Audio bit rate (kbps) and file size balance

I'm new to Flash, and I'm trying to decide how to set the bit
rate (kbps) for my audio files.
I'm creating PowperPoint-like presentations with voice audio.
You can see what I'm doing at
http://preparatorychemistry.com/Bishop_Audio_Book.htm
I first decided on 16 kbps, but I'm not happy with how it
sounds, especially through headphones connected to the computer. My
presentations, of course, sound better with higher bit rates, but
file sizes roughly double for each doubling of the bit rate. At 16
kbps, my files range from 1-3 MB, so for 32 kbps (which I'm leaning
toward now), they are 2-6 MB. My questions are
What's the concensus on the best bit rate for Internet sound
files, especially voice?
How important is it to minimize files size? The files are
already large enough so that dial-up folks will probably not listen
to them, and even the larger files seem to download fast enough
with my cable connection.
Thanks for the help.
Mark

Chemistry guy wrote:
> I'm new to Flash, and I'm trying to decide how to set
the bit rate (kbps) for
> my audio files.
>
> I'm creating PowperPoint-like presentations with voice
audio. You can see what
> I'm doing at
>
>
http://preparatorychemistry.com/Bishop_Audio_Book.htm
>
> I first decided on 16 kbps, but I'm not happy with how
it sounds, especially
> through headphones connected to the computer. My
presentations, of course,
> sound better with higher bit rates, but file sizes
roughly double for each
> doubling of the bit rate. At 16 kbps, my files range
from 1-3 MB, so for 32
> kbps (which I'm leaning toward now), they are 2-6 MB. My
questions are
>
> What's the concensus on the best bit rate for Internet
sound files, especially
> voice?
The best is the import high quality sound in wav format. Than
in library you can
play around with m3p compression changing the rates and all.
Checking the quality
versus the file size and find one that suit your needs. There
is no BEST format to
import. Every single fill have individual setting. It's all
depends on the sound.
Like, in case of voice. Very different to other sounds.
Save it as ADPCM (adaptive pulse code modulation) or Mp3
9kbps as your second choice.
Also take note that STREAM always lower down the quality , it
suppose to load fast so flash reduce
it enormously , usually sound like pure crap, go to library
(CTRL L to open) right click your sound
and go to properties, adjust the compression and type of
audio format to find best size and quality...
> How important is it to minimize files size? The files
are already large enough
> so that dial-up folks will probably not listen to them,
and even the larger
> files seem to download fast enough with my cable
connection.
You would be surprised. I was doing voice overs two or 3
weeks ago for a client.
Needed 5 sounds , up to two minutes each, for different
slides. Ranging from 2.5 MB
to 2.9 MB per file.
After compressing all of them, I had 5 sounds in very good
quality of total size 1.4 MB
Best Regards
Urami
<urami>
If you want to mail me - DO NOT LAUGH AT MY ADDRESS
</urami>

Similar Messages

  • IPOD Classic Which Video Audio bit Rate?

    I recently purchased some software for converting movie files and non protected dvds to my ipod. The software companies support told me that the maximum audio bit rate for for video files is 56kb/s for ipod 30gb and 64kb/s for ipod 60gb. Now i know i haven't got these models, i have the classic but they still told me i can convert to 64kb/s in the audio bit rate for video files before convertion. Can someone please clarify this. The software does support however a maximum audio bit rate of 320kb/s for video files. I was going to use 128 or 160.
    I found this link but it only explains as far as aac-lc:
    http://www.apple.com/ipodclassic/specs.html

    I just found something else out though, my conversion software maxes out at 160kb/s. So the iPod may support more, I don't know anymore. I still think the max is 160kb/s though, because that's all I could find when looking for it.

  • How do I adjust audio bit rate in MPEG-2 Program Stream?

    I don't see any way to adjust the audio bit rate in the MPEG-2 Program Stream setting in Compressor 3.5.3.  I need a specific bit rate of 224 KBps within an MPEG 1 Layer 2.
    Thank you.

    AFIAK, there is no way within the preset adjustments to change the audio – either in 3.5 or 4.0
    Try this for a work-around. Choose the MPG-1 setting, open Inspector and disable Video. Adjust the audio rate to 224 in the Audio tab. Submit and you should get an audio stream. In a separate job choose the MPEG-2 settings. Open the Inspector>Encoder Tab>Extras and deselect multiplex. Submit and Compressor should spit out an MPEG-2 video stream. You should be able to multiplex them in Mpeg Streamclip. (The files need  to have the exact same name prior to their respective extensions.)
    Good luck.
    Russ

  • Audio bit rate

    Does anyone know how to change the audio bit rate in
    Captivate 4? The Advanced Audio Management screen shows the bit
    rate at 256kbps. I'd like to change that to 128 to see if it
    reduced my file size but cannot find where to do that anywhere.
    Please help!!!!

    Welcome to our community, Mike
    Click Edit > Preferences > Project node > SWF Size
    and Quality node.
    There you will find a slider control.
    You may also wish to examine clicking Audio > Settings...
    Cheers... Rick

  • Pixel Dimensions and File Size

    Can anybody please explain the relation between pixel dimensions and file size?
    Being naive, (or straight-forward if you prefer) I had assumed that pixel dimensions wide times pix dimension high = file size. Wrong!
    For instance a .JPG file 374 X 500 has a file size of 41,275 bytes. But 374 times 500 = 18,700 so the two are different issues.

    Thanks Rich. It kind of sounds like you know something about this.
    I see 1 pixel, and 24 bit color would make 24 bits at 8 bits to a byte, so there's the 3 bytes.
    I selected a certain photo and used the APPLE i command to see if could find if it had 8 bit color or, whatever. That infomation was not on the info function, but it did say something about RGB color profile.
    Is 8 bit color a near certain bet in most applications, or was that just for the sake of illustration?
    I Googled 8 bit color and go to a Wikipedia Article
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_depth
    which explained a lot, but its more technical depth than what I'm prepared to deal with. The net net, as far as I can tell is that image size (before compression) is dimension times color depth in its native mode, but I suppose what the native mode is and what the displayed mode is could be separate issues?
    I was under the impression that the compression in JPG formt files comes out, or is decompressed, when the photo is printed or displayed? No?

  • Shedding light on export settings and file size

    I am trying to learn about exporting images and file size. I have a combination of RAW and JPEG images in my library. For the sake of this discussion, I am going to limit this to JPEG's. I need to export my images, so that I can then upload them to an external photo processing site like Kodak.com. I was going to export versions of my images because I have made adjustments to many of them. I was going to choose the top level preset of "JPEG - original size." For the sake of example, the file that I try exporting this way has a file size (in Aperture) of 1.94 MB. After exporting it (with a DPI of 72) and a color profile of sRGB IEC61966-2.1 (I am not sure what the significance of the DPI and color profiles are either), I get an exported image with a file size of 4.6 MB. When I export the master image, I get a file size of 2.0 MB. I'm completely confused and at a loss as to what is going on here.
    Can someone please shed some light on how to go about exporting images so that I can be certain that I am exporting the best quality image possible.
    Also, and possibly more importantly, I export image files to sites like MobileMe Galler, Flikr and Phanfare, etc, for the purpose of archiving my images and now I am not sure if the files I am exporting are of the optimal most quality they can be. Do these settings have any bearing on the images that are being sent to my archival folders?
    Thanks in advance for any input on this important topic.
    Mac

    This confusion is because of the way Jpg files handle data. Jpg is a kind of file that compresses data to achieve a balance between image quality and file size. The jpg file that your camera saves to disk is also compressed, that's why the difference in size between a 2 MB jpg and the same image in Raw is for example 18 MB.
    Jpg is a lossy compression format, every time you save a jpg some compression is applied, say after editing in Photoshop. Aperture must be reading your jpg masters to export jpg files to disk, so the difference in size should be the compression quantity applied to the newly created jpg file. I could have a 1 MB jpg file previously compressed with a quality level of 7, but if I export it at a compression quality of 10, the file could easily become a 2 MB file. The problem is quality doesn't increase with file size when the original file is a jpg.
    Also some files include a preview image inside the file, increasing the final file size. The color profile embedded should't increase size by much, since most camera jpg files already include a color profile embedded (color profiles tells computers to display color consistently between applications and peripherals like printers. sRGB is widely used for images published on Internet).
    As for the images you are sending to the archival folder, I would suggest you to export the masters, instead of exporting a new jpg file from an already compressed jpg master.
    I know this is a complex subject so I hope I haven't confused you.

  • InDesign Transparency Effects - Problems with Image Quality and File Size

    Hello,
    We are experiencing new problems exporting InDesign files to PDF.
    To summarize, though our largest workflow is to create files for offset printing, we also deliver our work to PDF for mounting on a website so our clients can download directly from the web. Our new problem is Transparency Effects, and creating a PDF that will both have a high quality (or resolution), and be a small file size.
    We are working with multiple page documents (24 to 48 pages), and would very much like to work with InDesign Transparency Effects. However, after spending much time testing a variety of PDF types, we are finding there is a radical difference between quality and file size. I was curious if anyone has had these problems, and if there is a simple answer. InDesign is an incredible program that allows us to design on the fly with Transparency Effects, but, if we are going to experience these problems, we will have to eliminate these wonderful tools.
    Can you help me or lead me to information online that will help.
    Thank you,
    Lain

    Please don't post in multiple forums. Your question has nothing to do with the PDF language and specifications, but rather PDF workflow or InDesign. I've responded to your other posting and am closing this thread.
    - Dov

  • I print 2 pages to pdf and file size is 600k, I print 1 additonal page and file size goes to 6M, what would cause this (graphics are same on all pages)

    I print 2 pages to pdf and file size is 600k, I print 1 additonal page and file size goes to 6M, what would cause this (graphics are same on all pages).
    I know the colour graphic shading in the document that causes the issue of larger file size, but it doesn't make sense that printing 1 additional page with same information as first 2 pages would cause this.

    I print 2 pages to pdf and file size is 600k, I print 1 additonal page and file size goes to 6M, what would cause this (graphics are same on all pages).
    I know the colour graphic shading in the document that causes the issue of larger file size, but it doesn't make sense that printing 1 additional page with same information as first 2 pages would cause this.

  • Correct MP3 parameters for minimize lossy-ness and file size

    Hi folks,
    Correct MP3 parameters for minimize lossy-ness so as to miminize file size.
    I am given a voice recording file in 32k sample rate and bit depth = 16. On spectral frequency display I see that there is not much useful data beyond 3200Hz, which I can ignore.
    If I change the sample rate to 11025, frequency range is about 5000Hz which adequately holds the valid range. Now my question is do I lose anything by downsampling the data? Does the downsampling alters some data in the 0-4000Hz range?
    My second question is the default option while saving in .mp3 for a file with 11025 sample rate would be 32 Kbps, 11025 Hz. do I gain any quality by encoding to a higher say in 40Kbps or more? What is a best MP3 encoding option for voice only recordings.
    Is MP3 more lossy than ACM/ADPCM?
    Another off topic question-- Can I find a particular sound? Suppose I see a particular noise and selects that and take corrective measures now I would like to find out any other occurances of that type of noise in the whole file. I understand that exact match is not possible but can I search to find out somewhat similar sounds?
    best wishes to you all,
    Deeptish

    If I change the sample rate to 11025, frequency range is about 5000Hz which adequately holds the valid range. Now my question is do I lose anything by downsampling the data? Does the downsampling alters some data in the 0-4000Hz range?
    In theory, no. If you use a lousy resampling method you will achieve some intermodulation distortion, however Auditions sample rate conversion process is pretty on the dot.
    Is MP3 more lossy than ACM/ADPCM?
    Yes/No. MP3 and ADPCM (adaptive differential pulse-code modulation) are two vastly different technologies (incidently, the ACM simply stands for Audio Compression Manager, and simply means it's an ADPCM codec for Windows). ADPCM is based off PCM and works in the time-domain. It uses dynamic compression to reduce the dynamic range so the audio is able to be mapped to an 8-bit resolution without excessive quantization noise. Upon playback/decoding, the signal is expanded. The process is far from lossless, however, A-law and μ-law have been telecom stanards of ADPCM for carrying voice traffic for years.
    My second question is the default option while saving in .mp3 for a file with 11025 sample rate would be 32 Kbps, 11025 Hz. do I gain any quality by encoding to a higher say in 40Kbps or more? What is a best MP3 encoding option for voice only recordings.
    MP3 is an entirely different game. Unlike ADPCM which works on the signal in the time-domain...MP3 processes an stores it's audio in the frequency domain and using physcoacoustic models, removes information from the frequency domain to reduce the number of bits needed to store the audio. The frequency response of an MP3 is determined more by the bitrate than the samplerate. A MP3 that's about 55kbps VBR sampled at 22khz only has a frequency response of 7.5khz, however, that doesn't mean the audio less than 7.5 khz hasn't been modified. Physcoacoustics work over the entire signal, the higher frequencies are the first to go since physcoacoustics figure we'll miss them less...but it does remove audio from the signal in many other bands as well. Sample rate does play a role...some bitrates are not available for specific sampling rates; since a 64kbps file might have 8khz of bandwidth, it's deemeed "too much" for 11khz and is not a valid rate. A 128kbps mp3 using 44.1 and a 128kbps mp3 using 32khz will generally have about the same range of spectral response....save for newer encoders that can squeeze a couple of muddy khz in there.  A 32kbps mp3, in practice, is acceptable for voice, there should be about 4khz of available bandwith, higher bitrates will naturally give you better quality.
    Basically, either MP3 or ADPCM are lossy formats, they're just radically different implmentations of audio compression with thier own sets of advantages and disadvantages.

  • Figuring out what audio bit-rate I filmed at?

    I started making DV movies in 2003. I am not sure what the audio setting was (probably the default 12 bit). My camera is a Sony DCR-TRV33. Is there some way I can determine what the setting is on the miniDV tapes before I capture it with FCE? That way I can make sure I get the right speed. Could I use Image Capture to grab a small section of tape and open Quicktime Player and see if I can see what the characteristics are? Thanks.

    When I open the viewfinder and play my first miniDV it says 16-bit; but I don't believe that that is correct. I don't believe I made any changes to the camera when I first got it. I hope R. Mitchell Fore is correct and that FCE will tell me if the captured bit rate does not match the camera.

  • Low bit rate 4k offline files

    I'm editing 4k on a 720p timeline.  Its a bit slow and painful.  Is there any advantage to making offline files that are still 4k but lower bit rate?  (so that I can still do the crazy 3x zooms!)
    (I suspect the limitation on my system is more processor than hard drive.  Its a xeon 3560x @3.6ghz, 12gb ram and a 7-drive raid5)

    Thanks both!  I read that page Ann.  It doesn't help me work out how to deal with zooming images (like if I pan and scan and then replace footage ill need to modify the pan and scan).  The problem is I have mixed 4k and 1080 on the same timeline. I only need the 4k reduced in size

  • Audio Bit Rate & Timeline Syncing

    If I shoot video that captures 16-bit audio and I use the Sound Devices 702 recorder and I record audio for the same shoot at 24-bit, is there going to a syncing issue in the FCP Timeline?

    The bit rate has nothing to do with sync.  Video is driven by a control track, 60 little clicks per second (50 in PAL.) The various conventions for naming those clock ticks (drop frame and non-drop frame) is called timecode.  The society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers came up with a standard:  SMPTE time code.  This is in wide, almost universal use.
    Unless the audio device is running on the SAME clock, either jamming code from one device to the other, or separately, providing sync with a clapper slate or some other visual and audible cue, you will have sync drift.  Period.  The end.  There is no fine print.
    You MIGHT have success with short recordings.  Or not.

  • SEQUENCE SETTING: Audio Bit Rate

    Is there any way to get 24-bit audio in a sequence or project setting?  We see no option to create a 24-bit project or 24-bit sequence in Premiere Pro CC.
    We recently made the jump over from FCP 7 to Premiere Pro CC and we are hoping this is an ‘audio works differently in Premiere’ issue.
    We have been editing ProRes (422HQ) as that is how our broadcast clients require final delivery. We edit with ProRes (HQ) files with 24-bit audio. We have also have attempted to create a sequence based on the clip settings. We figured everything is working as expected...we also get our final mix from our audio designer 24-bit.
    However, when we are ready to deliver our mixed master, we go to 'Export Media', and attempt to send out our sequence via 'Match Sequence Settings', as we want the specs we set up. BUT, Premiere reveals to us the audio is 16-bit (even though 24-bit audio is in the timeline). Yes, if it’s unchecked we can create a custom 24-bit preset. But that's like dubbing a dub, losing resolution (to put audio in video terms), and bumping it back up. As if Premiere is currently converting our 24-bit audio to 16-bit in our sequence, thus forcing us to convert a lower quality audio (16-bit) from the timeline, back to 24-bit for the exported master?
    This seems like it would be detrimental to the quality of our audio delivery and our standards.  How can we use the original 24-bit audio file from our designer? Why does the Match Sequence Setting say our audio is 16-bit when it is not?
    Can we adjust the audio settings in Premiere Pro CC project or sequences to reflect a 24-bit audio.
    Thanks in advance!

    Exactly..
    So how do I ensure the 24-bit audio in my sequence is being used properly...the Match Sequence Setting (which I don't use) is saying my sequence is 16-bit, and that's deceiving if it's not...Why would Premiere 'think' that, especially when we have only 24-bit audio files in the timeline and project.
    The MS Setting drop down menu is not giving me the trust of what is natively in my timeline, when it's displaying it's 16-bit. Therefore, it's not giving us the confidence Premiere is handling my audio correctly...How do I know Premiere is using my 24-bit audio during that manual export?...cause to me, Premiere's thinking it's 16-bit.
    Is it downgrading the audio int the timeline? And am I bumping it back up when I do it manually? That's not good, and unacceptable for broadcast.
    Hope that was understandable.
    Thanks!

  • Animated GIF--Quality and File Size

    I'm having a hard time getting a quality image and a decent file size.
    Even if I save animated GIFs and open with PE an try to resave them, the motion is choppy and the file size is more than double the original.
    For example, the following image is less than 10K and plays quite smoothely, but no way can I duplicate such a simple graphic under 10K:
    http://thequackshack.com/forums/radio/style_images/Borderli-546/ad_banner.gif
    It also seems that others can control the duration of frames individually...
    Most of my GIFs end up around 300K, which will not be accepted. A compromise of poor quality will also not be considered.
    What can I do?
    I've tried lowering Dither and colors, but the results are poor. My graphics will not be used if they are so large or of poor quality.
    Here is a couple that I made:
    http://thequackshack.com/forums/radio/uploads/post-176-1135532612.gif
    http://thequackshack.com/forums/radio/uploads/post-176-1135723565.gif
    PSE3, WinXP Pro

    Cuc
    I am not an animation expert, but I copied two of your examples. On the example you say is under 10K, there are about 35 layers. On your example there are about 65 layers. I'm wondering if reducing the number of layers would get you what you want.
    As for controlling duration of frames, I assume you want Frame 1 to be 0.5 second, Frame 2 to be 1 second etc. I think PSE puts a uniform time between frames. This can be adjusted, but it is adjusted all frames. One workaround I've seen is to copy a layer. So if the timing interval is 0.5 seconds, you would have the same image show for 0.5 seconds X 2 = 1 second.
    This is about all I know on animated GIFS.

  • Dynamic File Name and File size

    Hi All
    I need some help in calling Dynamic File Name and Dynamic File size of a file in my adapter Module.
    Could you please provided some help on the same?
    I have tried the same through UDF it is working. Could anyone provide me the steps for the same
    Regards
    Abhishek Mahajan

    Hi,
    You can use the already available adapter module "DynamicConfigurationBean". Have this adapter module at the top of the module list in CC.
    Have the parameter value as insert http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File FileName and http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File SourceFileSize (corresponding to the key names)
    For more info:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/45/da2239feb22e98e10000000a155369/frameset.htm
    There is also a SAP note available for the same....dont remember the note number:(.....
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

Maybe you are looking for