Application runs slower on Solaris

We have developed an Application in Java (Servlets, JSP & Core Java classes including thread).
My Application runs fast on Windows, but its terribly slow on Solaris. When the application is run on Solaris the CPU usage is very less around 3 to 5 % only and there is no major io bound operation also. Please comment on this behaviour when am running the application on Solaris.
For eg: A while loop in my program took around 16 msecs to execute in Windows machine, but the same while loop is taking 250 msecs to run in solaris.
Note: The solaris machine is very powerful than the desktop windows machine.
Thanks & Regards,
Salin

Which version of Solaris are you running and what threading library is currently in use? Did you use some profiling application to arrive at the benchmark results you obtained or some other means were used? Does the code within the while loop call any classes making use of Java threads and synchronization mechanisms?

Similar Messages

Application running slow in ver 1.5, 1.6 but not in 1.4

We have a application that was running very slow when we used any version sun java instead of MS java in IE6 SP2.
I removed MS Java from IE and installed Sun java 1.4.2_16 and the applications starts in under 10sec's.
But we had to test the other version of java as well, i then installed the other versions from 1.5 update 14 to 1.6 update 4 and the application takes about 30 to 40 sec to load the web page.
I then looked at the development version of java 1.6 update 10 and version 7. In 1.6 update 10 the application would load but would not refresh the applets it would just hang. In version 7 the application would not start up at all.
In all the versions i increased the memory parmeters from 128 to 256 and in version 1.6 i changed it to -Xmx300m as well but still the application was slow loading. Removed all the versions and reinstalled 1.4.2_14 and the application works fine and loads up under 10 sec.
Does any one have any idea why this is happening.
IE 6 sp2
XP sp2 been used.

You should try profiling the startup code.
As a first go around, you might try getting a stack trace during the startup process and look for locks (see jstack).
If your application is built on Swing, it's my understanding that the later versions of Java are more strict about use of the Event Dispatch Thread--pay particular attention to activity off the EDT locking the thread.

Applications run slower after 3.0 update...

my applications especially games are running slower after 3.0 update...
any ideas?

Try reseting your phone - press both the home and sleep/wake buttons until the Apple icon appears (ignore the red slider). If it's still slow, restore in iTunes. Apps should run at least as fast under 3.0 as 2.2.1)

Why PB application run slower in Windows 7 than XP?

Hi there,
Why PB application in windows 7 64-bit slower than in XP? Is something that I need to change in OS level or PB?
The PB version 12.x
Any suggestion will be appreciated.
thx!

Hi Patrick;
I would have to say in general that in all my W7 versus XP testing that PB runs about 15-20% slower on W7 than XP.
Now, this can be counteracted by stepping up the memory and CPU power on your W7 machine.
However, newer W7 machines speeds can be severely degraded by low RAM configuration and in particular poor printer drivers. The latter is what determines the DataWindow speed as the DWO utilizes the current printer driver to visualize the DW primary buffer. So a poor performing print driver can not only slow your application down but make the DW Painter in the IDE very slow to open
Regards ... Chris

Application running slow

Hi Hussain
User are complaining that the appilcation is running very slow, so what are the things i need to check for this issue and how to troubleshoot
Regds

Hi,
Please see the docs/links referenced in the following threads.
Performance is very slow
Performance is very slow
EBS, performence issue
Re: EBS, performence issue
E-business Performance issuse
E-business Performance issuse
Regards,
Hussein

Change Tracker application running slow in Portal

Hello Everyone,
We are having standard SAP Change Tracker application in SAP Portal. It is taking 5mts lo load initially and also its taking the same time for retrieving and displaying the data. I request you to share your ideas on this.
Thanks & Regards,
Ravi

Hi Gabor,
Thanks for your reply!
We have checked that note and we have indexes existing for few other fields as well in the table, but still we are facing the same issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Ravi

Application running too slow on sun T5440 but run normal on sun M3000

Hi all,
I have application running on sun server T5440 4x8x1.4 GHz, 64 GB RAM, application running very slow though load average too low. when I install my application on another server SUN M3000 (One CPU 1x8x2.5GHz, 8GB RAM), application run smoothly.
Here is my server T5440 info:
Code:
bash-3.00# uname -a
SunOS 5.10 Generic_142909-17 sun4v sparc SUNW,T5440
Psrinfo -pv
Code:
bash-3.00# psrinfo -pv
The physical processor has 64 virtual processors (0-63)
UltraSPARC-T2+ (chipid 0, clock 1414 MHz)
The physical processor has 64 virtual processors (64-127)
UltraSPARC-T2+ (chipid 1, clock 1414 MHz)
The physical processor has 64 virtual processors (128-191)
UltraSPARC-T2+ (chipid 2, clock 1414 MHz)
The physical processor has 64 virtual processors (192-255)
UltraSPARC-T2+ (chipid 3, clock 1414 MHz)
/etc/system
Code:
set semsys:seminfo_semopm=10000
set semsys:seminfo_semmsl=10000
set semsys:seminfo_semmni=1024
set max_nprocs=50000
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmnb=2097152
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmni=2560
set msgsys:msginfo_msgtql=2560
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=1073741824
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=1000
set rlim_fd_cur=10000
Ipcs
Code:
bash-3.00# ipcs -a
IPC status from as of Wed Jun 13 12:31:01 ICT 2012
T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR CGROUP CBYTES QNUM QBYTES LSPID LRPID STIME RTIME CTIME
Message Queues:
q 62 0x1388 --rw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 0 0 no-entry no-entry 8:36:22
q 61 0x1387 --rw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 0 0 no-entry no-entry 8:36:22
q 60 0x1318 --rw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 0 0 no-entry no-entry 8:36:22
q 59 0x12a9 --rw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 9069 9071 10:25:38 10:25:38 8:36:22
q 58 0x100f --rw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 9069 9070 10:06:16 10:06:16 8:36:22
q 57 0xfa0 -Rrw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 9071 9069 10:25:38 10:25:38 8:36:22
q 56 0xf30 --rw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 0 0 no-entry no-entry 8:36:20
q 55 0xc27 -Rrw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 0 0 no-entry no-entry 8:28:14
q 54 0xbb8 -Rrw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 172 9066 10:47:08 10:47:08 8:28:14
T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR CGROUP NATTCH SEGSZ CPID LPID ATIME DTIME CTIME
Shared Memory:
T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR CGROUP NSEMS OTIME CTIME
Semaphores:
s 104 0x9c4 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 3 12:31:00 8:36:20
s 103 0xa8c --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 1 8:36:20 8:36:20
s 102 0xd48 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 1 8:36:20 8:36:20
s 101 0xce4 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 1 8:36:20 8:36:20
s 100 0x26de --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 8 10:19:34 8:28:14
s 99 0xc1c --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 1 8:36:20 8:28:14
s 98 0xbb8 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 1 8:43:50 8:28:14
s 97 0xaf0 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 500 8:36:20 8:28:14
s 96 0xa28 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 500 8:36:20 8:28:14
s 95 0x7ee --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 1 8:36:20 8:28:14
s 94 0x7e4 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 1001 8:36:20 8:28:14
s 93 0x7da --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 220 8:36:20 8:28:14
s 92 0x7d5 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 200 12:05:15 8:28:14
s 91 0x7d0 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 200 8:56:42 8:28:14
s 90 0xc80 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 2 12:31:01 8:27:52 –a
Prstat
Code:
PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP
9202 topx 1460M 893M sleep 59 0 0:16:37 0.2% integrity_check/1
12455 root 3880K 3600K cpu65 59 0 0:00:00 0.0% prstat/1
9080 topx 142M 130M sleep 59 0 0:00:52 0.0% intf_resp_low/1
9125 topx 102M 78M sleep 59 0 0:00:36 0.0% interface_vsc/1
9121 topx 88M 80M sleep 59 0 0:00:32 0.0% interface_tcu/1
9120 topx 89M 80M sleep 59 0 0:00:29 0.0% interface_rcm/1
9124 topx 87M 78M sleep 59 0 0:00:29 0.0% baplie_merge_v2/1
9122 topx 86M 78M sleep 59 0 0:00:28 0.0% interface_eih/1
9115 topx 88M 77M sleep 59 0 0:00:33 0.0% intf_batch_even/1
9114 topx 88M 77M sleep 59 0 0:00:39 0.0% intf_event/1
9117 topx 87M 78M sleep 59 0 0:00:32 0.0% interface_bxy/1
9118 topx 86M 78M sleep 59 0 0:00:29 0.0% interface_ppm/1
NPROC USERNAME SWAP RSS MEMORY TIME CPU
41 topx 334M 2237M 3.4% 0:30:17 0.3%
43 root 186M 195M 0.3% 0:14:45 0.0%
1 noaccess 152M 136M 0.2% 0:04:00 0.0%
1 smmsp 3688K 11M 0.0% 0:00:04 0.0%
1 lp 1208K 3880K 0.0% 0:00:00 0.0%
6 daemon 7264K 9944K 0.0% 0:00:26 0.0%
Total: 93 processes, 259 lwps, load averages: 0.40, 0.39, 0.39
Prstat –mL
Code:
bash-3.00# prstat -mL
PID USERNAME USR SYS TRP TFL DFL LCK SLP LAT VCX ICX SCL SIG PROCESS/LWPID
9202 topx 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 99 0.0 2 0 5 0 integrity_ch/1
9080 topx 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 5 0 20 0 intf_resp_lo/1
9114 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 13 0 66 0 intf_event/1
17282 root 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 20 1 324 0 prstat/1
9117 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 10 1 70 0 interface_bx/1
9118 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 10 1 70 0 interface_pp/1
9115 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 15 0 80 0 intf_batch_e/1
9121 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 10 0 70 0 interface_tc/1
9125 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 10 0 70 0 interface_vs/1
9120 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 10 0 70 0 interface_rc/1
9123 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 10 0 70 0 interface_vs/1
9124 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 10 1 70 0 baplie_merge/1
9122 topx 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 8 0 56 0 interface_ei/1
9119 topx 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 8 0 56 0 interface_cp/1
9204 topx 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 15 1 1K 0 sys_check/1
259 root 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 13 2 98 7 in.mpathd/1
1 root 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 3 0 99 3 init/1
1337 noaccess 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 100 0 100 0 java/14
140 root 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 19 0 114 0 nscd/851
Total: 90 processes, 256 lwps, load averages: 0.40, 0.40, 0.39
Vmstat
Code:
bash-3.00# vmstat 1 10
kthr memory page disk faults cpu
r b w swap free re mf pi po fr de sr m0 m1 m2 m3 in sy cs us sy id
0 0 0 87720712 60562856 173 645 199 44 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 886 2819 525 0 1 99
1 0 0 87563976 59743040 73 327 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 747 2831 439 0 1 99
0 0 0 87563656 59742808 61 306 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 770 2684 427 0 1 99
1 0 0 87563656 59742824 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 886 1302 525 0 1 99
1 0 0 87563656 59742816 62 305 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 722 2652 420 3 1 96
1 0 0 87563656 59742840 554 2777 0 139 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 959 9736 749 1 1 97
0 0 0 87563456 59742672 1155 5735 0 292 292 0 0 0 0 0 0 1113 17489 1145 1 3 96
1 0 0 87563656 59742840 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 845 1613 654 0 1 99
0 0 0 87563656 59742856 62 305 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 900 2647 526 0 1 99
0 0 0 87563656 59742856 62 304 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 683 2661 396 0 1 99
Mpstat
Code:
CPU minf mjf xcal intr ithr csw icsw migr smtx srw syscl usr sys wt idl
0 0 0 130 261 1 121 0 13 1 0 0 0 1 0 99
1 0 0 35 133 2 143 0 9 6 0 64 0 0 0 100
2 0 0 5 20 2 17 0 3 0 0 29 1 0 0 99
3 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
4 0 0 3 14 0 15 0 2 2 0 13 0 0 0 100
73 0 0 474330 77 3 0 7 0 2 0 2596 67 33 0 0
73 0 0 487701 37 0 0 7 0 8 0 2670 66 34 0 0
73 0 0 476377 14 0 0 8 0 1 0 2610 66 34 0 0
78 0 0 473950 11 1 0 7 0 13 0 2593 67 33 0 0
78 0 0 480562 9 0 0 7 0 4 0 2630 66 34 0 0
79 0 0 320989 14 1 0 8 0 0 0 1766 77 23 0 0
79 0 0 479148 9 0 0 7 0 8 0 2622 66 34 0 0
79 0 0 479426 13 0 0 7 0 2 0 2622 67 33 0 0
79 0 0 488949 9 0 0 8 0 13 0 2678 66 34 0 0
64 0 0 482229 15 2 0 8 0 7 0 2638 65 35 0 0
77 0 0 475571 14 1 0 7 0 8 0 2602 67 33 0 0
69 0 0 467795 22 1 0 7 0 40 0 2563 66 34 0 0
69 0 0 318623 9 1 0 7 0 8 0 1751 77 23 0 0
66 0 0 465179 92 1 2 8 0 62 0 2545 66 34 0 0
When my application running, some of CPU have IDLE state = 0 and hold the CPU while another CPU have IDLE state 100. I think this is my bottleneck but I cannot find any solution for solve that.
Netstat
Code:
bash-3.00# netstat -i
Name Mtu Net/Dest Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Collis Queue
lo0 8232 loopback localhost 244022 0 244022 0 0 0
nxge0 1500 TOPX-01-DUMMY1 TOPX-01-DUMMY1 3594863 0 5801650 0 0 0
nxge1 1500 TOPX-01-DUMMY2 TOPX-01-DUMMY2 160954 0 151230 0 0 0
iostat
Code:
bash-3.00# iostat -xn
extended device statistics
r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device
0.1 0.1 1.5 30.8 0.0 0.0 1.8 9.0 0 0 md/d0
0.0 0.1 0.8 30.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.9 0 0 md/d1
0.0 0.1 0.8 30.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.8 0 0 md/d2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.2 0 0 md/d3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.9 0 0 md/d4
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.4 0 0 md/d5
0.0 0.0 2.2 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.8 7.4 0 0 md/d6
0.0 0.0 1.1 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.5 0 0 md/d7
0.0 0.0 1.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.2 0 0 md/d8
0.0 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.0 0.0 7.6 10.0 0 0 md/d9
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 0 0 md/d10
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.8 0 0 md/d11
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 10.4 0 0 md/d12
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.5 0 0 md/d13
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.4 0 0 md/d14
0.1 0.5 2.1 32.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.9 0 0 c0t0d0
0.1 0.5 2.1 32.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.8 0 0 c0t1d0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c1t0d0
0.9 0.9 125.3 123.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 34.2 0 2 c4t600144F0CC00C29A00004D1E456F0003d0
0.3 0.7 20.7 53.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 8.2 0 0 c4t600144F0CC00C29A00004D1E43880001d0
0.1 0.2 50.7 111.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.1 0 1 c4t600144F0CC00C29A00004D1E453E0002d0
Please help me find the bottleneck of my T5440 server?Thanks so much for all your help.

Moderator Comment and Action:
@ O.P.,
You cross-posted this to at least two other forum web sites:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/solaris-opensolaris-20/application-running-too-slow-on-sun-sparc-t5440-but-run-normal-on-sun-m3000-4175411155/
http://www.unix.com/solaris/189945-application-running-too-slow-sun-sparc-t5440-but-run-normal-sun-m3000.html
... and didn't think that was important enough to simply mention the fact.
Timestamps suggest that OTN was the last place you posted to.
Poor forum etiquette.
Why would anyone spend the time to try to give help that you have already received elsewhere? That's a waste of their time.
(Yes, you already received the suggestion to use Dtrace in one of those other sites.)
This thread is locked as irrelevant.

Application running too slow on Sun SPARC T5440 but run normal on sun T5220

Hi all,
I have application running on sun server T5440 1.4 GHz, 95 GB RAM, 32 cores(s), 256 logical (virtual) processor(s), application is running slow on load. when I install my application on another server SPARC-Enterprise-T5220 (UltraSPARC-T2 (chipid 0, clock 1165 MH) , 8GB RAM, 1 core, 8 virtual processors ), application runs smoothly.
Could anyone please help me out what could be the possible reason for this behavior as ideally it should give better performance on T5440 server.
Please find below the additional information from both the servers:
kansparc54143 (/) # uname -a
SunOS kansparc54143 5.10 Generic_144488-17 sun4v sparc SUNW,T5440
kansparc54143 (/) # psrinfo -pv
The physical processor has 64 virtual processors (0-63)
UltraSPARC-T2+ (chipid 0, clock 1414 MHz)
The physical processor has 64 virtual processors (64-127)
UltraSPARC-T2+ (chipid 1, clock 1414 MHz)
The physical processor has 64 virtual processors (128-191)
UltraSPARC-T2+ (chipid 2, clock 1414 MHz)
The physical processor has 64 virtual processors (192-255)
UltraSPARC-T2+ (chipid 3, clock 1414 MHz)
root@kansparc6744 # uname -a
SunOS kansparc6744 5.10 Generic_144488-17 sun4v sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5220
root@kansparc6744 # psrinfo -pv
The physical processor has 8 virtual processors (0-7)
UltraSPARC-T2 (chipid 0, clock 1165 MHz)

1008410 wrote:
I put in the another forum bcoz i didnt get answer on this forum from anyone on this.
... and just like your other post here at the OTN web forums:
https://forums.oracle.com/thread/2554576
this thread is also locked.
You have an active thread at another forum web site that has given you many legitimate responses:
http://www.unix.com/solaris/229269-test-program-running-taking-much-more-time-high-end-server-t5440-than-low-end-server-t5220.html
and you are still responding to those responses.
There is no need to duplicate what is happening there, particularly since you continue to refuse to mention your other web postings (very bad forum manners). If no one knows what you have posted elsewhere they will probably waste their time duplicating what you have already been told. No one here is paid to type a response. This is a user-to-user community forum site.

I recently upgraded to Lion and i find that my computer is running slow and applications are crashing. For example I have Word 2011 for Mac and it crashes all the time I end up losing my work. It often happens when I'm in notebook trying to record.

i recently upgraded to Lion and i find that my computer is running slow and applications are crashing. For example I have Word 2011 for Mac and it crashes all the time I end up losing my work. It often happens when I'm in class using notebook and when I press record my computer starts thinking and it freezes.
Also, I feel that it overheats often and my battery runs out pretty quickly. I had the macbook (black) and this never happened before. I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong or if there is something with my computer.I bought my computer summer 2010, I don't think this should be happening. Please Help......

This is exactly what keeps happening to mine too. I was at a conference taking notes, and I was
using the Notebook template, and doing some audio recording simultaneously. About 3 hours into the conference (not consistently recording, but on and off with the sessions) my file wouldn't save anymore, saying something like "File cannot be modified while in use with another program" and "Invalid file name" when I would go back into my folder to look for it). I tried installing some updates from Microsoft, and when I restarted, I was at least able to open my old notes again, and so far it looks like the audio was working. However, today at the conference, the same thing happened again, but I wasn't actively recording any audio (though after I had copy and pasted my second file of notes into the original, I went back to using it after re-naming it).
Does the crash happen to you under similar cirucumstances? The update might help a little, but it is definitely not the solution. Does anyone have any solutions? Lion shouldn't be this buggy... I moved to Mac to get away from the garbage of bugs and compatibility issues...

SAP B1 APPLICATION IS RUNNING SLOW IN SERVER AFTER UPGRADE

Hi,
The sap application is running slow in server after upgrading it from 9.0 to 9.1 it's taking 5-10 secs to open a document after clicking it and its taking more time in client system.
what are the steps to be taken so that the application will run without any delay.
Regards,
Karthik B

hi please check bellow thread ,it may help you
Client Machines Logon to SAP Server is Very Slow
update the status
regards
AKR

Application running in Solaris 9 container generating core files. what to do?

My solaris 9 zone configuration in solaris 10 looks like:
zonecfg:sms> info
zonename: sms
zonepath: /zone/sms
brand: solaris9
autoboot: true
bootargs:
pool:
limitpriv: default,proc_priocntl,proc_clock_highres,proc_lock_memory,sys_time,priv_proc_priocntl,priv_sys_time,net_rawaccess,sys_ipc_config,priv_proc_lock_memory
scheduling-class:
ip-type: exclusive
hostid:
[max-shm-memory: 4G]
[max-shm-ids: 100]
[max-sem-ids: 100]
fs:
dir: /var
special: /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s5
raw: /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s5
type: ufs
options: []
net:
address not specified
physical: bge0
defrouter not specified
device
match: /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s5
device
match: /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s5
device
match: /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s6
device
match: /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s6
device
match: /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s7
device
match: /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s7
capped-cpu:
[ncpus: 2.00]
capped-memory:
physical: 4G
[swap: 8G]
[locked: 2G]
attr:
name: hostid
type: string
value: 84b18f64
attr:
name: machine
type: string
value: sun4u
rctl:
name: zone.max-sem-ids
value: (priv=privileged,limit=100,action=deny)
rctl:
name: zone.max-shm-ids
value: (priv=privileged,limit=100,action=deny)
rctl:
name: zone.max-shm-memory
value: (priv=privileged,limit=4294967296,action=deny)
rctl:
name: zone.max-swap
value: (priv=privileged,limit=8589934592,action=deny)
rctl:
name: zone.max-locked-memory
value: (priv=privileged,limit=2147483648,action=deny)
rctl:
name: zone.cpu-cap
value: (priv=privileged,limit=200,action=deny)
Solaris 9 zone /etc/system file looks like:
* The directive below is not applicable in the virtualized environment.
* The directive below is not applicable in the virtualized environment.
* The directive below is not applicable in the virtualized environment.
* The directive below is not applicable in the virtualized environment.
* The directive below is not applicable in the virtualized environment.
* The directive below is not applicable in the virtualized environment.
set noexec_user_stack=1
set semsys:seminfo_semmni=100
set semsys:seminfo_semmns=1024
set semsys:seminfo_semmsl=256
set semsys:seminfo_semvmx=32767
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=4294967295
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmin=1
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=100
set shmsys:shminfo_shmseg=10
set rlim_fd_max=65536
set rlim_fd_cur=60000
* The directive below is not applicable in the virtualized environment.
My questions are:
1. Application running in solaris 9 container generating core files. what to do???
2. My prstat -Z for zone shows almost 95% percent cpu usage. what to do???
3. Kindly can share how to move solaris 9 into solaris 10 containers ??

Based on the new questions for the same post you wrote in the other communities, some posts are removed as duplicate, here is the answer :
For the point #3, please look on table 17-1 in the following URL :
Zone Components - System Administration Guide: Oracle Solaris Containers-Resource Management and Oracle Solaris Zones
You can also customize your container /etc/system file but it cannot exceeds the global zone and the zone configuration value.
For the other point, #2, this can be complicated without a complete image of what the complete system do.
Try fist to check if you have not a busy process in your zone, then you can check if a bottleneck exists in the I/O side. You use maybe wrong parameters, a wrong configuration or your system configuration is insufficient in term of resources.
What I can see in the outputs that you provided is that the S9 zone uses the half of the swap space. This can impact your zone performance and I/O activity, and can have in this case a side effect on some processes. Check why your zone uses the swap and how you can remedy this.

I have an ibook g4 os x 10.5.8. running slow on Safari. slow to open applications as well. Any suggestions?

I have an ibook g4 os x 10.5.8. Running slow on latest Safari. Slow to open applications as well. Any suggestions?

Hi, and welcome to Apple Support Communities.
What is the hard drive capacity, and how much space remains available on it? Things can slow down if the hard drive is getting full. It is generally recommended to keep at least 15% of the total capacity of the hard drive free as available space.
How long has it been since you performed any hard drive maintenance? (i.e., repaired the hard drive using Disk Utility from the Mac OS X 10.5 Install disc?)

Macbook air suddenly running slow. Closed all applications, rebooted, doesn't solve the problem. Any ideas?

macbook air suddenly running slow. Closed all applications, rebooted, doesn't solve the problem. Any ideas?

It's very likely that your boot drive is failing. Back up all data immediately and schedule a "Genius" appointment at an Apple Store.

What could be the possible reason for a deployed application to run slow after the target pc comes out of standby mode?

What could be the possible reason for a deployed application to run slow after the target pc comes out of standby mode? PC running XP and using the USB to communicate with the DAQ and driver boards. Application generated with 2010.
Thanks

Hello,
Usually default property is checked
system property -> devices ->usb root -> power management -> allow system to switch off device
Hope this help
Regards
Tinnitus
CLAD / Labview 2011, Win Xp
Mission d'une semaine- à plusieurs mois laissez moi un MP...
RP et Midi-pyrénées .Km+++ si possibilité de télétravail
Kudos always accepted / Les petits clicks jaunes sont toujours appréciés
Don't forget to valid a good answer / pensez à valider une réponse correcte

Why does the application built executable run slower than my developement lib.

The Response given was LabView 5.0.1.f1 specific. Iam however, using LabView 6.i. The Application runs approximatley 3 to 40 times slower than the developement library. Additionally the Write to spreadsheet data is corrupted when using the application executable. Is there a different solution for 6.i ????
Tnx
Len Kraus

That does not sound right. I recommend rebuilding your VI. Beore you do, open the top level VI and press contol-shift-run arrow to perform a manual binary recompile. This makes LabVIEW recompile the whole code. Most times you will not see anything happen but occasionally an error will surface. Be sure to save the VI then rebuild it.
You may also need to reinstall the LabVIEW run time engine and/or LabVIEW. I would start with the run time engine first.

Application runs slower on Solaris

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for