored procedure that when I execute it through SSMS, it returns the correct results. However, when my report runs through SSRS (using the same stored procedure). I get inconsistent results.
I've been able to narrow it down to a specific parameter in my report where I pass in Id's. This particular parameter gets its values from a query and is setup to use multiple values. I have focused on two ID's which together are giving
me problems.
The IDs are !'" and
!!T.
When I ONLY select !'" the report returns the correct results.
When I ONLY select !!T the report return the correct results.
When I select !'" and !!T the report only return the results for !!T.
I have no clue why SSRS doesn't like this. Any help would be appreciated.
jhoop

I created the specific function referenced in your link and it didn't help.
Function
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[c__SplitValues]
-- Add the parameters for the function here
@List nvarchar(2000)
,@SplitOn nvarchar(2000)
RETURNS
@RtnValue TABLE
-- Add the column definitions for the TABLE variable here
Id int identity(1,1)
,Value nvarchar(100)
AS
BEGIN
-- Fill the table variable with the rows for your result set
While(CHARINDEX(@SplitOn, @List) > 0)
BEGIN
INSERT INTO @RtnValue (value)
SELECT
VALUE = LTRIM(RTRIM(SUBSTRING(@List, 1, CHARINDEX(@SplitOn, @List) - 1)))
SET @List = SUBSTRING(@List, CHARINDEX(@SplitOn, @List) + LEN(@SplitOn), LEN(@List))
END
INSERT INTO @RtnValue (Value)
SELECT Value = LTRIM(RTRIM(@List))
RETURN
END
The line in my SQL statement where I use this function
AND TableName.UserId IN (SELECT Value FROM dbo.c__SplitValues(@UserId,','))
jhoop

Explain Plan not showing correct results.

Hi Gurus,
Please help me to understand below issue.
Whenever I am doing explain plan on any of the sql statements it says as explained but when retriving the explain plan output it shows same results again and again.
DB - 11gR2 Stand alone
ASM - Configured.
OS - RHEL 6.2.
SQL> select count(*) from t2114;
COUNT(*)
639292
SQL> explain plan for select count(*) from t2114;
Explained.
SQL> @?/rdbms/admin/utlxpls.sql
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 1497650422
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 6634 | 524K| 2993 (19)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 6634 | 524K| 2993 (19)| 00:00:01 |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T2210 | 6634 | 524K| 2947 (17)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | T2210_T | 6842 | | 108 (22)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
3 - access("T2210"."C490008000"=:SYS_B_0 AND "T2210"."C490009100"=:SYS_B_2
AND "T2210"."C301363300"=TO_NUMBER(:SYS_B_1))
16 rows selected.
SQL> explain plan for
2 SELECT T2114.C1 FROM T2114 WHERE ((T2114.C1000000001 = :"SYS_B_0") AND (T2114.C536871442 = :"SYS_B_1") AND (T2114.C536871477 = :"SYS_B_2") AND ((:"SYS_B_3" - T2114.C3) >= :"SYS_B_4") AND ((:"SYS_B_5" - T2114.C3) <= :"SYS_B_6") AND (T2114.C1000000217 LIKE :"SYS_B_7") AND (T2114.C536871478 < :"SYS_B_8")) ORDER BY C1000000161 DESC, :"SYS_B_9" ASC;
Explained.
SQL> SELECT * FROM TABLE(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 1497650422
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 6634 | 524K| 2993 (19)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 6634 | 524K| 2993 (19)| 00:00:01 |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T2210 | 6634 | 524K| 2947 (17)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | T2210_T | 6842 | | 108 (22)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
3 - access("T2210"."C490008000"=:SYS_B_0 AND "T2210"."C490009100"=:SYS_B_2
AND "T2210"."C301363300"=TO_NUMBER(:SYS_B_1))
16 rows selected.

Hi Dom,
Thanks for your immediate response.
I am getting two values for PLAN_TABLE. Please let me know if we need to drop any of them??
SQL> SELECT *
FROM all_objects
WHERE object_name = 'PLAN_TABLE'; 2 3
OWNER OBJECT_NAME SUBOBJECT_NAME OBJECT_ID DATA_OBJECT_ID OBJECT_TYPE CREATED LAST_DDL_TIME TIMESTAMP STATUS T G S NAMESPACE EDITION_NAME
PUBLIC PLAN_TABLE 5127 SYNONYM 17-SEP-11 17-SEP-11 2011-09-17:09:47:47 VALID N N N 1
ARADMIN PLAN_TABLE 219426 219426 TABLE 07-APR-13 07-APR-13 2013-04-07:23:01:12 VALID N N N 1

W540 + Ultradock: External monitors not showing correct maximum resolution

I have three 20" LCD monitors and the Ultra Dock. I am connecting them as: 1 with VGA, 1 with DisplayPort to DVI cable and 1 with DVI cable.
The ones one the DisplayPort and one with DVI both show a max resolution of 1280x1024 even though the monitor has a native resolution of 1600x1200. The VGA connected monitor shows the correct maximum resolution.
When I connect the DVI cable to into the mini-displayport connection on the laptop itself, that same monitor shows the proper 1600x1200 resolution.
Is there some limitation here preventing me from using the full 1600x1200 resolution through the dock?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Solved!
My dock already had the same version as the update file. Plus, the description of item fixed did not match my issue. I had no blinking or missing screens, I had too low of resolution.
...But I have found the solution on my own.
Surprisingly I have not see it discussed anywhere on this forum. I found the answer here:
http://download.lenovo.com/ibmdl/pub/pc/pccbbs/mobiles/gjde49ww.txt
It contains the following information:
In Standard mode, all dock displays uses Integrated Graphics as display output
and is limited to a maximum of 3 displays including Computer's LCD.
While in Advanced mode, all dock displays uses Discrete Graphics as display
output and it increases the maximum number of displays to 6 including Computer's LCD.
Also:
ThinkPad W540 (Standard Mode)
Intel HD Graphics
- (Computer's LCD)
- Computer's analog VGA connector
- Computer's DisplayPort connector
- Docking Station's analog VGA connector
- Docking Station's DVI connector(s)
- Docking Station's DisplayPort connector(s)
- Docking Station's HDMI connector
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M or NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
- No display is connected to this display adapter.
ThinkPad W540 (Advanced Mode)
Intel HD Graphics Family
- (Computer's LCD)
- Computer's analog VGA connector
- Computer's DisplayPort connector
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M or NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
- Docking Station's analog VGA connector
- Docking Station's DVI connector(s)
- Docking Station's DisplayPort connector(s)
- Docking Station's HDMI connector
Something about this really prevents the resolution I wanted.
I switched to advanced mode in the BIOS as such:
The procedure below allows user to select "Standard mode" or "Advanced mode"
1. Power off the computer.
2. Power on the computer.
3. While the "To interrupt normal startup, press Enter" message is displayed
at the lower-left area or lower-center area of the screen, press the F1 key.
The ThinkPad Setup menu will be displayed.
4. Choose "Config" then "Display" to show the menu.
5. Select "Video Mode on Dock" and press Enter.
6. Select "Standard" or "Advanced" for your preference
7. Press F10 key and select "Yes" to save and exit from Setup menu. Then the
computer is restarted.
After a few reboots, I have proper resolution on all displays.
Not sure if there are any downsides to advanced mode, but it certainly feels like it is my solution. This gets me back to what just worked fine with the W530 I had before this.

Search on Keyword not showing correct results

I tagged all 5k of my images keywords. Basically people's names of who is in the image.
I then ran a search by person's name, but a lot of the results do not contain the keyword I searched for.
In the results I checked the metadata tab under Keywords: and my search term is not listed.
Am I missing something?
thanks

Yes, I added the keywords using 'Batch Change....'
The Keyword HUD shows all my keywords listed right there at the root. ie. My keywords are not under any other keywords. ie. iPhoto/Raw or Personal/Backyard
Ta

Set in Excel using ORDER MDX statement not showing correct results on PowerPivot model

I have defined a set in Excel 2013 with this syntax:
order(Topcount([Company].[Company].[Company].members,
10,
[Measures].[Sum of TotalValue]),[Measures].[Sum of TotalValue]
,DESC)
The order statements is not properly Applied. Order by name is still active. Would appreciate your help, if have I done something wrong or is this a bug?

Ok in the meantime I have solved this myself. In the field settings is an option for "Automatically order and remove duplicates..." which is turned on by default and overrules specific order statements in the set. I am not quite sure why but as long as
you know about it, this can be addressed by turning off.

Delivery Date in Inbound delivery document not correct

Dear all,
I have a question with regards to the wrong delivery date appear in our inbound delivery.
Our inbound delivery is created via EDI output in the outbound delivery of a standard SAP cross company stock transport order. The delivery date in the inbound delivery is not correct from a business point of view.
+The correct delivery date in the inbound delivery document should be [the Actual GI date field in the outbound delivery] + [transport time (i.e. route field) in the outbound delivery].+
Either way (i.e. the Actual GI date field is later/earlier than the planned GI in the outbound delivery), the delivery date in the inbound delivery is also wrong.
Do you have any idea? We have tried to change the inbound delivery type EL by setting a flag (i.e. X) in the rescheduling (TVLK-NEUTE), and it still doesnu2019t work.
Please help.
Thanks.
Tuff

Does anyone know this problem?
appreciate some feedback.

ADF Query not showing correct search results.

Hi,
I am using normal ADF af:query to search data using a VO Criteria.
We have modified the getter of searched column in VORowImpl java class to return values based on NLSID search from cache.
Logic in getter:
If for a column_name nlsid is present then show data as the value of nlsid.
Suppose Initially:
column_name = "Column1"
column_name_nlsid="Column1_nlsid"
column_name_nlsid_value="Column1_nlsid_value"
The table will show:
column_name: "Column1_nlsid_value"
if we search "Column1" as column_name, The Search will also show:
column_name: "Column1_nlsid_value"
in results
But,
If we modify the nlsid value as:
column_name_nlsid_value="Column1_nlsid_value_MODIFIED"
Then
The table will show:
column_name: "Column1_nlsid_value_MODIFIED"
if we search "MODIFIED" in column_name, The Search will NOT show any results
So, it seems to me that the af:query search always searches upon the values derived from InternalAttribute values.
What can i do to over-ride such behaviour , so that the search also takes the data from modified getters.

Try posting in Jdeveloper Forum JDeveloper and ADF which has more audience

Why this query does not show the result?

Why the query with the schema prefixed does not show the result and the query without schema display the correct results?
SQL> select data_object_id,object_type from dba_objects where object_name='HR'.'JOBS';
select data_object_id,object_type from dba_objects where object_name='HR'.'JOBS'
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
SQL> select data_object_id,object_type from dba_objects where object_name='HR.JOBS';
no rows selected
SQL> select data_object_id, OWNER, object_type from dba_objects where object_name='JOBS';
DATA_OBJECT_ID     OWNER                          OBJECT_TYPE
69662              HR                                 TABLE
                   OE                                 SYNONYM
SQL> SELECT USER FROM DUAL;
USER
SYS

Hi,
the column object_name refers to a object_name which is 'JOBS', the column owner refers to the owner 'HR', the value isn't stored together, so you have to select the two columns. It is the same behaviour as every other table/view. Have a look at the values in the view DBA_OBJECTS.
Herald ten Dam
Superconsult.nl

Delivery Date in inbound delivery doc not accurate

Dear all,
I have a question with regards to the wrong delivery date appear in our inbound delivery.
Our inbound delivery is created via a message output in the outbound delivery of a standard SAP cross company stock transport order. The delivery date in the inbound delivery is not correct from a business point of view.
+The correct delivery date in the inbound delivery document should be [the Actual GI date field in the outbound delivery] + [transport time (i.e. route field) in the outbound delivery].+
Either way (i.e. the Actual GI date field is later/earlier than the planned GI in the outbound delivery), the delivery date in the inbound delivery is also wrong.
Do you have any idea? We have tried to change the inbound delivery type EL by setting a flag (i.e. X) in the rescheduling (TVLK-NEUTE), and it still doesnu2019t work.
Please help.
Thanks.
Tuff

implements SAP Note 1316614

Query not showing detailed result when run through query Designer or Portal

Hi,
There is one query which not showing detailed result while running through Query Designer or run in Portal.
But strange thing is that it is showing the detailed result when i run it through BeX Analyzer.
While all the other queries don't have this problem in system. All showing the correct detailed result.
If anyone have some idea on this issue plz let me know.
Regards,
Javed
Edited by: Javed Akhtar on Jul 7, 2009 3:59 PM

Hi,
We can do this setting in WAD. Please check the web template and try to remove that setting. When you have hierarchy then we can display only till certain level in portal, this setting is done in web template APIs, but in bex analyzer you can see all the detailed information.
Edited
Go through this thread for some more detailed information
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/44/7b5f0a95ce12d0e10000000a422035/frameset.htm
Regards,
rik

VL06I Inbound delivery monitor not showing correct results

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for