Authorization not working

I have a problem with authorization - I tried to play music that my brother had bought on his computer, and was prompted to authorize (it was already authorized). After authorizing the song did not play, but when I clicked on it it prompted me to authorize again. Each time I authorized it displayed a message along the lines of "Authorization Successful, 5 out of 5 machines authorized." I went to the account and deauthorized all computers. Now when I try to authorize it says Authorization Successful, 1 out of 5 machines authorized, but when I try to play it again prompts me to authorize.
I have recently uninstalled iTunes 7.6 and installed 7.5(.02?) because of other problems that I was having. Could this be the source of the problem? To me it doesn't seem likely and I would really hate to go back to 7.6.
Thanks for any help

Click here and follow the instructions.
(29743)

Similar Messages

  • Analysis Authorization not working - Empty demarcation

    Can someone help me on this Analysis Authorization? I read many threads in SDN, it seems that I followed the correct steps. The restriction on S_RS_COMP is working well but the restriction on the Analysis Authorization is not working. Surely I'm making some mistake, but can't find what's wrong.
    I'm a User (say USER_00) in a test system, assigned to a Role (say Z:BI_USER). This is a broad role:
    - S_RS_COMP and S_RS_COMP1 have full authorization (*) to all the fields,
    - S_RS_AUTH has the BIAUTH field with Name of Authorization = *.
    Also I have an InfoArea (ZIA_TEST) and an InfoCube (ZIC_TEST). The IC has some characteristics and key figures. The only authorization relevant characteristic is ZCA_CLI (client). The IC has only 5 lines, one for each client ("CLI_01" to "CLI_05").
    Also there's a query (ZQR_TEST) on this IC, with an Authorization Variable (VAR_AUTH_CLI) restricting the characteristic ZCA_CLI.
    I'm trying to create a new User and restrict him to this IC and only to the data of client "CLI_01". If it works I'll apply to a production system.
    What I did:
    1) With tcode SU01 created a new User (USER_01) with no Role neither Analysis Authorization.
    2) With tcode PFCG copied the Role Z:BI_USER as Z:ROLE_TEST then made some changes:
    a) S_RS_COMP
    - Activity = 03 and 16
    - InfoArea = ZIA_TEST
    - InfoCube = ZIC_TEST
    - Type of report component = *
    - Name of report component = *.
    b) S_RS_COMP1
    - Kept * to all fields.
    c) S_RS_AUTH
    - I inactivated and deleted this Authorization Object.
    (I don't want to keep characteristic values restriction inside the role. The idea is to associate different users to the same role, allowing them to see the same ICs and execute the same queries. And differentiate wich characteristic values each one can see by manually associating different analysis authorization to each one.).
    3) With tcode RSECAUTH I created an Analysis Authorization (Z_AA_CLI_01) to restrict access only to client "CLI_01":
    - ZCA_CLI = "CLI_01"
    - 0TCAACTVT = "03"
    - 0TCAIPROV = "ZIC_TEST"
    - 0TCAVALID = "*".
    4) With tcode PFCG I assigned User "USER_01" to the Role " Z:ROLE_TEST" and made Complete Comparison.
    5) With tcode RSU01 I manually assigned Analysis Authorization " Z_AA_CLI_01" to User "USER_01".
    It seems to me that these steps are enough. But:
    a) When I log as USER_00 and go to tcode RSRT2, searching by InfoAreas I can see all the InfoAreas and all the InfoCubes, select and execute the query. That's OK.
    b) When I log as USER_01 and go to RSRT2, searching by InfoAreas I can see only ZIA_TEST and under it I can see only ZIC_TEST. That's OK. Then I select and execute the query.
    Wich means that S_RS_COMP is OK and each user is assigned to the correct Role.
    c) The problem is that in both cases the query brings data from all Clients.
    Under Information and Variable Values (when I run with HTML display) the message is "Empty demarcation".
    I changed the variable to be Ready for Input, just to see wich values it brings. In both cases (as USER_00 and as USER_01) in the Variable Screen it brings all the 5 Clients from the IC and I can select and execute any value.
    So the problem is with the Analysis Authorization or with the Variable, but I can't find what's wrong.
    Any help will be very appreciated.
    César

    OK Marc, it worked.
    Sorry for not answering earlier, but I could get back to this front only some days ago, then began testing your suggestions.
    1) Security Concept
    Authorization Mode was set to "Obsolete Concept with RSR Authorization Objects" (it would never work with this setting).
    I changed to "Current Procedure with Analysis Authorizations".
    Anyway, what's the function of this setting? Do old Reporting Authorizations work with "Current Procedure with Analysis Authorizations" setting?
    2) Variable Representation
    With "Multiple Single Values" it really led to problems.
    With "Selection Option" it worked well.
    3) 0TCAKYFNM
    I don't understand why, but if the AA doesn't have the char/dimension 0TCAKYFNM, when the User tries to run the query (tcode RSRT2) it accuses "You do not have sufficient authorization".
    Info Cube ZIC_VE95 has two KFs (ZKF_QTL95 and ZKF_VLT95). These KFs are used only on this IC (also in the KF Catalog, but it doesn't impact). This IC is used only on Query ZQR_VE95 (also in Transformation and DTP, wich doesn't impact).
    Well, I inserted 0TCAKYFNM and it worked, either with CP, "*" or with EQ, the two KFs.
    4) Authorization Policy Definition
    The situation I'm working on is very typical. Ex.: Some users are Administrators, Managers, Operator 1, Operator 2 and so on. Each Role needs authorization to access some queries. At the same time, they can access information only of the Cost Centers to wich they are related.
    There are many ways to implement it (I tested some of them and they worked well). My point is to define a most practical way, easy to understand and to maintain.
    I'm now sympathetic to this way:
    a) Create functional Roles (ex.: "Administrator", "Manager", "Operator 1", "Operator 2" and so on) defining only the Queries (or Info Areas, Info Providers, etc) each Role needs. No S_RS_AUTH definition.
    b) Create Char Value Roles (ex.: "CC_100_to_199", "CC_200_to_299", etc), only with S_RS_AUTH definition, each one associated with a corresponding AA (ex.: AA for CC 100 to 199, AA for CC 200 to 299 and so on).
    c) Create Composite Roles associating functional and char value Roles. Ex. Composite Role "Administrator for CC 100 to 199", composed of the Roles "Administrator" and "CC_100_to_199".
    d) Associate Users to the Composite Roles.
    Anyway, I'd appreciate if you could indicate some literature (blogs, articles, etc) on this theme.
    Well, thank you very much for your answers. Now I can go on with my studies on this subject.
    César Menezes

  • Analysis authorization not working on WAS server

    Does BI Java  required for Analysis authorization to work ?
    Can we manage with WAS server to show analyis authorization ?
    Actually we don't have BI java configured in our system...so we are executing the query on WAS server ( BI ABAP).....but on this we are not able to see analysis authorization working....system is showing all the possible values and not the authorized value in AA.....
    Regards
    Tripple k

    Jason
    1. 0BI_ALL is not assigned to the user.
    2. I have already set the Authorization scheme as "New analysis authorization" in SPRO.
    3. i am executing the report from T-Code RSRT
        A> Select the report and click on ABAP Web ( Choose query display as List or Analyzer or HTML) - System is showing entire orgunit while it should show only 3 org unit   assigned to user in RSECADMIN.
       B> Select the query and execute on Java Web - Error in connectin as BI java is not there on portal side
       C> Select the query and choose Query Display as "HTML" click on Execute button - Only 3 values restricted in RSECADMIN are appearing.
    Hope somebody can throw some light on this.
    Regards
    Tripple k

  • Bluetooth authorization not working (bluez-simple-agent)

    Hello
    I'm trying to connect my Sony BD remote control to my laptop. Pairing and manual connect using hcitool works fine, but when my remote control initiates the connection,  my laptop seem to deny its connection requests. (See attached hcidump output).
    I have tried using bluez-simple-agent, and I get the authorization request prompt. I enter 'yes', hit return, and I immediately get "Cancel" printed on the terminal. The remote control is still not authorized.
    I have dbus running, as well as bluetoothd, hci2hci and hidd running.
    Please help! I'm clueless at this point.
    hcidump says:
    * Connection pending - Authorization pending
    * Connection refused - security block
    * Reason: Remote User Terminated Connection
    hcidump output:
    > ACL data: handle 11 flags 0x02 dlen 12
    L2CAP(s): Connect req: psm 19 scid 0x0148
    < ACL data: handle 11 flags 0x02 dlen 16
    L2CAP(s): Connect rsp: dcid 0x0041 scid 0x0148 result 1 status 2
    Connection pending - Authorization pending
    < ACL data: handle 11 flags 0x02 dlen 16
    L2CAP(s): Connect rsp: dcid 0x0041 scid 0x0148 result 3 status 0
    Connection refused - security block
    > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
    handle 11 packets 2
    > ACL data: handle 11 flags 0x02 dlen 12
    L2CAP(s): Disconn req: dcid 0x0040 scid 0x0147
    < ACL data: handle 11 flags 0x02 dlen 12
    L2CAP(s): Disconn rsp: dcid 0x0040 scid 0x0147
    > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
    handle 11 packets 2
    > ACL data: handle 11 flags 0x02 dlen 12
    L2CAP(s): Disconn req: dcid 0x0041 scid 0x0148
    < ACL data: handle 11 flags 0x02 dlen 12
    L2CAP(s): Disconn rsp: dcid 0x0041 scid 0x0148
    > ACL data: handle 11 flags 0x02 dlen 12
    L2CAP(s): Disconn rsp: dcid 0x0147 scid 0x0040
    > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
    handle 11 packets 2
    > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
    handle 11 packets 1
    > HCI Event: Disconn Complete (0x05) plen 4
    status 0x00 handle 11 reason 0x13
    Reason: Remote User Terminated Connection
    Last edited by oskarn (2009-10-29 17:03:43)

    Is there any way to add a device to a list of trusted devices?
    I once read about a certain file called "trusted" in a bluetooth directory, and it almost worked when I added my device there, but once connected it disconnected and the device was removed from the trusted list.
    Any idea what is going on here?

  • Hierarchy Authorization not working on Navigational Attribute

    Hello,
    We have 0ORGUNIT as nav attribute in 0EMPLOYEE and 0ORGUNIT has enterprise hierarchy set.
    Now we have analysis authorization based on both 0ORGUNIT and 0EMPLOYEE__0ORGUNIT (nav attr).
    When an user tries to run a web report which has normal 0ORGUNIT in it, in the variable screen he is able to see the entire hierarchy tree structure as per his authorizations. On the other hand when the same user tries to run another report which has nav attr 0EMPLOYEE__0ORGUNIT in it, in the variable screen he can see only the top nodes of the hierarchy to which he is authorized. He cant see the tree structure.
    Please note we are on BI 7 SPS 21 and in both the queries we are using hierarchy variable set on correct hierarchy. Also the attributes in the query have hierarchy activated on them.
    Please suggest any ideas/views for the same.
    Thanks!!
    Regards,
    Shashank

    Neo - We need current info on 0ORGUNIT and hence cant go with concept of historic truth as per what you mentioned.
    Bhawani - We have set it to level 1 which is perfectly fine as it works for other hierarchy's perfectly.
    Regards,
    SHahsank

  • AAA authorization not working

    Hi,
    Configured the switch for the AAA authentication it's getting authenticated but it's failing for authentication.
    When connected to console it worked-  Authenticated and then supplied the enable password.
    When telneted : it says "access approved" and  "authorization failed"
    Relevant switch configuration is as follows  and also debug of aaa authorization.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    no service single-slot-reload-enable
    no service pad
    service timestamps debug uptime
    service timestamps log uptime
    service password-encryption
    hostname Switch
    aaa new-model
    aaa authentication login default group radius local
    aaa authentication enable default enable
    aaa authorization config-commands
    aaa authorization exec default group radius if-authenticated local
    aaa authorization commands 15 default group radius if-authenticated local
    enable secret 5 $lkl34579231$uK8U$B4sL3AiXAEUzZ8o.Dv34Y/
    username cisco privilege 15 password 7 05080F1C224233 
    vlan 10
    vlan 120
    ip subnet-zero
    vtp mode transparent
    spanning-tree extend system-id
    interface FastEthernet0/1
      switchport access vlan 10
      switchport mode access
      no ip address
      spanning-tree portfast
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
      no ip address
    interface GigabitEthernet0/2
      no ip address
    interface Vlan1
      no ip address
      shutdown
    interface Vlan120
      ip address 10.12.8.70 255.255.255.240
    ip default-gateway 10.12.8.65
    ip classless
    ip http server
    radius-server host 192.168.38.169 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813
    radius-server host 10.12.1.142 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813
    radius-server retransmit 3
    radius-server key cisco
    line con 0
    line vty 0 4
      password 7 grrfcb7swe
      transport input telnet
    line vty 5 15
    end
    Debug output :
    Switch#
    21:45:02: AAA/AUTHEN/CONT (2947331915): continue_login (user='(undef)')
    21:45:02: AAA/AUTHEN (2947331915): status = GETUSER
    21:45:02: AAA/AUTHEN (2947331915): Method=radius (radius)
    21:45:02: AAA/AUTHEN (2947331915): status = GETPASS
    21:45:06: AAA/AUTHEN/CONT (2947331915): continue_login (user='wrrt\trial1')
    21:45:06: AAA/AUTHEN (2947331915): status = GETPASS
    21:45:06: AAA/AUTHEN (2947331915): Method=radius (radius)
    21:45:07: AAA/AUTHEN (2947331915): status = PASS
    21:45:07: tty1 AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC (284909353): Port='tty1' list='' service=EXEC
    21:45:07: AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC: tty1 (284909353) user='wrrt\trial1 '
    21:45:07: tty1 AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC (284909353): send AV service=shell
    21:45:07: tty1 AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC (284909353): send AV cmd*
    21:45:07: tty1 AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC (284909353): found list "default"
    21:45:07: tty1 AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC (284909353): Method=radius (radius)
    21:45:07: AAA/AUTHOR (284909353): Post authorization status = FAIL -------------------------#  authorization failed #
    21:45:07: AAA/AUTHOR/EXEC: Authorization FAILED
    21:45:09: AAA/MEMORY: free_user (0xDF12AC) user='wrrt\trial1' ruser='' port='tty1' rem_addr='10.12.7.71' authen_type=ASCII service=LOGIN priv=1
    Switch#
    Switch#
    Do we need to change anything on Radius server or can we change the authorization preference to local and then to radius.
    Please share the experience.
    Thanks in advance,
    Subodh

    Hi Subodh,
    I understand that you are trying to use command authorization using RADIUS.
    aaa authorization commands 15 default group radius if-authenticated local
    Command authorization is not supported in RADIUS. RADIUS does not allow users to control which commands can be executed       on a router and which cannot.
    Please refer the following link:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk59/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094e99.shtml
    You need to use TACACS+ for configuring command authorization for IOS and PIX/ASA.
    Regards,
    Karthik Chandran
    *kindly rate helpful post*

  • Authorization not working on new computer; can't play music!

    I moved all of my music from my old computer to my new computer, and I did so using my iPod and the instructions that Apple provides on their website. All of the music shows up in iTunes on the new computer, but it won't play. I get a pop-up indicating that I need to authorize this computer to play whatever song I have selected, but even after it tells me "Authorization Successful, You have authorized two out of five computers," I cannot play the music. I have tried everything humanly possible to fix the problem, to no avail. Can anyone help? This is very frustrating.
      Windows XP  

    Suedarn,
    When you bought and downloaded the episodes, you got what you paid for. When you goto another computer you can't redownload them, you have to transfer the file from the old PC to the new one or make a backup of what you bought so when your PC crashes, you can reload the PC with a backup.
    If you only saved the "Programs" folder and not the "My Music" folder where iTunes puts all its bought songs at, then your most likly out of luck. You can try to email the Music storee to see if they will set up a "Re download" of your lost episodes and download them using "Check for purchases" under the advance menu in iTUnes. Just keep in mind there under no obligation to do so, it states on there site if you loose it you have to buy it again. I had a system failer and emailed them and LUCKLY they offered a re download option for me to get my songs back and I made a backup ASAP
    Heres a link to email the music store http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/musicstore/download/
    Heres a link on how to backup purchases in iTunes http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/musicstore/backup/

  • Help! Apps won't load and authorization not working.

    Hi.
    When I updated my new iPod recently, many of my apps seem to have required 'authorization' in order to upload them to my recently bought iPod Touch 5S. However, when I try to validate, it says it cannot access iTunes Store, even though I can otherwise. My apps aren't uploaded to my iPod. Any help?

    Can't connect to the iTunes Store

  • Windows to Mac - authorization not working

    I just bought a brand new MacBook Pro and wanted to move my iTunes library from my PC to the Mac. I authorized the Mac, turned on Home Sharing, but NONE of the purchased music will import. I'm being told the computer isn't authorized, though it very clearly is. What can I do to get EVERYTHING off my PC onto the Mac so it will be the computer I sync to for numerous devices? Thank you!

    If you got to the support page there are some things you can try before you use the chat option to ask Apple for help:
    http://www.apple.com/uk/support/itunes/
    Go to the Authorisation section and there is a menu for Troubleshooting problems - one of the links is to [Some of my iTunes Store purchases won't play|http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1325]
    I'm sorry I don't know how to fix your problem as I've never moved from Windows to Mac. Hopefully someone else with more knowledge will see this and respond.
    Regards,
    Colin R.

  • Authorization Object is not working when report is modified.

    Hi BW Guru's
    We have Company Code as Authorization Object .and we have 3 company Codes (xxxx,yyyy,zzzz).where the users under Company code xxxx are not supposed to view company code yyyy,zzzz data etc.
    I modified an existing Report and transported to production.But the Authorization Object is not working for that report.The Report is defaultly displaying all the company codes data(xxxx,yyyy) for all the users.But for the other reports its(company code ) is working fine.
    What could be the problem?Is theproblem in transporting the objects.But i transported all the objects inluding auhorization object.
    Please send me the solution as it is very much urgent.
    The solution will be def. awarded with full points.
    Regards
    Sanjay

    hi Sanjay,
    please don't post the same question again, check and response back from your previous thread
    Re: Authorization Object is not working when report is Modified.
    hope this helps.
    would be nice if you reward for helpful answers to all of your previous postings, e.g
    docs related to RRI

  • ME21N Material group level authorization is not working in ECC 6.0

    Dear Security Experts,
    We have created a role Z_ME21N with one Tcode ME21N. The role has to restrict users in the material group level.
    For that, we added Authorization object M_MATE_WGR.
    1.     When we are trying to add field values for {M_MATE_WGR, BEGRU}, generally it should show me the list possible values to be used based on the MM configuration related to Material Authorization Group. We have correctly configured the authorization groups from V_TBRG for M_MATE_WGR. But itu2019s not showing any possible values.
    2.     However we are able to add values manually, but I guess these are not being considered during authorization check and our restriction on Authorization group level in ME21N is not working.
    Test Scenario: We have manually added values 005,007,009,010,013 (which is pointing to specific material group) to BEGRU of M_MATE_WGR. We already assigned this Authorization Object to role Z_ME21N and this role has been assigned to u2018testuseru2019, but the authorization check with the M_MATE_WGR authorization group is not happening. It allows operations on all the material groups.
    Anybody came accross same scenario?
    SAP Prodcut version : ECC 6.0
    Database : SQL Server 2005
    Support pack level : 15
    Please share your views, thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Abu Sandeep

    Dear All,
    I got a reply just now from SAP regarding the same issue.
    I coudnt understand what SAP and you are saying.
    Dear Abu
    *Apologies for the delay. This message has been turned on to application*
    *area of MM from the Basis side just now.*
    *Unfortunately, authorization object "M_MATE_WGR " is not checked*
    *in the purchasing transactions (PR & PO), the system works as standard*
    *functional designed.*
    *Only the following objects are checked in PR/PO:*
    *M_BEST_BSA Document Type in PO M_BANF_BSA Document Type in PR*
    *M_BEST_EKG Purchasing Group in PO M_BANF_EKG Purchasing Group in PR*
    *M_BEST_EKO Purchasing Org. in PO M_BANF_EKO Purchasing Org. in PR*
    *M_BEST_WRK Plant in PO M_BANF_WRK Plant in PR*
    *Setting in check/maintain on in SU24 only means that the profile*
    *generator will propose the object when creating a user, however is*
    *does not mean that M-MATE_WGR will be checked.*
    *Please close this message by pressing the confirm button at your*
    *earliest convenience.*
    *Many thanks in advance for your understanding.*
    So, how can I resolve this problem? John, are you sure that, you implemented this successfully?
    SAP says, this cant be done.
    Regards,
    Abu Sandeep.

  • TS1389 I can't transfer purchase item,every time i tune asks me to authorize the PC and when i authorize, i tune says , this is one pc out of your 5 pc. I followed everty step mentioned in this article but still it does not work.

    I can't transfer purchase item,every time i tune asks me to authorize the PC and when i authorize, i tune says , this is one pc out of your 5 pc. I followed everty step mentioned in this article but still it does not work

    I am having the same problem for one song.  I've tried deauthorizing and then authorizing the computer but it doesn't work.  I can play the song on my iPhone and iPad but not my computer.  Any help here would be greatly appreciated.

  • Authorization object in MV45AFZZ not working

    Hi,
    I am using the aurhorization object C_CREC_WRK in the user exit MV45AFZZ in form USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP to 
    restrict the user at plant level while creating the sales order. While doing so the authorization is not working correctly. I have maintained the appropriate aithorization for the user and plant in PFCG but still its not validating in the exit.
    But if I use the same object in se38 in a z program it work prefect. I am not getting where is the problrm is. is  there any
      restriction for the object in mv45afzz.
    Regards,
    Vaibhav B Gawali.

    When calling the script object that is embedded in the fragment you have to path specifically to that object. The scriptobjectName.method is not enough to find what you want. You would need FragmentName.ScriptObjectName.Method()
    I tried it here and it worked.
    You may want to use a script Fragment instead of using an embedded script object on a fragment. The script fragment would run in the form root context and would behave like you are expecting.

  • Page Authorization Scheme OK button not working

    Hi All,
    I have a Page Level Authorization scheme, which makes a PL/SQL Function call to determine whether the logged in user should have access to the Page. This works well and displays an 'Access denied by Page security check' error message, but the OK Hyperlink that is displayed does not work as I would expect as I am not returned to the calling page.
    The pages in question are Popups and when I hover over the OK Hyperlink, the Javascript in the Taskbar shows javascript:window.history.go(-1). Is this the route of my problem, and is there any way around this when using Popup windows?
    Thanks,
    Mike

    Scott,
    Thanks for your response. Yes you have the sequence right: "User clicks on link to popup page from base page and the link is to a forbidden page"
    "The basic question is why would you ever show a link to a forbidden page to the user?"
    The main reason is time, ideally yes we would like to hide links to forbidden pages but it will take time to implement due to complexity of role combinations and number of pages. So for now, we are confident in our method for denying access to forbidden pages.
    The error message that is displayed on the forbidden page is set in the Authorization Scheme, but how do I alter the OK link? Isn't this generated 'behind the scenes'?
    Thanks,
    Mike

  • ISE authorization Policy not working

    Hi ,
    I have configured the ISE as per the belwo link 
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/110031/central-web-authentication-cwa-guests-ise
    but my authorization policy is not working as when user get connected to guest wlan it get authneticated but when it look for authorization
    it going to default policy it should hit on above policy created screen shot as below

    What version of ISE + patch are you running?. Could you please send an screenshot of AUTH policies including the default --- > USE part?. Are you using customized portal for the first authentication process?
    CWA is pretty straightforward. Only issues I faced was multiple VM (ISE Personas) running on one single server was not replicating properly the AUTHZ policies so I added the PSN persona into the PAN Node and everything worked fine immediately. In addition to that, I realized that I needed at least ONE ENTRY into the ISE PAN Internal Endpoints DB so I could hit the AUTH Policy for MAB & user not found condition which sent me to the AUTHZ = User Unknown + Redirect. Once I authenticated the user using the Default Portal that meant I hit the GUEST FLOW policy. If you are using customized portals for the first authentication process, check: web portal mgmt. --- > Guest --- > MultiPortal Configurations --- > Customized Portal -- > Authentication part.

Maybe you are looking for