Asset not in company code

Dear all
I am entering a purchase order referncing from requisition, its standard purchase order  while procesing it  system is giving an error  "Asset 0 not in company code"
Thanks
Rashid

If you are not wanting to make an assets purchase order, you will have to remove the account assignment category "A" from the line item of the purchase order.
If you have entered any account assignment category then you might notice a new tab in the item detail where it asks you for the asset number.
Regards,
Jijo

Similar Messages

  • Error Asset 0 not in company code during creation of service puchase order

    Dear All,
    I am getting the following error while creating service order in ME21N. My account assignment category "P" and Item category "D".
                       The error message is "Asset 0 not in company code"
    Kindly give your suggestions to solve this problem.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Manivel.S

    HI,
    as per me if you are using P then you have to give WBS element in PO
    P nothing but direct consumption for project stock
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Error in ASKB "Asset 1-177 0 not in company code LX01'

    Hi Experts,
    Until Jan. 2009, only 1 depreciation area is activated for company code LX01 (01). For some assets, we had retirements/write-up postings. Came Feb. 2009, dep.area 10 was activated.
    With 2009 year-end closing AJAB, the process found an error ' Transactions not periodically posted'. This error upon analysing was due to those assets posted with retirements/write-ups (Jan. 09) and mentioned that ASKB needs to be executed for these assets for deparea 10. It's logical that there are no postings on these new accounts for January and the system should not ask them. For example there also are no depreciation postings in area 10 for January and this does not generate any problem. Then, why in ERP, the ASKB for deparea 10 is needed for those related assets?
    Also, I tried to process ASKB for deparea 10 to complete, but another error prompted: Message AA001 'Asset 1-177 0 not in company code LX01'. With this error message, I changed the 'Deactivation on' field in the masterdata and tried to rerun ASKB, but still this error exists. Would you know why or how this error could be eliminated?
    Kindly help.
    Thanks in advance.
    jandaph

    Hi,
    According to the error message, it seems like The asset does not exist in your company code.
    Please check again.
    Thanks,
    Srinu

  • Asset 50000 1 not in company code 1000

    Hello Friends,
    I'm able to create the assets, but afer creation of assets, when i'm going to see in display/Change mode system prompting the following message.
    Asset 50000 1 not in company code 1000
    Message no. AA001
    Diagnosis
    The asset number 50000 1 you entered, does not exist in company code 1000.
    System Response
    Processing cannot be continued.
    Procedure
    Correct your entry.
    It is also possible that this asset is defined as a group asset. In that case, it cannot be used as an asset.
    I'm able to see the asset when i press F4 button, but why system prompting this message i don't have clue.
    Please help me on this.
    Rgds
    Swapna Murali

    Hi Ravi,
    Controlling area and Company code details are proper. I have to check the SAP Notes which you have provided. What are the conditions to receive this message?
    I have created many assets before in the same company. Yesterday when i was using transaction AS03 to see one asset, system displayed the error message that particular asset was locked by me eventhough I was not doing anything with that Asset. So I used transaction SM12 to delete the lock entries. Later on I checked the transaction AS03 to see the asset, strangely system displaying the error message that particular asset is not availble in the Company code. I have created another asset aswell for testing, the same error message is continuing for this asset also. System is not displaying any error messagewhile creating the asset and displaying error message while display and change mode.
    Please advice me.
    Rgds
    Swapna

  • Settlement of WBS to the Fixed Asset in another company code

    Hi Friends,
    I have another problem with WBS elements and fixed assets.
    I used WBS elements to create a AUC by AUC settlement in company code A. Then I put a second settlement rule with settlement type "FUL" in WBS element and settle AUC to a depreciable asset in company code A.  Then I transfer the depreciable asset from company code A to company code B. Now I put the current month as the end day of the second settlement rule and add a third settlement rule in WBS element in compnay code A. The third settlement rule will settle to the depreciable asset in company B. When I am adding the third settlement rule, the system gives an error: "Asset XXXX not in company code A" .
    Then I add another WBS element in company code A and put a settlement rule which settle to the depreciable asset in company code B. The system did not issue any error. Everything works fine.
    So it seems the WBS element cannot settle to the asset in the other company code if it created a AUC in its own company code.
    People told me that it worked in their legacy SAP system. So I am wondering whether there is some settings that I did not do, which caused this problem.
    Do you have any idea about this?
    Thanks,
    Ting

    in the requesting company codeon the wbs master data enter the company code for which the AuC and the fixed asset will be created
    in this way you can settle from a project in one company code to an asset in another company code

  • Transfer asset from one company code and to another company code

    Hi Guru
    we have one issue in transfering of asset from one company code to another company code by tocde ABT1N as we get the error transaction type cannot be used for activity retmet from interco.transfer w/o rev to affil.co message no aapo176
    any appropriate method to do transfer and what is the settings we should take care for this
    kind regards
    sunitha
    Edited by: sunitha reddy on Sep 1, 2010 2:22 PM

    Hi Sunitha,
    You should also check the following customizing settings in case of AAPO176 in ABT1N:
    It could be that your transaction type that is mentioned in your error code AAPO176 cannot be used for 'Acquisition from intercompany transfer'.
    In this case check the default transaction types your customizing in Asset Accounting - Transactions - Specify Default Transaction Types.        
    Check if the same default transaction type for 'Acquisition from INTERcompany transfer' is also used for 'Acquisition from INTRAcompany transfer'.
    If not, then this is possibly the reason for the error AAPO176.       
    The transaction types for 'Acquisition from intercompany transfer' AND 'Acquisition from intracompany transfer' should be same as the standard transaction type 158 (please also review SAP note 196012). Both transaction types must be customized the same if you use your own customized transaction types...if one is different than the other, that would also be a reason for AAPO176 to be triggered.                                                                               
    I hope this information helps in addition.
    Kind regards,
    Brigitte

  • PO creation-ME21n-Why SAP does not check company code and Plant relation

    Hi All,
    Does someone know, why SAP does not check Plant and company code relation at the time of PO creation or how can we put validation between plant and company code at the time of PO creation.
    <b>Example:</b> Suppose i have a company 0001 which is assinged to Plant 0001. when i am creating a PO with another company code 0002(Entering at header level-Org, data) and using Plant 0001 at line item level. SAP does not do this validation.
    How can we put this check in place?
    Thanks in advance.
    Deepak

    Hello Deepak,
    There are three types of purchasing
    - Company code specific :You need to assign company code to Pur organization
    - Plant specific : You must assign plant to pur organization
    - Cross company purchasing: No assignment between company code and pur organization.
    In the case 3, the system will not check company code and plant relationship, but it will check plant and pur organization specific.
    The following is the copy of sap help text:
    You can assign a purchasing organization to one company code. This is company-specific purchasing.
    You can assign a purchasing organization to no company code. This purchasing organization can then procure for all plants assigned to it, irrespective of the company code to which the plant belongs.
    Since each plant must be assigned to a company code, the company code can be determined via the plant in each procurement transaction, even if the procuring purchasing organization is not assigned to a company code.
    A purchasing organization must be assigned to one or more plants. This is plant-specific purchasing.
    Now, check your company-code and purchase organization assignment.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards
    Arif Mansuri

  • Error in testing an idoc -Trans. XK01 : CoCde not entered; company code are

    Hi
    I am getting the following error when i am trying to test a idoc thru we 19.
    The message type is CREMAS and it is an inbound idoc ,I am testing the function module
    idoc_input_creditor .
    Trans. XK01 : CoCde not entered; company code area not being edited
    I have entered   the company code in E1LFBWM segment  but still getting the same error .
    Can some one advise how this error can be solved
    Thanks in advance
    Anjali

    Hi ,
    Have you entered Company code value in all the required segments ? Like E1LFB1M , E2LFB5M..
    Regards,
    Deepthi

  • Asset transfer from company code to company code

    Hi ,
    I want to transfer assets from one company code located in India to another company code located in the US. The existing configuration is as under.
    Both the the company codes share the same "chart of accoutns" but the "chart of depreicaiton" and the "controlling areas" of the above two company codes are different.
    The client wants to transfer the assets at net book value.
    In the above scenario (1) is it possible to transfer the assets.
    (2) shall we have identical depreciation areas in both COD's
    (3) what would be transaction variant should we use? and the its mapping the transaction types in "Define Transfer Variants" node?
    Moderator: Please, avoid asking basic questions

    Dear,
    Please check: Re: asset transfer within company code from one plant to another using STO
    Re: how to transfer  an asset from one plant to another plant within comp code
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-acct/asset-transfer-237416
    Regards,
    Syed Hussain.

  • Risks when locking Prod in SCC4, but not setting Company Code to productive

    Hi,
    I am trying to figure out the risks related to not setting Company Codes to productive... even though the Production system is locked in SCC4. Will the lock in SCC4 mitigate the risk of not setting Company Codes to productive?
    To my understanding, setting Company Codes to non-productive in the Production system would result in a risk for deleting financial data. I therefore wonder if defining the lock in SCC4 would compensate for this risk.
    Regards
    IT-auditor

    I asked myself the same question.
    The F1-help in SCC4 says the following:
    "This field should be maintained by the customer for documentary purposes."
    But also:
    "- Production clients and SAP reference clients are protected from the client copy tools, including "Copy by Transport Request" (transaction SCC1).
    - There is corresponding protection from the automatic Customizing Distribution and other tools.
    - In a production client, customizing settings that can be maintained as "current settings" are excluded from a client lock or transport connection; this means current settings (e.g. exchange rates, posting periods) can always be maintained in a productive client without recording changes. Other clients usually require a transport request."
    So, i think that the client role option is more a documentation thing. But also disables some client copy and automatic transport functionality. In my opinion it should be "production" on a production system because if not there are several functions activated that shouldn´t be for security reasons. 
    That´s what i think. Maybe someone can correct me or give more information to this thread.
    regards
    Tobias

  • Creating Asset in one Company Code and transferring it into multiple ccodes

    Hi ,
    We want to create a asset in one company code and then want to transfer it to multiple company codes based on %.
    eg: Asset XYZ in Ccode 100 for $10000
      transferring it to multiple company codes 100  20%
                                                                  200  50%
                                                                  300 30%  
    At present we are using AS01 and then using ABT1N multiple times. Is there an alternative way for doing it.
    Best Regards,
    Venkatram

    You can also create a custom program which takes your excel file with all the new asset numbers in new company code and the partial amount and process t-code ABT1N in batch.. if your partial transfer list is huge. If you have few assets than manual approach is better.

  • Can not close company code in asset accounting for prior year in ECC 6.0

    Hi,
    I have problem with closing one company code in particular for 2007.  I have run through the basic steps, however when I run AJAB.  I am told to restart the posting run.  I restarted the asset posting run ASKB and depreciation rub AFAB.  Both finished without error.  Again AJAB gives me the same message afterwards.  I confirmed with my security team that I have access to close the company code.  I ran a trace on the AJAB transaction for company 7600 and received the following:
    All these errors repeated about 200 times.
    I_ANLN1 incremented to about 215.
    (This is about the same number of unposted assets I have on this company code, which i think might have something to do with this.)
    First error:
    CALL FUNCTION 'VANLA2_READ_RANGE_TRIGGER'
    Table V_ANLA_2
            SELECT * FROM V_ANLA_2
             WHERE BUKRS  = GD_ABRA-BUKRS
               AND ZUJHR  IN R_ZUJHR
               AND ANLN1  IN T_R_ANLN1
               AND ANLN2  IN T_R_ANLN2
               AND     ANEQS >  0                    This is what causes this step to fail
              AND DEAKT = '00000000'
             ORDER BY MANDT BUKRS ANLN1 ANLN2.
    2nd error
    CALL FUNCTION 'VANLA1_READ_RANGE_TRIGGER'
    Table : V_ANLA_1
            SELECT * FROM V_ANLA_1
             WHERE BUKRS  = GD_ABRA-BUKRS
               AND ZUJHR  IN R_ZUJHR
               AND ANLN1  IN T_R_ANLN1
               AND ANLN2  IN T_R_ANLN2
               AND AKTIV =  '00000000'
              AND ZUJHR <> '0000'                    This is what causes this step to fail
              AND ZUJHR <=  '2007'
    ORDER BY MANDT BUKRS ANLN1 ANLN2.
    3rd error
    CALL FUNCTION 'ANEP_READ_MULTIPLE_GJAHR_ALL'
    Table: ANEP
        SELECT *  FROM ANEP  INTO TABLE T_ANEP
          WHERE BUKRS  =  I_BUKRS
            AND ANLN1  =  I_ANLN1   This is what causes this step to fail  (000001000000) does not exist on table
            AND ANLN2  =  I_ANLN2
            AND AFABE  IN R_AFABE
            AND GJAHR  BETWEEN I_GJAHR AND I_BISGJAHR
                               ORDER BY PRIMARY KEY.
    4th error
    FUNCTION GET_NEXT_ANLV.
    My theory is this has something to do with unposted assets, however this has never been an issue with prior version of SAP and is only now emerging with our uprgade to ECC 6.0.
    Please help.
    Allen

    Hello,
    You will get a better response to this type of query in the forum ERP Financials - Asset Accounting.
    SAP ERP Financials  - Asset Accounting
    -Paul

  • Not able to post to asset for the company code 5101 in fiscal year 2011

    Hi,
    I have created a Purchase Requisition(PR) for Account Assignement Cat as A in ME51n. And assigned an Asset number.
    In ME57, with ref to the PR created, I created a PO.
    While trying to do goods receipt for the PO at MIGO_GR,am able to generate the Mat Doc number but there are no subsequent Accoutning Documents available.
    Similarly while performing invoice handling Tcode - MIRO, am getting error message as "You cannot post to asset in company code 5101 fiscal year 2011
    In PO, under Account Assignment Tab,Distribution is: Single Account Assignment and Under Delivery, GR Non Valuated is unticked.
    Your help will be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Nirmala

    Hi Nirmala
    There are 2 issues
    1. OME9: Account Assignment Category A - You hve ticked GR Non Valuated there
    Hence, accounting doc is not generated @ MIGO.. It is generated at MIRO....
    If you want accounting doc at MIGO, then untick the same in OME9... Also, you would need to untick the same in PO, if available for modification....If not available, then delete the Line item and create a new one
    2. It seems you have not opened FY 2011 for assets...
    Do AJAB to close 2010 and AJRW which would open 2011... You can open 2011 w/o closing 2010, provided 2009 is closed...
    Br, Ajay M

  • How to Delete all the Assets in a Company Code

    HI GURUS n EXPERTS,
    The asset module is configured in my system but we were not using it. Now my company want to use it. During the analysis, I found:
    The assets are created but for maximum assets Value is Zero. But there is some assets have some value.
    Now, When we try to delete these assets with AS06. We are able to delete the asset with zero values. But when we try to delete the assets which have some value, system gives a message:
    Deleting is not possible. The asset already has values.
    Is there any way to delete such type assets. Or can we use Reset Company Code Transaction - OABL.
    Please suggest. Early response will highly appreciated.
    DSC

    Hi,
    Transactions OABL for data deletion are very critical  transactions to use. Please read carefully the IMG documentation.     
    For a start the reset of a company code is only allowed when in  "test status".
    I'm sorry per forum I an give you no recommendation to reset the cocd (OABL) and Reset Posted Depreciation (OAGL)   
    The impact have to be check on the spot.
    regards Bernhard

  • PO vendor not in company code

    Hi,
    We have two company code in SAP, these two company codes share the same purchasing org. For one vendor exist in company code:A, not exist in company code:B, it is still successful of using this vendor to create a PO of company code:B.
    It is stranger, is this a SAP standard behaviour? Any customizing to stop this?
    Thanks

    Yes, because at the time of PO creation, it just checks the purchasing organization data in vendor master.
    In your case, same purchsing organization is responsible for both the company code, so PO creation allows for both company code
    If you want to restrict the PO creaion for other Company code then create a seperate Purchasing Organization for other company code.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

Maybe you are looking for