After Insert Trigger Not Working

Hi All,
I am not a guru in writing triggers.
I am inserting new records in a Table FA_BOOKS by application and this inserts records in FA_ADDITIONS_B. This is a vanilla process.
i have written a trigger on FA_ADDITIONS_B, and i want to update the cost from the fa_books to fa_additions_b column attribute21
The trigger i have written is After insert on FA_ADDITIONS_B and i try to select cost from the fa_books for the :new.asset_id.
SELECT COST
INTO v_cost
FROM FA_BOOKS
WHERE ASSET_ID = :NEW.ASSET_ID;
this is always returning no_data_found exception and i do not understand how to update the attribute21 in FA_ADDITIONS_B
Here is a sample of my trigger.
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER update_attribute21_new_asset_1
after INSERT ON fa_ADDITIONS_B
FOR EACH ROW
DECLARE
V_COST NUMBER;
BEGIN
SELECT COST
INTO v_cost
FROM FA_BOOKS
WHERE ASSET_ID = :NEW.ASSET_ID;
update fa_ADDITIONS_B
set attribute21 = v_cost
where ASSET_ID = :NEW.ASSET_ID;
END;
Any help on this will be appreciated.
TX in advance.
Regards,

I still haven't understood the reason why you can't transfer the COST information from FA_BOOKS to FA_ADDITIONS_B in the initial trigger on FA_BOOKS that populates FA_ADDITIONS_B. Or how is the population of FA_ADDITIONS_B accomplished? Is it part of the application code?
Regarding the NO_DATA_FOUND issue:
Is it ensured that populating the FA_ADDITIONS_B table is done in the same transaction as the FA_BOOKS inserts or that the FA_BOOKS transaction is committed?
Why do you need that additional trigger?
My assumption is that you're in a trigger "chain" - if I get your approach correctly - you're basically attempting to query FA_BOOKS in a trigger on FA_ADDITIONS_B that in turn has been triggered by a trigger on FA_BOOKS which gets us back to the "mutating" trigger issue. You can't read a table that is currently in the process of being modified.
Or even worse: The (potential) trigger on FA_BOOKS that populates FA_ADDITIONS_B uses "autonomous transaction" and therefore the trigger on FA_ADDITIONS_B can't see the changes of the original transaction.
As already mentioned: Be very careful with "autonomous transactions" in general. There are only a few cases where these are actually useful (e.g. logging purposes), but Tom Kyte has written numerous articles why triggers and in particular autonomous transactions are mostly evil.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

Similar Messages

Mutating table exception on trigger with After Insert but not with before

Hi
I need to maintain some constraint on the table to have only one row for values of the columns but not by primary key constraint.
Because in case of primary key the insert would fail and the rest of the operation would be discontinued, I cannot change in the somponent that inserts the row so I have to prevent that on the table I have.
I created a before insert trigger on the table which checks if any row exists in the table with same column values as the one being inserted. if found I delete the rows and let the insert happen (w/o raising any error). if the rows do not exist then the insert shall be continued.
I read at place that modifying the dame table in the trigger body shall raise a mutating table exception, but I donot get the exception when the trigger is fired.
Just when I change the trigger to after insert trigger then the nutating table exception is thrown.
Is it the right behavior i.e. the Before insert trigger does not raise the exception and only after insert does that, since I could not find the example for before insert triggers throwing such exception so I think it is better to confirm it before finalizing the implementation.
Thanks
Sapan

sapan wrote:
Hi Tubby
I cannot user unique constraint because that would raise an exception upon violation and the third party component that is inserting in the table would fail.
That component does some other tasks as well after this insert and if an exception is raised then those tasks would not be performed.
Also I cannot change the component to ignore this exception.Well then, you're in a bit of a pickle.
I'm guessing the trigger you have been working on isn't "safe". By that i mean that it doesn't account for multi-user scenarios. You'll need to serialize access to the data elements in question and implement some sort of locking mechanism to ensure that only 1 session can work with those values.
After you work out how to do that it sounds as though you would be better served using an INSTEAD OF trigger (you'd need to implement this on a view which is made off of your base table).
Here's one way you can work on serializing access to your table on a relatively fine grained level (as opposed to locking the entire table).
Re: possible to lock stored procedure so only one session may run it at a time?
Cheers,

Before or After insert trigger on HR_API_TRANSACTION_VALUES

I am on the termination page of SSHR and after entering the details when clcked on 'Next' the validations built in before / after insert trigger of HR_API_TRANSACTION_VALUES does not retrieve the data and the error 'No data found' is displayed.
We do not have AME approval. When clicked on 'Next' it goes to the review page. When I do a select on the HR_API_TRANSACTION_VALUES the data do exists but the validation does not work.
We have Oracle HRMS 11i with database as 11g.
Please give a resolution at the earliest.

you can use
hr_transaction_api.set_varchar2_value
or
hr_transaction_api.set_number_value
based on what type of value that you want to update

After Insert Trigger with DML on the subject table?

I am trying to set up e-mail notifications, so I created a procedure, which accepts the argument of an id. In the procedure, it queries the table and sends out mail based on the result set. (in the trigger, I pass in the value of :NEW.id). The procedure then queries the table for that row id.
First, for the after update I was getting the error:
ORA-04091: table is mutating, trigger/function may not see it ORA-06512
So, I was advised to do in the declare block: pragma autonomous_transaction; I did that, and that solved the problem there. SO I did the same in the after insert trigger, but then I get the error:
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource ORA-06512
I asked our DBA and he said you are not able to query the table of which the trigger is a subject of. I thought it would be possible since its After insert or update?
Can anyone offer any suggestions ? :)
Thanks,
Trent

Any reason why it would work in an after update trigger then?
So, I was advised to do in the declare block: pragma autonomous_transaction; I did that, and that solved the problem therePRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION "bends" the restriction against SQL against base table.
It is the equivalent to tap dancing across a mine field.
You might get the desired results most of the time or you might get a tasty surprise when you least expect it.
What happens to your application in the future, if/when the UPDATE has a ROLLBACK issued & PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION has successfully completed?
Inquiring minds would like to know the answer.

After insert trigger

Dears,
In after insert trigger implementation if the base table failed due to some errors.
Is it possible to still have records inserted in the log table inside the trigger
Thanks
Janani.C

What you want is to write log records to a table, regardless of whether the transaction they're logging fails. This would make sense for inevstigating errors,e tc. This is the only time when it is acceptable to use autonomous transactions.
Encapsulate your logguing code in a separate procedure which has the {font:courier new}PRAGMA autonomous_transaction{font} in its declaration, and include a commit. Such a procedure works in its own separate tranasction - a separate session in fact - and write the log record without affecting the broader transaction. [url http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14261/sqloperations.htm#sthref1515]Find out more.
Cheers, APC
P.S. I agree with Hoek that you should investigate teh LOG ERRORS INTO functionality, as it can be very useful, especially with bulk processes. However, it can only store information directly relating to the rejected records, which might not be sufficient for your purposes.

Update working, but insert is not working.

Hi friends,
Im creating a process for the manular tabular form, that im developing.
Since for the update im giving the below query
for i in 1..htmldb_application.g_f01.count
loop
if htmldb_application.g_f01(i) is not null then
    update gen_req_items
    set item_id = replace(htmldb_application.g_f03(i),'%'||'null%',NULL),
       item_uom_id= replace(htmldb_application.g_f04(i),'%'||'null%',null)
      where req_itm_id = htmldb_application.g_f01(i);
end if;
end loop;It is working fine, and i can able to update the rows in my tabular form.
For insert im giving the following query.
for i in 1..htmldb_application.g_f01.count
loop
if htmldb_application.g_f01(i) is not null then
    update gen_req_items
    set item_id = replace(htmldb_application.g_f03(i),'%'||'null%',NULL),
       item_uom_id= replace(htmldb_application.g_f04(i),'%'||'null%',null)
      where req_itm_id = htmldb_application.g_f01(i);
else if
if htmldb_application.g_f01(i) is null
insert into gen_req_items(barcode, item_id, item_uom_id)
values(htmldb_application.g_f02(i),replace(htmldb_application.g_f03(i),'%'||'null%',NULL),replace(htmldb_application.g_f04(i),'%'||'null%',NULL));
end if;
end if;
end loop;But the insert is not working, as i couldnt able to insert the values. I dont know what went wrong.
The below is my region source coding of my tabular form.
select x.req_itm_id,
x.barcode,
x.item_id,
x.item_uom_id
from (
select htmldb_item.text(1,req_itm_id) req_itm_id,
htmldb_item.select_list_from_query(2,barcode,'select distinct barcode, barcode from gen_req_items') barcode,
htmldb_item.text(3,item_id,10) item_id,
htmldb_item.text(4,item_uom_id,10) item_uom_id
from gen_req_items
union all
select htmldb_item.hidden(1,null) req_itm_id,
htmldb_item.select_list_from_query(2,null,'select distinct barcode, barcode from gen_req_items') barcode,
htmldb_item.text(3,null,10) item_id,
htmldb_item.text(4,null,10) item_uom_id
from dual) xIm developing a manular tabular form by referring the below link, FYR
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/apex/tabular-form-090805.html_
what might be wrong with my insert statement.
As i also created sequence and trigger for my primary key column req_itm_id in tabular form
Brgds,
Mini

Mini wrote:
But the insert is not working, as i couldnt able to insert the values. I dont know what went wrong.
You've posted here often enough to know that this isn't really sufficient detail. Regarding the above statement, how did you reach that particular conclusion? It might sound like a stupid question, but it gives us a bit of insight into how you have attempted to diagnose the problem and can speed up its resolution.
* Does the insert work "standalone" i.e. if you write it as a manual query in, for example, the SQL Window, using bind variables?
* If it does, do you have any special constraints on one or more of the relevant fields (e.g. "not null" on the barcode field)?
* If so, have you ensured that the relevant field(s) (e.g. F02) are actually populated with values and are valid for insertion?
In addition, I'm not sure what the purpose of the nested "If" statement is
if htmldb_application.g_f01(i) is null
end if;Indeed, the else if won't work either... the correct syntax is elsif

Calling of Stored Procedure in After Insert Trigger

Can I call a Stored Procedure in After Insert Trigger ?
Please send a sample code (good example) of After Insert Trigger.
Thanks.

Kishore,
I have two table WLCS_ORDER, WLCS_ORDER_LINE
WLCS_ORDER - It holds order header information like
ORDER_ID
CUSTOMER_ID
TRANSACTION_ID
STATUS
ORDER_DATE
SHIPPING_METHOD
SHIPPING_AMOUNT
SHIPPING_CURRENCY
PRICE_AMOUNT
PRICE_CURRENCY
SHIPPING_GEOCODE
SHIPPING_STREET1
SHIPPING_STREET2
SHIPPING_CITY
SHIPPING_STATE
SHIPPING_COUNTRY
SHIPPING_POBOX
SHIPPING_COUNTY
SHIPPING_POSTAL_CODE
SHIPPING_POSTAL_CODE_TYPE
SPECIAL_INSTRUCTIONS
SPLITTING_PREFERENCE
ORDER_SUBTOTAL
WLCS_ORDER_LINE - It holds all order lines information like
ORDER_LINE_ID
QUANTITY
PRODUCT_ID
TAX_AMOUNT
TAX_CURRENCY
SHIPPING_AMOUNT
SHIPPING_CURRENCY
UNIT_PRICE_AMOUNT
UNIT_PRICE_CURRENCY
MSRP_AMOUNT
MSRP_CURRENCY
DESCRIPTION
ORDER_ID
TOTAL_LINE_AMOUNT
Relation between WLCS_ORDER, WLCS_ORDER_LINE is one to many.
For each WLCS_ORDER row, one or more order lines will insert into WLCS_ORDER_LINE table.
For each new row in WLCS_ORDER table, I have to update the following columns in both the tables with my maths.
WLCS_ORDER
shipping_amount
price_amount
order_subtotal
WLCS_ORDER_LINE
shipping_amount
I thought I can do this in after insert trigger, But if it is not possible, Please give the best way to fulfill this requirement.
I appreciate your help.
Have a great day.
Srinivas

After Insert Trigger - IF-THEN-ELSE

Is it possible to put an if-then-else statement in an after insert trigger with an update to a second table?
CREATE OR REPLACE trigger bev_trg
after insert
on bev
for each row
DECLARE
MEINS VARCHAR2(3);
SPART VARCHAR2(2);
FKIMG NUMBER(22);
SHKZG CHAR(1);
BEGIN
insert into bev2
(vbeln,
posnr)
values
(:new.vbeln,
:new.posnr
IF FKIMG = '10' and MEINS = 'EA'
THEN
     update bev2 set bwsie = (fkimg * '12.17') ;
ELSIF
FKIMG = '12' and MEINS = 'EA'
THEN
     update bev2 set bwsie = (fkimg * '19.02');
ELSIF
SHKZG = 'X'
THEN
     update bev2 set bwsie = (fkimg * '-1');
ELSE
     update bev2 set bwsie = '0' ;
END IF;
update bev2 set bwfkimg = (fkimg * '-1') where SHKZG = 'X';
end;
This does not do the updates.
Thanks
Bev

My original problem is this: I need to create a table
derived from data in another table
and change it to be the conditional data in the update statements.
create table bev(
VBELN VARCHAR2(10),
POSNR VARCHAR2(6),
MEINS VARCHAR2(3),
SPART VARCHAR2(2),
FKIMG NUMBER(22),
SHKZG CHAR(1),
BWSIE NUMBER(9,2),
BWFKIMG NUMBER(22)
update bev set bwsie = (fkimg * '12.17') where SPART = '10' and meins = 'EA' ;
update bev set bwsie = (fkimg * '19.02') where SPART = '12' and meins = 'EA';
update bev set bwsie = (fkimg * '27.39') where SPART = '15' and meins = 'EA';
update bev set bwsie = (fkimg * '48.69') where SPART = '20' and meins = 'EA';
update bev set bwsie = (fkimg * '109.56') where SPART = '30' and meins = 'EA';
update bev set bwsie = '0' where meins = 'EA' and SPART not in('10','12','15','20','30');
update bev set bwsie = (fkimg * '-1') where SHKZG = 'X';
update bev set bwfkimg = (fkimg * '-1') where SHKZG = 'X';
This did not produce the required results so I thought I would try
creating a second table
and using a trigger with if-then-else to update it.
Can't use the trigger on the
original table because it mutates.
create table bev2(
VBELN VARCHAR2(10),
POSNR VARCHAR2(6),
BWSIE NUMBER(9,2),
BWFKIMG NUMBER(22)
insert into bev select vbeln, posnr, meins, spart, fkimg , shkzg, '', ''
from [email protected]
where vbeln = '0090043834' and posnr = '000011'
insert into bev select vbeln, posnr, meins, spart, fkimg , shkzg, '', ''
from [email protected]
where vbeln = '0090043833' and posnr = '000011'
CREATE OR REPLACE trigger bev_trg
after insert
on bev
for each row
DECLARE
MEINS VARCHAR2(3);
SPART VARCHAR2(2);
FKIMG NUMBER(22);
BEGIN
insert into bev2
(vbeln,
posnr,
fkimg
values
(:new.vbeln,
:new.posnr,
:new.fkimg
IF :new.FKIMG = '10' and :new.MEINS = 'EA'
THEN
update bev2 set bwsie = (:new.fkimg * '12.17') ;
ELSIF
:new.FKIMG = '12' and :new.MEINS = 'EA'
THEN
update bev2 set bwsie = (:new.fkimg * '19.02');
ELSIF
:new.FKIMG = '15' and :new.MEINS = 'EA'
THEN
update bev2 set bwsie = (:new.fkimg * '27.39');
ELSIF
:new.FKIMG = '20' and :new.MEINS = 'EA'
THEN
update bev2 set bwsie = (:new.fkimg * '48.69');
ELSIF
:new.FKIMG = '30' and :new.MEINS = 'EA'
THEN
update bev2 set bwsie = (:new.fkimg * '109.56');
ELSIF
SHKZG = 'X'
THEN
update bev2 set bwsie = (:new.fkimg * '-1');
ELSE
update bev2 set bwsie = '0' ;
END IF;
update bev2 set bwfkimg = (:new.fkimg * '-1') where SHKZG = 'X';
end;

After insert trigger issue

Hi All,
Can I have an after insert trigger on a table wherein the execution is also on the same table?
It's like 10 columns in the table A.
During a new row insertion, except one specific column(say 'J'), remaining all getting data.
Now 'after insert', need to update the data of the column J based on one inserted value for column say ID.
Code goes like below:
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER UPDATE_J
AFTER INSERT ON A REFERENCING NEW AS NEW OLD AS OLD
FOR EACH ROW
begin
if :new.ID = 'N%' then
     :new.J:= 'N';
else
     :new.J:= 'M';
end if;
end;
Below is the error when I tried to execute that.
ORA-04091: table string.string is mutating, trigger/function may not see it
Cause: A trigger (or a user defined plsql function that is referenced in this statement) attempted to look at (or modify) a table that was in the middle of being modified by the statement which fired it.
Action: Rewrite the trigger (or function) so it does not read that table.
Any idea to resolve?
Regards,
Seetharaman.

Hi,
The docs say
Restrictions on AFTER
      An AFTER row trigger or AFTER row section of a compound trigger can only read but not write into the :OLD or :NEW fields. When faced with problems like this, it is always a good thing to consult the documentation.
Regards
Peter

Update by after insert trigger

I need to update each new inserted row of data by checking if there were same values in the table. So I tried the After Insert Trigger with the code below :
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER approve_checker
after insert on TBL_BILL
for each row
declare
counter integer;
begin
SELECT COUNT() INTO counter FROM TBL_BILL WHERE issue_date=:NEW.issue_date AND wagon_no=:NEW.wagon_no ;*
IF( counter > 1)
THEN
UPDATE TBL_BILL SET approved = 2 WHERE id = :NEW.id;
END IF;
end approve_checker;
But errors accured :
ORA-04091: table RAIL.BILL is mutating, trigger/function may not see it
ORA-06512: at "RAIL.APPROVE_CHECKER", line 4
ORA-04088: error during execution of trigger 'RAIL.APPROVE_CHECKER'
Any help appreciated.

You cannot SELECT from the table on which the row-level trigger is defined, nor can you UPDATE a table on which the row-level trigger is defined. If you are inserting multiple rows in a single INSERT statement, Oracle can't be sure what rows to update and/or select.
Is there a reason that you wouldn't just create a unique constraint to enforce this condition?
Justin

Using Database Change Notification instead of After Insert Trigger

Hello guys! I have an after insert trigger that calls a procedure, which in turn is doing an update or insert on another table. Due to mutating table errors I declared the trigger and procedure as autonomously transactional. The problem is, that old values of my main tables are inserted into the subtable since the after insert/update trigger is fired before the commit.
My question is how can I solve that and how could I use the change notification package to call my procedure? I now that this notification is only started after a DML/DDL action has been commited on a table.
If you could show me how to carry out the following code with a Database Change Notification I'd be delighted. Furthermore I need to know if it suffices to set up this notification only once or for each client seperately?
Many thanks for your help and expertise!
Regards,
Sebastian
declare
cnumber number (6);
begin
select count(*) into cnumber from (
select case when (select date_datum
    from
      (select f.date_datum,
        row_number() over (order by f.objectid desc) rn
      from borki.fangzahlen f
      where lng_falle      = :new.lng_falle
      and int_fallennummer = :new.int_fallennummer
      and lng_schaedling   = :new.lng_schaedling
      and date_datum       > '31.03.2010'
    where rn=1) < (select date_datum
    from
      (select f.date_datum,
        row_number() over (order by f.objectid desc) rn
      from borki.fangzahlen f
      where lng_falle      = :new.lng_falle
      and int_fallennummer = :new.int_fallennummer
      and lng_schaedling   = :new.lng_schaedling
      and date_datum       > '31.03.2010'
    where rn=2) then 1 end as action from borki.fangzahlen
        where lng_falle      = :new.lng_falle
        and int_fallennummer = :new.int_fallennummer
        and lng_schaedling   = :new.lng_schaedling
        and date_datum       > '31.03.2010') where action = 1;
if cnumber != 0 then
delete from borki.tbl_test where lng_falle = :new.lng_falle
and int_fallennummer = :new.int_fallennummer
and lng_schaedling   = :new.lng_schaedling
and date_datum       > '31.03.2010';
commit;
pr_fangzahlen_tw_sync_sk(:new.lng_falle, :new.int_fallennummer, :new.lng_schaedling);

It looks like you have an error in line 37 of your code. Once you fix that the problem should be resolved.

Error in after insert trigger

Hello all,
I have a question about after insert trigger. Will be new row inserted and commited if after insert trigger returns error? Thank you.
regards,
Miha

What is the error that u r facing?
there could multiple reasons for that. Basically, u can't put commit in the trigger (unless it is an autonomous transaction). Share the pseudo-code of u r triiger, so that , problem can be identified.
Cheers,
Ram Kanala

SM36/37: Specification "After Job" does not work for Daily "periodcity"

I reviewed http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/20/2d513897110872e10000009b38f889/content.htm, which states what I am trying to do should work, but it does not.
Here's the deal:
1. I have two jobs: "A" and "B".
2. "A" runs Daily.
3. I set-up job "B" to run "After job" "A" in my SM36 definition.
Job "B" will run the next day, but never runs again after that even though job "A" continues to run "Daily" as it should.
Further info:
1. We have "Event-triggered" jobs that run fine, but the "After Job" designation doesn't seem to work ongoingly.
2. I can review both jobs "A" and "B" for any "Predecessor" or "Successor" jobs, and, the first jobs to run after the initial set-up DO reference each other (in other words, let's say I schedule job "B" to run "After job" "A" on Tuesday. After Tuesday's run, Job "A" sees job "B" as it's "Successor" job and job "B" sees job "A" as it's "Predecessor" job), but the definition doesn't last into the next day ONLY FOR JOB "B" (as I mentioned, job "A" always runs fine).
3. I can't set the "periodcity" for job "B" because, once I flag it to run "After Job" "A", the "period" options disappear.
4. One final tidbit: the variant for job "B" has a "key date" specified so the date is dynamic for each day the job runs. I can set up job "B" to run "Daily" with this variant and it runs fine, but I wanted it to run AFTER job "A" so it never runs if job "A" doesn't run. (At this point, it's becoming a matter of principal!)
Here's my question:
Why won't job "B" continue to run "Daily" after job "A" (a "Daily" job) runs?
Thanks in advance,
Lara

Please close this thread since you posted the same question here:
[SM36/37: Specification "After Job" does not work for Daily "periodcity"|SM36/37: Specification "After Job" does not work for Daily "periodcity";

I bought the production premium , cs6 , and I download it and registered with out any problem , I formatted my computer then I downloaded the collection , now everything else working only after effect is not working , what shall i do

I bought the production premium , cs6 , and I download it and registered with out any problem , I formatted my computer then I downloaded the collection , now everything else working only after effect is not working , what shall i do

did ae install without problem? check the install logs to be sure (Troubleshoot with install logs | CS5, CS5.5, CS6, CC)
if it did, what do you see when clicking the executable?

Anlysis authorization implemented after Cascading is not working

Anysis authorization implemented after Cascading is not working.
Example: i have 3 dropdownboxes in WAD . Frist dropdownbox State, second dropdownbox District, third dropdownbox Town.In the first dropdown box i selected state AP ,it should show only districts in AP in the second dropdownbox.
But it is not showingin the second dropdownbox.
Please help me

Hi Priya,
The issue may be due to the SQL Reporting Services maximum number of parameter items. We can try to add following code to Web.config file to resolve the issue.
<appSettings>
<add key="aspnet:MaxHttpCollectionKeys" value="30000" />
<add key="aspnet:MaxJsonDeserializerMembers" value="30000" />
</appSettings>
(Note: We can according to our requirement to set these values. After that, restart all SQL Server services. )
By default, the Web.config file is located in:
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSRS10_50.MSSQLSERVER\Reporting Services\ReportManager
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSRS10_50.MSSQLSERVER\Reporting Services\ReportServer
More detail information, you can refer to the article about SQL Reporting Services maximum number of parameter items.
http://sqlsrv4living.blogspot.in/2012/10/sql-reporting-services-maximum-number.html
Regards,
Alisa Tang
Alisa Tang
TechNet Community Support

After Insert Trigger Not Working

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for