Auto-elimination of intercompany profit in inventory - how to eliminate IC balance via rules?

Hi Experts:
I’ve designed and developed a data form in HFM to calculate the amount of MARGIN in the inventory of the receiving company (when the receiving company has received the inventory from an intercompany partner).
Does anyone have any experience or ideas how to write a rule (or use IC logic) to automatically eliminate this calculated amount against IC Cost of Sales?
The IC Cost of Goods sold entry will be the same at the margin in inventory (but this is not broken out separately in any account – just buried in COGS).
Does anyone have any suggestions for a rule/account/IC logic that could automatically grab this calculated balance in inventory and remove it from inventory as well as reduce IC_COGS?
We prefer to do this elim entry automatically if possible.    Is it possible to do an “auto” journal entry that could grab these amounts?    Or could we use a rule to populate an IC account so that this would self eliminate?
Should we set up an elim account part and populate them automatically via rules, then allow HFM to use it's built in IC elim logic?   This issue is that this entry occurs all on one entity, but I know it's possible to set up IC accounts so that you can book a balance with yourself.
How do I do this elim entry automatically in HFM?
Inventory
$    (1,000)  this will be calculated in HFM.
IC_COGS
$      1,000   this will equal to above account
Thanks,
Mark

Hi. Try this. Tag it as an intercompany account (use Y instead of R) and give it a plug account. Put the plug account within COGS. Basically you're doing a one-sided elimination.
Elimination of profit in inventory is not easy, and if this solves things for you then you're on the easy side of it.
Regards,
Eric

Similar Messages

  • Intercompany profit in inventory

    Hi, we are on a manufacturing business and im trying to explore the system for ways and means to monitor and track the IPI (intercompany profit in inventory) resulting from intercompany sales.  This is the elimination from the inventory account (Balance Sheet aspect) of any profit or loss on the intercompany sale that has not been confirmed by resale of the inventory to outsiders (non-affiliate).
    We are using SEM-BCS (trading partner and partner profit center fields) for the process of eliminating the intercompany profits and loss on the Income Statement aspect.
    Appreciate your expertise and inputs on this.
    thanks and regards,
    jing

    Hi. Try this. Tag it as an intercompany account (use Y instead of R) and give it a plug account. Put the plug account within COGS. Basically you're doing a one-sided elimination.
    Elimination of profit in inventory is not easy, and if this solves things for you then you're on the easy side of it.
    Regards,
    Eric

  • ECCS - Intercompany Profit Elimination of Inventory Transfers

    Hi Consolidation Gurus,
    We are trying to eliminate intercompany profits on inventory transfers. We are using the Additional Financial Data and created Product Groups like Machines, Parts etc. How complicated is it to use Reported Financial Data? Is it possible to get profit elim at each item level?
    How do we go about doing the profit elim? Could somebody explain in detail how the intercompany profit is set up(customising) and how exactly it works? What are the steps involved in setting it up? Also, how do we use the flexible upload file? Is there any format for uploading this?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks.
    SV

    We are going to implement SEM-BCS - So i wanted to know the details of interprofit elimination in detail during the blueprinting process.
    Traditional R/3 for inter company transactions is you create one account for each CC and check that account to see the amount that's due from that CC
    With Trading partner functionality, you will be having one single account for all transactions with all the Co Cds and if you want the balance of a particular Co Cd, you do it with by checking the A/C and the Trading Partner(Company ID).
    Am i correct in saying so ? Correct me if i am wrong anywhere.
    How would things be taken care in BCS? is what i wanted to know.
    Thanks,
    Nandita

  • Intercompany Profit eliminations

    Hi Experts
    I am working on intercompany profit elimination and trying to understand how it works.
    We have implemented intercompany profit elimiation for US and trying to work for other countries. My client is using Dual costing for materials to record profit made in intercompany and later to eliminate (I/C profit elimination) at month end.
    Can any one explain how does this work ?
    Thanks
    Deepa

    Hello Deepa!  I too am just beginning to work on our intercompany profit elimination techniques using 4.7 in SAP and Material Ledger actual costing.  We previously set up 3 currencies.  The currencies are as follows:
    10 - Called Local currency.  this currency will include the profit in the cost estimate and std of the transferred parts.
    30 - Called Group currency.  This one is a straight conversion to the group currency (if different) at the exchange rates provided in the rate table.
    31 - Called Group at Group.  This currency is expected to provide the cost estimate standard cost of all inventory without the extra profit layer. 
    So, we have a couple of things that must happen.  We need a layer within the cost estimate that gets picked up in currencies 10 and 30, but not in 31.  I believe this behavior is handled by the way the layer is created.  If we use Additive Costs, the Accounting department would add the profit layer to the cost estimate for the normal costing variant.  We would not apply an additive cost layer for the other costing variant that applies to the 31 currency.  The other thing is that we then need to find a report that shows the currencies with (30) and without (31) intercompany profit layer.  This report will show us the remaining intercompany profit layer in inventory which should be eliminated.
    That is the basic strategy we are going to test with.  Another way we plan on adding the layer is to use Purchasing Information Records (PIR) - Pricing Conditions.  If we can get the PIR pricing conditions to work as described above using Additive Costs, we can hand off the daily maintenance to the purchasing side of the organization.  This is just another option to explore.
    If you have arrived at any additional epiphanies, please let me know.
    David

  • Elimination of Interunit Profit/Loss in Transferred Inventory

    Hello Experts
    Need to create the task to Elimination of Interunit Profit/Loss in Transferred Inventory,
    question;
    How to create the data collection of Flexible Upload by Product Group?
    What data type? and the cost of the product also will be Flexible Upload?
    Tks

    yeah, Eugene, i'm surprised but i will take whatever i get ;-)...
    are you that 'stingy' or is it the SDN which limits the points for non-original posts&replies?
    i'm only kidding...good to know someone is monitoring the forum while most questions are in BPM and HANA corners.

  • How to cost intercompany in-transit inventory

    Hi-
    I am not very famaliar with MM, I usually am FI.  I have a question about doing an intercompany transfer of inventory from one company code to another - US to Canada.  We are doing a STO that moves it.  When the transfer happens, I can see in my accounting documents that it is coming out of the US inventory.
    It is going to a In Transit inventory location.  I was expecting to see the value of the inventory also being recorded on the receiving company but I don't see it until the receipt is made in Canada.
    Have I missed something, why don't I see this inventory cost being picked up in the receiving company.  Thanks.

    Hello,
    From what i see you are using a 2 step STO process and hence its normal to see the inventory in trasit till the receiving plant does a GR.
    However if your requirement is to see a accounting document immediately you should  use a 1 step STO process where the GI from the sending plant will create a GR in the receiving plant. This is recommended only if the plants are located close to each other. In your case as the transfer is across 2 countries, it is bes that you use the 2 step process.
    Hope this clarifies.
    Regards,
    Jimmy Ambooken

  • Missing Elimination of Interunit Profit/Loss Functions

    The function for Elimination of Interunit Profit/Loss in Transferred Inventory and Elimination of Interunit Profit/Loss in Transferred Assets is not available at the consolidation function. Does anyone know how do I activate this function or configure it?
    I am using SEM 6. Thanks in advance.
    Edited by: Kooi Heng Ooi on Jan 22, 2008 3:22 AM

    If I have not properly configure and generate the data basis from first time, what should I do to activate this function. As I checked the sap.help from your link it said :
    Prerequisites
    ·       You have defined the Customizing settings for the data basis.
    ¡      You have specified which InfoObjects are to be used for noncurrent assets at Assets/Liabilities on the Data Model tab page. (See the respective field help texts.)
    ¡      You have set up the data streams Noncurrent Assets, Noncurrent Assets – Consolidated, and Transfer of Noncurrent Assets on the Data Streams tab page.
    ¡      If applicable, you have selected additional subassignments and custom fields on the Data Stream Fields tab page.
    ·       You have defined the Customizing settings for the consolidation area. In Settings, you have selected the indicator for elimination of interunit profit/loss in transferred assets under Consolidation Functions Used.
    Problem is now I could not do these prerequisites, hitting the errors as mentioned above.
    All your help are greatly appreciated

  • Elimination of Interunit Profit/Loss

    Hello,
    We are doing elimination of unrealized profit.  We cannot eliminate all though for a certain cons group 'ASIA'
    Hierarchy is as follows:
    WORLD
         APAC
              ASIA  
    World and Apac eliminations are okay.  I noticed that there are inconsistencies for the journal entries posted in Asia during elimination.  For World and Apac, the inventory items included per document are the same.  But for Asia, it will include both inventory items.  And when repeating the elimination task, the figures just cancel out and it will post a different one. 
    I'm wondering if this is the correct behavior?  I'm thinking that inventory items should be the same per document posted.
    Example:
    Inventory items: 111 
                            222
    Journal entries:
    document1     comp1     APAC     111     100.00
                         comp2     APAC     111     150.00
                         comp3     APAC     111     200.00
    document2     comp1     APAC     222     200.00
                         comp2     APAC     222     150.00
                         comp3     APAC     222     200.00
    document3     comp1     ASIA     111     100.00
                         comp2     ASIA     111     150.00
                         comp3     ASIA     222     300.00
    During repeat task:
    document4     ref document3     comp1     ASIA     111     -100.00
                                                  comp2     ASIA     111      -150.00
                                                  comp3     ASIA     222     -300.00
    document5                              comp1     ASIA     222      200.00
                                                  comp2     ASIA     222      250.00
                                                  comp3     ASIA     111      200.00
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Jean

    Hi Eugene,
    Thanks for your inputs. Indeed it was not the correct behavior because we found a relevant sapnote saying that we have to apply a program correction.  After applying sapnote 1158342, elimination worked fine.

  • Elimination of Interunit Profit/Loss in BPC 10?

    Hi, all,
    how it is possible to set up an
    Elimination of Interunit Profit/Loss task in BPC 10?
    Thanks in advance and best regards
    Gerd

    Hi Gerd,
    For that, basically you need two types of data. First one is data at account level, i.e. total sales. Second one is data at partner level, i.e. sales to each company. For this, "Partner" dimension is used.
    The business rule will eliminate transactions with partners that are included in consolidation scope. Partner's that are included in scope are identified with ownership model.
    For more detailed explanations, I would suggest you to explore Starter Kit documents which you can find in following link:
    SAP Business Planning and Consolidation 10.0, Version for SAP NetWeaver – SAP Help Portal Page
    Especially this one is related with the configuration.
    https://websmp202.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700001096592013E/BPCNW10_IFRS_Config_SP5.pdf
    If it is possible, it is even better if you could load Starter Kit to your BPC system and explore the ELIM business rule.

  • My I phone 6 auto zoomed everything on my home page how do I fix this

    my I phone 6 auto zoomed everything on my home page how do I fix this

    If you are talking about your background wallpaper then its because the picture resolution is bigger than the screen resolution of your iPhone.  When setting your background wallpaper, you can choose a picture from your camera/presets and then you can drag it around on the screen until you have the desired cropped photo for your background.  If this is unacceptable then you would need to shrink the photo's resolution somehow, which is easy I think but I am not qualified to give you an explanation having never attempted.
    Justin

  • Material R-B100 1000 0001 blocked due to a physical inventory,How unlock?

    Dear All,
    I  use T-code:MB1A to issue goods for product order.
    the erro information as follows:
    Material R-B100 1000 0001 blocked due to a physical inventory
    Message no. M7100
    Diagnosis
    Material R-B100 is blocked in plant 1000, storage location 0001, due to a physical inventory.
    how could I unlock?
    Thanks & Regards ,
    Candy

    hi,
    Goto MI04 and select material and enter other input so that you will get inventery document. from the document enter your physical count and save the same .
    if you follow the above step your issue will be solved.
    reg
    mrs

  • While composing email, keep getting "Unable to save as a draft" every 30 seconds. I've disable auto save and it didn't help.How can I stop this message?

    While composing email, keep getting "Unable to save as a draft" every 30 seconds. I've disable auto save and it didn't help.How can I stop this message?

    Mike,
    Thank you for taking the time to look at my app. This is my last major stumbling block that I have to resolve for this and other forms in the app.
    Actually, I did use the Form Wizard for Auto DML to originally create the form. It was great. It created most of the Buttons, Items and Validations automatically (basically most of the page). I just needed to create some Processes and Computations. Two of which were the Processes to update the 'create_dt' and 'created_by' fields and 'update_dt' and 'updated_by' fields. The Create process updates the fields just fine.
    However, my problem seems to be that the Hidden 'create_dt' and 'created_by' fields aren't picking up the values from a record that is being editted. Then when I attempt to save the record those fields are NULL, causing the DB NOT NULL constraint to throw an exception for those fields. In the back of my mind I seem to remember seeing some post stating something to the effect that the information in fields with a Source Type of Database Column is just displayed and does not affect Session State items.
    Even with that, I am still wondering just why the 'created_by' Page Item shows the value that is in the DB record being updated, but the 'create_dt" does not (as can be seen in my first posting). It is the 'create_dt' Page Item (:P205_CREATE_DT) not having the DB records 'create_dt' info in it that appears to be the problem.
    Thanks,
    Tom

  • How to see Trial Balance for a Segment

    Hi Experts,
    Does anybody has idea on how to see Triala Balance for a Segment ?
    In Standard Reports for Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss, SAP B1 has provided option for filtering on Segment, but the same is not true for Trial Balance.
    BR
    Samir Gandhi

    Hi Samir,
    yes it is possible to display Trial Balance in Segment format.
    open Trial Balance Report, in the Upper right hand of the of the window next to G/L Accounts you can find the "FIND" button, click that one then the Find G/L Account window opens. from this window you cans Select Segmentation accounts.
    regards,
    Fidel

  • How can I set up a rule to delete all messages older than 6 months left in Apple Mail's main inbox?

    How can I set up a rule to delete all messages older than 6 months left in Apple Mail's main inbox?
    I have created other rules to move some of my daily messages into specific folders and I don't wish to auto-delete those.
    Just the general stuff that keeps piling up in my me.com main email box.  Mail such as FB announcements and other low priority stuff I want to look at before deleting but don't want to keep longer than a week or month.
    TIA
    thokitts

    Thanks, but I am looking for a more automated solution than hand marking emails as junk. I might as well move them to the trash myself.
    Again, these are emails I want to receive and quickly read, but not keep longer than a week or month or so. By setting a rule to toss any older than 30 days back then my Mail program (and thus my hard drive) won't be wasting so much space. For example, currently I have over 6000 read messages, with their attachments, in my main email box. I'd rather not have to physically attend to sorting the one I don't want out.
    The one I do keep for other reasons get moved into other folders.
    It seems this should be possible.
    thokitts

  • Profit Center : Reflect - Vendor, Customer, Bank/Cash Balance

    Dear Experts,
    Ref. : Reflect - Vendor, Customer, Bank/Cash Balance, Balance Sheet GL Accounts - Profit Center wise.
    When we do postings to P&L Items, we assign a CO / Cost Object. Such Cost objects may be Orders, Cost Centers, etc., which has a Profit Center assigned to it.
    Now, we wish to view Balance Profit Center wise.
    My Concerns :
    1.  Can Vendor, Customer, Bank/Cash Balance, Balance Sheet GL Accounts - Profit Center wise. Since we do not assign CO objects to such line items, but the correspondense line items (P&L GL) has a CO object.
    2.  If yes, how do we move balance of such items, to Profit Center / profit Center wise.
    Experts, please help me to understand the concept.
    Regards,
    Hussein.

    Hi,
    Are you in ECC activated new G/L? If yes, then you can define Profit Center as Document Splitting Characteristic for General Ledger and profit center will be in the AR/AP line item as well in ledger view (though you don't enter profit center during document entry).
    You cannot give the Profit center in line item level to the Subledger accounts like vendor and customers.Vendor and customer accounts take the profit center from the offsetting entry.If want to see the profit center to the particular document, open the document go to Environment field and select Balance Sheet Adjustment option.
    If you want to see the Profit center wise payables and receivables, use T.code GR55 and take report group 8A90 for Periodic Receivables and 8A91 for Payable.
    If you want to see the all payables with Profit center use Table BFOK_A for vendors BFOD_A for customers.
    Regards,
    Viswa

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem with display of ampersand in reports

    I enter the following text into a "notes" item on a page: Send request to AT&T. When I use this notes item in a report the following is displayed: Send request to AT Note the ampersand and the T are missing. If I remove the period at the end of the n

  • Best Practice for FlexConnect Wireless roaming in MediaNet environment?

    Hello! Current Cisco best practice recommendations for enterprise MediaNet design, specify that VLANs be local to a switch / switch stack (i.e., to limit the scope of spanning-tree).  In the wireless world, this causes problems if you want users whil

  • TC starts to restore then stops - Pls Help!

    The hard drive in my early '08 MBP died the other day, so I switched it out for a new one.  After hooking up the new HD I put in the install disc, ran disc utility, erased the drive, which set up a partition, and restarted.  I then picked a language

  • Archivelink Signature Public Exponent

    Hi guys, I am trying to generate a certificate for signing the URL for the Archivelink interface. The documentation stated that the public exponent has to be equal to (2^16)+1. Does anybody know how important that condition is? The reason I am asking

  • Is Query Rewrite being used?

    How do I check if query rewrite is being used? This is an 8174 database. When I run explain plan on the query used to create the MV, the plan shows all the tables/indexes to be used. It doesn't show the MV name in the explain plan. Is this the correc