ATP Inquiry in OM

I don;t have the APS modules installed, Can I still perform the ATP inquiry in 11i instance? Is the functionality the same as the one in the previous version.
Can I use the ATP rules to do inquiry at the Order Header level

Is there anything stuck in your Inventory transaction interface? (I assume you've checked this when you say you've looked at pending transactions).
Did the ITS for the shipped order(s) complete? Have you checked for any unprocessed stops in the ITS submission?
Are there any obvious anomalies for the item(s) concerned when you do an Inventory Supply/Demand query which might explain 'hidden' demand?
Do you have any uncancelled and unprocessed pick release allocations for the item(s) concerned (check the Release Sales Order form)?

Similar Messages

ATP Inquiry Supply/Demand

Running 11.5.9 Advanced Supply Chain Planner>>>ATP>>>ATP Inquiry. It would appear that this inquiry takes its supply and demand information from the ascp plan. Is this a correct assumption? If this is true is there anyway of this inquiry capturing supply that is created through the workday or do you always have to wait until the plan runs again?

Yes. The ATP Inquiry Form always takes information from the Plan. If there is any new supply created in the worday, you will have to wait till the Plan runs

ATP Inquiry

Running 11.5.9. Advanced Supply Chain Planner>>>ATP>>>ATP Inquiry. Choose an org. Enter an item and quantity and hit the ATP Details button. After data is returned with date looking to drill into the details. Right-click on item and see choices such as EXPAND, SUPPLY/DEMAND etc. However the SHOW CONSTRAINTS is not highlighted. Any thoughts??? Thanks in advance!

Hi
In OM module, you have to set up the instances too.The option ATP based on collected data will give the result for ATP inquiry for the OM whereas in APS you can get ATP inquiry based on planning output.In OM, you cannot see the component availability whereas you can see it in APS.
The ATP/CTP based planning ouput option is chosen if you are running a collection program in the ASCP module and a plan based on the collected data pulled ealier.In this case you have to define a plan and check ATP flag and define options and then run the plan.Then the option ATP/CTP based planning oputput will give you the output based on the above plan.Without that it is as same as the ATP based on collection data(as in OM).
Hope it helps.

Enable diagnostic in ATP inquiry ASCP

What does the enable diagnostic do if checked when performing an ATP inquiry in ASCP-land?
Thanks in advance

Please see these docs.
Getting ATP Inquiry Debug Files - The Session Files [ID 122372.1]
FAQ - How to Use Debug Tools and Scripts for the VCP (aka APS) and EBS Applications [ID 245974.1]
Getting Started With R12 - Advanced Planning and Scheduling (APS) - Support Enhanced RCD [ID 414332.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Can "ATP Inquiry" (Global Availability) works without GOP

Could anyone please tell me what are the GOP (or ASCP) functionalities we lose if we remove these modules?
Thanks,
Senthil

Right. That approach is the simplest. Or you can make an application Run Only by exporting it with that setting and importing/installing it leaving that setting as Run Only. Or you can export it with either setting and change the status to Run Only when you import/install it. Either way it makes the application un-editable by developers/workspace admins. You can also make the entire installation runtime-only where you don't even get an admin interface other than an API with which you can run to do administration. I think you have to use SQL*Plus or SQL Developer to install the applications in that situation.
Scott

ATP FUNCTIONALITY NOT WORKING CORRECTLY FOR ATO Model

Guru's,
Currently I am facing issue in ATP Inquiry to arrive at schedule ship date, we have set up an ATO Model and its low-level parts for multi level ATP, including ATP rules, item attributes, bom attributes, and lead times and ATP check is based on planned output and enabled 24X7 plan.
When try to perform ATP inquiry either from ASCP/OM responsibility, Instead of showing complete drill down of material constraint at the part level, it "stops" at the model level and shows no availability until the inifinte supply timefence, then unlimited availability after that.
I was earlier able to view the complete ATP pegging details with ATP dates well within ITF, but however when we re run the plan to include additional SO the above behavior is observed.
Can some one help me to reslove the issue, as I am not sure what exactly which is triggering this behavior.
Thanks,

Thanks for the reply, but this note was not addressing the above stated issue. In this note for matched configuration, they are not able to view pegging else they are able to perform multilevel atp check.
Can anyone help me to reslove this issue.
Thanks
Edited by: user604737 on Jun 18, 2011 4:48 AM
Edited by: user604737 on Jun 19, 2011 11:50 PM

Substitute components for ATP

Hi All,
I have substitute components set in BOM. Substitute component has enough excess onhand. ATP plan is considering component substitution whereever required to satisfy demand. But ATP inquiry is considering only primary component(if no supply for primary then its using primary component lead time even if substitute components have enough onhand). I have set MRP: Include Substitute Components profile option to yes. We are using 11.5.10.2.
Am i missing any setup?
Regards,
Deepak

Hi Deepak
Please try using 'Diagnostics ATP' to see why your request isn't being met on-time. It can be possible due to Lead Time or capacity issues and when these issues are resolved, you may already have primary components available.
Thanks
Navneet Goel

Same dates for GA and GR in ATP

Hi All,
This is my very first post. I have a situation where for an Inbound delivery. I should have 2 days difference in Goods arrival and goods receipt in plant. For some reason system is showing the same dates for Goods arrival and goods Receipt. Can someone help me what all tolook for?
Many thanks
YS

ATO Items/ Models have significant complex requirements and behavior when ATP check is called. While this is handled appropriately in ATP from OM interface, direct ATP Inquiry either from APS responsibility or similar form in OM--> Scheduling menu option.
I'll highly suggest not to use either of these ATP Inquiry forms for anything related to CTO (ATO, PTO etc) and only use OM UI for such availability checks. This is by design unless Oracle makes significant changes to how these forms are built, please note there is no configurator support from these 2 forms for similar reasons.
Thanks
Navneet Goel

Information needed on ATP functinality based on collected data.

Hi,
we need to use ATP fuctionality in some of our ASCP scenarios.
I have created FG items and components under them.
Created onhand for components.
Now if I do ATP inquiry for FG item , expecting it should give ATP quantity based on its component availabilty.
But it is showing 0 only for whatever quantities or dates i query for .
I had done setups like item ATP attributes,BOM check ATP,Profile option INV:Capable to promise based on collected data,Routing check CTP.
Can any one confirm me whether it is the way it works or I need to do any specific setup.
Thanks
Vasudha.

Hi
Do want to use priority based on demand class? The prioritization of ASCP is diffrent from demand class prioritization. You will need to have a customization to assign demand class based prioity and update the demand lines to respect it by ASCP .
Please try to use Allocated ATP . The use allocated ATP profile needs to be set to yes. There should be proper allcoation rule also setup based on demand class. But you cannot guarantee that the ASCP and ATP will be in sync
Thnx
partha

ATP across orgs

Hi,
Need a help in understanding ATP functionality in ASCP (unconstraint), please see example below.
Org 1
Item A , Item Type = Make to Order Item , Check ATP= Material Only ,ATP Components=Material Only , Forecast Control =Consume & Derive
Item B Item Type =Internal Buy, Check ATP= Material Only, ATP Components=Material Only, Forecast Control =None, Sourcing Rule = Transfer from Org 2
Org 2
Item B Item Type =Internal Make, Check ATP= Material Only, ATP Components=Material Only, Forecast Control =CONSUME &DERIVE
Item C Item Type = Buy, Check ATP= Material Only, ATP Components=Material Only
When we perform ATP Inquiry for Item A in Org 1 (there is no material On hand for Item A & B in Org1), ATP just looking materials in org 1 up to item B then it's returning date with Material Constraint with out looking material availability in Org 2, so it's not checking across orgs my testing shows it's due to Forecast Control =CONSUME &DERIVE set for Item B in Org 2.
I have similar items for which Forecast Control flag at Org 2 set to none; ATP is working fine by looking all supply in two orgs before returning ship date.
Since item B is forecasted using ODP in Org 2 we set flag to Consume & Derive but not understanding why it will stop ATP to look across orgs.
Please advice.
Thanks,
Sudhakar

Have you got your sourcing rules and sourcing rule assignments set up so they model your entire supply chain? Eg in the org from which you are selling from, you need have a rule which says something like buy from another org and in that other org you need a sourcing rule and assignment which states where that org gets it from. Eg buy from a supplier.
Also try ATP in trace mode (available from tools menu) and ATP with planned data (vs collected data).

Same available date...different displayed detail in ATP???

Have a configured ATO item. For the BOM Level 1 is the ATO item. Level 2 is a PH-1 which is an option phantom. Level 3 are comps that make up PH-1.
When I do an availability check in OM for Level 1 and look at the details I get a Material Constraint at PH-1…but don’t get the comp details in the PH-1 that is constrained.
If I go to Advanced Supply Chain Planner>>>ATP>>>ATP Inquiry to perform a check for the same ATO item the material constraint goes down to the component in Level 3. Why the different results?
ATP is based on Planning Data.

ATO Items/ Models have significant complex requirements and behavior when ATP check is called. While this is handled appropriately in ATP from OM interface, direct ATP Inquiry either from APS responsibility or similar form in OM--> Scheduling menu option.
I'll highly suggest not to use either of these ATP Inquiry forms for anything related to CTO (ATO, PTO etc) and only use OM UI for such availability checks. This is by design unless Oracle makes significant changes to how these forms are built, please note there is no configurator support from these 2 forms for similar reasons.
Thanks
Navneet Goel

OM 11i ATP Checking

I have questions regarding ATP checking in Order Management R11i. I have defined an item with Check ATP = Material only. The ATP Rule attached to this item has Infinite Supply = 15 days. There is no Supply or Demand for this item at this point.
When I perform Scheduling from the Sales Order form Availability Button, it indicates that the ordered qty is available even though there is no Supply.
However, when I perform an ATP Inquiry from the Inventory form - I do receive an ATP date which is 15 days into the future.
Does anyone have similar experiences with OM Scheduling functionality.
Thanks for your help.
Mike Kudo

1. Make sure you have run the ATP Data Collection as a complete refresh since creating or assigning or updating any ATP Rules.
2. Check the following defaulting rules:-
-Order Line, Schedule Ship Date = Related Record, Ship Set
- Order Header, Latest Acceptable Date = Constant Value, 500 (use whatever value you like but at least this will cover most cases). Null behaves as zero days and means that no schedule date is good enough.
- Run the 'Defaulting Generator' from OM (Run Requests) after updating these rules.
3. For the ATPable items, make sure that the ATP Components item attribute is set to 'No'. The system can get confused if this is wrong & give such unpredictable results.
4. Try the following system profile option setting:-
INV: Capable to Promise = Enable PL/SQL based ATP without Planning Output
5. What is the value of the OM: AutoSchedule profile option ... YES or NO ? From what you have described, I assume you are manually scheduling so this would be set to 'NO'.
This is based on having very recently set up a heavily patched 11.5.3 (more like 11.5.4) instance.

To Default Warehouse In Sales Order Based On GOP Results

Hi
The Business requirements are
During the import or manual entry of sales order,based on customer ship to address the warehouse field in the sales order should default from gop results.
Gop can show you the availability from the ATP inquiry form attached to sales order.But how to default or populate the warehouse field automatically.
No standard functionality is there.Enhancement request has been raised.Can anybody suggest any workaroounds.
Thanks

Take out the defaulting rules for Sales Order Line and the regular gop setups,the during scheduling it calls for the assignment set specified.and the warehouse field is populated.
by the rank one warehouse in the sourcing rule.

Global Order Promising query -- Action Code

This is regarding the GOP(11i ) , mrp_atp_pub_call parameter action code . As per the Oracle it has three values
Action: Type of Inquiry
100- ATP Inquiry
110- Scheduling
120 - Rescheduling
My ask is :
1. Do we per/Unpeg supplay demand or reservation when we pass differnet action code .If yes which action code perform what and how.
2. Apart from override flag( honoring ATP) , is there any parameter which can effect the supply demand picture with action code .
2. atp_call calls in turn call the Call_ATP_No_Commit , is this procedure is always called and do this procedure call depends on the action code .
3. In R12, is the similar functionality present .
Thanks in advance .

Hi Jaydev,
The "Send" option in the work item instance's dropdown is enabled a couple ways. As you pointed out, it is enabled if there is no logic or Screenflow associated with the Interactive activity. The second way that it is enabled is when you change the default property for the Interactive activity (right mouse click the Interactive activity -> "Properties" -> "Runtime") and uncheck the "Auto complete" property for the Interactive activity.
There's a very significant downside to doing this. This means that after completing the required tasks in the activity, instead of automatically going to the next activity in the process - the work item instance will instead stay in the activity. It will stay in the activity until an end user clicks "Send". Just a heads-up - end users will find this extra key click annoying.
Hope this helps,
Dan

ORA-55714: savepoint savepoint disabled with interleaved changes across..

We have a PL/SQL program that is called by OAF page and has savepoint logic used in it.
We are getting the below error when we call the OAF page.
***Error***
***ORA-01086: savepoint 'START_ATP' never established in this session or is invalid ORA-06512: at "APPS.XXMRPAVAIL", line 1061 ORA-55714: savepoint 'START_CALL_ATP' disabled with interleaved changes across Oracle RAC instances***
Below is the sample logic which we have written.
SAVEPOINT start_call_atp ;
MRP_ATP_PUB.Call_ATP_no_commit
(l_session_id,
l_atp_rec,
x_atp_rec ,
x_atp_supply_demand ,
x_atp_period,
x_atp_details,
x_return_status,
x_msg_data,
x_msg_count
ROLLBACK TO start_call_atp ;
Let me know for any additional information. Thanks in advance for your help.

Please find the complete code below.
PROCEDURE Call_ATP (p_sequence_id IN NUMBER
,p_requested_ship_date IN DATE
,p_mfg_source_code_list IN VARCHAR2
,p_plan_name IN VARCHAR2
,p_requested_quantity IN NUMBER DEFAULT 100000000
,p_debug_flag IN VARCHAR2 DEFAULT 'N'
,p_week_no IN NUMBER DEFAULT 0
,p_prodFamily_clause IN VARCHAR2
,p_typetabatp IN typetabatp_g
IS
-- If profile MSC: ATP Debug = Debug and Database Trace, it will only provide the Debug session file
-- So if tracing is desired, then Remove the -- from the 'ALTER SESSION ...' line below.
-- ALSO remove -- from 'ALTER SESSION ...' statement at the end of this file that turns trace off.
-- If you fail to turn off the trace then the resulting trace file cannot be analyzed properly
-- ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS = '10046 TRACE NAME CONTEXT FOREVER, LEVEL 12' ;
lv_program_name VARCHAR2(150) := gv_package_name || '.Call_ATP' ;
lv_message VARCHAR2(4000) ;
lv_resource_org_id NUMBER;
lv_resource_org_code VARCHAR(100);
l_atp_rec MRP_ATP_PUB.ATP_Rec_Typ;
p_atp_rec MRP_ATP_PUB.ATP_Rec_Typ;
x_atp_rec MRP_ATP_PUB.ATP_Rec_Typ;
x_atp_supply_demand MRP_ATP_PUB.ATP_Supply_Demand_Typ;
x_atp_period MRP_ATP_PUB.ATP_Period_Typ;
x_atp_details MRP_ATP_PUB.ATP_Details_Typ;
x_return_status VARCHAR2(2000);
x_msg_data VARCHAR2(500);
x_msg_count NUMBER;
l_session_id NUMBER;
l_error_message VARCHAR2(250);
x_error_message VARCHAR2(80);
v_file_dir VARCHAR2 (80);
i NUMBER := 0;
ln_quantity NUMBER := p_requested_quantity;
ld_request_ship_date DATE := p_requested_ship_date;
ln_instance_id NUMBER;
TYPE TypCurRef IS REF CURSOR ;
CurRef TypCurRef ;
lv_Cur VARCHAR2(32767) ;
atp_details_tab TypRecATPDetails;
atp_details_rec MRP_ATP_PUB.ATP_Rec_Typ;
lv_rep_item VARCHAR2(40);
lv_rep_item_id NUMBER;
lv_user_id NUMBER;
TYPE TypRecCur IS RECORD
(inventory_item_id NUMBER
,ItemNo VARCHAR2(30)
,source_whse_code VARCHAR2(30)
,source_organization_id NUMBER
,family VARCHAR2(150)
,demand_class VARCHAR2(30)
,family_order_by NUMBER
RecCur TypRecCur ;
ln_plan_id NUMBER ;
k NUMBER ;
s NUMBER := 0 ;
lv_prodFamily_clause VARCHAR2(32767);
BEGIN
SAVEPOINT start_ATP ;
lv_user_id := fnd_profile.value('USER_ID');
SELECT plan_id
INTO
ln_plan_id
FROM msc_plans@APS_DBLINK
WHERE compile_designator = p_plan_name ;
SELECT MAX(instance_id)
INTO
ln_instance_id
FROM apps.mrp_ap_apps_instances_all
WHERE NVL(a2m_dblink, 'APS_DBLINK') = 'APS_DBLINK';
MSC_ATP_GLOBAL.Extend_ATP(l_atp_rec, x_return_status, 1);
FOR x IN p_typetabatp.first .. p_typetabatp.last
LOOP
lv_rep_item := NULL;
lv_rep_item_id := NULL;
BEGIN
SELECT rep.rep_item,msib.inventory_item_id
INTO lv_rep_item, lv_rep_item_id
FROM xxmrp_ctp_rep_items rep,
mtl_system_items_b msib,
     org_organization_definitions ood
WHERE rep.plant_code = p_typetabatp(x).source_whse_code
AND rep.prod_family = p_typetabatp(x).Family
     AND msib.segment1 = rep.rep_item
     AND msib.organization_id = ood.organization_id
     AND ood.organization_code = rep.plant_code;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
lv_rep_item := NULL;
lv_rep_item_id := NULL;
END;
SELECT OE_ORDER_SCH_UTIL.Get_Session_Id
INTO l_session_id
FROM dual;
IF p_debug_flag <> 'N' THEN
order_sch_wb.mr_debug := 'Y' ;
order_sch_wb.file_or_terminal := 1 ;
order_sch_wb.debug_session_id := l_session_id;
FND_PROFILE.put('MSC_ATP_DEBUG', 'C');
SELECT xxau_util.getDefaultDirectory
INTO v_file_dir
FROM dual ;
order_sch_wb.file_dir := v_file_dir ;
END IF;
i := 1;
s := s + 1 ;
l_atp_rec.identifier(i) := -TO_NUMBER(TO_CHAR(p_sequence_id) || TO_CHAR(p_week_no) || TO_CHAR(s)) ;
l_atp_rec.Inventory_Item_Id(i) := nvl(lv_rep_item_id,p_typetabatp(x).Inventory_Item_Id) ;
l_atp_rec.vendor_name(i) := p_typetabatp(x).Family ;
l_atp_rec.Inventory_Item_Name(i) := NVL(lv_rep_item,p_typetabatp(x).ItemNo);
l_atp_rec.Quantity_Ordered(i) := ln_quantity;
l_atp_rec.Quantity_UOM(i) := 'Ea';
l_atp_rec.Requested_Ship_Date(i) := p_requested_ship_date;
l_atp_rec.Action(i) := 100; --ATP inquiry
l_atp_rec.Source_Organization_Id(i) := p_typetabatp(x).source_organization_id ;
l_atp_rec.OE_Flag(i) := 'N';
l_atp_rec.Insert_Flag(i) := 0;
l_atp_rec.Customer_Id(i) := null;
l_atp_rec.Customer_Site_Id(i) := null;
l_atp_rec.Calling_Module(i) := null;
l_atp_rec.Row_Id(i) := null;
l_atp_rec.Source_Organization_Code(i) := null;
l_atp_rec.Organization_Id(i) := null;
--l_atp_rec.demand_class(i)              := RecCur.demand_class;
l_atp_rec.demand_class(i) := p_typetabatp(x).demand_class;
l_error_message := null;
SAVEPOINT start_call_atp ;
MRP_ATP_PUB.Call_ATP_no_commit
(l_session_id,
l_atp_rec,
x_atp_rec ,
x_atp_supply_demand ,
x_atp_period,
x_atp_details,
x_return_status,
x_msg_data,
x_msg_count
ROLLBACK TO start_call_atp ;
IF (x_return_status = 'S') THEN
IF x_atp_rec.Inventory_item_id.count > 0 THEN
--============ Show capacity even if there is no supply/demand =======================================
FOR j IN 1..x_atp_rec.Inventory_item_id.count
LOOP
lv_resource_org_id := xxmrpavail.get_resource_org_id (x_atp_rec.Source_Organization_Id(j));
--lv_resource_org_code := xxmrpavail.get_resource_org_id (x_atp_rec.Source_Organization_Id(j));
IF SQL%ROWCOUNT = 0 THEN
IF atp_details_rec.Source_Organization_Id.count > 0 THEN
NULL;
ELSE
MSC_ATP_GLOBAL.Extend_ATP(atp_details_rec, x_return_status, 1);
END IF;
atp_details_rec.Source_Organization_Id(atp_details_rec.Source_Organization_Id.count) := x_atp_rec.Source_Organization_Id(j) ;
atp_details_rec.vendor_name(atp_details_rec.vendor_name.count) := x_atp_rec.vendor_name(j) ;
atp_details_rec.Requested_Date_Quantity(atp_details_rec.Requested_Date_Quantity.count) := x_atp_rec.Requested_Date_Quantity(j) ;
atp_details_rec.Error_Code(atp_details_rec.Error_Code.count) := x_atp_rec.Error_Code(j) ;
atp_details_rec.Inventory_Item_Name(atp_details_rec.Inventory_Item_Name.count) := x_atp_rec.Inventory_Item_Name(j) ;
END IF;
END LOOP;
IF atp_details_rec.Inventory_Item_Name.count > 0 THEN
--custom logic
END IF;
END IF;
ELSE
RAISE e_ErrATP ;
END IF; -- after calling api
l_error_message := '';
l_session_id := '' ;
x_return_status := '' ;
x_msg_data := '' ;
x_msg_count := '' ;
END LOOP; -- main loop
EXCEPTION
WHEN e_ErrATP THEN
--IF CurRef%ISOPEN THEN CLOSE CurRef ; END IF;
IF x_atp_rec.Error_Code.count > 0 AND (x_atp_rec.Error_Code(1) <> 0) THEN
SELECT meaning
INTO x_error_message
FROM mfg_lookups
WHERE lookup_type = 'MTL_DEMAND_INTERFACE_ERRORS'
AND lookup_code = x_atp_rec.Error_Code(1);
lv_message := lv_message || x_error_message ;
END IF;
xxau_util.log(lv_program_name, 'SQLERROR', lv_message, xxau_util.c_TraceLevelException) ;
raise_application_error(c_ErrATP,'ERROR: ' || lv_program_name || ': ' || lv_message) ;
WHEN OTHERS THEN
--IF CurRef%ISOPEN THEN CLOSE CurRef ; END IF;
ROLLBACK TO start_ATP;
lv_message := lv_message || substr(SQLERRM,1,4000) ;
xxau_util.log(lv_program_name, 'SQLERROR', lv_message, xxau_util.c_TraceLevelException) ;
raise_application_error(c_ErrGeneric,'ERROR: ' || lv_program_name || ': ' || lv_message) ;
END Call_ATP;

ATP Inquiry in OM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for