Another PGC Data Rate Error

Hi,
Like a few others out there, I've been having a "PGC Data rate too high, please switch with lower data rate" problem for a few weeks now. I've been searching online for the past week and a half for a solution and have tried everything suggested, from changing the transcoding max bitrates (down to 5.0) and lowering the audio bitrate, to recompressing, and reencoding the said video file that is having problems. I removed this certain video from my project and built it without any problems which leads me to believe that this one video is the culprit. No matter what I've tried, I still get the same message although the time of error varies by a second or two. Is there any other help someone may be able to offer about the subject? Thanks.
Leighton

Leighton.
This sounds like a somewhat esoteric way to do the conversions IMHO.
It is possible the total combined data rates do exceed - but in EncoreDVD 2 this is a warning more than anything else.
I got these when running HIgh Bitrate MPEG-2 CBR encoded files along with PCM audio - I ignored the warning & built the disc anyway. It worked just fine.
Bitrates in question were 8,000 for video & 1536 for Audio.
Within specs. The little yellow triangle triangle with an exclamation mark was clearly visible in the timeline, so I used the "Ignore warnings & build anyway" option as I knew it was "in-spec".
Can you please let us know some details about the project:
1 - Source of files
2 - Bitrates encoded
3 - Audio type
etc.
I wonder - and hopefully someone can confirm one way or the other - if Encore sets the limit for this warning from the setting made in preferences about the maximum bitrate?

Similar Messages

PGC DATA RATE CS5

Hi,
I have a issue when trying to burn a dvd with encore cs5, I get a error message before the burning process.
PGC "sequence 1" has an error at 01:12:43:03.
The data rate of this file is to high for DVD. You must replace the file of a lower data rate.
This is my work flow
Footage is XDCAM EX 1440x1080/50i 25fps pal widescreen.
in premiere I use the direct export setting to Mpeg-2 dvd. settings as in attached image. Once exported, I close premiere, open encore, import the video and audio file and place on the timeline, make chapters ect. press build, and before burn. ERROR.

There were what I called "persistent" pgc errors in CS3 - meaning that even with good workflow, some users got pgc errors that could not be solved but, in most instances, could be worked around.
Such errors have not occurred in CS4 or CS5. A pgc error in CS4 or CS5 is usually more specific (the data rate message for example).
FYI, I got the pgc errors in CS3. I still have not upgraded my PC, but finally loaded CS4 to test an issue. No pgc error in a project that had one in CS3.
So I agree you should be looking for pgc errors only in CS4 or CS5, or that include the data rate message.
But Jon nailed this I suspect!

Another Data Rate Too High Error Question

Hi all,
I have seen quite a few posts about pgc errors, but most of them deal with slideshows and not video; and I can't find anything with the REF=KApgc error.
I'm just putting all of my home movies onto an authored DVD, not rocket science. I'm using the 'Film Submenu' preset with only 5 main movies, things like Easter, Birthday, etc. My transition for each button is a slate (for lack of a better word) that says exactly what it is and when it happened, before each movie plays.
After I had everything set up, I realized I didn't have an ability to "play all" that would include these slates. Simple solution, make a 'play all' button that links to a timeline that has everything in it - the slate, then the movie, next slate, next movie and so on. (When I say movie - they are all .mov files rendered out from After Effects, even the slates)
My transcode settings are NTSC DV High Quality 7mb VBR 2 Pass and the "maximum quality" box is checked.
When I run the 'Check Disc' all is fine. Preview the disc, all is fine.
Build Disc: Hours of Transcoding then the error: Data Rate Too High at *timecode* REF=KApgc.
When this movie is by itself with a button click, it's fine. It's only in the "play all" timeline that it produces the error.
If the data rate isn't too high in one place, why is it too high in another? It's the same thing, just a longer timeline.
Please Help!
Thanks.

Thanks Jeff,
I feel kind of silly for not thinking of that as a solution to my play all dilemma. That's why you're the expert I guess.
A better solution would be to create a playlist of all of your other timelines; that way, only one copy of each gets burned to disc.
Hopefully the "data rate" error will go away with these changes.
-Jeff
Can I place my slates that are just assets (.mov) in the playlist or can I only put timelines in there?
Thanks again,
-Jim

PGC has an error--data rate of this file is too high for DVD

Getting one of those seemingly elusive PGC errors, though mine seems to be different from many of the ones listed here. Mine is telling me that the data rate of my file is too high for DVD. Only problem is, the file it's telling me has a datarate that is too high, is a slideshow which Encore has built using imported jpg files. I got the message, tried going into the slideshow and deleting the photo at the particular spot in the timeline where it said it had the problem, now getting the same message again with a different timecode spot in the same slideshow. The pictures are fairly big, but I assumed that Encore would automatically resize them to fit an NTSC DVD timeline. Do I need to open all the pictures in Photoshop and scale them down to 720x480 before I begin with the slideshows?

With those efforts, regarding the RAM, it would *seem* that physical memory was not the problem.
I'd look to how Windows is managing both the RAM addresses and also its Virtual Memory. To the former, I've seen programs/Processes that lock certain memory addresses upon launch (may be in startup), and do not report this to Windows accurately. Along those lines, you might want to use Task Manager to see what Processes are running from startup on your machine. I'll bet that you've got some that are not necessary, even if IT is doing a good job with the system setup. One can use MSCONFIG to do a trial of the system, without some of these.
I also use a little program, EndItAll2 for eliminating all non-necessary programs and Processes, when doing editing. It's freeware, has a tiny footprint and usually does a perfect job of surveying your running programs and Processes, to shut them down. You can also modify its list, incase it wants to shut down something that IS necessary. I always Exit from my AV, spyware, popup-blocker, etc., as these progams will lie to EndItAll2 and say that they ARE necessary, as part of their job. Just close 'em out in the Tasktray, then run EndItAll2. Obviously, you'll need to do this with the approval of IT, but NLE machines need all available resources.
Now, to the Virtual Memory. It is possible that Windows is not doing a good job of managing a dynamic Page File. Usually, it does, but many find there is greater stability with a fixed size at about 1.5 to 2.5x the physical RAM. I use the upper end with great results. A static Page File also makes defragmenting the HDD a bit easier too. I also have my Page File split over two physical HDD's. Some find locating to, say D:\ works best. For whatever reason, my XP-Pro SP3 demanded that I have it on C:\, or split between C:\ and D:\. Same OS on my 3 HDD laptop was cool having it on D:\ only. Go figure.
These are just some thoughts.
Glad that you got part of it solved and good luck with the next part. Since this seems to affect both PrPro and En, sounds system related.
Hunt
PS some IT techs love to add all sorts of monitors to the computers, especially if networkded. These are not usually bad, but are usually out of the mainstream, in that most users will never have most of these. You might want to ask about any monitors. Also, are you the only person with an NLE computer under the IT department? In major business offices, this often happens. Most IT folk do not have much, if any, experience with graphics, or NLE workstations. They spend their days servicing database, word processing and spreadsheet boxes.

PGC...data rate too high

Hallo,
message
nunew33, "Mpeg not valid error message" #4, 31 Jan 2006 3:29 pm describes a certain error message. The user had problems with an imported MPEG movie.
Now I receive the same message, but the MPEG that is causing the problem is created by Encore DVD itself!?
I am working with the german version, but here is a rough translation of the message:
"PGC 'Weitere Bilder' has an error at 00:36:42:07.
The data rate of this file is too high for DVD. You must replace the file with one of a lower data rate. - PGC Info: Name = Weitere Bilder, Ref = SApgc, Time = 00:36:42:07"
My test project has two menus and a slide show with approx. 25 slides and blending as transition. The menus are ok, I verified that before.
First I thought it was a problem with the audio I use in the slide show. Because I am still in the state of learning how to use the application, I use some test data. The audio tracks are MP3s. I learned already that it is better to convert the MP3s to WAV files with certain properties.
I did that, but still the DVD generation was not successful.
Then I deleted all slides from the slide show but the first. Now the generation worked!? As far as a single slide (an image file) can not have a bitrate per second, and there was no sound any more, and as far as the error message appears AFTER the slide shows are generated, while Encore DVD is importing video and audio just before the burning process, I think that the MPEG that is showing the slide show is the problem.
But this MPEG is created by Encore DVD itself. Can Encore DVD create Data that is not compliant to the DVD specs?
The last two days I had to find out the cause for a "general error". Eventually I found out that image names must not be too long. Now there is something else, and I still have to just waste time for finding solutions for apparent bugs in Encore DVD. Why doesn't the project check find and tell me such problems? Problem is that the errors appear at the end of the generation process, so I always have to wait for - in my case - approx. 30 minutes.
If the project check would have told me before that there are files with file names that are too long, I wouldn't have had to search or this for two days.
Now I get this PGC error (what is PGC by the way?), and still have no clue, cause again the project check didn't mention anything.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Christian Kirchhoff

Hallo,
thanks, Ruud and Jeff, for your comments.
The images are all scans of ancient paintings. And they are all rather dark. They are not "optimized", meaning they are JPGs right now (RGB), and they are bigger then the resolution for PAL 3:4 would require. I just found out that if I choose "None" as scaling, there is no error, and the generation of the DVD is much, much faster.
A DVD with a slide show containing two slides and a 4 second transition takes about 3 minutes to generate when the scaling is set to something other than "None". Without scaling it takes approx. 14 seconds. The resulting movies size is the same (5,35 MB).
I wonder why the time differs so much. Obviously the images have to be scaled to the target size. But it seems that the images are not scaled only once, that those scaled versions of the source images are cached, and those cached versions are used to generate then blend effect, but for every frame the source images seem to be scaled again.
So I presume that the scaling - unfortunately - has an effect on the resulting movie, too, and thus influences the success of the process of DVD generation.
basic situation:
good image > 4 secs blend > bad image => error
variations:
other blend times don't cause an error:
good image > 2 secs blend > bad image => success
good image > 8 secs blend > bad image => success
other transitions cause an error, too:
good image > 4 secs fade to black > bad image => error
good image > 4 secs page turn > bad image => error
changing the image order prevents the error:
bad image > 4 secs blend > good image => success
changing the format of the bad image to TIFF doesn't prevent the error.
changing colors/brightness of the bad image: a drastic change prevents the error. I adjusted the histogram and made everything much lighter.
Just a gamma correction with values between 1.2 and 2.0 didn't help.
changing the image size prevents the error. I decreased the size. The resulting image was still bigger than the monitor area, thus it still had to be scaled a bit by Encore DVD, but with this smaller version the error didn't occur. The original image is approx. 2000 px x 1400 px. Decreasing the size by 50% helped. Less scaling (I tried 90%, 80%, 70% and 60%, too) didn't help.
using a slightly blurred version (gaussian blur, 2 px, in Photoshop CS) of the bad image prevents the error.
My guess is that the error depends on rather subtle image properties. The blur doesn't change the images average brightness, the balance of colors or the size of the image, but still the error was gone afterwards.
The problem is that I will work with slide shows that contain more images than two. It would be too time consuming to try to generate the DVD over and over again, look at which slide an error occurs, change that slide, and then generate again. Even the testing I am doing right now already "ate" a couple of days of my working time.
Only thing I can do is to use a two image slide show and test image couple after image couple. If n is the number of images, I will spend (n - 1) times 3 minutes (which is the average time to create a two slides slide how with a blend). But of course I will try to prepare the images and make them as big as the monitor resolution, so Encore DVD doesn't have to scale the images any more. That'll make the whole generation process much shorter.
If I use JPGs or TIFFs, the pixel aspect ratio is not preserved when the image is imported. I scaled one of the images in Photoshop, using a modified menu file that was installed with Encore DVD, because it already has the correct size for PAL, the pixel aspect ratio and the guides for the save areas. I saved the image as TIFF and as PSD and imported both into Encore DVD. The TIFF is rendered with a 1:1 pixel aspect ratio and NOT with the D1/DV PAL aspect ration that is stored in the TIFF. Thus the image gets narrowed and isn't displayed the way I wanted it any more. Only the PSD looks correct. But I think I saw this already in another thread...
I cannot really understand why the MPEG encoding engine would produce bit rates that are illegal and that are not accepted afterwards, when Encore DVD is putting together all the stuff. Why is the MPEG encoding engine itself not throwing an error during the encoding process? This would save the developer so much time. Instead they have to wait until the end, thinking everything went right, and find out then that there was a problem.
Still, if sometime somebody finds out more about the whole matter I would be glad about further explanations.
Best regards,
Christian

Raw Read Error Rate, Errors occurred while reading raw data from a disk

hi
when I turn my pavilion dv6 2170ee computer on screen shows below error.
system diognostics (F2) does not any work
and when my windows7 comming up this error was shown.
I install Hard Disk Sentinel software and this program shows below:
Failure Predicted - Attribute: 1 Raw Read Error Rate, Errors occurred while reading raw data from a disk. Indicate problem with the disk surface or the read/write heads.
There are 28 weak sectors found on the disk surface. They may be remapped any time in the later use of the disk.
26848 errors occured during data transfer. This may indicate problem of the device or with data/power cables. It is recommended to examine and replace the cables if possible.
Replace hard disk immediately.
how can I fix it?
may drive format (Fdisk) and renewing windows can fix it?
tanx and regards
Mohammad

Hello mohkhosh,
I see that you're getting an error indicating possible hard driver failure, that you have this message from 3 different sources. I will try to help you with this.
After reviewing everything you're looking at needing to replace the hard drive. I would suggest contacting support to see what they can do for you.
HP Technical Support, North America 1-800-474-6836. For all other regions click here.
Thank you for posting on the HP Forums.
I worked on behalf of HP.

Can subtitles cause data rate too high errors?

I've been building a DVD in Encore CS5, using Sorenson as the transcoder. I've built the disc many times with no issues. Now I've added a Spanish subtitle track, and I am suddenly getting errors that the data rate is too high. Can the subtitles cause this?
These are my Sorenson settings. Ultimately this will be a commercially pressed disc. Do I need to adjust, and if so, how?
Target 8400 kbps
Min: 53% (4452)
Max: 115% (9660)
Total data rate: 8624
2-pass VBR, 720x480.
Audio: ATSC A/52
Data rate: 224
Sample: 48K
Stereo, 16

The question will be in part what the actual datarate is (and most particularly, datarate spikes). If we were using burned disks, I would worry. Since players don't have to play burned disks, they are less likely to be uniform in handling datarate variations. You are replicating; correct? So a player that fails to play correctly, is failing what it is supposed to do. As long as you are in spec, you should be okay.
The other way to answer this: no, I would not trust Encore failing to throw an error as a sufficient guarantee. Does the replicator test for datarate?

Why do I get data rate too high error after capture and save? (using AJA Kona)

I record(capture) about an 70 min program with Adobe premiere CS5 once a week. About a year ago I got the error *data rate too high" when stopping "capture" when saving program to Video HD(2TB). The video recorded was OK but after about 15 min the audio was out of sync and garbled. I thought I had found the problem by defragging the video drive. I have not had any problems for about 50 weeks.. until this week-it happened again. I know the video drive(2TB) was defragged and only half full. I was able to recover the program since I back up the program on a DVD but had to go through a lot of problems massaging it since I send the program to a local ABC broadcast station in 16/9 SD and the DVD is rescored in 4/3 .
I have the CS5 program on a separate 2.5 GB drive. I am running Win7pro and have a RAID series of Intel Xeon ES410 processors.
Any help as to why I get this "Data Rate too High" when saving program would be appreciated.
Thanks much!

I have three Mitsubishi broadcast quality cameras (two HD -waiting on money for switcher and 3rd HDcamera). They feed to their camera control untints and then to a switcher and then into video computer and the C5S. I probably am not answering your question. I can access the computers from my home(I also have a CG computer). Is there some way I can tell you from the C5S program which the info you need? I have it ready to record for next week.
I know how to manipulate various functions but I do not know all the ins and outs of the Premiere settings-an IT man set those up for me two years and he is no longer available.
Thanks

How do you fix error message "data rate for this file is too high for DVD. You must replace this file with one of a lower data rate".

When trying to burn a DVD it will go through the encoding step and at 98% we see the message 'data rate for this file is too high for DVD. You must replace this file with one of a lower data rate". We need help to correct this so we can complete burning to DVD.

What did you export from Premiere?
Did you use the MPEG2-DVD preset... and did you make any changes to the preset?
CS5-thru-CC PPro/Encore tutorial list http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1448923 may help

Kernal Data Inpage Error, No Bootable Device, Critical Process Died AGAIN! Please help!

I bought this S55-A5295 in July 2013. It started to have problems in April 2014. After 3 months of Critical Process Died, No Bootable Device, and having it shut down multiple times a day, I eventually convince service to take accept it because when I tried to do the recovery, the hard drive was missing partitions needed. (My $30 to ship, despite under warranty)
I received it back late June. The factory replaced the faulty screen (a different problem), but did not replace the hard drive. They supposedly "fixed" it, and added the needed partitions, should I need to do recovery again. I know that the partition was added because when I got it back, instead of being like new out of the box and ready to use, I was locked out because it was set to administrator and there was no option to access it, so I had to use the partitioned info. and do ANOTHER reset after getting it back from them. Not great service all around.
Now the laptop is out of warranty and I've started having problems again.
Sept. 16 -- I had a Kernal Data Inpage Error. The laptop made a horrible sound and shut down. At the time there was a Toshiba Canvio Slim II external drive attached.
Sept. 18 -- EFI\Microsoft\Boot\BCD 0xc00000bb the boot configuration data for your PC is missing or containing errors.
Sept. 19 -- Kernal Data Inpage Error. At this point I had removed the external drive, in case that was the problem. It wasn't letting me remove it earlier in the week. I didn't use it much over the next week.
Sept. 27 -- No Bootable Device.
Sept. 30 -- Kernal Data Inpage Error (volmgrx.sys)
Then Critical Process Died -- 3 different times
Then it restarted itself once without an error code.
Today, Oct. 1, I installed updates from Toshiba, including one fpr HDD and I performed maintenance. I tried to do the hard drive check, but the tabs in the instructions on the computer don't actually exist.
The directions: go to Computer, Properties, Tools tab (can't find it) , so no Error Checking and Check.
However, I did find, under Performance information and Tools my computer's performance rating. The Primary Hard Disk data transfer rate is 5.9.
So far it hasn't shut down today and hopefully the updates have fixed any issues, but I want to be prepared if they don't.
Are these errors coming from my laptop's hard drive? Is there a way for me to actually check that? Are the errors somehow connected to my TOSHIBA external drive? I haven't connected the external drive since the errors started happening, but i will need to use it again at some point, I just wanted to make sure the laptop was okay first.
Also, I am still running Windows 8. That's what they reset it to at the factory, and last time the issues seemed to correspond to me upgrading to 8.1, so I am wary to end up with a $600 paper weight again.
Please advise. Thanks!!

..went through the whole reset. ... ..do ANOTHER reset after getting it back from them
What can I say? The gold-standard test for a software problem is to restore the hard disk to its original out-of-the-box contents.
I'm a Windows specialist. Can't troubleshoot hardware.
-Jerry

Problem making slideshow. "Data rate to high"

Using Encore CS3 on Win XP. Trying make dvd on a short film and some slideshows. Total c 2,5 GB. Building stops telling me: PGC "Lenas" has an error at 00:01:31:08. The data rate is too high for DVD. You must replace the file with one of a lower rate.....ref, EPGC...." All pictures in slideshow "Lenas" are the same size, 2-2,5 MB, nothing special with the picture at 00:01:31:08. What does the info say?
Preview with no problems.
Regards Gunnar Löwenhielm

What are the pixel x pixel dimensions of those still images?
What is your Encore Project setting?
How many images do you have per SlideShow?
Good luck,
Hunt

Audio Data Rate digitizing DVCPRO50 over firewire

I'm having this weird issue when I digitize DVCPRO50 footage into one of my Dual 2Ghz G5s. For some reason, once the clips are in (I'm bringing in entire tapes) -- the audio data rate is at a strange number (like 47722 khz) rather than the standard 48khz. And that number is not consistent -- it ranges from 37782 to 47991. Has anyone ever seen this? It seems to be something with this machine or version of FCP because I can digitize on another G4 or G5 running 4.5 and it comes in fine. But then I have to transfer it via FW drive which is a big hassle. The specs are: Dual 2ghz G5, Panasonic DVCPRO50 SD93 Firewire deck, internal 1TB raid, 2.5GB RAM.
Please help if you have any ideas.
Thanks.
Aaron

It it maybe a situation where the source uses Drop Frame timecode and the FCP capture setting doesn't? Or vice versa?
I haven't done the math yet to check, but your sample rate numbers could reflect errors resulting from FCP trying to compute NDF sample rates while looking at incoming DF timecode. Or vice versa.
The different sample rates would then be the result of different length clips, which would have more or less DF "adjustments" in them, and so would produce different apparent sample rates if view as NDF clips.
Like I said it's just a guess, but check out to see that your DF or NDF timecode settings are the same for the source as for the capture.
Maybe I'm right. Or maybe I'm talking through my hat. It's happened before...

PE2 Data Rate too high

I am trying to burn a 15 minute video straight to the DVD. During the burning process (after rendering for about 10 hours) I got the following message: "The data rate of this file is too high for DVD. You must replace the file with one of a lower data rate. -PGC Info: name=, ref=Apgc, time= 00:07:44:23"
I successfully burned the same project a week ago; my only changes were adding some transitions and a few stills.
My project is video (most converted from VHS), music (ripped from CD or itunes), Audio (narrative recorded at home) and stills (almost all reduced to ~300Kb).
I am in the middle now of trying to burn to a file, but the error spooks me.
Any thoughts

Ned,
Some place, you have set the Data-rate above the DVD-spec. of 10 MB/s for ALL Assets, or have spikes above that. Now, since this is for all streams, Audio + Video, something below 8 works best. Then, if there is a momentary spike, it falls below the threshold of 10. In your Export settings, this has been set to high, either by you, or the program. PE is pretty smart about spikes, but can get fooled by the Assets, sometimes.
Check your output settings. I find that a setting of ~7 max. is better for player compatibility, though PE does allow one to go to 8 max.
Hunt

Max Data Rate: AGP 2x?!

Bought myself a new MSI-KT6 Delta a few weeks ago (MSI-6590), and have had no problems until now.
First up, my GeForce 4 Ti 4600 decided to suddenly die. Random characters on the screen in text mode, flickery colours and corrupt pixels everywhere. Windows wouldn't detect it properly anymore.
Bought a new Powercolor Radeon 9600 XT with VIVO today. Downloaded the new drivers, and loaded up some Battlefield, all good. Runs nice and smooth. COD, Quake 3, etc, no problems at all.
Halo, however... BAD. Even with the basic graphics settings and no Pixel-Shading, it runs at 4 frames a second, and nothing I do changes this, from lowest to highest with Pixel-Shaders 2.0. Although there's a visual difference, it's just as slow.
So I loaded up ATI control Panel and used SmartGart to enable 8x and Fast-Writes... Rebooted, lots of flickering screen, and Windows XP is now software-rendering everything (Transparent menus take 100% CPU to fade in)
Wait for SmartGart to fix my graphics again, and it's all back to 4x and no fast-write.
Loaded up SiSoft Sandra, to check the settings in there...
Mainboard: "Max Data Rate: AGP 2x"
AGP Card: "Data Transfer Modes Support: 1x, 2x"
"AGP Bus is unused or AGP card not fully AGP compatible"
Er... should this be right? BIOS wont let me select an AGP speed, it's "Auto" and I can't select it. I'm a little concerned that my Motherboard may have been damaged! I'll go get the latest Halo Patch, but it doesn't change the fact that I can't use 8x or Fast-Write.
I'm a little apprehensive about flashing my BIOS, made more difficult by the fact that I have no working floppy drive.
CPU: AMD 2600+
RAM: 2x512mb DDR 333MHz Kingston
AlphaGremlin

Well, I updated the VIA drivers, and an updated Sandra. AGP is running at 8x, and Fast-Writes are enabled! I don't know what the hell SmartGart was going on about, but it appears to slunk away and disappeared completely from the ATI control panel since the last reinstall of drivers.
So there's one problem solved... but I don't know what's up with Halo... I can set it to the lowest settings and it still runs like an elephant with three legs, even with the -useff option for Fixed Function shaders... ah well, that's a matter for another forum, eh?
Interesting note: Sandra reports my 120gb drive as 605gb... should I be trusting it?
AlphaGremlin

How to achieve high usb data rate with cRIO-9022?

Hi all,
I read the datasheet of NI-9022 and know that USB data rate can be 480Mb/s.
I want to transfer data with rate 3.6MB/s which is much slower than the spec, but the result is time out error.
I check my FPGA and RT code by save to RT disk and the result is pass. So I think my code should be correct.
Is that because the USB driver not installed into RT?
Should I install the USB driver into RT?
Or is there any other issue I haven't find?
Thanks a lot.

According to this document: Data Storage Options for CompactRIO, depending on many conditions, such as complexity of processor
requirements, USB data can be transferred off the controller at
approximately 700 KB/s.
Also, you don't need a driver to get a USB mass storage device to work on the cRIO. Have a look at this document:
Utilizing Features of the USB Port on My cRIO-901x or My cFP-22xx Controller
Not sure if these issues are causing timeout errors. What happens when you transfer data at lower speeds? Do you get timeout errors then?
Adnan Zafar
Certified LabVIEW Architect
Coleman Technologies

Another PGC Data Rate Error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for