Aggregation at hierarchy node

I have following data in the cube.
Material     qty
M1          20
M2          30
M3          -20
M4              50
And Master data - Material Hierarchy is
Material Hierarchy
Mgrp 1
  M1
  M2
  M3
  M4
I need to display only quantities with positive numbers, ie records 1, 2 and 4.
So the report should look like
Mgrp 1   100
  M1     20
  M2     30
  M4     50
If I use the condition I get following result
Mgrp 1   80
  M1     20
  M2     30
  M4     50
PLease suggest a way to get the desired results.
Thanks

your expected behaviour works for me (BW30B SP26).
Furthermore, the system doesn't allow me to calculate results as summation for a hierarchy.
The settings of 0MATL_GROUP:
Hierarchy: active.
Suppress result rows: never.
The hierarchy attributes settings (RSD1):
none of the check boxes are marked
Root/Total Item appears above.
In the QDesigner the hierarchy is not activated, I activate it directly form the Web reporting.
The Keyfig as nothing special, calculation = "nothing defined"
Condition: I tried with all characteristic in the drilldown as well as with selected (0MATL_GROUP). Qty > value.
It works just fine: I get the total amount without condition in the result.
Please let me know what do you have on your side....
Olivier.

Similar Messages

  • Exception (Aggregation) in Hierarchy nodes results

    Hi All,
    We have a requirement to sum all values (as results in hierarchy levels) based on the value of a specific characteristics. example as below is what we want to achieve. Country, Product group, materials are all characteristics and this is viewed as hierarchy in the query. In each material there is a calculation components that will shown the value of Sales Qty, Price/unit and Amount. What we want is to sum up ONLY the Amount value and presented in the hierarchy nodes so that we can see how much sales we did by product group and subsequently by country as whole. If we drill across we will be able to achieve this but we want to drill down as we have the time characteristics and variances at the columns. and no, we do not want user to drill across the calculation components. This query is used in Integrated Planning for planning purposes integrated with BO and that is the structure of the planning layout we want. "Calculation component" is a infoobject that contains 'sales qty', 'price/unit' and 'sales amount' as master data values. 
    I have tried exception aggregation on calc component infoobject for 'LAST VALUE'. and it did capture only the Sales Amount value as result for node Calc Components. But the other results node State, country and Region also takes LAST VALUE.. which is not what i want. what i want is esseentially summation of all Sales amount for each calculation components by state, country and region.
                                                       Last Year  |  Variance   | Current Year |   Jan | Feb | Mar |......
    Region X                                              200  (sum of all country's sales amount)
    ->Country A                                          200  (sum of all states' sales amount) 
       -> State Y1                                          80 (sum of all components's sales amount)
           ->Calc Components Z1                    30
              - Sales Qty                                   10
              - Price/Unit                                     3
              - Sales Amount                             30
          ->Calc Components Z2                    50
              - Sales Qty                                     5 
              - Price/Unit                                   10
              - Sales Amount                             50
       -> State Y2                                        120
           ->Calc Components Z1                   40
              - Sales Qty                                   10
              - Price/Unit                                     4
              - Sales Amount                             40
          ->Calc Components Z2                    80
              - Sales Qty                                   10 
              - Price/Unit                                     8
              - Sales Amount                             80
    any help would be appreciated...
    eddie

    Please try the below steps and I hope it should work for you.
    Instead of calculated keyfigures,try to use local formula .Because i think sometimes CKF will not give the expected result if you use exception aggregation (not sure though,but i used only local formulas)
    1. Create a first local keyfigure (Say F1)for the calculation and use exception aggreagation as 'Average' and reference characteristics as 'PDU'.
    2. Create  a second keyfigure ( Say F2) using the first keyfigure(F1) and use exception aggregation as 'Average' and reference characteristics as 'Sales Document', if you need the values based on average of the sales documents and hide the first keyfigure(F1)
    I consider Sales document is the first level and PDU is the second level ( i mean lowest  level) . Because you need to consider these sequencens as well when you design the exception aggregation.
    Likewise you can create nested aggregations based on your requirements.
    Please do let me know if it works.
    Thanks.

  • Use of filters and aggregations based on hierarchy nodes in an update rule

    Hello,
    I need to calculate some indicators from a ODS (BW 3.5) that contain raw data to another one that will contain indicators. These figures are the results of the use of filters and aggregations based on hierarchy nodes (for example: all sales accounts under a node).
    In fact, this is typically a query but I want to store these figures, so I need
    I understood I have to use a start routine. I never did that before.
    Could you provide me with easy-to-understand-for-newbies examples of:
    - filtering data based on the value of an infoobject (value must be empty, for example)
    - filtering and aggregation of data based on the appartenance to hierarchy nodes (all sales figures, ....)
    - aggregation of the key figures based on different characteristics after filtering of these
    Well, I am asking a lot ...
    Thank you very much
    Thomas

    Please go through the following link to learn more on aggregates:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e55aaca6-0301-0010-928e-af44060bda32
    Also go through the very detailed documentation:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/67efb9bb-0601-0010-f7a2-b582e94bcf8a
    Regards,
    Mahesh

  • Execution of a planning function for a row selection of a hierarchy node

    Hi all!
    Has anyone accomplished to make a configuration, where a planning function would have been executed for a hierarchy node selection and this selection would have been made by a row selection in an analysis item? I can filter the characteristic in a lowest level by selecting rows in analysis item, but if I would select a hierarchy node, the value for the characteristic is empty. I have set the selection state by binding the item_characteristic of analysis item to filter of the other characteristics.
    I tried first to reach this functionality by filtering the characteristic with variables in planning modeller filter and determining the values of the variables during runtime by the selection of the analysis item row selection. But I can not implement it as the display hierachy and the hierarchy node selection in the analysis item  are variables and modeller does not allow selection of a hierarchy node and hierarchy by variables - even thoug it let's you do it (I receive error message saying "field hienmflag with value 5 is not correct").
    Greatful for any working solutions tips you have made up!
    Sari

    Thanks for the explanation. I come from BPS background and there are few changes when it comes to planning functions in IP.  In BPS, the planning function is a bit loosely tied to Planning Package in a sense that a planning function can use any planning package under the planning level to which it belongs.  Same is the case in IP (technically), but in BPS the planning package contains all the characteristics and key figures of the planning level and hence the function can execute correctly.  What I see in IP is that planning function is very loosely tied to Filter.  It can use any filter under the aggregation level even though they differ in the characteristics and key figures.  I have tried a PF with different filters and it executes with everyone of them!  This doesnu2019t sound right!  Am I missing something here?
    Also, you can only execute a IP planning function if it is included in a planning sequence.  An extra step!  The modeling is so intuitive in BPS that IP is a bit repulsive.

  • Hierarchy Node not summing  properly in Bex Analyzer

    Hi Folks,
                      I am facing an issue in my report where the Hierarchy node is not summing up numbers properly.  Just a simple example
               Char 1   Value
               123        10.1
                231         2.1
                122        -2.1
    Node 1 -
                            10 (instead of 10.1)
    I have tried NODIM functional already and also tried exception aggregation (since I can't use "Calculate result as" option in a heirarchy) for my keyfigues. Please help as I can't think of any other solution. It seems like the node is ignoring the rounding of values which is done by bex for leafs automatically and is only bringing result priod to rounding. This is my assumption. Looking forward to suggestions. Thanks
    Regards,
      Asad

    Asad,
        Check the no of decimal places you have set for the key figures. Change it to the required no of decimal places.

  • Reassignment of hierarchy nodes dynamically

    Hi Experts,
    I have a requirement wherein I need to re-assign the hierarchy node for an account based on Functional area.
    Currently, we load 0ACCOUNT info object with hierarchy defined in KDH3 transaction in R/3. Here, the account 650000000 is defined under local accounts node of the hierarchy. Hence, when we use the 0account infobject in BEx with hierarchy activated, all the records in transaction data with account no. 650000000 are aggregated under local accounts node.
    However, the user wants us to check the functional area for each of the record with 65000000 account and re-assign it to a different node of the hierarchy. For example, if the transaction data has account number 65000000 and functional area 400, then the record needs to be aggregated under a different node in hierarchy, say overhead costs. Similarly, if there is another record with account 650000000 and functional area 300, then the record needs to be aggregated under Sales & marketing.
    How do we handle such conditional assignment of hierarchy nodes?
    Regards,
    SS

    Hi,
    I really doubt if dynamic reassignment of hierarchy nodes is possible in BW, but could be wrong.
    Alternatives which you can consider
    a. A flat hierarchy modeled in the dimension of the cube i.e. higher levels of 0ACCOUNT can be filled during transformations based on functional area. Major disadvantage here is that any change to the hierarchy or assignment could require reloads depending on your requirement i.e. touch history data or not
    b.Customized Hierarchy created by combining the original hierarchy and the assignment details
    for eg 
    Leaf Node: 650000000_400 under parent Overhead Costs
    Leaf Node: 650000000_300,under parent Sales & Marketing
    Regards,
    Advait

  • Suppressing aggregation in Hierarchy

    Hi,
    Hi,
    We are getting following data from ECC for WBS
    WBS_____________Cost_______POC(%)
    WBS1____________ 00_________40
    WBS1.1___________70_________60 
    WBS1.2___________50_________20
    Requirement is  to show cost & POC  along WBS hierarchy
    WBS________________Cost_______POC(%)
    WBS1_______________120________40
    |--->WBS1.1___________70_________60 
    |--->WBS1.2___________50_________20
    When we are creating report, it is basically aggregating all values of WBS 1, 1.1 & 1.2  like following
    WBS________________Cost_______POC(%)
    WBS1_______________120________80
    |--->WBS1____________ 00_________40
    |--->WBS1.1___________70_________60 
    |--->WBS1.2___________50_________20
    In this we can hide WBS1 in the leaf node, but still problem remains with WBS1 in the parent node showing aggregated value (80) instead of actual value (40).
    Has anyone done like this before? Appreciate your help...!!!
    Thanks & Regards,
    Vikram.

    Hi,
    I am able to achieve this using the Exception aggregation - "No aggregation of Posted Nodes along Hierarchy" property of CKF. Now its working fine.
    - Vikram.

  • How to filter hierarchy node in BEX query designer

    Dear experts
    We are working on FI balance sheet with hierarchy infoobject 0GLACCEXT. Example of our balance sheet is as follow:
    Parent Node A = 20
         Sub-parent Node A1 = 10
             Leaf A11 = 5
                 Leaf A12 = 5
    Parent Node B = 20
         Sub-parent Node B1 = 10
                   Leaf B11 = 5
                   Leaf B12 = 5
    We require only:
        Sub-parent Node A1 = 10
        Leaf B12 = 5
    So I filter those out in BEX restriction;  however, after we examine the report in tcode RSRT, "Sub-parent Node A1" is not shown in BEX Report, and the result is as follow：
    Parent Node B = 5
         Sub-parent Node B1 = 5
                 Leaf B12 = 5
    Are there solutions for us to show merely A1 and B12 ?

    Hi Chu
    Try the following steps.
    Initial Output
    In this example I will restrict the query for only displaying Node 8603 and leaf 9000
    Proceed to restrict the Characteristic. Please be aware of the difference between hierarchy nodes and leaf characteristic values. Also set the Hierarchy display properties to expand up to level 1.
    Execute the query again:
    Please be aware that users will still be able to expand node 8603 and see the lower level nodes/leaf. In order to restrict users from doing this set up users authorizations.
    Regards,
    Carlos

  • DSO or ODS "Insert New Hierarchy Nodes" under Data Fields

    When you insert info objects under the Data Fields in DSO right mouse click on the Data Fields icon and you will find Insert New Hierarchy Nodes . I created a hierarchy node with infoobjects associating with it which will be visible under the Filters Folder in BEx Query designer as a seperate folder. I can add them to the infoobjects from this folder into the query. I did not know how to apply this functionality in Queries and what it really does. My guess was you can create dynamic hierarchy using characteristic infoobjects from transactional data.Any ideas or links to documentation. This option was available from 7.X in DSO's and i think even in 3.x ODS.

    Hi,
    May help you:----
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/4a/e71f39488fee0ce10000000a114084/content.htm
    You could feel the flexibility of using this hierarchial display in the Query. Try to create any Query on this DSO.
    Regards,
    Suman

  • Drilldown to hierarchy nodes in VC..

    Hi..
    I want drilldown functionality in VC..
    1. my Query has a hierarchy
    2. my VC application has a table attached to this query.
    3. In Output the hierarchy nodes are displayed
    4. i ve taken a button Drilldown on my table
    5. on selection of a node and onclick of button all the hierarchy nodes get expanded(drilled down)
    Problem : i do not want all the nodes to get drilled down..only the selected node should get drilled..
    Plz help me out for the same...
    Thanks in advance..
    Bhavna.

    Hi,
    Just check out in hierarchy attribute setting... what is the start node for the drill down..
    Regards,
    Viren.

  • Issue with hierarchy node variable and multiple SAP hierarchies

    Hello experts,
    We are currently facing an issue when using two SAP hierarchies in Web Intelligence and one of them is restricted with a hierarchy node variable.
    The systems we use are a SAP BI 7.01 (SPS 05) and a Business Objects Enterprise XI R3.1 SP2 (fix pack 2.3). I want also to point out that the fix pack 2.3 has been applied to all BOE related components: the SAP integration Kit, client tools, and enterprise (server and client).
    The universe used in our scenario is based on a BEX Query with two hierarchies (non-time dependent hierarchies, intervals allowed) loaded on their corresponding characteristics. One of these characteristics is restricted with a hierarchy node variable (manual input, optional, ready for input, multiple single values allowed). 
    Prerequisites for replicating the problem:
    1)     When building the web intelligence query select several levels from both hierarchies (they have seven levels each) and    the   only amount of the InfoCube that the BEX query (that was used to create our universe) relies on.
    2)     In the hierarchy node variable prompt select a hierarchy node entry (not an actual InfoObject value that exists as transactional data in the InfoCube )
    By executing the query built above, all characteristics are returned null (no value) and the key figure with value u201C0u201D. No error messages, no partial results warnings.  Now if we go back to u201CEdit queryu201D and select levels of only one of any of the two hierarchies the query runs normally (by selecting the exact same value for the hierarchy node variable prompt).
    Any ideas on the matter?
    Regards,
    Giorgos

    Hi,
    Have you ever got a solution for this problem?
    I have a similar one.
    Thanks,
    regards, Heike

  • Hierarchy Node Variable search (find) option not working

    Hi Experts - I have created a hierarchy node varibale on a fixed hierarchy. When user run the report and click on hierarchy node variable selection option , A new window will pop up which has all the nodes.
    As the list is quite big and has many levels , On the same pop up , we have find option , when we enter any node in the find box , its always give a ABAP Dump , It never works for me...
    Is node find/search in not working in Bi 7.0 .
    Thanks
    R

    Hi Rohan,
    We can restrict the hierchey level at property of of the hiearchey enabled characteristic.
    Hope this hels...let me know if u require any further info on this..
    Best Regards,
    Maruthi

  • How to pass a hierarchy node variable value over OpenDocument?

    Hello,
    I have been unable to link to an instance with matching parameters with opendocument with hierarchy node variables.
    Has anyone attempted this or been successful?
    Please reference this post I had in the Web Intelligence forum.  sInstance=Param not working for sap bw query based reports (FWM 02020)
    Here's some background information
    We've created 2 new crystal reports based of sap queries.
    Report 1, single prompt, no hierarchy.
    Result : Can link to specific instance with matching parameters. Great!
    Report 2, single prompt, hierarchy based.
    Result: Cannot link to specific instance with matching parameters
    Parameter list for report 2
    [!V000001} : Cost Center/Gr{oup (Multiple) = {0COSTCENTER XXXXXXXX.BGT3}.{XXXXXXXXX.BGT3 0HIER_NODE} - XXX, XXX & XXX
    However when I go into the history and look at the successful instance parameters used, it seems to be picking up an extra parameter ( my guess is node)
    XXX, XXX & XXX; {0COSTCENTER XXXXXXXX.BGT3}.{XXXXXXXXX.BGT3 0HIER_NODE} - XXX, XXX & XXX
    We have attempted to use the entire string, the first portion, second portion, and just the technical response. No luck.
    Any help or pointers would be appreciated!
    Nick

    Hello  Ingo,
    I'll explain the situation more clearly,
    Report 2, single prompt, hierarchy based.
    Result: Cannot link to specific instance with matching parameters with a response from the Bus Objects server
    An error has occurred: The object with ID -1 does not exist in the CMS or you don't have the right to access it (FWM 02020)
    We have 1 parameter for report 2
    {!V000001} : Cost Center/Group (Multiple)
    We selected a single value:
    {0COSTCENTER XXXXXXXX.BGT3}.{XXXXXXXXX.BGT3 0HIER_NODE} - XXX, XXX & XXX
    (The XXX, XXX, & XXX is the description)
    We ran a successful instance.
    However when I go into the history and look at the successful instance parameters used it displays the following: 
    XXX, XXX & XXX; {0COSTCENTER XXXXXXXX.BGT3}.{XXXXXXXXX.BGT3 0HIER_NODE} - XXX, XXX & XXX
    An extra description seems to appear (The first XXX, XXX & XXX;) Our original selection was only {0COSTCENTER   XXXXXXXX.BGT3}.{XXXXXXXXX.BGT3 0HIER_NODE} - XXX, XXX & XXX
    We attempted to build variations of the open document strings
    1. We tried the entire parameter response,
    XXX, XXX & XXX; {0COSTCENTER XXXXXXXX.BGT3}.{XXXXXXXXX.BGT3 0HIER_NODE} - XXX, XXX & XXX
    2. The first description that was not part of the original selection,
    XXX, XXX & XXX
    3. The technical name and description
    {0COSTCENTER XXXXXXXX.BGT3}.{XXXXXXXXX.BGT3 0HIER_NODE} - XXX, XXX & XXX
    4. The technical name
    {0COSTCENTER XXXXXXXX.BGT3}.{XXXXXXXXX.BGT3 0HIER_NODE}
    Please let me know if you need more details.
    Regards,
    Nick

  • Data slice inconsistency problem with hierarchy nodes

    Hi Experts,
    We want to lock planning tables from function. We create the appropriate data slices but there are problems with (material group) hierarchy nodes.
    If I give the node as input variable to the function it causes inconsistency in the data slice. If I choose and add this node to the lock in modeler, the problem is the same.
    We are using the following variables to create a data slice:
    0VERSION
    0VTYTYPE
    0COMP_CODE
    ZGRMAT (developed material group)
    Z_YEARCR (developed yera created)
    The problem also exist if I set an another type of node e.g. destination country (0RECIPCNTRY) instead of material group.
    For me, the problem seems to be generic.
    Do you have any idea?
    Many thanks in advance
    Peter

    There is a note related to this proble:
    Note 1070608 - Lowflag field is not valid
    The implementation of this note resolves the problem.
    Peter

  • Exclude a hierarchy node by using exit variable (not in query designer)

    Hi gurus!!
    I have a hierarchy for the infoObject 0COSTELMNT. Depending on the user who executes the report, the node '0599ADJUSTMENTS' must be displayed or not.
    I am trying to solve it by using an exit variable:
    Varible Type: Hierarchy Node
    Processing : Exit
    On the exit, I have entered the following code:
          IF ( sy-subrc = 0 ).
              l_s_range-sign = 'E' .
              l_s_range-opt  = 'EQ' .
              l_s_range-low = 'AJUSTES'.
              APPEND l_s_range TO e_t_range.
         ENDIF.
    But unfortunately does no work!!
    Any ideas?
    Thanks in advance
    Regards.
    Carmen Rodríguez

    Hi,
    Check the below link gives good knowledge on variables:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/cf/579b3c494d8e15e10000000a114084/content.htm
    Reg
    Pra

Maybe you are looking for