'Average Weighted with Calendar Days' in Exception Aggregation

Dear specialists,
I have created a query with a lot of calculated keyfigures.
One of my calculated keyfigures shows percentage values.
When I select a calendar day, my report shows correct results
for the percentage values.
But when I execute the report without selecting a calendar day,
I get strange results like 3,21 % instead of 97,49 %.
There is a new functionality with version 7.0, where we can set
Aggregation properties like 'Average Weighted with Calendar Days' .
But when I select this with Ref. characteristic 'calendar day',
my report does not show any value or any result.
Are there any other properties to set in Aggregation or Calculations.
Please give me more information about this issue
regards Osman Akuzun

Hi,
       When you define an Exception aggregation on number of work days. There might be some reference characteristic defined in your Bex.
For exmaple, take a scenario like below. Your BW data is like below
0Employee           StockIssued
XXX                            50
XXX                            10
YYY                           20
YYY                            30
YYY                            40
ZZZ                            50
ZZZ                            100
ZZZ                            30
Suppose the first row which has values like XXX and 50 is not a working day and remaining all are working days then the exception aggregation applied using AV2 on the characteristic 0Employee will be caluclated in your Report as below
For XXX, it will       10/1 = 10 (because only 1 working day for the employee XXX)
For YYY, it will       90/3 = 30 (because all 3 are working days for the employee YYY)
For ZZZ, it will       180/3 = 60 (because all 3 are working days for the employee ZZZ)
This is how the exception aggregation works. Try to see the similar kind of example in your system and try to relate in the same lines explained by me. You can understand.
Regards
Sunil

Similar Messages

Issues with Calendar Printing Assistant (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80010105 (RPC_E_SERVERFAULT))

Hello,<o:p></o:p>
We have
been using the Calendar Printing assistant for a while an in the last 2 weeks
we have been receiving the following error on some of our shared calendars.<o:p></o:p>
There was a
problem accessing events for folder "User Name". Original Microsoft
Office Outlook 2007 error message: The RPC server is unavailable. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80010105 (RPC_E_SERVERFAULT))<o:p></o:p>
Our current
configuration is:<o:p></o:p>
Server
Side:
Exchange 2010 on Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard SP1<o:p></o:p>
Desktop
Side:
Windows 7 Pro 64bit SP1
Office 2010 32bit <o:p></o:p>
I came
across a similar issue someone posted on http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/office/forum/office_2010-outlook/office-2010-32bit-windows-7-64-bit-calendar/14b8bd09-ea6a-4302-96b4-16d09c3c0391
and was redirect to this site due to it possibly being an exchange issue.
Any help would be appreciated.<o:p></o:p>
Thanks,
AC<o:p></o:p>

Hi,
Exchange server does not provide Calendar Printing assistant feature.
Is it an outlook add-ins?
Please check whether shared calendars can work properly in OWA. If there is no issue in OWA, the issue should not be related to Exchange server.
If the issue happens in OWA, please collect details of errors and post them here for more troubleshooting.
Thanks,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

Scenarios for some of the Exception Aggregation

hello Experts,
Please explain some scenarios for the following Exception Aggregation:
1. Counter (value not equal to zero)
2. Counter (all values)
3. Average (value not equal to zero)
4. Average (weighted with no. of days)
5. Average (weighted with the number of workdays; factory calendar)
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Lavanya.

Hi,
check this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/82/f2dc37f0f12313e10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
hope this helps you
Best regards,
Ramesh.

What is the default exception aggregation for the NCKF IO STOCK

Hi all of you,
What is the default exception aggregation for the Non Cumulative Key Figure info object Stock?
When I am selecting Maximum, or minimum or Avereage (all values) its not selecting any of these values but only Average (weighted with the number of days) is getting selected.
Please explain.
Thank you.
TR.

Hi Vinod,
Thank you for your reply.
I had selected Last value as exception aggregation and activated it. But again when I double click on the IO STock, in the aggregation tab besides exception aggregation I find the option Average (Weighted with the number of days).
Is it getting selected by default when I check the radio button Ncum. value with in- and out-flow?
Please explain.
Thank you.
TR.

Exception Aggregation / Aggregation

Hi experts,
Can anyone please explain with an example what Exception Aggregation in Reports mean. I see a drop down in the properties of the query designer which shows summation, exception aggregation etc.
Best Help = Best Points:)
Thanks,
Kumar.

Hi,
It's a 'normal' KF (with summation, min or max as aggregation behavior), but you set some exception in this behavior... for example, you can say that a KF, normally aggregated by 'summation', have to show the max value (or the average, or '0' or something else), that is the 'exception aggregation' when you use it in combination with 0DOC_DATE (or other char), that is the 'exception aggregation char reference'.. .in this case OLAP processor give to you the possibility to see your KF with different behavior depending from you use 0DOC_DATE (in our example, MAX) or something else.
Example
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/d2/e0173f5ff48443e10000000a114084/content.htm
The topic has been discussed many times in SDN. Kindly search the forums before you post.
Find the below SAP help doc for ur reference...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/b2/e50138fede083de10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/43/21b4cd14cd06f4e10000000a422035/frameset.htm
Find the below search in Forums...
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/advancedsearch?cat=sdn_forums&query=exception+aggregation&adv=false&sortby=cm_rnd_rankvalue
-Vikram

Exception aggregation

Hello all,
I have a problem with my query, i don't want to aggregate on a characteristic, i've tested many options by creating a formula with my characteritic and tried with several possibilities on exception aggregation but none is working.
If someone can help me.
Thank you by advance.

hello, here my report result:
Division     Material     Qty mouvement        mouvement value     Coût matière standard lot
1000        HB9754      2                               250 EUR                     200EUR
and i would like to obtain :
Division     Material     Qty mouvement        mouvement value     Coût matière standard lot
1000        HB9754      1                              150 EUR                     100EUR
1000        HB9754      1                              100 EUR                     100EUR
If you have more questions don't hesitate.
thanks by advance.

Non Cumulative KF VS Normal KF with exception aggregation

What is the purpose that is served by "non-cumulative key figures" and is not served by "normal key figures with exception aggregation"?
Inflow and Outflow can also be mapped into a single key figure at update rules level.
Why un-necessary complications like two additional KFs and marker update etc?
Why can't we store actual inventory value on daily basis in a NORMAL key figure with exception aggregation on time?
Also, I heard that data amount will be huge if you don't use non-cumulative key figure. I am not able to understand why?
I HAVE ALREADY GONE THROUGH ALL THE HELP DOCUMENTATION AND ALL THE PREVIOUS THREADS. I DID NOT GET ANSWER TO THESE QUESTIONS.
THANKS IN ADVANCE,
Anup

Anup,
Q1: Why can we not store the actual inventory against the person -
In this case you will end up storing day wise information of stock for the person / material - this will lead to increase of your data volumes depending on the scenario.
Example :
Day Level stock only
Record Structure :
Material | End of day snapshot Stock| date
pipe | 100|20.2.2008
pipe|100|21.02.2008
pipe|100|22.02.2008
pipe|80|23.02.2008
Here you can notice that the material pipe has been sold on 23.03.3008 and no sale has happened previously - however since your extractor will give you end of day stock for all materials you will get 2 additional records
In an opening and closing stock scenario
Opening stock
Marker|
pipe|100|20.02.2008
opening stock|closing stock
pipe|100|100
pipe|100|100
pipe|100|80
Here the values will get overwritten and compared with the marker and calculate that the stock is 80 or 100 depending on the date. I am not able to give a proper example but hope I have addressed it in part.
Also it is a Non *** KF because if you look at stock for pipe over 3 days you will get 300 in the first scenario - this is wrong
and for the next scenario with opening and closing stock
it will ideally be
100 ( your marker) -100100-100100-100+80 = 80
this calculation is done at runtime and gives the right output.
In the other case you can check stock only on a date basis and with the assumption that the stock data is current for that day.
Hope it addresses youor question.
Arun
Day 1:

Exception aggregation for averaging

Hello,
I am having some issues understanding how to model key figures with exception aggregation.
For example: Lets say that I need to filter by age of employee per cost-center and calculate the average age of all employees belonging to each cost-center.
What is the appropriate way to model this in a report. Exception aggregation or variable? Is there any justification on which way to model this?
Any thoughts?
Regards to all

Ideally model the same in the query because if you model the same at the Key figure level - you cannot change the same without deleting data. Also if you model the same at the query level you can change the aggregation behavior depending on requirements.

Exception aggregation 'Average of all values'

Hi,
What is Exception aggregation 'Average of all values' wrt a reference characteristic. an how do I use it in Bex?
-Simmi

hi,
it determines how the key figure is aggregated in the BEx in relation to the exception characteristic, in your case it's averaged for all values.
another case sample maybe you need to report stock, which should not accumulated, but the last value, then you can choose 'last value', with reference chacarteristic to certain time characteristic.
you may also use it for 'calculated key figure' in BEx to get average value.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/82/f2dc37f0f12313e10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/6f/56853c08c7aa11e10000000a11405a/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/9d/76563cc368b60fe10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/d2/e0173f5ff48443e10000000a114084/content.htm

Exception aggregation with two characteristics

hi:
I need get the average value of a KF, based on the unique combinations of two characteristics.
material and color are two characteristics.
The base data is
m1 c1 $
m1 c2 $
m1 c3 $
m2 c4 $
m2 c1 $
Now there is 5 unique combination of mtl and color. but when I average the $ it is averaging it with dividing the $ sum by 4 as there is only 4 unique colors (with except.aggr. for color char). How can I make it to consider all the unique combinations of mtl and color and get the average even with duplicate colors?
thanks.

What is going to be record count for unique combination?
If its going to be 1 then you can create a pre query which will give only unique combination (record count =1 using condition), further sum of those record counts will give you the total unique combinations.
Further it can be used for averaging purpose w/o using exception aggregation.
Hope it helps.
Abhijeet

Exception Aggregation (Average) displaying incorrect values after EHP1 Upgr

Hi All,
Exception Aggregation (Average) displaying incorrect values after EHP1 Upgrade in our BW system
We have recently upgraded the system to EHP1. After the upgrade some of the queries where we are using Exception Aggregation (Average) started giving the incorrect values.
Eg. We are displaying three Key Figures KF1, KF2 and KF3 (=KF1 %A KF2) against Store Hierarchy. In KF3 we are using Exception Aggregation (Average) on a characteristic 0PLANT.
There are 14 rows against 0PLANT and out of those 2 rows are blank for KF1, so for KF3. When it is calculating the average of these key figures its dividing the total value by 12 instead of 14 which is not correct in our case. Earlier it was dividing the total by 14.
So in this case 'Average' and "Average of all values <>0" are behaving the same way.
Kindly provide some inputs on this.
Best Regards,
Sachin Verma
+44 7506740018

Hi,
Thanks for viewing the thread. And happy to let you know that the issue was resolved.
The solution was:
Two formulas (local) were created, one including the formula variable with replacement path for ZD1, with exception aggregation on ZD1, and the other with formula variable with replacement path for ZD2, with exception aggregation on ZD2. Both these formulas are hidden.
Another formula (local) was created for u2018time takenu2019 = formula with ZD1 u2013 formula with ZD2, with exception aggregation total on u2018ZDOCNOu2019.
For the second instance, when one requires exception aggregation on records that has multiple values for keys, a nesting of formulas can be done displaying only the ones required.
For e.g. a formula with exception aggregation on say characteristic u2018item no.u2019 can be hidden, and included in another formula for exception aggregation on characteristic u2018document no.u2019. This is a typical case where one can achieve calculation before aggregation for a calculated key figure, formula or a counter.
Hope it might help someone, and saves time and effort for a similar issue posted.
Also would like to keep this thread open for exploring better solutions.
Regards,
Vijay

FBL5 FIAR - exception aggregation - count customers with open items at key

Hello gurus,
I have read the information about counting all values in reference to a characteristic. I manage to count how many customers have a FIAR open item 'billing status' = Open in my FIAR cube.
Now I am asked to replicate transaction FBL5 of R3. This transaction will give you open items at a given key date by adding
the items with
A) Item status = 'O' and posting date <= key date
and the items with
B) Item status = 'C' and posting date < =key date and clearing date > key date.
I calculate the net value by creating 2 restricted key figures and then adding them in a CKF.
But for counting I have a problem. I can count how many customer make up the open items (case A)
and how many customers makeup items that where cleared between key date and today.(case B).
But I cannot sum the two numbers as there might be customers that are counted in both cases.
For example I have 4 customers that correspond to case A : 1000 1011, 1012 and 1014
And I have 3 customers that correspond to case B 1000 , 1011 and 1013
I would like to get 5 as the number of customers that verify either case A or case B (or both).
Is there a way to do this with the exception 'aggregation 'and 'count all values' property of CKF ?
Claudio

Hi,
The logic given in the above post may be a bit confusing to you. Check out this explanation and try to understand what I mean.
Posting Date - PD
Key Date - KD
Clearing Date - CD
PD--KD--
CD
-O(Status)-C--O-----C
-5107-----8
Let me explain the above table.
Between PD & KD there are 5 count with status'O' and 10 counts with status 'C'.
Between KD & CD there are c counts with status 'O' & 8 counts with status 'C'.
This means 5 with status 'C' becomes 7 between KD & CD.
Similarly, 10 status with 'O' becomes 8.
The logic I am trying to say is..
If you don't want to get counts with status 'C'(repeated) as I understood) 7-5 = 2. Show this 2 as count for status 'C' between KD & CD.
So the table will become like this now.
PD--KD--
CD
-O(Status)-C--O-----C
-5102(7)---2(8).
In braces shown are the total with status 'O'/'C' for the dates.
I hope this will solve your problem.
Message was edited by: AVR - IGA

Calendar Day format (Xcelsius dash with LO prompts connected to SAP-BW)

Hi guys.
I built a dashboard using Xcelsius 2008 with a few LiveOffice prompts. Some are optional and these don't cause any issues, the only one causing problems is one of the two compulsory ones (the other is related to Calendar Month).
The BW query connected to the universe on which the WebI query have been built has two variable selections: the first on Calendar Month, the second on Calendar Day. I haven't been able to find a way to pass Calendar Day data to the query.
When I launch it from WebIntelligence, I select the value from a "calendar". This is the way it is displayed: "dd/mm/yyyy hh:mm:ss AM". When I select a value from this calendar and I launch the query, results are displayed in the proper way.
I added the query to an Excel file that I've subsequently imported into Xcelsius. As I said before every other prompt works perfectly, the only one not working is the Calendar Day prompt. I tried passing this date in several ways, but I receive the message "Invalid format (LO 26000)".
These ways include:
- dd/mm/yyyy [0CALDAY].[AAAAMMDD]
- dd.mm.yyyy
- dd/mm/yyyy
- yyyymmdd
- ddmmyyyy
Did anyone have ideas on how to pass these data in a proper way to the LO prompt from Xcelsius?
Thanks a lot.

Hi Kevin, we decided to scrap the "Calendar Day" use because we didn't find a solution to pass the data from Xcelsius to BW.
There's still an issue. This seemed to work before but now it's not working anymore. We also have a Calendar Month variable. When Live Office creates a prompt on the Excel document, the variable is displayed like this (for instance, NOV 2009 [0CALMONTH].[200911]).
To avoid problems with keys, I've also created a separate query containing a Month list of values and the string to be passed to BW is created putting together the informal name (NOV 2009) and the unique name ( [CALMONTH].[200911]). When I insert this time prompt in the Xcelsius document, I receive the LO26315 message. If I remove it (I've got other six prompts, none of them related to a date), everything works fine.
Anyone ever had to pass a similar value from Xcelsius to BW?

Problem with exception aggregation

Hi forums,
Can any one help in this issue?
We checked the data in the ECOM cube for the order 63349312 where it is giving 6 records eventhough we are deleting the adjacent duplicates of the order number in the start routine. (Is it like the deletion of adjacent duplicates happen in data packet level instead of happening in the entire cube level? B'cos the same order might present in the different packets.)
    Hence the data is aggregating for the key figure, 'Number of Days' in the ECOM report. But if we check the keyfigure properties in the RSA1, there we selected the Exception Aggregation as 'First Value' and aggregation reference char as 'ZN_CORD' (Order number). Still it is aggregating the number of days value in the report.
Regards,
Charan.

Hi Rohit,
         We are doing same procedure as you mentioned. We assigned order number as refer characteristic to keyfigure No. of days in infi object level. But this operation is not working in report level
      Order number     ZCUDATE                  ZN_GSTRP            ZN_CORDKF     ZN_DAYSKF
        63349312     18.01.2009     01.10.2008     1,000     109
        63349312     18.01.2009     01.10.2008     1,000     109
        63349312     18.01.2009     01.10.2008     1,000     109
        63349312     18.01.2009     01.10.2008     1,000     109
        63349312     18.01.2009     01.10.2008     1,000     109
        63349312     18.01.2009     01.10.2008     1,000     109
I want o/p as
Order number     ZCUDATE                   ZN_GSTRP               ZN_CORDKF     ZN_DAYSKF
        63349312     18.01.2009     01.10.2008     1,000     109
but it is showing as
Order number     ZCUDATE                      ZN_GSTRP     ZN_CORDKF ZN_DAYSKF
        63349312     18.01.2009     01.10.2008     1,000            676

Exception Aggregation (Average of all values 0) - Non cumulative KF

Hi Experts,
I am using the Exception Aggregation (Average of all values <> 0) on a Non Cumulative KF. Most of the times i am not getting the desired results but some times it gives me the desired result.
my doubt is whether we can use Exception Aggregation on Non cumulatives?????
Thanks for any help
boobal

Hi,
Non-cumulative valuesare those key figures that are measured in relation to a period in time; that is to say they cannot be meaningfully cumulated over time. Non-cumulative values are summarized over time using so-called exception aggregation.
Example:stock quantities/-values, number of employees, account balances, etc.
Please check this document:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/d61b1e95-0501-0010-dfbe-a03970712ef1
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Mona
Edited by: Mona Kapur on Jan 17, 2008 10:45 AM

'Average Weighted with Calendar Days' in Exception Aggregation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for