AVK does not check includes

Hi, AVK does not check include jsp files <jsp:include
any clues?

Hi
This is a known issue with the AVK which we will be addressing in a future release

Similar Messages

PO creation-ME21n-Why SAP does not check company code and Plant relation

Hi All,
Does someone know, why SAP does not check Plant and company code relation at the time of PO creation or how can we put validation between plant and company code at the time of PO creation.
<b>Example:</b> Suppose i have a company 0001 which is assinged to Plant 0001. when i am creating a PO with another company code 0002(Entering at header level-Org, data) and using Plant 0001 at line item level. SAP does not do this validation.
How can we put this check in place?
Thanks in advance.
Deepak

Hello Deepak,
There are three types of purchasing
- Company code specific :You need to assign company code to Pur organization
- Plant specific : You must assign plant to pur organization
- Cross company purchasing: No assignment between company code and pur organization.
In the case 3, the system will not check company code and plant relationship, but it will check plant and pur organization specific.
The following is the copy of sap help text:
You can assign a purchasing organization to one company code. This is company-specific purchasing.
You can assign a purchasing organization to no company code. This purchasing organization can then procure for all plants assigned to it, irrespective of the company code to which the plant belongs.
Since each plant must be assigned to a company code, the company code can be determined via the plant in each procurement transaction, even if the procuring purchasing organization is not assigned to a company code.
A purchasing organization must be assigned to one or more plants. This is plant-specific purchasing.
Now, check your company-code and purchase organization assignment.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Vl01n for so does not check batch management

batch management on the mm was not initially checked.
was checked after the material was put on the so.
unrestricted batch stock does exist
attempt to vl01n for that line creates a delivery but does not check batch management under material tab
what needs done to get the delivery to inherit the batch management check?

Dear Starz,
I guess according to SAP standard - The indicator cannot be changed if stocks exist in either the current period or in the previous period.
However the same would be applicable as soon as you post the new stock after changing the material master record.
Hope this helps...
Give points if useful...
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

Record does not "check in" after workflow is complete

Hi All,
I have built a very simple workflow as below
1. start step
2. process step
3. approve step
4. stop step
in the fourth step that is the stop step i have selected "check in" so that the record automatically check's in after the process is complete,
but the record does not check in and the data manager shows it as in workflow. please help
Thanks in Advance
Sharma.

Hello Abhishek,
Thanks for the reply.
The issue is resolved.
The user had the authorizations and the records were checked out as well.
i was missing the step of "Mark as approved" that was the reason for the records not to check in automatically.
Thanky you again.
Regards,
Sharma

GetSubwebsForCurrentUser does not check Root site

Hi,
I am trying to check if logged-in user has permissions to site. I have used the "getSubwebsForCurrentUser", but it does not check the Parent site and only checks for subsites. What am I missing?
My current code is as below:
function sharePointReady() {
clientContext = new SP.ClientContext.get_current();
web = clientContext.get_site().get_web();
_currentUser = clientContext.get_web().get_currentUser();
webCollection = web.getSubwebsForCurrentUser(null);
clientContext.load(webCollection);
clientContext.executeQueryAsync(Function.createDelegate(this, this.onWebsLoaded), Function.createDelegate(this, this.onQueryFailed));
function onWebsLoaded(sender, args) {
var webEnumerator = webCollection.getEnumerator();
while (webEnumerator.moveNext()) {
var web = webEnumerator.get_current();
olist = web.get_lists().getByTitle("Pages");
clientContext.load(olist);
clientContext.executeQueryAsync(onRequestListSucceeded, onRequestListFailed);
I have also tried the "web" variable as
web = clientContext.get_site().get_rootWeb();
How to fix this?
Thanks

Hi,
The SP.Web.getSubwebsForCurrentUser Method returns the collection of child sites of the current site.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/jj246242(v=office.15).aspx
If you want to check permission for current application scope, we can use
SP.Web.getUserEffectivePermissions Method to achieve it.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/jj850885(v=office.15).aspx
http://blog.fidelityfactory.com/2011/11/29/sharepoint-client-ecma-script-check-user-permissions/
More information:
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/40082/js-jquery-check-if-on-root-web-of-root-sitecollection
Thanks,
Dennis Guo
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Dennis Guo
TechNet Community Support

AVK does not find common libraries

In our current JBoss application we have commons-logging.jar in a lib directory common to all WebApps. Now we run AVK 1.4.2 prior to a migration. How to tell AVK about this common lib? Once it helped to copy it into C:\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\lib\ext, but now not even that helps. AVK just complains:
For [ demo#demo_EJB.jar#OrderStoreEJB ]
classes [ org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory org.apache.commons.logging.Log ]
referenced by [ com.***.ejb.impl.OrderStoreBean] are not found
Please either bundle the above mentioned classes in the application
or use optional packaging support for them. In the log the extension directory was reported in coincidence with the one we used:
[exec] INFO: Extension Dir Path is
C:\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\lib\ext;C:\sun\javke1.4.2\appserver\domains\domain1\lib\extHow can we tell AVK about the common library?
Gerd

By copying commons-logging.jar in to ext lib, you have only made it available to AVK runtime. AVK does not make all extensions available to an application. An application must explicitly state a dependency on a library using Extension-List manifest entry. See the section "Mechanism 3: Installed Packages" in this article:
http://java.sun.com/j2ee/verified/packaging.html
Thanks,
Sahoo

I am on a MAC Application. It has been rejected by following reason. This app does not check for the existence of a purchase receipt, which can prevent In-App Purchases from being correctly processed. We recommend implementing receipt validation to reso

I am on a MAC Application.
It has been rejected by following reason.
This app does not check for the existence of a purchase receipt, which can prevent In-App Purchases from being correctly processed.
We recommend implementing receipt validation to resolve this issue.
At a minimum, the app will need to check for the existence of an App Store receipt and exit at launch with a status of 173 if it does not exist.
Any help ?
Thanks in Advance.

I am on a MAC Application.
It has been rejected by following reason.
This app does not check for the existence of a purchase receipt, which can prevent In-App Purchases from being correctly processed.
We recommend implementing receipt validation to resolve this issue.
At a minimum, the app will need to check for the existence of an App Store receipt and exit at launch with a status of 173 if it does not exist.
Any help ?
Thanks in Advance.

262 Movement Type Issue - Does not check order

Hello,
A material is issued via a 261 to an order.
Say this order is now complete and we want to do a 262 back into stock SAP does not check whether or not the material had ever been issued to the order I entered in my 261.
Is there anyway we can have a 262 movement type check whether the material is in the order we enter?
N.B. I am aware we can use MBST, however this doesn't help for partial reversals.
E.G.
MIGO - 261
Material     123456789
Order2       123XYZ
Plant          1234
MIGO- 262
Material    123456789
Order2      RANDOMORDER
Plant        1234
The above scenario will post okay. We don't want it to as Order 2 has never had anything to do with material 123456789.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
James

Shakti,
You did not read my problem.
As I have said using MIGO to reverse the 261 does not check if the material was issued to that order. If I wanted to I can 262 back to an order that I've just found randomly....
My question was how can we get SAP to check whether the order we used has issued that material before (in the 261).

My contact list does not always include a video icon so I can use FaceTime with wifi- how can i fix this

my contact list does not always include a video icon so I can FaceTime with a contact- how can I fix this?

Thanks so much for your reply but that won't help in my current situation. Maybe I didn't make it clear. The latest version of Quicktime as new as it sounds doesn't support screen recording on a powermac G5 Motorola chip with OS 10.5.8 which is the highest os I can go with that machine. If I can sync the two computers so I can get the application to record from my newer computer then I'm ok. I just don't have the recording application for audio that I'm using to demo for the website on the laptop as it's about 10,000 dollars. So, I have to use the older computer to do the audio presentation and try to get the newer computer synced to it so I can use the new version that works on snow leopard to record a screen shot that will hopefully appear on my laptop instead of the old machine. Hope that makes sense. It's a bit confusing but in a nutshell it's like this:
1. I am a Pro Tools Instructor which is the state of the art application and recording device for audio and movie scoring and I have a new job where I make small snippets of tips using Pro Tools which I'd like to record with quicktime on screen as they happen
2. the best version of Quicktime Pro available for the Power Mac, OS 10.5.8 will not do screen recording on it.
3. I can use the Quicktime application from my newer laptop but I need to sync it to the old machine
4. I'm hoping but I don't know, if I do this, that I can record Pro Tools in action from my new machine buy seeing it on this laptop screen and then recording it with the new quicktime.
5. If I can sync the two computers, I'm hoping this can happen but I can't use my ethernet connection as I have it used to connect to my recording console and can't afford to buy anything new like an ethernet hub yo connect the two so I'm hoping that there's another way to connect them.
I hope that makes sense and that possible you or someone else can help. Thanks so much! Scott

ERS does not check duplicate invoice check

Hi there,
We have all the vendors in the vendor master set up with duplicate invoice check on. However this does not work during MRRL process.
Any sugegstions, information is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Gajanan

Hello Gajanan,
If you create an invoice with transaction MRRL (ERS) then this invoice
will be created automatically in the background (not online).
Unfortunately I have to inform you that the function 'Duplicate
invoice check' is not implemented for ERS. This check was primarily
written for the online transactions, like MIRO.
A possible solution to this issue is contained in note
48121 which describes how you can create your own validation user exits
in the FI interface (function module ckmv_ac_document_create). In such
an user exit you can implement your own coding, for example the double
check for the invoices:
the following
CALL FUNCTION 'MRM_FI_DOCUMENT_CHECK'
    EXPORTING
      i_bukrs                = i_bukrs
      i_lifnr                = i_lifnr
      i_waers                = i_waers
      i_xblnr                = i_xblnr
      i_bldat                = i_bldat
      i_wrbtr                = i_rmwwr
      i_blart                = i_blart
    EXCEPTIONS
      invoice_already_exists = 1
      OTHERS                 = 2.
will be called in the validation user exit and if the sy-subrc = 1
(invoice already exists) then your own error message will be proceeded
and the invoice won't be posted.
Hope this helps
Ray

Plugin does not check for parent CAs?

Hi,
we have recently bought a Thawte certificate for siging applets. Our certificat is signed by Thawte Code Signing CA which is signed by Thawte Premium Server CA.
The Thawte Premium Server CA is in the plugin's keystore, but Thawte Code Signing CA is not.
When the applet is loaded we get a warning saying that our applet is signed by an unknown certificate? Why? What's going wrong? Shouldn't it see that Thawte Code Signing CA is signed by a trusted CA?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
aleix

I solved this issue by importing a PKCS#7 with the certificate chain. When importing each certificate on the chain separately (what I first did), keytool does not treat it as a chain and when signing an applet, only the signer's certificate is included.
regards,
aleix

Iphone running 2.1 does not check for new email in the background

hi
my iphone does not get new email unless i open the mail app.
it worked perfectly previous to now.
this has been the case for a few weeks. i have asked several friends, who tell me that they have the same issue after upgrading.
any solution? i use mail for work, and count on that ding in my pocket.
thanks
-m

A lot of people count on that ding. See this thread:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1708956&tstart=0
Still no solution and nothing from Apple about it.
Message was edited by: 8R3N7

SDBINST does not check error status of external programs (sdbconfig)

Hello,
I was trying to install maxdb 7.6.03.07 on SLES10 JeOS with SDBINST. The problem is, that after a sucessfull instalaltion (i.e. no error message) some of the programs like x_server was missing. First I suspected a missing archive or something from the Share, but then I found the reason for the problem in the logfile of the installer:
sdbinst was trying to execute sdbconfig, which failed. Obviously sdbinst is not checking the return code of this execution.
ACTION: make directory "/usr/spool/sql/ini" mode "777"
SYS: /opt/sdb/programs/bin/sdbconfig IndepData=/var/opt/sdb/data:
/opt/sdb/programs/bin/sdbconfig: error while loading shared libraries:
libstdc++.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
MSG: writing 1 packages
MSG: net install registry size = 948 bytes
MSG: wrote install registry (1573 bytes)
MSG: install registry successfully unlocked
Can I somehow add this to PTS?
BTW: there are various reasons why this program call could fail. Not only missing instalaltion dependencies (which I am going to fix and retry). So I think even when you check the library dependencies before, you still must monitor the exit status of those execs.
Gruss
Bernd

> I was trying to install maxdb 7.6.03.07 on SLES10 JeOS with SDBINST.
SLES 10 and JeOS are two different systems.
JeOS is an Ubuntu clone - which is not (officially) supported and thus you get those errors.
Markus

Learning portal does not check Prerequisite qualifications while booking

Hi,
We recently upgraded to EP4 and saw an issue on the learning portal.
When there are pre-requisite qulaifications attached to a course type, learning portal should check if the Learner has the prerequisite qulaification in his/her qualification profile and indicate if booking could be done or not.
We notice that learning portal is bypassing the check and shows the message ' The results of the prerequisites check indicate that you can book this course.' and does the booking successfully.
Please help.
Jaya

Hi Jaya
Function module LSO_TRAININGTYPE_GET_DETAIL_C
This function module is responsible for performing the prerequisite checks and determining whether the booking is possible or not by setting the flag NO_BOOKING_POSSIBLE. You can find that after executing the above function module for the learner that whether the value is space for flag NO_BOOKING_POSSIBLE.
This way you can findout the reason for the behaviour.
Best Regards
Chetan

Firefox Update Requires Admin Privs, But Does Not Check and Just Displays Misleading Message

Firefox attempts to perform an update from an Non-Admin account, the Update File is downloaded, the update is begun but the following misleading message is displayed...
"unable to install firefox update make sure no firefox applications are open and then try again"
...and the message is displayed each time Firefox is activated.
'''Explanation'''
In order to perform the update, the protected file; ''C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe'' must be opened with exclusive access. This fails because Non-Admin account may not modify files in the ''C:\Program Files\'' folder. (Did Not Fail because it is open by another process)
Performing the Update from the Admin Account executes properly. After Activating in Non-Admin Account, misleading message still displays, Firefox opens and includes "Updated" page showing 14.0.1 have been installed. Deleting the files from: ''C:\Documents and Settings\user_name\Local Settings\Application Data\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates\0'' eliminates problem.
'''These issues need to be addressed by Firefox Development:'''
# Before attempting Update, check for Admin Privs. If not, then just notify Update is available.
# Modify Error Message to reflect true meaning for failure (system can be modified that updates are only possible by specific Admin account rather than Admin Group).
# When applying Update, delete other Update Pending files in other user's Directory Trees.
Will a Firefox Developer Please Respond?

Thanks for the link. I have submitted a Bug Report on Bugzilla. Will post back when there is a response there.
And this is more than "plausible", it is "confirmed" (if you watch MythBusters). There are update log files that clearing show what is happening and why.
The most disturbing thing about this "bug", is that it clearly shows that nearly everyone is performing there "normal" activities (browsing, email, etc.) from an account with Admin privs. This means that when ('''not "if"''') the latest version of an infection gets past your AV shield (they can only block the ones already reported), it has access to every sensitive part of your system. I could give a long explanation of infections with a lot boring details, but just believe this:
'''Never perform "Normal" net activities from an account with Administrator privs.'''

AVK does not check includes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for