Alpha channel, quiktime and iweb

Hi guys, I am using a quicktime movie with alpha (transparent) background. When I place it in my iweb window it looks ok, but when I publish it to my site the alpha info is gone and the background is black. Does anyone know how to do this right?
I don't want to use flash since I want people to open it in the IPAD.  the problem can be seen at www.ghostshipapps.com
Thanks.

As always, focus on the problem : your movie
vionconalfa.mov
It won't open in QT player because it isn't a movie.
Go back where you created the movie and make it work.
And have a look here and see if that gets you there :
     http://www.wyodor.net/_Discussions2/LotsAWater/

Similar Messages

  • Better Alpha channel handling

    I've asked for this a lot: alpha channel saving with PS is terrible, and could use an update. And today, I was embarrassed by a bug that caused our game engine to perform poorly as a result of the way Photoshop handles the alpha channel.
    The bug: make a 1024x1024 canvas, give it an opaque alpha channel (100% white, every pixel), then Image Size it down to something smaller, like 128x128. Now look at your alpha channel: grey pixels all along the border. ARRGGGHHH!!!1!1! It interpolated, I'm sure, using black alpha outside the canvas that doesn't actually exist, changing, in a powerful, fundamental way, the nature of the alpha channel. Video cards care about this stuff: 99.9% opaque is not 100% opaque. This is terrible.
    The request: That PS intelligently offer better defaults when saving an image with an alpha. Right now, it offers, "What was the last bit depth you saved an image to?" Regardless of the fact that the previous image may have no relationship to the following image being saved, the default offering is always "what I did last time". This enables very easy pruning of alpha channels that should be there, or adding opaque alpha channels that shouldn't be there, bloating the file size.
    I'd like PS to determine if an alpha channel is present, and base its default choice on that. If one is present, default to 32-bits. If an alpha channel si not present, default to 24-bits. That easy.
    If multiple alpha channels are present, I'd like a dropdown menu to pick which one I want. Right now, if you save a PSD with multiple alpha channels to a 32-bit TGA, it throws all alpha channels away, and saves the image with a solidly opaque alpha channel, the choice no one asked for.
    For texture work, or works where the graphics card is the destination, not the printed page, this cavalier handling of alpha channels is definitely not sustainable.
    I'd love to never have to ask for this again.

    Generally speaking the resize of an image on a layer in which the canvas is exactly the size of the data will result in transparency peeking in around the edge (i.e., I'm agreeing with you here, just using Photoshop terms).  I've always thought this was kind of poorly thought-out too.  As you say, the algorithm must default to using 0 vs., say, replicating (or "clamping") to the alpha of the pixels right on the edge.
    I suppose theoretically, the thinking is that if you were to EXPAND the canvas, the area around the image would be transparent anyway, and a subsequent resampling would then have the same result as the above.
    Knowing this, one way to work around the problem would be to create a slightly larger image, then Canvas Size it down to your intended resolution.  That way there's layer data beyond the edges with which the resizing algorithm can work.  I realize that's probably not a practical solution in general, but a trick to keep up your sleeve if you really do need that 128 x 128 image with alpha solid to the edge.
    -Noel

  • Inconsistant alpha channel import on .mov files

    I am creating a movie using animation I create in Maya which is then composed in Shake with some alpha masks and exported using the animation codec to a .mov file into Motion. In reviewing my workflow (I'm about midway through things) I recognized I had an error in my screen sizes from one tool to the next and while it was not too noticeable, I thought it best to correct. This is where I should have left dead dogs lie.....
    Anyway, this is best described with the flow I show below:
    Motion Project Setup on ALL file types
    720x480, 8bit, NTSC D1/DV
    Lower First (Even)
    29.97 Fps
    Background Color - Black
    Background - Transparent
    Case 1:
    Maya__->_Shake___->Anim Codec_________>Motion 720x480
    720x486->720x486-->_Mil+_Col-->foo.mov-->File squished 6 pixels in Y
    but alpha is present
    Case 2:
    720x480->720x480-->_Mil+_Col-->foo2.mov->File is 8 pixels narrow in X
    alpha channel is not preset
    I open foo.mov and foo2.mov in shake and look at the files and the
    size is as follows:
    foo.mov - 720x486
    foo2.mov - 720x480
    BOTH .mov files have the alpha channel present and the data is correct.
    Just for grins, I output a file sequence of .tif files from shake of the
    foo2.mov files and verified that the alpha channel was present in
    photoshop and then did an import into motion with the same results of
    foo2.mov. Size is shrunk by 8 pixels in X and no alpha channel.
    It appears at least that Motion is making decisions based upon the screen
    size and importing or not importing the alpha channel.
    Any thoughts would be very much appreciated.

    Well, it is strange. Shake says it is 720 and for that matter so does Motion in the Media tab. Motion says it is 720x480 as does shake but when the clip is overlayed against the black background you can see 4 pixels on each side of the clip. The motion project file says it is 720x480 too.
    UPDATE....
    I just checked the motion file and deleted all of the media clips, but when I went to the media tab there was still one copy of the old 720x486 clip there. Every time and method I tried to delete it, it would crash motion. So, I copied all of the other text data I was using motion to generate, created a new motion project and pasted the text in. When I import the 720x480 file into the new project it lines up perfect. This must be a "feature mode" I must have gotten motion into.
    Anyway, problem solved. Thanks much for your help Andy. I kept looking at this and not seeing the forest for the trees.
    Much appreciated.

  • Sudden problem with importing tiff files with alpha channel (CS5)

    OK this is driving me nuts. For years I have been importing image files that have an alpha channel  into FCP as.tiff files. I use Photoshop files only when I want to use the layers as they are too cumbersome otherwise). I have recent upgraded Photoshop, etc. to CS5 and now FCP won't import them anymore. I get a message saying: "File error: 1 file(s) recognized, 0 access denied, 1 unknown"
    I am not doing anything different and tiff files created in just the same way in an earlier version of Photoshop import and work just fine. Is this a CS5 bug? Does anyone know of a work around. I want to keep using tiff files as they seem to work best for me with alpha channel work (and I don't see why I need to reinvent the wheel).
    Thanks
    A

    I've had a similar issue recently. Same TIFF files downloaded from the same server, different FCP project, new error. I either see"File error: 1 file(s) recognized, 0 access denied, 1 unknown" or I get the even stranger, "Unrecognized file type."
    I can open them in PS and save them again as TIF, same results. I know these are not CMYK files but even if resave the TIF as RGB, I get the same results, they are not recognized by FCP.
    But if I open them in PS and save them as PNG with alpha, they improt fine.
    I have no idea what's going on.
    bogiesan
    Message was edited by: David Bogie Chq-1

  • Strange alpha channel behavior in jscroll pane

    Hi,
    My first post here.
    I have been strugling for a while with a problem with alpha channel opacity and scrollpane. I basically have a JScrollpane that contains a JPanel with JLabels. The JLabels have a mouse action that changes their background to higlighted by using a color with an alpha channel.
    When a mouse is over a JLabel we call:
    public void mouseOver(){
              this.setForeground(Color.WHITE);
              this.setBackground(new Color(100,100,100,100));
              this.setOpaque(true);
    This works but with some strange rendering problems. Sometimes the "background" shows other parts of the screen insted of the correct background. This is kind of hard to explain so I took a screen shot that elaborates this.
    The correct behavior:
    http://www.rulli.org/~mravimo/seka/correct.jpg
    The wrong bahavior:
    http://www.rulli.org/~mravimo/seka/wrong.jpg

    I think there seems to some abuse of the 'opaque' setting in Java. Opaque, literally, of course, describes something through which nothing can be seen (if you can see through it, it's either translucent or transparent). That means alpha 0 is transparent, alpha 255 (for an 8-bit channel) is opaque, and anything else is translucent.
    ComponentUI uses 'opaque' to determine whether to paint the component background. This is where the semantics are broken: it should really query the background color to see if it's non-null and its alpha is non-zero, thus painting translucent colors as well as opaque. I think there is a good case for this being a Java bug if it's not already - though I'd anticipate the counter-argument being that it will raise issues with backward-compatibility ("if it's been broken long enough, don't fix it").
    The problem you're seeing, I suspect, is due to the same flag being used (semantically correctly) to help optimise the paint process (if something really is opaque then there's no point rendering underneath it).
    Unfortunately, fixing ComponentUI is a non starter since it can only be fixed by extension (multiply the number of components by the number of L&Fs and you're on your way).
    As a workaround you can extend JLabel and override paintComponent(); or plug in a specific label UI which fixed the ComponentUI problem; in both cases leaving the opaque setting at false.

  • Alpha channel issues

    Greetings,
    I'm trying to create a lower third using a still image that I created from a video clip using Quicktime Conversions. I then import it into FCP, drag it to a sequence and then add livetype text to it. In the preview mode on my main sequence when played is fine, but when I render it the alpha channel disappears and a black background replaces my video with the lower third material still there. What happened to my alpha channel? Is there a problem or a bug in FCP 5.1.1? I'm bewildered.
    Thanks,
    Jordan

    Editmojo,
    I exported just the text from Livetype. I'm trying to create a customized lower third, but everytime I render the lower third nested sequence after I have added it to the main sequence a black background takes over with the lower third media there. Ordinarily, when you follow the instructions that I did it automatically keys over the video behind it.What happened? I did not have this problem with FCP 4.5. Is there an issued with FCP 5.1? I just spoke to a tech at Digital Juice regarding the use of their animations and he said that there was an issue with FCP 5.1 when it came to alpha channels. Is that the case? Would the update solve the problem?
    Thanks,
    Jordan

  • Automator or Applescript using png files with alpha channel

    I have hundred of png files with alpha channel.
    I want to suppress alpha channel.
    How can i do it using Automator or Applescript ?
    Thank you very much.

    You can use the free command line image processing tool ImageMagick in your Applescripts or Automator workflows, as well as from a Terminal shell.
    You can download ImageMagick from http://www.imagemagick.org, but Cactuslab has simplified installation by putting together an installer package. It’s available at  http://cactuslab.com/imagemagick/. Download the package and double-click on it. Follow the instructions to install. It will install ImageMagick into /opt/ImageMagick and add it to your $PATH by creating a file in /etc/paths.d/. Restart your computer for the changes to take effect.
    The two ImageMagick commands we’re concerned with are “convert” and “mogrify”. Convert is more efficient for multiple and piped operations on the same image file, and mogrify is more efficient for batch processing. Generally speaking, convert will output a file separate from the input file. Unless a path is specified, mogrify will overwrite the input file with the output file. An important distinction.
    You can perform various operations on the alpha channel using arguments after either the convert or mogrify command. Two of the available arguments are:
    -alpha off - Disables the image's transparency channel. Does not delete or change the existing data, just turns off the use of that data.
    -alpha remove - Composite the image over the background color.
    Also of use are the -flatten and -background options:
    -flatten - overlay all the image layers into a final image and may be used to underlay an opaque color to remove transparency from an image.
    -background - sets the background color.
    Start off using the convert command with a single image to see the effect and adjust to your liking. Once you’ve achieved the desired outcome, then use the mogrify command to batch process the chosen images.
    Before getting into how to use Automator or Applescript in your workflow, use Terminal and the command line to see the effect on a single image. Copy one image to your ~/Desktop. In Terminal change the directory to ~/Desktop by typing the following command and pressing the Enter key:
    cd ~/Desktop
    Then choose the option you are looking for, -alpha remove for instance, type the following command and press the Enter key:
    convert input-photo.png -alpha remove output-photo.png
    You can check the alpha channel (transparency) and background in the Preview app, go View > Show Image Background from the menu bar.
    Once you’re ready to batch proces, place all the photos you want to convert with the same command into one folder. Copy the folder to your ~/Desktop. Let’s assume you’ve labeled the folder “InPhotos”. It’s prudent to manipulate copies in case something goes amiss. In that event you can copy the folder with the originals again and start over. Create a new empty folder on your ~/Desktop and call it “OutPhotos”. Let’s also assume your home directory is called “Me”. The following command will process the photos from the InPhotos folder and put them in the OutPhotos folder:
    mogrify -alpha remove -path /Users/me/Desktop/OutPhotos/ /Users/me/Desktop/InPhotos/*png
    According to Apple Technical Note TN2065:
    "when you use just a command name instead of a complete path, the shell uses a list of directories (known as your PATH) to try and find the complete path to the command. For security and portability reasons, do shell script ignores the configuration files that an interactive shell would read"
    So, you need to use the full path to to ImageMagick commands, unlike in the shell where you can just use the command name.
    To batch process using Automator, use the “Run Shell Script” action (note: retain the single space at the beginning of the last line):
    /opt/ImageMagick/bin/mogrify \
    -alpha remove \
    -path /Users/Me/Desktop/OutPhotos/ \
    /Users/Me/Desktop/InPhotos/*png
    To batch process using Script Editor (Applescript), use the “do shell script” command:
    do shell script "/opt/ImageMagick/bin/mogrify -alpha remove -path /Users/pd/Desktop/OutPhotos/ /Users/pd/Desktop/InPhotos/*png"
    Further info on ImageMagick:
    http://www.imagemagick.org/script/command-line-options.php#alpha
    http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/masking/#remove
    http://www.imagemagick.org/index.php
    http://www.imagemagick.org/script/command-line-tools.php
    http://www.imagemagick.org/script/command-line-options.php
    Examples:
    The original PNG image:
    -alpha off:
    -alpha remove:
    -background black -flatten:
    -background blue -flatten:
    -channel alpha -evaluate Divide 2:
    -channel alpha -evaluate Divide 2 -background black -flatten:

  • Alpha Channel/Border

    When I place an object on an alpha channel, save, and then import into Final Cut, the object has a grey border. How do I remove this?

    Maybe I misinterpret you, but look here: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=3438756&#3438756

  • Cover Flow does alpha channels -- almost!

    Just for fun, inspired by the semi-transparent musical note default cover art, I tried adding some artwork (PICT with alpha channel) for some albums. It works! For example (one I think most people would recognize, even if it dates me somewhat): Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon cover. I knocked out all the black in Photoshop with an alpha channel, saved and added the pict.
    Now when you scroll through, you see only the prism and light beams floating in mid-air; when it's the next or previous album, you see "through" it to the one below it; when it's the current album, it's against black anyway, so it looks correct.
    But... disappointingly, I closed iTunes and reopened it, and drat! The alpha channel is not reloaded! It is in fact still there, which I proved by opening the album, info dialog, select artwork, past into Preview (New from Clipboard) and there it is. (For some reason, I could not get it directly back into Photoshop with the alpha channel, but by saving from Preview, it can then be reloaded.)
    So, we're left with a tantalizing future feature for Cover Flow! Round, or other arbitrary shapes. Maybe 3-D objects somewhere down the line?
    Dual 2Ghz G5   Mac OS X (10.4.7)  

    Using the sort field to try to force things together doesn't quite work, and certainly not when the album artist has more than one album with guests. I think you'll also find there are some enumeration issues in the album menu which may cause the wrong cover to be displayed as you progress through the library. See my recent post on Grouping Tracks Into Albums for a somewhat long, but hopefully comprehensive, exposition of the issues.
    tt2

  • How should I edit an alpha channel after saving?

    I have a series of files in which I improperly modified the selection set prior to saving the selection, and now around the intended viewable area there is a hazy artifact that seems to correspond to where I manually edited the selection using Quick Mask (prior to saving).
    In other words, within the area of the alpha channel that should be invisible, there is actually a visible, unwanted grey-ish artifact, and I think it's related to how I was using the brush to edit the selection in Quick Mask before saving.
    Now I am unable to edit the alpha channel, although Adobe's own website says that in order to edit an alpha channel, all I need to do is select the alpha channel (which I am doing) and then paint at 100% black or white with a brush to either include or exclude parts of selection set.
    When I choose the brush and start painting at 100% black or white, nothing happens and I can't figure out what is happening.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    The exact steps that I'm taking are below:
    1) click on alpha channel (visible and ready for editing), all other channels only visible not active.
    2) selecting the brush at either 100% black or white
    3) attempting to paint to alter the alpha channel (I've tried painting on the actual alpha channel in Channels, and I've tried painting on the alpha channel as it appears in Layers, and neither works for me).
    CLARIFICATION:
    I actually am able to "edit" the alpha channel HOWEVER I cannot remove the hazy artifact. I can use 100% black or white to remove the pink/light red areas on either the actual alpha channel (in the Channels area) or as it appears in Layers, but I cannot remove the areas that are grey-ish (well I can paint them white but I can't paint them black, i.e. fully pink).
    A teacher showed me a quick fix process that basically involves activating the alpha channel, inverting the selection, and then deleting everything outside of the alpha channel, and then resaving the file. That worked at one point, but now that quick fix is not working either (I am just ending up with a completely visible, white space around the intended visible area, rather than an invsible area).
    EDIT (07:22 3.20.13) Also, if you look at what Photoshop is registering as the actual alpha channle, it doesn't match with what I'm seeing above, that is the black and white alpha channel appears to be as expected, and there is not the weird distortion that I'm seeing above in the pink/grey image.
    So I am super confused and would appreciate any help!

    I greatly appreciate your help with this.
    However, after adjustting the black from 99 to 100%, and double checking that the white is fully zero (right now I can't find any files with the white set to anything but "0," so I don't know why some of my screenshots showed that), I am still unable to use black to contract a selection, or white to erase unwanted areas of the alpha channel (this specific post's problem).
    So, I'm completely baffeled and am wondering if there is anything else that could be accounting for these results (i.e. the black and white paint not producing the expected results).
    Thanks again,
    dk
    EDIT:
    I attempted to make another alpha channel, this time without any manual adjustment of selection via the paint brush. Instead, I used the selection modification option of Contract and used it to contract the selection.
    SAME problem. The area that I contracted using Contract, (never painted), is once again displaying a slight grey artifact in the area that is supposed to be completely transparent.

  • Export for DVD with Animation codec without alphas channels not working?

    I'm using FCP 5 with DVDSP. My FCP projects consist of quicktime movies that are using the Animation compressor (for lossless quality), and the movies contain alpha channels (thus they were rendered at Millions + colors to preserve the alphas).
    This is my problem. I want to now export a quicktime movie to use in DVDSP with animation compression, so it is again lossless quality (obviously to presever the quality through these steps). But I do NOT want to preserve the alpha channels, because what I've learned is that when made into a DVD, the alphas are not preserved and the image looks wrong (as if without the alphas).
    So I basically want to "flatten" the video, if there was some way.
    I would assume the solution would be to, in FCP, export a quicktime at animation compression, but set to Millions for colors, and not Millions + (I was taught that the Millions + will preserve the alpha info).
    Well, what's happening is when I set it to that, it renders, but then I get info on the movie in Quicktime and it says it has Millions + still. And thus, it looks wrong in DVDSP.
    What is going on? Is this a bug in FCP?
    Does anyone have an idea as to how to get around this. The only thing that has worked for me is to export the Quicktime movie with "none" for compression, but that's making the movie SO large that I can't work with it and it doesn't play right when I make the DVD.
    I really appreciate anyones help on the matter. Thanks!
    Brian,.
    Quad-core 2.5 G5   Mac OS X (10.4.6)   30" Apple Cinema Display
    Quad-core 2.5 G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)   30" Apple Cinema Display

    Thanks for the suggestions. I have not yet tried laying a solid black video track underneath to see what it does, but it seems like a good idea and I'll try it out to see what happens when I get back home.
    I'll try to explain what I mean by the image looking wrong.
    I'm picking up where another left off, so I'm not sure of how he cut the quicktime movie together; all I know is that they used alpha channels in Photoshop and After Effects to make the image looks the way they want it. This is a drawn character laid on a white background with a black frame around the entire image. It looks the way he wants it to in the quicktime movie, and this quicktime movie is 720x480, animation millions colors +, 24fps.
    This movie, along with others of the like, need to be cut together in FCP and then put on a DVD with DVDSP. When I export it and it looks "wrong", what's happening is there is a black block behind the drawn character. The guy that made the movies in AE says that, that is what it looks like when the alpha channel is not working correctly.
    To test things, I've changed the quicktime compression settings in the sequence settings. If I set it to anything that is not animation, I get that black block in the viewer. (Note though, that if I set it to animation, millions + or not +, it shows the alpha correctly both ways).
    In FCP's user manual it says that if you're passing your movie on to a DVD, to use a high or lossless compression to keep the quality up, like animation or PhotoJPEG. For this reason, I haven't wanted to go to DV - especially with this type of image (graphic drawn shapes), it's easy to see a quality difference.
    It really seems like there is a lot of voodoo involved with compression settings. As for now the best "fool-proof" solution I've found is to re-render the movie in After Effects at millions (not+) so that it won't contain the alpha channel info, and FCP seems to like that a lot more.
    I just wish I could get FCP to work with the movies as they were because I'm having to re-edit everything to work with these new movies now.
    Thanks again for the tips and insight.
    Quad-core 2.5 G5 Mac OS X (10.4.3) 30" Apple Cinema Display
    Quad-core 2.5 G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)   30" Apple Cinema Display

  • Alpha Channel in Photoshop for iWeb instant Alpha?

    Hi,
    Recently i wish to Make a Picture's Background to transperence.
    I try to use a ODD color (green screen's GREEN) as background color so that it'll be easy to delete the background when apply the instant alpha function...but i relize that it doesn't really make sense at all...Most of the parts doesn't process well...
    Question:~
    + What s'ld i do in Photoshop before i bring the picture file into iWeb for instant alpha?Alpha Channel and save as .psd?
    + Do any other useful way to solve the issue above?
    Thanks!!

    Here's what I do:
    1 - open the file, double click on the background layer in the Layer pane to unlock it and add a second layer below the original layer.
    2 - using your tool of choice delete the background you want removed. If the background is a single color I use the Magic Wand tool. You may have to work with the Tolerence number if there's any gradiants. Other wise I use the Quick Selection tool (again you may have to set the Tolerence level)
    3 - When he background is removed you then use the File->Save for Web and Devices option.
    4 - in the next window select PNG8 under Preset and check the Transparency box. Colors is set to 256, Dither at 200% and Web Snap 0% (these are all the defaults the first time I used it).
    5 - The background should show transparent. It it doesn't click on the color that you want transparent in the Color Table and then click on the far left box in the toolbar directly below the color chart. You can add additional colors if desired.
    6 - Save and you're done.
    OT

  • Resolution, audio, alpha channel, and backup questions (newbie)

    Hello!
    Well, after a few weeks of fidgeting around with FCE, I've come up with quite a few questions:
    Image/Audio questions
    A. What is the best still image size for import to a NTSC DV movie? Is it the 720x480 px (3:2 aspect ratio) standard of the DV image, or the 4:3 ratio of your generic CRT TV?
    I know it depends on pan/zoom. This brings up the next question:
    B. I have a still image - literally a blue and black two-color image - that I'd like to zoom. It will start out with a very close shot - and zoom out until it takes up around 10% of the screen. The ending frame (the DV size) will be about 10-12 times smaller than the original image. Does this mean that I should make the original 10-12 times bigger (in both directions) than a DV frame?
    This clip is essentially an imitation of the opening of the movie "Home Alone", where the screen begins blue, and as it zooms out, you see it's a stylized house, which zooms out to a tiny size. That's essentially the effect I'm going for.
    Audio/Video sync issue
    C. Some of the clips I've imported from old iMovie projects are a little out of sync. It's not a conversion issue, but an issue with bad editing on my part . So, I have a still image that's about 1.5 seconds too short - it cuts to the next still, which is 1.5 seconds too long. I've added edit points at both ends of the out-of-sync clip, so that I have a 1.5 second clip, with its own audio and video.
    The problem is that the audio is perfect, but the video is bad. So, I need to replace the video, without changing the audio. How is this done?
    D. Sometimes, I'll end up with either audio or video that's not quite right after importing a movie. However, FCE locks them together. Is there a way to unlock them so that I can change either? Essentially, is there a way to change the audio and video from one clip into two seperate clips?
    E. Can I export a single clip or two only? (eg - the same as the "Share selected clips only" check box the iMovie's share menu)
    Alpha channel/marquee question:
    In one idea I had for this short, I have a still image (and some video) where I'd like to highlight a small area in one part of the image. In one part, it's a small object in the background that I'm highlighting. If you've seen a documentary where they have a group photo, and highlight the face of one particular person, that's the effect I'm going for.
    I've made some Photoshop images that can achieve this effect - using a transparent background, a black top layer (at ~40-80% opacity), and an eliptical marquee for the highlighted portion. I then import it, and fine tune the location/size. It works, but it takes a lot of time to talor each shot. Is there some way to do this IN Final Cut Express? A filter perhaps?
    In addition: (alpha-video)
    is there a way to turn part of a video into an alpha channel, so that it's transparent in the final movie? It's not so much a solid color (as the bluescreen/chroma key technique would need), but more of background. For example, I would like to take some footage of my family walking in front of trees, remove the background, and place an entirely different video/still in. Is that possible?
    Backup: FInal question:
    I have my source media organized fairly well on my external drive. However, if my drive should die, It would be incredibly tedius to re-link all the files. (I do have a fairly current backup of the external files). Not to mention finding the orignal capture files, re-timing the project, and so on. The project file itself is probably the easiest to back up.
    So, how do you back up EVERYTHING? Some projects may have hundreds of files, all over my external drive. Is there some easy way to back up all the files into a single place, like a single folder or DVD, so that if my drive should fail, all the files are in one spot?
    I can export them back to a miniDV tape, but I don't have that many, plus they're $5 a pop. I can do this with Toast, but I'll likely end up missing some out-of-the-way files. If only .Mac's Backup had a Final Cut preset.....
    I know that's a BUNCH of stuff up there, so if you can help with any of them, i'd be appreciative.
    Thanks,
    Daniel
    15" 1.67 Powerbook G4 (non-HiRes), Slot loading iMac DV SE   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   1G RAM on PB, 384 MB iMac.

    Try breaking these up into separate questions. Easier to answer and easier to be found by someone searching for answers to the same question.

  • Making a PDF with an image that has both spot colour channel and alpha channel

    Hi I have a logo that was supplied to us as a PSD it has a transparent background, it also has a pantone colour channel. I have made a alpha channel from the transparent background as well.
    The graphic looks fine in InDesign (alpha channel selected in the import options), ie the background is transparent.
    But when we try to make a Hi Res PDF the result is that the graphic is on a solid white background.
    If I go back to the PSD and merge the spot channel with so that it is just CMYK and try again the PDF is fine, but we obviously loose the spot colour.
    How do you make a PDF with a transparent PSD that has a spot colour?

    You know that annoying response from support staff? "We cannot replicate your issue". Well....
    I created a PSD in CS5, with a bunch of process stuff, then loaded a spot color channel and painted in some pawprints using Pantone 172C:
    Saved this as a PSD file, default settings (maximize compatibility on, but it doesn't make any difference in this situation).
    Created a new InDesign document in CS5, added a gradient and some text, then placed the PSD.  ID understands the PSD has an inbuilt background so there's no need to bother with a dedicated alpha mask:
    Exported from ID using the High Quality Print option (PDF/1.4, which keeps the live transparency):
    Re-exported to PDF/X-1a (based on PDF/1.3 which flattens transparency) - looks exactly the same. In all cases the spot channel is intact and the see-through regions of the PSD are maintained.

  • What codec to convert .MXF and MP4 files into to use with alpha channels in Ae and Pr CS6?

    When I import .mxf File, shot on a Canon C300, into after effects, the alpha channel options are greyed out, when I look in, interpret footage, main. This also is the case importing .MP4 files, shot on a Gopro hero 3. I used to use final cut and using compressor convert the files to pro res 4444 or 422. What's my new workflow for preparing files with alpha channels to use in After Effect and Premiere and do I use Media Encoder to do it?

    When I import .mxf File, shot on a Canon C300, into after effects, the alpha channel options are greyed out, when I look in, interpret footage, main. This also is the case importing .MP4 files, shot on a Gopro hero 3.
    Better question: Where do you expect that Alpha channel to come from and contain any useful info for transparency? You're making a fuss over a non-issue. Unless you apply keying or other methods of creating transparency, even if there were an Alpha channel it would be fully opaque and then what's the point?
    Mylenium

Maybe you are looking for