Authorization Object to Control access for ContactData in Dispute Managmt

Hello Experts,
Do you know which Authorization Object is necessary to use to be able to control Contact Data available in Dispute Management? Any hint will be much appreciated.
I want to have greyed out the contact data fields (contact person, e-mail, phone and fax number) in change mode.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Hi Ravi,
Thank you very much for your reply, but I have done this already.
Transaction is UDM_DISPUTE but they are so many authorization objects available and none of them seems to be related to contact data. Please kindly check within transaction the part of the screen that I am talking about.
Also check the list of objects in SU24 to Transaction UDM_DISPUTE. Do you know which one is related to 'contact data' part of the screen?
I need to know which authorization object valid to Transaction UDM_DISPUTE is the one related to contact data. Any other idea?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Vanessa Barth.

Similar Messages

Authorization object to control BOM usage ?

Hi ,
Through which authorization object we can control the authorization for BOM usage ?
We have to control authorizations for CS01 through BOM usage Production , PM ,Sales BOM etc...
regards,
madhu kiran

Hi,
The Authorization Object: C_STUE_BER
BOM Usage - STLAN
Generally it will be given as *.
You can restrict the authorizations based on the Usage.
Hope thi helps..
Regards,
Siva

BW 3.5 which authorization objects available rssm (checks for infoprovider)

Hi all,
How does SAP generates the list of authorization objects in RSSM when you enter a specific infoprovider (checks for infoprovider)? Are only the authorization object related to this infoprovider listed?
Is there any documentation about the purpose in RSSM for the button 'update check status (Authorization objects, infoprovider).
thanks for your help.

Based on which criteria?
Is there somwhere detailed documentation available about the RSSM part in BW authorizations? It seems hard to find any...
Thanks,

Cannot modify an authorization object in pfcg role for a business role

Hi Experts,
I have created two z pfcg roles from the standard business role CRM_UIU_SRV_PROFESSIONAL lets say by names zagent and zmanager. My requirement is actually to map these two pfcg roles two a service professional agent and service professional manager custom business roles respectively( I have created these custome business roles from standard business role servicepro) . I have identified an authorization object by name CRM_CO_SE which is basically used to check whether the user is authorized to create service contract transactions. So, in the agent pfcg role, I need to de activate or deselect this particular authorization object so that the agent will not be able to create service contract. (This is not a real time requirement, but an internal assignment). When I change this object in the pfcg by deselecting 'Allow' check box and try to generate, it is not getting generated. I have selected all the options from the 'Expert mode for the profile generation' and still the traffic indicator for that authorization object is yellow. Am I doing anything wrong?
Please help me.
Thanks
Ajith C

Hi Leon,
Thanks for helping me, I have restricted the unauthorized user from creating a new order by disabling the 'New' button by checking the business role in the code. The pfcg configuration, I am skipping it for now. I have one mnore requirement. When one clicks on any items in the search result for the Service Contracts, it opens the details of that service contract with an 'edit' button. I can disable this button using do_output_preparation method for the some business roles. However, I want to disable this after checking a condition. The condition is that, edit button should be active, only if that service order was created by the employee who has currently logged on. I am relatively new to CRM and I could not figure how I can check it during run time. Could any one please help me with this?
Thanks,
Ajith

Authorization object to control plant code in ME54N

Dear All,
Problem: Restrict user "PURAUTALL" userid to release PR's in ME54N for plants "5350" & "5360" only but should be allowed to create/change/display PR's for all other plants including 5350 & 5360.
Analysis: Object M_BANF_FRG is used to control releasing PR's using release codes but how to link up plant codes
Setup:
PURAUTALL userid has access to create/change/display PR's for all plants - M_BANF_WRK is *
PURAUTALL userid has role same as user id but does not contain object M_BANF_FRG in PFCG
Kindly provide suitable solution &/or process to create object M_BANF_FRG in PFCG.
Thx & Reg
Bhushan

Hi Julius,
Thx for replying, actually we havent tried any options because it seems to be a release strategy issue. As of now, thinking to create the object M_BANF_FRG in PFCG and then linking release codes.
But before that business needs to decide to create new release strategies / codes based on plant as characteristics.
If this correct, if any other way out pls help.
Thx
Bhushan

Authorization object to control transaction visibility in a Territory

Hi All ,
We have a requirement where visibility to business transactions should be controlled through the territory structure .
A user should be able to view ( Display only ) all transactions created in the system but should be able to to view as well as edit all those transactions that are created in his territory or a territory under his .
Please let me know if anyone has implemented this functionality and used a standard Auth object like CRM_ORD_TE .
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Please see the online documentation for the setting up of authorizations:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm70/helpdata/en/e9/b29a39e7aee372e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
The section 'Examples for the Authorization Assignment' contains a specific example for how to maintain territory object CRM_ORD_TE.
When setting this up, keep in mind that before object CRM_ORD_TE is checked, first objects CRM_ORD_OP and then CRM_ORD_LP are checked, so authorization must not be granted to the user in these objects first, before the territory object is checked. This is outlined in the Process Flow section of the documentation.
Hope this helps.
Best Regards
Gavin

Object and reference accessing for primitives, objects and collections

Hi,
I have questions re objects, primitives and collection accessing and references
I made a simple class
public class SampleClass {
     private String attribute = "default";
     public SampleClass()
     public SampleClass(SampleClass psampleClass)
          this.setAttribute(psampleClass.getAttribute());
          if (this.getAttribute() == psampleClass.getAttribute())
               System.out.println("INSIDE CONSTRUCTOR : same object");
          if (this.getAttribute().equals(psampleClass.getAttribute()))
               System.out.println("INSIDE CONSTRUCTOR : equal values");
     public void setAttribute(String pattribute)
          this.attribute = pattribute;
          if (this.attribute == pattribute)
               System.out.println("INSIDE SETTER : same object");
          if (this.attribute.equals(pattribute))
               System.out.println("INSIDE SETTER : equal values");
     public String getAttribute()
          return this.attribute;
     public static void main(String[] args) {
...and another...
public class SampleClassUser {
     public static void main(String[] args) {
          SampleClass sc1 = new SampleClass();
          String test = "test";
          sc1.setAttribute(new String(test));
          if (sc1.getAttribute() == test)
               System.out.println("SampleClassUser MAIN : same object");
          if (sc1.getAttribute().equals(test))
               System.out.println("SampleClassUser MAIN : equal values");
          SampleClass sc2 = new SampleClass(sc1);
          sc1.setAttribute("test");
          if (sc2.getAttribute() == sc1.getAttribute())
               System.out.println("sc1 and sc2 : same object");
          if (sc2.getAttribute().equals(sc1.getAttribute()))
               System.out.println("sc1 and sc2 : equal values");
}the second class uses the first class. running the second class outputs the following...
INSIDE SETTER : same object
INSIDE SETTER : equal values
SampleClassUser MAIN : equal values
INSIDE SETTER : same object
INSIDE SETTER : equal values
INSIDE CONSTRUCTOR : same object
INSIDE CONSTRUCTOR : equal values
INSIDE SETTER : same object
INSIDE SETTER : equal values
sc1 and sc2 : equal values
...i'm just curios why the last 3 lines are the way they are.
INSIDE SETTER : same object
INSIDE SETTER : equal values
sc1 and sc2 : equal values
how come while inside the setter method, the objects are the same object, and after leaving the setter method are not the same objects?
Can anyone point a good book that shows in detail how objects, primitives and collections are referenced, especially when passed to methods. Online reference is preferred since the availability of books can be a problem for me.
Thanks very much

You are confusing references with objects.
This compares two object references:
if( obj1 == obj2 ) { // ...Whereas this compares two objects:
if( obj1.equals(obj2) ) { // ...A reference is a special value which indicates where in memory two objects happen to be. If you create two strings with the same value they won't be in the same place in memory:
String s1 = new String("MATCHING");
String s2 = new String("MATCHING");
System.out.println( s1 == s2 ); // false.But they do match:
System.out.println( s1.equals(s2) ); // trueIf you're using a primitive then you're comparing the value that you're interested in. E.g.
int x = 42;
int y = 42;
System.out.println(x == y); // trueBut if you're comparing references you're usually more interested in the objects that they represent that the references themselves.
Does that clarify matters?
Dave.

Is there centralized control access for html5 notifications permissions?

the desktop notifications permissions used by websites to control the creation of desktop notifications—for things like email and twitter—seems to have no centralized control. looking around i found the permissions manager (about:permissions) and the alert slide effect toggle in about:config but neither of these seem to have the permissions for the display of notifications.
as far as i can tell the only place i can go to control these permissions are the individual pages themselves for which the permission was granted, under the page info > permissions tab. this would be fine but if i wanted to revoke this/these permissions globally i would need to remember and revisit all websites to which i had granted the permission.
permissions manager seems like it was made for just such a purpose: to centrally locate global and individual permissions granted to websites. but the websites that i have granted this permission do not even show up in the list. i find this curious as in those pages "view page info" > permissions tab the same permissions that other sites have that are listed in permissions manager are listed directly above the notifications permission in the page info window.
is there a centralized control for the notifications permission? if yes; where is it? if no; could it please be implemented?
chrome has notification permission control in their advanced settings. easy to find. not like about:permissions.

i should have stated in my original question: i am using firefox 27.0.1. my addons/extensions consist almost entirely of privacy and developer themed addons ie: noscript, priv3, ghostery, firebug, jsonview, and html validator.
the exceptions button you referred to in the security tab is not for allowing collective things. that button is for listing the sites allowed/denied to install addons. i checked every page and every button in the options window before i started looking online for information about notifications. that is how i found the about:permissions page.
the functionality of notifications i refer to is built into firefox. it is not from a addon/extension as the desktop notifications work while i am running in safe mode. so no, it is not a third party addon. if it were then the management of the permissions it is granted would be done through it. there are likely addons i could get for desktop notifications but i doubt they would be using the html5 spec notifications feature and thus not useful for my purposes.
for reference the specific website that brought this feature to my attention and hence the management thereof was mail.google.com. on the general tab of the settings page for your inbox allows you to turn on or off desktop notifications of incoming mail as it is received. if you turn on the notifications the browser will ask you to grant or deny permission to the site for the display of notifications. a few days later i was thinking about these notifications and was curious how i would go about revoking the permission after it had been granted. i knew how to turn off the display of notifications by gmail, but that was not the same as revoking the permission. this search ultimately led me here.
as i stated before the permissions of a site can be viewed by looking at the page info > permissions tab, accessible from the right click menu on the page. this however, as guigs2 found, seems to be the only place where the notifications permission is found. if it were also available on the about:permissions page that would satisfy my desire for a centralized control system of the notifications permission.

Authorization Object for using Object Services

Can you tell me how to limit a users authorization to create or delete attachements using the object services functionality? We'd like to control the addition and deletion of the attachments. Is there a specific authorization object for this functionality?
Thank you, Julie

Hi julie;
I hope that following are the solution for you problem. Check wheather this is helpful to you or not.
Authorization Object C_DRAW_BGR (Authorization Group)
The following table shows authorization object C_DRAW_BGR. This authorization object allows you to limit access to individual documents.
Fields      Possible Values      Description
BEGRU (Authorization group)      0000 - ZZZZ      Used to restrict the authorizations for document maintenance further.
Authorization object C_DRAW_BGR can be used to restrict access to individual documents. It works like a simple on/off switch. If the check of object C_DRAW_BGR is fine, the user's authorization can be further restricted by checking C_DRAW_TCD (check only based on the document type) or C_DRAW_TCS (check of the
combination of document type and status). At the fifth level there is a BADI called DOCUMENT_AUTH01, which you can use to design your own authority check.
Authorization Object C_DRAW_DOK (Document Access)
The following table shows authorization object C_DRAW_DOK. This authorization object controls which original data of a specific document type there are access authorizations for.
Fields      Possible Values      Description
ACTVT (Activity)      52 53 54 55 56 57      Change application start Display application start Display archive application Change archive application Display archive Store archive
DOKAR (Document type)            Here you enter the document type that access to original data is allowed for.
Authorization Object C_DRAD_OBJ (Object Link)
The following table shows authorization object C_DRAD_OBJ. This object controls which users can process which document info records, based on a combination of activity, object, and status.
Fields      Possible Values      Description
ACTVT (Activity)      01 02 03 06      Create Change Display Delete
DOKOB (Object)            You must enter the data base table for the objects here (for example, MARA for material record).
STATUS (Document status)
if useful rewards points.
Regards,
nitin
Edited by: nitin bhagat on Feb 18, 2008 6:23 AM

Authorization object for ML81N

Hi
I am trying to know what is the authorization object that controls :
when going to transaction ML81N and you click on the colorful icon on the right (configuration) it opens the table settings window
what is the authorization object for the administrator button
regards

well.......to be honest, i did my research based on some intuition and some research
I know that the settings could be changed not only for the transaction you mentioned, but i remember that i was taught that this could be changed for Sales order transactions too, which suggests that this is not bound to a specific transaction but more on a "generic plane"
whenver it is system wide settings, the first think i check for (just a habit) is on S_ADMI_FCD, earlier experiences taught me a lot on the importance of this object, make sure that you never have a * for this object (at least that is my personal learning and opinion)
Good luck for the future

Authorization object for Notification Disconnect button

Hi Group
Do We have any authorization object which control
Notification Disconnect button in IW32 Order Header screen

Refer below screen shot.
While trying to remove order assignment from notification, above shown error message has come. Hope, this is what you are expecting both in assignment as well as removal of assignment.
Check your roles & assignment of appropriate field values in those roles. If you are not comfortable in PFCG, discuss with Basis consultants.
Check Authorization Object I_VORG_MEL as well for the previously mentioned values.

Authorization Object to access

Dear All,
Please can anybody help to find the authorization object required to access HR_DK_GET_LEAVE_ENTITLEMENT function module.
Kind regards
Mithun Sharma

Hi Mithun,
Actually the function modules do not check for authorizations. To execute this most probably u will require authorization for SE37.
The following auth objs are required for SE37.
S_DATASET    ACTVT
S_DATASET    FILENAME
S_DATASET    PROGRAM
S_DEVELOP    ACTVT      01
S_DEVELOP    ACTVT      02
S_DEVELOP    ACTVT      03
S_DEVELOP    ACTVT      06
S_DEVELOP    ACTVT      07
S_DEVELOP    DEVCLASS   $*
S_DEVELOP    DEVCLASS   *
S_DEVELOP    DEVCLASS   T*
S_DEVELOP    DEVCLASS   Y*
S_DEVELOP    DEVCLASS   Z*
S_DEVELOP    OBJNAME    *
S_DEVELOP    OBJTYPE    FUGR
S_DEVELOP    OBJTYPE    FUNC
S_DEVELOP    P_GROUP    *
It would be better if u can clarify in which context u need this.
Regards

Authorization OBject for Delete and Lock indicator in PO function.

Hiii
I'm using sap 5.0. I'm notice that we can set the authorization object to control the user from make a action for delete/Lock indicator in purchase order so that we can prevent the 'unpredictable user' from do the deletion on item PO item.
it also help me to authorize the selected user to perform delete or lock action.

Hi,
To prevent deletion or locking in specifically may not be controlled thro authorisation but changing the PO can be controlled.For this the authorisation objects M_BEST_BSA, M_BEST_EKG,M_BEST_EKO,M_BEST_WRK may be looked into .Here against Activity there is option like create,change ,delete,print etc which if suitably assigned can restrict the users for certain activity.Try with your basis team in this objects.
Dhruba

Authorization Object for "Install" button in the Business Content

Hi..
Is there an Authorization Object which controls the "Install" button in the
RSA1 -> Business Content tab
I want to restrict developers to Install business content in BW Quality client and BW Production client.
If a developer clicks the "Install" button, in the Business Content, it should say, "You do not have authorization for the Administrator Workbench Object".
Is there any Authorization Object for this?
Thanks,
Sai.

Its better you go for SE16 and type table name TOBJT, and try to serach for required auth object.

Authorization object for ABC Indicator

HI Experts,
May we know what is the Authorization Object we can use for ABC Indicator in Equipment?
Thanks,

Hi bonsai,
Sorry for delay response..
Authorization keys which you can use to set up authorization checks when you manually set or delete a user status.
After creating the status profile.create individula authorization key in the lower menu node where u hv created the User status .
Then assign the authorization key to the each status codes(Last column of the status profile).(Crete authorization key same as the status codes).
Then maintain the authorization key value in the field BERSL where u want to give the authority for change /Delete user status.
Regards
Dhiren

Authorization Object to Control access for ContactData in Dispute Managmt

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for