Archiving via CO_COPC Archiving Object

Hello,
We would just like to know if anyone can help us out an on a problem we are encountering while working with the CO_COPC object when archiving cost estimates. Based on the documentation we found in http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/8d/3e5815462a11d189000000e8323d3a/content.htm:
"A standard cost estimate is used to set the standard price for valuating a material. To keep the data in your system consistent, standard cost estimates that are linked to the material master record (that is, marked and released standard cost estimates) are not archived. These standard cost estimates remain in the database. Released standard cost estimates can only be archived and deleted if they are no longer connected to the material master record."
However, in our case, we are still able to archive some cost estimates with materials linked to the material master record and there is the curious case of several cost estimates linked to 1 material that was not archived. Could anyone shed light on this matter? Are there any other rules that this particular archiving object follows when identifying what should be archived?

Hi Karen,
For the cost estimates linked to material master which are getting archived, can you check whether the deletion flag is set for the material.
Refer to SAP note 178942, it might help answer your question.
Thanks,
Naveen

Similar Messages

No archive information found for object type and document type

Hi All,
When i try to view the print preview for a perticular doc type, system is giving the error as "No archive information found for object type and document type"
Diagnosis
    No information was found about optical archiving. This may be due to
    either of the following reasons:
    1. No valid archiving parameters were passed
    2. Your system is not configured for optical archiving
System Response
    Processing is cancelled.
Procedure
    Specify valid archiving parameters or check whether your system is configured for optical archiving
Regds,
CB

Hello,
You are trying to Print & also archive by selecting the option Print & Archive.
You have to do archivelink configurations and then create document type and assign to the object type with content repository with archivelink table.
If you want to archive the spool or output then you have to use object type as DRAW. If you are archiving invoice document or letters or so on then you have to know the object type/Business object of the transaction.
Please note that for archivelink configuration, attachment will be either stored in archive server or in SAP database table based on business requirement.
Hope this will give you some understanding on archiving area.
-Thanks,
Ajay

BC_XMB archiving via SARA

Hi
I have a problem with BC_XMB archiving via SARA:
Pr 1: Archiving screen (program RSXMB_ARCHIVE_MESSAGES) requires a number range input (0 - 99)...no date-range.
Pr 2: Test-mode showed 25,536 XML messages in date-range 20090928 - 20100211 that could be archived.
Qestions:
1. If the screen is correct for BC_XMB archiving, then the number range in "Pr 1" must have been set via transaction SPRO. Where is this on SAP or which transaction to run?
2. "Schedule Archiving Job" via transaction SXMS_ADMI_ARCH does not run in test-mode. I have run it before, thus taking away recent messages. Which program to use in oder to archive & delete those messages still dating from 2006 in the SXMS tables (including SXMSPERROR)?
Kind Regards
Merriman

Dear Merriman,
I saw your thread which addresses the very same issue as reported in your OSS ticket.
Please note that we have investigated your system and we also have arranged next steps with Primary Support. We kindly ask you to stick to the recommendations given in that OSS ticket as the same will guide you through this issue.
However, I will provide a brief answer to your first question regarding "Pr 1" in this forum as the information might be of general interest: the number ranges are used internally for determining a proper startup configuration for archiving. This is done by standard PI archiving job SAP_BC_XMB_ARCHIVE<client>. This one is to be scheduled by transaction SXMS_ADMI_ARCH only. Please do not use any transaction other than that!
Regarding your second question please note that you are suffering from an artefact described in SAP Note 1101755. That note advises to contact SAP Support for an individual solution. The solution will be provided to you by an custom report as stated by my colleague from Primary Support in his last reply to you.
Best regards,
Harald Keimer
XI Development Support
SAP AG, Walldorf

BPM process archiving "Processing of archiving write command failed"

Can someone help me with the following problem. After archiving a BPM proces, I get the following messages (summary):
ERROR Processing of archiving write command failed
ERROR Job "d5e2a9d9ea8111e081260000124596b3" could not be run as user"E61006".
LOG -> Processing of archiving write command failed
[EXCEPTION] com.sap.glx.arch.xml.XmlArchException: Cannot create archivable items from object
Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: ...
Configuration
I've completed the following steps based on a blog item.
1. created an archive user with the corresponding roles
2. updated the destination DASdefault with the created user -> destination ping = OK
3. created an archive store BPM_ARCH based on unix root folder
4. created home path synchornization with home path /<sisid>/bpm_proc/ and archive store BPM_ARCH
5. start process archiving from manage processes view.
Process Archiving
Manage Process -> Select a process from the table -> Archive button -> Start archiving by using the default settings.
Archiving Monitor
The following log is created which describe that the write command failed.
Write phase log:
[2011.09.29 12:00:18 CEST] INFO Job bpm_proc_write (ID: d5e2a9d9ea8111e081260000124596b3, JMS ID: ID:124596B30000009D-000000000C08) started on Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:00:18:133 CEST by scheduler: 5e11a5e0df3111decc2d00237d240438
[2011.09.29 12:00:18 CEST] INFO Start execution of job named: bpm_proc_write
[2011.09.29 12:00:18 CEST] INFO Job status: RUNNING
[2011.09.29 12:00:18 CEST] ERROR Processing of archiving write command failed
[2011.09.29 12:00:18 CEST] INFO Start processing of archiving write command ...
Verify Indexes ...
Archive XML schema ...
Resident Policy for object selection is instanceIds = [9ca38cb2343511e0849600269e82721e] , timePeriod = 1317290418551 , inError = false ,
[2011.09.29 12:00:18 CEST] ERROR Job "d5e2a9d9ea8111e081260000124596b3" could not be run as user"E61006".
[2011.09.29 12:00:18 CEST] INFO Job bpm_proc_write (ID: d5e2a9d9ea8111e081260000124596b3, JMS ID: ID:124596B30000009D-000000000C08) ended on Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:00:18:984 CEST
Log viewer
The following message is created in the log viewer.
Processing of archiving write command failed
[EXCEPTION]
com.sap.glx.arch.xml.XmlArchException: Cannot create archivable items from object
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.execution.CentralExecutor$SingleThread.run(CentralExecutor.java:328)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: class com.sap.glx.arch.Archivable:sap.com/tcbpemarchear @[email protected]2@alive incompatible with interface com.sap.glx.util.id.UID:library:tcbpembaselib @[email protected]f@alive
at com.sap.glx.arch.him.xml.JaxbTaskExtension.createJaxbObjects(JaxbTaskExtension.java:69)
at com.sap.glx.arch.xml.JaxbSession.fillFromExtensions(JaxbSession.java:73)
at com.sap.glx.arch.pm.xml.ArchProcessExtension.fillHimObjects(ArchProcessExtension.java:113)
at com.sap.glx.arch.pm.xml.ArchProcessExtension.createArchObjectItem(ArchProcessExtension.java:60)
at com.sap.glx.arch.xml.JaxbSession.createArchObjectItems(JaxbSession.java:39)
at com.sap.glx.arch.xml.Marshaller.createItems(Marshaller.java:29)
... 61 more

Hi Martin,
I don't have a specific answer sorry, however I do recall seeing a number of OSS notes around BPM archiving whilst searching for a different issue last year - have you checked on there for anything relevant to your currnet version and SP level? There were quite a few notes if memory serves me well!
Regards,
Gareth.

Archive contract without archiving scheduling agreements

Hello Experts,
I would like to archive contracts with the object MM_EKKO but not the scheduling agreements (which are also archived with this object). In the write program, there is a check : a contract can be archived if its scheduling agreement has a deletion flag. But, here, scheduling agreements are never deleted.
Can I create a specific program which bypass this check ? or are there any consequences ?
Thank you for your answers !!!
Victoria

Hello Jurgen,
I do know that the selection screen has this kind of criteria. The preprocessing program works but not the archiving program... Indeed, you can select only the contract but when the archiving program runs, it checks if the scheduling agreement linked to the contract is already archived.
That's my problem !

OBIEE Dev VM Install Issue:Cannot open archive "ARCHIVE.zip" as archive

All,
I downloaded all eleven files for the OBIEE 11.1.1.6.2 BP1 - Sample Application (V207).
I checked the MD5 Sum of the first two files and the MD5 Sums match, however when I use 7zip to extract the files, I get an error that says: Cannot open archive "ARCHIVE.zip" as archive
Has anyone encountered this issue? I verified that the files are not read-only and that they are not "blocked" by Windows.
I am running 64-bit Windows 7 Home Edition on a Dell laptop.
I encountered this error on two separate archives with correct MD5 Sums.
Any help would be appreciated! Thanks!
Nathan

Hi,
I got the same problem. Have you found any solution for this? Thanks.

Cannot view workflow log via Services for Object Workflow Overview

We recently had an upgrade of R3/ECC and discovered a new issue. For some reason we can no longer view workflow log via Services for Object > Workflow Overview for Material Master (transaction MM03). We get the message "There are no workflows that have already worked with this object". However, we have confirmed via SWEL and other t-codes that the workflow and log do exist. This seems to be the only object we have this issue for after the upgrade.
Anyone know what issue is and how to fix?   Or at least path to config in SPRO for "generic object services" where we can see if anything changed via upgrade for this object?
Thanks,
Matt
Edited by: Matthew Huth on Apr 22, 2008 9:23 PM

Found the solution. See OSS note 553246. This has been tested and works for us.   -Matt
Note 553246
Summary
Symptom
In the material master, the system no longer displays the attachments for the material or workflow items in the Generic Object Services.
Other terms
MM01, MM02, MM03
Reason and Prerequisites
As of Release 4.6B, business object BUS1001006 is valid for the material master. Until you have implemented Note 452424, the Generic Object Services is still published for the old BUS1001 business object. After implementing the note, all attachments, relationships, notes and workflow items that are assigned to business object BUS1001 are no longer displayed.
Instead, all new attachments are assigned to business object BUS1001006. As a result, attachments cannot exist for both systems.
For workflow items, the assignment to the business object occurs in the respective tasks. It may be very time consuming to convert the business object, depending on whether an individual subtype (assigned to BUS1001) is created.
In other words, after you implement the note, the workflow items for business object BUS1001 can no longer be displayed in the material master.
Solution
With the following correction you can call the Generic Object Services for both business objects. When it is called, the system displays a dialog box in which you can choose the required business object, that is, BUS1001 ('Material') or BUS1001006 ('Standard material').
This correction is delivered as a modification supported by SAP only. This is because the additional option means that attachments can be maintained as required in either of the business objects and users may therefore require extra training.
However, the corrections enable you to display attachments and workflow items for both business objects without the need for a major conversion; this means that you do not get the impression that these have been lost.
Alternatively, as of Release 4.70 (or Basis 6.20) you can, without making a modification, implement method ADD_OBJECTS of BAdI GOS_MULT_PUBLISH for filter attribute WF_OVERVIEW ('Workflow overview'), SRELATIONS ('Relationships') and VIEW_ATTA ('Attachment list'). The implementation should be similar to the following:
METHOD if_ex_gos_mult_publish~add_objects .
DATA:
    ls_lporb TYPE sibflporb.
READ TABLE ct_lporb INTO ls_lporb INDEX 1.
if ls_lporb-typeid = 'BUS1001006'.
    ls_lporb-typeid = 'BUS1001'.
    append ls_lporb to ct_lporb.
endif.
endmethod.

Access via NULL reference object not possible

Hi friends,
I have created an wda application which uses the table popin to display data.
So that i have created a view with two of the fields as link to action UI element.
In the Events/Actions of the link to action element i implemented the following logic.
data wd_table_cell_editor type ref to cl_Wd_view_element.
data wd_table_column type ref to cl_wd_table_column.
data wd_popin type ref to cl_wd_table_popin.
data id type string.
 wd_table_cell_editor ?= wd_this->m_view->get_element( id ).
wd_table_column ?= wd_table_cell_editor->get__parent( ).
wd_popin = wd_table_column->get_popin( ).
context_element->set_attribute( name = 'SELECTED_POPIN' value =
wd_popin->id ).
So when i click on the link to action in the table column of the field am getting the following error
Access via NULL reference object not possible.
While debugging i have noticed that this error was coming at the below step of the code.
wd_table_cell_editor ?= wd_this->m_view->get_element( id )
in the m_view->get_element( id ) does not contan any value , its showing as table , as null value cannnot be assigned may be its throwing the above error.
But i didnt understand why the view is not getting UI element id ....
Can one please suggest me where might be the wrong....
Regards
Sireesha.

Hi nithya,
Could you please calrify the doubts for the following q's.
1. As u said in the above post, i have changed the code to the below.
 data: lr_table type ref to cl_wd_table,
lr_table_col type ref to cl_wd_table_column.
lr_table ?= wd_this->m_view->get_element( 'TABLE' ).
lr_table_col = lr_table->get_column( ID = 'TABLE_CONNECTID' ).
wd_popin = lr_table_col->get_popin( ).
(At the above step which is in bold , eventhough there is value in lr_table_col->get_popin , its not assigning a value to the wd_popin, throwing same error NULL etc.,)
context_element->set_attribute( name = 'SELECTED_POPIN' value =
wd_popin->id ).
2. Before changing the code suggested by u, the follwoing was the code from standard example.Its working fine in the application wdr_test_table.I have debugged the code.The value is getting assigned into wd_table_cell_editor.
The same thing i have done but its failing to assign the value. thats y its throwing null reference error. Here i have a confusion how its assigning a value and y not in the z application.am giving the code below which is in standard and my application.Please clarify these.
data wd_table_cell_editor type ref to cl_Wd_view_element.
data wd_table_column type ref to cl_wd_table_column.
data wd_popin type ref to cl_wd_table_popin.
wd_table_cell_editor ?= wd_this->m_view->get_element( id ).
( Note : wd_this->m_view->get_element contains value but not assigning it to the wd_table_cell_editor and same code in the standard behaving correctly like assigning the view value to the cell editor. Y this behavior, please advice me)
wd_table_column ?= wd_table_cell_editor->get__parent( ).
wd_popin = wd_table_column->get_popin( ).
context_element->set_attribute( name = 'SELECTED_POPIN' value = wd_popin->id )
Regards
Sireesha.

How to display document from external archive via archivelink?

Hi,
I would like to display in SAP (via ArchiveLink) scanned document which was stored in an external archive (FileNet). The archive system is connected to SAP via ArchiveLink. However the scanned document isn't stored in the archive system via SAP so I don't know the ARCHIV_DOC_ID. I only know OBJECT_ID as far as the metadata of document is considered.
I tried to use ARCHIVOBJECT_DISPLAY function module with object_id and arvchiv_id but I get the message no. OA512 (Parameter info was not transferred for command docId). I can only display scanned document entering the right value of ARCHIV_DOC_ID parameter. But actually I don't know the value of this parameter from the level of SAP system.
Could anybody give me some clue or hints?
Best regards,
Zacaria

Hi
Just as Fred written SAP needs to be linked to external archiving system by a Contenent Repository (transaction OAC0).
The menu for ArchivLink setting is in customazing:
Was it done that?
Max

Archive the material master : Object RL_LUBU

Hi Folks,
we are archiving the material.
Error : WM stock transfer (from/to material) exists
Diagnosis : Entries in Table LUBU (Posting Chaneg Document)
Solution : Use the archiving object RL_LUBU in SARA.
Queries :
1) This Object does not give material nos to choose. Entire table is selected. How to come over this ?
2) Can there be any possible reasons for this error ?
Your inputs would be really helpful.
Regards
Edited by: YATIN DHRUVA on May 17, 2011 10:14 PM

Hello,
Usually PCNs will created automatically by the system, when you do a stock category change.
First you try to process the PCN using LT05 , if it is giving any error , go to LU02 and enter you PCN number and change the status to Processesed(U). Before doing this make sure to check the IM & WM stocks and close the PCN.
Regards
Raghu

Add more tables to be archived to standard archive object

Hi,
Is it possible to add more tables to be archived?
I would like to add tables eg DFKKCOLLH_I_W to archive object FIMKKCOLL.
Cheers...

HI,
Yes . You can Add additional table to the standard object. But you have to update the standard write , delete program to include this table in the archival process. So that it is not advisable to update the standard object.
But you can create a custom object by including all the tables you want and take the custom versions of the write,delete programs and do the required changes in that version.
Hope this helps you.
Regards - Swarna.

Create Camera Archive via Card Reader - Possible?

If I connect my DSLR (5D II) to the Mac Pro via USB it is not recognised when I click the Import Icon as a source to create a Camera Archive.
If I stick the CF card in a Firewire reader it does not appear as an option except when using Import under File menu option, and that imports directly as an Event.

Jeaux wrote:
I can understand using FCPX to archive tape footage, but for card contents I don't see the point. Create an archive file on a drive and drag a copy of your card there...
Yes, you could do it manually (what I generally do for photos) but for consistency I'd like to make archives when I've taken video footage - I'm only a hobbyist but often carry both my Sony HC3 camcorder and 5D II DSLR - I'll have video from both and it would be quite clumsy to have an archive of the tape material but a 'manually created' folder of the DSLR stuff.
Not essential to have this, but would certainly be nice.

Difference between the archive and cache_archive in object tag

hello,
I am trying to find the difference between the archive and cache_archive for the object tag to use for applet.
I was going through this link which discusses the applet caching :
http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/plugin/developer_guide/applet_caching.html
Especially : A sticky applet is placed in a disk cache created and
controlled by Java Plug-in which the browser cannot overwrite.How do i find what is the disk cache on my machine, and how different it is from the normal cache.
Currently i am using the normal archive parameter in object tag, and when i go to the java plugin control panel, i see all the downloaded jars.
But wanted to know how will it be different from using the cache_archive parameter.
Please advise,
Edited by: duskandawn on Jun 10, 2009 11:07 AM

Hi Juraj!
I feel the same too - Except the fact that SessionFacade is used to access EJBs while the VO are built as response objects (i.e. assembled) and unassembled by different web requests.
rnats

Archivation of asset subnumber object AM_ASSET

Hi experts,
I want to archive few subnumbers of asset. For example I have asset P09.08.011 subnumber 0 which have subnumbers 1 - 21.
I want to archive asset subnumbers from 13 - 19. There is not amount in those subnumbers.
I searched web, and I found some guides e.g . Data archiving in FIAA
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/DataArchivinginFI-+AA
but when I tried to create write variant for archivation object AM_ASSET, I didn't found any possibility to enter asset subnumbers in archivation variant. I can only enter assets, but no subnumbers in test mode with archive file.
Is there possibility to archive only few asset subnumbers ?
Can I somehow copy archivation object AM_ASSET and somenow change this copy for my purpose?
Please help me ...
Thanks and regards,
Adrian

Hi Adrian,
Looks like you are right - info structure AM_ASSET does not support archiving by asset subnumber.
What you could do is a development to expand the info-structure to include sub-numbers. I am not an expert in that; you may want to post something in the archiving forum under application lifecycle management.
Good luck,
Tammy

Archiving of BAM database object.

Hello All,
I would like to do data management in BAM database object. Hence please answer the belwo questions.
Q1.How to transfer data from one BAM DO to another BAM DO? Can we developed a script which can do the same?
Q2.How to archive the BAM DO automatically?
Please help me out as soon as possible.
Thanks,
Ritesh Jain
Edited by: [email protected] on Aug 27, 2009 10:08 PM

Please explain the purpose behind data object archiving so that I can suggest proper solution.
Otherwise, the easiest solution for archiving dataobject and its contents is through icommand command line utility. See the documentation of icommand export to see how you can export data object definition and its contents to a file. As this is a command line utility, you can put this in your script/batch file to execute it periodically to take the back up of the dataobject contents.

Archiving via CO_COPC Archiving Object

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for