Alternative User Fork of Wiki Pages (User Hierarchy Wiki?)

I am planning to create my own version of the Installation Wiki page. The current one is good, but I prefer a version that adds a few of the steps right in there and gives a few warnings. I can understand why the current maintainers like it the way it is.
Should I just grab the current wiki html source and post a revised version on my own web server (for others), too?
Or, would the arch wiki prefer to have (a few other users') alternative versions of the (Installation) page in some other obscure location on the arch wiki site, presumably under a user hierarchy, itself? in this case, I can presumably register a user account on the arch wiki and copy the existing wiki (though the wiki cannot fork pages, I believe). I was looking on the ArchWiki:Contributing page about whether arch endorses user hierarchies. (I don't want to contaminate the main wiki-address space.)
obviously, I am fine with whatever the preference is.
/iaw
Last edited by iaw4 (2015-03-18 23:34:26)

If I may inject some comments as a moderator. I agree with runical; the issue is purely that the one Arch forum moderators main charters is to to ensure that technical advise on the forums is applicable to Arch users. We don't want the confusion that ensues if something is only true if you are running "Manjaro Arch" or "ArchBang" or "Evo/lution" or whatever. Those distributions have, for various valid reasons, chosen to be different from Arch. It is they who are the experts in the difference, not us; that is why we ask people to take their questions to the forums of their respective distributions.
There is no animosity. There is no competition. It is about choice; we don't care what people choose or why they choose it. Proprietary, Free, Mostly Free, Friendly warm communities, rolling release, long term stability, easy to set up, infinitely customizable, whatever. Yes, we have better relationships with some of the distributions, and there are strained relationships with others. iaw4, I am sorry you felt "admonished". I really wish Jeff and everyone else over at Evo/lution the very best, it is just that it is a different distribution and they are the authority on their distribution, not us.

Similar Messages

User Hierarchy Without Attr. Relationship

All,
I have created an attribute relationship without exactly having attribute relationships in the order the hierarchy is created.
However, I do see some performance improvement when this hierarchy is used, compared to before when individual attributes were used in the same order.I just wanted to understand, what goes behind the scene when I am creating a User Hierarchy...and that too
with no attribute relationship(in that order).
Also, I don't see any size increase of the cube. Need to understand if this is actually helping, or just a co-incidence?
Thanks
Ayush

Hi Ayush,
According to your description, you created an attribute relationship without exactly having attribute relationships in the order the hierarchy is created. The strange thing is that there are some performance improvement when this hierarchy is used, right?
Generally, hierarchies in themselves dont help much in performance until we have the Attribute relationships set between them. So in your scenario, the Attribute relationships can be set automatically when creating hierarchy. Please ensure that in the
Attribute Relationships tab in Dimension design page.
Attribute relationships improve the performance of Analysis Services when aggregating data. When an attribute relationship is defined between levels of a hierarchy, the engine can use the aggregations of one level to calculate the aggregations of another
level, which is why you always receive a message that warns you to create those relationships.
https://www.simple-talk.com/sql/reporting-services/implementing-user-defined-hierarchies-in-sql-server-analysis-services/
Regards,
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

User hierarchy in LDAP

Hi
In the application we are developing, we need the reporting structure as represented by an orgchart. For any given users I should be able to find the users reporting to the given user.
How should I go about doing this.. so that I have an API to call from the application. Is there any such inherent support or will I have to build it?
I know I can set up the tree in ldap or just add a custom attribute that reflects the "report-to" for each user... but I'm not sure how to retrieve this info

Hello,
LDAP, as far as I know, is correctly configured. I'm able to assign human tasks properly to LDAP users, and send them email notifications (obtaining the email address automatically via LDAP).
The LDAP user I am using is in a user hierarchy, and has one user above him, but the getManager function (yes, I am using the ids:getManager function) doesn't recognize that hierarchy.
I have also tried with the identity lookup dialog. I find the user, select it, and click the reportees button, but it returns: ' No reportees for userName '
Thanks.

Creating a list in Pages with hierarchy

How do you create a list in Pages with hierarchy?

Hierarchy is just a matter of indent levels.
Pages works by example so having set up the initial one level list, hit a return after one of the points and tab to move to the next level.
Then apply settings in:
Format > Text > Bullets & Lists > to each level if it isn't already an indented List
You can save the final set of hierarchical list as a List Style for reuse.
Peter

Setup User Hierarchy in system-jazn-data file.

Hi All,
We are using the File Based Security Provider for the Human Workflow Tasks in BPEL 10.1.3.4.
How can we setup the Manager/Reportee Hierarchy in the system-jazn-data.xml file? I can see the user and role definitions there but I not see any kind of hierarchy in the file. Or is there some other file where this Hierarchy needs to be set up?

See ORACLE_HOME\bpel\system\services\config\demo-users-properties.xml
Heidi.

Determining organizational user hierarchy

Hi !
We have this scenario : one of our process lane belongs to a potential user that is an employee of an specific department of the company. This user will initiate the process by sending filling a form. Then, his/her manager should authorize that form.
Initially, the potential user and his/her department is not known, so neither is his/her manager, that should recieve a notificacion in the UWL.
Is there any standard way to specifiy in the UME how users are related (employee->manager->etc) to be able in runtime to determine who is the process initiator manager?
Thanks.
Regards,
Matias

Hi all,
If the standard attributes from UME are not sufficient you could come up with a custom EJB function that can be used in a mapping. For example getManager(String umeUserId) : String. This could then dynamically access your org hierarchy (whereever you maintained this) and resolve the manager for the userID that is passed as argument. The positive effect is that you can directly use this function in the potential owner determination (by choosing "use expression" instead of defining a "static" list of principals).
In case the EJB function is too complex you could stll go for an automated activity that invokes an existing backend services in your org management. the output of this should be a unique ID that is also known to the UME (which is the principal management on the CE system). Using this output in combination with the built-in "getPrincipal" functions in the mapping editor will do its job.
Maybe one of those suggestions fit to your needs.
Cheers,
Martin

STS user hierarchy connection

Hi,
i want to create a report (ABAP) that shows, which user has access to which node in a STS - hierarchy (like specified in transaction BPS_TC).
Is there a table where I can get the information from?
I couldn't find one so far...
Or is there some predefined ABAP/program/function module/whatever I can use?
We are using BW 3.0B with SEM-BW 3.1B.
Thanks for your reply.
Best regards
Steve

Hi Steve,
there's no straight table for this. It's stored as XML. Here's how to get it... for 10 points
REPORT z_test_sts.
DATA: application TYPE REF TO cl_ups_visualization.
DATA: l_teilplan TYPE ups_y_teilplan VALUE 'TMB'.
DATA: l_version TYPE ups_y_version VALUE '100'.
DATA: lt_tree TYPE ups_yt_treeview.
CREATE OBJECT application.
CALL METHOD application->invoke_sts
EXPORTING
    i_version     = l_version
    i_teilplan    = l_teilplan
EXCEPTIONS
    no_permission = 1
    no_attribute = 2
    OTHERS        = 3.
CALL METHOD application->load_hier
EXCEPTIONS
    no_hierarchy = 1.
CALL METHOD application->r_sts->fill_status_text.
CALL METHOD application->r_sts->load_links
EXPORTING
    i_version = application->version
    i_teilplan = application->teilplan.
CALL METHOD application->fill_laufzeit
EXCEPTIONS
    no_user = 1
    OTHERS = 2.
CALL METHOD application->fill_tree_laufzeit
EXPORTING
    i_user = sy-uname
IMPORTING
    et_tree = lt_tree
EXCEPTIONS
    no_user = 1
    OTHERS = 2.
* application->lt_screen
* application->lt_laufzeit "<<<< this is what you want
BREAK-POINT.
Regards
Marc
SAP NetWeaver RIG

Optimistic Locking - Specifying an alternative User message

Scenario...
User A selects a record
User B selects the same record
User A makes a change and commits/applies it
User B makes a change to the same record and ties to commit
Result...User B gets the following message...
Error in mru internal routine: ORA-20001: Error in MRU: row= 1, ORA-20001: ORA-20001: Current version of data in database has changed since user initiated update process. current checksum = "56693D48DF0C4F9D2A06AE5976FA6E8F", item checksum = "FC863259F75396F19D003B6B5E687758"., update "MAPOWN"."MAP_ALERT_LEVELS" set "MEASURE_ID" = :b1, "MEASURE_DESC" = :b2, "WARN_DFT" = :b3, "DANGER_DFT" = :b4, "WARN_TMP" = :b5, "DANGER_TMP" = :b6, "RECOMMENDATION" = :b7
PROBLEM
How do I capture this message and present a more user-friendly one??
regards
Paul P

Paul - I don't know of a way around this other than to code your own optimistic locking logic and raise/handle an exception before the automatic row processing process catches it.
Scott

Can I set up a master page to show custom alternating footer text dependant on page number?

Hi,
Is it possible to set up a master page to show different messages in the footer of a brochure dependant on page number? For example;
Page 1: Buy from us because...
Page 2: Our website address is...
Page 3: Here's a special offer...
Page 4: Our website address is...
Page 5: Buy from us because...
Page 6: Our website address is...
...and so on, repeating until the end of the brochure. The intention is for the footers to update automatically if the pagination of the brochure in question needs moving around - or if the messages need changing.
Thanks!

Thanks, but the text needs to be on a single master page which every page is assigned to. This is so the text alternates correctly regardless of whether new pages are inserted or moved. If I assigned separate master pages to individual pages and then moved the pages to a different location, the alternating footer text would then fall out of sync. I hope that made sense!

Support for alternating even/odd footers in Pages

I would love to be able to use Pages for sophisticated multiple-page documents, but I can't when the software is missing such basic capacities as the ability to create separate even/odd headers and footers.
How can we convince Apple that this and a handful of other features that are commonly used by document creators (and are key features of Microsoft Word) should be added back into the next update of Pages?

I don't know, how can we?
Just the list of what was removed from Pages '09 is over 100 features. That does not include the long list of outstanding features requested over the years.
Apple doesn't look like it is going to meet its own deadline for the extremely short list of feature reinstatements it announced last November.
Peter

User In Planning unit Hierarchy unable to see data form in editable mode

hi all,
we are facing a problem in planning unit hierarchy in Hyperion planning, where we have 4 users, Hierarchy is define as
hierarchy: budget approved
version: approved
Entity: Finance
Senario:Budget
haroon asghar ( owner)
adeel javid (Reviewer)
Naeem asghar (Reviewer)
Imtiaz (Reviewer)
Issue is that,after start the budget activity (promotional path) by Admin, the data form editable to Owner haroon asghar
but after completing his work by haroon,when he promote the planning unit ,the next user in Hierarchy "Adeel javid" unable to see data form in respective planning unit in uneditable data form not only for this user but all rest of the users as well,while i think data form should only uneditable(grayed) for user Haroon Asghar who promote the planning unit.
we have checked all security rights to the users those are "Write access" but still Adeel javid is unable to enter data,so the budget activity is stop due to this problem.
when i remove the planning unit then i log in with all user one by one and see all data form required version,scenario and entity were editable to all users mention above
we want to run budget activity with the above planning unit hierarchy.
plz any one provide the proposed solution of the said issue
we are using Product Version 11.1.2.0.00
Regards
Anwar

Reviewers will not be able to write data to the intersection. Reviewers can only review the data and follow-up with a Reject, Promote, Sign off, Delegate, Originate or Freeze.
Please refer Article ID 1226783.1 in MOS.
HTH-
Jasmine.

Control printing with ALTERNATIVE in several pages

Hello all,
I'm currently working on generating a PDF where each page needs to be conditional (ie user can print 1st & 2nd page, or 1st, 2nd & 3rd, or 1st & 3rd). Altogether there are about 20 pages.
The use of alternative + command with next page works great for the determining the print of the 2nd page, but I can't seem to get it to work the same for the printing of the 3rd page, etc. I did notice that in order for the contents of the 2nd page to print, they HAVE to be placed in a secondary window, but I can't put the next page commands in a secondary window. What I've tried is to have the secondary window first (with all the page content), then a main window (with alternatives & commands), but this doesn't seem to work. (Also, listing main widow then secondary doesn't work.)
When I add breakpoints, it seems as though the main window is never called. (I can see the breakpoints in the F01 include, but they are never called.)
Any ideas?
Here's what I'm needing:
Page 1
- alternative 1 -> TRUE -> go to page 2
- alternative 1 -> FALSE
--alternative 2 -> TRUE -> go to page 3
--alternative 2 -> FALSE
---alternative 3 -> TRUE -> go to page 4
Page 2
- alternative 1 -> TRUE ->go to page 3
- alternative 1 -> FALSE
--alternative 2 -> TRUE -> go to page 4
--alternative 2 -> FALSE
---alternative 3 -> TRUE -> go to page 5
Lisa
Edited by: Lisa Mychalishyn on Feb 2, 2012 4:13 PM

OK, here's the technique I used to make this work.
I pass a table with pages to be printed (PAGETAB). In the main window, I loop thru PAGETAB and use it's value to use the layout for that particular page (grouped into a folder, with conditions). At the end of the main window, I check to see if this the last page to be printed, else I use Command to force a page break (otherwise, 2 forms may print on the same page).
Here's a sample of the code:
Page
Main window
- program lines -> get total # lines in PAGETAB into V_TOTAL
- loop @ PAGETAB
-- program lines -> add 1 to V_LOOP
   -- folder 1 -> condition -> PAGETAB = "PAGE1"
    --- page 1 layout stuff
   --- alternative - if V_LOOP < V_TOTAL
TRUE
command -> go to next page -> Page
   -- folder 2 -> condition -> PAGETAB = "PAGE2"
     --- page 2 layout stuff
     --- alternative - if V_LOOP < V_TOTAL
TRUE
command -> go to next page = Page
... rest of pages
Lisa

How user experience leads to contract management success

You've likely heard a version of "Let's Call the Whole Thing Off, the song that made differences in pronunciation (e.g. toe-may-toe vs. toe-mah-toe) famous. This song is an important lesson in how people approach language and make it their own. While this freedom of interpretation is great for day-to-day conversation and musicals, it can prove disastrous when it comes to tagging standards for contract and document management. What you might call an agreement, another person might call a contract. Yikes.
Read More
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Tom,
I can address parts of your question, please see below:
How can you tell jdeveloper to use other custom roles?JDeveloper picks up users from the Integration Server connection. So, if the server is configured with the LDAP configured server, you will see users and groups from that registry. JDeveloper (the human task editor dialog) does not go directly against the LDAP.
I wonder if it is possible to define such an user hierarchy in LDAPYes. That is the way it has been designed.
I now you can create a role-based hierarchy, but in cases this will
be to much and you need user based hierarchy.Making a user specific hierarchy has problems - what if a user leaves the company? The role based hierarchies solve this problem very well. May be I misunderstand your question.
I will have a colleague, who works on identity management, look at your question.
Regards,
Sidda.

Re: query not appering in other user id

hi experts,
i have a problem i create a query for actual values by period by using quick viewer sqvi but the report can be see only by my userid so i am scad if i create the sqvi in production server that my userid only can see the others cannot.
so if anybody face the same problem give me your inputs.
thanks in advance,
kk.

Hi
Step 1 : Create User Group u2013 SQ03
Follow the menu path u2013 SAP Menu -> Tools -> ABAP Workbench -> Utilities -> SAP Query -> User Groups
a) In the User Group : Initial Screen -
- Enter User Group Code (self named)
- Click on u201CCreateu201D
b) In the User Group (Code) : Create or Change pop-up window -
- Enter the User Group Description
- Click on u201CSaveu201D
c) In the Create Object Directory Entry pop-up window -
- Click on u201CLocal Objectu201D button
- The User Group Created is Saved .
Step 2 : Create User Group u2013 SQ02
Follow the menu path u2013 SAP Menu > Tools > ABAP Workbench > Utilities > SAP Query > Infosets
a) In the Infoset : Initial screen -
- Enter Infoset Code (self named)
- Click on u201CCreateu201D button
b) In the Infoset : Title & Database Screen -
- Enter Description of Infoset in the u201CNameu201D field
- In the Data Source selection : Select appropriate Data Source by clicking the radio button
Source the data can either be multiple tables OR single table. There are 4 options for the user to select from
- Click on u201CContinueu201D (Enter)
- Selected Table gets displayed in the Infoset : Initial Screen
c) In the Infoset : Initial Screen -
- Click on u201CInsert Tableu201D button
d) In the Add Table Screen -
- Enter the Table Name that is to be inserted
- Click u201CContinueu201D (Enter)
e) In the Infoset: Initial Screen -
- Click on u201CBacku201D button
f) In the Field Group Defaults pop-up Screen -
- Select Appropriate Field Group Option by clicking on the radio button
There are 3 options to select from. User can select Empty Field Group option and then select the data fields in the steps explained further. Alternatively, User can select an option which clubs all the data fields from all the tables selected.
- Click u201CContinueu201D (Enter)
g) In the Change Infoset Screen -
The left side lists the Tables that the user has selected in step b, c & d
- In the right side, system creates field groups, one for each table listed in the left part. Initially, the Field Groups are empty.
- In the Left Side, Click on the arror next to the table name and expand and display all the data fields in the table.
- Select a Data Field from the expanded Table view, which is to be added to the Field Group on the right.
- Select a Field Group on the right side, in which Data Field selected above has to be added.
- Right click on the Data Field selected and click on u201CAdd Field to Field Groupu201D.
- The selected Data Field gets added to the selected Field Group, which is indicated by an arrow next to the Field Group.
- Carry out the steps above to add the required Data Fields to the respective Field Groups
- After transferring Data Fields to Field Groups click on u201CGenerateu201D button
h) In the Create Object Directory Entry Screen -
- Click on u201CLogical Objectu201D button to generate the infoset
i) In the Change Infoset Screen -
- Click on the u201CBacku201D button
j) User is taken back to the u201CInfoset: Initial Screenu201D which displays the created Infoset record.
Step 3 : Assigning User Group to Infoset u2013 SQ03
Follow the menu path u2013 SAP Menu -> Tools -> ABAP Workbench -> Utilities -> SAP Query -> User Groups
a) In the User Groups : Initial screen -
- Enter the User Group for which Infoset is to be assigned
- Click on u201CAssign Users & Infosetsu201D button
b) In the User Group: Assign Users Screen -
- Click on u201CAssign Infosetsu201D button
c) In the next screen, select the Infoset, which needs to be attached to the User Group selected
d) Click on the u201CBacku201D button
VVR

User login takes several minutes

Please let me know if anyone has experienced this issue or know how we can troubleshoot. We upgraded our BI Apps from 7.9.6 to 7.9.6.2. Following the upgrade, everything works fine but logging in using any user credentials can take several minutes.
This includes logging into Catalog Manager, logging into OBIEE dashboards using BI Server authentication, and logging in using the MS Office plug-in. It does not take a long time when using external table authentication. This makes me think it's an issue with BI server authentication and the RPD.
Does anyone know what may cause this problem? Oracle support has no clue so I thought I'd check with the OBIEE gurus on this forum. Thanks.

Yes I figured out the problem right before I read your message. Thank you.
For some reason the BI Apps 7.9.6.2 RPD enabled an init block that was not previously used in the out of the box 7.9.6. I just caught that it was enabled so tested out disabling it and it seems to have resolved the problem. The init block name is User Hierarchy Level
The log files did not show any errors despite increasing the login time by a few minutes.

Alternative User Fork of Wiki Pages (User Hierarchy Wiki?)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for