ATP For Inquiry VA 11

We would like to create a quick inquiry screen.
I have customized the screen VA11 layout. We basically want to enter a customer-material and get back price and availability. I would like ATP to run and PROPOSE a delivery date - like it does in a standard order.
Is there a setting on the configuration side that will allow me to run ATP by order type?
Thanks.

I think it depends on which availability check you use, for rule-based check - you define a link at doc.type level,
for other avail.check types types - at schedule line category level.
NOTE : to have schedule lines your item category should have "Sch.Line allowed" selected and sched. line categories assigned to your item category.
btw, usually SL category of inquiry does not lock qty - means if you have qty 10 available and try to create 2 inquiries simultaneously - they both will show 10 as confirmed.

Similar Messages

Free goods determination for Inquiry quotation

Hello gurus
when am doing free good dertermination for order line item display is
order quantity is 10. 9+1
its showing line item 9+1
the prob is when we are creating free good for Inquiry and quotiton , main item only displaing
can u pls tell me how to solve the issue
thanks
shameer

Hello,
Free goods are only supported for sales orders with document category C (Orders).
As you know the document category for Inquiry is A and quotation is B. So it will not work for them.
Prase

How pricing is taken care for Inquiry document

Hi,
I find a problem in creating inquiry
The basic price PR00 is missing and it shows as an error
1) I have maintained in Item category
2) The document pricing procedure is maintained for inquiry doc type\
3) Condition record is also maintained.
What is that I have missed that is causing the error. kindly help me on this.
Rgds

Hi,
Please enter the pricing date while creating Inquiry. As pricing date is missing system is not taking the price automatically.
Hope this will resolve your issue.
Regards,
Krishna O

ATP for Internal orders

Hi All,
I'm a new Oracle user asking for your help. We are using the ATP for make-to-order items only in order to assign to the sales orders a scheduled ship date that consider the manufacturing LT set up in the "Cumulative Manufacturing" field in the org item. We receive two different types of orders- Sales orders and Internal Orders. It looks like the ATP works for the sales orders only. Could you advise if it is possible to set it up for internal orders as well?
Many thanks

Hi
Thanks, but the internal sales orders will be sent to APO with a new Z ATP category. We want to know if this new Z ATP category can be used for example in the BOP also for back order processing.
Also if there are inconsistencies, can inconsistent sales orders with the Z ATP category also be recognized in the Delta report, or do we need to make enhancements?
I could not find a clear note which describes if you create a new ATP catagory for sales orders in APO which standard APO eports will work seamlessly with the new ATP categoy. And if the below reports should be enhanced (user exits, BADI etc) to make sure sales orders assigned to a custom ATP category will also be included in the comparisson between APO and R/3.
Backorder processing: /SAPAPO/BOP
Deltareport: /SAPAPO/CIF_DELTAREPORT3
Correction report: /SAPAPO/SDRQCR21

APO Rule based ATP for RA Repair

Hey,
Could you please help me to turn on rule based ATP for document type RA outbound?
The senario is as follows:
Customer returns to my company the product.
My company has multiple locations (plants) for replacement products. I would like to determine the replacement product location with rule-based ATP. We use rule-based ATP for the sales site w/o issues.
I set up in configuration:
ZRA (copy of RA) with business transaction RMA(to trigger the rule based ATP)
Assigned ZRA / Item usage = R104/ PSTYV= ZXNN (item category allows rule based ATP).
ZRA     ZNO1     R104     IRRA     ZXNN
I also did the below rules based ATP item catgegory determination:
AUART        MTPOS         VWPOS        UEPST         PSTYV
ZRA     ZNO1     APO0     ZTP1     ZXNN
ZRA     ZNO1     APO1          ZTP1
ZRA     ZNO1     APO1     ZXNN     ZTP1
ZRA     ZNO1     APO2     ZTP1     ZXNN
When I create with VA01 a ZRA order and add a replacement plant then I get this message:
The ATP rules are not called up for item 000030 - Message no. /SAPAPO/ATP147
But when I go from the "APO Availability Check" view to the Rule then I see my rules determined.
The detail message also says that the system "things" the line was already delivered, which is not the case.
Could you please tell me if it is possible to combine rule-based ATP with the RA replacement process and if yes how to do it?
Thanks,
Sabine

Check OSS Note 571044 - RBA: Use of calculation profiles and rules
Regards,

Turn off ATP for a Storage Location

Hi,
I want to turn off ATP for a Storage Location.
I am aware of a setting on IMG where we can have this done but not able to find the right node.
Can someone help me with it?
availability check NOT TO CHECK the stock at the storage location level
Thanks,
Mike

Availability checks can be triggered either automatically or manually:
The availability of components in an order can be checked automatically during order creation and/or order release. You specify in CustomizingOPJK per order type and plant whether the availability should be checked automatically. In addition, an automatic availability check can be carried out when the order is saved.
You can always trigger a manual availability check
The checking scope is defined via the Checking Group (in the material master) and the valid Checking Rule (in Customizing).
They define:
Which MRP elements are taken into account in the check
Which inventory categories are taken into account
Whether the replenishment lead time is taken into account
Whether the check is also to be carried out at storage location level
In Customizing (checking control) you specify which quantity is used to check the availability of a material. You can choose between the following:
Availability Check Against Planned Independent Requirements
In the check against planned independent requirements, the system only checks the open planned independent requirement quantities created for the components. This means that the ATP quantity is not included in this availability check nor are receipts or stocks.
This type of availability check is most useful:
if assembly planning or phantom assembly planning is used to plan the components
if quick statements about the availability situation are required and the results from this check are precise enough
The system uses the open planned independent requirements quantity at component level to determine a committed quantity and this quantity is copied to the planned order header in the Committed quantity field. As opposed to the availability check according to ATP logic, however, the committed quantity is not recorded in the dependent requirements. The planned independent requirements of the components are not consumed by the committed quantity but by the complete dependent requirements quantity. In availability checks that follow, the system can only commit quantities for the amount of planned independent requirements that have not yet been consumed.
In the availability check against planned independent requirements, the following dates/quantities are not calculated:
overall commitment date
partial commitment date/quantity
ATP quantity
In the check according to ATP logic, the system checks whether the dependent requirements of each component are covered by specific receipt and issue elements or by stock. This check is carried out dynamically, that is, each time you carry out the check, the system recalculates the current situation. If a quantity can be committed for the requirement date, the system enters precisely this quantity as the committed quantity in the dependent requirements and the ATP quantity for the components is reduced by the committed quantity. Therefore, in the next availability check, dependent requirements can only be committed for the amount of the remaining ATP quantity.

ATP for deliveries

Hi,
I want to know how to set up ATP for deliveries.
Can ATP enabled at the order entry level AND at the delivery stage?
When a delivery is created, stock is in the D tab in stock requirement list- which indicates that requirement and stock is in delivery.
If ATP is enabled at this point- does that mean we can still re shuffle the stock at that point?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
You can activate availability check at delivery level too.
1) In OVZ9, maintain the combination of 02 and B for deliveries since the checking rule in deliveries is B.
2) Unlike the answer given by someone else before, you cannot activate ATP by delivery type. You have to activate the ATP at the delivery item category level in OVLP. By default, ATP check is switched on and you can deactivate that by item categories like Stock material and service materials.
3) Regarding you question on shuffling the quantities, always remember the fact the when you create a delivery, stocks are ALWAYS HARD COMMITTED. That means you cannot now allocate the stock to anything else unlike sales order. That is the reason why Deliveries are never a part of Rescheduling or backorder processing. In fact, we use this fact to reserve stocks for important customers by creating a dummy delivery so that stocks get reserved and no one else can take that.
Hope that helps.

ATP for Order Create vs Order Release

In SAP there is an option for different ATP checks when creating a production order and when releasing a production order. I'm not sure I understand the behavior we are seeing in our system. Could be I have a fundamental misunderstanding of the functionality.
In our configuration, ATP for production order create takes into consideration open purchase orders. ATP for order release does not. When I go into CO06/CO09 using the checking rule for order create, I see the commitments which include the open purchase order quantities. When I go in using the checking rule for order release, my expectation is that the commitments for the purchase order quantities will not be there. Nonetheless, those commitments appear. I'm receiving missing parts when I'm trying to release a production order even though there is sufficient material not committed to released production orders.
I hope that makes sense. Any guidance would be appreciated.

Yes. We have a different checking rule in OPJK for production order create (YO) and one for production order release (YP). YO includes purchase orders as a supply element in the check and YP does not. Other than that, they are identical.
I am saying that when looking at CO09 with YP, I saw commitments based on purchase orders.
Purchase orders are a supply element.
MD04 - 18,606 on hand. Order reservations for 1,512, 9,329, and 709 are for released orders. The order reservations for 18,657 and 23,322 are for created orders.
CO09 - Checking Rule YO. Because of purchase order for 45,000, all quantities are confirmed.
CO09 - Checking rule YP. All quantities still confirmed.

Can we calculate ATP for ATO model in OM without ASCP installed?

Hi,
Can we calculate ATP for ATO model in Order Management without ASCP installed?
We are using MRP/supply chain planning module only.
thank you,
Robert

Thanks for the reply, but this note was not addressing the above stated issue. In this note for matched configuration, they are not able to view pegging else they are able to perform multilevel atp check.
Can anyone help me to reslove this issue.
Thanks
Edited by: user604737 on Jun 18, 2011 4:48 AM
Edited by: user604737 on Jun 19, 2011 11:50 PM

ATP for Sender JDBC Adapter

Hi All,
I need to run a stored procedure once in a day.I have the following questions while using ATP for this.
>> If i use ATP to achieve this,how to make sure that the stored procedure will be executed only once.
>>Do we need to maintain ATP manually on each system or it will be transported with the Comm channel?
>> what happens to ATP settings when the PI system restarts?
I appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Monish

Hi Monish,
I would suggest to include a check inside your stored procedure. Create a table containing procedure_id and process_timestamp fields. Once your procedure gets called from XI, check wether an entry with process_timestamp for the current day exist. If so, don't execute procedure. If not insert new process_timestamp along with procedure_id.
Thus you can guarantee that the stored proc is executed only once a day. I think it's not really possible to guarantee that behaviour using PI methods only (regarding restart of PI for example).
Regards
Sven

ATP for sales order

Hello,
Could someone please tell me how do we determine if the client site is presently using ATP for sales order. Does OVJ9/OVJ2 tell us if they have turned the ATP check on? Any help is much appreciated.
thanks

Availability check can be turned on/off at two levels in SD.
1) In Schedule line category VOV6
2) In Requirements class OVZ9
If the checkbox is not selected in any of the above two then availability check will not happen during order processing.
Regards,
GSL.

ATP for sales orders

Hi,
Does anybody know how to switch off ATP ONLY for Sales Orders?
Customer would like to have ATP for deliveries, but not for sales orders. This means whatever delivery date will be entered during SO creation, system will accept it without ATP. On the other hand if there is nothing on stock system should create delivery with "delivered qty" = 0
The only transaction which connects ATP type (02 in this case) with checking rule (here: A- Sales order) is OVZ9. But I cannot switch off ATP there. I can only define different settings for sales order and delivery.
If I change settings in OVZ0, then it will switch off ATP for both: sales order and delivery
Customer has only one requirement class ZXX, so in OVZ) I can switch off ATP, but unfrotunatelly for both (sales order and delivery).
In standard I see requirement type 031 (Order requirements) and 011 (Delivery requirement), so I think this is the way I should go.
I've checked SPRO here:
Availability Check and Transfer of Requirement --> Transfer of Requirements --> Determination of Requiremenr Types Using Transaction.
The problem is that for one item category I can assign only one requirement type (ZXX in this case).
How do I switch off ATP only for sales orders?
Is it possible?
regards
Rafal

Dear Rafal,
If your requirement is "whatever delivery date will be entered during SO creation, system will accept it"
then try this,
Go to IMG-SD-Basic Function-Delivery Scheduling & Transportation Scheduling-Define Scheduling by Sales Doc Type.
Select the Sales Doc type & make the "Delivery Sch" field blank.
By this the system will accept the date whatever you put. (for that sales Doc type only)
Pls let me know, whether the problem is solved or not.
Thanks

Delivery from Sale Order for Inquiry stock

Dear All,
We have unique requirement from client mentioned below, any help would be greatly appreciated.
This is a trading sale which is initiated from inquiry.
1. Inquiry is created in SD, which in turn triggers Purchase Requisition.
2. PR is converted to RFQ.
3. Based on RFQ prices are negotiated with vendors, then Quotation is sent to Customer from VA21 which is created against inquiry.
4. Now when the PO is created w.r.t RFQ, then GR is done , Stock will be lying against inquiry.
5. But i want to do delivery from sales order for stock lying against inquiry.
we are looking for a workaround solution.
Note:
1. Client has disagreed with Stock Movement from Inquiry to quotation using MB1B, as it becomes manual transaction.
2. PR triggering has to be @ Inquiry, as sale order will not be created until quotation is approved.
Looking forward for valuable inputs.
Thanks in advance
Best Regards,
Chaithru

Tien,
Approval will not work when you have mutiple rows of data. You would have to work with SP Transaction Notification
There has been threads before on the forum on the same topics.
Block the Quantity in Sales Delivery
Approval Procedure for chaning quantity in Delivery Document
Suda

ATP for 'Stock in transit' for 3rd Party scenario

We have a scenario:
For warehouse replenishments an STO is created and then a delivery is subsequently created for the STO. Once the delivery has been shipped out of the manufacturing facility (post goods issued) the materials on the delivery are transferred from unrestricted-stock at the manufacturing facility to stock-in-transit at the receiving warehouse. Once the stock is in transit to the third-party warehouses, ATP should then take it into consideration when deliveries are created from the third-party warehouses to customers.
Now how to take the ATP check for 3rd party del. into consideration for STO?
STO document type is UD
Goods issue movement type is 641
Goods receipt movement type is 101

Some useful info here..
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/2b/b22d3b1daca008e10000000a114084/frameset.htm

Need suggestions for Sales Order ATP for Material STO in from other Plant

Our client does not want to stock inventory at either the DC or the Manufacturing Plant. They receive a Sales Order at the DC and the ATP check is set up to check Stock at the DC (likely none); inbound Stock Transport Orders (likely none) and then resort to the Replenishment Lead time.
The Replenishment Lead time for externally procured materials (F) with Special Procurement key (STO it in from the manufacturing plant) is the Planned Delivery Time in the Material Master. The problem is the Planned Delivery time is just the 5 days it takes to get the stock from the manufacturing plant to the DC. If the Manufacturing plant has no inventory (which is very likely since we don't maintain PIRs to stock it prior) we will promise the customer delivery in 5 days which is much too soon.
We cannot inflate the Planned Delivery time to be the 5 days of transit plus the 30 days of total procurement and manufacturing time at the manufacturing plant because then the MRP signal will tell the manufacturing plant to buy and make much too soon.
They don't want to ship goods directly from the manufacturing plant; they must be shipped from the DC.
I realize that this is not a good business process but is there a solution for this?
Edited by: AnnHustis on Jan 21, 2012 6:26 PM
Edited by: AnnHustis on Jan 21, 2012 6:35 PM

Ann,
This is a common practice, and I don't think that the business process is unreasonable.
1. Remove the special procurement key from the RWHS Material Master
2. Change Material Master in the RWHS to X procurement.
3. Set your RWHS Material Master 'Total Replenishment Lead time'
Next step assumes that the company codes are the same between RWHS and Manufacturing Plant.
4. Create Purchase Info Record for the RWHS material, that points to the vendor of the Manufacturing plant
5. Create quota arrangement in which 100 percent of the quota comes from the Manufacturing Plant Purchase Info Record, and is MRP relevant
6. Insert a step after the RWHS MRP run where the Planned orders are immediately converted to Purchase requisitions.
Business process:
a. Sales order is entered. ATP checks RWHS stock and excess inbound.
b. If inadequate supply, then ATP confirms to Total Replenishment Lead time (and not planned delivery time).
c. MRP runs; creates a planned order for the shortage.
d. New step in MRP job converts the Planned order to a Purchase req. Purchase req is sourced via the quota arrangement
e. Purchase Req requirement (Manufacturing plant) is offset by the Planned delivery time to accommodate transit duration.
f. Purchase req demand now places a requirement on the Manufacturing plant, with dates and quantities that will support the Sales order in the RWHS.
g. Convert the Purchase Req to a STO once the stock appears in the Manufacturing Plant.
Best Regards,
DB49

ATP For Inquiry VA 11

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for