ASSERTION_FAILED short dump when Transporting Transformation from Dev to QA

Hi Experts,
I' am getting a short Dump when transporting the transformations, DSO & DTPs from Dev server to QA.
I got RC=12, Please have a look below....
Transport log...
    BCQ        System BCQ
               Selection for Import                     08.07.2010 15:28:59    (0) Successfully Completed
               Import                                   08.07.2010 15:35:14    (0) Successfully Completed
               Check Versions                           08.07.2010 15:35:14    (0) Successfully Completed
               Method Execution                         08.07.2010 15:36:20   (12) Canceled
               Import                                   08.07.2010 15:45:39    (0) Successfully Completed
               Check Versions                           08.07.2010 15:45:39    (0) Successfully Completed
               Method Execution                         08.07.2010 15:46:45   (12) Canceled
and the Log detalis.....
Date        Time      Message
08.07.2010  15:35:15  Job started
08.07.2010  15:35:15  Step 001 started (program RDDEXECL, variant , user ID DDIC)
08.07.2010  15:35:15  All DB buffers of application server sxcat136 were synchronized
08.07.2010  15:35:21  STDO: Log  could not be written on output device T
08.07.2010  15:35:30  Replication completed successfully
08.07.2010  15:35:31  Struttura di comunicazione /BIC/CS8ZFIZIASA activated
08.07.2010  15:35:40  Regola(e) di trasm. 8ZFIZIASA_AA activated
08.07.2010  15:35:47  ABAP/4 processor: ASSERTION_FAILED
08.07.2010  15:35:47  Job cancelled
Even I've checked the entries on the table RSTRANRULE for those Transpormations but there I got...all the entries with...
RULEID = all numbers
GROUPID = '1' or '2'
GROUPTYPE = 'S' or 'T'
REF_RULE ='0'
we are in to SAP_BW Release 700, Level 0013, SP -SAPKW70013, SAP NetWeaver BI 7.0
Pls help if any one know's the solution for this.
Thanks in adv.
BR,
Ajay Kumar
Edited by: sap.ajaykumar on Jul 9, 2010 12:48 PM

Follow the steps mentioned in OSS note 998730.
FYI.. Solution:
Call transaction SE16 (Table Browser) and the 'RSTRANRULE' table with the following selection parameters:
GROUPID = 'space'
GROUPTYPE = 'space'
REF_RULE 'space'
If there are inconsistent entries in the RSTRANRULE table such as this:
TRANID *
OBJVERS *
RULEID *
SEQNR *
GROUPID 00
GROUPTYPE space
RULETYPE space
REF RULE *
Delete these entries from the table.
Activate the affected transformations.
Also check the OSS note: 1006658.
Follow the steps mentioned in OSS note 998730.
FYI.. Solution:
Call transaction SE16 (Table Browser) and the 'RSTRANRULE' table with the following selection parameters:
GROUPID = 'space'
GROUPTYPE = 'space'
REF_RULE 'space'
If there are inconsistent entries in the RSTRANRULE table such as this:
TRANID *
OBJVERS *
RULEID *
SEQNR *
GROUPID 00
GROUPTYPE space
RULETYPE space
REF RULE *
Delete these entries from the table.
Activate the affected transformations.
Also check the OSS note: 1006658.
Follow the steps mentioned in OSS note 998730.
FYI.. Solution:
Call transaction SE16 (Table Browser) and the 'RSTRANRULE' table with the following selection parameters:
GROUPID = 'space'
GROUPTYPE = 'space'
REF_RULE 'space'
If there are inconsistent entries in the RSTRANRULE table such as this:
TRANID *
OBJVERS *
RULEID *
SEQNR *
GROUPID 00
GROUPTYPE space
RULETYPE space
REF RULE *
Delete these entries from the table.
Activate the affected transformations.
Also check the OSS note: 1006658.
Also check the oSS note : Note 975675 - Transformation cannot be activated

Similar Messages

  • ASSERTION_FAILED, Short dump when activating Transformation in BI7.0

    Hi All,
    I have migrated 3.5 update rule to 7.0. And during transformation activation i am getting short dump giving following messges:
    "ASSERTION_FAILED"
    "CL_RSTRAN_GEN_STEP= = = = = CP"
    "CL_RSTRAN_GEN_STEP= = = = = CM005"
    "GET_CONTAINER"
    My system support pack is 15. I searched many OSS Notes but i am not able to get the exact soln.
    can anybody help me out with this problem?
    Regards,
    Harsh

    this error is generally due to inconsistency in metadata
    refer OSS note: 1071255, 1094266, 998730, 829353, 926854
    Try to implement this solution from OSS 998730:
    Call transaction SE16 (Table Browser) and the 'RSTRANRULE' table with the following selection parameters:
    GROUPID   =  'space'
    GROUPTYPE =  'space' or 'S'
    REF_RULE  <> 'space'
    If there are inconsistent entries in the RSTRANRULE table such as:
               TRANID        *
    OBJVERS        *
    RULEID        *
    SEQNR          *
    GROUPID        00
    GROUPTYPE      space  or  GROUPTYPE    'S'
    RULETYPE      space
    REF RULE       *
    Delete these entries from the table.
    Activate the affected transformations.
    Edited by: sam hennry on Feb 5, 2008 4:40 PM

  • Problem when transporting form from DEV system to PRODUCTION system

    Hi Experts,
    We are developing forms in ABAP, for example there is a form developed in dev system and this form has JS coding in some UI elements events like initialize, on change and on exit; also has one script object defined as variable. this script object has some functions defined in order to do some common validations and field specific ones too.
    The form in DEV work fine, all the functions calling, all the validations and the events are working properly as expected. But there is a problem when we moved the changes done in development system into production system. Specifically the script object has the problem: even though the coding is the same in both systems, in production system we had an script error: "Body.CATALOGPARAMS has no properties", as if the Body.CATALOGPARAMS was never instanciated, or it is not defined...
    The code that produces this error is the following:
    var itemCount = 0;
    itemCount = Body.CATALOGPARAMS.DATA.instanceManager.count;
    CATALOGPARAMS is table defined as context table coming from an ABAP FM where is filled and passed into the form.
    In order to fix this problem I changed that part for the following
    var itemCount = 0;
    var catalogTable = null;
    catalogTable = xfa.resolveNode("Body.CATALOGPARAMS.DATA");
    itemCount = catalogTable.instanceManager.count;
    This still works as fine as the other in DEV system. But my question is: will I have the same problem when we transport the changes to production system, you have to know that a transport is not something that you can do every day, so I am taking precautions before the transport. Which of both coding is the best for doing this?
    Any observations, comments, questions in order to clarify some points are welcome, so please do it.
    In advance, thanks a lot.
    Mauricio.-
    Edited by: Mauricio Poblete on May 11, 2010 4:20 PM

    As always, you are the first one to reply... thanks for that!
    before everything, I activated the form, then I added this form to a new transport using se80 transaction: I navigated through the form objects and I added the form to a new transport by second click on the form -> other functions -> write transport entry. is this the correct way to assign a transport package with the entire form (including script objects, layouts, and all you told in the last reply)??
    Can you give me a guide on how-to add the specific parts to the same transport for forms?
    as always, thanks in advance.
    Mauricio.-

  • Problem when i transported  DTP from DEV to QA

    I am facing a problem when i transported  DTP from DEV to QA   It is not in the folder were it have to be,but i can see it in RSBKDTP table of QA

    Hi,
    One info regarding DTP, Technical name will get differ from system to system through out the landscape ( Dev, QA, Prod) . So you have to search with Description of the DTP instead of technical name.
    Regards,
    Sridevi.

  • Short Dump When Installing Key Figure Catalog from BI Content

    Hi Friends,
                    I get a Short dump when trying to Install a Key Figure Catalog (in Purchasing) from the BI content. This is what the Error Says ,
    " You Attempted to Use a "NULL" object reference (Points to nothing) access a component (variable : "  "). An Object reference must point to an object (an instance of class ) before it can be used to access components.
    Any input will be greatly appreciated,

    Hi Michal,
    this bug hits only patch level 201 of the DBSL. Please update the DBSl.
    Regarding the ABAP code I do not believe that the hint helps in this case but it should not cause any problems either. If this hint is applied more PREPARE calls are neccessary since before every execution a new statement text is assembled.
    The advantage of SUBSTITUTE_VALUES hints is that the database optimizer get more information through the statement text. The downside is that a new statement is generated every time. E.g. you won't find the statement as a top scorer in a SQL cache analysis if the access plan is still bad.
    Regards
                   Frank

  • RSA1 - Datasources ASSERTION_FAILED short dump

    Hello,
    We are getting a short dump (ASSERTION_FAILED) when clicking on Datasources tab in RSA1 -> Modeling. This was working fine till yesterday afternoon. The last action I performed was to activate all transfer structures in My self source system using RS_TRANSU_ACTIVATE_ALL. I searched on service marketplace but couldn't find any note relevant to our error.
    Everything else works fine. Please advise.
    We are on BI SP14.
    This is the log from st22.
    Short text
        The ASSERT condition was violated.
    What happened?
        In the running application program, the ASSERT statement recognized a
        situation that should not have occurred.
        The runtime error was triggered for one of these reasons:
        - For the checkpoint group specified with the ASSERT statement, the
          activation mode is set to "abort".
        - Via a system variant, the activation mode is globally set to "abort
          for checkpoint groups in this system.
        - The activation mode is set to "abort" on program level.
        - The ASSERT statement is not assigned to any checkpoint group.
    Error analysis
        The following checkpoint group was used: "No checkpoint group specified"
        If in the ASSERT statement the addition FIELDS was used, you can find
        the content of the first 8 specified fields in the following overview:
        " (not used) "
        " (not used) "
        " (not used) "
        " (not used) "
        " (not used) "
        " (not used) "
        " (not used) "
        " (not used) "
    How to correct the error
        Probably the only way to eliminate the error is to correct the program.
        If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to
        find an interim solution in an SAP Note.
        If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following
        keywords:
        "ASSERTION_FAILED" " "
        "CL_RSAWBN_TREE_VIEW===========CP" or "CL_RSAWBN_TREE_VIEW===========CM00K"
        "EXPAND_NODE"
    Best Regards
    RT
    null

    Hello Voodi,
    998730 talks about the short dump when changing/activating transformations.
    We got the short dump when trying to get into Datasources tab. Though we are on BI, as i mentioned earlier the last action i performed was to activate transfer structures (For 3.x statistical datasources).
    Still, I checked the table contents as mentioned in the note. It was not of much help. Any other thoughts?
    Thanks.
    Message was edited by:
            SAPBI IP

  • Regarding Short Dump While loading data from DB Connect

    Dear All,
    We are having an issue of getting short dump while loading data from DB Connect to BW. We were able to load the data into BW Dev using the same data source without any problem. Whereas in Production, I am getting the following error:
    Runtime Error          PERFORM_CONFLICT_TAB_TYPE  
    Except.                   CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_TYPE
    What could be the reason for the error that I am getting

    hi,
    Refer Note 707986 - Writing in trans. InfoCubes: PERFORM_CONFLICT_TAB_TYPE
    Summary
    Symptom
    When data is written to a transactional InfoCube, the termination PERFORM_CONFLICT_TAB_TYPE occurs. The short dump lists the following reasons for the termination:
    ("X") The row types of the two tables are incompatible.
    ("X") The table keys of the two tables do not correspond.
    Other terms
    transactional InfoCube, SEM, BPS, BPS0, APO
    Reason and Prerequisites
    The error is caused by an intensified type check in the ABAP runtime environment.
    Solution
    Workaround for BW 3.0B (SP16-19), BW 3.1 (SP10-13)
    Apply the attached correction instructions.
    BW 3.0B
    Import Support Package 20 for 3.0B (BW3.0B Patch20 or SAPKW30B20) into your BW system. The Support Package is available oncenote 0647752 with the short text "SAPBWNews BW3.0B Support Package 20", which describes this Support Package in more detail, has been released for customers.
    BW 3.10 Content
    Import Support Package 14 for 3.10 (BW3. 10 Patch14 or SAPKW31014) into your BW system. The Support Package is available once note 0601051 with the short text "SAPBWNews BW 3.1 Content Support Package 14" has been released for customers.
    BW3.50
    Import Support Package 03 for 3.5 (BW3.50 Patch03 or SAPKW35003) into your BW system. The Support Package is available once note 0693363 with the short text "SAPBWNews BW 3.5 Support Package 03", which describes this Support Package in more detail, has been released for customers.
    The notes specified may already be available to provide advance information before the Support Package is released. However, in this case, the short text still contains the term "Preliminary version" in this case.
    Header Data
    Release Status: Released for Customer
    Released on: 18.02.2004 08:11:39
    Priority: Correction with medium priority
    Category: Program error
    Primary Component: BW-BEX-OT-DBIF Interface to Database
    Secondary Components: FIN-SEM-BPS Business Planning and Simulation
    Releases
    Software
    Component Release From
    Release To
    Release And
    subsequent
    SAP_BW 30 30B 30B
    SAP_BW 310 310 310
    SAP_BW 35 350 350
    Support Packages
    Support
    Packages Release Package
    Name
    SAP_BW_VIRTUAL_COMP 30B SAPK-30B20INVCBWTECH
    Related Notes
    693363 - SAPBWNews BW SP03 NW'04 Stack 03 RIN
    647752 - SAPBWNews BW 3.0B Support Package 20
    601051 - SAPBWNews BW 3.1 Content Support Package 14
    Corrections Instructions
    Correction
    Instruction Valid
    from Valid
    to Software
    Component Ref.
    Correction Last
    Modifcation
    301776 30B 350 SAP_BW J19K013852 18.02.2004 08:03:33
    Attributes
    Attribute Value
    weitere Komponenten 0000031199
    Thanks
    (Activate ODS/Cube and Transfer rules again..)

  • Transport Error from Dev to QA.

    Hi All,
    We r facing transport error while transporting req from Dev to QA,
    Created queries in dev and try to trasport in QA.
    Error:
    Execution of programs after import (XPRA)
    Transport request   : BD1K922532
    System              : BQ1
    tp path             : tp
    Version and release: 372.04.29 700
    Execution of programs after import (XPRA)
    End date and time : 20091022031634
    Ended with return code:  ===> 8 <==
    what could be the reason?
    Regards,
    SD

    Hi.
    I have collected all neccessary object which query contains, but after releasing the request it shows the message,
    The request contains message that have already been edited & transported to other projects. To avoid overshooter problem when importing you need to create dependency information for the request with which object were last transported. The requiered information is listed here together with the existing information.
    Should i go ahed with above message???? Is there any dependency?
    Regards,
    SD

  • Short Dump when trying to open C-project due to status

    Hi,
    We have a daily batch job in CRM that reports all the project ID's and
    sends e-mails out to recipients.
    As part of this report it retrieves the statuses for the project ID's,
    however the report short dumps when retrieving the status for one of
    the projects because it is not finding an active status.
    When we try and open the project in C-projects we get the same short
    dump error: CX_DPR_FATAL_ERROR so we cannot view or update the status.
    When we investigate this issue we find that in table CRM_JCDS there are
    3 entries for this project ID. One of the statuses is inactive (I1703)
    but there is another status that is active (I1701). The two status
    entries were created at exactly the same date and time and by the same
    user.
    In table CRM_JEST there is only one entry shown which shows an inactive
    status and we believe this to be the wrong status. Please can you
    advise if this status conflict is causing the problem and also how to
    resolve this issue?

    Hi Paul,
    generally, the project and its elements must have an active status in table CRM_JEST, however, at this point it is not clear how this inconsistency arised. There is no SAP standard report or a 'generally valid' solution that could solve this issue, however, I found a customer message that you have opened in September with exactly the same problem. A colleague from the development team already provided you with a correction report, but there was no feedback from your side if it helped or not.
    It is very difficult to provide help as inconsistencies can have several different causes, so the best would be to have this checked in a customer message with an example.
    Regards,
    Silvia

  • GETWA_NOT_ASSIGNED short dump when load business partner master data

    Hi
    I've this error GETWA_NOT_ASSIGNED short dump when load business partner master data, it's running in BI 7.0 with support package 12.
    The error is because the field symbol is that pointed to the line of an internal table that was deleted.
    I think that it's an incompatibility between subroutine and unicode.
    Do you have idea about correct this error?
    Regards
    Jose.

    Hi Ravi
    Yes, it's a dump
    It's when running a process chain to load Business partner master data
    The error say:
    -.You address a field symbol that pointed to the line of an internal table that was deleted.
    -.You address a field symbol that was previously reset using UNASSIGN or that pointed to a local field that no longer exist.
    -. You address a global function interface, although the respective function module is not active - that is, is not in the list of active calls. the list of active calls can be taken from this short dump.
    I think that it's for the unicode corversion because I've the last support package 12 installed and the rest of the process chain are running perfect.
    My hotmail mail is [email protected] if you need the screen shot.
    Regards and thanks a lot
    Jose

  • Transporting workflows from DEV to QA

    Hi I have three queries.
    1. When we transport wokflows from Dev to QA the agent assignment for tasks does not get transported. For eg. If we set a task as a general task in Dev, it does not get transported to QA. What do I do to ensure that the agent assignment and the task classification gets transported.
    2. Also when we transport the workflow, if our workflow is triggered by events, the event linkage is inactive.(header data for the workflow template). How do I ensure that the event linkage stays active after we transport the WF to QA.
    3. How do I transport organizations assignments to QA (transaction PPOM, PPOC stuff). It does not create a transport request when we create a new org. structure, positions, jobs etc.
    Help would be appreciated.
    Regards.

    Vijay,
    All the questions have been answered a few times on the SAP-WUG forum. You can search the forums using Google. Type
    <b><u>Search Term(s ) site:http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug</u></b> and hit the search button.
    Come back if you still need help.
    Also please note that Business Process Management is now designated as the forum for Workflow questions.
    Cheers,
    Ramki Maley .

  • Short Dump when the Bex-Report scheduled for Broadcast

    Hi Guru's
    I am getting the short dump when I am scheduling the Bex-Report for Broadcasting. Need your help to reslove this issue.
    Thanks
    Navin
    Note
    The following error text was processed in the system BDV : The current application triggered a termination with a short dump.
    The error occurred on the application server spdbwd01_BDV_05 and in the work process 0 .
    The termination type was: RABAX_STATE
    The ABAP call stack was:
    Form: INTERNAL_ERROR of program SAPLSDCL
    Form: PHIO_GET_CONTENT_ACCESS of program SAPLSDCI
    Function: SDOK_PHIO_GET_CONTENT_ACCESS of program SAPLSDCI
    Function: SKWF_PHIO_CONTENT_ACCESS_GET of program SAPLSKWF_CONTENT
    Method: COPY_MIME_TO_FOLDER of program CL_RSRA_KWF_UTILITIES=========CP
    Method: GET_STYLESHEET of program CL_RSRA_KWF_TMPL==============CP
    Method: CONSTRUCTOR of program CL_RSRA_KWF_TMPL==============CP
    Method: SET_TEMPLATE_FOLDER of program CL_RSRA_ENGINE_BC=============CP
    Method: CONSTRUCTOR of program CL_RSRA_ENGINE_BC=============CP
    Method: EXECUTE_SINGLE of program CL_RSRA_JOB===================CP

    HI Navin,
    Check the short dump analysis in T-code ST22.
    and also check the Information Broadcast Settings / Configuration
    Check the error for Emails in t-code SCOT. BASIS Consultants will help you on this issue.
    Regards
    Daya Sagar

  • Facing short dumps when trying to open session in CSA

    Hi
    All am facing Short dump when i am trying to open session in CSA
    Error detials:
    go to System Administration workcenter  task management up CSA. Choose the Solution
    got short dump:
    Short text
        Length error occurred in IMPORT statement.
    What happened?
        Error in the ABAP Application Program
        The current ABAP program "SAPLDSVAS_PROC" had to be terminated because it has
        come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    Error analysis
        An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
        The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_IMPORT_MISMATCH_ERROR', was
         not caught in
        procedure "LOAD" "(METHOD)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING clause.
        Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the
        exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
        The reason for the exception is:
        During import the system discovered that the target object has
        a different length than the object to be imported.
    Missing RAISING Clause in Interface
        Program                                 SAPLDSVAS_PROC
        Include                                 LDSVAS_PROCTAI
        Row                                     1.431
        Module type                             (METHOD)
        Module Name                             LOAD
    Trigger Location of Exception
        Program                                 SAPLDSVAS_PROC
        Include                                 LDSVAS_PROCTAI
        Row                                     1.514
        Module type                             (METHOD)
        Module Name                             LOAD
    Please help me to solve this problem
    Regards,
    Neni

    Hello Neni
    According to the information I saw in that post it could be caused by a sort of inconsistency of the program code vs a structure.
    Wether that is a bug that is in your SAP Solution Manager release or something that is caused by administrative actions (perhaps solving SPAU entries after SP stack update or upgrade) I cannot tell.
    I would recommend you either try and find a relative SAP note (narrowing down result to only your SAP Solution Manager system) and searching using the dump keywords. If you cannot find anything I would recommend you to open a customer message so SAP can take a look at the specific error.
    If you give more information, perhaps someone on the forum can help you out abit better, which SAP Solution Manager version and so on.
    You also didn't answer my question, any recent changes you are aware of ?
    Kind regards
    Tom

  • What is the best Method to transport KMC from DEV to QA & PROD

    We are trying to figure out what is the best method to transport KMC from DEV to QA & PROD. Your help and feedback is greatly appreciated.
    David

    hi,
    Refer this thread.
    How to transport KM content and configration?
    Regards,
    Ganesh N

  • Short dump when we write more than 4 routines or formulas 4 one source fld

    Hi Experts ,
    We have one source field in a DSO which supplies data to 9 other characteristics present in the cube via formulas. But the system throws a short dump when we write more than 4 routines or formulas.
    Please let us know if there is any restriction in BI 7 as to let only 4 formulas to be written for one source field.
    The below is the description of the short dump
    RUNTIME ERROR : SAP SQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC
    EXCEPTION : CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB
    Help done would be assigned points ...
    Thanks,
    Santosh ...

    Hi,
    thanks for your input
    Rd, rt,re and rs are ranges.
    Select ranges
      RANGES: rd FOR ZMOBILEDATA-COMPID,
              rs FOR ZMOBILEDATA-SUBSCRIBERS,
              rt FOR ZMOBILEDATA-TURNOVER,
              re FOR ZMOBILEDATA-ENTRYDATE.
    thanks'

Maybe you are looking for