Artist sort order problem

Hi.
I have music sync'd via iTunes Match from my laptop to my iPad and to my iPhone. The names and order appear correct on both the laptop and on the iPad but on the iPhone several artists are either shown in all lower case or the last name will be used by the sort, rather than the first.
I've reset the artist, album artist and sort artist tags to different names (and they show up correctly then on the iPhone) and then set them back, but the problem remains.
I'm thinking that the iPhone has a corrupt file somewhere - but how can I reset that without losing everything on the phone?
A factory reset and restore from iCloud results in the same problem.
Any ideas?
Thanks guys.
--Cynan.

I also have an Artist sort order problem. While the circumstances are quite different from yours, I wonder if it's due to a similar corruption problem. I don't use iTunes Match. I found Kenny G listed under letter T.

Similar Messages

  • IPhone 4S artist sort order problem

    Running iTunes 10.5 and iOS5 on iPhone 4S and having this problem where when i go to Music and then the Artists tab, the artists are not listed under the proper letter.  So like when I click on the "V" on the side where all the letters are, it goes to V, but all the bands listed under that start with S.  then when I get down to "Z" all the bands start with T, and that it.  So I cant get to any of the artists that start with letters past T.  The songs are on the iPhone, when I search for them they show up and I can play them and they are still on their proper playlists.  But still pretty annoying for when i just want to hear a specific artist.  Any ideas?

    quote
    "I do have 5.0.1 - new iPhone 4 S and still have this problem. Artists are mixed up and not in a correct order. There must be a bug not fixed."
    me too

  • Album Artist sort order

    When I sort by Album Artist, it sorts, but the next level of sorting seems to be the artist then I'm not sure what it sorts by? I prefer the tree to go Album Artist>Album>Track number, is there any way to modify this?

    In the iTunes the Album by Artist view ordering is:-
    <Sort Album Artist OR Album Aritst OR Sort Artist OR Artist>, <Album>, <Disc No.>, <Track No.>
    On the iPod, Cover Flow ordering is:-
    <Sort Artist OR Artist>, <Album>, <Disc No.>, <Track No.>
    Where the OR uses the first non-blank value. In iTunes you can use Sort Artist to make a number of different artist values sort as one & display as one entry in the browser list. On the iPod this will group an album as one unit for the Album & Cover Flow view, however the Artist menu may still display the individual values put in the Artist field often listed thus:-
    Artist
    Artist/Guest 1
    Artist
    Artist/Guest 2
    Artist/Guest 3
    Artist
    etc.
    I use the Sort Artist field myself, in preference to putting all guest artist info. into the track title, but it's worth noting the side effects of doing so. Hopefully at some point the iPod sorting rules will be changed to match that of iTunes.
    tt2

  • Artist sort order and TSOP tags

    Can someone please help me understand how tagging and sort orders behave on an iPhone in advance of my buying one.
    I like to browse my music library by artist and, for example, I prefer to have "David Bowie" sort under "B" rather than "D". I believe that the spec for ID3v2.4 tags added the TSOP (Text Sort Order Performer) to over-ride the sorting order. Does the software on the iPhone take notice of the TSOP (or any alternative) tags when browsing by artist so that I can sort in the way I want?
    - Julian

    Sort order can either be set in iTunes or, if tagging using other programs before importing into iTunes, then the correct tags names to add are "Sort Artist" and "Sort Album" which will then be recognised by iTunes.

  • Month Sort Order Problem in Time Dimension(Essbase with Obiee)?

    Hi All,
    I am facing issue with month order in answers.
    First I created BSO cube using Essbase Studio. When i exposed cube in answers, months were sorted in alphabetical order. So i used RANK function with evaluate to arrange month members in proper order. But if i use RANK function it pulls all missing records and it is effecting performance.
    Then i created Time dimension(dimension loading) in essbase from FLAT file,initially it was coming in proper order. But after some time again it sorted in alphabetical order!!!
    I have seen in internate few people saying they didn't face this problem. I
    Please advice...
    Essbase: 11.1.1.3
    OBIEE: 10.1.3.4.1
    RS

    Hi user10300020,
    That's a fairly common problem with months that happens regardless of database source.
    In the logical layer of OBIEE you can specify the sort order on the month name column. Just double click on the month name column and look for the option to set sort order based on a different column. I typically sort the month name based on the month number.
    Give that a shot and tell me if it works.
    -Joe

  • "Date Added" sort order problem when importing folders

    I sort by "Date Added" to view my iTunes library, and use the middle "view" button to view tracks grouped as albums with artwork. This works mighty well except when I'm importing folders containing the files in an album, such as those I get from eMusic--the tracks are displayed out of order when I do this. The only solution I've found so far is to import one track at a time. Any ideas how I can get those tracks in there in the right order when importing a folder? Any scripts hanging around that will do it right? Thanks to all....

    What sort order do you have selecting in the sort drop-down?  There is no "correct" sort order.  You can sort on any metadata you can show in the Browser.  The sort drop-down is located in the top border of the Browser, near the left corner.  Every container in Aperture retains the sort order it last had.  When you manually move an Image in the Browser, the sort order is changed to "Manual".

  • ATV 4.4.2 photo sort order problem

    I have just updated my Apple TV (I believe it is now 4.4.2)
    When I view my photo albums, the sort order is not the same as that in my iPhoto.
    It was before the update.
    I resorted the albums again in iPhoto, they look just right on my MBP.  They also look exactly the way I wanted it on my iPad2 and my iPod.  But on Apple TV, it's all wrong again.
    I have invited friends over this weekend for a presentation that I want to show them slides on the Apple TV.  I am dead meat now.  Please advise.
    Thank you in advance.
    Eddie

    I did some additional testing using my Apple TV (1st generation) and my Windows 7 computer, and this is what I found.
    (This likely applies to iPad/iPod/iPhone too).
    Apple TV displays photos in order of their "Date Created" file attribute.
    If the "Date Created" file attribute of all photos in an album is identical, then Apple TV displays the photos in alphabetical order.
    This I what I do to make sure that Apple TV displays photos in the order I want them to be in:
    First, I arrange photos in the order I want them to be in. For this, I use Google Picasa, but one could also use FastStone Image Viewer, or any similar tool.
    Then, I bulk rename all the photos, so that their file names are in alphabetical order. I do this from within Picasa, but there are many other freeware file rename tools one could use for this.
    Next, I bulk change the "Date Created" file attribute of the photo files, so that they all have an identical one. For this, I use BatchTouch, freeware available for Windows and Mac.
    Finally, I open iTunes, and sync the photos to my Apple TV.
    Note: if they photos were already synced to your Apple TV before you perform the steps above, you may need to this beforehand:
    Open iTunes on your PC, and make sure that the correct photo folder is selected for syncing to your device.
    Using Windows Explorer, navigate to this folder.
    Within it, locate a subfolder called “iPod Photo Cache” ("iPad Photo Cache for iPad syncing) and delete it.

  • Sort Order problem in a cursor

    Hi,
    I have a cursor where the sort order needs to be specified dynamic. I have declared variables (say x and y) which contains the numbers. When I use them in the order by clause, though no compilation error, but the sorting does not occur.
    Eg. Cursor C1 is
    Select col1,col2
    from tab1
    where ...
    ORDER BY x (the value of x is 2).
    Your help is greatly appreciated. (This cursor is in Oracle Forms)
    Thanks

    How come this works:
    select samp1,samp2
    from   (select 'abc' samp1, 123 samp2 from dual union all
            select 'mno' samp1, 456 samp2 from dual union all
            select 'def' samp1, 3 samp2 from dual union all
            select 'pqr' samp1, 12 samp2 from dual union all
            select 'jkl' samp1, 64 samp2 from dual union all
            select 'stu' samp1, 10 samp2 from dual union all
            select 'vwx' samp1, 88 samp2 from dual union all
            select 'ghi' samp1, 7 samp2 from dual union all
            select 'yzz' samp1, 1 samp2 from dual
            ) testdata
    order by &x
    Enter value for x: 2
    old  12: order by &x
    new  12: order by 2
    SAM      SAMP2
    yzz          1
    def          3
    ghi          7
    stu         10
    pqr         12
    jkl         64
    vwx         88
    abc        123
    mno        456
    9 rows selected.
    select samp1,samp2
    from   (select 'abc' samp1, 123 samp2 from dual union all
            select 'mno' samp1, 456 samp2 from dual union all
            select 'def' samp1, 3 samp2 from dual union all
            select 'pqr' samp1, 12 samp2 from dual union all
            select 'jkl' samp1, 64 samp2 from dual union all
            select 'stu' samp1, 10 samp2 from dual union all
            select 'vwx' samp1, 88 samp2 from dual union all
            select 'ghi' samp1, 7 samp2 from dual union all
            select 'yzz' samp1, 1 samp2 from dual
            ) testdata
    order by &x
    Enter value for x: 1
    old  12: order by &x
    new  12: order by 1
    SAM      SAMP2
    abc        123
    def          3
    ghi          7
    jkl         64
    mno        456
    pqr         12
    stu         10
    vwx         88
    yzz          1
    9 rows selected.Isn't this what is wanted?
    -Marilyn

  • Sort order problem in reports

    Dear members,
    I have report with a field name sort_order but it don't show data in asending order, but first sort another column item_name in asending order.
    the sort_order is number
    item_name is char
    order by property of number is asending and item_name is none.
    both in same group.
    where I am wrong?
    Regards:

    hi O.Developer,
    here is my query:
    select MILL_ORDER, mill
    from tran_master
    group by MILL_ORDER, mills
    order by Mill_order, mills
    Mill Sort Order
    MILL1 1
    MILL2 2
    MILL3 3
    MILL4 6
    MILL5 7
    MILL6 8
    MILL7 10
    KP1 11
    MILL9 12
    DBL 13
    FAT 14
    BUT the above query gives the following out put:
    Mill Sort Order
    MILL1 1
    MILL2 2
    MILL3 3
    MILL4 6
    MILL5 7
    MILL6 8
    MILL7 10
    MILL9 12
    DBL 13
    FAT 14
    KP1 11
    regards:

  • Request/Service Offering Sort Order Problems

    I am having a difficult time finding a way to sort the results of a MP Enumeration List prompt type.  The sort order on the portal user prompt is random even though I have arranged them in teh Service Manager console list to be alphabetical.  This
    does not apply to the prompt the end user sees in the portal.   It is not alphabetical.  Anyone have any ideas? 
    The MP Enumeration prompt is mapped to the Service Request Source list.   Version is 2012 R2 with update rollup 2 installed on all SCSM servers.

    I'm experiencing the same issue, have you found a solution to this?

  • Sort order problem

    I have a minor, albeit annoying, problem that I can't seem to solve. I have one recently taken photo in my Aperture library which for whatever reason seems to have a preview that is dated as the oldest photo in my library. It displays in the correct order in all albums within Aperture, but in all other areas where the preview appears (Photo Browser in Mail, iLife, iPhone, Apple TV) it always shows up as the first or oldest item in any album in which it appears. The creation date on it is correct, I've tried rebuilding by database, regenerating Previews, deleting and reimporting the original RAW file etc...
    Is there a way to rebuild the database of the Image Browser within OSX? That's the next thing I'd like to try. Any suggestions?

    Hi Eric,
    My understanding of previews and master files is a bit patchy, but I thought I'd ask: Is the preview showing up in other apps as newest because it's the files you've made changes to last of all? If you import new files and make changes to them, does this change the order in which your problem file appears? I'm just thinking that maybe other apps are sorting previews by the Last Modified date, and if you're making changes to this file (Levels, saturation, cropping etc), then the preview will quite correctly show as the newest.
    Andrew

  • IPhoto sort order problem

    After install of 4.2 IPhoto only syncs in date order on Ipad. Will not sort in alphabetic order despite trying numerous times.

    I found a solution for the events remaining in the same order as in iphoto 9.1.1. After leaving the events in the order you want in iPhoto, edited the date and time information (exif file) of the first picture of each event. For example, I have ordered several events manually in iPhoto. I got in first and put the first photo of the first event to date 01/01/1958 12:00:00 by Pictures menu> Adjust Date and Time. In the second event to repeat the same process, and changed the date for the first photo to 01/01/1959 12:00:00. And so adding one year to each event to the last. After this change, re-syncronize all events with iphone4 and events were in the same order that had set in iphoto 9.1.1. This is because the iphone4 with IOS 4.2.1 uses the information contained in the EXIF photo files and sort by this information. I hope helped with this tip, which worked for me. When I add a new event, I have to sync your entire library again.

  • Sort order problems

    Why when i use the sort artist field on an artist that has featuring artist it sorts in the column browser with the featured artist, for example
    Artist : Audio Bullys Ft. Nancy Sinatra
    Album Artist : Audio Bullys
    Track : Shot You Down
    Sort Artist : Audio Bullys
    Sort Album Artist : Audio Bullys
    If I'm Sorting using those parameters, should it not show just Audio Bully's in my Column Browser. I have many artists with featuring artists, some of them sort how I want them to with just the main artist in the column browser, some don't.....any ideas on this?????
    Cheers Nick

    I'm experiencing the same issue, have you found a solution to this?

  • Sort Order problem in Oracle 11g

    Hi,
    While executing the below query in 10g and 11g, I got different results.
    SELECT loan.Ins_Id,
    ARev.revision,
    ADet.Acc_Id,
    loan.Loan_Id
    FROM
    Account_Det ADet
    join Acc_REV ARev
    on ADet.Acc_Id = ARev.Acc_Id
    join LoanAcc loan
    on loan.Loan_Id = ARev.Loan_Id
    join Interest_Det Ins
    on Ins.Ins_Id = loan.Ins_Id
    where Ins.Ins_Id in ('691','707')
    and ARev.revision=
    (select max(revision) from Acc_REV where Loan_Id =
    (select max(Loan_Id) from LoanAcc where Ins_Id =Ins.Ins_Id
    ) AND ADet.Acc_Id = '312'
    ORDER BY TO_NUMBER(ARev.revision) ASC;
    Result in Oracle 11g
    INS_ID  REVISION  Acc_ID   Loan_Id
    707      2      312    238
    691      1      312    234
    Result in Oracle 10g
    INS_ID  REVISION  Acc_ID   Loan_Id
    691      1      312    234
    707      2      312    238
    The order in both the cases were different.The order in 11g was not in ascending order.Though the data in both the databases
    is same. Could anyone please tell me why is this happening?. Is there any diffeence in the architecure of ORDER BY (sort) in
    10g and 11g. If I modify the above query by avoiding the subquery I get the correct result(i.e in ascending order).
    SELECT loan.Ins_Id,
    ADet.Acc_Id,
    loan.Loan_Id
    FROM
    Account_Det ADet
    join Acc_REV ARev
    on ADet.Acc_Id = ARev.Acc_Id
    join LoanAcc loan
    on loan.Loan_Id = ARev.Loan_Id
    join Interest_Det Ins
    on Ins.Ins_Id = loan.Ins_Id
    where Ins.Ins_Id in ('691','707')
    and ARev.revision in ('100','101')
    AND ADet.Acc_Id = '312'
    ORDER BY TO_NUMBER(ARev.revision) ASC;
    Edited by: KZON on Apr 7, 2011 4:46 AM

    Hi all,
    I have modified the query by giving To_Number(ARev.revision) before sub query. Now Oracle 11g returns results in ascending order. But 10g returns results in ascending order with out using To_Number()
    NOte:- Type of ARev.revision is VARCHAR
    SELECT loan.Ins_Id,
    ARev.revision,
    ADet.Acc_Id,
    loan.Loan_Id
    FROM
    Account_Det ADet
    join Acc_REV ARev
    on ADet.Acc_Id = ARev.Acc_Id
    join LoanAcc loan
    on loan.Loan_Id = ARev.Loan_Id
    join Interest_Det Ins
    on Ins.Ins_Id = loan.Ins_Id
    where Ins.Ins_Id in ('691','707')
    and To_Number(ARev.revision)=
    (select max(revision) from Acc_REV where Loan_Id =
    (select max(Loan_Id) from LoanAcc where Ins_Id =Ins.Ins_Id
    ) AND ADet.Acc_Id = '312'
    ORDER BY TO_NUMBER(ARev.revision) ASC;
    Result
    INS_ID  REVISION  Acc_ID   Loan_Id
    691      1      312    234
    707      2      312    238
    Is there any difference in ORDER BY clause in Oracle11g and 10g ?
    Edited by: KZON on Apr 7, 2011 4:45 AM

  • Itunes 11 Book author and Album artist sort problems

    (I've changed the name here, to protect the innocent and avoid comments about my taste. I shall call him 'Fred Anydude' )
    I have an ebook by 'Fred Anydude'. He appears in book view under the [Authors section] in the right place i.e. with those Authors whose last name begins with 'A', (because the sort artist field has been set up as 'Anydude, Fred'.) 
    Then I acquire a music album, also by Fred Anydude (Hey, what can I say, he's talented). The problem is in the music view in the Artist section I expect Fred Anydude, to appear with the other artists beginning with F (as is the convention for music artist sort order), but he doesnt. He's appears with the A's again. The sort artist is blank in the case of the music album and its songs. So I set up the sort artist for the album and its tracks as Fred Anydude. I switch views, to give the opportunity for a refresh, I even restart itunes - Fred Anydude is still being sorted according to his book view sort artist despite what I've set up for his music: Still appearing with the A's
    But to confuse matters, under Album view with the Album view sort order set to 'by Artist', the album does appear along with other artists beginning with F.
    To make matters worse if I do a search for Fred Anydude, I only get shown the book in the results. The music doesn't even appear.
    Is there a fix?

    I suppose a better way to differentiate between album artist and artist is to say Track Artist.

Maybe you are looking for

  • My homepage button is not working for my iphone 4 after installing ios 5

    my homepage button is not working for my iphone 4 after installing ios 5 has anyone got any suggestions please

  • QuickTime Error:-23

    QuickTime Error:-23 I have been getting this error in Compressor when I try to render out of FCP and have tried reinstalling FCP and Compressor and then QuickTime 7.6.4. Has anyone ever seen this. I am running OS 10.5.8 FCP 6.0.6 and QuickTime 7.6.4

  • Runtime error using net_rim_api.jar

    Hi. I was trying to use net_rim_api.jar in a web mobile application to use RadioInfo class. However whe I run the application to obtain MNC, MCC and LAC, I see the following error: javax.faces.el.EvaluationException: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: n

  • Merging Cells in Custom Section

    Is it possible to merge cells in Custom Sections similar to the merge cells functionality in Excel where you can merge 2 cells into 1 cell?

  • PDP - no entry in eprtrans

    SRM SERVER 550 SP13 R3 4.7 Classic Reorder point planning. When MRP runs and generates requistions the eprtrans table is not updated with the req. The req does have a procurement profile assigned in the eban table. The req is not subject to release a