Approach for O365 mails (pros and cons of both)

Hi Team - What is the right approach to access seamless, flawless emails of O365 in our laptops having Mavericks OS and MailMail . Is Office 2011 for MAC the right choice or should we stick to native MailMail for O365 mails (pros and cons of both).
We attempted with native messaging client but are facing lots of issues related to synchronization, delay, missouts etc... & we are not sure if we shift our users to Office 2011 for MAC, that will fix up the issues.
Please advise..
Best regards,

Database Register in two way :
1.) Static Instance Registration
2.) Dynamic Instance Registration
** Static Instance Registration:
add the entries in $ORACLE_HOME\NETWORK\ADMIN\listener.ora file or by using the GUI
LISTENER =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = xx.xx.xx.xx)(PORT = 1521))
)When you check Listener status --> unknown because no mechanism to guarantee that the specified status even exists.
**Dynamic Instance Registration
or service registration , registration is performed by the PMON process an instance background process of each database and doesn't need any configuration in the listener.ora
Read
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/network.111/b28317/listener.htm

Similar Messages

Neptune for UI development Pros and Cons

Hi ,
we are evaluating neptune for UI development for what are the pros and cons of using neptune.
i see only that webdynpro abap developer can be easily moved to neptune , some javascript knowledge is still required.
some question
1) can neptune make calls to odata services ? do that requires code in javascript or ABAP
2) any accelerators provided by neptune like for workflow scenarios , list and details .
3) can sap standard fiori apps extensibility or modification is possible through neptune
4) security if its accessing business functionality directly
regards
Yashpal

Hi Yashpal,
I will give you my view, but as Robbe says I work for the company and other SAP developers like DJ Adams has other development tool preferences than me ( I call his Sublime Text development spaghetti coding and he sees Neptune as a crutch that restricts a developer's freedom but this is just a friendly point-of-view discussion and I have promised him a beer in Walldorf next time our paths cross there)
So the important message is that SAP has opened up their platform for different development tools and it is now a choice for the individual developer or SAP customer. This is a fantastic move by SAP and I think a bit overlooked by the community, Look at the new Xamarin partnership as an example (and yes they are a competitor, but I did mention them )
Now the pros of Neptune are in my opinion:
ABAP developer friendly development (removed 90% of JavaScripting needed)
Connected to the SAP transport System (Software Logistics as is)
Drag Drop designer that gives structured code (easy for a new developer to take over code, compared to the spaghetti provided by DJ <- I'll need to buy a few extra beers for that remark)
Native json communication provided by the Neptune Server (you can argue all you want about Odata, our solution is more flexible gives incredible performance and superb and easy to use offline capabilities)
Integration with Adobe build, use an SAP program to generate hybrid apps (The average ABAP developer does not install cordova and build hybrid apps - with Neptune he/she does)
Integration with SMP. Automatic connection with the REST API's of SMP both on-premise and in the Cloud
Reduced time to market. One of the largest SAP implementation partners in the Nordics stated that Neptune reduced development time by 80%
Free templates (Advanced templates such as fully functional PM, HCM, SD templates are available Experience | Neptune Software <- sorry for the marketing but you did ask)
UI5, all of the other third-party tools (Not SAP tools like App Builder, Eclipse etc) uses non UI5 frameworks. I personally believe that SAPUI5 (UI5) is the future of SAP UX and thus it only makes sense to keep a common and future-proof framework.
Network crunching. We optimize all networking. Which makes sense for mobility.
no extra infrastructure needed - it is a certified add-on and takes 15 mins to install.
Works with most versions of SAP. We even have alot of customers using 4.7 (we need the ICF so nothing lower). This is something the community often forgets. Yes it is cool to play with the latest Netweaver release, but do our customers have that installed?
Cons (woot!)
Cost, even if Neptune is very affordable it still requires license for productive usage (free for developers though - and hey we need to live as well ) So custom coding is cheaper in respect to license (but not in TCO in my opinion)
Generated code, even if we have added as much freedom to code custom JavaScript as possible there will always be restrictions in generated code compared to notepad. (But I haven't met an issue that couldn't be solved by custom coding in the Neptune Application Designer yet)
Other backend systems. Neptune is based on ABAP and as such it obviosly works best with an ABAP backend.
.... (Add stuff from other non Neptune ppl )
Regarding your questions:
1. Yes you can use Odata, best way is to consume it on the ABAP level, but you can of course consume it through JavaScript as well (Not recomended by me)
2. Yes see above (free templates and also premium templates by our partners)
3. No you can't modify a fiori app with Neptune, but the two solutions work perfectly together (You can add Neptune apps in the Fiori launchpad) One of our partners have created an RDS solution based on both Fiori and Neptune.
4. Neptune is an add-on to Netweaver and as such has no extra security in itself beyond that (And we seek not to do that). But we support any security you wish to add on top. I strongly advice having a look at the SAP Secure offering (App protection and MDM) as well as SMP (also the new Cloud edition which gives easy affordable protection for your backend)
So that was my very biased answer
Njål

WSUS vs SCCM SUP - What is the point of changing? Pros and Cons of both

Hi,
I have been using WSUS forever and have just made a very painful change over to SCCM 2012 SUP. In a room full of experienced WSUS users and facing a handover of SCCM SUP, I really need to have this question answered - What, if any, are the advantages of
SCCM2012 SUP over WSUS. It's certainly not ease of use, ease of implementation or understandability.
Even if i accept that yes, they are two different things now and i shouldn't think of SCCM as being like WSUS, I still have to compare and contrast, honestly, what they do and how they do it
WSUS is ridiculously easy in comparison to SUP. With WSUS, I install it, create some GPOs and assign to OUs. I create security groups and add the servers in scope to to thoise groups and those security groups to the policy. I have different groups set up
to keep separation of DCs and APP servers and SQL and SCCM and Antivirus servers and workstations
If needs be i have a text list of all my servers/workstations and can individually target using PSEXEC to run wuauclt on any number of clients. It works great and is easily understandable
Now, enter SCCM 2010 and SUP.
The first thing i HAD to know was the last thing i learned. And not from Microsoft.That is that there is really only one method now, imposed by limitations on Software Update Groups and Deployment packages. You can only create a package of 1000 or less updates
This means chopping up your historic updates and having them deployed as a separate strategy from your newer updates cycles
Secondly, every month from now on you will need to create and sort your updates into a meaningful Update Group and Deployment package - even if you set up an Automatic Deployment rule, you still need to manually create your Update Groups
You can only have one deployment package per update group and will need one software update group per "type" of install (available or Required) AND you will need one software update group and deployment package PER COLLECTION!
To make this work as simply as possible, it will mean having two collections Available and Required (for example)
Each collection will have a SUG associated with it (each with a limit of 1000 updates remember). Each group of circa 1000 updates takes about 2+ hours to compile and you will have a minimum of 5 groups per collection to get up to October 2014
After this your ADRs should now do it all for you but lack the ability to create update groups so you have to do this manually every month beforehand. Whew!!
Thirdly, in the background, WSUS still downloads metadata. In SCCM you should be pointing every update group manually to this folder. Same with Deployment packages and ADRs. Why is this not built-in - intuitive? These are then copied and downloaded as full
packages into their respectively (manually) created source folders
Now, when updates expire or are superseded, you have to manually replace them from each SUG
And also quite a big thing i havent heard anyone else comment on, is the fact that these updates are now NOT shown in the Windows Update feature - they now appear in the Software Center - so now the Servers i sent "Available" updates have to be
logged onto and manually installed - instead of being able to individually target them like i did with PSEXEC and wuauclt
And logging?? There are at least 100 different logs to look at using the Trace Log Tool. It's a full time job just figuring out what logs to look at to resolve any problems
This is, in my opinion, a really poor effort and the documentaion is wildly inconsistent across many forums.
Some kind of standard document is needed. And i say this after having followed Microsoft's own documentation and using technet forums
I, for one, just need one BIG question answered for now - how do i remove the SCCM SUP client and revert back to wuauclt on all my clients - if i remove SUP from SCCM will it remove the client from the clients?

HI Jason,
I have spent a long time trying to get this to work. My requirements are to have WSUS deploy updates automatically with as little intervention as possible and to be able to explain and show the process to others who will administer the system long after
I've gone
The reason I still have to think of things in the WSUS way is that I have a broken update infrastructure that doesn't do what my requirements are. So I now currently need to log into all my "Available " Servers to update them manually instead of
being able to remotely execute the updates. I'll look at the SDK but this is the first time I've heard of it
From the top - yes I agree that's a typo it's Update Goups that can only have 1000 updates. Do you agree that this causes a problem for this scenario? Updates since before 2013 amount to several thousand and so I have to break these up into groups of 1000
- one each for Available and Required groups. That means 8 groups straight away
Having to cater for these historic updates means painfully waiting 2 hours or so for each package to be created. I've done this already and its not pretty but its essential (unless I'm doing it wrong but I am following TechNet forums)
My ADRs will absolutely not create the Update Groups and the docs I have read also say that this is a manual monthly process - Create a Group every month and then use an ADR to use that group - is that not correct?
Update groups - you are mixing my words up and saying the same thing in a different way - "Update groups can absolutely have multiple deployments targeted to different collections" change the "can" for a "must" and you see my
problem. You cannot create a single Update Group, package it up and the deploy it to both Available and Required groups. You need two update groups for this. One for available and one for Required.
Metadata - OK then what is it that WSUS downloads to E:\WSUS\WsusContent\... ? And why is this to be set as the download location for any Update Group, Deployment Package or ADR?? I have to create or select a deployment package which is another
manually created folder under "sources" for which the download location is set to my WSUS folder. This doesn't work unless I set my download location to Microsoft. But WSUS should already have synced in the background to WsusContent so why would
I want to download from Microsoft. And I only want to actually download the "approved" packages. So as far as I'm aware the WSUS\WsusContent folder only contains metadata which is not downloaded until required. Am I wrong? What/who/how downloads
the binaries and when?
Lastly, What doesn't make sense? The goal used to be automation. If and when I needed to, I used to be able to manually intervene for single or multiple devices using PSEXEC to run wuauclt. With SCCM I can see for example, 2x non compliant devices just now.
In the old days I would just psexec onto them and run wuauclt. In SCCM I err... Hmmm.. what? What do I do? Will look at the SDK
Just one other thing - is there no way at all to continue to use the Windows UPdate control panel and have it show the same available updates as Software Centre? Why can SCCM not just work like Windows Update does? If I run Windows Update on any server it
says up do date but if go to Microsoft to check it always comes back with updates
I just want my internal SCCM SUP to work the same way Microsoft updates works for an internet connected computer. Completely Automatic. No intervention. My group of Availabel servers I would like to be able to remotely and individually install from either
a central console or a script. Again, I will look at the SDK for this
Thanks for your reply and advice. I'll give it one more week. ;-)

Pros and Cons of Turning CE On or Managment Of Global Employees.

Hi Guys,
We have a requirement where we have to deal with the employees those holds two jobs, those can be in a different country or within the same country. We have a option to go with concurrent employment or we can go towards the old functionality of managment of global employees concept. My Question here is very specific to what are the pros and cons in both the scenarios. If some one can elaborate it a little or any documentation is available to compare both the plans.
Any answers would be highly appreciated. Thanks
Regards.

Hi Hassan,
We are currently working to implement Management of Global Employees (MGE).
Check out http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/22/e15a287d14f74c853f4bf8ab5fd4b1/frameset.htm and http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/a8/3300b1e299cd4c9fa78c8ad4aab007/frameset.htm
for details.
Remember, before implementing by activating CCURE GLEMP or CCURE MAINS, you must contact Michael Wulf at SAP via an OSS Note.
MGE is the functionality to handle various assignments between countries for employees so that the employee could be paid and/or have benefits in each country. It also enables additional infotypes to track the preparation and process of the global assignment.
Concurrent Employment (CE) is designed so that one individual can have multiple assignments within one country, with different pay rates, benefits, etc. Example is a school administrator who works 40 hours and then at night is an adjunct instructor for the school. If concurrent pay is activated, that individual could be processed in two different payrolls at different pay dates, but the system knows it is one person for taxes, SSN deductions, etc.
So really CE and MGE are two different functionalities to meet different requirements, but they each utilize the same foundation - the Person ID and an individual having more than one PERNR.
Paul

Pros and cons of select for update clause

hi,
Can anybody explain what are the
pros and cons of select for update clause
11.2.0.1

As commented, there are no pros versus cons in this case.
What is important is to understand conceptually what this do and why it would be use.
Conceptually, a select for update reads and locks row(s). It is known as pessimistic locking.
Why would you want to do that? Well, you have a fat client (Delphi for example) and multiple users. When userA updates an invoice, you want that invoice row(s) locked and prevent others from making updates at the same time. Without locking, multiple users updating the same invoice will result in existing updated data being overwritten by old data that also has been updated. A situation called lost updates.
For web based clients that are stateless, pessimistic locking does not work - as the clients do not have state and pessimistic locking requires state. Which means an alternative method to select for update needs to be used to prevent lost updates. This method is called optimistic locking.
So it is not about pros versus cons. It is about understanding how the feature/technique/approach works and when to use it.. and when it is not suited to use it. All problems are not nails. All solutions are not the large hammer for driving in nails.

Pros and cons for transport management in XI

Hi experts,
Among the several tools proposed by SAP to manage transports (File Export, import tool, CMS and CMS tracks, CTS+), do you know have any pros and cons from SAP as to what is the preferred approach, the industry learnings...? What is better to use and in which case ?
Thanks a lot in advance, any help would be appreciated.
Kind regards,
Jamal

hi
check the blog for filesystem transport vs CMS
XI Software Logistics II: Overview
Best Practices for Implementing CTS+
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10456aac-44f7-2a10-1fbe-8b7bcd7bcd58
additionally
XI Software Logistics Solution III: CMS
XI Software Logistics Solution III: CMS
XI Software Logistics II: Overview
XI Software Logistics II: Overview
XI Software Logistics 1: SLD Preparation
XI Software Logistics 1: SLD Preparation
regards
kummari
Edited by: kummari on Jul 30, 2008 10:21 AM

HT204053 What are the pros and cons of 1) choosing to use the SAME Apple ID for iCloud services on one side, and purchases on the iTunes Store, App Store, and iBookstore, on the other side; or 2) to have and use two separate Apple Ids for these "two sides

All is in the title, so I repeat it below with a better identation.
What are the pros and cons of
1) choosing to use the SAME
Apple ID for iCloud services on one side, and
purchases on the iTunes Store, App Store, and iBookstore, on the other side; or
2) to have and use two separate Apple Ids for these "two sides"?
P.S.
I have loads and loads of free podcasts in iTunes in my iMac, that are certainly more thant the 5 gigas the iCloud provides for free, so I don't want those to go to the cloud. But this is perhaps a different question...
Also need to mention that I have itunes on a mac, a pc and an iphone.
Sorry to look so silly with this question, but I don't get the "big picture".

You need to create a user account for your wife (or yourself depending on who has the current user account). When syncing, each of you should sign in as a separate user, login to iTunes and then sync. I had this problem when my sister got an iPhone. When we did her initial sync, everything on my iPhone showed up on hers. Apple gave me this solution.

What are the pros and cons of installing java+abap stack for portal?

Hi all,
1.What are the pros and cons of installing java+abap stack for portal?
2.what effect it does on the ume options to be choosen??
3.for the purpose of integration of r3,bw and crm on portal and crm 4.0 60.2.3 business package which option of stack(java or abap or both)will be good option and which ume option while installation should be choosen?
regards
Rajendra

Hi Rajendra,
The NetWeaver Installation Master Guide offers some good scenarios on the pros and cons:
https://websmp201.sapag.de/~sapidb/011000358700005412792005E.pdf
In a nutshell:
ABAP+JAVA
Pros
- Decrease # of servers required to administer the portal
- Less costly
Cons
- Upgrades could be dependent on ABAP and Java release level
- Additional load on the server due to ABAP stack
- Limited scalability
JAVA and ABAP on separate server
Pros
- Improved performance
- Allows each system to be single-use purpose therefore downtime does not affect other components
- More scalable
Cons
- Adds complexity to landscape
- Additional costs
Regards,
Thomas Pham

Same SID for QA & Prd systems - pros and cons?

We have the foll systems:
1. Enterprise Portal 7.0
2. NWDI 7.0
3. NW 7.0 (with XECO - Ecommerce)
4. TREX 7.1
5. Content Server 6.40
6. ECC 6.0
Currently the QA and Prd systems have the same SID and system/instance no, although they are on different hosts.
We would like to know what are the long term pros and cons for keeping the QA and Prd SIDs the same for all systems.
We are already making a list, so thought we might as well get more inputs from the community too.
We already have this arrangement for the past 3 months and have not faced any major issues.
A couple of cons though:
1. Cannot use solman as it cannot distinguish between the diff servers with same SID
2. ABAP transports from QA to Prd have to be manually done (cannot use STMS)
Thanks
Prasad

Hi Manoj,
Changing the SID of java systems is a very tedious procedure. Hom sys copy is just a part of the SID change...there are a whole lot of configs to be done after that...the task is eq to a new setup of systems
For once, the efforts put in are huge..you can see there are 5 systems..besides, it will involve coordination from all teams - basis, development, functional, project management.
Here are a few advantages that we know of:
1. No efforts reqd to change back to original SID
2. During disaster recovery, we just have to restore the production database on QA and change the hostname, whereas its not so in case of having diff SIDs
3. For end-users this will be transparent because they will be using the hostname in the URL which is anyways different
We have the same SIDs for the past 3 months and have not seen major issues, but we also would like to know from the long term perspective if there are any risks that we have not foreseen...hence we seek help from the community.
Hope its clear now
Thanks for your response
Prasad

What are the pros and cons of using people keywords, given that my catalogue is already uptodate with regular keywording of all subjects? e.g., will the people keyword transfer to other programs?, can I use the same name for a people keyword and regular

What are the pros and cons of using people keywords, given that my catalog is already up to date with regular keywording of all subjects? e.g., will the people keyword transfer to other programs?, can I use the same name for a people keyword and regular keyword in the same photo?

What are the pros and cons of using people keywords, given that my catalog is already up to date with regular keywording of all subjects? e.g., will the people keyword transfer to other programs?, can I use the same name for a people keyword and regular keyword in the same photo?

Pros and cons in setting AD domain trust into my AD domain for more than 10+ AD domain and some with same FQDN or label ?

Hi,
Can someone please share what is the pros and Cons of trusting AD domain for more than 10 different AD sites into my existing single domain forest let say ParentCompany.com ?
At the moment I only have one single forest AD domain with the Domain and Forest functionality Windows Server 2003. The main domain controller FSMO role holder is in the Data Center spread across three different VMs running on Windows Server 2008 R2.
The main/parent company has acquired smaller business chain of 15+ offices in which they have their own Domain Controller and also their own domain, sometimes they also got the same AD domain between them (no trust or whatsoever in those 15+ AD domain).
Sounds crazy but yes, there is no standardization in them or whoever manage their IT infrastructure previously.
I'm now considering what are the benefits of creating the AD domain and trust versus importing those AD objects into my domain and then decommission them.
No need to worry about Exchange Server since all of the user in those sites connecting to the RDS to my ParentCompany.com terminal servers.
My requirements or goal are as follows:
1. Simplify the AD domain structure & maintenance
2. Try to avoid the disruptions of the user in terms of downtime and selecting multiple different domain everytime they login to their PC or SharePoint sites.
any kind of help and suggestion would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
/* Server Support Specialist */

Can someone please share what is the pros and Cons of trusting AD domain for more than 10 different
AD sites into my existing single domain forest let say ParentCompany.com ?
I think you mean 10 AD domains.
Managing multiple domains can be difficult for administration. I usually recommend using a single domain in a single forest with OUs to separate resources whenever it is possible.
However, if you can't do that then you can simply create trust relationships between your domains. The advantage is that you can enable access to resources to different domains. I do not see cons here.
The main/parent company has acquired smaller business chain of 15+ offices in which they have
their own Domain Controller and also their own domain, sometimes they also got the same AD domain between them (no trust or whatsoever in those 15+ AD domain). Sounds crazy but yes, there is no standardization in them or whoever manage their IT infrastructure
previously.
I'm now considering what are the benefits of creating the AD domain and trust versus importing those
AD objects into my domain and then decommission them.
I would recommend consolidating your domains into a single one. ADMT is a migration tool that you can use. The advantage would be the ease of administration. Also, by having multiple DCs for the same domain across sites, you will take benefit of High Availability
of your and DRP.
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
Ahmed MALEK
My Website Link
My Linkedin Profile
My MVP Profile

Pros and cons of using disksets for SUNW.HAStoragePlus

Hi,
untill now we were usign disksets for SUNW.HAStoragePlus for installing HA Oracle on both Sun Cluster 3.1 and 3.2.
On the article ( http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/features/articles/cluster3.1_oracle10g.pdf ) with the title "Installing and Configuring Sun Cluster 3.1 Software for Oracle Database 10g HA" the author prefers using just the disk devices for SUNW.HAStoragePlus.
What are the pros and cons of using disksets for disks you'll use for SUNW.HAStoragePlus?
I think that if you do not need to add more than one disk to a diskset there's no need to to use disksets. So, you can eliminate a problematic layer such as SDS. What do you thnik and which option do you prefer?
Murat BALKAS

some more details :
On " Chapter 4 . Configuring SolarisVolume Manager Software" of "Sun Cluster Data Service 16 for Oracle Guide for Solaris OS"
(http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2980?l=en&q=Sun+CLuster+3.2 ) SDS disksets we use for HA-Oracle installations is explained in detail.
     Our procedure to create diskset to locate Oracle files is attached.
     After reading the article, I realized that using disksets is not a
must for filesystems to be mounted as SUNW.HAStoragePlus. If yes, I
would prefer using the disk devices directly instead of putting them
on disksets so that I can eliminate one for layer which is the problematic SDS layer.
     Our disk devices ( below /dev/did/rdsk/d9 and /dev/did/rdsk/d12 ) are
disk partitions from a RAID-5 logical drive on the storage.
* Create the disksets required for HA-ORACLE files
root@vasdb1 # metaset -s oraset10fs -a -h vasdb1 vasdb2
root@vasdb1 # metaset -s oraset10fs -a -m vasdb1 vasdb2
root@vasdb1 # metaset -s oraset10fs -a /dev/did/rdsk/d9
/dev/did/rdsk/d12
root@vasdb1 # metainit -s oraset10fs d325 1 1 /dev/did/rdsk/d12s0
oraset10fs/d325: Concat/Stripe is setup
root@vasdb1 # metainit -s oraset10fs d305 1 1 /dev/did/rdsk/d9s0
oraset10fs/d305: Concat/Stripe is setup
root@vasdb2 # newfs /dev/md/oraset10fs/rdsk/d305
* Change the ownership of newly created devices to use by Oracle
installation owner.
root@vasdb1 # chown oracle10:dba /dev/md/oraset10/rdsk/d*
root@vasdb1 # chown oracle10:dba /dev/md/oraset10/dsk/d*
root@vasdb2 # chown oracle10:dba /dev/md/oraset10/rdsk/d*
root@vasdb2 # chown oracle10:dba /dev/md/oraset10/dsk/d*
* Make required directories on both nodes for mountpoints
root@vasdb2 # cd /global
root@vasdb2 # mkdir oracle10
root@vasdb1 # cd /global/
root@vasdb1 # mkdir oracle10
* Add directories to vfstab on both nodes
root@vasdb2 # more /etc/vfstab
/dev/md/oraset10/dsk/d325 /dev/md/oraset10/rdsk/d325 /global/oracle10
ufs 2 no logging
* Create raw deivces for using as redolog files.
root@lbsdb1 # metainit -s oraset d312 -p d305 1025M
d302: Soft Partition is setup
root@lbsdb1 # metainit -s oraset d313 -p d305 1025M
d303: Soft Partition is setup
root@lbsdb1 # metainit -s oraset d314 -p d305 1025M
d304: Soft Partition is setup
root@lbsdb1 # metainit -s oraset d315 -p d305 1025M
d305: Soft Partition is setup
root@lbsdb1 # metainit -s oraset d316 -p d305 1025M
d306: Soft Partition is setup
root@lbsdb1 # metainit -s oraset d317 -p d305 1025M
d307: Soft Partition is setup
root@lbsdb1 # metainit -s oraset d318 -p d305 1025M
d308: Soft Partition is setup
root@lbsdb1 # metainit -s oraset d319 -p d305 1025M
d309: Soft Partition is setup
* Register
root@vasdb1 # scrgadm -a -L -j oraset10fs-lh -g oraset10fs-rg -l
oraset10fs-IP -n net1@vasdb1,net2@vasdb2
root@vasdb1 # scrgadm -a -t SUNW.HAStoragePlus:2
root@vasdb2 # scrgadm -a -j oracle10-hastp-rs-raw -g oraset10-rg -t
SUNW.HAStoragePlus:2 -x
GlobalDevicePaths=oraset10,/dev/md/oraset10/rdsk/d305 -x
AffinityOn=TRUE
root@vasdb2 # scrgadm -a -j oracle10-hastp-rs-fs -g oraset10-rg -t
SUNW.HAStoragePlus:2 -x FilesystemMountPoints=/global/oracle10 -x
AffinityOn=TRUE
root@vasdb2 # scswitch -e -j oracle10-hastp-rs-fs
root@vasdb2 # scswitch -e -j oracle10-hastp-rs-raw

Pros and Cons for single sales organization and multiple sales organization

Hi!
Does anybody have a good data of Pros and Cons for Single Sales Organization vs. Multiple Sales Organization.
Thank you!

Hi,
Actuall it all depends on the business process.
I will explain the answer to you through a practical example
like Ford, it has sales and services all across globe.
It is not advisable to manage all of its activities under only one sales organization, say Ford Inc.
So what it does is de-centralises the whole process according to the country, region so that the whole process is divided and hence can be managed more effeciently.
Hope this helps you in understanding the basics.
One sales org always provides you with very less data to update and maintain, while many sales org makes the scenario more complex.
One sales org always gives you the flexibility to bring any changes to the current scenario, while in multiple sales org to bring a change its a tiresome job.
These are some of the advantages and disadvantages of one to many sales org.
regards,
Siddharth.

What are the pros and cons of a solid state drive for imac?

What are the pros and cons of a solid state drive for imac?
I wonder if the SSD is good for replacing a failing hard drive?

However they are dramatically faster than magnetic disk drives, useful for startup and shutdown and frequently accessed apps and fi.e

Pros and cons for posing video to youtube for use in iWeb

Hello
Can someone explain the pros and cons of posting video to YouTube for use in an iWeb website instead of iDisk?
Thanks
Carl

Carl ~ Some of the following points have already been mentioned above, but anyway...
Pros for posting videos to YouTube are:
Viewers of your video wouldn't be using up your limited .Mac data transfer allowance.
Once your site is published, if subsequently you have to do a +Publish All+ from iWeb, you wouldn't be uploading your video yet again to .Mac ~ saving time and usage of your limited .Mac data transfer allowance.
YouTube videos have a wide audience and popular features such as ratings, playlists, comments, etc.
Cons for posting videos to YouTube are:
Limitations on size and quality of videos and their unappealing presentation style. For example, compare YouTube's presentation style and limited size options with that of a +.Mac Web Gallery+:
http://gallery.mac.com/emily_parker#100471
Perhaps a compromise would be to post your videos to YouTube (for the publicity) and link from your iWeb site to a +.Mac Web Gallery+ (for its elegance and avoidance of iWeb re-publishing it.)

Approach for O365 mails (pros and cons of both)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for