Are Intel Macs G5s?

No. Apple in 1997 began using central processing units (CPUs) by IBM and Motorola known as G3 to follow the original PowerPC processors 601 through 604e (never officially nicknamed G2), and the 68k processors (never officially nicknamed G1) by IBM and Motorola respectively. The G4 and G5 models were made by Motorola and IBM respectively and were improvements on the original G3 design. Finally in 2006, Apple started using CPUs manufactured by Intel in the Core Solo and CoreDuo processors, and this have now increased to faster Core2Duo and Xeon processors by Intel. While not officially called G6s, these Intel processors are not G5s, and while the iMac from 2006 through the mid 2007 release look like on the outside as if they are identical to the G5s that preceded them, they are not G5s except in form factor. Similarly the PowerMac G5s which look similar to the Mac Pros are very different models, in addition to the Mac Pros have an extra optical drive bay. And the Intel Mac Minis have 4 USB ports on the back where the G4 Mac Minis have only 2. Other models are more obvious whether they are Intel such as the MacBook Pro, and the MacBook and the new Aluminum clad iMacs with black rears and picture frames of the displays which are also Intel and not G5s. To tell apart iMacs externally without turning them on, use this article as a guide:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=301724
and find out the equivalent EMC# on the base of the iMac.

Nubz,
I forgot to maintain my subscription here as I was trying to keep my e-mail down. I do like your editing. Please feel free to publish it.

Similar Messages

  • Re: Are Intel Macs G5s?

    Hi a brody,
    I have been looking at this one for a bit. Good information, and good to clarify, but presented as one big block I find it hard to digest. May I suggest splitting it into smaller paragraphs, almost bulleted points? Something like this?:
    No.
    While the iMac from 2006 through the mid 2007 release look like on the outside as if they are identical to the G5s that preceded them, they are not G5s except in form factor.
    Similarly the PowerMac G5s, which look similar to the Mac Pros, are very different models. In addition to the processor change, Mac Pros have an extra optical drive bay.
    The Intel Mac Minis have 4 USB ports on the back where the G4 Mac Minis have only 2.
    Other models are more obvious whether they are Intel such as the MacBook Pro, and the MacBook and the new Aluminum clad iMacs with black rears and picture frames of the displays which are also Intel and not G5s.
    To tell apart iMacs externally without turning them on, use this article as a guide:
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=301724
    and find out the equivalent EMC# on the base of the iMac.
    A Brief Processor Architecture history:
    1984 Early Macs used the 68000 processor family made by Motorola, from the 68000 to the 68040.
    1994 Apple switched to PowerPC processors made by IBM and Motorola, (thus the term Power Mac). This started with the PowerPC 601 through 604e processors. Then the 3rd, 4th and 5th Generation PowerPC processors (G3, G4 and G5).
    2006 Apple started using CPUs manufactured by Intel with the Core Solo and CoreDuo processors. These have now increased to faster Core2Duo and Xeon processors by Intel. Since the Intel processors are totally different processors, not an evolution of the PowerPC architecture, they do not carry the G5 or G6 nomenclature.
    "for your consideration" Nubz

    Nubz,
    I forgot to maintain my subscription here as I was trying to keep my e-mail down. I do like your editing. Please feel free to publish it.

  • Intel Macs & G5s: Problems when moving projects between them

    An earlier post* suggesting complete compatibility between the latest FCP in a G5 and in an Intel Mac may be in error.
    We are experiencing continuing crashes using our Intel Mac when we work on projects that were originally either imported or partially rendered in the G5.
    It has gotten to the point where we feel we must keep projects completely isolated from each other: Either it is a "G5 project" or it is an "Intel Mac" project. Moving projects back and forth between the two leads to problems such as:
    The Intel Mac does not recognize any renders done in the G5...
    The Intel Mac crashes when rendering 'G5' projects...
    The Intel mac crashes when compressor goes to work to export sequences to mpeg...
    The G5 works fine with Intel Mac-originated material: It is only in the Intel Mac where we have these problems.
    Both systems are up-to-the minute on their OS, security updates, and FCP versions. We are using variously 720p/30 from the JVC GY-100UA and 1080i/30 from the Sony Z1U.
    Our questions are:
    Is anyone else experiencing similar problems moving projects between a G5 and an Intel Mac?
    Is anyone moving projects between the two platforms and experiencing NO problems at all? That information would be just as valuable, and very welcome.
    Apple FCP development team: Is our experience unique or have you had other reports like this? Any idea what could be causing our problems -- and what we can do to fix them?
    * http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=3604812&#3604812
    Intel MacPro Tower, 3gHz, 8mb   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   Also a G5 Tower, 2x2.5ghz, single core

    Scott,
    Welcome to the discussions!
    I have had no problems moving my G5 projects over to my MP.
    You can not move render files between machines.
    When you changed systems, did you use Migration Assistant to transfer your files over to your new Mac Pro? You might need to install from the disks in order to achieve native Intel performance. See if you installed Final Cut 5.1 on your G5 then it installed the PPC code... if you put that drive into your Mac Pro or used Migration Assistant to move the app over it is still the PPC code... When you install from the installation disk, Installer determines what system you are installing on (PPC or Intel) and that's what it installs. This goes for all of your "Universal Binary" apps...
    In the System Profiler app. under Software/Applications
    Final Cut Pro "kind" should be Universal on your MP.
    The FCP development team do not read these posts, only users do.

  • See Bonjour Printer on Intel Macs; see printer but can't set-up/print on G4

    I have an HP Laserjet connected to the usb port of my airport extreme. Using the Print & Fax preference set up and printing are fine on my Macbook Pro running 10.5.8 and on my iMac running 10.6.6. However when I use the same process on my iMac G4 (also running 10.5.8) when I go to add the printer it shows up as it does for the other computers (as HP Laser Jet 3030 Bonjour) but when I select it the wheel spins but the printer is never 'retrieved' - so I can't add it. Any clues - the only difference that I can see is that the two computers that work are Intel Macs but I see in the forums that people appear to be using bonjour printers with PPCs as well. Any suggestions are appreciated. Thanks.

    I should add the the AEBS is the older snow cone (b/g).

  • Incredibly slow FTP upload speeds on Intel Macs with OS 10.5

    I've been using FTP programs like Fetch and Vicomsoft FTP for years and recently bought two new Intel iMacs to add to my office. I still have my older G5 iMacs as well. We have an extremely high speed business class broadband connection and on the older iMacs that are running 10.4.11, our FTP connection through Fetch and Vicomsoft with them is absolutely super-fast with upload speeds of close to 300 kb/sec.
    However, on the new iMacs, which are Intel Macs and run OS 10.5, the FTP upload connection is insanely slow, with upload connections of less than 30 kb/sec (yes, 10 times slower). It starts out fast at first (like all FTP connections) but then very rapidly slows to a maddening crawl of 30 kb/sec or less.
    Anyone have any idea what this might be attributed to? Or anyone out there have the same problem? We are having to transfer everything to our older iMacs in order to upload, which is another huge time waste.
    Any help is appreciated.
    BTW, on the new Intel Macs, we have tried using both Fetch 4.0.3 (which is the version we have on the older iMacs) as well as Fetch 5.3 and the same slowness problem exists for both.

    Firefox 3.6.x is the last available from Mozilla for PPC Macs. <br />
    http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html
    For older Macs that aren't supported in Firefox 4+ versions, try TenFourFox for PowerPC's running Mac 10.4.11 & 10.5.8 . <br />
    http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox/<br />
    http://tenfourfox.blogspot.com/ <br />
    https://code.google.com/p/tenfourfox/wiki/PluginsNoLongerSupported

  • The Intel Mac Mini uses on-board graphics... how good are they?

    I'm seriously considering getting an Intel Mac Mini and telling all my friends to get one, too. However, there's one problem - the graphics.
    The whole reason I'd want an Intel Mac would be so that I could dual-boot into Windows Vista (when it comes out) in order to play the latest games.
    How suitable are the on-board graphics for gaming? Would it be able to play Halo and Command & Conquer Generals well?
    Basically, I want to know if it's the equivalent of a 64 MB graphics chip in speed, or if having on-board graphics makes it a bit slower. Does it have hardware acceleration? And is it suitable for smooth casual gaming at an average resolution?

    I am very uneasy about finding integrated graphics in the new mini too.
    When I first saw the new Mini website on Apple's website I was so excited "intel processor", "4 usb ports", "faster drives" but something was missing from the website; the "graphics" sub-category. I instantly wondering what was up with that, thinking right away obviously the graphics weren't good enough to brag about. I was right. On Apple's MacMini website, on the "Intel Core" sub-category page, bottom of the page, right side there's a weee comment on integrated graphics, "oh." was my only thought.
    It's really disappointing to see integrated graphics in the new Mini. That AND the increase in price. The price of the Intel iMac dropped by $100 when it got introduced, but the Intel Mini's price goes up $100 upon introduction, further closing the price between the iMac and the Mini and making the iMac looking more and more attractice in terms of features-performance-price-value. I better run out and buy a Intel iMac before Apple removes the miniDVI-out port (which I'm predicting it will be removed in the next iMac revision)
    Hopefully some Intel MacMini review tests in the coming weeks will reveal better-than-expected graphics performance.
    I'm surprised nobody else has mentioned this but... doesn't anyone here see that Apple has given us a preview of what's to come by putting integrated graphics in the new Intel MacMini? -- Anyone? I'll tell you -- we're going to see the exact same integrated graphics in the upcoming Intel iBooks, that's what.
    Mac Mini   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  

  • Are Intel based Macs more prone to Viruses than PPC based Macs?

    I do not now, nor have I ever run A-V software. Nor have I ever had an issue with any kind of viruses, malware, spyware etc. However, I read an article in our local newspaper recently that even Macs, particularly Intel based Macs, are vulnerable to viruses. So, as a newcomer to the world of Intel Macs, the question suddenly takes on new significance and urgency. I do plan to run Windows on my MBP (as soon as I get the computer and set it up), and will likely use an emulator like VirtualBox. I have run VPC on my Pismo for years, and viruses have never been an issue, albeit I used Windows only for short periods at a time. So, is this a legitimate concern? What specific measures do I need to take, if it is, indeed, a concern?
    cornelius
    Message was edited by: cornelius

    As TD states, your Windows installation running as a virtual machine is as vulnerable as any Windows PC. If you won't be accessing email, and limit your web browsing, you'll be somewhat safer - but, I'd definitely recommend running AV software even so. There is quite a bit of malware/spyware that will install itself upon visiting some websites, and it can be easier than you think to run into one of those sites (for example, accidentally leaving out a 'p' when typing apple.com into a browser address bar redirects you to another site - 2sale.com; that one seems innocuous, but that's not always the case).
    Note that VMware comes with a free 12-month subscription to McAfee VirusScan® Plus, so for the time being there's no need to purchase additional AV software, just make sure you keep McAfee running and up to date.
    On the up side, if your virtual machine does become infected, the problems will remain confined to the virtual machine. Should you need to, you can roll back to a previous snapshot, or, if you set it up as a virtual disk virtual machine (i.e. VWware is not accessing a Boot Camp partition, but rather the virtual machine is stored as a file in the Mac OS), then the virtual machine is backed up along with your other files as part of your routine backup strategy.

  • Are early Intel Macs dead as far as future Mac OsX's?

    Ok so I have a silly message. Will Mac leave us in the dust as far as OsX on older Intel Macs circa 2006?

    The 2006 models were the first and slowest Intel models.
    Plus, the fact that the max. RAM for these iMacs is only 3 GBs.
    Between the slow CPU and very limited RAM, I don't think the 2006 models are up to the challenge running Mt. Lion.
    3 GBs is barely enough to run OS X, by itself, nevermind trying to run any other applications atop OS X.
    I don't even think they are really up to running OS X 10.7 Lion!
    I was still on a PowerPC Mac up until 4 months, ago.
    PowerPC users end fate came in 2007 when OS X 10.5 Leopard was the last universal OS.
    Onxe the switch to INtel CPUs came, every PowerPC Mac user knew the clock was ticking down to the day when these Mac would no longer be supported.
    If late Mac upgraders bought the last of the G5 models produced in 2005, they only got 2-3 years of OS X updatea for OS X 10.5 before Apple pulled the plug on all support for PowerPC models.
    The older PowerPC Mac user based fared a lot better and had quite a few years of support for their aging Macs.
    Just because there is no longer any continued OS support doesn't mean your particular Mac still doesn't still do what you need or expect it to do. No one is forcing you to stay on the Mac hardware/software upgrade path.
    Apple also did this with the transition from old 68000 model CPU's to the Motorola PowerPC CPU line of Macs back in the 1990's.
    There is always going to be a time when Apple is going to discontinue Mac models.
    There is no reason to feel left out if the Mac you purchased is still working well and for you.
    I stayed with a 1.25 GHz PowerMac G4 tower with 2 GBs of RAM for almost 10 years. That Mac served me very well! For me, I had financial means and it was a decision to finally move on and move up to a more faster and modern Mac.
    I purchased a 3 year old 27 inch screen iMac with the hope I can get another 4-6 years from the iMac.

  • Intel Mac Mini fans run full blast even when off

    Hi All,
    I have gone through the forums and haven't found an answer to this one. I have an Intel Mac Mini running the latest updated Tiger that I use solely for a media center.
    About a week ago, the box started running fans full blast, regardless of whether it was actually turned on or not. As soon as it is plugged in the fans blast.
    Otherwise, it seems healthy, and boots normally.
    The steps I have taken so far include resetting permissions, verifying the disk, and resetting the SMC in the proscribed fashion.
    After this occurred, I downloaded and installed smcFanControl from Lifehacker.com. This reported fan speed of zero and Temperature of zero.
    Next I opened the case and insured the fan/HD cable next to the lttle battery was securely fastened as this had been reported to cause this symptom.
    What's next? The device is out of warranty and honestly, I don't want to spend any money if I can help it.
    Should I take it apart further and see if the other end of the fan/HD cable has somehow worked loose?
    Can anyone think of another cause besides a loose cable?
    What if I completely disabled the fan? The hardest thing I ever ask it to do is run iTunes and VLC.
    Any advice is greatly appreciated.
    Dave

    I have refurbished two G5s with LCS and screaming fans (this was avery common problem with G5 LCS macs), the red light on the motherboard could mean the CPUs need to be re-seated. This red LED light appeared on my mac after I had removed the CPUs to add new thermal paste.
    If you have done all the necessary basics with no sucess here are a few things to try next.
    1 - Coolant
    As BDAqua mentioned above, coolant evaporates and often leaks at the 'O' rings, to check this you will need to remove the CPUs from the LCS and check for crystalisation (white rice). If you have leakage, it will be time to drain the block, add new coolant and 'O' rings. This is tricky to do but there is lots of info here and on other sites to help you.
    2 - Thermal paste
    Replace the thermal paste with Artic MX4.
    Try the above and let is know how ou get on.

  • How can I get lion on my intel mac

    How do I get a copy of Lion for my intel power mac?

    No PowerMac has Intel CPU on it.   If it is a G5 it is a CPU made by IBM, not Intel.  If it is G4, it is made by Motorola, and G3 is made by IBM.     10.7 will not run on any PowerMac.    Neither will 10.6.  Apple's transition to Intel was even more confusing for various Intel models:
    1. iMac, read the EMC# on the bottom of the foot of the iMac.  If it is it is white plastic with a right side of LCD loading optical drive, they will have an EMC# on the base which is enumerated 2104, 2105, 2110, 2114, 2118, 2111, 2133, or 2134 if they are Intel.  Otherwise they are PowerMac G5 if everything else is the same.
    2. Mac Mini, will have at minimum 4 USB ports on the rear if they are Intel.  Otherwise they are PowerMac.
    3. Mac Pro (Intel) has a cheesegrater case with two optical drive bays (not necessarily both being filled with a drive).  PowerMac G5s only have one bay.
    4. MacBook labelled below the screen is Intel.  Powerbook and iBook are PowerMac.
    5. eMac is PowerMac only.

  • Compressor network rendering from Intel Mac to PowerPC Macs

    Has anyone had any experience utilizing a Power PC G5 render farm for Compressor? I have the option of setting up a render farm utilizing up to 15 PowerPC G5s from an Intel Mac. Due to system limitations the Intel Mac will be running FCP 7 with Compressor 3.5 while the G5s are to be running FCP 6 with Compressor 3.0.
    These 15 G5s are going to be sent to surplus if I don't take advantage. But I don't want to have 15 computers sitting around that won't render.
    Any suggestions or experiences with such a situation?

    I've had some experience using both Intels and PowerPCs in a QCluster. The hardware doesn't matter much, as long as all of the software is the same. Since you're using 2 different versions of Compressor and QMaster in this particular cluster, you will have compatibility problems. Also, depending on how you're connecting these machines, distributed encoding may not be a good solution.
    A couple of weeks ago, I was testing a similar setup for a work group here. They had some extra iMacs that they wanted to network together to encode some Image Sequences. I ran some tests, and found that encoding without a cluster and with just a local cluster inside of just one MacPro was twice as fast as adding other nodes via ethernet.
    But the basic answer to your question is that all service and controller nodes must have matching software versions. This is explained in greater detail in .

  • Intel Mac Mini stuck in reboot loop

    I just upgraded the hard drive in my 2007 intel mac mini core duo. Drive formatted successfully, contains GUID Partition Table.
    OSX 10.5 installed successfully.
    Machine rebooted, I ran software update to 10.5.7 successfully.
    Upon installing Adobe Flash Player, Adobe Acrobat Reader, machine began to react slowly to commands.
    Rebooted machine, went to Grey Apple Screen with spinning dash wheen icon.
    Machine rebooted itself, once again going to the grey apply screen with the spinning wheel.
    After about 15 minutes of letting the continual reboot cycle happen, I inserted the installation DVD for 10.5, held the power button in to power off the machine, and booted from the disk.
    I ran disk utility. Disk Utility shows the hard drive, shows the partition (GUID Partition) correctly.
    I Verified Disk, which verified as "OK"
    Repaired permissions.
    Restarted machine.
    Once again, it loaded to the grey apple screen, stayed there with the spinning dash wheel for about 3 minutes then continued to reboot over and over (everytime it reboots it sticks on the grey apple screen for 3 minutes before rebooting.
    I once again powered off the machine and reset the PRAM.
    Machine stuck again on reboot cycle.
    I powered off the machine and reset the mini's SMC.
    Machine is still stuck in reboot cycle.
    I have also taken the mini back apart and verified that all RAM and connections are seated properly.
    Any advice on what to do at this point will be very helpful.

    +And I promise I will not download and install a hundred different programs this time.+
    Good idea.
    Any time you install software in OSX, there is a small, but finite, chance that the installation process won't be able to access a needed file because it is in use. This can mess up pre-binding, or even prevent files from being updated.
    So the best advice is not to run any other programs while doing software installs or updates. And when in doubt, run DiskUtility afterwards and fix permissions one more time.
    I cringe whenever I think of a post I read a while back about a Mac user who boasted about what music he likes to run in iTunes while doing system software updates. Not a good idea. It's "Russian roulette" with maybe 99 blanks in the "gun", but one real bullet that can kill your Mac's installation.

  • Installation problems on Intel Mac. claims PPC

    I'm trying to install the current Flash Player 10.2 on my Macbook 6,1 (Intel Core 2 Duo, 2.26GHz) with 4GB RAM, running OSX 10.6.6
    Browser is Firefox 3.6.13 {Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13}
    I got the installer from http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
    The installer puts up a message: "Devices with PowerPC processors are no longer supported"
    How can I convince the installer that this isn't a PPC machine ?  Why might the installer think so ?

    Hi, What browser are you using to try to Uninstall/Install FP vs 10.2? And when you Install 10.1, what browser are you using?
    There is no Flash Player support for a 64bit browser. I have been very busy on the Forum and have not had time to check on the 10.3 beta. Not sure what it refers to. Have you? Just asking as I've seen it mentioned on another thread, but it's from those complaining about 10.2 not working. Why anyone would want a beta Installed unless they are involved in the testing and are Developers I don't know.
    Any beta is a work in progress, so as long as a user is aware of that it's ok with me. Microsoft has their IE9 in beta too, but with an beta one can expect problems.
    Since the 10.2 is not Installing, then I don't think you'd receive any code, do you?
    I'm not as familiar with the Mac, but is it possible to upgrade the OS from a PPC to the edition you have now?
    I'm going to check a couple of things while you let me know on the above browser info. Also any comments would be welcome:-)
    Thanks,
    eidnolb

  • I have OSX 10.5.7 on my Intel Mac. When I try to login using the correct password the screen goes white and just returns back to the login screen. It does not jiggle like when you enter the wrong password.

    I have had a number of issues with my Intel Mac recently and had to reboot using disk utilities, safe mode, OSX recovery, but always come back to the login screen but when I type my password the screen goes white and returns to the login screen. My password is correct and the login does not jiggle as it would if the password was wrong. Please advise,

    Back up all data if you haven’t already done so. There are ways to back up, even if you can’t log in. Before proceeding,you must be sure you can restore everything to the state it’s in now. If you’re not sure you can do that, STOP.
    The procedure below may spare you the need for a clean reinstallation of OS X. If you don't feel comfortable carrying it out, don't. try.
    Briefly, you need to delete the following file:
    /var/audit/current
    If you already know how to do that, you can skip the rest of this message. Do it, and try again to log in.
    Boot in single-user mode by holding down the key combination command-S at the startup chime. If you’re using an external USB keyboard, it must be plugged directly into a built-in port on the Mac, not into a hub. Release the keys when you see a black screen with scrolling white text. In this mode, there’s no graphical interface; just a command line. Initially, you can’t make any changes to files.
    When the text stops scrolling, and you see a line ending in a pound sign (“#”), type the following command:
    mount -uw /
    You must type the command exactly as given, with no mistakes. If you don’t feel able to do that, STOP. At this stage, no harm will be done if you make a mistake, but later, it will be. Press the return key.
    Next, type the following command:
    rm -i /var/audit/current
    Press return. You should get the following output:
    remove /var/audit/current?
    If that's not what you get, STOP. Type the single letter N, press return, and try again. Otherwise, type the single letter Y and pressreturn.
    Finally, enter the command:
    exit
    Press return. The text will start scrolling again, and then the system will reboot. Try again to log in.
    Credit for this solution to ASC user AnthonyTW.

  • Can I use OS9 as the start up disk on my Intel Mac?

    I have a new Intel iMac. I want to partition my hard drive, install OS9 and run the old system. I know I can't use "classic" on 10.4.7 but I wonder if I could simply install OS9 and reboot my computer. I don't need to move between the two, meaning I don't need to work in OS9 then instantly click and be in 10.4.7. I can deal with the inconvenience of rebooting.
    I'm having 3 problems
    #1, I have an old version of Photoshop. I'll buy the newest Photoshop someday but the latest version wasn't made for Intel Macs and it is very expensive. $600. I wonder if it runs slow on Intel Macs. Maybe I should wait for the next version.
    #2 I have a great Epson printer (875 DC) but Epson has not updated the print drivers for this model and probably won't. OK fine I can buy a newer better photo printer $550.
    #3 I have a "Nikon Coolscan 4000" film Scanner $1,300. This scanner is great in OS9 but the thing never worked in OS10 and now that I have this Intel iMac I downloaded the latest software update and the thing still doesn’t work and if the computer sleeps while the Nikon software is open it won't wake up and I have to restart.
    To sum everything up, can I run OS9 on my Intel iMac? I don't care if I have to work in OS9 then shut down and restart to work in 10.4.7 Can this Intel iMac understand OS9. If I try to restart using OS9 as the startup disk will I damage the computer? Will I screw things up and have to spend hours and days removing files and correcting problems?
    I feel like this computer is a fresh clean new baby and I'm afraid that if I start messing around with it I'll regret it.

    Hello,
    I have a new Intel iMac. I want to partition my hard
    drive, install OS9 and run the old system. I know I
    can't use "classic" on 10.4.7 but I wonder if I could
    simply install OS9 and reboot my computer.
    The problem here, is that the OS 9 environment / Operating System will only run on a PowerPC processor.
    The only reason that OS X will run on either processor, is that it was specifically designed to do so from the beginning.
    But, OS 9 and older were specifically written for the PowerPC / Motorola processors.
    So, you will need a machine with a PowerPC processor to run OS 9.
    Currently, there is one program that will enable OS 9 to run on an Intel Mac. But, it requires making a copy of the Power Macintosh ROM. So, it's legal use is questionable at best.
    http://www.gibix.net/projects/sheepshaver/
    This program works by emulating the PowerPC processor. And, it is reported to operate at roughly 1/8-th of native speeds. So, it could be pretty slow for productive photo work.
    #1, I have an old version of Photoshop. I'll buy the
    newest Photoshop someday but the latest version
    wasn't made for Intel Macs and it is very expensive.
    $600. I wonder if it runs slow on Intel Macs. Maybe I
    should wait for the next version.
    If it is a Mac OS X version, then it will run on the Intel systems. But, yes it will be slower. Usable, but slower.
    I haven't tried this program, so I cannot personally comment on it. But, even Steve Jobs admitted it was slow on the Intel Macs.
    #2 I have a great Epson printer (875 DC) but Epson
    has not updated the print drivers for this model and
    probably won't. OK fine I can buy a newer better
    photo printer $550.
    OS X comes with drivers for the Epson Stylus Photo 875. They are provided by the Gimp-Print layer. But, installed / select just like any other printer. So, as long as you can connect the printer using USB, then you can select the driver for the 875 and be fine (as long as this is the same printer).
    Otherwise, some people have reportedly installed PowerPC print drivers without trouble. I haven't tried it myself.
    #3 I have a "Nikon Coolscan 4000" film Scanner
    $1,300. This scanner is great in OS9 but the thing
    never worked in OS10 and now that I have this Intel
    iMac I downloaded the latest software update and the
    thing still doesn’t work and if the computer sleeps
    while the Nikon software is open it won't wake up and
    I have to restart.
    Can't really help you there.
    To sum everything up, can I run OS9 on my Intel iMac?
    I don't care if I have to work in OS9 then shut down
    and restart to work in 10.4.7 Can this Intel iMac
    understand OS9. If I try to restart using OS9 as the
    startup disk will I damage the computer? Will I screw
    things up and have to spend hours and days removing
    files and correcting problems?
    As mentioned above, the only method currently available to use OS 9 on an Intel system is that SheepShaver program.
    But, I would not expect good results with it for your uses. And, it's legal status would be questionable since you need to copy a ROM file from another Mac to use it (which goes against Apple's license agreement).
    I feel like this computer is a fresh clean new baby
    and I'm afraid that if I start messing around with it
    I'll regret it.
    Just make sure you have a good backup of everything before you start experimenting.
    I hope this helps.

Maybe you are looking for

  • The Database Link is not active

    try to be more clear, i'm in lack of ideas in this problem. I am following guide Oracle Database 2 Day + Data Replication and Integration Guide. I defined global_names parameter of remote database as true.In the step of "creation database link" i am

  • TS3899 Mail Support

    After I read my mail, the red number indicating how many new emails I have won't go away. How can I get that to go away?

  • After effects rendering resolution

    I am using the warp stabilizer to stabilize some aerial footage, the footage is shot in high definition. However, when I render the footage I lose a lot of the resolution (Quality) within the video and it looks horrible.  I really need this footage t

  • Planned delivery cost not updating Through Invoic02 idoc

    Hi, We are using Inbound IDOC (INVOIC02) to create invoice. The enhancement that we are looking to do is to use the indicator Goods/Service items + planned delivery costs which is seen when we manually post invoices using MIRO. Can you please let us

  • Getting xml document out from clob

    Hi All, How could we get the xml document according to the user queries if we store the xml document as it is to the clob. Can I use the XSU to store the xml document to the clob and retrieve xml from the clob according to user queries.Is it possible