Apple TV Upconverting?

Doe's AppleTV have any up-converting video capabilities and/or algorithms, as found in an up-converting DVD player. I find my up-converting DVD player is much better then my older dvd player. Before I invest in an AppleTV I would like to see this obvious feature included. Is AppleTV's video processor considered to be state of the art, as found in a Blue Ray player, or is it only modestly adequate? I have been waiting for a second generation AppleTV, but since it doesn't appear to be coming any time soon, I might have to go ahead with the present product.
Does the AppleTV have a zoom feature?
Thanks

Havingamacattack wrote:
Doe's AppleTV have any up-converting video capabilities and/or algorithms, as found in an up-converting DVD player. I find my up-converting DVD player is much better then my older dvd player.
It must do some kind of upcoversion as it has a fairly basic CPU that can only decode video files up to 720p at 24fps, but can output a 1080i or 1080p signal to the TV - so presumably the graphics card upscales the 720p material when output to the TV.
Proper documentation of the hardware is scanty - from memory I think it's a 1GHz basic Intel CPU of some kind, 256MB RAM, and some kind of basic nVidia graphics chip.
Before I invest in an AppleTV I would like to see this obvious feature included.
You obviously feel upscaling DVD is worthwhile - many people feel it adds nothing at all. You cannot re-create real information that was never recorded, but the upscaling may produce an effect that people find more pleasing.
Other would argue that any upscaling is better done by the TV, but really it depends on the upscaling circuitry of the TV vs input device.
Is AppleTV's video processor considered to be state of the art, as found in a Blue Ray player, or is it only modestly adequate?
Modestly adequate only I'd say - that's not to say bad, just that for a device like AppleTV there can't be much budgeted for the graphics chip.
If it had a high end graphics processor/scaler chip I think Apple would be singing from the rooftops about it, to let us know what it is. Silence suggests it's nothing special.
I have been waiting for a second generation AppleTV, but since it doesn't appear to be coming any time soon, I might have to go ahead with the present product.
I don't think it's been a roaring success of a device - but seeing as media rental seems to be becoming a big focus for Apple, I 'd be surprised if they dropped AppleTV anytime soon. International price cuts would do wonders for sales, it's just too expensive for average consumers who pay £20 for DVD players, for the privilege of renting from Apple.
I would love an AppleTV 2.0 as well with a fast processor and high-end scaling chip, functioning USB, more file type support and a solid state drive (the mechanical hard drive is the most likely thing to fail I would imagine) of around the same capacity as the 40GB.
Some big enhancements could already be added in software to the current model, but as they've not been I don't think we'll see them in a new model - this device's marketing has changed from being about playing your personal media collection to a portal into the iTunes store with your media relegated to the bottom option in each category belkow 4 or 5 store tabs.
Does the AppleTV have a zoom feature?
No, nor does it have pointless trick play navigation - only pause/play/ff/rw/next/prev.
Zoom might be useful for higher res photos than 1920x1080, but I doubt I'd use it personally.
Ac
AC

Similar Messages

  • SD DVD upconvert

    Does Apple TV upconvert your SD DVD's that you own to 1080p similar to buying an upconvert DVD player. If not is there software out there that does.

    I am sorry what I am asking is if I were to take one of my old SD movies and put it on my mac and then transfer it to Itunes for watching on the Apple TV. Does Apple TV take that information an upscale it to 1080P resolution much the same way that a upconverting DVD palyer would if you take a SD movie and play it on that. Or is there software for the mac that can do this

  • MacBook as upconverting DVD player

    Does a MacBook - connected directly to a plasma HDTV - offer any advantage over a regular DVD player?
    I couldn't find much on this topic so I tested it myself and found my MacBook is an excellent DVD player. I don't have an upconverting DVD player to compare to, but I can say the MacBook (FrontRow player in Leopard) is far superior to my progressive scan Toshiba SD-3750 DVD player (component connections), which isn't bad. I suspect the direct digital connection to my Panasonic 50" plasma accounts for most of the gain - no D to A to D conversions. Not sure whether the Mac or the panny does the upconversion, but the result is very good.
    Now, I don't know if I want to hook up my laptop every time I rent a DVD, but it'll be hard to watch the old Toshiba player now that I've seen the light.

    Macaby wrote:
    I played on DVD from my MacBook to my LCD and it did work great. However, the downside of doing so is just not worth it in my opinion.
    1. Cord problem. Necessary to hookup cords to TV to do so.
    2. Perhaps unsafe layouts as to where to place MacBook. Due to cord length, I had to balance my MacBook on a chair and hope is stayed there.
    3. Wear and tear on DVD player in laptop. From reading several posts on this site, there seems to be a problem of DVD malfunctions due to perhaps excessive play.
    4. Economics, there are several up-conversion DVD players on the market for well less than $100. I recently bought one at Costco for about $40 and it seems to do a great job and plays everything I throw at it including stuff I burn, some of which, my MacBook DVD player won't play.
    5. Ease of use in having a DVD player ready to go at a moments notice without going through the hoops of connecting a MacBook.
    6. And the biggest reason, I don't have to worry about a DVD getting stuck in my MacBook. From time to time, I had DVD's and CD's get stuck in desktop optical drives. At least when it happens there, they have a tiny hole that will eject the tray manually when poked with a paperclip.
    1. I use my MacBook's "extension" cord left in place near the TV, and use only the brick for most day-to-day stuff. I also have a DVI-HDMI cable just for this purpose, with the Apple adapter, also in place. Worst thing is I have to borrow the audio cables from the regular DVD player. Going to optical cables soon, so even this will be easy.
    2. Yes, perching on anything isn't good. I have a handy spot on the floor that's out of the way.
    3. My biggest qualm. I don't use the drive for much else and frankly don't watch many movies, so I'm not too worried. But agreed it's not a good permanent installation. I guess a cheap external DVD drive is an option. More cables though!
    4. I've been wondering how good a job they do, whether they're a scam or not. Do the cheap ones really beat an older progressive-scan DVD player? Maybe with the HDMI (all digital) connection they do. Also considering a PS3, and that's what got me thinking in the first place. Seems like PS3 = AppleTV+Blu-Ray player+gaming.
    5. No question, but see #1. I only started doing this to watch Lost in HD streaming - something not possible with a DVD player - and then I got intrigued by the whole HD and Blu-ray movie thing.
    6. Whew, this hasn't happened yet, knock on wood. My daughter managed to squish her MacBook so that the slot narrowed and that caused some trouble but otherwise I haven't had one get stuck.

  • PLEASE HELP!!! APPLE COLOR PROFILES

    I am currently editing DVCAM and DVCPRO NTSC and HD content using Final Cut Pro 5. For the most part, I am monitoring the color correction process using three monitors: an Apple LCD monitor, a Sony CRT computer monitor, and a FireWire-output to a DVCAM deck, which is then sending S-Video to an upconverting Sony 1080i CRT Television.
    The Sony 1080i CRT Television has been carefully calibrated to look like a best-case "consumer" monitor using the THX Optimizer DVD as well as some other off-the-shelf DVD calibration tools. It HAS NOT been ISF-Certified, but that's ok in my opinion, since I produce DVDs that are viewed primarily on consumer TVs without ANY calibration (sad, but true).
    My question is this: between my CRT TV, CRT Monitor, and LCD Monitor, my colors are totally inconsistent. I have noticed that in the Apple System Preferences, I can select from a variety of color profiles for the computer displays, including various versions of RGB, NTSC (1953) and SMPTE-C. Does anyone know which of these profiles, if any, I should assign to my various monitors? I've especially noticed the difference between the LCD and the CRT displays, and I'm wondering if there is some way to compensate for this.
    Thanks very much in advance for your professional advice!
    - Jordan

    Not the answer you want, but, the easiest and best solution is to simply ignore the colour on all but your television monitor.
    rh

  • Upconverting previously bought music from itunes

    I am trying too upconvert my older bought music from itunes to the new acc at 256 kbps. How can this be done?
    Thanks everyone. Newbie to the discussion group

    I am having the same problem with my ipod classic. I have done the 5R's,I have authorized computer, and performed all the related fixes in the support area. No luck.
    Also, I am not able to load the latest ipod software (I have itunes 8 loaded). Error 1436. Performed all the support fixes with not luck. Anybody have a solution short of returning the ipod to Apple?
    Thanks

  • Help with upconverting PAL SD to HD DVCPRO 720p24

    Can anybody give me some guidance on this topic? I have 720x576 25ps material I want to include in an HD DVCPRO 720p24 project - got about 50 mins material to convert, hopefully in Compressor. I've tried, and am getting disappointing results. I want to crop top and bottom off all the material as I upconvert to get to the aspect ratio.

    Sounds like your Mac would benefit from a Compressor reinstall.
    Reinstalling Compressor is pretty fast and easy when using Pacifist, like described here: http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/01/11/compressor-hatred-resolved/
    In Pacifist, remember to check Don't ask again for this installation before hitting Replace.
    Much easier and faster than doing it the Apple way.
    Also remember to update Compressor once reinstalled

  • Upconverting SD to HD

    We use 3 Apple Cineman displays for Keynote presentations. We shoot a lot of internal videos in miniDV for now, until we get a high end Panasonic camera w/ P2 Card. Anyway, whats the best way to upconvert footage from miniDV to HD sizes like 1440x1080. With Keynote, we the slides and type look amazing at this resolution, but obviously the video does not due to the 720x480 DV size. Should I use compressor to upconvert? And if so, how should I set it up? Use the Frame Controls and Geometry tabs to do so? I know that won't be true hiDef video, only in pixel size, but how will the video look? Has anyone out there done this yet? Does the video look okay, or really crappy?
    Also, we are looking the either a Kona Card or AJA IO or IO HD, how will this help with the conversion process? Will this take the place of Compressor? Or is the IO only for input and not used for output like Compressor is? Any thoughs.
    Sorry for the length, but many questions I have, yes!

    You have options when you do an upconversion. You can either pillarbox the entire image, meaning that you'll have black bars on the sides of a 4:3 picture, or you can do an extraction of approx. 1/3 of the 4:3 frame to fill a 16:9 frame, or you can stretch to fill the screen. The most common extraction is a center cut, but you could also do a top or bottom cut if the important picture information is in one of those areas of the frame. I've done upconversion through Compressor with decent results. I've also had upconversion done via Teranex and I've used a Panasonic AJ1200 deck to do upconversion. All three produced similar results. The final image will be a little fuzzy.
    I personally think that extractions look better than pillarboxing or stretching. Go with Compressor for the cheapest results, just keep in mind that render times can be very long when you are upconverting footage.
    Shane and I worked on a show last year that had a ton of upconverted footage. We did a lot of the upconversions in Compressor. He used to have the droplets that we made posted on his site, but I'm not sure where you can find them now. Maybe he'll pop in with a link.

  • Uncompressed QT vs Apple Pro Res

    Hi All
    We are about to venture into 16mm transfer to HD for the first time. The telecine house can give us Uncompressed QTs or Apple Pro Res on a hard drive.
    These are the pro's and con's as I far as I can tell:
    Uncompressed QT:
    - Large Files
    - Cannot be used (without conversion) on our current FCP set-up
    - Highest quality, which is great for archiving and future use of the media
    Apple Pro Res:
    - Smaller files
    - Can be used directly on our set-up, without any conversion (there are some time constraints on the project
    - Almost the same quality as Uncompressed (???)
    The workflow I am considering is to get the files back as uncompressed qt's (to make sure the Masters are the highest quality possible) then convert them to Apple Pro Res in Compressor, then edit. Does that sound right?
    Is there any point to doing a 'neg match' (editing in Apple Pro Res then upconverting to uncompressed qt's as if in an off-line/on-line environment)?
    And, lastly, what Apple Pro Res format should I ask for?
    Any other golden nuggets of information you ca add will be greatly appreciated.
    cheers
    -j-

    Hi Jokke, If it's not too late, I've just been through exactly the same decision: shot on super 16 and had to worry about what to do with it. For me the decision had a lot to do with speed of editing, size of files and the way the final thing would be presented (HD Mpeg projected in my case) For all these reasons, the Prores codec worked fine. All the film buffs will scoff at this but very often the differences are really indiscernible and you won't need a bunch of supercomputers to crunch through the uncompressed footage with filters and dissolves applied to it. If you choose to go with Prores, you should definitely take the 422 HQ variety, although I think there's a newer better Prores codec coming out. Maybe one of the more tech-savvy persons on the forum would know about that.

  • Upconvert Fuzziness

    Hello Group,
    Question on an upconvert procedure that has me a little confused.
    A show will be shot on the HVX200 using some DVCPROHD to FireStore for slo-mo and beauty shots, and using MiniDV for the rest. They would, of course, like to send the whole thing out as DVCPROHD (apparently the end result will be broadcast and they want it at 720p).
    Now, 720p24 is obviously 23.98 and the HVX200 in SD can do 24p or 24pa. If I capture EVERYTHING as 720p24 using my Kona card, shouldn't the DP plan to use 24pa for the SD stuff so the framerates will match? I am a little confused because I know that when we master to tape, pulldown will be added back in anyway, but editing the two different framerates could be problematic...right?
    Thanks In Advance!
    ~Athen

    i've a buddy who uses an hvx and a firestore. he's not been able to get overcranked video to capture to firestore. confirm that you can do this.
    dvcpro hd for slo mo and beauty but the rest on mini-dv, this makes no sense.
    but, as i don't know the reasons there are two options that i can see: downconvert in camera the dvcpro hd and spit it out as dv25 so there you have the same flavour of video to work with.
    i was reading a thread from paul from apple somewhere the past couple of days and he was extolling the virtues of format conversion within compressor. do a short test of "uprezzing" dv25 to dvcpro hd 720p24 and see what it looks like. most likely it'll be horrendous but ya won't know until ya test. then try the other way and see what happens.
    i for one will be very glad when there is one tv format........yeah, i'll keep dreaming.

  • Apple Lossless streaming on Apple TV

    When streaming Apple Lossless files on on Apple TV, what is the maximum bitrate? I realize Apple TV can stream AAC and MP3 files at 320 kbps, but what about Apple Lossless file that can often provide up to 1,000 kbps? Does Apple TV support such high bitrates? (I know the sampling is always 16 bit / 48 kHz).

    Hello. For some reason, your reply to my May 2 post, has disappeared, though I still have it in email. I've reposted in below.
    First, let me thank you for taking the time to answer my questions. I'm confident that you've zeroed in on a solution. The clarity of your response is greatly appreciated.
    Your points about compressed/lossy formats make sense. This explains the lower bitrates for those formats.
    You also asked about the original source of my alac (Apple Lossless) files. As you may have guessed, the original files are typical itunes downloads, which I understand are usually MP3s at 256 kbps.
    I had assumed that running them through the itunes converter would transform them into proper (16/44.1) lossless files with the associated bitrates ranging around 1,000 kbps -- with a much richer sound.
    At first glance, it would appear that I was wrong. Merely upsampling the music has created larger files but without the added clarity, depth and soundstage. That's how I read your previous post. Again, correct me if I am wrong about this.
    However, there is a twist.
    As I mentioned, when I play these alac files through Apple TV -- through homesharing on my computer -- they sound no better than the 256k files. However, when I play the same files through the foobar2000 media streaming software, they sound much better and show the proper bitrates at around 1,000 kbps.
    On this last question, my ears may be playing tricks on me, but I don't think so. I'm playing the files through a good system: an audiolab 8200CDQ pre-amp and 8200p power amp.
    So, this has me stumped.
    One last question: what is the point of having a program that upconverts MP3/AAC files to lossless if there is no improvement in sound quality. Why would you have a bigger file that sounds just as bad as the small one?
    Regards
    Here is your May 3 post, which has disappeared from the websit.
    May 3
    No problem. Sorry for the long reply.
    I see what you mean about my equation. All 16/48 stereo signals would equate to 1536kbps. If you changed the sample rate to 44.1 (what CDs use) or something else, then the bitrate would change.
    Now thats for uncompressed formats like WAV, AIFF, and PCM. And in the case of Airplay, the stream getting sent to the AppleTV is always uncompressed, no matter the the original format (aac, mp3, apple lossless, etc).
    AAC files (and mp3, wma) are known as compressed formats: some fancy math equations are used to reduce the file size w/o your brain noticing the missing bits, so that initial stream (1536 kbps for instance) gets reduced to 320 kbps or lower in order to fit more songs on your device. the way this happens is really crazy but if you want to learn about it theres a magazine that did a good article. WARNING, its really technical!: http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/apr12/articles/lost-in-translation.htm
    you seem to be able to hear the difference between compressed and uncompressed formats. many people do but many dont. It all depends on your hearing, sound equipment, etc. I was wondering if the reason your not hearing a difference btwn apple lossless and aac might be because of where the lossleess files came from. did you rip them from CD's or convert them from another format? If they didn't come from CD's, WAV, or AIFF files, you probably won't hear a difference, because you can't "upconvert" from something like AAC to Apple Lossless and get higher sound quality. If they came from CDs, then maybe the AAC versions are just really good quality to begin with and so you are having a hard time telling. That article has some examples of the same music in different formats, so you can test your ears and see if you notice a difference.
    bE

  • I am having macbook air recently my iphotos did not open and was showing report apple and reopen but i came to know that by pressing alt and iphotos i open an new photo library and stored the pics but now how can i get the pics which i had in the earlier

    i am having macbook air recently my iphotos did not open and was showing report apple and reopen but i came to know that by pressing alt and iphotos i open an new photo library and stored the pics but now how can i get the pics which i had in the earlier photo please help me to recover my photos

    Well I'll guess you're using iPhoto 11:
    Option 1
    Back Up and try rebuild the library: hold down the command and option (or alt) keys while launching iPhoto. Use the resulting dialogue to rebuild. Choose to Repair Database. If that doesn't help, then try again, this time using Rebuild Database.
    If that fails:
    Option 2
    Download iPhoto Library Manager and use its rebuild function. (In early versions of Library Manager it's the File -> Rebuild command. In later versions it's under the Library menu.)
    This will create an entirely new library. It will then copy (or try to) your photos and all the associated metadata and versions to this new Library, and arrange it as close as it can to what you had in the damaged Library. It does this based on information it finds in the iPhoto sharing mechanism - but that means that things not shared won't be there, so no slideshows, books or calendars, for instance - but it should get all your events, albums and keywords, faces and places back.
    Because this process creates an entirely new library and leaves your old one untouched, it is non-destructive, and if you're not happy with the results you can simply return to your old one.  
    Regards
    TD

  • Apple Mini DVI to Video Adapter - do you need cables as well?????????????

    Apple Mini DVI to Video Adapter
    i have this already,but do i need a certain cable to go into the TV. as it only has one port instead of the usual 3 av leads have???
    help please,confused...............

    Look in your question and you'll find the answer...
    Apple mini DVI to Video Adapter
    ...the usual 3 av (audio/video) leads...
    DVI is video only so you only need one port... if you were hooking up audio and video you'd need three (1 for video - 2 for the left/right audio channels)

  • Apple Mini-DVI to Video Adapter for eMac ?

    Hi,
    I use an Apple Mini DVI to VGA on my eMac to expand my monitor space, connect to an old Pinceton 15" lcd, both are on 1024 x 768 res in millions colors, and work fine.
    My question is I have plan to buy an Apple Mini-DVI to Video Adapter since some of my project require a transfer process to an old vcr or Sony TRV-27 mini dv cam.
    Would the adapter compatible for my eMac mini DVI port ? because eMac is not mentioned as apple compatible for this adapter at apple store, yet there is a review said it work great on ones eMac.
    Anybody else using this adapter that would share with me ?
    Thank you.

    look like it is indeed an apple mini vga adapter that I use, and now I need an adapter that allow me to connect to a TV, VCR or Mini-DV camcorder.
    will that Apple Mini-DVI to Video adapter compatible to my eMac. Or do they have mini-vga to video adapter on aapple store.
    Thank you any information.

  • Apple Mini-DVI to Video Adapter

    I have just purhased a new Macbook. My first mac ever
    My question is regardng the Apple Mini-DVI to Video Adapter.
    Do I read that correctly that I can hook my macbook up via rca and s-video but not composite? Does Apple make one cable that will do both?
    I would like the ability to hook up to a projector which will likely be composite. As well RCA/S-video via t.v or DVD inputs.
    Thanks
    Tig

    For VGA you will need the Mini-DVI to VGA adapter. For composite video you will need the Mini-DVI to video adapter. If you want sound while using the video adapter you will need a 3.5mm to rca stereo cable. This is a y cable like this Example of 3.5mm to RCA Y cable
    FYI the RCA output on the video adapter is composite video.

  • Apple Mini-DVI to Video Adapter Question

    I want to hook up my macbook (late 2008 model) to my tv. Will the Apple Mini-DVI to Video Adapter
    work? If it will work on my tv then what else do I need to get? It looks like you need other wires to hook up to your tv? Thanks in advance for your help!

    The new MacBooks that use the NVIDIA 9400M video chip do _not_ support output to analog TVs. Thus, with the current MacBooks the only way to get output to an analog TV is with a third-party VGA-to-analog TV converter box -- you can't just use one of Apple's cables (although you'll need the mini display port to VGA adapter cable to connect to a third-party VGA-to-TV converter box).
    More specifically, you can _not_ use one of Apple's $19, DVI to Video (composite/S-Video) adapters on the new MacBooks.
    See also this discussion:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1927674&tstart=15

Maybe you are looking for