Aur packages should be maintained by multiple user

just like wiki............
the reason you can think out.

As Allan said, you don't want this. There are plenty of messy AUR packages already - you don't want to make that worse .
Useless topic > lock.

Similar Messages

  • AUR package that depends on pyglet

    I maintain the PsychoPy package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/psychopy/). PsychoPy is an applicaiton written for python2 and an upcoming release will depend on the 1.2 alpha version of pyglet. The community repository already has python2-pyglet (https://www.archlinux.org/packages/comm … n2-pyglet/), but it is version 1.1.4 of pyglet. The AUR has pyglet-hg (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyglet-hg/) and python-pyglet-hg (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pyglet-hg/) which both pull in the correct version of pyglet, but for Python3.
    I would be willing to maintain a python2-pyglet1.2alpha (or possibly python2-pyglet-hg) package, but not sure if adding another pyglet package to the mess is really beneficial. Further, the same source of pyglet is used for both python2 and python3, so it seems like maybe the current AUR package should be a split package. Finally, all the packages "provde" pyglet and hence conflict with each other, but it is not clear to me why a python2 package should conflict with a python3 package. Is there a reason for this?

    You can specify in dmenu-hg's PKGBUILD the minimal version of libdraw-hg's pkgver
    depends=(..."libdraw-hg>=1000"...) (for example)
    so that makepkg, if it sees an older version installed (for example, 999) it will demand a newer one, so the user will update libdraw-hg
    Last edited by flamelab (2010-09-13 14:02:06)

  • Restrict multiple users

    Hi Friends,
    Ours is OLAP system (10g Rel 2) . I have a package where in I populate a core table based on many working tables. I query the 4 working tables using a ref cursor and populate the data into an associative array and then looping through this array I populate the core table. Every time when I run this package I truncate the core table and repopulate it with the new data.
    Actually this package should run for a single user and multiple users cannot run this. But even if multiple users run, it should not affect the data getting populated into the core table.
    How do we handle this? Does Oracle internally handle this if multiple users run the same package??
    Thanks
    Zara

    user523372 wrote:
    Hi Friends,
    Ours is OLAP system (10g Rel 2) . I have a package where in I populate a core table based on many working tables. I query the 4 working tables using a ref cursor and populate the data into an associative array and then looping through this array I populate the core table. Every time when I run this package I truncate the core table and repopulate it with the new data.
    Actually this package should run for a single user and multiple users cannot run this. But even if multiple users run, it should not affect the data getting populated into the core table.
    How do we handle this? Does Oracle internally handle this if multiple users run the same package??
    Thanks
    ZaraIf this "core table" were a Global Temporary Table, you would have the desired characteristics.
    Any regular table does not do as desired.
    BTW - On the surface this sound like a non-scalable, inefficient, & brute force implementation.
    Edited by: sb92075 on Jul 5, 2011 4:28 PM

  • Triggering a sub work flow for multiple users at same time.

    I have a scenario in which I have created sub workflow as an activity for approval process. This sub work flow should be triggered for multiple users at the same time and their decison is independent of each other.
    This is like creating multipe instance of the same sub work flow and then the sub work flow runs indepedently as a new work flow for each of the approver and the process is completeded for approver independently.
    How can this be achieved?

    Tyr to do like this,
    1. First include the subworkflow in the main workflow template.
    2. Now include standard Block Step in the main workflow template.
    3. In the block select the block type as ParForEach.
    4. Before doing the 3rd point make sure that all the agents for whom you want whom you want to initiate the workflow, populate them in a Multiline conatiner element.
    5. Once completing 3rd and 4th points open the block step under the tab ParallelProcessing  assign the multiline container element name in the   for e;g if the multi line container element name is COSTCENTER then do the binding like below. the conatiner element COSTCENTERLINE is created by default once you include the multi line conatiner element under parller processing tab.
    &COSTCENTER[&_WF_PARFOREACH_INDEX&]&   -------->     &_COSTCENTER_LINE&
    Now assign the agent of the subworkflow as COSTCENTERLINE , imean if suppose you have 3 entries in the internal table then three separate and for three different agents the workflow is instantiated.

  • Multiple Users per Application

    Hi there,
    I got the following problem. We want to install/run an application via java ws that should be used by multiple users. So we want to install it once with a admin user and all the other users should be able to run it without installing it themselves. At the moment every user completely installs the client.
    Is there any way in solving this?

    yes, you will need to make use of the system cache and import feature in java web start 5.0
    http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/javaws/developersguide/javaws.html
    javaws -system -import ...
    to install web start applications into the system cache.
    configure the system cache via deployment properties file: (deployment.system.cachedir)
    http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/deployment/deployment-guide/properties.html

  • How to disable Refresh,Reload in browser and user should not allow to multiple browser sessions ?

    Dear All,
    How to disable Refresh,Reload in browser and end user should not allow to multiple browser sessions in portal.Where we need to configure the settings or any code in masthead or any other component. My server version is 7.4 - SP5 .Please help us.
    Thanks for advance,
    BR,
    Durga Rao.

    Dear all,
    i am able to logoff the click refresh button on keyboard.I am using this code to log off the user into the portal.
    document.onkeydown = function(e)
      var key;
      if (window.event) key = event.keyCode
      else
      var unicode = e.keyCode ? e.keyCode : e.charCode
      key = unicode
      switch (key)
      { //event.keyCode
      case 116: //F5 button
        LSAPI.sessionPlugin.logoff();
      event.returnValue = false;
      key = 0; //event.keyCode = 0;
      return false;
      case 82: //R button
      if (event.ctrlKey)
    LSAPI.sessionPlugin.logoff();
      event.returnValue = false;
      key = 0; //event.keyCode = 0;
      return false;
      case 91: // ctrl + R Button
    LSAPI.sessionPlugin.logoff();
      event.returnValue= false;
      key=0;
      return false;
    Thanks.
    But i am unable to control the multiple windows opening the browser.So any one can tell me the how to block the new window and new tab/duplicate tab option.
    BR,
    Durga Rao.

  • How to inspect AUR package PKBUILD and .install files

    Hi,
    Linux and arch newbie here. I was reading the wiki article about the AUR and noticed this bit:
    Warning: Carefully check all files. cd to the newly created directory and carefully check the PKGBUILD and any .install file for malicious commands. PKGBUILDs are bash scripts containing functions to be executed by makepkg: these functions can contain any valid commands or Bash syntax, so it is totally possible for a PKGBUILD to contain dangerous commands through malice or ignorance on the part of the author. Since makepkg uses fakeroot (and should never be run as root), there is some level of protection but you should never count on it. If in doubt, do not build the package and seek advice on the forums or mailing list.
    This is something that have not been doing at all in the past, but I am trying to improve my practices managing my system.
    The problem is, I do not know what exactly I am looking at or for in these files. If I give these files a look over before installing the package, can I honestly expect to spot something malicious? What would I need to learn to notice if something was fishy?
    Anyway, I am not to worried about this practically, because I only use a handful of AUR packages and I usually install ones based on recommendations, not just at random. But it still seemed interesting for the wiki to stress this so strongly. How important is this guidline anyway?
    Thanks!
    [EDIT: spelling]
    Last edited by supernerd (2014-06-25 10:41:13)

    I scan the whole PKGBUILD. I start by ensuring that the source link to the original source looks accurate. For example, take the source line for gmusicbrowser-git:
    source=("${pkgname}::git+http://github.com/squentin/gmusicbrowser.git")
    I know this is the correct link to the source, and so it passes my check. But suppose it had said:
    source=("${pkgname}::git+http://youvebeenhackedhub.com/1337haxorz/gmusicbrowser.git")
    I would become suspicious. Of course this is an exaggeration, but common sense goes a long ways here. At least check the first time..
    With the source verified, I ensure that the md5sum or sha256sum block has a sum. This way, if a download is compromised at the source, the sha256 or md5sum can catch it before you installed (this assumes that the PKGBUILD is not "bad" and has the sum number of a package that wasnt compromised). Note that with git this isnt necessary (the git process protects against such problems). Anytime a tarball is downloaded and extracted however, the sums should be present in the PKGBUILD. If I go to install an AUR package that has 'SKIP' for the md5sum/sha256sum block, I will double or triple check the source of the tarball (or of the patch files enclosed in the build directory, etc..)
    I also look for any "dangerous" commands in the build and install sections. For example, if I see "rm -rf" I had better see something like $pkgdir to start the directory path or be VERY sure the path is "safe". Since makepkg is not run as root this should theoretically not be a problem, but imagine if someone put "rm -rf /home/*" (warning: do not run that command on your system!) in there! This is mostly common sense; in time as you get more comfortable with bash and various linux commands it will make more and more sense and you will be able to spot mistakes.
    Also, consider the user posting the pkgbuild. "Trusted Users" are selected as trustworthy members of the community, so obviously you can feel much more comfortable with PKGBUILDS they have made (Xyne comes to mind..). For people you may not know, check what other PKGBUILDs they have available. After awhile, you develop a trust for certain people whos PKGBUILDs or software you have used. For example, I wouldnt hesitate to build/install using a PKGBUILD put up by BurntSushi since I use some of his software, have personally corresponded with him, and find him to be responsible. You might "develop" such rapport with other AUR users I dont even know about.
    Consider the vote count of a package as an approximate metric. Dont discount a package because it has 0 votes- it may just be that not many people have use for that particular software. Ive considered hosting a PKGBUILD for "xfce4-terminal-nowindowhints"; consider that tilers generally ignore them anyway, and that my package would only be useful for someone literally using xfce4-terminal with pytyle. How high do you think the vote count would be (even if the PKGBUILD had 0 errors)? On the other hand, you at least have a good chance the PKGBUILD is solid if the package has 354 people voting for it.. That said, the package could have been well-maintained before (when it received a ton of votes), and the quality has dropped since- just be mindful of these trends.
    Finally, adding all of these things together will leave the odds of a malicious PKGBUILD affecting your system pretty slim, though its certainly not impossible. I have never (to my knowledge to be fair) encountered a malicious PKGBUILD, though I have found a few that had errors or outdated sources, etc.
    Last edited by GSF1200S (2014-06-29 10:13:50)

  • [SOLVED] What are Git-type AUR packages?

    I read the ArchWiki Entry on Git, but I still don't really understand what it is in terms of Aur packages.
    I've seen this a couple of times, where there's a second git version of a package in AUR. For example, when I type 'prey' into Yaourt, I get a couple of results, among them:
    3 aur/prey-git 20100424-1 (5)
        Prey is a lightweight application that will help you track and find your laptop if it ever gets stolen.
    4 aur/prey-tracker 0.6.0-1 (100)
        Remote tracking and monitoring application for laptops, smartphones, and other electronic devices
    Either would install Prey on my computer, right? What are the differences and/or benefits of either?
    Last edited by Winston-Wolfe (2013-06-06 11:11:27)

    https://aur.archlinux.org/
    Statistics
    Packages     42851
    Orphan Packages     9729
    Packages added in the past 7 days     126
    Packages updated in the past 7 days     1052
    Packages updated in the past year     17219
    Packages never updated     10679
    Registered Users     46348
    Trusted Users     34
    x33a wrote:As someone mentioned on the forums recently, people should at least abandon the packages so others can take over.
    You can always e-mail the maintainer and if you don't get a response in two weeks, ask on the AUR ML to take that package over.
    In the meantime you can post a link to the updated PKGBUILD etc. in comments on the AUR page of that package.
    As with my posts, quantity != quality ;P

  • Rewrite of aur package tor-browser-en

    Hi,
    some months ago I packaged tor-browser-en [1] and, until now, just bumped the package version. Today I tried to rewrite it's PKGBUILD and wrapper script to increase security. I want tor-browser to be installed in ~/ instead of /opt (where it's installed currently). I do not want tor-browser to store it's data and temporary files somewhere else than my encrypted home directory.
    To clarify: tor-browser's files need to be owned by the user running it, otherwise it won't work. Adjusting permissions for group-writing did not work.
    I borrowed the wrapper script from the jdownloader package and customized it to fit tor-browser's needs. There are still some issues and I'm still trying to get automatic signature checking to work (especially automatic key fetching).
    Did I miss anything? Is there anything absolutely wrong? Please, if possible, test and tell me what you found:
    http://khg-08.de/max/tor-browser-en-2.2 … src.tar.gz
    Just the wrapper script on pastebin: http://pastebin.com/HMEBJua1
    [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53169 (old version)
    Last edited by Maxr (2012-03-10 21:23:28)

    Maxr wrote:That's what the wrapper script does. It will download the source archive and copy its contents to ~/... upon first call. The aur package contains the wrapper script, desktop entry & icon, etc. Until now, tor-brower is installed to /opt/tor-browser and has to be chmodded to USER:USER by a non-root user afterwards. It's only usable for this single user. I don't like both ways ... not really sure what's better, yet.
    As long as nothing gets copied into a user's home directory before that user has run a script, that's fine.
    Maxr wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't there any other way than fetching the public key from a public keyserver to check the signature? Surely, comparing fingerprints would be good, but I think most users won't do this. Automatic checking would at least ensure technical integrity of the archive, just to replace md5/shaX which would be more complex to maintain. But I'll think about it, maybe that should be solved differently.
    Usually public keys are made available in several places so that the user can compare different sources to establish (probable) authenticity. My only point is that it should be left up to the user to accept the key. In a worst-case scenario, maybe the user can't trust his own connection and will have to rely on confirmation through other sources, such as calling a friend to have him check on a completely independent connection. Sure, this is unlikely to come up in most cases, but if the whole point of this is rigorous security, you may as well be rigorous.
    This is mostly a devil's advocate argument. A user who really needs that level of security will either know enough to check it independently, or will eventually get caught through some other mistake anyway.

  • Editable AUR packages

    How about to make AUR packages available for editing like in wiki

    If you want to contribute to a PKGBUILD on the AUR, post a comment. I like to think that most maintainers are open to suggestion. A few might be simply scratching their own itch, and aren't interested in other people's opinions, but if that's the case, they should probably ditch the AUR package and just have a local PKGBUILD.
    If you encounter a maintainer that's unresponsive both through comments and email (two weeks of no response is generally considered unresponsive), post a message to the AUR-General mailing list with a link to the package, and a request to orphan it. Explain the situation, including when you tried to contact the maintainer, what the response was (if any), and reason why you want to take over maintaining it (if applicable). You'll normally get a response within a day from a Trusted User, who can orphan the package for you, or refuse the request (for whatever reason).

  • Multiple users on computer

    This question is somewhat answered on other forum posts, but it begs to be asked again. If enough people ask, maybe the bean counters will start to understand how regular customers buy and use books. Then those same features will be available on eBooks.
    Just installed ADE on one computer, under one user account. (System: Windows XP PRO sp3). Did this as both my wife and myself are getting eBook readers for Christmas. (Augen "TheBook" units)
    First issue / question why not have multiple user ID's supported on single device through the ADE interface directly?
    Can I actually have multiple activated ID's on XP via separate user log-ins? (Again, ADE should be one program instance with multi-users IDs to the one instance, not separate Windows accounts. It should also have a share/loan function and frankly an ownership transfer function.)
    The eReader device itself does not appear to support multiple user logins. So, I guess that means the reader is lock to a single Adobe ID?
    When will the above changes occur if ever?
    (I am also posing this question to Augen's tech support.)
    My soapbox comments to feed up to the publishing world's bean counters that are forcing DRM and fixing prices.
    Real world buying habits. Single book bought by myself or wife may be read by both of us. (Gee! Isn't that a surprise! We don't buy 2 copies.) And maybe occasionally loaned to a friend, passed on to a friend, donated to charity or sold at a garage sale. More likely sitting on a shelf after one or 2 reads.
    Real world current MSRP/list price on a new eBook: As much as or maybe slightly less than the same printed Hardbound book. More than same printed paperback book.(Viewed recent Mary Higgins Clark book as example: 75% of Amazon hardcover price and 163% of not yet released paperback price.)
    Real world cost of delivering eBook vs printed book: About one-tenth the cost of a printed book. And that is with all the extra manpower wasted on DRM programing and servers.It would be a twentieth without the DRM costs.
    Printing, warehousing and transporting books is not cheap. I am in the printing business. I know this.
    An eBook cuts out all the labor and material of printing, all the costs of physical warehouse and transport, and wasted un-sold product or remaindered product. Unsold returns from retailer back to distributor or manufacturer very by catagory and title. But range from 10-50%. That all is gone with an eBook.
    So, every level from publishing to retail is more profitable with the ebook model.
    Real world use of an Ebook with DRM ePub. Restricted to single user on apparently 6 computers and 6 portable devices. Effect is that at best I can buy a book and others in my household may read it on one of the registered devices as well. I have paid as much or more than a trade paperback. Publisher has received a higher profit by far and so has seller. Author has not received a higher percentage or royalty most likely.
    I can not sell it as used, I can not donate it to charity or library. This, even though I have paid full retail and that is effectively ten plus times as much over traditional printed book production and distribution costs. Distributor actually may have higher costs as they must maintain records access for an extended time, which with court cases will in the future probably mean 20 plus years. But, that cost should be well offset by no warehousing or brick & mortar store costs.
    Of coarse I can still read the full printed library of Mark Twain books that my grandmother purchased for my father and uncle in the 1920's today. And those books will last another 100 years with moderate care. So I am paying ten times more than cost, and book may last 20 years (with luck and no business failure)  INSTEAD OF 200.
    Long story short, I am willing to purchase an ePub even with reasonable DRM protections and at a price at or lower than trade paperback, even at 75% of hard bound one new releases on occasion. But, at the much higher profit potential of a single purchased book to publisher and retailer, one should be able to use and share it the same as a printed book.
    As it is, I can not even directly buy an eBook on most sites as a gift. Don't publishers know that books a often bought as gifts?
    Publishers: If your eBook sales are not at the level you would expect, maybe, just maybe the points above may have something to do with why consumers are not buying into eBooks as you would hope.
    I guess that ends my rant for now.

    This might not be the right way but since I was having similar issues today, this something that worked.
    I placed the domain.site file on my time capsule and the Imac which I created the pages with remembered the site.
    On my mac mini I can access the site it if I open the domain.site file directly using the finder and it will then open iweb on my mac mini. If I open iweb directly, it seems to remember previous iweb sites that I created but not the current one.
    Hope this helps.
    If anyone else has another way please let us know.

  • How to convert Xstring to PDF format and send pdf to multiple user

    Hi to all
    can any one provide me saple code to convert Xstring to PDF format and send pdf to multiple user
    i have searched the SDN , but cant get any proper soulution.
    I shall be thankful to you for this.
    Regards
    Pavneet Rana

    Use function module 'SCMS_XSTRING_TO_BINARY' to convert from XString to a Binary table. Just like this:
      CALL FUNCTION 'SCMS_XSTRING_TO_BINARY'
        EXPORTING
          buffer          = lv_xstring_pdf
          append_to_table = ' '
        TABLES
          binary_tab      = lt_doc_content.
    To send the email in an OO way you should user class CA_SEND_REQUEST_BCS. Take a look to program BCS_EXAMPLE_6 or any of the test programs in package SBCOMS.

  • [solved] Pulseaudio, multiple users, audio group?

    Hello!
    I'm trying to get pulseaudio working for multiple users. According to the pulseaudio documentation, no user should be in the audio group which should theoretically make it work. I think I've also seen that information in a file distributed with the official archlinux package somewhere... But without users in that group, I'm not getting any sound at all.
    $ ls -l /dev/snd
    total 0
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 5. Okt 23:13 by-path
    crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 7 5. Okt 23:13 controlC0
    crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 6 5. Okt 23:13 hwC0D0
    crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 5 6. Okt 21:12 pcmC0D0c
    crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 4 6. Okt 21:11 pcmC0D0p
    crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 3 5. Okt 23:15 pcmC0D1p
    crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 2 5. Okt 23:13 pcmC0D2c
    crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 1 5. Okt 23:13 seq
    crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 33 5. Okt 23:13 timer
    That should - according to pusleaudio docu - mean, that HAL and/or polkit will be handling user switching & stuff but it can be overridden by the audio group...? Well it does not seem to be working that way.
    So... where do I start? Can't find any relevant information... everything on the subject seems to be either obsolete or just not working...
    Thanks!
    Last edited by whoops (2012-11-03 13:21:52)

    I log into a tty and let xfce handle the rest. Which means the first user's X gets started by startxfce4, the second user by xinit + xfce4-session (because I don't know how to make startxfce4 use another display).
    I thought those two should handle everything correctly? I took a look at the sources a while back - looked pretty complicated to me: the scripts were checking for the status of needed stuff + trying to launch everything correctly.
    But I'll try it manually again next time I get to it to make sure, that ck-launch-stuff is really handled correctly. Thanks for the hint!
    Last edited by whoops (2012-10-08 07:22:51)

  • [SOLVED] can't build an AUR package while installing Arch

    So I am nearly there installing Arch for the first time. And I will start with saying that I am really sorry if I missed the answer to my problem but I have had a look around the documentation and the general webz for something regarding this problem and haven't found anything.
    I am trying to set my wireless connection up but I apparently need the AUR b43-firmware package installed for my Broadcom BCM4322 [14e4:432b] to be functional.
    So I follow the documentation to install an AUR package, but I am stuck at the building stage as makepkg does not allow me to build if I am root, and I am root by default while installing/configuring Arch...
    What should I do to build and install that package so I have a wireless connection later on?
    Cheers
    Last edited by chtfn (2015-03-21 14:11:12)

    I am connected to the wired network, and I followed the steps to make it persistent for later, but I just wanted to go through the wireless stuff too to be extra sure I will be able to connect to the Internet later on. As it is the first time I install Arch, I am trying to be extra cautious, and having that security would make me feel more comfortable! Plus, I am keen to learn how to do those things from the command line.
    Isn't there a way to switch to a normal user just for a command, and automatically reverting back to root when that action is finished? Just like sudo but the other way round

  • New binutils 2.22 causing havoc on many AUR packages

    Many posts around here showing that this is a common problem. ld has changed behaviour and has broken some packages that don't explicitly link to libraries.
    My example: Minutor
    gcc -Wl,--as-needed -o minutor minutor.o mapviewer.o colorschemes.o `pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0` MinutorMap/MinutorMap.a
    /usr/bin/ld: MinutorMap/MinutorMap.a(nbt.o): undefined reference to symbol 'gzopen'
    /usr/bin/ld: note: 'gzopen' is defined in DSO /usr/lib/libz.so.1 so try adding it to the linker command line
    /usr/lib/libz.so.1: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
    collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
    make: *** [minutor] Error 1
    Related info I found on the Fedora Wiki
    All posts so far suggest adding things to LDFLAGS but none of them have worked for me yet. Found on thread "EMC2 Simulator (CNC) PKGBUILD":
    falconindy wrote:
    --as-needed isn't the problem here, it's transitive linking. See the first item in the ld changelog for binutils 2.22. There's two options:
    - add "-Wl,--copy-dt-needed-entries" to LDFLAGS
    - add "-lXt" to LDFLAGS
    Either way, this should be fixed upstream. You should explicitly link against any library you depend on.
    This didn't work for me whether I put it in the PKGBUILD or /etc/makepkg.conf
    Any ideas?
    EDIT: It appears that the LDFLAGS are not being added to the gcc line shown above no matter where I put the additional LDFLAGS. Perhaps I'm doing it wrong.
    Last edited by quantumphaze (2012-02-08 07:32:11)

    ngoonee wrote:P.S. - OT - I've got 99 AUR packages installed and this problem doesn't show up on any of them, so I'm not sure what 'common' means in your case
    I maintain one package in AUR and it hit this issue. From this I extrapolate that every AUR package is broken
    Anyway, patch for minutor:
    --- minutor.orig/Makefile 2011-05-21 08:34:22.000000000 +0200
    +++ minutor/Makefile 2012-02-08 11:15:13.682083948 +0100
    @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
    all: $(EXEC)
    $(EXEC): $(OBJS) maplib
    - $(CC) -Wl,--as-needed -o $(EXEC) $(OBJS) $(LIBS) MinutorMap/MinutorMap.a
    + $(CC) -Wl,--as-needed -o $(EXEC) $(OBJS) $(LIBS) MinutorMap/MinutorMap.a -lz
    install: $(EXEC)
    install -d $(BIN) $(DESKTOP) $(PIXMAP)
    Last edited by Gusar (2012-02-08 10:14:44)

Maybe you are looking for