Adobe webdynpro taking time too long

Hi,
Initially, I have Read Timed Out issue. I;ve incresed the Web Container timeout to 360 seconds. but now, when I run the program with Interavtive form, it tooks very long time. It's been 30 minutes and still going. I do see the log mentioned not found ServiceContext, Any idea what's wrong?
[code]org.omg.CORBA.BAD_PARAM: Not found ServiceContext with id=0 vmcid: OMG minor code: 26 completed: Maybe
     at com.sap.engine.services.iiop.internal.giop.ClientRequest.get_reply_service_context(ClientRequest.java:284)
     at com.sap.engine.services.ts.jts.ots.PortableInterceptor.ClientJTSInterceptor.receive_reply(ClientJTSInterceptor.java:91)
     at com.sap.engine.services.iiop.internal.giop.ClientRequest.dealReceiveReply(ClientRequest.java:133)
     at com.sap.engine.services.iiop.internal.giop.ClientRequest.dealReceiveReply(ClientRequest.java:125)
     at com.sap.engine.services.iiop.server.portable.Delegate.invoke(Delegate.java:282)
     at org.omg.CORBA.portable.ObjectImpl._invoke(ObjectImpl.java:457)
     at com.adobe.service._FontManagerStub.getAdobeServerFontDirectory(_FontManagerStub.java:33)
     at com.adobe.document.XMLFormService.getFontDirectories(Unknown Source)
     at com.adobe.document.XMLFormService.getCommonDir(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
     at com.adobe.service.ProcessResource$ManagerImpl.getConfigPropertyString(ProcessResource.java:1080)
     at com.adobe.service.Manager_Tie.getConfigPropertyString(Manager_Tie.java:55)
     at com.adobe.service._ManagerImplBase._invoke(_ManagerImplBase.java:101)
     at com.sap.engine.services.iiop.internal.InvokeHandlerHolder.invoke(InvokeHandlerHolder.java:35)
     at com.sap.engine.services.iiop.internal.giop.IncomingRequest.process(IncomingRequest.java:244)
     at com.sap.engine.services.iiop.internal.giop.ConnectionParser.readMessage(ConnectionParser.java:85)
     at com.sap.engine.services.iiop.server.CommunicationLayerImpl.request(CommunicationLayerImpl.java:209)
     at com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process(ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:33)
     at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
     at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:100)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:170)[/code]

OK. I found the problem. In one of the java parameters in the installation guide, It mentioned to add:
-Dorg.omg.PortableInterceptor.ORBInitializerClass.com.sap.engine.services.ts.jts.ots.PortableInterceptor.JTSInitializer
Well, looking at the rest of the parameter for -Dorg..Class, it always followed by '=', so I change into:
-Dorg.omg.PortableInterceptor.ORBInitializerClass=com.sap.engine.services.ts.jts.ots.PortableInterceptor.JTSInitializer
And now it is working just fine.

Similar Messages

Installing OS X on a new hard drive taking way too long?

I switched out my old 250 GB hard drive that shipped with my MacBook Pro for a new 640 GB WesternDigit drive. I'm trying to use a Mavericks installer USB to install on my newly formatted hard drive, but it's taking way too long - I mean, I left it going overnight (about 7.5 hours), and when I came down, it wasn't even half done. Is there anything I can do here? I'd like to use my laptop. Thank you very much for any suggestions.

Do you have a internet connection? Even with a USB installer that if good and functioning properly you need an internet connection to Authenticate the install with your Apple ID.
If your old drive is still functioning you can connect it to your Mac with a SATA to USB adapter and use the Recovery HD on that original drive to reinstall Mavericks on the new drive.
If the drive is no longer functioning and you have no way of getting to the Apple internet download for Mavericks then you will need to start with an install of the original version of OS X that came on your Mac when new then update and or upgrade to Snow Leopard 10.6.8 and then use the Mac App Store to reinstall Mavericks. There is not other way to do this. So save yourself some time and trouble and start fresh.
If your original drive is still functioning and it had Mavericks installed on it you can also CLONE that drive to the new one once you connect it to your mac with some type of SATA to USB adapter or enclosure.
If the Mavericks USB installer you have was made from a Mac that came with Mavericks pre-installed on it that will not work on your Mac.

Compressor 3 taking far too long to compress H.264

Origianally posted this here:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=7328851&#7328851
But thought I would start a new topic.
Something is very wrong. I sent a 9 minute MPEG-2 file to Compressor to have compressed to H.264. (H.264 compression is what I would gather many of us are using Comp for in the first place).
I know Compressor can do H.264 comp at about 1.43:1 from tests. So a 9 minute clip should take, 6 minutes or so, and with Q Master it should be even faster. Well, Comp reports 8-9 hours. What the heck is going on.
I have taken MPEG Stream Clip and done the same H.264 output and it takes about 6-7 minutes. Something is up with Comp 3.
Now I have turned off Q Master, Reset the Comp 3 BG Processing, Quit Comp and relaunch, maybe reboot, possibly trash all prefs related to Comp.
And still 8-9 hours?
A 9 minute clip should take 6 minutes and as I say, with Q Master, even faster, that is the point of Q Q Master services
Message was edited by: macguitarman

Took me awhile to get Compressor going reliably but now it has been pretty solid.
I am not sure what settings you are using to encode (for instance Frame Controls can add alot of time), but 8-9 hours for 9 Minutes seems rather extreme. Note though that you are using an MPEG-2 (m2v?) file. You may be better off converting to another Codec or better yet go to the source material you are double encoding.
I just set up a Compressor setting on an Octo 2.8 with everything pushed to the Max on Frame Controls and set to resize a 6 Minute HD AIC stream down to H.264 @25% of the size of the original and sent out to "This Computer" and not the Cluster and it took 17 minutes or so. Even with converting from m2v it does seem like it is taking way too long on the machine for you.
I saw you had done some troubleshooting, but do you have any other details? Was his a clean install of the OS and Studio, or were there upgrades along the way? That caused some issues in the past - meaning between upgrades to Leopard and/or installing Studio 2 over Studio 1.

It's taking way too long for my messages to load.

Starting on Tuesday this week (10/14) it is taking way too long for my messages to load from my Gmail account. Once the message finally shows up in the Inbox, it's taking up to 10-15 min for the message to load where I can actually view the message. I'm going to have to move to another email application if this can't be resolved which is very unfortunate as I've enjoyed using Thunderbird up until now.

I guess I'm at least happy to know it's not just me. I've had to abandon Thunderbird for now. I guess I'll keep an eye out for future updates.

Firefox is taking way too long to load pages. I have a very fast internet connection but firefox takes forever to load websites. At first it worked fine and very fast but now very slow??

firefox is taking way too long to load pages. I have a very fast internet connection but firefox takes forever to load websites. At first it worked fine and very fast but now very slow??

Hi there!
do you test other browsers?
i suggest to make a clean install of newer version of Firefox like v8.0.

Average processing time too long in workload monitoring (ST03N)

Hi expert,
I wander why average processing time too long in workload monitoring (ST03N)
for example
avg.response time : 4700 (ms)
avg.processing time : 4200 (ms)
avg.CPU time : 300 (ms)
avg.DB time : 200(ms)
OS (CPU and memory ) status is nomal.
please tell me why processing time too long and what do I check more.
thanks

Hi
Processing Time is the total time taken i.e. Time when user clicks on submit button to send data to SAP System till the time SAP System processes everything and shows the updated screen back to the user. It includes Network Time also.
Average Processing Time is the Processing Time per Dialog Step
In ST03N workload Monitor, there are different Task Type like Dialog, Background, RFC, Update,..........
Could you be more specific where do you find the Average Processing Time high ? I mean for which Task Type.
If you have users complaining for Performance problem check their Network Time also.
Let us know, if this information was helpful to you.
with regards,
Parin Hariyani

Message processing taking a too long time

Hi,
I'm sending messages for a external party and a few days ago these messages are getting too long time do process.
Any idea where i can analyse ?
Regards,
Gustavo

Hi Prado,
Request you to check the statistics for few days in Performance monitoring and analyse if the messages are taking long time only for this interface or it is happening for other interfaces as well.
check below link for performance monitoring
SAP PI 7.1 Performance Monitoring
1. if you are facing the issue with only this interface then you need to check the design and and analyse where and in which step it is taking time.
2. if you are facing issue with other interfaces as well then you need to tune the system..here you might need basis team help.
check below link for performance tuning
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/70c8bdb7-6fe0-2e10-5b86-a33fdb53ffcd?QuickLink=index&…
Regards,
Naveen

Profile WS run time too long

My first test run (in dev) of the custom Java PWS against a SQL server database seems to be taking too long. Its seems to be taking appx. 1 second or more per user. This will be a problem when processing around 20,000 users. We can't have a PWS running for 4-6 hours everynight.
I'd really appreciate any tips to optimize this for faster performance. I am opening DB Connection and running 2 queries for each users and clsoing the statement and connection. Can I do this another way so I open the DB connection(and maybe statement) for the Profile Source only once and release the connection etc. after the whole job is done or in case of errors.
Please help as this could be a huge bottleneck for us!
Thanks.
Vanita
Staples

Hi Akash,
Thanks for your quick reply. Unfortunately I don't have any signature field to limit the profile sync by. I am currently running the PWs in ToMCAT 4.1.30. We plan to deploy on WAS in dev. I am not sure if there is connection pooling being done by Tomcat in 4.1.30 version. Do you have any information on that? I am doing db connect and 2 property queries in the getuserproperties method.
1. Would the connection pooling (if done in WAS) make any difference to the run time?
2. Would opening the connection in initialize() method versus GetUserProperties() make any difference?
As always, thanks for your help.
Vanita
------- Akash Jain wrote on 3/1/05 1:25 PM -------Hi Vanita,On recent hardware, you should be able to perform an initial profile sync at at a rate of ~10/second. This means you should be able to perform your 20k users profile sync in under an hour. Resyncs should be much faster if you use a signature attribute.
I'm going to assume you're hitting some database backend with a table structure like the following:Users Table String UserGUID Date LastModified
Properties Table int PropID String UserGUID String PropValue
You have your users keyed off a unique name - a GUID in this example - and properties in a seperate table keyed off PropID and GUID.
Lets review the protocol and each step:a) initialize() - sends the parameters of the profile sync to the PWS, this is a good place to do a single query to your database in order to cache all user unique names and signatures (LastModified dates) in a HashTable. This will make re-syncs much faster since subsequent AttachToUser() and GetUserSignature() calls will be derived from this HashTable.b) attachToUser() - in this call you can simply lookup your user record against the HashTable created in Initialize(). If no entry is returned, then throw a NoSuchUserException. If a user does exist continue.c) getUserSignature() - again use the HashTable created in Initialize() to lookup the signature for this user. return it as a String.d) getUserProperties() - if called, this means the signature you sent back in step (c) has changed since the last profile sync. you now want to make a call to your properties table (a single DB call) to load all the property values for the user. return these as a UserPropertyInfo object.
During an initital sync, you will always get to step (d) above. During re-syncs, assuming there is low churn, I'd say a max of 1% of your calls will get to step (d) and thus the re-sync should be an order of magnitude faster in most cases.
With respect to database connections - if you are opening and closing a connection for each user, this is pretty poor with respect to performance. Your best bet in Java is to use a single connection (this is a single threaded process) which is setup in initialize(). In the shutdown() method, close this connection.
I hope this helps, the combination of using a single connection, using the signature attribute and caching all the users unique names and signatures in one call at the start of the profile sync should drastically increase performance.
Thanks,Akash

Slideshow Taking WAY too long to load

I have a slideshow posted at
http://olyrents.com/slideshow.htm
My client is saying it takes too long to load, and I am
finding that it is loading all of the photos first before you can
scroll through and view them. It's just not functioning properly.
I wonder if someone could look at the actionscript and give
me any suggestions? Maybe there's something else going on?
I have attached the script from the original fla file.
Thanks!

That adds up to somewhere in the realm of 5MB, which isn't
going to be a quick load time, though it might be visually workable
if you separate the loading from the viewing.
One thing you might consider is doing away with the preloader
visual. With 65 images being interupted by 65 preloader screens, it
kinda defeats the potential aethetics of the images and may lead
one to think it's taking a long time to load them as a result.

Taking way too long to iPhone for iOS 5

Taking too long to sinc iPhone for ios5

What it has to do is install the framworks and then reload all of your data onto the iPhone. It took me 2 hours to install on my iPad but it took 15 min for my iPhone

Download time too long

Why is it taking too long to download a song? Im talking HOURS if it even happens!

Could you download the graphics dynamically as they are required?
So, the air app would be the master 'app' and those additional
graphics are loaded from your server only when required? I'd bet this
would be the way you'd build it if the app were purely based online
and not via air?
Dave Cates
Managing Director
Redemption Media Ltd
www.redemptionmedia.co.uk
Interactive internet, media & communications solutions.
Sent from my iPhone

Elapsed Timer Too Long?

Is there a limit to the duration I can input into an elapsed timer VI? In my program the user can specify a duration of up to 24 hrs. My program is supposed to hold current conditions for the specified durations. When the user sets it 1, 2, 3 or four hours it holds the current conditions fine. When they set it to 24 hours the current conditions are not held for 24 hours. Is this too long of a duration for this VI (86,400 seconds)?
thanks.

rchaoua wrote:
The question regarding maximum duration a elapsed time VI has still not been answered.
You can convert the "elapsed time" express VI to a plain VI by "right-click...open front panel" and inspect the code yourself. There are no secrets! You can see that it converts the timestamp to DBL and operates on the lower precision DBL values. This should be sufficient for much more than 24 hours, so something else is wrong in your case.
Can you attach an example that shows the incorrect behavior (=premature elapsation?).
rchaoua wrote:
But I have another question; Can you have multiple elapsed time VI in a single piece of code and not have it affect the other elapsed VIs? I have three elapsed timers in my code (in different panels) and get the sneaking supsicion that they are not behaving nicely with each other. But I am not sure. I was hoping someone has expereince with this scenario and could shed some light.
The crucial subVIs are reentrant and thus there should be no interaction between multiple instances of the "elapsed time" express VI. Each will keep it's own state. Why do you suspect that they interact?
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

NI7358 Acceleration time too long

Hi all,
First, let me introduces briefly our application for your better understanding before touch the problem.
We're using NI7358 to control 8 servo motors(Mitsubishi HC-KFS13, 100W, 3000RPM, 131072Counts/Rev) for pick and place. The amplifier is also Mitsubishi one MELSERVO-J2M-P8A. From view of NI7358 all 8 axes are open-loop stepper while amplifier will close-loop control the servo motors. One limitation here is this amplifier only can accept 200KPPS pulse rate input, so we set amplifier internal gear ratio to 4096/125 to achieve its maximum speed.
GearRatio=(3000rpm*131072count/60)/(200*1000counts/sec)
Then based on this ratio we can know the resolution of "stepper" in view of NI7358 is 4000RPM. (131072*125/4096)
Now our problem is:
The system requires these motors move in short distance(1200steps for NI7358) in the shortest time. So we want to shorten the acceleration/deceleration time as possible as we can. As we test the same application before using Keyence PLC as pulse generator, it can meet our target so we expect NI also can.
During testing using MAX under 1-D interactive, when I set Velocity=3000rpm, Accel/Decel=20000rps/s, target=1200steps, I can get the best result around 1040rpm(peak velocity) with Accel/Decel time around 50ms. The time is too long for us. If I set increase Accel/Deceleration to its maximum* NI7358 will stop pulse output at all(don't know why but suspect it's because of short distance)
* Maximum Accel/Deceleration(RPS/s) = Amax X (1/Ts) X (1/Ts) X (1/R) (refer to the description of "flex_load_rpsps")
for our case: Amax=32counts/sample; Ts=0.25ms; R=4000steps/Rev, result is 128000(RPS/s)
Questions:
1. Is Amax=32counts/sample hardware fixed?
2. Any reason can cause NI7358 stop output pulse when I set maximum acceleration/decelration?
3. Does NI provide time-based profile instead of velocity one so we can set acceleration/deceleration time directly?
4. Can I use direct pulse output mode just like a pulse generator instead of current profile output?
5. Under open-loop mode, if I change PID & acceleration feedforward gain, do these will affect the output pulse performance?
6. If we change the control circuit from open-loop stepper to close-loop servo system, does it can solve our problem?
7. How does the trajectory generator produces the count/steps output during the acceleration? I create an excel file(attached below) try to draw out the relationship between the sample, velocity and acceleration, anyone can check for me it's correct or not?
My formula is here:
Position2 = Position1 + Velocity2*(Sample2-Sample1)
Velocity2 = Velocity1 + Acceleration*(Sample2-Sample1)
All comments are appreciated!
Attachments:
Profile Study.xls ‏28 KB

BO has no controls over VPN or network bamdwith, it takes what OS and DB drivers give it.
You'll need to identify at which point of the workflow to refresh the report the slowness is occuring.
You'll need to enable webi tracing and see how long the actual refresh take.
You'll need to enable network traces to see where in the network the slowdown is occuring.

Query taking way too long

Hello,
Can somebody please help.
I am wanting to change this query so that it does not take too long. How can I do it please?
select count(*), t.tel_no, t.prospect_id, a.ACCOUNT_NO, a.account_title
from tel_nos t, account a
where t.tel_type = 'S'
AND t.prospect_id = a.prospect_id
AND SYSDATE BETWEEN t.start_date AND NVL(t.end_date, SYSDATE)
group by t.tel_no, t.prospect_id, a.ACCOUNT_NO, a.account_title
having count(*) > 1
Thanks in advance.

Tuning is a science not a parlour guessing game. It's hard for us to diagnose the problem you have here as you have given us almost no information. For instance, are you using rule based or cost based optimizer? How big are these two tables? What indexes do they have? What percentage of rows are you expecting the query to return?
Tuning is such a big area that it's hard to know where to begin. I suggest you start at the Oracle docs. Chapters 1, 4 and 5 will set you going.
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/A87860_01/doc/server.817/a76992/toc.htm
Having said all that you may well find this runs faster:
SELECT count(*), t.tel_no, t.prospect_id, a.account_no, a.account_title
FROM   account a, tel_nos t
WHERE t.tel_type = 'S'
AND    sysdate BETWEEN t.start_date AND nvl(t.end_date, sysdate)
AND    t.prospect_id = a.prospect_id
GROUP BY t.tel_no, t.prospect_id, a.account_no, a.account_title
HAVING count(*) > 1
/I leave it to you to work out why (it's nothing to do with clearer layout).
Cheers, APC

BUNDLE_EXECUTE TAKING WAY TOO LONG TIME. PLEASE HELP

Hi Experts,
Please see that after we ugrade our SEM 4 to SEM 6 along with BW 3.5 to BI 7, I am performing Post Upgrade Testing in Sandbox.
In this process when I tried executing a Global Planning Sequence in Back Ground by Right Clicking the GPS I wish to run and selected Execute PS in Background Option.
But when I am looking at it's status in Job overview, it is running for ever. I still wonder that how come it is taking so long time and I have no clue.
The same GPS when I tried executing the ssame way in DEV and QA servers where the Upgrade is still not happened it is not taking more than 80 Seconds.
So Kindly guide me through this issue. Highly appreciate your valuble inputs.
Thanks and Regards,
BIP

Hi ,
We are facing the same issue in our new parallel systems (SEM 3.2 to SEM 6 along with BW 3.1 to BI 7). Please let us know how you solved the issue.
Our Planning Sequence has just one copy function.
The same GPS when I tried executing in old systems in SEM 3.2 and BW 3.1, it is working fine.
Any solution?
Thanks,
H

Adobe webdynpro taking time too long

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for