Approval Index in Application controlled WF

Hi All
I am working on Application controlled WF. I created a implementation for the BAdI- BBP_WFL_APPROV_BADI. In the method- GET_REMAING_APPROVERS, one of the importing parameter is ACTUAL_APPROVAL_INDEX.
While i am creating SC (from portal), if i click on Approval Process Overview button, BAdI is getting with Approval_Index as 000000 and if i order the SC, BAdI is getting with Approval_Index as 000000.
Please let me know, always the approval index will be 00000 (initially) and do we need to increase the approval index inside the BAdI?
Vinoth

Hi,
you are taking two different things.. ACTUAL_APPROVAL_INDEX is import parameter of the Badi, But Approval_Index is part of the approval_table which is exporting parameter of the Baid..
the approval index must be increased based on number of level you wants the sc to be approved..for an example..
you want a SC to be approved by 4 levels of approver's then the approval_table must be appended as follows
approval_index = 1
1st approver details.
approval_index = 2
2nd approver details.
approval_index = 3
3rd approver details.
approval_index = 4
4th approver details.
ACTUAL_APPROVAL_INDEX is import parameter of the Badi is update dynamically once the approver take the decision for an example.. Assume that the 3rd level approver approve the sc.. now the ACTUAL_APPROVAL_INDEX is 3..
Saravanan

Similar Messages

Approval Level in Process Controlled workflows

Hi Sap Gurus,
How can i find the number of approval levels in process controlled workflows for Shopping Cart, Purchase Order....
Thanks in advance

Hello,
IMG: SAP Implementation Guide > SAP Supplier Relationship Management > SRM Server > Cross-Application Basic Settings > Business Workflow > Process-Controlled Workflow > Business Process Configuration > Define Process Levels
For concerned object type, select "Process Schema Definition" directory.
Then, select correct process level schema to display "Process Level Configuration" directory: here are the process levels defined.
Regards.
Laurent.

Problem in setting default index in Tree Control

hi all,
i am using flex2.0 final release and in my application i am
calling custom function in cretionComplete event
which set the default index in Tree control...but its not
working properly in final flex meanwhile this same thing i am using
in flex beta3 ...at that time its working properly but the problem
occur only in migration time so can any body tell me what happaning
here...
code....//here MailFolderLists is id of tree control
[Bindable]
public var XLC:XML;
public function initList(event:Event) : void
if(mx.utils.ObjectUtil.toString(event.target.lastResult).indexOf("NOK")==-1)
XLC = event.target.lastResult;
if(MailFolderLists.selectedIndex==-1) //its working
MailFolderLists.selectedIndex=0; // its not working
so plz give me solution aasp..
thanks in advance

thanks buddy
ur suggestion work ....
one more thing i want to know if u have any idea related to
Tree.expandItem method it will work fine in beta3 but same prob not
work perfectly in final flex.....
i am using
MailFolderLists.expandItem(MailFolderLists.selectedItem,
true);
but not work every time i want the tree in expan position
every when i add and new node/folder into it..
so give me suggestion if u have any idea...
thanks

Side Effects of switching from Application Controlled Workflow to Process

We have switched our development environmnet from application controlled workflow to process controlled workflow. We noticed that when we try to pull up old shopping carts that are awaiting approval we get dumps.
Is this a known issue when converting from application controlled workflow to processing controlled workflow?
Regards,
-Paul

Hi,
What kind of dump did you get?
My understanding is it should work if SC is created in SRM 7.0 with AC workflow.
Regards,
Masa

SRM7.0 Application controlled workflow need Allow/Disallow to edit fields f

Dear All,
We using SRM7.0 Application controlled workflow,Now we need Allow/Disallow to edit fields for approver,how to do it,About Process controlled workflow,we can according to the notes 1277921 do it,But Application controlled workflow,I didn't find any notes,Can you help it.

Hi,
Here is the SAP help for your reference. Please let us know if you need more information..
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm70/helpdata/en/29/b092ecfcb24b14b7baa225ba13955b/frameset.htm
Saravanan

Application control

Hi all,
could you help me with finding the answer for the following question?
Is it possible in Peoplesoft to have different application controls settings on different client codes within one instance? I'm more familiar with SAP and I'm just trying to discover Peoplesoft more, so I'll use example from SAP. In SAP it's possible to set the 3-way match (Invoice is matched against both the Purchase Order and Goods Receipt) in under one client code, but the setting can be disabled under another client code. Another example would be having set certain reports or configurations differently at different client codes.
The aim is to know whether I have to review just one settings or have to review settings/configurations for each individual client code.
Thank you very much in advance.
Tomas

1. PeopleSoft dont have code on client side instead it has code on server side.
2. In PeopleSoft we can do 2 way and 3 way matching, one user settings can be disabled from another user. All these are controlled by PeopleSoft Security
3. PeopleSoft can set certain reports or configurations differently at different users.
You can control one user settings from another user but all this is controlled by PeopleSoft Security. It is very powerful application in which you can do many miracles.
Jayaprakash Tedla

CUP 5.3: Mitigating from Request and approval of new created control

Hi,
I have activated in RAR that new created controls need to be approved and this works fine when creating the control in RAR.
when creating the mitigating control from CUP within the request with the "Mitigate"-button the control is created directly in RAR without starting the approval workflow the new controls.
Is this a bug or do I need to configured somewhere that the workflow should be also triggered when a control is created via CUP?
Best regards
Marco

Hi Marco,
I know this is an important functionality but it is not available in CUP as of now. Some of my customers are looking for this. You should open an enhancement request for this. I have also encouraged my clients to open an enhancement request for this. I am hoping SAP fixes this ASAP.
Regards,
Alpesh

S-note Failure for Fiori Approve Purchase Order application

Is it mandatory to implement s-note 2035014 to implement Fiori - Approve Purchase Order Application . This particular snote fails repeatedly in our system.
The system details are :
ERP 6 EHP 6 with basis 7.31
NWG- SP08 on embedded deployment
.Attached is the screenshot of it:
Regards
Virinchy
Tags edited by: Michael Appleby

Hi Virinchy,
It is program correction note for the issue described in the note 2035014.
Regards, Masa
SAP Customer Experience Group - CEG

Align picture to far left on application control bar

guys i realise that the application control bar has a 1px padding from each side but is there a way to remove that padding so that i may align the Img right up to the far left of the control bar?
Any help would be appreciated.

such a simple solution and i just couldnt think of it. :-) thanks

BatteryWatch is requesting changes to its application control permissions

I am using an ad-supported application called BatteryWatch (1.9.7) and everything used to be fine.
Now, however, everytime I open it I get the request "BatteryWatch is requesting changes to its application control permissions."
No matter how I change the permissions, this message ALWAYS appears.
The strange thing is that it didn't use to happen before.
Since the time that it was working I have updated the application, updated Blackberry App World and I think the company might have moved onto BES/BIS(?).
Any idea how I can stop this message appearing?

Hi and Welcome to the Community!
If your company indeed did move to BES and if indeed your BB has been activated on BES, then BES could be pushing out specific control permissions that are in conflict with what that app thinks it needs...and BES will win every time. So, when you launch the app, it prompts for a change to the permissions to what it thinks it needs...but, since BES is in control, it can't actually change the permission, and prompts again the next time.
Basically, there is nothing you can do...BES wins every time.
Good luck!
Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
Join our BBM Channels
BSCF General Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

ZMM 2.5 Policy Suite, Application Control, Whitelisting

Reference: Novell Documentation: ZENworks Mobile Management - Table of Contents
The ZMM manuals are not quite clear what they mean by "Whitelisting" under the Policy Suite, Application Control sections. I'm assuming ZMM application "whitelisting" means that only listed apps can run or at least only listed apps can be installed and run. Is assumption correct? Has anyone done this successfully on Android devices with the ZMM agent an enrolled Touchdown? If so, could you provide details on how it was done? Ideally we'd like to take an inventory list of a working device set of applications, add them to the whitelist, and force the user to come to the administrator for new applications, regardless of their google play/alternative market access.
Thoughts?
Kevin

Originally Posted by nop1983
salisburyk wrote:
>
> Reference:
> 'SureLock for Android | Kiosk Mode Lockdown for Tablets, Smartphones &
> Rugged Devices' (SureLock for Android | Kiosk Mode Lockdown for Tablets, Smartphones & Rugged Devices)
>
> Bryce,
>
> Another very interesting product is SureLock for Android - we are
> testing it to see how it compliments Novell ZMM...
>
> Kevin
This looks like a Endpoint security product for Android, right?
Niels
Hi Niels,
Did you happen see the link? No, the SureLock product allows Application Control/Application whitelisting right on the android device with full administrator control. We wrongly thought ZMM could whitelist Android apps (shame on us - we neglected to test that before we purchased. Lessons learned - give yourself time to test everything in your requirements list prior to purchase). Our initial testing of SureLock went very smoothly, it does not interfere with the ZMM agent or Touchdown. The users see only what you want them to see - apparently even without root access on the android device. We are now using it in conjunction with ZMM on our Mobile devices. There are others that offer similar functionality in conjunction with ZMM - take a look at Clutch Mobile App Protector Pro that is coming soon for iOS as well ( https://www.clutchmobile.com/products/appprotector ). We do not have iOS, so SureLock is fine for our needs in conjunction with ZMM...
Kevin

Best Web Filter and Application control for K-12 School using Chromebooks

Sophos UTM has good education pricing and provides all this and a lot more
Wil replace the firewall and has excellent web filtering and application control
Also nice features for education like allowing google apps but limiting to your google domain

We are currently using Barracuda Web Filter (410) with a Watchguard firewall. This school year we are launching Google for Education with 160 Chromebooks to start the program.
We need to upgrade our webfilter and are considering another Barracuda as well as Litespeed, Websense and perhaps OpenDNS.
is there anyone who is in a similar situation that has some recommendation?
Here are a few more details:
School is 900+ students
300 wired workstations
Active directory environment
Ruckus Wireless with 30+ access points
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

BUG: Docked Application Control Bar breaks States

I've encountered a bug and I haven't noticed messages from
anyone else about it so I'm assuming it's an unknown:
If you use an Application Control Bar, set it's dock property
to true, and then attempt to change the currentState of the
application to a state that would result in the Application Control
Bar to be removed; the state change fails.
Here's an example:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<mx:Application xmlns:mx="
http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"
layout="absolute">
<mx:states>
<mx:State name="problemState">
<mx:AddChild relativeTo="{textarea1}"
position="before">
<mx:Button x="368.5" y="323" label="Goto Base State"
click="currentState="""/>
</mx:AddChild>
<mx:AddChild position="lastChild">
<mx:ApplicationControlBar x="170" y="221" dock="true"
id="appControlBar">
</mx:ApplicationControlBar>
</mx:AddChild>
<mx:AddChild position="lastChild">
<mx:Button x="360" y="434" label="Undock Control Bar"
click="appControlBar.dock = false"/>
</mx:AddChild>
<mx:AddChild position="lastChild">
<mx:Button x="366.5" y="464" label="Dock Control Bar"
click="appControlBar.dock = true"/>
</mx:AddChild>
<mx:AddChild relativeTo="{appControlBar}"
position="before">
<mx:TextArea x="229.5" y="403" width="396" height="23"
editable="false" fontSize="12" fontWeight="bold" textAlign="center"
id="textarea0">
<mx:text>Undocking the control bar at runtime fixes
the problem:</mx:text>
</mx:TextArea>
</mx:AddChild>
<mx:AddChild relativeTo="{appControlBar}"
position="before">
<mx:TextArea x="229.5" y="210" width="396" height="105"
editable="false" fontSize="12" fontWeight="bold" textAlign="center"
id="textarea2">
<mx:text>If you try and return to the base state while
the control bar is docked, the state change will fail. The state
change will get "stuck" and you'll have to reload
the Flex application. If there was a third state, you could change
to that to get out of the lockup, but you still can't transition to
any state that would remove the docked Application Control
Bar:</mx:text>
</mx:TextArea>
</mx:AddChild>
</mx:State>
</mx:states>
<mx:Button x="358.5" y="135" label="Goto Problem State"
click="currentState="problemState""/>
<mx:TextArea x="229.5" y="70" width="396" height="57"
editable="false" fontSize="12" fontWeight="bold" textAlign="center"
id="textarea1">
<mx:text>A Docked application control bar prevents
Flex from changing state to a state that would remove the
application control bar.</mx:text>
</mx:TextArea>
</mx:Application>

Hi Harry (and others),
I have seen similar behavior. It seems like the client side rendering for some reason has a hard time processing the collection model wrapping the ArrayList in this particular case. The table renders empty. After sorting in ascending order, the rows are all back (visible) again.
Is anyone aware of issues with the rich table based directly on ArrayList (in combination with a changing set of values and/or sorting)? (seems like a corner case but is still not uncommon). Is there any indication that wrapping the ArrayList in a CollectionModel ourselves might be required?
Harry: do you know whether this issue is introduced with PS3 (11.1.1.4) or already existed in previous releases?
kind regards,
Lucas

It policy application control

Hey, i need some help with removing my applications. Whenever i try to the error pops up and says: It policy application control. When i try to delete the module stuff it says that to. I personally have never ben involved in any company or IT network. Now LONG story short i kind of have a reycled-part blackberry (everything works perfectly except this!), so the IT policy part might of had connections to a IT network at sometime. I tried using the desktop manager to delete the apps, hell i even reset the OS (i did however backup/recover the phone.... could this be the problem?) In conclusion: How do i delete the It policy?
some info:
phone: 8310
Carrier: ATT
Os: 4.5
thanks in advance!
Solved!
Go to Solution.

hello, what you need to do is remove the IT policy from the previous life of your Blackberry device.
You have many tutorials on how to do that here :
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&btnG=Google+Search&q=blackberry%20policy.bin
good luck
The search box on top-right of this page is your true friend, and the public Knowledge Base too:

ISA 570W - Application control not functioning

All of a sudden the Application control has ceased to function. I have tried re-booting, resaving settings. I have checked the logs and there are no entries? Any ideas or help is appreciated.
Firmware: 1.2.20

Did you ever fix this problem? I'm having the EXACT same problem. Just updated to Lion from Snow Leopard.
I knew there would be some glitches, since I've had the same user folder since 10.0. Been updating all the way since then. Everyone always says it will break. It never does. I always figure out how to fix it.
Everyone always wants to nuke the site from orbit. Clean install. That sort of nonsense. Bah.
A real Mac user figures out how to fix the problem, and fixes it. Only idiots reinstall from scratch.

Approval Index in Application controlled WF

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for