Asynchr Calls: Partner Role and My Role must be filled in Partner Link dial

Asynchr Calls: Partner Role and My Role must be filled in Partner Link dialog ?
Is the statement true?
Can I leave for synchronous calls one of the role spec vacant?
AFAIK only in asynchronous calls both drop down values must be specified.
Peter

Thanks for fast reply,
Yes, I defined Partner Role and My Role,and also defined a port type for calling back the request.
I just don't know what's the endpoint address which my asynch web service should use to response to my BPEL process.
Is there anyway to find out what's the endpoint address which the BPEL processes receive the callback response from asynchronous services?
Can I get the address which BPEL engine uses to get the responsse from a called web service?
I guess it should be an obvious work but I'm really disappointed with that.

Similar Messages

Security-role and security-role-assignment not working in WL7.0

Hello all..
Some EJB components that worked fine in WebLogic 6.1 no longer work in
WL7.0. It has to do with the security-role and security-role-assignment
descriptor elements no longer allowing anonymous users to be included in the
authorization for a bean.
For example, in WL6.1 placing these items in ejb-jar.xml:
<assembly-descriptor>
<security-role>
<role-name>Employees</role-name>
</security-role>
<method-permission>
<role-name>Employees</role-name>
<method>
<ejb-name>CustomerEJB</ejb-name>
<method-name>*</method-name>
</method>
</method-permission>
and mapping WebLogic default users to this role in weblogic-ejb-jar.xml:
<security-role-assignment>
<role-name>Employees</role-name>
<principal-name>guest</principal-name>
<principal-name>system</principal-name>
</security-role-assignment>
worked fine for clients creating their context using a simple
InitialContext() constructor without specifying SECURITY_PRINCIPAL or
SECURITY_CREDENTIALS. These users were basically "guest" to WebLogic, and
the security-role-assignment element above told WebLogic that "guest" was in
the Employees role for purposes of this EJB archive.
Worked in WL6.1, no longer works in WL7.0. Client receives typical
permission exception:
java.rmi.AccessException: Security violation: insufficient permission to
access method 'create'
If I explicity connect as "system" things are fine, or I can create a new
user in the default realm in WebLogic, put a matching <principal-name>
element in the section above, and connect as that user. Note that if I leave
off the <security-role> section completely, or set the required role name to
"everyone", the anonymous access works fine. Apparently the anonymous user
is a member of "everyone" behind the scenes even though "everyone" does not
appear in the realm list of groups or roles.
So, my question boils down to this: Is there a "magic" username in WL7 like
"guest" was in WL6.1 that can be mapped to the required role name, or must
every client connection use a true weblogic-created user with appropriate
role assignments used to map it to the required role name.
-Greg
P.S. Note that none of the EJB examples provided with WL used
<security-role>..
Check out my WebLogic 6.1 Workbook for O'Reilly EJB Third Edition
www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1931822468 or www.titan-books.com

Below are the screen shots for PFCG:

Business Role and PFCG Role

Hi all,
I am new to CRM 7.0 Can someone explain What is a Business Role in CRM 7.0 and what is the relationship between Business role and PFCG role. What is the transaction Code to create a Business role.
And also I heard that there is no PCUI in CRM 7.0. Is it true and if so what is used in place of the PCUI
Thanks.
Neha.

Neha,
Next time please do a search in this forum on business roles, and you would find many topics discussing this information more completely. I'm locking this thread due to it fact that this question has been asked many times before by many different people.
These threads explain the topic in more detail:
Re: Reg: Business Role
Assignment pfcg-role to user and assignment pfcg-role to business role
Thank you,
Stephen

Role and Reverse Role

Can the Role and Reverse Role fields be removed from the account competitor view? Thanks.

You can hide the Role fields in the Account Related Information Layout, which a user will see from the Account view. However, the fields are required, so when creating or editing a related account, users will have to see the fields. You can pre-default the values to make it easier for users, though.
Good Luck,
Thom

DB table for Derived Roles and Parent Roles

Hi Expart,
In which DB table the Derived Roles and Parent Roles are store .that is i need to find out the derived role and parent Role .i have completed the Complex and single role by table AGR_AGRS
But i have to find out the table for Derived Role
Plz help me to get those table
Thanks in advance
Tarak

It's the same table as for the master role: AGR_DEFINE (field PARENT_AGR is filled for derived roles).
~As from Forum

Security report with native roles and the roles they have access to.

We need a security report that shows the Native/Custom Roles and the roles that they have access to.
So, an example would be the role US_Acct, and the report would show what roles that has access to (Post Journals, Consolidate, etc).Can this be done?

Export the Provision report from Shared Services.
Upload report to Excel or Access.
Build Tables to show what tasks each Role has access to.
Build a report that links the provision report and the xref tables.
You should also do this with Security Classes.

Maintaining the authorizations for parent role and derived role

Hi Experts,
Kindly advice me the Pro and cons of the parent role and derived role.. below is the scenario
Currently we have created the 700 role in our regionally organization and we want to dervie the roles for each country
1 ) we want to do the Auth field (activity level) settings in parent role and Org levels in the derived role .
2) But one my collegue says do the default Auth filed ( activity values) common to every country in the parent role and diff activity one in the derived role .
please advice me wat will be the best scenario for mantaining the authorizations filed values like (activity level one)

I will try to answer both your queries here:
"my collegue says they are some NON ORG values different from each country ..suggest us to maintain all the default values in Parent role and auth with diff values needs to be maintained in derived role (child role).. "
The only set of values which should/can be different in a child role (when compared with its parent) will be the org level values. So if this filed is NON_ORG you will not be able to maintain it directly inside the child roles.....this is the basic principle of derived role conceptu2026 that the only item you will directly maintain in a child role are the org levels(which will come as u2018organisational levelsu2019 in the upper tab in the auth data of a role).
All NON_ORG fields inside a child role is acquired from the parent role. You should never change the values of any such fields (non-org fields) in the child role. these changes will get lost the next time you run the parent child inheritance from u201Cgenerate derived roleu201D function in your parent role.
Coming to the second question on how to run the program, you just need to enter the technical name of the field you want to convert (tech names like BUKRS, WERKS etc u2026 figure out the name of the concerned field you have in hand)u2026.executeu2026 you will that the field will now onwards appear as an org level value in all roles in the system and not just as a field inside the auth objectsu2026.I would suggest you take one field and try running it in ur dev or sandbox..see how the field changes in your roles.... the change can always be reverted by using PFCG_ORGFIELD_delete. ... you will understand it better....
Soumya

Funktion Roles and Value Roles

Hello,
i read in a SAP Press book something about funktion roles and value roles.
Can someone explain me how this work.
kind regards,
Bernhard

I would suggest taking preventative legal action against anyone who even mentions "functional and value" roles - particularly if they give the impression that transaction codes, activities and org-levels can be built in seperate roles - because when the concept goes downhill (which it will!) then they will unlikely be around to clean up the mess nor take responsibility for it.
Rather steer well clear of this type of concept.
Cheers,
Julius

Master role and derived role concept

Guys,
1) How to assign the organizational levels for the derived role?
Say for example, I have to create the derived roles with respect to the plant code.And after inheriting the tcodes ,authorizations from the master role , I noticed a pop up page with organizational level tabulation and I assigned the respective plant code there and in the same way for all the following derived roles.But the rest of the rows like company code,sales organization,distribution channel etc which are seen in the tabulation are left empty.I noticed that all the fields which are left empty in the org.levels of the derived roles are been filled up with the vaules of the corresponding master role org.level values when the derived button icon , which is seen under the authorization tab of master role is pressed.So pls let me know the correct procedure to assign.*Do we really need to maintain org.values for master roles?*
2) If a master role is transported to QA or PRD, will the derived role along with it move automatically?
3) Is master and derived role tested parallely in the QA system or first master role is tested ,followed by the derived role?
4) According to my understanding we dont assign any user to the master roles, but why do we move it to PRD?
Greatly appreciate for some body's help.

> 1) How to assign the organizational levels for the derived role?
> Say for example, I have to create the derived roles with respect to the plant code.And after inheriting the tcodes ,authorizations from the master role , I noticed a pop up page with organizational level tabulation and I assigned the respective plant code there and in the same way for all the following derived roles.But the rest of the rows like company code,sales organization,distribution channel etc which are seen in the tabulation are left empty.I noticed that all the fields which are left empty in the org.levels of the derived roles are been filled up with the vaules of the corresponding master role org.level values when the derived button icon , which is seen under the authorization tab of master role is pressed.So pls let me know the correct procedure to assign.*Do we really need to maintain org.values for master roles?*
Only if you assign the master roles to users. (and maybe for testing, see 3)
>
> 2) If a master role is transported to QA or PRD, will the derived role along with it move automatically?
Nope, but if one of it's derived roles is transported the master is automatically included in the transport. You'll have to make sure all derived roles are transported yourself.
>
> 3) Is master and derived role tested parallely in the QA system or first master role is tested ,followed by the derived role?
Best order is to do all unit testing wit the master, with all org levels at * and create the derived roles only when the master is tested and corrected to satisfaction. In that way the derived roles only have to be tested for organizational shielding.
>
> 4) According to my understanding we dont assign any user to the master roles, but why do we move it to PRD?
See 2, it goes there automatically. No choice.
Jurjen

Difference between SU01 ROLE and attribute ROLE in org.structure

HI,
In SU01 transaction ROLE tab employee role is assigned to the user.
In org. strucute attribute ROLE also contains the employee role.
what is the difference between ther two ?
we should mention employee role for the user in SUO1 and attribute ROLE both places to create shopping cart ?
please guide...points are alloted.
Thanks
mani

Hi SRM guys,
Just i want to know what is the perpose of the attribute - ROLE in Org.structure
and what is use of the ROLE tab in SU01 for user.
Both places ( attributes and in SUO1-ROLE tab ) need to give the sap_bbp_stal_employee role ??? to shop the user...
please confirm ..

Application roles and dynamic roles

Hello all,
In my custom workflow, i need to send approvals to some employees. The list of their positions are created in Lookup table. The procedure i am following now is, i am creating appliation roles and adding the names of the people who are in those positions to that role.
In the workflow, i am sending the notification to that role and all the people in that role get the notification.
My question is, how is this different from creating role dynamically?
Which one is preferable?
Thanks
Kumar

Hi,
How often do the users change? If there is a regular turnover of users, then it would be easier to maintain as an adhoc role which is created for each process and the users dynamically added to the role. If there is very little turnover of users in the table, then this is less of a maintenance overhead.
Do the users have an extra responsibility purely to receive the notification? If so, they might not want to see that as an option when they log in, in which case you should consider an adhoc role.
How many instances of the process are likely to be running at the same time? Who should be notified if the list of users changes during the process execution - the old list, or the new list? Depending on the answers, there are pros and cons of building the solution using responsibilities or adhoc roles - only you and your client know the answers, though.
Matt
WorkflowFAQ.com - the ONLY independent resource for Oracle Workflow development
Alpha review chapters from my book "Developing With Oracle Workflow" are available via my website http://www.workflowfaq.com
Have you read the blog at http://www.workflowfaq.com/blog ?
WorkflowFAQ support forum: http://forum.workflowfaq.com

Real role and ideal role comparison

Hello, ladies and gentlemen,
I would like to write an experimental program that would help me understand how some weird and big roles, I have here, were created. I feel that some parts of the roles come from the SU24 suggestions and some were obviously changed/ added manually.
Here is what I would like to compare
a) the ideal role, if it would be generated only (no manual changes) based on the SU24 suggestions for the "objects" listed in the role menu
The premise here is that I can generate a reasonable and usable role based on the SU24 entries only. If you think this is crazy, let me know, but also let/ help me build the report so I can learn myself:))
b) a real role - the one that exists in the system
I can get a list of the auth objects that are parts of the role easily (tab AGR_1251).
I can also get a list of SU24 suggestions for various objects I can use in the role menu.
The last step to be able to build the comparison is that I don`t know how to connect role menu entries with the role. Or better: I can easily get a list of transactions used in the menu. That`s fine. But I can also add a function module into the menu (for example) but see this one as a SERVICE in tables only, without the additional details (FM name would be nice).
So I am not able to use this "SERVICE" to go to USOBX_C and get the SU24 suggestions for the function module.
Can anybody suggest a way, how can I get a whole list of objects used in a role menu, not only the transactions?
Thanks,
Otto

Hi,
N means that you just added all transactions and additional stuff to user's menu in PFCG and you open authorizations for that role for the first time. So it takes all values from SU24 but you still need to enter values for all fields which don't have any proposed value in SU24. So it's really hard to tell what ideal role looks like. D means that it reads current authorizations for that role. So you can compare results. So you can have some extra authorizations in second results. These are manually added objects. You can have some extra authorizations in the first result. These should be deleted authorizations. Your problem will be with merged authorizations (it's impossible to split them).
BTW PRGN_ACTIVITY_PROF_INTERN_READ is used by SUPRN_AUTH_DATA_IN)_EXP_MODE and this FM is basically really similar to FM SUPRN_PROFILE_GENERATOR which is used in PFCG.
Cheers

Max enabled Roles and sub-roles

IS it possible to split the max enabled roles and the sub- for a given user: I have specified 60 as max enabled roles,
The user in question is assigned to some user groups where there is a large number or sub-roles, If I increase the max_enabled_roles_in the initxxx.ora to a figure which would permit the roles and subroles to work, it makes the max enabled roles quite large several hundred, which affects database performance.
I thought of splitting the user into several accounts, defined by user group, but I fear the user will not remember what he has been assigned to.
Any suggestions, (apart from throwing the user out of the window)?
Is there a mehtod in which I can split sub roles?
Thanks

Option 1 - Rationalize and reconstruct your current role plan. We did this here, and cut the number of roles we were using in half.
Option 2 - Use programming to enable only the required roles (set default role), for the application/form/report that is currently being run by the user.

Maintaining Backend roles and frontend roles(synchronising)

hello all,
I have a problem, and thats how will I maintain properly both backend roles in R/3 and frontend roles on the PORTAL? like ESS/MM ROLES for portal?
What I mean I can set them up, but I am worried on that if we setup a role for the backend we may not always remember to set up the backend roles if you know what I mean?
we use a template which has the role mapping i.e backend and frontend but how do we succesfully synchronise these 2 roles for each users, as each user will always have both roles setup, but worry is sometimes they wont be IN SYNC with each other?
this is worrying, any ideas?

Hello,
If both the roles are not synchronized, then the user will face authorization error.
Then we can conclude that both the roles are not synchronized.
thanks,
Darshan G

Share Same DbContext between web role and worker role

HI
My "Windows Azure Cloud Service" project consists of one web role (.NET MVC) and one worker role, they are working fine under "Emulator".
The web role project is orginally a Azure web site application which is converted to a web role project and the connectionstring is located in the web role application
http://thinkfirstcodelater.com/blog/?p=1922
When I try to access the dbcontext in worker role like this
public override void Run()
            // This is a sample worker implementation. Replace with your logic.
            Trace.TraceInformation("CCDWorker entry point called", "Information");
            while (true)
                Thread.Sleep(50000);
MyContext context = new MyContext();
                List<MyEntity> ccds = context.MyEntity.ToList();
                Trace.TraceInformation("Working", "Information");
I got this exception: "The model backing the context has changed since the database was created." Please help
Regards
Mark

Hi Mark,
Thanks for posting!
Like jeff said in this blog(http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2010/08/03/using-ef-code-first-with-an-existing-database.aspx ),When a model
is first created, we run a DatabaseInitializer to do things like create the database if it's not there or add seed data. The default DatabaseInitializer tries to compare the database schema needed to use the model with a hash of the schema stored in an EdmMetadata
table that is created with a database (when Code First is the one creating the database). Existing databases won’t have the EdmMetadata table and so won’t have the hash…and the implementation today will throw if that table is missing. We'll work on changing
this behavior before we ship the fial version since it is the default. Until then, existing databases do not generally need any database initializer so it can be turned off for your context type by calling:
Database.SetInitializer<YourDatabaseContext>(null);
Also, you could refer to this thread,http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3600175/the-model-backing-the-database-context-has-changed-since-the-database-was-crea
Regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Asynchr Calls: Partner Role and My Role must be filled in Partner Link dial

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for