ADF view : auto commit delete operation

I have created a ADF table with add and delete operation. When I perform delete operation it is not committing automatically.
Can you please suggest the way to auto commit the delete operation.
Thanks,
Kiran

User,
please always tell us your jdev version as the solution might depend on it.
There is no auto commit in ADF. You can program it so that after an add or delete the data gets committed but there is nothing done automatically.
if you use a bounded task flow you can drag the operation from the data control onto the task flow and navigate to it after you have done the add or delete operation.
Timo

Similar Messages

ADF delete from more than one table with single delete operation

Hi all,
I have a scenario in which I am trying to delete record(s) from 3 tables.
My jspx page looks like this:
Column1:drop down from 1st table
Column2:drop down from 2nd table
Column3:drop down from 3rd table
Delete Commit
I have created a view object which has these three tables as entities. I drag dropped the view object and displayed these three columns.
Now when i select any one or all three or any two out of these and click delete, only the "column 1" gets deleted from 1st table. The remaining two tables remain unaffected.
Y is this so?
Can't I use one delete operation for all three tables' DML operation in single go?
Thanks.

If you have a business case that requires deleting from 3 tables at once when removing a single row in a view object then you may look for the problem in you data model...
Until then I'd suggest to create a database view providing the information you need (plus the PKs fron the individual tables) and creating entity and view objects based on this view. An "instead of dele" trigger attached to the view can do the actual delete operation on the 3 tables.
bye
TPD

Delete operation is not working to delete selected row from ADF table

Hi All,
We are working on jdev 11.1.1.5.3. We have one ADF table as shown below. My requirement is to delete a selected row from table, but it is deleting the first row only.
<af:table value="#{bindings.EventCalendarVO.collectionModel}" var="row"
rows="#{bindings.EventCalendarVO.rangeSize}"
emptyText="#{bindings.EventCalendarVO.viewable ? applcoreBundle.TABLE_EMPTY_TEXT_NO_ROWS_YET : applcoreBundle.TABLE_EMPTY_TEXT_ACCESS_DENIED}"
fetchSize="#{bindings.EventCalendarVO.rangeSize}"
rowBandingInterval="0"
selectedRowKeys="#{bindings.EventCalendarVO.collectionModel.selectedRow}"
selectionListener="#{bindings.EventCalendarVO.collectionModel.makeCurrent}"
rowSelection="single" id="t2" partialTriggers="::ctb1 ::ctb3"
>
To perform delete operation i have one delete button.
<af:commandToolbarButton
text="Delete"
disabled="#{!bindings.Delete.enabled}"
id="ctb3" accessKey="d"
actionListener="#{AddNewEventBean. *deleteCurrentRow* }"/>
As normal delete operation is not working i am using programatic approach from bean method. This approach works with jdev 11.1.1.5.0 but fails on ver 11.1.1.5.3
public void deleteCurrentRow (ActionEvent actionEvent) *{* DCBindingContainer bindings =
(DCBindingContainer)BindingContext.getCurrent().getCurrentBindingsEntry();
DCIteratorBinding dcItteratorBindings =
bindings.findIteratorBinding("EventCalendarVOIterator");
// Get an object representing the table and what may be selected within it
ViewObject eventCalVO = dcItteratorBindings.getViewObject();
// Remove selected row
eventCalVO.removeCurrentRow();
it is removing first row from table still. Main problem is not giving the selected row as current row. Any one point out where is the mistake?
We have tried the below code as well in deleteCurrentRow() method
RowKeySet rowKeySet = (RowKeySet)this.getT1().getSelectedRowKeys();
CollectionModel cm = (CollectionModel)this.getT1().ggetValue();
for (Object facesTreeRowKey : rowKeySet) {
cm.setRowKey(facesTreeRowKey);
JUCtrlHierNodeBinding rowData = (JUCtrlHierNodeBinding)cm.getRowData();
rowData.getRow().remove();
The same behavior still.
Thanks in advance.
Rechin
Edited by: 900997 on Mar 7, 2012 3:56 AM
Edited by: 900997 on Mar 7, 2012 4:01 AM
Edited by: 900997 on Mar 7, 2012 4:03 AM

JDev 11.1.1.5.3 sounds like you are using oracle apps as this not a normal jdev version.
as it works in 11.1.1.5.0 you probably hit a bug which you should file with support.oracle.com...
Somehow you get the first row instead of the current row (i guess). You should debug your code and make sure you get the current selected row in your bean code and not the first row.
This might be a problem with the bean scope too. Do you have the button (or table) inside a region? Wich scope does the bean have?
Anyway you can try to remove the iterator row you get
public void deleteCurrentRow (ActionEvent actionEvent) { DCBindingContainer bindings =
(DCBindingContainer)BindingContext.getCurrent().getCurrentBindingsEntry();
DCIteratorBinding dcItteratorBindings =
bindings.findIteratorBinding("EventCalendarVOIterator");
dcItteratorBindings.removeCurrentRow();Timo

ADF Table Refresh/Commit on Delete

ADF 11g in jDeveloper 11.1.1.1.0
So, I have an ADF Table component in a panel collection. Within the collection, I added a menu with menu item to delete the current row. The delete row is not being committed. Is there a way to do a row delete in one operation?
Note:
I just drug the delete operation form the data control onto the menu item.
Action Listener: #{bindings.Delete.execute}
Partial Submit: true
Edited by: SK Jennings on Aug 13, 2009 10:14 AM
Added more info
Edited by: SK Jennings on Aug 13, 2009 10:17 AM

You can easily solve it if you just bind the table to a property in the bean as it is in the link poste by Frank.
I usually do it this way. I have not used findComponent().
My table ID is "table1".Here are a few tests I tried:
    private RichTable rt;
    FacesContext fc = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
    System.out.println(rt.getClientId(fc));     // returns something like this : pt1:dynam1:1:drvpc1:table1
    fc.getViewRoot().findComponent("table1"); // returns null
    fc.getViewRoot().findComponent(rt.getClientId(fc));   // returns null, I expected that one to work
    AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance().addPartialTarget(rt); // This one works.I hope that helps,
Valery
Edited by: Valhery on 2009-9-18 4:16

How the Auto Commit works in APEX

Hi,
I have a PL\SQL Process which consist of suppose insert / update / delete statements.
insert into emp ()
values ()
update emp
set
delete from emp
where empno = Just want to know..when apex do the Auto Commit..I mean after each DML operation.
Thanks,
Deepak

Thanks..Varad for the response.
one more clarification.
suppose I have a PL\Process and I am having the following DML in sequence, DML is for the same table EMP
insert into emp (empno) values (1234)
delete from emp where empno != 1234First I am inserting into EMP and based on that insert, I am doing some delete from the same table EMP.
so when I come to delete part, the data '1234' into EMP table must be commited, so want to know if I have to issue a COMMIT after the insert statement.
Thanks,
Deepak

Delete operation not commited

Hello,
I have a Delete operation which is never commited. When I click on delete button, the view object's row is deleted. But when I click on Commit button (which is the Commit operation of the Root Application Module), the delete operation is not commited. Debugging, I see that doDML method is not called.
Any idea on what happens?

Yes the View is editable.
I can't create a fresh page to test this, but I can test directly debugging the application module. And I have the same problem. If I update or create a row, I can commit. But if I delete a row, the Commit button is not enabled.
With "Commit Button from Application Module Data Controls > Operations > Commit/Rollback", did you mean to execute Commit operation from bindings? If yes, it's same problem.
Maybe it is because of some hacks I have done in VOImpl classes. I will see if I can test this without my hacks.

ADF row header and delete all problem

Hi,
I am using JDeveloper 11.1.14 and ADF-Bc in my project.
In one of my page I display a simple table and a button which deletes the selected records.
I dragged and dropped the 'Delete' operation from the Data Control view object onto the bindings.
The below method iterates through selected rows and calls the 'Delete' operation which removes the current row.
The Code for delete is as below
public void deleteSelectedRows(ActionEvent actionEvent) {
RowKeySet selectedRows = richTable.getSelectedRowKeys();
Iterator selRowIter = selectedRows.iterator();
RowSetIterator empRSIter = voIter.getRowSetIterator();
while (selRowIter.hasNext()) {
Key key = (Key)((List)selRowIter.next()).get(0);
Row currentRow = empRSIter.getRow(key);
if (currentRow != null) {
voIter.getViewObject().setCurrentRow(currentRow);
OperationBinding operation =
getBindingContainer().getOperationBinding("Delete");
if (operation != null) {
operation.execute();
I have added row header as column in my jsp page inside af:table. ex: <af:column rowHeader="true" width="12" id="c16"/>
The problem is that if I manually select all rows[using control key] and click on 'Delete' button, the method is working fine[all records are being deleted].
But If select all records either thorugh ctrl+A or on click of top of row header, all records are being selected in U.i,but the delete operation is not deleting
all the records.It deletes only part of the records.[Ex: say 7 out of 10 records being displayed].
Please let me know where I am doing wrong. or if it has something to do with range size.
Regards,
Praveen
Note: I have multi selection enabled on the table

Hi Frank,
I have few more observations to add.
In the below code, if the row removal is commented out, then the selected row count(i.e size ex: 9)
and the index counter printed are correct.[i.e for example index counter printed will be 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
RowKeySet rowKeySet = (RowKeySet)richTable.getSelectedRowKeys();
System.out.println("\nSIZZE"+rowKeySet.size());
CollectionModel cm = (CollectionModel)richTable.getValue();
int index = 1;
for (Object facesTreeRowKey : rowKeySet)
cm.setRowKey(facesTreeRowKey);
JUCtrlHierNodeBinding rowData =
(JUCtrlHierNodeBinding)cm.getRowData();
System.out.println("index"+index);
index++;
// rowData.getRow().remove();
But when row removal is present then the index counter displayed is also wrong.. [ex: 1,2,3,4,5,6]
Same behavior is observed with 'Delete' operation also.
Regards,
Praveen

Track the delete operation.

Guys,
I've an Oracle table from which records get deleted very often.
I would like to track the user(and the system name) who issued the delete operation,timestamp of the operation and the no. of records deleted from the user's transaction.Can someone help me with a procedure for this task?
Thanks,
Sevuga.

Thanks Jameel.
I've got it working now.
Let me share the steps that I've followed to set the auditing 'ON' on the table concerned.
CONNECT system/manager AS SYSDBA
-- Truncate the database audit table.
-- The database audit table was truncated so any old audited information will be deleted for
TRUNCATE TABLE aud$
-- View the AUDIT_TRAIL parameter value.
SHOW PARAMETER audit_trail
-- The NONE value indicates that the audit process was not activated.
-- Change the AUDIT_TRAIL parameter to db.
ALTER SYSTEM SET audit_trail=db SCOPE=spfile
-- Shutdown and startup the database. Use the default Server Parameter File (SPFILE).
-- Notice that when the AUDIT_TRAIL option is set to db, our audit trail information is stored in the AUD$ table owned by sys.
-- And also, when AUDIT_TRAIL is set to Operating System,ouraudit trail information will be stored in the director named by the AUDIT_FILE_DEST parameter.
-- In our case, we are storing data into the AUD$ table in the Oracle database.
SHUTDOWN IMMEDIATE
CONNECT system/manager AS SYSDBA
STARTUP
-- View the AUDIT_TRAIL value again.
SHOW PARAMETER audit_trail
-- Notice that this time, the value would be changed to db.
-- Query the AUD$ table.
SELECT * FROM aud$
-- Notice that there are no records in the audit table.
-- Audit who ever deleted a record from the EMP table.
AUDIT DELETE
ON emp
BY ACCESS
WHENEVER SUCCESSFUL
-- Connect as the normal user.
CONNECT scott/tiger
DELETE FROM emp
WHERE empno = 9999
COMMIT
-- Connect again as the SYSTEM/MANAGER user.
CONNECT system/manager AS SYSDBA
-- View the SYS.AUD$ table to display the date and time who (username), and what (statement of an action) was done.
SELECT
TO_CHAR(timestamp#,'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') as "Date and Time",
userid, name "Action by user"
FROM sys.aud$ JOIN sys.audit_actions
ON action = action#
Thanks,
Sevuga

Need to Set Current Row when Using Built-in Data Control Delete Operation?

I have an af:table bound to a ViewObject (VO) collection (no Entity Object) - within each row, I include a column that contains a 'Remove' command button so the user can remove the row. I add the command button by dragging/dropping the built-in delete operation from the VO on the Data Control Palette. When I use this as is (no changes), the Remove button always deletes the first row in the collection, not the selected row. Do I need to add code to set the current row, and if so can someone please provide an example and specify where I need to add? thanks.
------ .jspx af:table with command button to remove each row ------
<af:table value="#{bindings.ListView1.collectionModel}" var="row"
rows="#{bindings.ListView1.rangeSize}"
first="#{bindings.ListView1.rangeStart}"
// note: I don't have any code added for selectedRow or makeCurrent - assuming this is built-in?
selectionState="#{bindings.ListView1.collectionModel.selectedRow}"
selectionListener="#{bindings.ListView1.collectionModel.makeCurrent}">
<af:column>
<af:commandButton actionListener="#{bindings.Delete.execute}"
text="Remove"
disabled="#{!bindings.Delete.enabled}"/>
</af:column>
---------- corresponding pagedef file ------------
<bindings>.....
<action id="Delete" IterBinding="ListView1Iterator"
InstanceName="SrchDataControl.ListView1"
DataControl="SrchDataControl" RequiresUpdateModel="false"
Action="30"/>
</bindings>
Note: I also tried solution posted on following thread, but again, only first row is deleted, not the selected row?: Delete and Commit
Message was edited by:
javaX

I just want to delete (or remove) it from the VO. Data for this VO is not on the database.
The function is doing what I want it to do (delete from the VO), its just always deleting the first row, versus the selected row. I select the command button next on a column next to an item further down in the list and it deletes the first row. The problem is setting the selected row to be removed - I thought setting the current row would be taken care of by the SelectListener?
selectionState="#{bindings.MyIspListView1.collectionModel.selectedRow}"
selectionListener="#{bindings.MyIspListView1.collectionModel.makeCurrent}"

ADF panel does not prompt for variable defined in ADF view object.

I have created an ADF Panel, which allows the user to run a few simple queries against an Oracle database done using ADF view objects and ADF view links and ADF application module.
One of these queries lookup detail information about a given database object (Table, view or whatever) from dba_objects. The SQL uses a parameter (:P_OBJ_NAME) that has a default value of “Departments”. If I run the ADF application module by itself outside of the ADF panel, all works fine, it prompts me to provide a value for the parameter :P_OBJ_NAME.
As I said the panel contains the different ADF view links including the one that should prompt the user to provide a value for :P_OBJ_NAME. When I run the panel it does not prompt me for :P_OBJ_NAME, it just uses the default defined value “departments”.
I hope I described my problem for every one to understand. The question obviously is how do I get the ADF panel to prompt the user to provide a value for parameter :P_OBJ_NAME, my expectation was that since the sql in the view object and the application module both are designed to prompt for a value for this parameter then the panel should do just that but it does not.
You expert input would be most appreciated.
Thanks.
Bobby A.
Edited by: Babak Akbari on Aug 13, 2009 8:34 AM
Edited by: Babak Akbari on Aug 13, 2009 11:12 AM

The prompting for a parameter is a feature we built into the ADF Tester - it is not a default behavior you get in your application when you just place a VO on your page.
To get something like this expend the operations node under the VO in the data control palette, and drag the "Execute with parameters" operation to your page to drop it as a parameter form.
This will provide your user a place to fill out the parameter and press a button to execute the query.

How can I implement the equivilent of a temporary table with "on commit delete rows"?

hi,
I have triggers on several tables. During a transaction, I need to gather information from all of them, and once one of the triggers has all the information, it creates some data. I Can't rely on the order of the triggers.
In Oracle and DB2, I'm using temporary tables with "ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS" to gather the information - They fit perfectly to the situation since I don't want any information to be passed between different transactions.
In SQL Server, there are local temporary tables and global. Local temp tables don't work for me since apparently they get deleted at the end of the trigger. Global tables keep the data between transactions.
I could use global tables and add some field that identifies the transaction, and in each access to these tables join by this field, but didn't find how to get some unique identifier for the transaction. @@SPID is the session, and sys.dm_tran_current_transaction
is not accessible by the user I'm supposed to work with.
Also with global tables, I can't just wipe data when "operation is done" since at the triggers level I cannot identify when the operation was done, transaction was committed and no other triggers are expected to fire.
Any idea which construct I could use to acheive the above - passing information between different triggers in the same transaction, while keeping the data visible to the current transaction?
(I saw similar questions but didn't see an adequate answer, sorry if posting something that was already asked).
Thanks!

This is the scenario: If changes (CRUD) happen to both TableA and TableB, then log some info to TableC. Logic looks something like this:
Create Trigger TableA_C After Insert on TableA {
If info in temp tables available from TableB
        Write info to TableC
   else
       Write to temp tables info from TableA
Create Trigger TableB_C After Insert on TableB {
If info in temp tables available from TableA
        Write info to TableC
   else
       Write to temp tables info from TableB
So each trigger needs info from the other table, and once everything is available, info to TableC is written. Info is only from the current transaction.
Order of the triggers is not defined. Also there's no gurantee that both triggers would fire - changes can happen only to TableA / B and in that case I don't want to write anything to TableC.
The part that gets and sets info to temp table is implemented as temp tables with "on commit delete rows" in DB2 / Oracle.
What do you think? As I've mentioned, I could use global temp tables with a field that would identify the transaction, but didn't find something like that in SQL Server. And, the lifespan of local temp tables is too short.

Delete Operation in JDBC Sender Adapter not works

Hi,
    I have one student table which contains the fields ID,Name,BirthMonth,BirthYear,ReadFlag fields. ReadFlag is a character field or lenght 1 which contains only values either 'Y' or ' '.
     I want to execute delete operation in this table ie to delete the records which contains the readflag = 'Y'. So, I set the below values for the following parameters.
DELETE FROM student WHERE READFLAG = ' Y '
Query SQL Statement : SELECT * FROM student WHERE readflag = 'Y'
Update SQL Statement : DELETE FROM student WHERE READFLAG = 'Y'
Poll Interval : 60 Seconds.
    There are more records in this table which contains readflag = 'Y'. But, the Adapter does not delete those records from the table i.e delete operation is not executed. At the same time, in Comm. Channel monitoring it does not show any error, but the delete operation is not carried out in the table.
     I tried after 'COMMIT' the table also. But it does not work. What could be the reason ? or How to use Delete Operation effectively on the table ?
     Kindly help me friends to solve this problem.
Thanking you.
Kind Regards,
Jeg.

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/7e/5df96381ec72468a00815dd80f8b63/content.htm >>>
<i>Adapter Work Method
You must add an indicator that specifies the processing status of each data record in the adapter (data record processed/data record not processed) to the database table.
The UPDATE statement must alter exactly those data records that have been selected by the SELECT statement. You can ensure this is the case by using an identical WHERE clause. (See Processing Parameters, SQL Statement for Query, and SQL Statement for Update below).
<b>Processing can only be performed correctly when the isolation level for transaction is set to repeatable_read or serializable.
Example
SQL statement for query: SELECT * FROM table WHERE processed = 0;
SQL statement for update: UPDATE table SET processed = 1 WHERE processed = 0;
processed is the indicator in the database.</b></i>
try with repeatable_read or serializable !!!
Also go thru this thread - DELETE Querey in JDBC SENDER

How can i commit my operation

Hi everyone
I have a code like this
@Stateless(name = "MetadataSessionBean",mappedName="ejb/MetadataSessionBean")
@TransactionManagement(TransactionManagementType.CONTAINER)
public class MetadataSessionBean implements MetadataSession{
@Resource
private SessionContext context;
private EntityManagerFactory fact = null;
private EntityManager mgr = null;
@TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttributeType.REQUIRED)
     public boolean insertTheme(Integer id,String name)
          // TODO Auto-generated method stub
          boolean ret = false;
          InspireDataThemeEB eb = new InspireDataThemeEB();
          eb.setAdi(name);
          eb.setId(id);
          try{
               eb = mgr.merge(eb);
               mgr.persist(eb);
               ret =true;
          catch(Exception ee)
               context.getRollbackOnly();
          finally
               return ret;
There isn't any exception.But my InspireDataThemeEB does not load to database.
And at the web tier
my code is
try {
               Context ctx = new InitialContext();
          MetadataSession sess = (MetadataSession)ctx.lookup("ejb/MetadataSessionBean");
               sess.insertTheme(2, "john");
          } catch (NamingException e) {
How i can i commit this operation?

So the advice I gave in your [earlier thread|http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5428326] was useless?
Suppose an exception does happen, you are catching it and silently rolling back the transaction. You don't e.printStackTrace(); it or log anything.

Oracle.adf.view.rich.newWindowDetect.OPTIONS ADF_FACES-30163

Hi, all!
I have turned flag oracle.adf.view.rich.newWindowDetect.OPTIONS to ON in web.xml
+<context-param>+
+<param-name>oracle.adf.view.rich.newWindowDetect.OPTIONS</param-name>+
+<param-value>on</param-value>+
+</context-param>+
but when I look into the log (after starting server) :
+<Warning> <oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.webapp.rich.RegistrationFilter> <ADF_FACES-30163> <The application is running with the new window detect flag off. It is highly recommended that this flag be turned on to ensure proper functioning of your application when new browser windows are launched. In web.xml set the context parameter oracle.adf.view.rich.newWindowDetect.OPTIONS to 'on'.>>+
Why this situation is possible? Why weblogic doesn't see this param is web.xml?

in sample application the issue is not reproducible .Therefore ,try to delete the web.xml file and clean all the application and again create one more web.xml file and copy the contents of earlier web.xml.
Hope it will work as expected manner.
Regards,
Hoque

Oracle.adf.view.rich.pprNavigation.OPTIONS on give problem with servlets

I recentrly fix ADF_FACES-60058 using in web.xml:
<context-param>
<param-name>oracle.adf.view.rich.newWindowDetect.OPTIONS</param-name>
<param-value>on</param-value>
</context-param>
and now bc this change, when i call a sevlet using ajax.. all my servlets stop working...
=( This mean this is not good fix...

Hi i am getting now after fix problem with my servlet( Delete servlet and use Backing bean instead)
javax.servlet.ServletException: java.lang.InternalError: name is too long to represent
at weblogic.servlet.internal.RequestDispatcherImpl.forward(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:266)
at com.sun.faces.context.ExternalContextImpl.dispatch(ExternalContextImpl.java:410)
at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.context.ExternalContextDecorator.dispatch(ExternalContextDecorator.java:44)
at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.context.ExternalContextDecorator.dispatch(ExternalContextDecorator.java:44)
at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.context.ExternalContextDecorator.dispatch(ExternalContextDecorator.java:44)
at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.context.ExternalContextDecorator.dispatch(ExternalContextDecorator.java:44)
at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.context.FacesContextFactoryImpl$OverrideDispatch.dispatch(FacesContextFactoryImpl.java:267)
at com.sun.faces.application.ViewHandlerImpl.executePageToBuildView(ViewHandlerImpl.java:473)
at com.sun.faces.application.ViewHandlerImpl.renderView(ViewHandlerImpl.java:141)
at javax.faces.application.ViewHandlerWrapper.renderView(ViewHandlerWrapper.java:189)
at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.ViewHandlerImpl.renderView(ViewHandlerImpl.java:193)
at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl._renderResponse(LifecycleImpl.java:685)
at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl._executePhase(LifecycleImpl.java:261)
=/

ADF view : auto commit delete operation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for