Alternate table of AP_INVOICE_LINES_ALL in 11i

hi 2 all
I have developed Supplier Statement of Account report in oracle apps r12 and use AP_INVOICE_LINES_ALL table.
it running fine in R12 , but when i run in 11i , compiler raised error on AP_INVOICE_LINES_ALL table , b/c this table is not
available in 11i , so plz guide me what is alternate table in 11i ?
Thanks
Zulqarnain

Hi,
There is no equivalent table of ap_invoice_lines_all of R12 in 11i, this is a new feature/ table structure only in R12. The main table in 11i for AP invoice is ap_invoices_all -> ap_invoice_distributions_all, while in R12 it is ap_invoices_all -> ap_invoice_lines_all -> ap_invoice_distributions_all. The information of the ap_invoice_lines_all in R12 should be available in ap_invoice_distributions_all in 11i.
For the prepayment, you should be able to get it by using ap_invoice_distributions_all.prepay_distribution_id
Hope this helps.

Similar Messages

In 4.6c system, alternate table for SRGBTBREL (available in ECC6)

In ECC6 we have SRGBTBREL which contains the relationship between business object and the documents attached (attached using Generic services for object --> Create Attachment) to it.\
But in SAP 4.6c the same table is not available.
Please suggest is there any other table similar to this which will give me the relationship.
Thank you.
With Regards,
Santanu Samantroy

Hello Andrew
Using a (SDN) report searching for customer-exits in transactions I have found the following exits for transaction FB60 on our 4.6c system:
F050S001            FIDCMT, FIDCC1, FIDCC2: Edit user-defined IDoc segment
F050S002            FIDCC1: Change IDoc/do not send
F050S003            FIDCC2: Change IDoc/do not send
F050S004            FIDCMT, FIDCC1, FIDCC2: Change outbound IDoc/do not send
F050S005            FIDCMT, FIDCC1, FIDCC2 Inbound IDoc: Change FI document
F050S006            FI Outgoing IDoc: Reset Clearing in FI Document
F050S007            FIDCCH Outbound: Influence on IDoc for Document Change
F180A001            Balance Sheet Adjustment
FARC0002            Additional Checks for Archiving MM Vendor Master Data
RFAVIS01            Customer Exit for Changing Payment Advice Segment Text
RFEPOS00            Line item display: Checking of selection conditions
RFKORIEX            Automatic Correspondence
SAPLF051            Workflow for FI (Pre-Capture, Release for Payment)
FEDI0001            Function exits for EDI in FI
Within transaction <b>SE18</b> (BAdI builder) you may find an appropriate BAdI when searching the <b>application hierarchy</b>.
Regards
Uwe

Master tables of Receipt in 11i - Very urgent

Guru's,
Oracle version: 11.5.10.2
Can you plz let me know what are the modules and its tables gets affected whenever a receipt is created in Oracle purchasing? This is of high importance, so please provide the necessary info.
Thanks in advance,
Sen
Edited by: Sen2008 on Oct 8, 2009 3:00 AM

The tables provided by Arun are right for when the receipt happens, your question is what about inventory tables.
Inventory tables are updated by a follow on transaction - if the setup for routing method is direct delivery receipt and deliver
transactions happen immediately and hence deliver populates inventory tables.
mlt_material_transactions, mtl_transaction_accounts and qoh tables.
If the receipt routing method is set to Standard/Inspection required, the delivery trxn would not happen immediately.

Please confirm wheather the tables changed or obsoleted from 11i to R12.

All,
Can you please let me know whether the following tables are replaced/obsoleted and such information from 11i to R12 as part of upgrade.Please let me know if you need any further information.
Just want to know ,the following tables are changed from 11i to R12,if yes what has changes & what has replaced with.
General Ledger (GL)
GL_PERIODS
GL_BUDGETS
GL_PERIOD_STATUSES
GL_BALANCES
GL_BUDGET_VERSIONS
GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS
GL_BALANCES
GL_JE_CATEGORIES_TL
GL_JE_SOURCES_TL
GL_JE_BATCHES
GL_JE_HEADERS
GL_JE_LINES
Accounts Payable (AP)
AP_TERMS_TL
AP_CHECKS_ALL
AP_INVOICES_ALL
AP_BATCHES_ALL
AP_HOLDS_ALL
AP_PAYMENT_SCHEDULES_ALL
AP_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS_ALL
AP_LOOKUP_CODES
AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL
AP_INVOICE_PAYMENTS_ALL
Fixed Assets (FA)
FA_BOOKS
FA_ADDITIONS_TL
FA_ADDITIONS_B
FA_ASSET_HISTORY
FA_CATEGORIES_B
FA_CATEGORIES_TL
FA_CATEGORY_BOOKS
FA_CATEGORY_BOOK_DEFAULTS
FA_DISTRIBUTION_HISTORY
FA_DEPRN_DETAIL
FA_DEPRN_PERIODS
FA_RETIREMENTS
FA_LOCATIONS
FA_ASSET_INVOICES
FA_RETIREMENTS
FA_TRANSACTION_HEADERS
FA_CALENDAR_PERIODS
Purchasing (PO)
PO_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL
PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_ALL
PO_NOTIFICATION_CONTROLS
PO_ACTION_HISTORY
PO_LINE_TYPES_TL
PO_HAZARD_CLASSES_B
Thanks a lot in advance.

Please see your other thread -- 11i to R12 Tables/Views Replacement or obsoleted.

R12 tables

Hi ,
we are upgrading the 11.5.10.2 to R12.1.3 . I was found some of the tables got obsolete in 11i and changed those in R12. and i want know join condition between following tables.
note: i want know join condtions between these below tables.
select
asic.org_id ,
asic.check_date,
asic.bank_account_id,
asic.checkrun_name c_checkrun_name,
FROM apps.ap_checks_all asic,
apps.po_vendor_sites_all pvs,
apps.po_vendor_contacts pvc,
apps.po_vendors pov,
apps.ap_bank_branches abb,
apps.ap_bank_accounts_all aba
where
--NVL(asic.checkrun_name, 'MANUAL') =
--NVL(:p_payment_batch, NVL(asic.checkrun_name, 'MANUAL'))
pvc.vendor_site_id(+) = pvs.vendor_site_id
AND asic.vendor_id = pov.vendor_id
AND pov.vendor_id = pvs.vendor_id(+)
AND asic.bank_account_id = aba.bank_account_id
and abb.bank_branch_id = aba.bank_branch_id
thanks
Swamy

11
R12 tables
Posted: Nov 17, 2011 1:29 AM
r12 [Edit]
Click to edit this message... Edit Click to report abuse... Click to reply to this thread Reply
Hi ,
we are upgrading the 11.5.10.2 to R12.1.3 . I was found some of the tables got obsolete in 11i and changed those in R12. and i want know join condition between following tables.
note: i want know join condtions between these below tables.
select
asic.org_id ,
asic.check_date,
asic.bank_account_id,
asic.checkrun_name c_checkrun_name,
FROM apps.ap_checks_all asic,
apps.po_vendor_sites_all pvs,
apps.po_vendor_contacts pvc,
apps.po_vendors pov,
apps.ap_bank_branches abb,
apps.ap_bank_accounts_all aba
where
--NVL(asic.checkrun_name, 'MANUAL') =
--NVL(:p_payment_batch, NVL(asic.checkrun_name, 'MANUAL'))
pvc.vendor_site_id(+) = pvs.vendor_site_id
AND asic.vendor_id = pov.vendor_id
AND pov.vendor_id = pvs.vendor_id(+)
AND asic.bank_account_id = aba.bank_account_id
and abb.bank_branch_id = aba.bank_branch_id
thanks
Swamy

Link between ZX tax tables and gl_code_combinations table in R12

Hi All,
I am new to Oracle apps. We are upgrading from EBS 11i to R12.1.3. In it, ar_vat_tax is obolete. I know its replacement is ZX_rates_b table. But in 11i, they are connected using
ar_vat_tax.tax_account_id = gl_code_combinations.code_combination_id
Now I am not able to find the join between zx tax tables and gl_code_combinations. Can anyone please help how to link these ZX tax table to gl_code_combinations???
Regards,
Swapnil K.

Resolved the issue.
There is a table called ZX_ACCOUNTS. Use the column tax_account_ccid in it. Link ZX_ACCOUNTS.tax_account_entity_id to ZX_RATES_B.tax_rate_id.
Regards,
Swapnil K.

Problem with BSEG table

Hi All,
When select data from BSEG into it_bseg table and loop at it_bseg then system takes more time
and give the runtime error in the quality server.
to get data fast from BSEG into it_bseg table and run fast the loop at it_bseg.
WIPRO company did the one programe to my company , that programe displays the data very fast using
BSEG table.
Thanks.

Hi,
Instead of using BSEG table use these alternate tables....
Cleared items:
BSAD Accounting: Secondary Index for Customers (Cleared Items)
BSAK Accounting: Secondary Index for Vendors (Cleared Items)
BSAS Accounting: Secondary Index for G/L Accounts (Cleared Items)
Non-cleared items:
BSID Accounting: Secondary Index for Customers
BSIK Accounting: Secondary Index for Vendors
BSIM Secondary Index, Documents for Material
BSIP Index for Vendor Validation of Double Documents
BSIS Accounting: Secondary Index for G/L Accounts
Hope its helps

TABLE RELATIONS

Hi All,
Got a query regarding table relations in SCM. I am tring to make a report for quantity in transit. That is Total quantity in the delivery - the quantity whose GR is done. Incase a full Gr is done then quantity in transit would be zero.
Now the problem is specially for UL type deliveries that is deliveries in which P.O is not created we create it from vl01no t-code.
CASE 1 :- Here if we take VBFA table we get item nos from the delivery for reference. But the report is for moment type '101. 102, 605, 606' and the readings for moment type 602 dont come in the table vbfa, for the rest Vbfa is a okay.
CASE 2 :- If we take Mkpf and mseg for the gr quantity then we get all moment type entries but for UL type deliveris that is deliveries without P.O we are not able to get item nos realation, ebelp field is there in mseg but that is for Deliveries against P.Os but we got UL type deliveries.
So what I would like to know is either help me how to configure or what changes needed so that moment type 606 goes to table vbfa
or
I get an item no ref for the deliveries in mkpf.
or
An alternate Table.
Rgds,
Anu.

Yes you are right Vaibhav, I forgot to mark Student_Number as
Primary Key. Thanks
Thank you very much for your help Latheesh.
I just was wondering if tblStudentClass will cause an error since there is no Primary Key in it.
When I try to insert value in tblStudentClass gives me error.
Erdal Huzmeli

Batch bursting reports with alternate aliases

Using HFR 9.3.1 we are using the batch bursting option to generate multiple PDF files. One of the features we are using is the MemberAlias for the file names. This gives each file a different name based on the member alias in the POV.
The issue we are running into is that no matter what I have tried, it will only leverage the default alias table. I have tried setting the alias table in the report to the alternate alias table, in fact when I open the report the member in the report is the correct alias from the alternate table. But the report label generated by the burst option is using the default alias.
I also tried making the alternate alias table the "Active" alias table at the database level, which did not help either.
Anyone come across this and figure out a way to get it to work properly?
TIA

Hi,
If the reports are in the 'book' which is then bursted out then the 'book' property has the settings for the alias table to be used when the 'book' is run. You may want to try that option too.
Regards

Question about tables – alternating fills

Apologies, but I new to the world of Tables and, as an exercise only, I am trying to create following:
I have a to create a table 21 columns wide (they're very narrow) and nine rows deep
I want theTOP ROW ONLY to have an alternating fill of 50% black; the first column being white then 50%; then white and so on.
Producing the alternating fill is (obviously) very easy, but I am struggling to limit it to the top row only.
Can anyone advise on the best approach

Actually it is not working. I copied the text of the script, inserted into Adobe Extended Script Tool, saved it as *.jsx and added into InDesign User Scripts.
I create a table and ran the script and it returned an error
It might be missing something in the script.
Here it is what I took from that post:
app.doScript(function() {
// Put Swatch names in here, many as you like:
var rowFills = [
    "Blue",
    "None",
    "Black"
// Put Percentages in here, again many as you like:
var rowTints = [
    50,
    0,
    25
table = app.selection[0];
if (table.hasOwnProperty("baseline")) table = table.parent;
if (table instanceof Cell) table = table.parent;
if (table instanceof Column) table = table.parent;
if (table instanceof Row) table = table.parent;
if (table instanceof Table)
    var startAt = table.headerRowCount;
    var numRows = table.rows.length-startAt-table.footerRowCount;
    for (r=0; r<numRows; r++)
      table.rows[startAt+r].fillColor = app.activeDocument.swatches.item(rowFills[r % rowFills.length]);
      table.rows[startAt+r].fillTint = rowTints[r % rowTints.length];
} else
    alert ("Yeah, come to think of it you were actually nowhere near a table, werentya?");
    exit();
}, ScriptLanguage.JAVASCRIPT, undefined, UndoModes.ENTIRE_SCRIPT, "Alternate Table Fills");
Anyway, thank you for idea.

Table alternative fills - issue

I have small doubt regarding the above image
Is there any way to create these alternative table fills in indesign in this method? this one i created manually. i hava large document contains full of tables, my client asking like this.
can anyone help me with this?

Alternatively, use this Javascript. Had some fun working around merged cells too (try it!).
var currTable = null;
if (app.selection.length == 1)
          currTable = app.selection[0];
          if (currTable.hasOwnProperty ("baseline"))
                    currTable = currTable.parent;
          if (currTable instanceof Cell)
                    currTable = currTable.parent;
          if (currTable instanceof Row)
                    currTable = currTable.parent;
          if (currTable instanceof Column)
                    currTable = currTable.parent;
          if (!(currTable instanceof Table))
                    currTable = null;
var swatchlist = [];
for (i=0; i<app.activeDocument.swatches.length; i++)
          swatchlist.push (app.activeDocument.swatches[i].name);
swatchDialog = app.dialogs.add ({name:"Set Alternate Table Fill",canCancel:true});
with (swatchDialog)
          with (dialogColumns.add())
                    with (dialogRows.add())
                              staticTexts.add ({staticLabel:"Top left swatch"});
                              listbox1 = dropdowns.add ({stringList:swatchlist, selectedIndex:0});
                    with (dialogRows.add())
                              staticTexts.add ({staticLabel:"Next swatch"});
                              listbox2 = dropdowns.add ({stringList:swatchlist, selectedIndex:0});
                    if (currTable != null)
                              with (dialogRows.add())
                                        with (radiobuttonGroups.add())
                                                  justthisone = radiobuttonControls.add({staticLabel:"Just this one table", checkedState:true});
                                                  allofem = radiobuttonControls.add({staticLabel:"All tables", checkedState:false});
if (currTable != null)
          try {
                    listbox1.selectedIndex = getSwatchIndex(currTable.cells[0].fillColor);
          } catch (_) { }
          try {
                    listbox2.selectedIndex = getSwatchIndex(currTable.cells[1].fillColor);
          } catch (_) { }
if (swatchDialog.show())
          if (justthisone.checkedState == true)
                    doTable (currTable, app.activeDocument.swatches.item(listbox1.selectedIndex), app.activeDocument.swatches.item(listbox2.selectedIndex) );
          } else
                    for (st=0; st<app.activeDocument.stories.length; st++)
                              for (ta=0; ta<app.activeDocument.stories[st].tables.length; ta++)
                                        doTable (app.activeDocument.stories[st].tables[ta], app.activeDocument.swatches.item(listbox1.selectedIndex), app.activeDocument.swatches.item(listbox2.selectedIndex));
function getSwatchIndex (swatch)
          var i;
          for (i=0; i<app.activeDocument.swatches.length; i++)
                    if (app.activeDocument.swatches[i] == swatch)
                              return i;
          return 0;
function doTable (table, swatch1, swatch2)
          var c;
          for (c=0; c<table.cells.length; c++)
                    table.cells[c].fillColor = ((table.cells[c].parentRow.index ^ table.cells[c].parentColumn.index) & 1) ? swatch2 : swatch1;

Restoring damaged tables

Hi All.
Refer SN831678
I have a damaged table on my quality system - I followed the above note to point 6.
In my system table "/BI59807" has an alternative name of /BI0/F0SD_C03 I followed the instructions via point 6 and created this table via SE14. The problem is that the original table is a PF while the new table that SE14 created was a LF - the alternative name was also slightly different from the original.
I decided to recreate it and therefore deleted "/BI59807" however SE14 sees /BI0/F0SD_C03 as existing (create table is greyed out)
What I also do not understand is that this table on my development system is also a LF although the alternate name is "/BIC/DZMP_C101+020"
I need assistance with understanding how the alternative names work please. Fortunately the file I am working with is a file that we do not use but I have 2 damaged files on my production system that I also need to fix and I do not want these delays or problems when I do them.
Thank-you
Anette

Hi Anette,
first a few words to the alternate names and system names for a better understanding of the situation. The database can only work with tablenames up to ten characters. Therefore the OS system creates automatically a "system name" when the original table name is longer than 10 characters. This system name is build from the the first 3 characters of the original table name appended by a contigous number. Therefore you can't compare the "system name" of a table in two different systems, i.e. the development system and the quality system as in your case. Most likely you'll have different "alternate table names".
When you've created now the table "/BI0/F0SD_C03" via SE14 the OS system assigned a new "system name" which is in your case different to the previous one, but that's normal behaviour. When a table is deleted the corresponding "system name" is free to reuse for a new table, view or secondary index. This is the reason that when you now look again at the system table "/BI59807" you'll find another table or index under "alternative table name".
So up to now all seems to be O.K. I assume that you also copied the records from the saved table as described in point 7 and 8 of the note.
What's now missing are the indexes. As described in point 9 you can either restore the indexes if you saved them at point 2 or you can create them via SE11 or SE14.
Kind regards,
Gerhard Hoffmann
SAP Development Support on IBM i Systems

Performance issue in PS report

Experts!!
I've prepared a PS report that gives the cost status of an asset(under construction). It is a WBS element.
For this, I'm selecting all the projects(PROJ) as in selection criteria.
For each project, the hierarchy(all WBS elements of the project) with an FM.
With that, PRPS -> for WBS element details.
For some WBS elements, there could be asset numbers...means the asset is the WBS element
and the asset is under construction/ activity.
For those assets, I want to find the accounts data from BSEG(or some table).
Now this works fine output-wise.
But the problem is the poor performance.
When BSEG is accessed, I only have the asset number ANLN1(apart from bukrs/gjahr, which is of no great help).
I could not find an alternate table or a table where I can find the key(using the asset number) for BSEG.
Could someone help, please?
Thank you,
Santhosh.

Try this:
Go to FB03 and display one of the documents you are interested in.
Open another sessions and turn on the performance trace (ST05).
Go back to the document display and go:
Environment -> Document Environment -> Accounting documents.
Select the asset document.
Go back to ST05 and turn off the trace and display it.
That should show you how SAP does it. (My bet is that it is pretty close to what Eric has been saying.)
Rob

Query to group by based on partial count match

Dear experts,
Here is a challenge question.
I have a table a on Oracle 11i – this is how it is defined.
desc a
Name Null Type
STORE_NUMBER NOT NULL CHAR(9)
ASSORTMENT_NUMBER NOT NULL CHAR(9)
ITEM_NUMBER NOT NULL CHAR(9)
DESCRIPTION CHAR(1000)
UPC_CODE NOT NULL CHAR(15)
STOCK_FLAG CHAR(1)
AVG_RTL_PRICE CHAR(16)
SALES_MOVEMENT CHAR(16)
PROD_STYLE CHAR(50)
COLOR CHAR(50)
ATT_1 CHAR(50)
ATT_2 CHAR(50)
ATT_3 CHAR(50)
ATT_4 CHAR(50)
ATT_5 CHAR(50)
ATT_6 CHAR(50)
ATT_7 CHAR(50)
ATT_8 CHAR(50)
ATT_9 CHAR(50)
ATT_10 CHAR(50)
ATT_11 CHAR(50)
ATT_12 CHAR(50)
ATT_13 CHAR(50)
ATT_14 CHAR(50)
ATT_15 CHAR(50)
25 rows selected
Primary Key as Store_number, Assortment_number, item_number. Therefore, for a particular assortment number, one store will have no two records of the same item_number.
Now, I want to add some more custom conditions to my extract from this table; we are doing this manually on an xls file by applying some formula. Wondering if we can do this by a sql query.
Here are the conditions –
1.     From table a, for any particular assortment_number, count of items belonging to a store. E.g –
Count of items     Store_number
5     1011
7     1022
23     1033
12     1044
2.     This is more challenging. From table a, for stores with the same count of item_numbers, list down the store numbers which have the same count of items and same items in the set under them. E.g – as below.
Count of items     Store_number     Item_number     Match Indicator     Matching Stores
5     3     123|12|1234|12|1     N
5     24     123|123|123|123|123     Y     22|234
5     21     123|451|2341|234|5100     N
5     22     123|123|123|123|123     Y     24|234
5     456     123|12|1|2|3     N
5     234     123|123|123|123|123     Y     22|24
3     45     12|123|12     Y     222|150
3     432     21|34|56     Y     123
3     222     12|123|12     Y     45|150
3     123     21|34|56     Y     432
3 150 12|123|12 Y 45|222
The above table may get positions shifted to its left due to formatting.
Appreciate your time and effort.
Thank You.

create table tmp_storeaggbyitem as
select
ltrim(trim(a.store_number),0) as store,
ltrim(trim(a.item_number),0) as item
from guide_pog_item_mstr a
where ltrim(trim(a.assortment_number),0) = '25571'
)Sample data in the table looks like this -
Store          Item
49               59310
49               59315
49               59114
49               59295
63               59310
63               59315
63               59314
63               59308
138             59310
138             59315
138             59114
138             59295
174             8399
174             6132
174             6129
174             6137
174             6175
270             8399
270             6132
270             6129
270             6137
270             6175
343             8399
343             6132
343             6129
343             6137
343             6175Here is the result set I am looking for -
Store        Count of Items        Item                                                   Matching Stores
49                    4                 59310|59315|59114|59295                    49|138
63                    4                 59310|59315|59314|59308                    None
138                  4                 59310|59315|59114|59295                    49|138
174                  5                 8399|6132|6129|6137|6175                   174|270|343
270                  5                 8399|6132|6129|6137|6175                   174|270|343
343                  5                 8399|6132|6129|6137|6175                   174|270|343
.....Which version of the database are you using? The LISTAGG fucntuion (which is avaialble in Oracle 11.2, but not in 11.1) might be helpful here.
>
We are using Oracle Enterprise Edition 11.2.0.1.0 - 64 bit
Pl/Sql release 11.1.0.1.0
>
Why are you using the CHAR datatype instead of VARCHAR2? It may have nothing to do with this prolem, but it will cause other problems.
>
Agreed. I asked the same to my design team I inherited this table from. We are working out on the new table soon.
Thanks, Sanders.

PC00_m40_PFY

HI, when i am executing PC00_m40_PFY standard report in production server i am getting the below mention Dump..It is not showing selection-screnn also. It directly goes to dump. But it is working in Development server. pls kindly help on this issue.
Error Text: The current ABAp program "???????????????????????" has to be terminated because it has come across a statement that unfortunatly can not be executed .
the fallowing syntax error occured in program " H1NCEPF1" in include "PCPFYIN3" * in line 21.
In perform or call function 'IS_AFY_IMPLEMENTED" . the actual parameter "AF_SWITCH" is incompatible with the formal parameter "PV_AFY_SWITCH".
And I found in DEV server changes happend but those changes are not reflected in PRD. can any tell me why it was happend.
we are using same versions in Both the servers.

Hi
Is the value of PF no you are taking from cluster ?
Check 2 values of PF are in cluster?
If it is then modify the form where it is taking the values from cluster restrict it to take the value from infotype or alternate table.
Manoj Shakya.

Alternate table of AP_INVOICE_LINES_ALL in 11i

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for