Asset Balances not tally to GL Balances with small difference .1 paisa

Hi Guru,
Asset balance report- s_alr_87011964 not tally to GL balance- FBL3N with a small difference .1 paisa,Please sombody can help me solve this issue.
Advance thanks.
Thanks,
ND

Hi,
You need to pass some manual entries through OASV.
Values appear in asset reports are coming from AS91.
Entries passed through OASV are update in gl accounts.
Before passing the entries please check the values.
Hope this will clear.
Regards,
Sankar

Similar Messages

  • Asset report not tally to GL balance

    Hi Expert,
    When I view report S_ALR_87011965-by Business Area and compared to FS10N view by business area as well but some how the figures are difference. Anybody know what's wrong and how to check what caused the difference?
    thanks

    Hi Max,
    Which figure are you comparing? The acquisition value or the depreciation value?
    Cheers

  • AR balances not tally wth GL balances

    Hi Experts,
    When comparing the GL account balance (AR reconciliation account) VS customer balances in local currency report (FI-AR),noticed that there is a differences.
    And after checking I foud out that the differences are due to the reconciliation account changed in the customer master. (version - 4.6C)
    If I add up two recon GL a/c, I still ties back the balance.
    But now I need a solution on how to ties back the both balances in GL and in AR .
    Has anybody come across this problem before.
    Appreciate your kind assistance on this
    Many thanks!

    Hi Sidhar,
    In terms of system, yes it should behave this way.
    For example:
    Currently,
    Recon. GL 1234 balance = 10,000
    Recon GL 5678 balance = 20,000
    Report S_ALR_87012172 - Customer Balances in Local Currency, put recon G/L a/c as 1234 and it show balance as 9,500, i believe the logic of this report is to call the balance according to the current recon. a/c that set in customer master.
    (so if the earlier, the reconciliation a/c change from 1234 to 5678, and then they changed back from 5678 to 1234).
    So when posting the entries, it will follow the recon a/c maintained during posting, so that caused the difference between both balance, right?
    Then my problem is the finance wants to get both balances to be agreed to avoid the auditors quesntion on the difference.
    Meaning the AR balance need to ties back GL balance.
    Is it possible to do this ? If yes how to adjust back ?
    Appreciate your advice?

  • Trail balance(FGI3) and G/L balance not tally (FBL3N)

    Hi Experts,
    I have a problem. My trail balance(FGI3) and G/L balance not tally (FBL3N). Please give me suggestion for checking this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Hemant Maurya

    Hi,
    Now you are getting differences of balances for p/l accounts or balance sheet accounts.
    For P/L accounts at every year balance carryforward to Profit and loss account. But you check the balances through T.code FBL3N you will get cummumlative balance. So better check the balance with T.code FAGLB03.
    If the problem with balance sheet then just test carryforward balances to new fiscal year once again in test run so that you will come to know if there is any difference in value.
    Regards,
    Sankar

  • Validation for GL balance not go to credit balance.

    Validation for GL balance not go to credit balance
    while using  T-code  f-02 how to make posting validation if  cash   GL  balance  goes in credit. exp. say  in cash Gl  debit  balance  is  1000/-  and make the payment  of 1500/- error should reflect . payment  is more than available cash.

    Hi,
    You can try following Business Transaction Events in FIBF.
    00001011     POST DOCUMENT:       Checks at line item level
    00001020     POST DOCUMENT:       Prior to final checks
    00001030     POST DOCUMENT:       Posting of standard data
    00001050     POST DOCUMENT:       Accounting interface
    00001025     POST DOCUMENT:       Final checks completed
    Just sit with your ABAPer and tell hin your logic and show this Business Transaction Events.
    Regards,
    Jigar

  • Automatic Clearing with Small Difference

    Hi all,
    I want to one GL Account to Automatic Clearing (f.13) with Small Difference consider with another GL account.
    Manual Clearing Working is fine.
    Regards,
    Spradip
    Edited by: spradip on Dec 20, 2011 1:24 PM

    you will have to setup the open item clearing config
    GL based tolerances
    tolerance grp
    assigning tolerance grp to users
    have a clearing GL to clear the difference amount.
    If these are setup correctly, the clearing is possible.
    once this config is setup, try manual clearing once and then use the same GL as part of F.13.
    if you have problems and If you are an ABAP savvy, try debugging and catch hold of what is it looking for....usually the above setting should help you clear.

  • FAGLB03 peroid balance not tallying with line items within

    Hi,
    When i go to FAGLB03 and tally  the balance of a recon account for a particular month with the line items in it, it does not tally
    This is happening for one period within the fiscal year, others period balance tally with the line items
    What can be the solution for this?
    Regards,
    Parin

    Hi Parin,
    You did not confirm still whether the account in FAGLF03 is the same account that you  are trying to view.
    This issue will require careful analysis in the system as there could be more than one reasons.One of the likely possibilities is missing BSIS line items. As it is a technical reconciliation issue, please create a message for processing.
    FBL3N report that you executed also points towards that. I hope that  you ran the report for all items posted in that period.
    If you ran it only for open items, then there is also a possibility of a possible clearing issue.
    Anyway , the best route will be to open a message in FI inconsistencies component and let SAP investigate further.,
    Best Regards,
    Shrikant

  • India - Business Partner Opening Balance not displayed in Trial Balance

    Hi All,
    I am using SAP B1 from 1st April 2007. (SAP B1 2007 B PL 08)
    I have executed the year end procedure for financial year 2007 , that is 1st April 2007 to 31st March 2008.
    Now when I view trial balance, I noticed that a customer whose closing balance is Rs.2080 Debit, as on 31st March 2008, is not shown as Opening balance in Trial balance as well as General Ledger.
    Even I have an journal entry for same customer for Rs.2080 Credit on 1st April 2008 - First day of Finanacial year 2008, So Closing Balance as on 1st April 2008 is Rs.0, But if I want to see the opening balance as on 1st April 2008 i.e. Rs.2080, it is not displayed even if I select Opening Balance in Expand option.
    BR
    Samir Gandhi

    Tick mark Add closing balance in selection creteria,Remove tick mark in expanded selection.
    Refer this doc. Influence of selection creteria in financial reports.
    https://websmp101.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000689302007E/
    Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on May 2, 2009 6:01 PM

  • PLA Rgd and GL balances not tally

    Hi Gurus,
    We done so many mistakes in the system for excise transactions of PLA due to it the PLA register and PLA GLs are not matching with correct values. At least this FY onwards we need to use PLA & PLA GL Acs with correct values. For this we have an option to rectify in previous FY only (still it is not closed) for rectifications. So suggest me to do rectifications.  thanks in advance....
    Rdg
    Surya
    Edited by: Consultant555 on Apr 26, 2010 1:11 PM
    Edited by: Consultant555 on Apr 26, 2010 1:12 PM

    Hi gurus any Idea ????

  • Company code currency balance not equal Group currency balance

    Dear experts,
    Some of our account balances are inconsistent bewteen the company code and the group amount. This company has the same currency in both the company code and group currrencies which are USD. The exchange quotation is also setup in OB08 with 1 in both dir / indir quote. Below is an example for a HKD expenses with a HKD AP account.
    GL accounts setup with same currency as company code / group currency.
    Exchange quotation setup in OB08 for HKD to USD is dir.qut. 7.8 and indir.quot 7.8.
    After translation, the result supposed to be,
    In Document currency, Dr expenses HKD780, Cr AP HKD780
    In Local currency (company code currency), Dr expenses USD100, Cr AP USD100
    In Group currency, Dr exepnses USD100, Cr AP USD100
    However, the current result is,
    In Document currency, Dr expenses HKD780, Cr AP HKD780
    In Local currency (company code currency), Dr expenses USD100, Cr AP USD100
    In Group currency, Dr exepnses USD110, Cr AP USD110
    The amount in local and group currency should be the same supposedly as they are in the same currency.
    Have anyone ever experienced the same situation?

    Thanks all,
    I have checked that both 1st local currency (company code currency) and 2nd local currency (group currency) are USD.
    Our user also didn't change the group currency amount during data entry as there seems no way to alter the amount as it is greyed out.
    Is there any other configuration or system flow that may be configured to post these 2 currency amount in a different way of translation?

  • Cash opening balance not in FBCJ opening balance

    HAI,
    Balance is updated through LSMW. But the cash balance is showing in the GL account, but the same is not showing in FBCJ opening balance. Can any one tell me the problem or where i want to maintain.
    govind.

    hi
    I WANT PUT OP. BALANCE IN ALL LEDGERS. HOW CAN I PUT OP.BAL IN LEDGERS IN INITIAL STAGE ?
    can u please tell me ?
    my email [email protected]

  • To make a new site or not? (for branch office with small number of people)

    We have a main office, with our DC (DC01) and a single site (SiteHO), and we are about to open up a new branch office in another city.  This branch office is connected to the head office via a 5 Mbps MPLS network.  The branch office will have around
    5-7 domain joined workstations, and the people there will require access to the existing file and exchange servers in the head office. 
    I was thinking about not adding a RODC in the branch office and not creating another site in AD for the branch office either.  My thinking is that since the number of users is relatively low, it doesn't warrant having a new RODC and site.  The
    traffic generated by the 5-7 user logon activities will be minimal, and the local profiles are stored on the workstations (no roaming profiles), so there shouldn't be much WAN link impact.  Obviously I would have to add the subnet from the branch office
    to the SiteHO site. 
    Can anybody think of something wrong with my reasoning?

    I think the dedicated line has a little to do with AD since its used both to authenticate the users and move the data.
    I am not sure what bandwith you get from an internet provider in your location, but for example you might get a 100Mb internet connection from an ISP. A VPN tunnel over a 100Mb internet connection I am guessing is faster then a 5Mb guaranteed MPLS link.
    The advantage of MPLS is that you can have QoS policies for voice and video traffic.
    If users move 'very large files' perhaps a local file server might be an good option. DFS replication can save a lot of bandwidth in that case. And then you would have 'local resources' in the branch and in case of wan failure the users will not be able
    to access the local file server resource. So you would need a secondary DC in that location.
    And if they are moving the files think (and check) the impact on the MPLS, because authentication requests go through that link, Exchange traffic (RPC MAPI) goes through that link so these might be affected. For example, lets say you have 2GB mailboxes.
    All Outlook users use OST files. One user's profile gets corrupted and needs to be rebuilt. The Outlook client sets up a fresh OST copy of the mailbox so now its downloading a 2GB mailbox copy over a 5Mb MPLS while some other user is moving a 'large file'.
    By local resources I am referring to file servers, printers, applications in the branch location that require AD authentication. Authentication works with both VPN and MPLS and in case the wan/vpn is down users can even log in with
    cached credentials.
    Hope it helps.
    http://mariusene.wordpress.com/

  • NET BOOK VALUE OF THE ASSETS NOT APPEARING IN THE BALANCE SHEET

    Hi,
        I have uploaded the old assets by using the T.code As91, but the values of the assets are not appearing in the Balance Sheet.Please help in solving this issue
    Ramaswamy

    Hi
    After loading the asset thro AS91, there is a transaction OASV thro which you need to update the GL accounts. 
    Thanks
    Ashok
    Assign points to say thanks

  • Assets balance Report(T Cd s_alr_87011964) Not Tally with GL Code in FBL3N

    Hi Friends
    SAP Standard Assets balance Report(T Code s_alr_87011964 and s_alr_87011963 ) Not Tally with GL Code in FBL3N.
    In SAP report coming with Report Date but FBL3N coming with Posting Date
    So How I add Posting Date input parameter in Sap Standard Report. Please help me
    Thanks & Regards,
    Hemant Kumar

    Hi Vinod,
    I hoe that you are doing reconcilation between Asset ledger & FI ledgers. Before that just run ABST ,there u can findout whatever the documents not assigned to FI.
    Asset is subledger to GL.It is automatically updated through determination,while post GRN to capital goods.In somecases bsuiness remove the reconcilation acount and do some adjustments that time that report not match with FBL3N.
    You can run ABST then u can get details
    Best rgds
    Mani

  • AR01 REPORT IS NOT TALLYING WITH GL BALANCE

    Dear SAP Guru's
    AR01 report is not tallying with CWIP gl. during our observation, we found that out of four CWIP assets two of them showing over balance and two of them showing under balance. but when i tried for settling these assets to actual assets, system shows no value for settlement. But when i try for Scrapping, system is allowing for scrapping from these CWIP assets. In General, when ever value is lying in the CWIP, system will allow for settlement, but why in these case it is not allowing. What could be the reason ..for .CWIP assets shows Under/Over value. 
    Please advice.
    regds

    Dear Ravi..
    Thanks for your early reply...
    01. As per the Program documentation, it shows that these report should be executed only before year end closing.
          Is there any effect if i execute now.
    02. For Your information, i know the exact difference of balance which both AR01 and CWIP GL shows, so to what extent this program ABST2)will help.
    03.It would be helpful to me  if you have any solution to resolve it.
    04. Actually this problem was existing from more than 3 fiscal years...our auditors did not recognize it..now management recognised and want to rectify. If i reverse any entries it will effect previous Statutory reports, so without effecting the previous statements i have resolve it.
    Regds,

Maybe you are looking for