Async Traffic through and ASA

Hi Guys,
This is a little bit of an odd request however I need to allow a sync routing due to some legacy routing to pass through my ASA.
I have allowed IP any any between the particular hosts involved to allow for high ports etc..
However the ASA is tearing down the session as it never see's the ACK.
Hence is there a way to turn off the ip inspection or some other way to get this traffic through the firewall.
Thanks
Scott

On an iPad I don't believe that you can. If you made the iPad tunnel through your laptop or desktop computer is may be possible to specify what traffic you want sent through the VPN or otherwise. But I have a feeling that would be very complicated to setup and keep working well.

Similar Messages

Traffic Shaping and Priortization in ASA

Hi Everyone,
I read that traffic prioritixation is always applied outbound direction when traffic is trying to leave the ASA.
Also i read that traffic Shaping can be applied to all outgoing traffic on a interface.
need to know if traffic shaping and priortization means same thing in ASA ?
There direction is always outbound?
Regards
MAhesh

Hello Mahesh,
Not sure I get it but let me see if I can help,
Priority traffic: Basically allows you to split the interface into 2 different queues, one for low latency traffic and the other for best effor traffic. The one being on the Priority queue will always get served first.
Traffic Shapping:It's the buffering QoS techique that allows you to configure a limit of bandwith that you will provide to a certain traffic class, when you reach that limit the traffic that goes over the limit will be placed into a software queue, where it will be "holded". That's the different between traffic shapping and policing as whit traffic policing you will drop the offending traffic, with shapping you will hold it (so this is not good for Low latency traffic).
Now regarding the direction Traffic shapping can only be done on the outbound direction as queuing is an outbound process.
For Networking Posts check my blog at http://www.laguiadelnetworking.com/category/english/
Cheers,
Julio Carvajal Segura

NAC VPN and ASA

Hi
I have a customer who currently is using an ASA5520 as a firewall between his network and the Internet. He now wants remote VPN access with SecureID tokens for authentication added which is fine but he has also brought up NAC. Can I simply insert a NAC between the ASA and the internal network as in this Cisco document:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/ps6128/products_configuration_example09186a008074d641.shtml
That looks like it will work fine for VPN access but what about the outgoing Internet access for the current internal users will that be OK still or do I need to use a separate ASA for VPN access with NAC. Oh yes will I need an ACS as well or can the NAC talk directly to the SecureID appliance either using radius or RSA's own protocol ? Sorry if these are dumb questions but he dropped the NAC stuff on me at the last minute and I just need to know the basics quickly and can work out the details later.
Thanks
Pat

You can use a single ASA for internet access and NAC VPN.
If the Cisco NAC Server is Real IP, you can implement Policy Based Routing to route your VPN traffic through the Cisco NAC Server and normal internet traffic will bypass the Cisco NAC Server.
If the Cisco NAC Server is VGW or you do not want PBR, you can terminate your VPN traffic on a separate interface (two interfaces into internal nework). Once you have the VPN traffic routing this way, implement the Cisco NAC solution by putting the Cisco NAC Server inline with this interface.
Cisco NAC VPN SSO uses Radius accounting packets to authenticate VPN users. The ASA will interface with the Token server. Once authenticated, the ASA will send a Radius accounting packet to the Cisco NAC Server.
VGW Example
NAC Appliance (Cisco Clean Access) In-Band Virtual Gateway for Remote Access VPN Configuration Example
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6128/products_configuration_example09186a008074d641.shtml
Real IP example
Integrating with Cisco VPN Concentrators
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/nac/appliance/configuration_guide/416/CAS/s_vpncon.html
Regards,
Dan Laden

SSM40 and ASA Config

Hello,
I put an SSM40 into production in our ASA last week in promiscuous mode initially to determine what the device is seeing inbound through the ASA. So far, it isn't reporting anything which I suspect isn't correct. This is what I have for a config on the ASA and it appears that packets are making it to the module. Is this correct?
ASA Config to divert traffic to the IPS
access-list IPS permit ip any any
class-map PPI-IPS-CLASS
match access-list IPS
policy-map PPI-IPS-POLICY
class PPI-IPS-CLASS
ips promiscuous fail-open
service-policy PPI-IPS-POLICY interface inside
service-policy PPI-IPS-POLICY interface outside
sho service-policy
Global policy:
Service-policy: global_policy
   Interface Inside:
Service-policy: PPI-IPS-POLICY
    Class-map: PPI-IPS-CLASS
      IPS: card status Up, mode promiscuous fail-open
        packet input 0, packet output 18253556, drop 0, reset-drop 0
Interface Outside:
Service-policy: PPI-IPS-POLICY
    Class-map: PPI-IPS-CLASS
      IPS: card status Up, mode promiscuous fail-open
        packet input 0, packet output 2202573, drop 0, reset-drop 0
The only event the IPS is reporting is the following:
time: Apr 22, 2013 12:45:01 UTC offset=-300 timeZone=CDT
errorMessage: No installable auto update package found on server name=errSystemError time: Apr 22, 2013 12:45:01 UTC offset=-300 timeZone=CDT
errorMessage: No installable auto update package found on server name=errSystemError
So, what have I configured incorrectly, or is this just normal for promiscuous mode?

It looks correct.
You can try enabling the ICMP Echo Request signature and watch it fire on pings to test your setup.
You'll need to add ICMP to your IPS access-list.
- Bob
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/security/ips/7.0/configuration/guide/cli/cli_ssm.html#wp1046877

Slowness problem sending traffic through CX module

People in the remote site access a SharePoint site via HTTP with Internet Explorer and open Microsoft documents. When I configure the ASA to send HTTP traffic through the CX module it slows opening documents to a crawl (Over 5 minutes to open) but everything else works fine. When I don’t send traffic through the CX module the documents open quickly (seconds) with no issue. So what I need to do is HTTP traffic going to and from the remote site needs to bypass the CX module or set it up so only HTTP traffic coming from the main site and site A going only to the internet goes through the CX module. How can I set this up to accomplish this?
I have attached a topology diagram.

That is what I needed help with but here is what I was thinking.
! Create needed groups
object-group network CX-BYPASS-SITE2SITE
net 192.168.170.0 255.255.255.0
! from CX-BYPASS-SITE2SITE to ANY via HTTP - bypass
access-list CX_BYPASS deny tcp object-group CX-BYPASS-SITE2SITE any eq 80
! from any to CX-BYPASS-SITE2SITE via HTTP - bypass
access-list CX_BYPASS deny tcp any object-group CX-BYPASS-SITE2SITE eq 80
! CX inspects everything else
access-list CX_BYPASS permit ip any any
! Config traffic through the CX
class-map CX_REDIRECT
no match any
match access-list CX_BYPASS
policy-map global_policy
class CX_REDIRECT
cxsc fail-open
But I really only want to send HTTP traffic through the CX from the Main site and Site A to the internet, but this...
! CX inspects everything else
access-list CX_BYPASS permit ip any any
would send everything. How can I change that to just send HTTP traffic?
! CX inspects just HTTP traffic
access-list CX_BYPASS permit tcp any any eq 80
Would that would?
Mike

IPSec Pass Through on ASA

I have a third party firewall behind a Cisco ASA. The Cisco ASA is doing PAT as there are no other IP addresses available. The third party firewall is attempting to build an IPSec tunnel to another firewall. The IPSec tunnel is not coming up. When I do a capture on the Cisco ASA firewall I see traffic hit the inside interface and leave the outside interface. I then see the reply traffic return and hit the outside interface of my Cisco ASA but it is not being allowed to pass through to the inside interface.I have enabled NAT-T on the thrid party firewall but it still does not get the reply traffic becuase it gets stopped at the Cisco ASA.
Any thoughts?

Is your third party FW attached directly to your ASA? If not, do you have a route to that device on your ASA?
Please perform a packet-tracer to see why the return traffic is not reaching the third party FW..
packet-tracer input outside udp 500 500 detail
If the packet-tracer shows traffic going through successfully, perhaps it is your third party FW that is blocking the traffic?
Please reply with packet-tracer results.
Kind Regards,
Kevin
**Please remember to rate helpful posts as well as mark the question as 'answered' once your issue is resolved. This will help others to find your solution faster.

Configuring QoS for FIOS Router MI-424WR: Traffic Priority and Shaping

Please only read on if you are an experienced internet user familiar with setting the advanced QoS and Firewall settings for the MI-424WR and make use of wireless adaptors from a PC to provide connectivity.
This is my first post and my first week since I moved from Time Warner Cable over to FIOS for iNet (plus HDTV and phone).     While all my services work, the router as delivered and setup is not optimum for internet quality of service. Instead it was probably out of the box optimized for HDTV and telephone to satisfy most customers and reduce support overhead.   The average FIOS consumer is multimedia sensitive, but that is not so in my genre of internet consumer.   Here in lies the core of my reason for seeking help from like minded and experienced users in this community.
One of the main driving forces in my switching to FIOS was to improve my multiplayer gaming experience where ultra low ping latency and high upload data rates dramatically affect the quality of connection and thus gameplay.    The cable internet service from TimeWarner was providing solid 2MB/1MB down/up data rates with no issues like what Im having now with FIOS.   Again the reason for the switch was both financial and in hope of gaining better data rates and quality of service.   Now with FIOS Im getting about 24/15 down/up data rate on the Extreme FIOS 25/25 plan when measured from my house to Los Angeles server (50 miles away) via Speedtest.net or DslReports.com/tests.     Latency wise, the ping has gone down from 150 to 50ms when measured to my friends who I connect to online that are on the East coast.   The data rate and latency has greatly improved in going from Cable to FIOS.   So far, so good.
Where the problem shows up now, is that now I get an internet "hiccup" every 5-10 minutes that lasts about 1/2 to 2 seconds.   For the average internet user that just streams multimedia or cruises on the net; this is probably undetectable or noticed.   I never had this problem over the same PCs connected wirelessly to my DLINK DGL-4500 Gaming Router when my ISP was TimeWarner's cable service.    Now, using the FIOS and MI-424WR router with everythings being the same; Im experiencing this degregation in quality of service.    Even putting the PC's IP into the DMZ doesnt make any difference, so it is not related to port forwarding.    The issue is squarely in the lap of FIOS and this router as delivered and configured.    This is where the "game" is a foot, and where I need expertise in an area Im new to.
I am not new to being hands on with inet trouble shooting asI have been setting up my own home network (I work from home over VPN to work) for decades; I would like to leverage the skills of those who are experts in the area that I think can address this issue.   That being QoS and the other device class mechanisms of this router.   Its my guess that this periodic hiccup can be minimized and even eliminated using these advanced features of this all-in-one TV/iNet/Tele router.
With that context being laid down, this hiccup doesnt show up if:
a. I connect two PCs connected to the same ethernet hub of the MI-424WR (traffic just over the LAN and not WAN)
b. When I was on Cable with my own gaming router wirelessly DHCP connected to my PC and using port forwarding or using the DMZ.
The hiccup does exist when:
a.  Going from internet through the MI-424WR to the wireless DHCP connected PC with port forwarding
b. Even putting the wireless DHCP connected PC into the MI-424WR's DMZ has no effect
I did read the manual and tried some QoS pritority and shaping and managed to reduce how often the hiccup occured, but I was just making guesses at the settings.   I put in the IP for the PCs I use for my gaming applications (which are very ping and jitter sensitive) into the QoS priority (value 7) and shaping GUI.    Im hoping someone with experience can tell me exactly how to use it and what settings to input.   Im not clear on the device and connection types offered in the QoS menus.
Another thing, is I couldnt find settings for the turning on/off the ICMP echo.   But I assume this is on because it can be pinged by folks on the net to my WAN IP.
Here is the manual for the Verizon provided M424WR router (Current Version of firmware: 20.10.7)
download link
Here are the QoS traffic priority and shaping values Ive been experimenting with:
Click to view QoS Traffic Priority
Click to view QoS Traffic Shaping
And why it matters to have a solid and stable inet connection for internet gaming? The hiccup causes slewing or jitter which equates to positional errors in the 3D world that ruins the smooth gameplay that is needed for high end gaming.
Heres a snapshot of me flying the wing of another flight simmer who is on the East coast and me on the West coast.
Click to view
Thank you in advance.
Thomas "AV8R"
MSEE

TMAS wrote:
the router as delivered and setup is not optimum for internet quality of service. Instead it was probably out of the box optimized for HDTV and telephone to satisfy most customers and reduce support overhead.
That's not accurate. VZ telephone service does not go through the Actiontec. Also, there are no default settings for QOS in the Actiontec since QOS is rarely needed with FIOS upload speeds.
TMAS wrote:I get an internet "hiccup" every 5-10 minutes that lasts about 1/2 to 2 seconds.
   You should not be experiencing periodic "hiccups". Something is clearly amiss.
TMAS wrote:
With that context being laid down, this hiccup doesnt show up if:a. I connect two PCs connected to the same ethernet hub of the MI-424WR (traffic just over the LAN and not WAN)
The hiccup does exist when:
a.  Going from internet through the MI-424WR to the wireless DHCP connected PC with port forwarding
b. Even putting the wireless DHCP connected PC into the MI-424WR's DMZ has no effect
Lets see. The issue shows up on a wireless connection, but not a wired connection. You think this is a QOS issue and not a wireless issue why? Have you tried changing the wireless channel? It very possible you have neighbors on the same channel. Is the DGL-4500 wireless still on? Could that be interfering?TMAS wrote:
Another thing, is I couldnt find settings for the turning on/off the ICMP echo.
The settting to enable/disable ICMP echo is on the Firewall/Remote Administration page.
TMAS wrote:
Here are the QoS traffic priority and shaping values Ive been experimenting with:Click to view QoS Traffic Priority
Click to view QoS Traffic Shaping
The traffic proirity settings you linked are applied only to your wireless connections. QOS between the router and your wireless PC will only serve to prioritize traffic between the router and that PC and have no affect on your internet traffic. Assuming you are not running browsers, VOIP and other traffic from that PC while you're gaming, then that will not accomplish anything. i.e. You're giving your only traffic highest priority, but that traffic is not competing with anything (except other nearby wireless connections on the same channel).
On the traffic shaping screenshot, you have broadband ethernet checked, but according to your other thread, your WAN connection is Broadband Coax, not Broadband ethernet.

Forcing traffic through load balancer rather than zone to zone

I have several T5140s with 2 LDOMs. Within each LDOM I have multiple zones which contain 2 environments. Each environment comprises the following, an apache instance behind a BigIP load balancer, a JBoss instance, and several misc. The jboss zone has three IP address assigned for multiple applications. Each server is configured identically as far as zone and LDOM layout. We use mod_cluster to cluster our apache and Jboss environment. What I'm trying to accomplish is forcing the apache zone's traffic through the BigIP rather than zone to zone.
Referring to the information below, server2ldom1jboss is one jboss node which needs to connect to both server2ldom1japache and server1ldom1apache. server2ldom1jboss connects to server2ldom1apache via its DNS name which is a NAT address. So webserver2 resolves to 10.10.2.5 which NATs to 10.10.1.5 behind the BigIP. webserver2 responds directly to the jboss zone rather than through the BigIP. Not good. server1ldom1apache works correctly as it's not a local zone.
Referring to this document, https://blogs.oracle.com/solarium/resource/solaris-container-guide-en-v3.1.pdf
section 5.2.7.8
"Connection of zones via external routers using the shared IP instance"
I've created the following routes
route add 10.10.2.5 10.10.1.5
route add 10.10.0.34 10.10.1.5 -interface -reject
route add 10.10.0.35 10.10.1.5 -interface -reject
route add 10.10.0.87 10.10.1.5 -interface -reject
route add 10.10.1.5 10.10.0.87 -interface -reject
route add 10.10.1.5 10.10.0.34 -interface -reject
route add 10.10.1.5 10.10.0.35 -interface -reject
This does prevent the zone to zone traffic, but it also preventing any response. I've tried other options as well, but have not been successful yet. What concerns me is this "These interfaces must not be used elsewhere in the global zone." The 5140 has 4 ethernet ports, which are configured into two port channels. vnet0 and vnet1. The apache instances use vnet1. The remaining zones use vnet0, including the global zone (server2ldom1 10.10.0.21). I think this may be the issue, but do not see an easy resolution without breaking my port channels and losing redundancy and fail-over.
If there is anything I'm missing or a better/different way to do this, I would greatly appreciate any input on this matter.
Thank you.
webserver2 10.10.2.5 NATs to 10.10.1.5
jboss apps 10.10.0.34, 10.10.0.35, 10.10.0.87
10.10.0.0/24 is the lan
10.10.1.0/24 is the network behind the BigIP
10.10.2.0/24 is the webserver network (in front of the BigIP)
[1658]root@server2:~# ldm list-bindings
NAME STATE FLAGS CONS VCPU MEMORY UTIL UPTIME
primary active -n-cv- SP 4 2G 1.1% 138d 5h
MAC
00:14:4f:ec:20:ff
HOSTID
0x84ec20b8
VCPU
VID PID UTIL STRAND
0 0 2.0% 100%
1 1 1.4% 100%
2 2 0.7% 100%
3 3 2.1% 100%
MAU
ID CPUSET
0 (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7)
MEMORY
RA PA SIZE
0x8000000 0x8000000 2G
VARIABLES
boot-device=/pci@0/pci@0/pci@2/scsi@0/disk@0,0:a disk net
keyboard-layout=US-English
nvramrc=devalias rootdisk /pci@0/pci@0/pci@2/scsi@0/disk@0,0:a devalias rootmirror /pci@0/pci@0/pci@2/scsi@0/disk@1,0:a
security-mode=none
security-password=
use-nvramrc?=true
IO
DEVICE PSEUDONYM OPTIONS
pci@0 pci
niu@80 niu
VCC
NAME PORT-RANGE
primary-vcc0 5000-5010
CLIENT PORT
group1@primary-vcc0 5000
group1@primary-vcc0 5000
VSW
NAME MAC NET-DEV DEVICE DEFAULT-VLAN-ID PVID VID MODE
primary-vsw0 00:14:4f:f9:ff:ff aggr1 switch@0 1 1
PEER MAC PVID VID
vnet0@ldom2 00:14:4f:fb:7b:ff 1
vnet0@ldom1 00:14:4f:fb:1a:ff 1
NAME MAC NET-DEV DEVICE DEFAULT-VLAN-ID PVID VID MODE
primary-vsw1 00:14:4f:fb:8e:ff aggr2 switch@1 1 1
PEER MAC PVID VID
vnet1@ldom1 00:14:4f:f8:17:ff 1
vnet1@ldom2 00:14:4f:f8:c2:ff 1
VDS
NAME VOLUME OPTIONS MPGROUP DEVICE
primary-vds0 ldom2_swap /ldoms/swap/server2ldom2
ldom2_root /dev/dsk/c4t600601601CE1210018F9E37BD2AADD11d0s2
ldom1_swap /ldoms/swap/server2ldom1
ldom1_root /dev/dsk/c4t600601601CE121007E02166CD2AADD11d0s2
CLIENT VOLUME
ldom2_swap@ldom2 ldom2_swap
ldom2_root@ldom2 ldom2_root
ldom1_swap@ldom1 ldom1_swap
ldom1_root@ldom1 ldom1_root
VCONS
NAME SERVICE PORT
SP
NAME STATE FLAGS CONS VCPU MEMORY UTIL UPTIME
ldom1 active -n---- 5000 30 15G 3.7% 192d 6h
MAC
00:14:4f:f8:a5:ff
HOSTID
0x84f8a5f5
VCPU
VID PID UTIL STRAND
0 4 0.4% 100%
1 5 0.3% 100%
2 6 0.1% 100%
3 7 4.4% 100%
4 8 0.2% 100%
5 9 0.2% 100%
6 10 14% 100%
7 11 0.1% 100%
8 12 8.1% 100%
9 13 0.1% 100%
10 14 0.1% 100%
11 15 0.1% 100%
12 16 0.3% 100%
13 17 0.1% 100%
14 18 0.1% 100%
15 19 0.1% 100%
16 20 0.3% 100%
17 21 0.6% 100%
18 22 0.3% 100%
19 23 0.1% 100%
20 54 1.0% 100%
21 55 0.5% 100%
22 56 1.2% 100%
23 57 0.2% 100%
24 58 4.5% 100%
25 59 0.9% 100%
26 60 0.0% 100%
27 61 0.1% 100%
28 62 0.1% 100%
29 63 0.3% 100%
MAU
ID CPUSET
1 (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15)
2 (16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23)
6 (48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55)
7 (56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63)
MEMORY
RA PA SIZE
0x8000000 0x88000000 10G
0x401800000 0x6b1800000 5G
VARIABLES
auto-boot?=true
boot-device=ldom1_root:b
NETWORK
NAME SERVICE DEVICE MAC MODE PVID VID
vnet0 primary-vsw0@primary network@0 00:14:4f:fb:1a:ff 1
PEER MAC MODE PVID VID
primary-vsw0@primary 00:14:4f:f9:ff:ff 1
vnet0@ldom2 00:14:4f:fb:7b:ff 1
NAME SERVICE DEVICE MAC MODE PVID VID
vnet1 primary-vsw1@primary network@1 00:14:4f:f8:17:ff 1
PEER MAC MODE PVID VID
primary-vsw1@primary 00:14:4f:fb:8e:ff 1
vnet1@ldom2 00:14:4f:f8:c2:ff 1
DISK
NAME VOLUME TOUT DEVICE SERVER MPGROUP
ldom1_swap ldom1_swap@primary-vds0 disk@0 primary
ldom1_root ldom1_root@primary-vds0 disk@1 primary
VCONS
NAME SERVICE PORT
group1 primary-vcc0@primary 5000
NAME STATE FLAGS CONS VCPU MEMORY UTIL UPTIME
ldom2 active -n---- 5000 30 15000M 0.8% 192d 6h
MAC
00:14:4f:fa:e8:ff
HOSTID
0x84fae839
VCPU
VID PID UTIL STRAND
0 24 1.0% 100%
1 25 1.0% 100%
2 26 0.0% 100%
3 27 0.0% 100%
4 28 0.1% 100%
5 29 0.3% 100%
6 30 0.0% 100%
7 31 0.0% 100%
8 32 0.0% 100%
9 33 0.1% 100%
10 34 1.3% 100%
11 35 0.0% 100%
12 36 0.1% 100%
13 37 1.0% 100%
14 38 1.9% 100%
15 39 0.0% 100%
16 40 0.0% 100%
17 41 0.0% 100%
18 42 0.1% 100%
19 43 0.5% 100%
20 44 0.2% 100%
21 45 0.0% 100%
22 46 0.2% 100%
23 47 0.4% 100%
24 48 0.2% 100%
25 49 0.0% 100%
26 50 0.0% 100%
27 51 0.0% 100%
28 52 0.0% 100%
29 53 0.0% 100%
MAU
ID CPUSET
3 (24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31)
4 (32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39)
5 (40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47)
MEMORY
RA PA SIZE
0x8000000 0x308000000 15000M
VARIABLES
auto-boot?=true
boot-device=/virtual-devices@100/channel-devices@200/disk@1:b ldom2_root
keyboard-layout=US-English
NETWORK
NAME SERVICE DEVICE MAC MODE PVID VID
vnet0 primary-vsw0@primary network@0 00:14:4f:fb:7b:ff 1
PEER MAC MODE PVID VID
primary-vsw0@primary 00:14:4f:f9:ff:ff 1
vnet0@ldom1 00:14:4f:fb:1a:ff 1
NAME SERVICE DEVICE MAC MODE PVID VID
vnet1 primary-vsw1@primary network@1 00:14:4f:f8:c2:ff 1
PEER MAC MODE PVID VID
primary-vsw1@primary 00:14:4f:fb:8e:ff 1
vnet1@ldom1 00:14:4f:f8:17:ff 1
DISK
NAME VOLUME TOUT DEVICE SERVER MPGROUP
ldom2_swap ldom2_swap@primary-vds0 disk@0 primary
ldom2_root ldom2_root@primary-vds0 disk@1 primary
VCONS
NAME SERVICE PORT
group1 primary-vcc0@primary 5000
[1657]root@server2ldom1:~# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
lo0:1: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
zone server2ldom1z3
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
lo0:2: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
zone server2ldom1z2
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
lo0:3: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
zone server2ldom1z6
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
lo0:4: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
zone server2ldom1jboss
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
lo0:5: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
zone server2ldom1apache
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
lo0:6: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
zone server2ldom1z1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
vnet0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
inet 10.10.0.21 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.10.0.255
ether 0:14:4f:fb:1a:ff
vnet0:1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
zone server2ldom1z2
inet 10.10.0.33 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.10.0.255
vnet0:2: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
zone server2ldom1z6
inet 10.10.0.36 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.10.0.255
vnet0:3: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
zone server2ldom1jboss
inet 10.10.0.34 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.10.0.255
vnet0:4: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
zone server2ldom1jboss
inet 10.10.0.35 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.10.0.255
vnet0:5: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
zone server2ldom1z1
inet 10.10.0.32 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.10.0.255
vnet0:6: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
zone server2ldom1z1
inet 10.10.0.74 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.10.0.255
vnet0:7: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
zone server2ldom1jboss
inet 10.10.0.87 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.10.0.255
vnet1: flags=1000842<BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3
inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0
ether 0:14:4f:f8:17:ff
vnet1:1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3
zone server2ldom1z3
inet 10.10.1.101 netmask fffffc00 broadcast 10.10.47.255
vnet1:2: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3
zone server2ldom1apache
inet 10.10.1.5 netmask fffffc00 broadcast 10.10.47.255
[1701]root@server2ldom1:~# zonecfg -z server2ldom1jboss info
zonename: server2ldom1jboss
zonepath: /zones/server2ldom1jboss
brand: native
autoboot: true
bootargs:
pool:
limitpriv:
scheduling-class:
ip-type: shared
inherit-pkg-dir:
dir: /lib
inherit-pkg-dir:
dir: /platform
inherit-pkg-dir:
dir: /sbin
inherit-pkg-dir:
dir: /usr
inherit-pkg-dir:
dir: /opt/sfw
inherit-pkg-dir:
dir: /opt/
net:
address: 10.10.0.34
physical: vnet0
defrouter: 10.10.0.1
net:
address: 10.10.0.35
physical: vnet0
defrouter: 10.10.0.1
net:
address: 10.10.0.87
physical: vnet0
defrouter: 10.10.0.1
attr:
name: comment
type: string
value: server2ldom1jboss
[1702]root@server2ldom1:~# zonecfg -z server2ldom1apache info
zonename: server2ldom1apache
zonepath: /zones/server2ldom1apache
brand: native
autoboot: true
bootargs:
pool:
limitpriv:
scheduling-class:
ip-type: shared
inherit-pkg-dir:
dir: /lib
inherit-pkg-dir:
dir: /platform
inherit-pkg-dir:
dir: /sbin
inherit-pkg-dir:
dir: /usr
inherit-pkg-dir:
dir: /opt/sfw
inherit-pkg-dir:
dir: /opt/
net:
address: 10.10.1.5/22
physical: vnet1
defrouter not specified
attr:
name: comment
type: string
value: server2ldom1apache
Edited by: coreyva on Feb 18, 2012 11:36 AM

After further research, I think the best course of action will be to create a VLAN for the zone behind the BigIP and then create the corresponding interface in the vlan and zone. Using this links as my references in case anyone is interested. I'll post what I come up with.
https://blogs.oracle.com/stw/entry/using_ip_instances_with_vlans
https://blogs.oracle.com/stw/entry/solaris_zones_and_networking_common
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/816-4554/816-4554.pdf # AdministeringVirtualLocalAreaNetworks
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19053-01/ldoms.mgr11/820-4913-10/820-4913-10.pdf # Assign VLANs to a Virtual Switch and Virtual
Network Device

Policy based routing on VRF interfaces to route traffic through TE Tunnel

Hi All,
Is there a method to do policy based routing on VRF interfaces and route data traffic through one TE tunnel and non-data traffic through another TE tunnel.
The tunnel is already build up with these below config
interface Tunnel25
ip unnumbered Loopback0
tunnel destination 10.250.16.250
tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 10 explicit name test
ip explicit-path name test enable
next-address x.x.x.x
next-address y.y.y.y
router ospf 1
mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0
mpls traffic-eng area 0
mpls traffic-eng tunnels
nterface GigabitEthernet5/2
mpls traffic-eng tunnels
mpls ip
Is there additional config needed to work ,also in the destination end for the return traffic,we want to use the normal PATH --I mean non TE tunnel.
We tested with the above scenario,but couldn't able to reach the destination.Meantime we had a question,when the packet uses the policy map while ingress,it may not know the associatuion with VRF(Is that right? --If so ,how to make it happen)
Any help would be really appreciated
Thanks
Regards
Anantha Subramanian Natarajan

hi Anantha!
I might not be the right person to comment on your first question. I have not configured MVPNs yet and not very confertable with the topic.
But I am sure that if you read through the CBTS doc thoroughly, you might be able to derive the answer yourself. One thing I notice is that " a Tunnel will be selected regularly according to the routing process (even isf it is cbts enabled). From the tunnels selected using the regular best path selection, the traffic is mapped to a perticular tunnel in the group if specific class is mapped to that tunnel.
So a master tunnel can be the only tunnel between the 2 devices over which the routing (bgp next hops) are exchanged and all other tunnels can be members of this tunnel. So your RPF might not fail.
You might have to explore on this a bit more and read about the co-existance of multicast and TE. This will be the same as that.
For your second question, the answer would be easy :
If you want a specific eompls cust to take a particular tunnel/path, just create a seperate pair of loopbacks on the PEs. Make the loopback learnt on the remote PE through the tunnel/path that you want the eompls to take. Then establish the xconnect with this loopback. I am assuming that your question is that a particular eompls session should take a particular path.
If you meant that certain traffic from the same eompls session take a different path/tunnel, then CBTS will work.
Regards,
Niranjan

QoS Traffic shaping and peak shaping

Hi,
Could somebody tell me what is the difference between traffic shaping and peak shaping?
Kind Regards.

Standard traffic shaping (the shape average command) will keep the average rate of the traffic to the limit you specify, which should be the committed rate of your circuit.
Peak shaping will also do traffic shaping (using queues, etc), guaranteeing a minimum rate, but will allow traffic to levels to burst above your configured (committed) rate.
From the documentation:
Traffic shaping limits the rate of transmission of data. In addition to using a specifically configured transmission rate, you can use Generic Traffic Shaping (GTS) to specify a derived transmission rate based on the level of congestion.
You can specify two types of traffic shaping; average rate shaping and peak rate shaping. Average rate shaping limits the transmission rate to the CIR. Using the CIR ensures that the average amount of traffic being sent conforms to the rate expected by the network.
Peak rate shaping configures the router to send more traffic than the CIR. To determine the peak rate, the router uses the following formula:
peak rate = CIR(1 + Be / Bc)
where:
â¢Be is the Excess Burst size.
â¢Bc is the Committed Burst size.
Peak rate shaping allows the router to burst higher than average rate shaping. However, using peak rate shaping, the traffic sent above the CIR (the delta) could be dropped if the network becomes congested.
If your network has additional bandwidth available (over the provisioned CIR) and the application or class can tolerate occasional packet loss, that extra bandwidth can be exploited through the use of peak rate shaping. However, there may be occasional packet drops when network congestion occurs. If the traffic being sent to the network must strictly conform to the configured network provisioned CIR, then you should use average traffic shaping.
Examples
The following example sets the uses average rate shaping to ensure a bandwidth of 256 kbps:
shape average 256000
The following example uses peak rate shaping to ensure a bandwidth of 300 kbps but allow throughput up to 512 kbps if enough bandwidth is available on the interface:
bandwidth 300
shape peak 512000

RVL200 IPSEC: Channel all or some data traffic through tunnel, possible?

Is it at all possible to channel all/some data traffic through an established ipsec tunneled connection using the RVL200?
I have successfully established an ipsec connection through RVL200 and RV042 routers and are able to connect to servers/computers behind it.
Now I want to channel all or some traffic through the ipsec-tunnel for computers that reside on 192.168.1.0 subnet of RVL200 network.
Main office - RV042 router - 10.200.62.1
Remote office - RVL200 router - 192.168.1.1
I am trying to use the Advanced Routing option to add static routes but I am not 100% sure if I am configuring the routes correctly.
To give an example of routing DNS requests for HOTMAIL.COM [65.55.72.183]:
Destination IP - 65.55.0.0
SM - 255.255.0.0
GW - 10.200.62.1
Hop - 1
Interface - LAN
For some reason this does not appear to work. I have also tried using the interface setting of WAN and tested - this also does not work.
Can this be done? If anyone has tried doing this I would be very interested in finding out how to configure this.
Cheers.
MP

For some reason the DNS IP settings does not seem to work.
I started looking at the option of using the Quick VPN client which appears to have a setting for enabling Remote DNS.
I have setup a test user on both the RV042 and RVL200 to test if I can overcome the Split DNS limitation. But for some reason I can't connect to either of the two routers. I have installed the client on a 64bit Windows 7 client machine which has the Windows Firewall service enabled.
I keep getting the below error, there is no conflict with the IP address scheme and the password is correct.
Could it be this new client does not support the older Linksys badged RV0xx routers? Because Split DNS is only supported on v3 hardware. The firmware on my RVL200 is v1.1.12 .1.
What should I check to enable connectivity using this client? Or is because it does not support 64bit WIndows 7? I have even exported the certificates for both Admin and User into the C:\Program Files (x86)\Cisco Small Business\QuickVPN Client folder.

Problem Packet Flow through Cisco ASA Firewall

I have a Cisco ASA 5540 8.2(1), with permit ip any any rules
packet-tracer input inside tcp 10.56.149.129 871 10.40.170.10 3003
show
Phase: 1
Type: FLOW-LOOKUP
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
Found flow with id 1374599592, using existing flow
Result:
input-interface: inside
input-status: up
input-line-status: up
Action: drop
Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
if you change the source or destination port, the packet is successfully
clear conn did not help
please tell me how to solve the problem?

Hi,
I would suggest sharing the firewall configuration (except for any sensitive information they might have) so troubleshooting this would be easier.
It would seem to me that during your "packet-tracer" test there is already an existing traffic flow through the ASA with the same information that you entered in the command.
I don't know however why the connection would be blocked according to the "packet-tracer". In my own test this seemed to work. Output was otherwise the same but the "connection" wasnt dropped.
- Jouni

Tunnelling web traffic through ssh

for tunnelling web traffic through ssh, it says here
http://wiki.freaks-unidos.net/weblog...fox-ssh-tunnel
that i have to set only the SOCKS Host text field in the edit>preferences>advanced>network>connection>settings
to localhost and the port i used for ssh but what about the other fields like http,ftp,gopher,and ssl proxy, shouldn't i need to set those too? if not why and what are those fields for anyway?
btw, is it possible to view streaming video like youtube.com while using a proxy? if so, then how would i go about it?

jordi wrote:
ssh -D 4444 (or any other port number) youruser@yourserver
see the manual:
-D [bind_address:] port
Specifies a local ''dynamic'' application-level port forwarding. This works by
allocating a socket to listen to port on the local side, optionally bound to
the specified bind_address. Whenever a connection is made to this port, the
connection is forwarded over the secure channel, and the application protocol
is then used to determine where to connect to from the remote machine. Cur‐
rently the SOCKS4 and SOCKS5 protocols are supported, and ssh will act as a
SOCKS server. Only root can forward privileged ports. Dynamic port forward‐
ings can also be specified in the configuration file.
streaming videos like youtube.com will be possible... surfing the web will be the same as without socks proxy...
I suggest to use a addon like FoxyProxy if you use socks proxy's a lot.
1) I already know the ssh part, im talking about the configuration in firefox, sorry if i didn't make this clear.
for tunnelling web traffic through ssh, it says here
http://wiki.freaks-unidos.net/weblog...fox-ssh-tunnel
that i have to set only the SOCKS Host text field in the edit>preferences>advanced>network>connection>settings
to localhost and the port i used for ssh but what about the other fields like http,ftp,gopher,and ssl proxy, shouldn't i need to set those too? if not why and what are those fields for anyway?
2) and another thing about streaming videos, why is it that some proxies i have used before don't allow streaming traffic through?
ok it says here for vpn
http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/sDefi...213324,00.html#
An additional level of security involves encrypting not only the data, but also the originating and receiving network addresses.
3) so how would the routers know where to route the data if its encrypted? and how would i go about implementing that?
4) btw, is ssh tunnelling an implementation of vpn?
5) another question i have would be that for ssh tunnelling, it works at the transport layer onwards so only applications which are designed to use the port would go through the tunnel and be encrypted right, other apps would not go through the tunnel. On the contrary, IPsec works on the network layer so all information above the network layer whether they use UDP or TCP or whatever ports for TCP would go through the tunnel and be encrypted. Are the above statements correct?
Last edited by unregistered (2008-05-11 08:39:19)

Unable to establish OSPFv3 neighbors through transparent ASA

I have 2 devices running IPv6 with an ASA ver 8.4(2) in transparent mode with multiple contexts in between them. I can ipv6 ping the devices through the ASA but can not get the 2 devices to establish OSPFv3 adjacency. They are able to establish adjacency with ipv4 OSPF. When running debug ipv6 ospf hello I see each of the devices sending hellos but not receiving them from the device on the other side of the ASA. I notice that the hellos are coming from the link local addresses and not the unique global addresses that I applied to the interfaces. If I connect a device directly to one of the devices I can establish OSPFv3 adjacency without a problem.
Any thoughts?
Bob

Bob,
It is expected that OSPF/EIGRP etc use link local rather than unique global ;-)
Regarding the problem.
- please enable
logging buffered infologging buffer-size 1000000
- and ASP drop capure.
cap ASP type asp all
Try establishing the adjacency and check
show logg sh cap ASP
I would also try establishing the adjacency without multicast (point-to-multipoint network should allow this).
Marcin

BGP and ASA NAT

Hello Everyone,
I have a need to multihome out two MAN links to the same ISP. The two links will connect via an ISR and will participate in an eBGP adjacency. On the internal side, iBGP will be used to create the alternate default route to the ISP. Each of the ISR’s downstream ports participates on the same Ethernet subnet. On the same subnet/broadcast domain, there are two ASA5510 appliances that will use HSRP to advertise the public IPv4 addresses and will NAT them into the private network.
My question is, since the ASAs do not participate in BGP, and since we are going to NAT the traffic eliminating the need to use a route map to inject the default route into the downstream EIGRP network, would I simply build a static default route in the ASAs out the upsteam interfaces? My initial thought is to not worry about recursive lookups because they are connected via Ethernet.
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 fa0/0; and so on.
I’ve attached a simple topology for reference.
Thanks…Matt

Yes Jcarvaja, HSRP is not a feature on the ASAs, and yes HSRP is difficult to setup natively to support active/active load balancing on any device. That's not really the point though is it. FHRP's are typically used for distribution switches and finely tuned to access layer 2 and layer 3 convergence, unless using GLBP (and even then should be considered). My mistake for using the term HSRP and thank you for pointing it out.
As for the iBGP links, they represent the same subnet as I mentioned. The cat switches are there to facilitate physical restraints as each pair of ISRs and ASAs are two miles apart. Since the ASA's are performing NAT, they don't really participate in the BGP network and there is no need or capability to inject the BGP default route into the EIGRP network. They will participate in the downstream EIGRP network. If the MAN connection on one ISR goes down, then the iBGP route to the Internet will be graduated. I guess I could have indicated on the drawing that these were all a part of the same subnet.
How do I configure the ASA's static default route? Wouldn't I be able to inject a static default route in each ASA using the ASA's outside interface when using active/active? If I have to, I could see if we can use EIGRP on the network upstream of the ASAs if there is no other way of doing this, but this is not preferred.
Any help you can provide is greatly appreciated.
Thank you...Matt

Async Traffic through and ASA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for