ANNOUNCEMENT: Headstart Utilities Patch 6.5.2.3 now available on Supplement Option!

All,
Subscribers of the Supplement Option can now download Headstart Patch 6.5.2.3 and Headstart for Apps patch 6.5.2.3
from My Oracle, using the iDevelopment Accelerators link in the Supplement Offering portlet.
The main purpose of this patch is to improve the performance of the CDM RuleFrame engine
when large transactions are involved.
During development and testing of this patch the following improvements of the CDM RuleFrame engine
were measured on an Windows 2000 laptop with RDBMS 8.1.7.1.1.
- 100 DML statements, 3 Business Rules per statement performance improved from 1.45 sec to 1.05 sec (28%)
- 500 DML statements, 3 Business Rules per statement performance improved from 23.760 sec to 8.48 sec (64%)
- 1000 DML statements, 3 Business Rules per statement performance improved from 78.79 sec to 19.260 sec (76%)
- 2000 DML statements, 3 Business Rules per statement performance improved from above 300 sec to 48.22 sec (83%)
- 5000 DML statements, 3 Business Rules per statement performance improved from ??? to 143.41 sec
It evolves that the RuleFrame engine takes up more time for larger transactions now in a rather linear way.
This means that within 15 minutes more than 100.000 business rules can be validated
on a small windows 2000 laptop.
Besides this performance improvement, the patch also implements the following enhancements to CDM RuleFrame:
- The utility 'Create CAPI Custom Service' makes it possible to include a CAPI Custom Service
(that is, your own package or function) in more than one CAPI
- The utility 'Create VAPI Definition' can now also create VAPI's for subtypes (controlled by new utility parameter)
Furthermore, several Utilities bugs have been fixed in this patch. See the readme in the patch for more details.
If you don't have the Supplement Option, contact your local Oracle Consulting representative.
For more information, read the original announcement of the Supplement Option in this forum at
Re: Archiving the data .
kind regards,
The Headstart Team.

I was running just the base version of Headstart until yesterday, when I applied all 3 patches at once. On the base version this column wasn't being included in the CAPI, and now it is, so I guess the change could've come about in any of the patches.
The name of my table is reg_photos, and the column that has Complete=No is large_image.
The specific areas of the CAPI where it's included and which cause compilation errors are:
There's public cursors at the start of the package where the column is being selected:
-- public cursors
-- cursor to select one particular row
cursor c_rpho
( b_project_code in varchar2
, b_photo_no in number
) is
select rpho.rowid the_rowid
, rpho.project_code
, rpho.photo_no
, rpho.photo_type
, rpho.photo_date
, rpho.small_image
, rpho.large_image
, rpho.created_by
, rpho.creation_date
, rpho.last_updated_by
, rpho.last_update_date
from reg_photos rpho
where rpho.project_code = b_project_code
and rpho.photo_no = b_photo_no
-- cursor to select all rows
cursor c_rpho_all
is
select rpho.rowid the_rowid
, rpho.project_code
, rpho.photo_no
, rpho.photo_type
, rpho.photo_date
, rpho.small_image
, rpho.large_image
, rpho.created_by
, rpho.creation_date
, rpho.last_updated_by
, rpho.last_update_date
from reg_photos rpho
It's also included in function get_char_value but this isn't causing a compilation error:
elsif upper(p_column_name) = 'LARGE_IMAGE'
then
return l_row.large_image;
And also in procedure validate_row:
g_current_ind.large_image := true;
I guess it's easy enough to go in and comment all the references out, but I would've thought that columns of this nature should not be included in the CAPI in the first place?
Thanks,
Kim.

Similar Messages

  • I: Patch 6.5.3.1 for 9i available via Supplement Option

    On headstart patch 6.5.3.0 (patch version ONLY for Oracle 9i Forms), there is a bug introduced in library qmslib65.pll
    How to reproduce
    ================
    - Start the headstart demo
    - From the menu open form Forms --> Project Business Rules
    - Press F8 (execute query)
    - Now you see project 1, without detail records(no employees)
    - Click on the item 'Employee' (first empty record)
    - Click on the item 'Name' of the Project in the master
    - Now message 'FRM-40202 Field must be entered' appears
    Location of the problem
    =======================
    QMSLIB65.pll qms$context package body
    contains the following code:
    . -- fix 6.5.3.0
    . if get_record_property(name_in('system.cursor_record')
    . ,name_in('system.cursor_block'),STATUS) = 'NEW'
    . then
    . set_record_property(name_in('system.cursor_record')
    . ,name_in('system.cursor_block'),STATUS,INSERT_STATUS);
    . end if;
    . -- end fix 6.5.3.0
    This piece of code should be deleted completely
    Fix
    ===
    This problem has been fixed in patch 6.5.3.1 for Headstart for Oracle 9i Forms. This patch is downloadable from the Supplement Option web site.
    Kind Regards, Marc Vahsen
    Headstart Team

    I think I've found a bug in this release: If you have an LOV defined on a report parameter (with value and description), the when-validate-item trigger of the field will validate the description against the LOV. It adds the following code to the validation query: ||l_where_and || l_description_column || ' = ' || '''' || name_in (qms0012f.get_param_description_item(p_block_name))||''''
    Th descriptor column in this case is the alias (= "description"). However, you cannot use column aliases in a where-clause. This will never work!!
    Is there a fix for this problem?

  • ANNOUNCE: JRockit R25.2.1 now available on dev2dev

    JRockit R25.2.1, the first rolling patch for R25.2, is now available on dev2dev.
    This version fixes two customer problems as well as a problem with the Memory Leak Detector's allocation stack traces. If you are experience the problems mentioned on the web page, or are using the Memory Leak Detector, you should upgrade to the new version.
    The binaries, as well as information regarding the rolling patch, can be downloaded at http://dev2dev.bea.com/wljrockit/r25_2_1/.
    Mathias Axelsson
    Release Manager

    Hi!
    For Linux x64, you can download the R25.2.0 version now. The reason it wasn't made available at the time we released R25.2.0 was because the testing on RHEL 4.0 QU1 wasn't finished. We updated the page a couple of weeks later when the testing was done.
    If you go to http://commerce.bea.com/products/weblogicjrockit/5.0/jr_50.jsp, you can download the 64-bit version of JRockit for EM64T and AMD64. Here is the direct link to the JDK download:
    http://download2.bea.com/pub/jrockit/50/jrockit-25.2.0-jdk1.5.0_03-linux-x64.bin

  • Headstart Utilities Failure w/Designer 6.0

    Hello:
    I've just tried to install Headstart 2.1.2 with the new patches
    for Designer 6/Developer 6 on Windows NT 4.0 SP 4. I've checked
    all of the logs (in my ORANT\HSD21 folder) and I don't see any
    errors in any of them.
    However, when I go to start the Headstart Utilities
    Administration and log in as the Headstart Utilities owner, I
    get the following:
    I get a number of "FRM-40733: PL/SQL built-in DBMS_ERROR_TEXT
    failed". This comes up 5 times in a row.
    Then I get "FRM-40735: PRE-FORM trigger raised unhandled
    exception ORA-03114". This comes up once, and the form exits.
    This last one seems to indicate that the logon has failed, but I
    can log on using SQLPlus 3.3 and SQLPlus 8.0 with no problems,
    using exactly the same ID/password.
    If it matters, I'm using Oracle 8.1.5.0.0, Developer 6.0
    downloaded from Technet with the dev60 patches and Designer 6.0
    with no additional patches. They all seem to be working OK
    (I've generated a test form w/o Headstart and it runs OK).
    I've also run the following as suggested in another of your
    posts:
    select object_name from user_objects where status='INVALID';
    which returns no rows.
    Help!!
    TIA
    Eric Raskin
    null

    Headstart Team (guest) wrote:
    : Jeff Esposito (guest) wrote:
    : : Headstart Team (guest) wrote:
    : : : Eric Raskin (guest) wrote:
    : : : : Headstart Team (guest) wrote:
    : : : : : Eric Raskin (guest) wrote:
    : : : : : : Hello:
    : : : : : : I've just tried to install Headstart 2.1.2 with the
    new
    : : : : patches
    : : : : : : for Designer 6/Developer 6 on Windows NT 4.0 SP 4.
    : I've
    : : : : : checked
    : : : : : : all of the logs (in my ORANT\HSD21 folder) and I
    don't
    : : see
    : : : : any
    : : : : : : errors in any of them.
    : : : : : : However, when I go to start the Headstart Utilities
    : : : : : : Administration and log in as the Headstart Utilities
    : : owner,
    : : : : I
    : : : : : : get the following:
    : : : : : : I get a number of "FRM-40733: PL/SQL built-in
    : : : : : DBMS_ERROR_TEXT
    : : : : : : failed". This comes up 5 times in a row.
    : : : : : : Then I get "FRM-40735: PRE-FORM trigger raised
    : : unhandled
    : : : : : : exception ORA-03114". This comes up once, and the
    form
    : : : : exits.
    : : : : : : This last one seems to indicate that the logon has
    : : failed,
    : : : : but
    : : : : : I
    : : : : : : can log on using SQLPlus 3.3 and SQLPlus 8.0 with no
    : : : : problems,
    : : : : : : using exactly the same ID/password.
    : : : : : : If it matters, I'm using Oracle 8.1.5.0.0, Developer
    : 6.0
    : : : : : : downloaded from Technet with the dev60 patches and
    : : Designer
    : : : : 6.0
    : : : : : : with no additional patches. They all seem to be
    : working
    : : OK
    : : : : : : (I've generated a test form w/o Headstart and it runs
    : : OK).
    : : : : : : I've also run the following as suggested in another
    of
    : : your
    : : : : : : posts:
    : : : : : : select object_name from user_objects where
    : : : : status='INVALID';
    : : : : : : which returns no rows.
    : : : : : : Help!!
    : : : : : : TIA
    : : : : : : Eric Raskin
    : : : : : Eric,
    : : : : : I'm sorry to say I have bad news for you. The error you
    : run
    : : : : into
    : : : : : is caused by the following bug in Forms 6.0, which only
    : : : : : reproduces with Oracle 8.1.5 on NT:
    : : : : : 966970: CONNECTION LOST WHEN INVOKING PACKAGED
    PROCEDURE
    : : WITH
    : : : : : PLSQL-TABLE AS ARG OFMO899
    : : : : : Only work around is to use 8.0.5, or 8.1.5 on a UNIX
    : : machine.
    : : : : You ain't kiddin' about the "bad news" part, are you?
    : : Just
    : : : : to be sure I understand, this is only on the development
    : : : : machines, right? I can still run 8.1.5 on NT for the
    : actual
    : : : : database?
    : : : : Eric
    : : : I wish I was kidding! This is a problem you might run into
    on
    : : : your production database as well. The moment you have a
    forms
    : 6
    : : : application that calls a server-side procedure which has a
    : : PL/SQL
    : : : table of records as parameter, the connection is lost.
    : : : Headstart-generated applications will all run into this, as
    : : : Headstart uses such a server-side procedure for message
    : : : handling.
    : : : We have raised this issue with Forms Development, and have
    : : asked
    : : : for a patch. (although it might turn out to be a server bug
    : : : instead of a forms bug...).
    : : This is very bad news, as I was looking to leverage
    : : headstart with 8.1.5/Designer/Developer 6.0 for rapid
    : development
    : : and deployment of an application to the web.
    : : I'm sure there are a few of us in this boat.
    : : Questions:
    : : 1) Does this problem exist for 8.1.5 in a Unix deployment?
    : : Specifically, can I be assured of reliable forms generation
    via
    : : headstart if my 8.1.5 database lives in Unix?
    : : 2) Assuming Forms Development agrees with you and is working
    on
    : a
    : : patch, may I offer to help test that patch?
    : : Jeff
    : Jeff,
    : This is only a problem with Oracle 8i on NT. Note that it is
    not
    : just a Headstart problem. If you generate a form with Designer,
    : and the block is based on a MAPI procedure, it won't run on
    8.1.5
    : on NT either, because the MAPI procedure has a PL/SQL table of
    : records as a parameter, just like the Headstart message
    handling
    : routine. Thanks for your offer, but given the wide impact of
    this
    : bug, Oracle will be able to create sufficient testcases
    : themselves.
    Hello,
    does the same problem exist on Oracle 8.0.5 on Windows NT and/or
    Digital Unix too?
    We are currently thinking about using Headstart and if the
    problem exists on 8.0.5 the workaround you provided might be a
    big problem for us ...
    thx in advance
    null

  • Unhandled exception when starting headstart utilities 6i

    Installed Designer 6i (4.1.1), Developer patch 7, Headstart 6.5.
    Try to launch Headstart utilities, logon, get the context workarea question. Choose the only one we've got, and get error message:
    Unhandled exception in SET_CONTEXT_WORKAREA:ORA-4020:deadlock detected while trying to lock object HSU65.BLAPI, trg block: WKA, trg item:WKA.
    CONTEXT_WORKAREA_IRID
    Anyone any ideas?
    Thanks!

    Ernst,
    Did you recently upgrade your Oracle Designer version?
    You probably have to re-run the grants script, that grants access on Repository objects to the Utilities owner.
    To do this, log on to SQL*Plus as the Oracle Repository Owner, and run the following script, located
    in the [Headstart Home]\hsu\scripts directory, with the following command line parameters.
    d6grtsyn.sql [Headstart Home] [Utilities Owner schema name]
    for example:
    d6grtsyn.sql c:\hsd65 hsua65
    SQL*Plus will be closed automatically. The log file d6grtsyn.log will be created in the Headstart Home.
    Check this log file for any errors.
    kind regards,
    Sandra

  • DBMS_ERROR_TEXT failure with Headstart Utilities Admin form

    I have installed the Headstart Oracle Designer for Designer/Developer 6.0, following instructions found in the patch for 6.0. Whenever I try to start the Headstart Utilities Administration form, I get an error stating that DBMS_ERROR_TEXT failed. Has anyone else had this problem?

    Janine,
    When I run the Utilities Administration against an Oracle 8.1.6.1.0 database on Sun Solaris, I don't have any problems.
    Can you run other Headstart generated applications on this database, like the Headstart Demo or the Foundation Application? In other words, is it only the Utilities Admin that gives the error?
    regards, Sandra

  • ORA-20998: Transaction Failed on Headstart Utilities 6.5 installation

    Hello,
    I am having problem when running insthsu.sql script to install
    Headstart utilities 6.5. We are doing client/server approach. The
    server is Sun 450 - Oracle 8.1.7.0.0
    Designer 6i Release 4 repository was installed on the server.
    How far was the installation:
    1. Installed HST65 --> No problem found
    2. Installed HDEMO65 --> No problem found
    3. Failed on the following statement on insthsu.sql script:
    ... installing Quality Check utilities
    execute hsu_qa_app.install;
    error message:
    hsu65@devl> execute hsu_qa_app.install
    BEGIN hsu_qa_app.install; END;
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-20998: Transaction Failed
    ORA-06512: at "HST65.QMS$ERRORS", line 128
    ORA-06512: at "HST65.QMS_TRANSACTION_MGT", line 814
    ORA-06512: at "HSU65.CG$AIS_HSU_UTILITIES", line 39
    ORA-04088: error during execution of
    trigger 'HSU65.CG$AIS_HSU_UTILITIES'
    ORA-06512: at "HSU65.HSU_INSTALL", line 132
    ORA-06512: at "HSU65.HSU_QA_APP", line 40
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    Any idea or direction where should I go from here?
    Thanks,
    Sanny Subowo

    Ali,
    You are running into a bug in the install form. It sees the tables that you imported manually (like the message told you to do), and then complains about them. The best thing to do is change the code in the hsdinst.fmb where the check for existing objects is performed in program units CHECK_USERS:
    function hsu_objects_exist
    return boolean
    is
    cursor c_chk
    is
    select 'x'
    from user_objects
    where object_name like 'BL_%'
    -- or object_name like 'HSU_%'
    -- or object_name like 'OMR_%'
    So comment out the two lines as indicated above and recreate the fmx.
    Kind regards,
    Peter

  • Error on HSU_OUTPUT dir when using Headstart Utilities

    Hi all,
    Does anyone have experience with the following problem: when I try to run the Headstart Utilities - Quality checks (elements) - Functions check, I get the following error:
    "Could not create file, possibly because output-directory does not exist. Check output directory in Windows Registry (HSU_OUTPUT)"
    My Registry has the following entry:
    Local Machine\Software\Oracle\Headstart
    which contains keys named HSU_OUTPUT, HTML_BROWSER and IMAGEFILE_PATH.
    So the entry seems to be OK, it refers to an existing dir, what's the problem?
    Regards, Ronald
    P.S. The other checks are working fine, I used entities, sequences and domains without a problem.

    Sandra,
    I've tried to reproduce the error I got in the beginning, but now I'm getting a database error (ORA-02291: integrity constraint (HSU21.HSU_QAR_USE_FK1) violated - parent key not found) While I was looking into that I noticed the following:
    In the package procedure HSU_QA_FUN.run there's a call to HSU_QA.INIT. In the INIT-call the user-id (3rd arg) is hard coded to be 1. In the HSU_QA_ENT.run the call is used with p_use_id, which I would expect te be correct. I noted that in the installation scripts the code is the same, so it's not a change we made.
    My question is: is there to be a pre-defined user in HSU_USERS with user-id 1? Or should the '1' in the call to init be changed into p_use_id, like in HSU_QA_ENT?
    Thanks for your help,
    Ronald

  • Headstart utilities (Find Window)

    I have used the HeadStart Utilities - Create Find Windows on my
    module, which has only one module component (SOT).
    I run the Create Find Windows utility and get the following
    error:
    "CDA-01151: Bound Item (Module Unit
    2554971643047902815540063643913191820, Name ID): Cannot set
    UPDATE_FLAG - the Column is in a non-updateable Constraint"
    Headstart utilities : Revision 6.5.0.1
    I tried different module and it was the same thing.
    I would like to know the reason.
    Regards

    I'm not sure, but probably there are bound items in your
    component, which are in a not updatable constraint, such as a
    primary key which can't be updated, or foreign keys, etc.
    Try setting these to updatable, and if necessary, after the
    utility back. Why it doesn't work as it is, I don't know either.
    Regards
    Jessica

  • Changes to tables not being picked up by certain Headstart Utilities

    I modified an existing table in our repository by adding a new column to the table. This column has the same properties as another column in the table. The Headstart utility 'Maintain Default Events For Entities' had been run for all tables before the new column was added. As expected, all the columns in the table had UPDATE events created for them, except of course the new column.
    As none of the events associated with this table had been used, I ran the 'Cleanup Unused Event for Entities' utility for the table and then re-ran the 'Maintain Default Events For Entities' utility for the table, in order to create an UPDATE event on the new column. This however, was not the case as an UPDATE event was not created for the new column. It appears to have been completely ignored.
    I have checked for the obvious i.e. was the table change applied properly in the repository and had the database been properly re-generated from the server model and everything appears to be correct.
    I have noticed that certain Headstart utilities, 'Enforce CDM Ordering Standard for columns' and 'Set column display length' do pick up the new columns. 'Enforce CDM Ordering Standard For Attributes' however, is another utility that does not pick up the new column.
    Any solutions and explanations for the above would be much appreciated.
    Thank You,
    Aneesha.
    null

    Aneesha,
    In your formulation of the problem, you seem to sometimes be using the terms "table" and "column" when you actually mean "entity" and "attribute". This makes it a bit hard for me to reconstruct your steps. Did you create both a new attribute on the entity, and a new column on the table, and are the two linked together (i.e. if you go to the attribute, is the "Implemented by Columns" node filled correctly?
    Kind regards,
    Peter
    null

  • Problems saving results of Headstart Utilities Journalling

    Unique key conflict when re-using Utility Maintain journal tables.
    We experience the same problems.
    Colum names are not too long.
    We are working with an unversioned repository and Headstart Utilities 6.0.5.4
    Als the Static Domain rules utility is not able to update prior generated Triggers.
    Workaround is to drop the previously generated triggers!
    However, this workaround is not an option for the Journal tables, because Module table usages are referencing this table.
    Please let us know as soon as possible.
    Joep

    Unique key conflict when re-using Utility Maintain journal tables.
    We experience the same problems.
    Colum names are not too long.
    We are working with an unversioned repository and Headstart Utilities 6.0.5.4
    Als the Static Domain rules utility is not able to update prior generated Triggers.
    Workaround is to drop the previously generated triggers!
    However, this workaround is not an option for the Journal tables, because Module table usages are referencing this table.
    Please let us know as soon as possible.
    Joep

  • Announcement : New SPS Patch Release (v 6.0.3) Now Available

    A newer release of Service Provisioning System (version 6.0.3) is now available for download on sunsolve
    The Release Notes for this release are available here and is a good place to start.
    {color:#0000ff}*You are strongly encouraged to go through the Release Notes AND the README instructions of all the patches thoroughly before starting your patch installations.*{color}
    The following are the key changes that were incorporated in this release.
    1) A fix in the SPS transport layer code was implemented to provide performance optimization of deployment jobs over a raw, SSH or SSL connection. Specifically, customers using an SSL connection between MS and the RA/LD nodes can observe noticeable performance improvements while deploying large payloads.
    2) A fix was also added to correct the default database encoding for customers who want to use extended ASCII character sets. This would not only facilitate clean database migration between 5.2 to 6.0 of any UTF-8 characters, but also ensure data integrity on fresh 6.0 installation. It's strongly recommended that customers take necessary steps to apply this fix on their SPS 6.0 installations.
    3) Certain GUI related      bugs were fixed and some missing functionality was added back.
    4) It is to be noted that this is a cumulative patch on top of the earlier patch release version 6.0.2. Hence all the bug fixes that were delivered with the 6.0.2 patch are also accumulated into the 6.0.3 patch
    5) Response time of GUI login validation has been improved.

    another option would be to make either the n1sps export not writing explicit end tags
    <element />
    instead of
    <element></element>
    or
    making the import / schema a bit less sensitive about whitespace within elements. The current bug, that you cannot export the xml, reformat in netBeans and then re-import is extremely annoying.

  • Announcement Oracle9iAS Portal Patch Release 3.0.9.8.3 For Solaris is now available

    Oracle9iAS Portal Patch Release 3.0.9.8.3 For Solaris is now available for download from metalink. Bugnumber for the patch release is 2131815.
    You must install this patch release over an Oracle9iAS 1.0.2.2 installation of Oracle9iAS Portal. You can install it over either a production installation (3.0.9.8.0) or a patched installation (3.0.9.8.1, 3.0.9.8.2). This patch release is cumulative and it incorporates the changes from the earlier patches (3.0.9.8.1, 3.0.9.8.2). The installation instructions are in README.TXT and RELNOTES.HTM contained in the patch release.
    The patch will be available for other platforms by the end of May.

    I saw this warning in the content area API home page.
    Warning - The Content Area APIs available in 3.0.8.x and 3.0.9.x will not work with Oracle9iAS Portal 9.0.2. They are not available with this release
    Will there be other API's?
    Are you removing the concept of loading an item through APIs?
    Thanks in advance
    Harish

  • Oracle SQL Developer 1.2 Patch 1 (1.2.1.32.00) is Now available

    Hi,
    <p>I have just posted the announcement that the latest patch release for SQL Developer is now available. The updated Check for Updates should be available from 1pm PST (16 Aug). So if you are ahead of the game, please give this another hour.
    <p>The Check for Updates does an automatic restart of SQL Developer, but you still need to do a second restart or you will not see the SQL Worksheet.
    <p>Finally we have updated the Statement of Direction with the main themes we plan to address in the next release.
    <p>For all document and download links, please see the main SQL Developer page on OTN.
    <p>Regards
    Sue

    Hi,
    <p>I have just posted the announcement that the latest patch release for SQL Developer is now available. The updated Check for Updates should be available from 1pm PST (16 Aug). So if you are ahead of the game, please give this another hour.
    <p>The Check for Updates does an automatic restart of SQL Developer, but you still need to do a second restart or you will not see the SQL Worksheet.
    <p>Finally we have updated the Statement of Direction with the main themes we plan to address in the next release.
    <p>For all document and download links, please see the main SQL Developer page on OTN.
    <p>Regards
    Sue

  • Downloaded Reader XI and started to recieve error 40000015, found the fourm with the patch to the registery fix, now it tells me unable to connect to the server. To many bugs with the reader, how do reinstall an older version?

    downloaded Reader XI and started to recieve error 40000015, found the fourm with the patch to the registery fix, now it tells me unable to connect to the server. To many bugs with the reader, how do reinstall an older version?
    I click on the launcher and nothing happens, 15 min later it will tell cant connect to the server.
    My computer is a windows 8.1; 64 bit operating system. I am stationed in South Korea, but that should not affect the program. Help please.
    John

    Hi johnd83157268,
    Sorry for the inconvenience that has caused to you.
    Could you please let me know what changes have you made in the registry.
    You might need to uninstall Adobe Reader from Control Panel and try install it again from the following link:
    Adobe Reader Install for all versions
    Please ensure that you are logged in as administrator and anti-virus is disabled as that might interrupt installation.
    Try again and then let me know.
    Regards,
    Anubha

Maybe you are looking for