ATP Check for deliveries

Hi Experts
Can we perform check against deliveries in APO GATP?
What are the prerequesites to perform ATP check against deliveries.
In scope of check  we want to select production orders which are in released status.
Please give your inputs.
Regards

Preetam,
After creating the supporting configuration, APO ATP checking is thereafter 'turned on' by creating and activating an ATP integration model in the ERP.  Generally, it is done by material/plant combination.  Therefore, if you turn on ATP checking for Sales orders, you also turn it on for all other types of docs (including deliveries) for that particular material/plant combination.
I hope you have thought out this whole process.  The main reason for using ATP checking in APO is that APO has a richer suite of ATP solutions.  If your business requirements are satisfied by the ATP checking in ERP, then it makes no sense to spend the money to implement ATP in APO. Your original issue had to do with making released production orders relevant for ATP for deliveries.  If this is the only new requirement, then this can easily be managed in ERP.  OVZ9>select your Availability check, with checking rule B (deliveries).  Under "incl production orders" select 'F'.  From a business perspective, this means that some of your deliveries will be created without stock on hand, and therefore will not be immediately shippable.  You need to make sure that this process change is integrated throughout your warehouses.
And, to your final question.  If your delivery item category(s) are already relevant for ATP checking in ERP, they will also be relevant for ATP checking in APO.  Since deliveries do not use RBA, you do not have to worry about adding new ERP delivery item categories for the conversion to APO ATP checking.  Most commonly in APO, one uses only the 'product check' (similar to the standard ERP ATP check) for deliveries.
Rgds,
DB49

Similar Messages

  • ATP check for delivery in ECC & Sales order ATP check in APO

    Hi All,
    Can we do an ATP check for delivery in ECC , but for the same set of Materials- Plant combination , the ATP check when a SO is created should happen in APO .
    We do not want to remove the Business event 'B'  which is meant for delivery in  APO . For some materials we need APO ATP check to happen for delivery   & for some it should be in ECC  & for SO  the ATP check should happen in APO .
    Even if we do not have check instructions pertaining to Business event 'B' & a particular check mode (for the materials where the ATP check for delivery should happen in ECC & SO check to happen in APO)  , when we are doing an ATP check for delivery , it is still pointing to APO ATP check rather than ECC check .
    Any pointers for this is highly appreciated.
    Regards
    Surendra

    Hi Surendra,
    For SO, business event is A and for delivery it's B. When integrated with ECC, the check rule in ECC points as biz event in APO.
    You can control ATP check by customized settings for check rule in ECC.
    Also, by setting requirement class and requirement type in ECC, you control check mode in APO. So, even if you dont define for check mode in APO, the system might refer from ECC for the ATP check settings. Look into your ECC customization for how requirement class is derived and settings for requirement type. (based on MRP type, strategy grp and Item cat).
    I'm not sure how you can control ATP to happen for some sales orders/deleveries in ECC and for some in APO, since check mode is mentioned in material master.
    However, there are ATP BADIs (business add-ins) available in both ECC and APO, whch can serve your purpose.
    Regards,
    Bipin

  • User exit in ATP Check for sales Order to trigger notification

    Hi All
    please let me  know is there any user exit after ATP check or in ATP check for sales order to trigger a notication mail.
    Regards
    Kishore

    Hi,
    User Exits For Availability Check are given below:-
    The user exits named here are planned for projects that are to be carried out in agreement with SAP development as they may only be used in consultation with SAP.
    USEREXIT_PLANT_SELECTION in program RV03VFZZ is an exception to this rule (see below).
    User exits in program FV45VFZZ
    USEREXIT_ADD_FIELD_TO_HEADER
    USEREXIT_ADD_FIELD_TO_LINE
    User exits in program FV45VFZY
    USEREXIT_DELIVERY_GROUPS
    USEREXIT_MVERF_INIT
    USEREXIT_QUOTA_KEY_VALUE
    User exits in program RV03VFZZ
    USEREXIT_AVAILABILITY_IN
    USEREXIT_AVAILABILITY_OUT
    USEREXIT_DARA_REFRESH
    USEREXIT_PLANT_SELECTION
    This user exit is used to adjust the flow during plant transfer. A list of permitted plants, where this material is created, is determined and checked in the standard R/3 delivery. A dialog box appears where you can select the plants. The user exits allow you to modify the plant table so that plant selection takes place in advance for every flagged selection and a dialog box becomes unnecessary.
    regards
    Vivek.

  • ATP Check for Bill of materials in Variant configuration

    Hello Guru's,
    Will variant configuration supports the following functionality please?
    ATP check for Bill of  materials in variant configuration is possible, is there any way to put labor cost while working on assembling variants. Material substitution is possible while configure a variant product.
    Will any one share your experience that will be of great help.

    solved by adding an additional condition in pricing procedure

  • ATP check for multiple materials on multiple sales document

    Hi,
    System 4.70
    Is it possible to carry out an ATP check for multiple materials on multiple sales documents.
    I have written a bespoke program and the program requires an ATP check to be performed for each material and sales document, I am currently using BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILABILITY which is bringing back the necessary information but it's a bit slow.
    Does any one have any ideas please.
    Regards
    J-J

    The ATP Check using the BAPI is done per material and plant. If you're looping through sales documents and then materials you're probably doing the ATP check for the same material over and over again.
    Just get the list of materials you need and the corresponding plants and call the BAPI for each of them.
    Also do a run-time analysis (tcode SE30) to check exactly what slows down your program.
    regards.

  • ATP check for component materials

    Hello experts,
    The ATP check was initially designed for a kitting process. BOM Material would be kitted in the distribution center(DC) and sent to a garage. Sales orders are created with BOM materials for a garage and there is a multi- level GATP process in place. Since BOM materials do not  exist at a garage the check would be performed at a DC for components after BOM explosion. The existing configurations in R3 and APO are for a make to order process(Strategy  group of 50 for BOM's  and 40 for component).
    We are now introducing new materials for an existing material and have the need for product substitution on the sales order, if the existing material is out of stock at the DC. To enable this functionality we are having to perform an ATP check for the sales orders at the distribution center, though the sales order is   created for a garage. To improve on the response times during the ATP check our design approach, is to convert the BOM materials in the sales order to component  materials with material determination(one BOM material is tied to one component material) and performing the ATP check with components at the DC.
    While testing we are facing the following issues:
    1)Sales order placed on a garage is substituted with the DC after product substitution.  This does not occur when product substitution is carried out with BOM's.
    2)During the order create, the ATP checks for check mode u201845u2019 and business event u2018AEu2019 for a given material in a DC shows zero stock. While for the same material,location and business event AE the product availability check in APO reflects stocks available.
    Is it feasible to do ATP checks for component material in a sales order which was initially designed to work with BOM materials? Am I missing some configuration settings in either APO or R3?
    Regards,
    Anil DeSouza

    Hi Anil,
         Yes it can be done.
    1) For finished product & garage combination -
    activate RBATP in the check instructions.
    2) in the location substitution maintain 'location determination sctivity'. Here you maintain different check mode & business event -- ( this is nothing but check instruction --- in thsi you maintain 'MATP').
    Hope this anws your first qus.
    To addressing your 2nd question....follow below steps.
    1) Do ATP from sales order, get onto results screen, click on product availability & check for 'scope of check' (check control) and look for the stock types that are included. Based on this your receipts are consdiered for ATP confirmation.
    Best Regards,
    Deepthi

  • ATP check for STOs

    Hi,
    Can ATP be set for intercompany STOs?
    If so , can anyone list it please.
    Regards
    Krishna

    Hi
    Yes we can setup ATP check for STO...
    actually ATP will be depends on the combination of the checking group and checking rule
    checking group :  is defined at material master sales/plant view in availability check field..
    Checking rule : In standard this will be assigned to application internally ex : sales order - A (sales order)
                           delivery - B (delivery)..
    In STO we need to define the checking rule for purchase order type and shipping plant combination...
    menu path :
    IMG -- MM -- Purchasing -- PO -- set up stock transport order -- assign delivery type and checking rule....
    hope it solves your probs
    Muthu

  • ATP Check for Components for Variant Configuration

    Hi Gurus,
    Does it exist a way to perform the ATP Check for components (in variant configuration) like in a test?
    I mean, I know that when I create a SO (with the correct settings) the system will perform the ATP Check for components (Missing parts list). But is it possible to do this without trying to create the SO? Maybe a tcode as CU50 or PMEVC where I could enter the variant configuration values, then it explodes the BOM and do the ATP Check (as a simulation).
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards.

    Hi Christopher,
    If you enable the "Component Availability" within your configuration profile (under Confign initial screen, Confign Parameters), then you will see an additional option within CU50 while configuring.  By pressing this button, you can see an availability check as of the date specified on the CU50 initial screen.  You can also modify the quantity on the CU50 initial screen for a more realistic simulation of a sales order (where a customer may order more than one of a product).  See screenshots below:
    In CU42:
    In Value Assignment of CU50:
    Hope this helps!

  • ATP check for batch managed products

    Hello All,
    I have a requirement for ATP check for batch managed products and would be glad if someone can help me on that.  One of the characteristics on my product is expiry date. Business wants to restricts confirming products which has an expiry date of less than 90 days for orders outside the country. How can we achieve that?

    Hello
    You can try with activating Shelf Life Expiration Date (SLED).
    For config, check SPRO - Logistice General - Batch master - SLED
    Then finally setup Customer Exit to calculate/check the SLED.
    Exit EXIT_SAPLMHD1_001 for enhancement SAPLMHD1.
    Further, you can refer following SDN thread for reference/understanding:
      - SLED by customer/ material
    Regards
    JP

  • Collective ATP check for production orders

    Hi Gurus,
    I tried the MDVP tcode, but I can only do the collective ATP check for planned orders. we wanted to do the collective check with production orders, can you tell me how I can do this?
    Thanks.

    I've posted this question but didn't get any response. Can some one please give me an idea how to do the collective ATP check for production orders.
    Thanks
    Vijaya

  • ATP check for CRM Orders using ECC is creating a replication problem

    Hi Guys,
    I have created an order in CRM and it replicated to ECC,however the issue is I'm unable to change the order any more in CRM, message "Document is being distributed". I'm getting this issue after activating ATP check for CRM -ATP check is working perfectly.
    Before this ATP check, the Order replication was working perfectly and i can do the changes to order in both systems.
    In advance many thanks for your your help.
    Thanks and Regards
    SRIM

    hI,
    Thanks for your response,
    There are no messages in the middleware (smq2 - q1), but this error only started occurring after I activated the ATP check.
    I have also checked the incompletion log at ECC - document is completed.
    Before this ATP check activation the order replication was working correct/y and i can do changes at both ECC and CRM. But now even if i change the order in ECC those changes are not getting replicated infact  queue is not getting generated.
    BDOC is showing sent to receivers (not all confirmed)  BUS_TRANS_MSG.
    Thanks and Regards
    srikanth

  • How to configure ATP check for "create standard order in SD (OR type)"

    first, I had check my stock, I only have ten PC
    , but when I enter 100 PC in a OR order, and issue ATP check, it is carries out, why? I had set availavility check into 02 in MRP3 view

    Availability check
    1. Availability check is an integral part of the business process that determines if the required delivery quantity can be met on a required delivery date. For this purpose the system takes into account pre-delivery activities such as scheduling for picking or packing times and the time taken to produce or obtain the material. It also performs several background functions such as Backorder processing, rescheduling and ATP quantities.
    2. Backorder processing: processing of a sales order that has not been fully confirmed or not confirmed at a certain delivery date.
    3. Rescheduling: is a proposal of how u2013 confirmed quantities already assigned to a sales order can be reassigned to other sales orders that have a higher priority.
    4. Available to promise (ATP): is a process of checking the available quantities of a material. The ATP quantity consists of warehouse stock + planned receipts (incoming stock) u2013 planned issues (outgoing stock). to examine stock on hand (CO09) proceed to logistics u2013 sales & distribution u2013 sales u2013 environment u2013 availability overview.
    5. Replenishment lead time (RLT): is the time taken for the material to become available either internally (in house production) or externally (from a vendor). The most important things to consider during an external procurement are purchasing and MRP2 (procurement) views of MMR where the processing time for purchasing, planned delivery time and goods receipt processing time are taken into account. On the other hand internal procurement is based on in house production time (MRP 2 view) goods receipt processing time or alternatively RLT time, which is found on MRP 3 view.
    6. RLT (Replenishment Lead Time) is the time taken for the material to become available. RLT is only used when doing an ATP check (Available To Promise). The value of RLT for a material is specified on material master record.
    7. There are three types of availability checks u2013
    Check on basis of ATP quantities.
    Check against product allocation.
    Check against planning.
    Configuring Availability check through Checking Groups
    1. The checking group + checking rule determine how the availability check is to be performed.
    2. The checking group determines whether and how the system checks the stock availability and generates requirements for material planning. The checking group defines what type of requirements will be passed on i.e. summarized requirements (daily/weekly) or individual requirements for each sales order.
    3. The checking rule applies to how the availability check is to be carried out at the transaction level. Note that you must define checking rules for each individual application such as for production orders for example. In Sales and Distribution, the checking rule is specified internally within the system and cannot be changed.
    4. The checking rule, in conjunction with the checking group, determines the scope of the availability check for every business operation; that is, which stocks, receipts and issues are to be included in the availability check and whether the check is to be carried out with or without the replenishment lead time.
    5. Briefly explaining the above u2013 checking group determines which type of requirement to be passed on to MRP whether it be individual or summarized and checking rule which is at the transaction level and can be configured independently for each application module, determines which stocks, receipts and issues to be taken into account. For performing an availability check checking group has to work in conjunction with checking rule.
    6. Advantages of individual processing over summarized processing u2013
    Backorder processing is possible.
    You can access (MD04) order, line and schedule line individually which gives a greater control on available stock and requirements placed on stock.
    The system automatically uses individual requirements in case of special stock items.
    7. Required data for the Availability check to be carried out u2013
    The Availability check must be switched on at the requirement class level.
    The Availability check must be set at the schedule line level.
    A requirements type must exist by which the requirements class can be found.
    A plant must be defined in the sales order for each schedule line item (in other words plant must be defined for every material in MMR).
    A checking group must be defined in the material master record in the MRP3 screen in the availability check field.
    8. Configuring Availability check and defining Checking Groups u2013
    Checking groups are introduced into the sales order based on the setting in the material master record.
    SAP standard checking groups are 01 u2013 summarized requirements and 02 u2013 individual requirements or you can create your own by copying the standard ones.
    Total sales and total deliveries columns are there to configure a checking rule to sum up requirements to post to MRP either individually or by day or week.
    Block quantity required can be set if you want several users to be able to process the material simultaneously in different transactions without blocking each other.
    The no check indicator is CHECKED when you DO NOT want the system to carry out ATP check.
    9. Defining material block for other users u2013 the block check box is an indicator that enables you to block material master records of a particular material during the availability check and restrict other users from accessing same master record and reserve the material. If the block is not set, two users can confirm the same material at the same time for two different orders, not knowing if the stock is available or not. If you select this field, the material is blocked during the availability check and other users cannot: a) Make changes in the material master record. b) Create purchase orders for the material. C) Create orders for the material.
    10. Defining default values for checking groups - Checking groups are introduced into the sales order based on the setting in the material master record.
    However if there is no entry present in the material master record for the checking group, a default value can be set here, depending on material type and plant.
    This default value will be used by the system depending on the material type mentioned in MMR and plant in sales order.
    If an entry exists, this default value is over written by MMR.
    11. Controlling Availability Check u2013 in this section, you tell the system what stock on hand and what inward and outward movements of stock it must take into account when performing the availability check in addition to whether or not to consider the replenishment lead time.
    12. These settings are based on the checking group that is assigned to the material master record and the checking rule that is predefined and assigned to the sales and distribution transaction.
    13. These settings carry out control both for sales order and delivery as well. This is due to the fact that you may want to include specific stock or incoming stock for the sales order, yet at the time of the delivery only include physical stock on hand waiting to be shipped.
    14. It is possible to indicate to the system that you would like the availability check NOT TO CHECK the stock at the storage location level. This indicator is used to set the scope of the availability check.
    15. It is used to switch off the check at storage location level. You create a reservation for a particular storage location. However, the scope of the availability check is set in such a way as to exclude the storage location. In this case, the system carries out the check at plant level only and does not take the storage location into account that is specified in the reservation.
    16. Should you not want the system to automatically check RLT, you may indicate so here. RLT is the time taken for a material to become available. It is only used when doing an ATP check and is taken from MMR.
    17. defining the elements in the availability check entirely depends on the business needs, but a few tips are given under u2013
    When controlling the Availability check at the time of the sales order, a purchase requisition does not necessarily indicate by it is going to come into the plant.
    A shipping notification on the other hand - a confirmed purchase order u2013 is a good indicator of receiving stock on a specified date.
    It is always recommended not to select the shipping notifications for the delivery requirements type as you may not actually receive the stock into plant or warehouse for which you are creating a delivery.

  • ATP check for materials and ATP Confirmed Qty's

    Good morning,
    I have a question regarding the ATP.
    If I have a 100 of box a in stock and I have 2 Planned Orders for 75 (total req on box is 150).
    When I convert the first Planned Ord to a Prodution Ord, the ATP check will run and confirm that I have the 75 boxes required (as we want it), but if I then convert the second Planned Order I would expect the ATP to say that only 25 is available, but it is also telling me that the 75 boxes required are available.
    Can I set the ATP to confirm/allocate the first 75 boxes to the first Production Order and when the second order runs ATP to only commit to 25?
    Thanks in advance.
    ATP novice :o)

    Hi Guy Hall,
    Please check with, "include dependent reservation and production order" has been activated for  checking rule used for production order at "avilabilty checking scope"
    Regards
    Pradeep

  • ATP check for inbound EDI order

    Hi Friends,
    When I am creating outbound sales order then ATP check is getting executed properly & multiple schedule lines are getting creating in IDOC also (depending on the avaibility of stock).
    But When I am trying to create the inbound sales order via EDI/IDOC there is no ATP check performed & multiple schedule lines are not getting created in sales order(as per the avaibility of stock which I am checkin thro So09 tcode).
    ANy1 has faced smilier problem in past. If yes then please let me know how to solve this problem of ATP check.
    PLease let me know as soon as possible.
    Many thanks in advance
    Br, Prashant

    HI Frndz,
    problem is solved by using following customizing settings
    Customizing:
    SD/function/requirement availability/availability check/default (OVZJ)
    Change the field "Rule availability" to the required value. You receive a list of the possible values using the possible entries pushbutton. Rescheduling is regarded as background processing. If you want to allow partial deliveries, choose the value 'E'.

  • ATP Check for service parts and procurement scenario

    Dear Experts,
    We're testing CRM service scenario, focusing on the ATP check.
    After running the avaiability check for the service parts in the service order,
    is it posssible to determine the scenario automatically as follows?
    - when the necessary parts items are not available
    -> "Procurement" scenario will be used.
    The corresponding documents such as PO, PR or Reservation will be generated in ERP according to the setting "Define Logistics Scenario for the Procurement of Materials and Services".
    - when the necessary parts items are available in stock
    -> "Material withdrawal" scenario will be used. The items will be withdrawn at the service confirmation.
    From our understanding, the determination of the above scenario is controlled by the item type(ex.SRVP),
    so we expect that the system sets the appropriate item type depending on whether the item is available or not.
    Is there any possible solution for this?(i.e.standard customizing, BAdI etc....)
    Any advice would be higly appreciated.
    Best regards,
    F.T.

    Hi F.T,
    I have worked in Service Order Management Scenario, but not integration of Service Orders for ATP Check. But I found this Presentation which I hope might be somewhat helpful regarding the feasibility of the Business Scenario. You can have look at  the same and will be able to decide if this is the correct way forward or not.
    [Presentation|http://www.google.co.in/#hl=en&biw=1366&bih=548&q=ATPCheckforservicepartsandprocurementscenarioinSAPCRM+++&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&fp=a254323013e5943b]
    Hope this will help.
    Thanks,
    Samantak.

Maybe you are looking for