AVCHD or HDV for your Editing?

Hi,
when come to the Editing stage, which is the format that you work pretty well and easier, HDV or AVCHD?

what media are you using? solid sate? (non-tape)?
I use use HDV (SONY V1E) and AVCHD (CANON HF100) but edit both in ProRes. ProRes is a very high quality editing codec, up to about 145Mb/s or 225Mb/s (HQ) which is going to be way more than your source footage. You can only ingest material as ProRes not ProRes (HQ).. but this wont be an issue as mentioned above.
Once your material is ingested FCP will auto detect your sequence settings once you start to place your clips in the timeline.
Tip (slightly off topic): Check your sequence Render settings: bit depth, if you are working with high qulaity graphics or serious about colour correction best to use the higher 10bit setting (from 8bit or RGB), and set your render quality to BEST (from Normal).

Similar Messages

  • AVCHD or HDV for Premiere Pro CS4?

    Hi,
    I have a P4, 2.8Ghz, 2G Ram with XP Pro. I hear rumblings that AVCHD is kinda a nightmare with Premiere CS4 in terms of playback stutter. Ultimately I want the least frustrating editing experience I can have with PPCS4. I'm prone to punching my desk if things get too bogged or buggy while dealing with software so I guess my question is this: Would PPCS4 be happier with AVCHD or HDV given my system?
    Thanks,
    Matt.

    Matt,
    I had a heftier machine than that and AVCHD was completely unworkable. As mentioned, you need some serious horses if you're going to do HD.
    Based on a lot of excellent advice here (meaning solid, useful info even if it wasn't what I wanted to hear) I bought a heftier box and CS4 / AVCHD works just dandy now.
    If you can't afford a new box, I'd convert your footage to SD and work in that format, or you'll have bloody knuckles from punching your desk all day.
    And I second the reference to John, Hunt and Harm posts on hardware matters with great enthusiasm.

  • Strategy for managing edited photos

    I have never used a non-destructive editor before. So I am wondering what a good strategy would be for managign allthe originals plus the edited versions. It seems to me that could get out of control very quick.
    I am using version 5 and I mostly intend to clean up my photos and post them to Flickr or something like that. Usually full resolution.
    Thanks

    There are a few different approaches you can take in seperating the edited photos from the un-edited ones.
    The first thing to note is that all edits are non-destructive, so it's not necessary to organize them seperately from un-edited copites of the image.
    If you like to compare edited from non-edited versions you can view before and after shots in the Develop module:
    You can also save you edits as a Snapshot to come back to and view later:
    Photos with an adjustment applied will have the following icon, so that you can immediately know if they are edited or untouched:
    These are all great ways of distingishing edits you've made to your images. However, if you'd still like to seperate them, you can create seperate collections for your edited photos:
    To do this, I would start by creating a Collection Set for all the images in that upload.
    From there, you can create collections that will be organized underneath that Collection Set
    From there, you can make as many collections as you would like.
    For example:
    All images - unedited
    Best images - unedited
    Best of the Best - unedited
    Best of the Best - edited
    or however you would like to organize them!
    JUST REMEMBER that all of these collections and groups that you are making are not effecting how your images are being organized on the back end. It's up to you to choose the right place for your images, and if you move them or remove them they will not be available in Lightroom as Lightroom does not save copies of your images, and only meta data for your oranizations and adjustments.
    Hope this helps!
    Julia

  • For composite editing, does DVCPRO yield better quality than AVCHD in FCE4?

    Hi folks,
    From what I understand, DVCPRO is much less compressed than AVCHD. If so, then, would it also be true that FCE4 would output a "cleaner" end product (i.e. for DVD, after undergoing significant composite editing/rendering) if I used DVCPRO rather than AVCHD? (It's my understanding that you should start with the highest quality... least compressed... raw footage as possible for composite editing).
    Thanks, in advance, for your expertise!
    Vic

    Panasonic does not make a camera with the HFC-150 model designation. Do you mean the AG HMC-150?
    If so, the camera records AVCHD (which is a VERY highly compressed format) and which will need to be translated into AIC to run in FCE. AIC was designed to deal with long GOP formats starting with mpeg 2 HDV. Its great value is it translates that difficult to edit frame structure into an all "I" frame format. However, it was not the most graceful format for color detail.
    Having said that, while the HMC-150 is capable of very good images, most consumer video is so badly recorded (really poor lighting, wandering auto white balance, wandering auto focus, hand shake, etc) there is no way one can tell what the camera is capable of let alone if one codec is better than another for output.
    If you already have FCE, see what the material looks like. You may find it perfectly adequate, even splendid in telling your stories.
    If you want to see other options, I believe Premiere has a trial version and Apple has a trial of FCX. Do your own A/B/C comparision.
    Have fun.
    x

  • HDV mixed format editing and mastering for broadcast TV

    Hi
    I have HDV blues with regards mixed format and multi time base.
    Any help advice will be greatly appreciated.
    I have never handled HDV in multiformat and multiple timebase to Mater and output for Broadcast television.
    I am hoping to master to DVD directly on the configuration ( details provided below ) to deliver to NTSC and PAL market for DVD retail.
    However I would need to take to a post house, one or more quicktime file to Output to Digital Betacam for television broadcast for both NTSC and PAL formats.
    with regards
    problems I am facing are on two fronts:
    1) I am unsure of best quality and workflow to output master on Digital Betacam tape for broadcast TV in NTSC and PAL both formats.
    2) With sequence set at HDV 1080 50i, and export setting as current setting, upon render and export of self contained quicktime direct from FCP timeline I face few troubling symptoms;
    - that the quicktime exports 3mins to 35 minutes of qt clip but not the whole program of 90 minutes as one clip. System crashes and I have to reboot.
    - Another symptom is that by doing above my time line shows aduio as out of sync to video. here i see that Audio tracks A1,A2 as being torn apart at cut edit points and have gap of 1 frame at random ( but not on all edit points ).
    A3, A4 and other music and sound fx tracks have slipped off sync by few frames , again at random and also other places the edit comes back in sync with audio.
    - Of course I am having to re- render this sequence timeline a zillion times even though the previously rendered files still exist in relevant folder.
    Program duration: 90 minutes
    current sequence : 1440 x 1080 at 50i
    edit sequence time-line consists following source material directly ingested from tape via firewire in native HDV and DV:
    VIDEO
    -HDV footage of 1440 x 1080, 50i
    -HDV footage of 1440 x 1080, 60i
    -PAL footage standard and widescreen
    -NTSC footage standard and widescreen
    - still images
    AUDIO
    -AUDIO is 16 bits , 48Khz
    - Voice Over is 24 bit , 48 Khz
    Software: Final Cut Pro version 6
    QT: 7.4.1
    System configuration:
    1) Mackbook pro: OS 10.4.11
    graphics/ display card: GeForce 8600M GT
    Hardware Overview:
    Model Name: MacBook Pro
    monitor: one apple cinema display 23 inch
    Model Identifier: MacBookPro3,1
    Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
    Processor Speed: 2.4 GHz
    Number Of Processors: 1
    Total Number Of Cores: 2
    L2 Cache (per processor): 4 MB
    Memory: 4 GB
    Bus Speed: 800 MHz
    2) Mac pro: dual core, 2.3 ghz, 3GB RAM
    two apple cinema display 23 inch
    All project media residing in 1TB Lacie 800 firewire external disk.

    Hi guys, thanks for getting back to me. My client has now changed her mind and so I'm just mixing XDCAM and HDV 16:9 footage which is absolutely fine. Awesome. Thanks for your help!
    I have one issue - some of the XDCAM footage she has given me is .MP4 video (actually each clip is a folder with 5 files in it (.MP4, .SMI, .PPN, .XML, .BIM). Do I have to convert the .MP4 into .MOV via Compressor to work with it (presumably this will compress it somewhat) or can I convert it simply and losslessly somehow (perhaps using sony XDCAM software?)
    Thanks again for any help!
    Oliver

  • I have AVI files that I need to be MOV files so that I can edit them in Final Cut Pro. I am going to use Quick Time Pro for this....do I have to 'export' it or can I just 'save as', or is there even a difference? Thanks in advance for your help!

    I have AVI files that I need to convert to MOV files so that I can edit them in Final Cut Pro. I am going to use Quick Time Pro for this....When I have the files open in QT Pro do I have to 'export' it or can I just 'save as', or is there even a difference? Thanks in advance for your help!

    I strongly recommend you use compressor to do the conversion (if it will open the files - since quicktime will open them, it will more than likely do it.
    Compressor allows you to customize presets and save them and apply them to multiple files.  Although the interface may seem daunting, it's actually pretty simple.
    Even if you can edit the avi in fcp, it's not a good idea.  Liable to cause problems down the road. 

  • Looking for a new toy to help your editing workflow?  Try this!

    I recently ditched my simple 2-button + scroll wheel mouse for a mouse on steroids: the Logitech G700.  What a difference!  It has 11 customizable functions that can be automatically activated depending on the program you're in!  So you can have a completely unique set of functions for Premiere, Photoshop, AE, Windows, etc, and each set will automatically/instantly be activated whenever that specific program/interface is the active one!
    Here are my 2 layouts to give you some ideas:
    Premiere Pro Layout:
    Windows Layout:
    You can even assign multi-step macros to keys.  For example, I set one of the keys to: Deselect clips + Add Default Video Transition.  So now, a single keypress will always apply my default video transition to the CTI, even if any clips were selected, just the way it worked in CS6 and I wanted it to keep working in CC!
    If you're looking for a simple inexpensive way to improve your editing work, I highly recommend getting a programmable mouse like this one!  If anyone has any other hardware devices that help their workflow, please share so that we can all benefit from the knowledge.
    Cheers!

    I am in the market for a new PC for my wife, and she will be inheriting the keyboard and mouse I am using now so I can get new ones. She picked these out to begin with since we were sharing a computer for a while so she will be happy with them.
    That looks like a really great mouse. I may just have to take your advice on this one.
    Although the newer version looks even cooler: http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-G700s-Rechargeable-Gaming-Mouse/dp/B00BFOEY3Y/ref=dp_ob_tit le_ce
    My wife would HATE that mouse, but since she will finally have her own again, I can get any mouse I want.
    Very cool. Thanks.

  • I would like to make an upgrade from creative suite cs5 to cs6 what is the price for student edition and what i have to do, i do not found in your website price

    i would like to make an upgrade from creative suite cs5 to cs6 what is the price for student edition and what i have to do, i do not found in your website price

    There are no upgrades for student editions. You simply buy a fresh license at the discounted price.
    Mylenium

  • Ideal export format for hdv source movie edited in motion

    Until recently, pretty much all completed projects I've done have been exported to NTSC-DV, but now I'm editing in HDV.
    My most recent project was done with 1920X1080 HDV source footage editing on a 1280X720 canvas in Motion.
    I like to export a web version and then a version of the project for posterity -- ie. the final best-quality (within reasonable final size) version of the movie that I can keep on hand for future uses as yet unknown.
    So, my question then is: what's a good final format to export to? Is there any reason to export to HDV just because I've started with HDV?
    Thanks.

    I use h.264 for a review copy. It will give you a much smaller file size. I think Pro Res is intended to be used as a lossless format to take footage between applications, correct me if I'm wrong. If all you need is a copy to show people, h.264 can give you excellent quality (it's used on Blu-ray discs).

  • I want to edit tunes from my violin lessons so I can play along without constantly having to stop the playing and re-set back to the beginning.  How do I do that?  Am I asking the correct group? Thanks for your help!

    My violin teacher records tunes for me to practice at home.  I download the recording onto iTunes.  I want to replay the same tune over and over again without having to stop every single time to manually re-set and re-start the same tune.  It would be better if I could edit out some of the verbal instructions if possible.
    I can't even figure out how to replay any single tune over and over again.  I apologize if I chose the wrong group.  If so maybe someone could steer me in the right direction.
    Thank you so much for your help.
    Barbie5

    If you have further queries along these lines the best place would be in the iTunes Forum.

  • Better for Video Editing? MBP 13" or 15" w/9600M GT

    I am planning on purchasing a Macbook Pro for relatively extensive use of Final Cut Pro (HD video) along with possibly some light Motion work and video transcoding. In addition I will be using it for photo editing and web editing. I don't plan on using it for any high-end gaming.
    I will be purchasing a $200 24" external monitor to use most of the time along with external keyboard and mouse (so MBP screen size isn't an issue), but I need the portability and don't have the funds to purchase an additional dedicated desktop yet.
    I am having trouble deciding between the 13" and the 15", mainly due to conflicting opinions I've been hearing over the importance of a dedicated graphics card for video editing. Salespeople at the Apple store tell me it's important and I should get the 15". Research online yielded heated forum arguments over whether it really makes a difference or not.
    The price difference is quite significant though at the configurations I picked ($765) so I am seeking advice here for whether people think the cost difference is really justified for my needs. Note that both configurations include 4GB of RAM, smallest hard drive option (i've got external drives) and AppleCare protection.
    Pricing with education discount after tax:
    13" 2.26GHz - $1520
    15" 2.66GHz w/9600M GT 256MB - $2285
    *Is there a real difference in video editing performance and if so, is it really worth an extra $765? Or is there a better option that I'm not considering?*

    Thanks everyone for the feedback!
    Studio X wrote:
    Are you planning on making any money at this or are you only in it for fun? Have you ever edited before? Have you ever edited with FCS before? What of the 44 billion HD formats are you planning on editing? Do you have a camera? What format does it record? If it's a flash media based device, what's your back up strategy? How are you planning to externally monitor the HD material ? What are you planning to use as media drives as the system drive should not be used for media capture or playback?
    Still, I guess I come down on the side of "it doesn't matter as neither one is a serious editing machine". If I was in the market for a laptop and was limited to the current apple lineup, the only machine of interest is the 17" MacBookPro. The other two MacBookPros you are considering have no expresscard slot and come only with glossy screens - both are serious deficiencies in my world.
    I do plan on using this computer professionally. I am a recent college graduate but do have professional FCS editing experience under my belt. However my work was done using both school and employer resources. I do have an archive of work in Mini DV(HDV) and AVCHD formats. I don't currently own an HD camera, however will likely be purchasing one in the near future. As far as externally monitoring HD material, what else would I need other than the 24" external monitor (perfectly capable of full HD) or a separate HDTV? In addition to several older usb2 external drives for backup I do have a 1TB 7200rpm external capable of FW800 and eSATA that I would use as a media drive.
    I currently have an old 17" dell notebook with a glossy screen. The screen hasn't really bothered me, but the size and weight of the notebook has. And while the 17" MBP is a little lighter and smaller than my old dell, I would still prefer a 13" or 15". But from the opinions I've been hearing I'm steering away from the 13" and fully realize the downsides to the lack of ExpressCard slot in the current 15" as well. Still wondering while Apple decided to remove it.
    MartinR wrote:
    If budget is a primary constraint, then consider a refurbished 15" or 17" MBP from Apple, or a used MBP from a reputable supplier.
    I hadn't checked into the refurbished options, but now that I did, I found a nice 15" (late 2008 unibody) configuration that would provide a lot more value for the buck. For about $550 more than the new 13" config I would get a faster processor, 2" bigger screen, 9600M 512mb GPU, double the internal storage, removable battery as well as the ExpressCard slot (even though its not listed in specs, it's there). The only trade off I can see is battery life.
    http://store.apple.com/us/product/FC026LL/A?mco=MjE0NjE5MA

  • AVCHD to HDV

    Premiere Elements can import AVCHD but not export. Right?
    Which means  that editing AVCHD means convert to HDV. AVCHD is mpg4 compressed with  resolution 1920*1080. HDV is mpg2 compressed with resolution 1440*1080, which at  playback is interpolated to 1920*1080.
    As far as I can see, this means  that editing AVCHD means loss of data. Because the film must be recoded to  another technical standard, which has lower resolution.
    And after  creating an HDV file, it may be relevant to turn that file into BLU-RAY, which  should mean one more change of technical standard. Right?
    How to minimize  loss of information?
    And yes, I understand that if I first create one HDV  file, and then cut away part of it, there will be a new recoding, which should  mean more loss of information.

    There would be virtually no loss of data in interpolating frame size. Certainly no more so than in going from AVCHD or HDV to BluRay disc.
    And, in Premiere Elements 9, the program edits AVCHD natively, if you select the right project preset for your camcorder. So there is no file conversion until you output your video.

  • Multiple Hard Drives for Video Editing with Premiere Elements 8?

    I'm using Premiere Elements 8 for video editing. These are the specs I'm using:
    The camcorder I used to shoot the footage is a Sony Handycam with  model number HDR-SR12. It's a digital HD video camera recorder that  shoots in NTSC 1920x1080i HD  recording. The footage was shot with AVC  HD  9M (HQ), which records in higher image quality mode. The  video  camera is connected to my computer through a USB cable.
    The  computer  itself is a Windows 7 desktop computer. The CPU is an HP  Pavilion Elite  HPE-150f PC with Intel Core i7-860 processor. I imported  the video into  Premiere by selecting "File" --> "Get Media From"  and then choosing the third  option from the top.
    My import  option is NTSC/AVCHD/Full HD 1080i 30 5.1 channel, which matches the  specs of the camera I shot the footage with.
    Even with the patch 8.0.1 that should be preventing crashing, the program keeps crashing upon startup with one specific video project. Using the exact same video files for that project, I recreated the video, with Elements, and never ran into the problem. Both times, I had the patch installed.
    At the moment, I am using only the single internal hard drive for everything (software, OS, video editing, etc.). It is 1 TB in size. However, I am informed that one hard drive is not recommended for video editing, and that I need at least two hard drives, one for OS and one specifically for video editing. I was also informed of FireWire 800 and eSata; however, it does not appear that my computer supports eSata.
    Can this problem be resolved if I have an external hard drive and connect it to my computer with FireWire 800 (which the computer supports)? If not, what can be done so this problem doesn't arise in the future?
    Thanks for the help.

    staring-into-space wrote: My import  option is NTSC/AVCHD/Full HD 1080i 30 5.1 channel, which matches the  specs of the camera I shot the footage with.
    When you import the footage is there a red line across the whole of the timeline?
    staring-into-space wrote:
     I recreated the video, with Elements, and never ran into the problem.
    As you have the recreated project working fine I'd be inclined to put this down as a one-off glitch. If it happens again on a different project then it may be more worrying. You may want to consider using save-as to create multiple versions of your project (note this does NOT duplicate the source clips - so you won't be eating up much extra disk space). You could for example use save-as to create a daily version - ProjectName-Mon, ProjectName-Tue etc....
    Cheers,
    Neale
    Insanity is hereditary, you get it from your children

  • Laptop for video editing

    Hello People
    I am seeking for medium price, new laptop  with firewire  , and efficient in compression of video material. I can spend  600$ for it .

    krakers wrote:
    Hello People
    I am seeking for medium price, new laptop  with firewire  , and efficient in compression of video material. I can spend  600$ for it .
    Look for a laptop with the fastest CPU and largest amount of hard drive space you can find.  Also, if you're editing HD video, look for one that has a 1920x1080 display - but you won't likely find that at a $600 price point.  However since you mention Firewire I assume you're still editing standard definition MiniDV video, which fortunately isn't too CPU-intensive to work with.  (I guess some HDV cameras combine high-def and Firewire, but these are fairly rare - AVCHD is far more common.)
    Graphics chipset doesn't matter much for video editing.  These days, the only thing differentiating GPUs is 3D rendering performance.  For 2D work, every chipset out there is more than sufficient.
    *disclaimer* I am not now, nor have I ever been, an employee of Best Buy, Geek Squad, nor of any of their affiliate, parent, or subsidiary companies.

  • I've got AVCHD into iMovie '09 and edited it, now how do I see it on the TV

    OK, so I got the AVCHD off my new Canon Vixia HFS100 (no problem there) and have successfully edited the video, adding titles, etc. Now what? Can't export it back to the camcorder and view it. Tried loading this ENORMOUS file (70Gb for 11 minutes) to my iBook and playing it via cables to the TV but it was very choppy and not very good quality. Tried burning it to DVD but the downcoding was so steep that the quality was awful. I've heard that apple TV might permit streaming of high def video. I've heard that I can burn AVCHD directly to DVD as a AVCHD file which is viewable on certain bluray players. Any other ideas? I know I can hook the camcorder directly up to the really sweet Sony highdef TV, but what about the stupid scenes that you want to edit out before you view the images. Hard to believe that there isn't a means to take, edit, and view HD video by now.

    No unfortunately it won't open in quicktime either.  It does the same thing that Imovie does, separates it into two file folders audio and video, and if i select video it opens to reveal 8 files that cannot be selected.  VIDEO_TS.BUP, VIDEO_TS.IFO, VIDEO_TS.VOB,VTS_01_0.BUP, VTS_01_0.IFO, VTS_01_1.VOB, VTS_01_2.VB, VTS_01_3.VOB.  All of which cannot be opened or selected.
    Opening it in Idvd and folllowing your suggestion works and I get a format code of NTSC.  Is that the same?  Thank you for your time and response.
    CaCanuck

Maybe you are looking for