Asset 50000 1 not in company code 1000

Hello Friends,
I'm able to create the assets, but afer creation of assets, when i'm going to see in display/Change mode system prompting the following message.
Asset 50000 1 not in company code 1000
Message no. AA001
Diagnosis
The asset number 50000 1 you entered, does not exist in company code 1000.
System Response
Processing cannot be continued.
Procedure
Correct your entry.
It is also possible that this asset is defined as a group asset. In that case, it cannot be used as an asset.
I'm able to see the asset when i press F4 button, but why system prompting this message i don't have clue.
Please help me on this.
Rgds
Swapna Murali

Hi Ravi,
Controlling area and Company code details are proper. I have to check the SAP Notes which you have provided. What are the conditions to receive this message?
I have created many assets before in the same company. Yesterday when i was using transaction AS03 to see one asset, system displayed the error message that particular asset was locked by me eventhough I was not doing anything with that Asset. So I used transaction SM12 to delete the lock entries. Later on I checked the transaction AS03 to see the asset, strangely system displaying the error message that particular asset is not availble in the Company code. I have created another asset aswell for testing, the same error message is continuing for this asset also. System is not displaying any error messagewhile creating the asset and displaying error message while display and change mode.
Please advice me.
Rgds
Swapna

Similar Messages

  • Error Asset 0 not in company code during creation of service puchase order

    Dear All,
    I am getting the following error while creating service order in ME21N. My account assignment category "P" and Item category "D".
                       The error message is "Asset 0 not in company code"
    Kindly give your suggestions to solve this problem.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Manivel.S

    HI,
    as per me if you are using P then you have to give WBS element in PO
    P nothing but direct consumption for project stock
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Asset not in company code

    Dear all
    I am entering a purchase order referncing from requisition, its standard purchase order  while procesing it  system is giving an error  "Asset 0 not in company code"
    Thanks
    Rashid

    If you are not wanting to make an assets purchase order, you will have to remove the account assignment category "A" from the line item of the purchase order.
    If you have entered any account assignment category then you might notice a new tab in the item detail where it asks you for the asset number.
    Regards,
    Jijo

  • No postings can be made to profit center A in company code 1000

    Hello SAP Gurus,
    Our profit center A was assigned only to company code 2000 but not in company code 1000 in KE53. However, when we checked some postings from FY14, we found out that there was a posting in company code 1000 for profit center A (Note: Cost Center A was assigned to Profit Center A in cost center master). Now, when we try to edit and post a parked document from company code 1000 with cost center A, error prompted "No postings can be made to profit center A in company code 1000".
    We had checked the change logs for company code assignment of profit center A but we haven't found any changes related to this.
    Appreciate if someone can advise how this is possible. Why did the posting go thru even if profit center is not assigned to company code? Why does the error suddenly prompted when we try to edit/post a parked document.
    Thank you!
    Jack

    Hi Jack,
    From the above note, it looks like following is the reason  why the first document in FY14 got posted:
    In  message Customizing, message KI113 was set as warning, status or information
    message or it was deactivated.
    So,  now if you want to post another document,  either you will have to create profit centre A in cocode 1000 or check the relevent message in customizing and change its status from Error to warning,status or information message.   the message number will be mentioned in your error message.
    If you want to keep using profit centre A in cocode 1000,  I think it is best to create the profit centre in cocode 1000 rather than playing with the messages.
    Regards,
    Sadhana.

  • The CO account assignment object belongs to company code 1000, not 1100

    Dear consultants,
    I am SAP - HR consultant.
    I have 4 company codes, under one controlling area & payroll area. I executed live Payroll & tried to run posting payroll results. System displayed folloewing error "You want to make a posting in company code 1100. At the same time, a CO account assignment object was specified that is assigned to company code 1000. This is account assignment object with object type CTR, and object key 1000/1010101400. "
    I have created similar accounts 1110101400, 1210101400 & 1310101400 for company codes 1100, 1200 & 1300.
    May I know what could be the reason?
    Regards,
    Bindumadhav

    "this is account assignment object with object type CTR, and object key 1000/1010101400" means; somethings is missing for cost center 1010101400 under the company code 1000. system tries to post and entry for company code 1100 to the cost center 1010101400 which falls under a different company code (1000).
    so it is not realted with GL accounts i believe
    you can go to KS02 and check the company code for the CCenter 1010101400 and change it to 1100.
    or you may change the cost center assigned to employer master and give a new ccenter which is under the company code 1100.
    but if i were you, before making any changes i would consult the a CO consultants first for this issue.

  • Error in ASKB "Asset 1-177 0 not in company code LX01'

    Hi Experts,
    Until Jan. 2009, only 1 depreciation area is activated for company code LX01 (01). For some assets, we had retirements/write-up postings. Came Feb. 2009, dep.area 10 was activated.
    With 2009 year-end closing AJAB, the process found an error ' Transactions not periodically posted'. This error upon analysing was due to those assets posted with retirements/write-ups (Jan. 09) and mentioned that ASKB needs to be executed for these assets for deparea 10. It's logical that there are no postings on these new accounts for January and the system should not ask them. For example there also are no depreciation postings in area 10 for January and this does not generate any problem. Then, why in ERP, the ASKB for deparea 10 is needed for those related assets?
    Also, I tried to process ASKB for deparea 10 to complete, but another error prompted: Message AA001 'Asset 1-177 0 not in company code LX01'. With this error message, I changed the 'Deactivation on' field in the masterdata and tried to rerun ASKB, but still this error exists. Would you know why or how this error could be eliminated?
    Kindly help.
    Thanks in advance.
    jandaph

    Hi,
    According to the error message, it seems like The asset does not exist in your company code.
    Please check again.
    Thanks,
    Srinu

  • Cost center belongs to company code 1000, not 2000

    Hi,
       When i am entering cost center in sales order, I am getting  an error "Cost center belongs to company code 1000, not 2000"
    Does anyone know which transaction i can use to extend this cost center to a different company code?

    I think you are creating sales rder for plant 1000. While the cost center you are providing is attched to plant 2000. Either you can change the cost center for plant 1000 or you can change the customiztion so that cost center is attached to plant 1000.

  • Partial Asset data transfer at company code level

    Hi all,
    We are planning to go live on december 1st, 2007. My client wants to hold a portion of fixed assets relating on one company code and want to convert them after couple of months.
    I think I will go with the current conversions and leave the division for which they want to hold, and to keep the company code in test mode. Planning to use the same conversion program designed for that particular division after go-live.
    And the GL balances for that particular division will be in non-recon account to ensure that there will not be any inconsistency between GL-FI
    Before second load after making correct entries, to convert the non recon account to recon and
    Please advice me, about this situation any impacts.
    Thanks
    Krishna

    Never mind. We managed somehow to figure it out ourselves.

  • Company code 1000's witholding tax reference number is missing

    Hello All,
    We are running the report RFIDYYWT / t.code S_P00_07000134 for the first time to file tax returns in the US.
    And we see the following errors;
    27    Company code 1000's witholding tax reference number is missing
    28    EDI identifier for company code 1000 is missing
    I did check the Additional Data for our US company code on OBY6 but there are no fields as such for Withholding Tax Reference and EDI Identifier.
    Also checked the Output Group US1 config under Withholding Tax. Not sure about Parameter Types "Tax Ref. 1" and "EDI Ref." fields.
    I see different threads with similar issues but could not find a solution for this specific problem. Could someone help us fix this problem so we can file this year's returns on time ? This is turning out to be a critical issue for our Finance team ...
    Thanks

    Found it - for US company Code, I went into the additional data of OBY6 and scrolled to the "Next Page". The namTax number USA (TIN) can be discovered, in the hidden pages of SAP

  • Asset, internal order and company code problem (AA982)

    HI
    Is it possibly on fixed asset that belongs to company code 1 to assign internal order (actual) for depreciation, that belongs to company code 2. We receive error (AA982); Company code for order is not company code for asset.
    SAP note 431367 says no.
    Eny proposals.
    Thank you for help.

    hi
    you should not assign the same company code.

  • Extended Withholding Tax in Country DE, Company Code 1000 in ECC 5 IDES

    hi all
    can we configure extended withholding tax for the company code 1000 in ECC5 IDES. even after making the whole configuration, while maintaining vendor master code an error message is coming.
    message: Entry DE  15 does not exist in T059Z - check your entry
    Message no. 00058
    15 is Tax Code
    i am getting some values in the customisation help hit like "Financial Accounting Basic Settings (New)" but it is not available in the IMG MENU. is it not availbale in IDES.
    it is very urgent and i am stuck up. pls provide some inputs
    regards,
    ashok

    Please, check in the IMG that you have correctly defined the table
    T059Z:
    Financial Accounting -> Financial Accounting Global Settings ->
        Withholding Tax -> Extended Withholding Tax -> Calculation ->
        Withholding Tax Codes -> Define withholding tax codes
    Please, also check the customizing of the vendor's Account Group
    and set the field Tax category as optional:
    Trans. OBD3 -> Select account group -> Company Code Data ->
        W/holding tax data, w/h tax 2 -> Withholding tax category
    Regards
    Siva

  • No posting cannot be made in profit center 3000 in company code 1000

    Hi All,
    we are facing small issue in profit center accounting, below i will explain the scnario.
    we have 2 existng company code like 1000 and 2000 with once controlling area, now we rollout another company code 3000 recently, for each compnay code we have different and saperate profit centers and profit center group, with same controlling area,
    In new company code 3000 we created one profit center like product 1,
    In existing company code like 1000 and 2000 when we are doing MIRO and derepication AFAB system giving error like
    No posting can be made to profit center Product 1 in company code 1000 for MIRO
    No posting can be made to profit center Produtct 1 in company code 2000 for AFAB.
    but this profit center is created for 3000 company code. why system is picking product 1 profit center for existing company code.
    can any one helpout for the issue.
    thank & regards
    kiran

    Hi,
    Trace the transactions of the Depreciation to the asset to the cost center to the respective profit center. And, also for the MIRO, trace the material master to the respective profit center.
    I guess, the profit center must be traced to your new profit center 'product 1'
    Kindly check and revert.
    Regards,
    Gangu.

  • PO creation-ME21n-Why SAP does not check company code and Plant relation

    Hi All,
    Does someone know, why SAP does not check Plant and company code relation at the time of PO creation or how can we put validation between plant and company code at the time of PO creation.
    <b>Example:</b> Suppose i have a company 0001 which is assinged to Plant 0001. when i am creating a PO with another company code 0002(Entering at header level-Org, data) and using Plant 0001 at line item level. SAP does not do this validation.
    How can we put this check in place?
    Thanks in advance.
    Deepak

    Hello Deepak,
    There are three types of purchasing
    - Company code specific :You need to assign company code to Pur organization
    - Plant specific : You must assign plant to pur organization
    - Cross company purchasing: No assignment between company code and pur organization.
    In the case 3, the system will not check company code and plant relationship, but it will check plant and pur organization specific.
    The following is the copy of sap help text:
    You can assign a purchasing organization to one company code. This is company-specific purchasing.
    You can assign a purchasing organization to no company code. This purchasing organization can then procure for all plants assigned to it, irrespective of the company code to which the plant belongs.
    Since each plant must be assigned to a company code, the company code can be determined via the plant in each procurement transaction, even if the procuring purchasing organization is not assigned to a company code.
    A purchasing organization must be assigned to one or more plants. This is plant-specific purchasing.
    Now, check your company-code and purchase organization assignment.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards
    Arif Mansuri

  • Error in testing an idoc -Trans. XK01 : CoCde not entered; company code are

    Hi
    I am getting the following error when i am trying to test a idoc thru we 19.
    The message type is CREMAS and it is an inbound idoc ,I am testing the function module
    idoc_input_creditor .
    Trans. XK01 : CoCde not entered; company code area not being edited
    I have entered   the company code in E1LFBWM segment  but still getting the same error .
    Can some one advise how this error can be solved
    Thanks in advance
    Anjali

    Hi ,
    Have you entered Company code value in all the required segments ? Like E1LFB1M , E2LFB5M..
    Regards,
    Deepthi

  • Risks when locking Prod in SCC4, but not setting Company Code to productive

    Hi,
    I am trying to figure out the risks related to not setting Company Codes to productive... even though the Production system is locked in SCC4. Will the lock in SCC4 mitigate the risk of not setting Company Codes to productive?
    To my understanding, setting Company Codes to non-productive in the Production system would result in a risk for deleting financial data. I therefore wonder if defining the lock in SCC4 would compensate for this risk.
    Regards
    IT-auditor

    I asked myself the same question.
    The F1-help in SCC4 says the following:
    "This field should be maintained by the customer for documentary purposes."
    But also:
    "- Production clients and SAP reference clients are protected from the client copy tools, including "Copy by Transport Request" (transaction SCC1).
    - There is corresponding protection from the automatic Customizing Distribution and other tools.
    - In a production client, customizing settings that can be maintained as "current settings" are excluded from a client lock or transport connection; this means current settings (e.g. exchange rates, posting periods) can always be maintained in a productive client without recording changes. Other clients usually require a transport request."
    So, i think that the client role option is more a documentation thing. But also disables some client copy and automatic transport functionality. In my opinion it should be "production" on a production system because if not there are several functions activated that shouldn´t be for security reasons. 
    That´s what i think. Maybe someone can correct me or give more information to this thread.
    regards
    Tobias

Maybe you are looking for

  • Import org.xml.sax is deprecated

    Hi All, Please help ... I am a beginner of using SAX with Java. I think I don't have the org.xml.sax.* classes in my java class. So, I downloaded "saxjava-1.0" from www.megginson.com (I hope I downloaded the correct one). I unzipped the file and put

  • Runtime Error on startup NSU

    Installed the NSU (nokia Software Updater) via the website. I'm running XP pro & office Pro P4 2ghz THE ERROR on startup of NSU Runtime error! Program:...Nokia software updater\nsu_ui_client.exe abnormal program termination. What the... is this!!???

  • Need to do switches configuration archive using the cisco works LMS 3.2

    Hi folks,         We have a cisco works LMS 3.2 bundle which contains Resource Manager Essentials 4.3.0 . I am trying to do config archive of all our network switches using RME. I have no idea how to do it . so i came here ... Guide me what are the t

  • Error trying to install MFP

    I have tried to download the latest Flashplayer as per the instructions . Each time I try the security warning does not come up and says that the player has installed. I have tried changing all security settings etc. I still cannot view any files tha

  • U110 BIOS bug?

    Dear colleagues! Just got my new U110, seen Vista to work well and trying to install Debian Linux (Lenny) in it. When booting to the Linux system, I see in the very beginning this message: PCI: BIOS Bug MCFG area at e0000000 is not E820-reserved. PCI