Authorization/Allocations for XMLForms

Where can i allocate km and security zones?
The standard roles were copied and limited on necessary functions. In this framework however the call went from XML form lost. I could imagine that the problem lies in the Security Zones or km authorizations. With copy of the roles the allocations to km and security zones are not taken over. I could find no references to necessary authorization/allocations for XMLForms.
Regards

Indeed the allocation function is and will not be supported in integrated planning if you want it I think you should install SEM on top of it.
But using the standard allocation function is not really recommended because the set up is done within BPS or IP modeler and if the allocation run changes a lot the user should have authorization to this and that is not recommended. A standard allocation function can be easily recreated using an input screen with all kind of allocation keys and a formula function(FOX). You have also more possibilities then in the standard function.
So create an input screen for entering stat key figures or % for sender and receiver. And create within FOX a function that uses these parameters to run the allocation function.
Kris Bornauw

Similar Messages

Custom authorization provider for WL7 problem (not getting all parameters from ContextHandler)

I'm implementing a custom authorization provider for WebLogic 7.
In my Access Decision isAccessAllowed method I need to check values of
the parameters passed to an EJB method. Now, if an EJB method I have
two parameters of the same type, for example int, when I get
ContextElement array from ContextHandler and iterate through it to get
names and values of the parameters I get the same value (value of the
first int parameter) from both ContextElement's.
Here is the code:
String [] names = ch.getNames();
for (int i = 0; i < names.length; i++)
String name = names;
System.out.println("name = " + name);//here it gets array of
Strings, which contains two parameter names: "int","int",
which are the types of EJB method parameters
ContextElement[] ces= ch.getValues(names);
for (int j = 0; j < ces.length; j++)
     ContextElement ce = ces[j];
     System.out.println(ce.getName()+ " = " + ce.getValue());
//here if the value of the first int was 2 and the second 0,
it would get 2 from both ContextElements (each of ContextElements will
have name "int"
If I try this with method parameters of different types, for example
int with value 2 and long with value 0, then this code work fine -
first ContextEleement has name int and value 2 and the second has name
long and value 0.
Thanks,
-Oleg Kozlov.

I'm implementing a custom authorization provider for WebLogic 7.
In my Access Decision isAccessAllowed method I need to check values of
the parameters passed to an EJB method. Now, if an EJB method I have
two parameters of the same type, for example int, when I get
ContextElement array from ContextHandler and iterate through it to get
names and values of the parameters I get the same value (value of the
first int parameter) from both ContextElement's.
Here is the code:
String [] names = ch.getNames();
for (int i = 0; i < names.length; i++)
String name = names;
System.out.println("name = " + name);//here it gets array of
Strings, which contains two parameter names: "int","int",
which are the types of EJB method parameters
ContextElement[] ces= ch.getValues(names);
for (int j = 0; j < ces.length; j++)
     ContextElement ce = ces[j];
     System.out.println(ce.getName()+ " = " + ce.getValue());
//here if the value of the first int was 2 and the second 0,
it would get 2 from both ContextElements (each of ContextElements will
have name "int"
If I try this with method parameters of different types, for example
int with value 2 and long with value 0, then this code work fine -
first ContextEleement has name int and value 2 and the second has name
long and value 0.
Thanks,
-Oleg Kozlov.

Authorization Group for G/L Account

Hi,
What?
- I wish to restrict the 'posting' of a G/L account to be done by certain users only
How?
- What I have done was...
a) From FS00, I have added a free-text (BANK) into the Authorization Group for a G/L account
b) From PFCG, a new role was created to allow these 2 Authorization Objects, F_BKPF_BES and F_SKA1_BES
c) 'BANK' was entered for the Authorization Group for both these 2 Authorization Objects
d) From there, I have assigned this new role to the user that I wish to allow Posting of the G/L account
Problem?
- Other users still can do Posting for this G/L account
- Any steps which I have missed out here or done wrongly?
Thanks,
Brandon

Hi,
Some other roles of the users may override and cause the users to post against this GL account.
Check all the roles relevant for the restricted users.
Use SUIM t-code to find if the auth object mentioned above is included in any other role.
If it be, restrict that again.
Generally if one role as no restriction against this auth and not all, this issue tends to happen.
Regards,
Sridevi

Analysis Authorization failed for Multiprovider

Hi all,
We are facing an issue pertaining to the Analysis Authorization for a multiprovider. When we attempt to access a query base on a multiprovider, the program complains that it has insufficient authorization. So we did debugging in the customer exit and we realise it fails to populate the rest of the authorization variables in I_step = 0. Base on our initial investigation this only happens on queries on multiprovider, so is there anything I need to set or do to curb this error?
Many thanks!

Best solution is to trace the authorization for your issue in ST01.
Switch on the trace in ST01 and start your work. if you face authoirzation check failed. look into the trace there you will find the logs and authorization failed for your userid.
And one more thing, have you got anything in SU53 as authorization check failed?
Hope this would help you.

I can't synchronize my iPod's with my iTunes software (Windows Vista Home Premium) due to problems with the access authorization / rights for this operation

Hi there,
I'd like to ask you something:
I'm trying to synchronize all my iPod's (I have as many as 4 iPods: 2 iPod touch a 8 GB each and 2 iPod classic a 160 GB each) with my iTunes software (Version 11.3.1 which is installed on a Windows PC (Windows Vista Home Premium)). Unfortunately, the iTunes software refuses to run the command "synchronize with the iPod connected" regarding each and every iPod I have. iTunes just declares:
Synchronizing is impossible because I wouldn't hold the access authorization / rights for this operation.
I uploaded the songs at issue to my iTunes folder from CD's (all songs are in AAC format now).
What is this access authorization, why was something like that invented and what can I do to get it?
How do I have to proceed in detail?
What would it cost?
I am brand new here and have never ever made a post in any support community anywhere in the world in my life. Well, and I am not excessively knowledgeable about the particular computer or mac language but I know the very basics or can find out about them.
Anyways - can you help me please?
If you can't help me, who can do so?
It would be nice if you could answer me as soon as possible!
Thank you guys
Prying Pedro

Yes, others have experienced the problem, a simple search of the forums would have revealed that and the simple solution.
Termporarily disable any security software on the computer.

Training and event management - Internal Activity Allocation for Attendees(PV18)

Dear all,
I run the PV18 transaction (Internal Activity Allocation for Attendees). Lets imagine that I successfully allocated 1000 EUR in the CO module. Then I realize that it was a mistake, and I want to correct this by sending -1000 EUR to CO.
My question is: how can I do that? Is PV18 capable of doing this? Or this has to be corrected manually in CO module?
Thanks
Nándor

>>I tried to create it and the system generated a message about using the allowed name space.
if it is a warning message, I think, you can go ahead & create the HRTEM entry in TTYP table.. you can check if this will let you get past the Activity Allocation.
~Suresh

How to monitor space allocation for each table......????

Hi ,
using the user_segment and especially the blocks column , i get the following results (in scott schema):
SQL> select segment_name , blocks from user_segments where segment_name in ('DEPT','EMP');
SEGMENT_NAME                                                                         BLOCKS
DEPT                                                                                      8
EMP                                                                                       8Using the user_tables and the blocks column , i get the following results :
SQL> SELECT TABLE_NAME , BLOCKS FROM USER_TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME IN ('DEPT','EMP');
TABLE_NAME                         BLOCKS
DEPT                                    5
EMP                                     5So , is it correct to say that the space allocation for each of these tables is 5/8 =62,5% ...?????
Thanks , a lot
Simon

The difference of those is empty_blocks, isn't it ?That is not the case :
SQL> select segment_name , blocks from user_segments where segment_name in ('DEPT','EMP');
SEGMENT_NAME                                                                          BLOCKS
DEPT                                                                                       8
EMP                                                                                        8
SQL> SELECT TABLE_NAME , BLOCKS , EMPTY_BLOCKS FROM USER_TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME IN ('DEPT','EMP');
TABLE_NAME                         BLOCKS EMPTY_BLOCKS
DEPT                                    5            0
EMP                                     5            0
SQL> Nicolas.

Error in actual template allocation for Business Process

Gurus,
I am facing a strange problem in actual template allocation for business process (T-code: CPAS). When I am doing a test run, the system gives the result with a message "Processing completed with no errors", However when I have unchecked the test run and ran the allocation, system shows me the result, however no posting takes place. The message I am getting is:
"Data not updated due to errors". The details of this error message are:
No information was found
Message no. GU444
Diagnosis
The system could not find the necessary information.
I am absolutely clueless and have no idea where things have gone wrong. I have maintained the activity and cost center properly. The template I am using is also ok.
Request your help on this. Any suggestion would be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
Snigdho.

Hi ,
With such kind of error " "Data not updated due to errors". " its very difficult so determine the exact cause of the issue .
Did your selection parameters in CPAS has a tick on detailed list . Please tick the detailed list icon and run KPAS again and let me know if you are getting more detailed error from SAP.
Regards
Sarada

Memory could not be allocated for the activation process. Please close all applications and try agai

I have just had a Windows XP failure and took the opportunity to replace with Windows 7. After I reinstalled PhotoShop CS(1) the message "Memory could not be allocated for the activation process. Please close all applications and try again" is shown and forces PhotoShop to close. I have 4Gb of Ram installed and a total of about 10Gb of Page File space on three partitions of a 500Gb HDD. The system is not heavily loaded! However, I cannot access Photoshop to check scratch disk allocation. How to fix???
Back to top

Yes, there are many forums, and it can be confusing. Your question has the best chance of being answered if it is in the proper place. I think it is there now.
Pattie
http://forums.adobe.com/message/5092533#5092533 is your post address
Download and installation forum:
http://forums.adobe.com/community/download_install_setup

Memory could not be allocated for the activation process. Please close all applications and tr again

Hello,
Just purchased a new laptop:
Intel Core 2 quad
4gb memory
1000 HDD
Photoshop CS 8.0 disc dead/scratched/unreadable. So I copied my Adobe folder from my Program Files Folder on my PC and pasted on laptop. When I try and run PS I get the error message "Memory could not be allocated for the activation process. Please close all applications and try again". Which I do then Photoshop closes.
Can anyone help (in layman terms please)?

Not really. You are essentially FUBARd. Without a proper install, there is usually no way on to get the licensing stuff working. You might be able to get there by installing any other CS product, so PS could latch on to the licensing system that would be already in place, but otherwise it's a lost cause. Simply copying over the executables is normally not enough. I will admit though, that I skipped CS, so there may be some tool somewhere that I don't know about can do this post facto...
Mylenium

Memory Could Not Be Allocated For the Activation of PhotoShop

CS2 Intel P4 3.0GhzHT, 3-4GB Ram WinXP
Photoshop won't open for me. It used to. Any idea how I might fix this?
When I try to open Photoshop, I get "Memory could not be allocated for the activation process. Please close all applications and try again."
I've done this with no applications after a fresh reboot and get the same message.
It only started recently. Photoshop used to open for me and was usable.
I got 3 or 4 GB of ram. I can't remember, but WinXP only sees about 3GB anyway. Either way should be more than enough, no?

Lee71 wrote:
hey john, thanks for resuscitating the topic. I on XP and it’s PS8
I have defragged, cleaned disc, etc.
In terms of symptoms, PS opens up and once open the prompt comes up. I hit okay and it shuts down.
i have tried CTRL + ALT + SHIFT whilst PS boots up; i get the prompt "ÿou currently have Adobe Photoshops primary Scratch and Windows' primary paging file on the same volume, which can result in reduced performance. It is reommmended that you set PS Primary Scratch Volume to be on a differrent volume, preferably on a different physical dirve."
I guess this means reinstall, partition and set up on a partitioned drive? I don't particularly want to take this course of action if there is an alternative. It doesn't make sense given I've got plenty of space.
No no need for that!
The message about the scratch drive is normal: the CTRL + ALT + SHIFT resets the preferences to the default for a single HDD. If you have more than one, go into Edit > Preferences > Performance and set the primary scratch drive to the one without the paging file.
Once you have OK'd that message it should go away if you do only have one HDD.
Partitioning will not do anything. The object of the separate drives (if you have them) is to avoid conflict between Scratch and Page file.
Do you still have your original problem?

Problem in BOM or component allocation for the Non- codified Item in a PO.

Hi All,
Please advise how to explode a BOM or Assign component in a Purchase order with Item category (L) for a Operation oriented material for which no material code is created from a production order .
Actually in my scenario, no raw material component will send to the Sub -Contract Vendor. Only Assembled operation material lets say operation 20 from a routing ( which is not having material code ) from an In - house production from a shopfloor has to be sent to the vendor to create a operation 30 material , which is also not having a material code." How to explode a BOM or component allocation for the Non- codified Item in a PO".
Kindly give me the IMG settings for the above scenario.
regards,
YK

Hi Prasobh,
Tnx for your suggestion. But, the client external processing routing is not constant activity . Based on the Operation bottlenecks client is sending the operation as external Processing. For Eg., If on first order operation 20 be external , Then in second order operation 20 need not be external. operation 30 may go out for external processing. Client does not want a material code for each operation.
Give your valuable suggestion.
regards,
YK

Authorization restriction for Goods issue against an Order

Hello All,
We have a situation wherein the user is able to issue goods using tcode MIGO by choosing Goods issue --> Others and mentioning an order number that belongs to another plant in the account assignment tab and issues a material which belongs another plant.
For eg we have material A that has been created for plant 1. The user issues the material (movement type 261)and the account is assigned to an order which has been created for plant 2.
I could not find any authorization object that restricts this.
I checked the objects M_MSEG_BWA and M_MSEG_WWA and he has authorizations only for plant 1 and all movement types.
Any pointers to restrict this access will be appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Subramaniam Iyer

Hi,
MIGO transaction by default restricted with Plant. If you say that the user A is having access to only Plant 1 & 3, but not for 2, please check the below authorization objects does not have any manual objects inserted into the Role and restricted with the value only in organization field.
M_MSEG_LGO
M_MSEG_WMB
M_MSEG_WWA
M_MSEG_WWE
This issue may occur because if the objects are maintained manually in the role. If so, when you check in the organization field, it may not be showing the value which are manually added into the manual object.
Also, please check the other roles are assigned to the user. If any of the other roles assigned to the user having any of the above objects with * value, this may provide the user to do the Goods movement for any plant.
To check the issue, please go to SUIM and check the user under "Roles by Complex Selection Criteria" and make sure that you are checking the objects for the particular user. This should be able to identify whether the user is getting access from any other roles assigned to the user.
Regards
Anandm

Authorization checks for PNP LDB

question : how to validate authorization checks for pnp logical database?
2 nd question: hr report
this report is basically for salary survey. in this i had so many fields can any body let me know how
can i form the internal tables. and i have to display overall 150 fields in csv file for that
how can i take in to the final internal table.
what is the logic behind this:
T71JPR09-JOBCODE
PA0000-PERNR
HRP1000-STEXT
P0006-PSTLZ
PA0008-ANSAL * 100 / PA0008-BSGRD
PA0015-BETRG
PA0761-LTEXT WHERE PA0761-CPLAN = LTI PLAN PSU YEAR 1
PA0761-GRADT WHERE PA0761-CPLAN = LTI PLAN PSU YEAR 1
PA0761-ZZGRANT WHERE PA0761-CPLAN = LTI PLAN PSU YEAR 1
PA0761-LTEXT WHERE PA0761-CPLAN = LTI PLAN esu YEAR 1
like that i had.
please give me the steps how can i proceed.

Hi,
The PNP database will take care of authorization check. It will not execute if used does not have authorizations.
Hope this helps.

Authorization object for Object services

Hello together,
I want to know if there is an authorization object for Generic object services functionilty especially the WF options like WF overview, start WF, Archieve WF..............................
My understanding is any user who has access to a particular Business object, can user GOS to view WF stuff..................Is my understanding correct or should we have extra functions.....................
Regards

Check authorization objects S_OC_ROLE and, for recent releases, S_GOS_ATT.
Regards,
Raymond

Authorization/Allocations for XMLForms

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for