B1i Benchmarks -

Hello,
Does someone know what the B1i benchmarks (Tools - Benchmarks) are checking/benchmarking?
And how to improve these benchmarks?
There is no documentation available about this menuitem.
We have a open supportticket at SAP, about activating scenario's is very slow. And SAP-Support refer to the benchmarks but they  have no explanation what they are checking...
Thanks.
Best Regards Teun

OK了，是我没有在 Business process 那里做定义
另外有个疑问：
在 Business process - Mater Data 
BizPackage 那里选择 Z.Item 的时候，
Sender System(s) 是下拉框只能选一个系统，这个没问题
但是 Receiver System(s) 也是下拉框只能选择一个系统来接收同步数据？那如果要从一个系统将 Master Data 同步到多个系统，就必须新建多个这样的Scenario吗？

Similar Messages

  • Best Practice of DMS in Auto-Industry & benchmarks

    Hi Experts,
    what is the best practice in DMS for auto-induastry?
    Also we need centralized server and cache servers at plant level. what will be the best practice? and archiving solutions?
    what is benchmark for defining content and cache server size?
    Regards,
    Ravindra

    answered outside sdn

  • Configuration in SAP Business One integration 8.8 for SAP NetWeaver (B1iS)

    hi,
    i had schedule the background job (Scheduling Jobs using Tcode, RBDMIDOC) for Master Data Distribution Customer
    (DEBMAS).The schedule job show succeed.Then, i go to B1 configuration for B1iSN and define a Business Partner Bizpackage
    instance.After that , i go to activate it which under Business Processes --> Process --> Master Data.
    How can i know the process was start running because when i go check the Message Log under Monitoring, it;s show nothing ?
    Thanks

    Hi Elsen,
    If you are trying to run B1I and B1iS, they are incompatable on the same machione. That said, I am not clear what type of scenario you are attempting? If the incoming data is in the form of a SBO Object, you can confirm that the action happened on the sending system, also do the same for the reverse on the receiver system.
    If the sender system completed the task, then you have setup the inbound criteria or SLD incorrectly therefore not triggering B1i.
    I hope this helps you,
    Mike

  • Problem with my MSI 290x gaming 4g performance in unigine valley benchmark.

    First im dutch(netherlands) so sorry for my maybe bad english.
    My system is:
    Asus p8z77 v deluxe mb
    intel 3770k cpu
    16gb ram 1866 Corsair
    2x ssd 256 gb OCZ
    MSI 290x gaming
    win7 64bit ultimate.
    When i came home with my card i removed my old 7970 and replaced it with my new card.
    Put some programs up like gpu-z cpu-z realtemp ext.
    Then run Unigine-valley Benchmark with OC tool MSI at 1040 option.
    My cpu at 4.2ghz OC
    Score Unigine valley v1.0: 61.1 fps-score2558-min fps 30.3/max fps 112.8
    Custom settings at 1920-1080 and ultra 8x aa windowed.
    Seems ok result.
    Now to problem i have.
    So next i did (dumb me hehe) i try OC my CPU with All-suit II from ASUS to OC cpu extreme mode which stress test untill stable clock is found.
    Got a crash bluescreen and then after few attemps stable 4.3.
    Then did new benchmark and my score was alot lower and nomatter what i try my 290x did not pass 60fps any more and score dropped to 2100?
    3dmark firestrike gave first time score of 9655 and after my disaster with cpu failed attemp 9200.
    My card is stuck at 60fps max it won't get any higher?
    The GPU-Z also show PCI-E 3.0 X16@ X1 1.1and when i activate render i see it only change to x16 1.1 i never see gen 3.0.
    CPU-Z info motherboard also only pci-express link with x1 and x16
    My questions is how can o solve this problem it seems my motherbaord don't reconize my videocard anymore?
    Also posible that something with the OC attemp CPU broke something?
    I also try change from AUTO to GEN3 in bios but then i get a blackscreen when i boot up it stays backscreen, have to change it switch videocards so i can see my boot again and go into BIOS.
    Im at a lost here, hope one of you know a solution or whats my problem?
    Hope ive supply enough info im bit of a newbie at this sorry for that.
    Thanks in advance.

    >>Clear CMOS<< of your board and retry.

  • GT70 2PC: 870M does not activate, benchmarks and performance ingame confirm this

    I bought myself a GT70 2PC Dominator (the SSD version) with an 870M inside, and after starting several games, checking benchmarks and comparing framerates to my current desktop machine (which has an i5 2500K and a GTX 770), I find that, even after configuring the machine to prefer the "powerful Nvidia processor", and setting all games to use the Nvidia processor, it still uses the 4600 processor. I'm getting rather low framerates, I'm not hearing any fan speed increase, Benchmarks ingame like the one from Sleeping Dogs still report the 4600 GPU and some games won't even boot up properly (like Just Cause 2). I did configure all the games to use the Nvidia GPU in my Nvidia Control panel, I updated my drivers, Device manager is finding both cards.
    Is there a way to tell my laptop "Look, I don't care about saving my battery, I don't care about noise, I don't care about heat (as long as it does not damage anything), just ALWAYS use the Nvidia GPU, even when it's not needed, so I can actually have some enjoyment out of the 1600 EUR I spent on this machine"?

    Check your power button light and see if it lights red(red=dgpu, white=igpu) and make sure you've attached battery with AC plugged while playing games.
    Fan speed is changing by different cpu/gpu temperature, so check the temperature and the fan speed in Dragon Gaming Center and compare the temperature and the fan speed under different situation.
    Can you tell the graphics driver version you're using? (both Intel and NVIDIA one)
    Sadly for the Optimus structure, you can't disable the single graphics but you should be able to use the dGPU to run the game. Except the settings in NVIDIA Control Panel, you can also try to right click on the shortcut of the game and choose "run with graphics processor"> "High-performance NVIDIA processor"

  • Poor performance by Matlab and Windows benchmark tests

    Hello
    I have a Lenovo Thinkpad W520 with Windows 7 64bit installed. Compared to other Notebooks with comparable hardware, my Lenovo is very slow. To prove my thought, I carried through a Matlab (64bit) benchmark test and the Windows 7 benchmark test. In both tests, my Lenovo was worse than the other notebooks. During the tests I set the Power Manager to performance and activated the Lenovo turbo boost.
    Now I want to ask, if there are any settings, perhaps in the bios, to speed the laptop up? Or why result such a bad performance although the hardware is very good?
    Thanks for your help
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Thank you very much for your reply!
    I dated up the BIOS from version 1.27 to 1.32. Now the benchmark tests all look great!!
    Thanks

  • VMWare Fusion and Parallels Desktop Benchmark Comparison

    This is a quickie benchmark of VMWare Fusion and Parallels Desktop using Super PI, PC Mark 05, and Passmark.
    VMWare Fusion 36932
    Parallels Desktop 3094 Beta 2
    Notes:
    Both virtual machines were allocated with large 10+ GB virtual disks and 640MB of RAM. The VMWare CPU was configured with two processors. The Parallels CPU was configured with 1 (two is not available). VMWare reported the CPU as 1 physical, 2 logical processors running at 2.66 GHz while Parallels reported 1 physical, 1 logical processor running at 9.6 GHz (the combined speed of all four cores on the Mac Pro). The max observed CPU utilization in activity monitor when running under VMWare was 200% and max under Parallels was 173%.
    I chose not to compare 1 VMWare CPU vs. 1 Parallels CPU. While Parallels does not support SMP or multithreaded processes on multiple processors the CPU utilization on the Mac went well above 1 core (173%). For this comparison, I wanted to see results of max processing based on what the two vendors have delivered, as opposed to benchmarking the underlying "virtual or hypervisor cpu" on a 1:1 basis. This explains why VMWare was 2x faster than Parallels on some CPU tests.
    Both of these products are beta. VMWare is running in debug mode (can not be turned off in this beta).
    Caveat emptor on these stats. This was an unscientific exercise to satisfy my curiosity. Some of the extraordinary differences are highlighted with <--.
    Platform:
    Mac Pro 2.66 GHz, 2GB RAM, Nvidia 7300GT
    Disk 1 - OS X, 73GB Raptor
    Disk 2 - dedicated disk where each virtual machine image was created separate from the OS or any OS-related virtual memory files.
    VMWare and Parallels guest OS: Windows XP Professional, SP 2
    Comparison Benchmrk
    VMWare Fusion 36932 and Parallels Desktop 3094 Beta 2
    Super PI Parallels VMWare
    512K 8s 9s
    1M 20s 21s
    4M 1m 57s 2m 03s
    PC Mark 05 Parallels VMWare
    CPU Test Suite N/A N/A
    Memory Test Suite N/A N/A
    Graphics Test Suite N/A N/A
    HDD Test Suite N/A N/A
    HDD - XP Startup 5.0 MB/s 19.54 MB/s <--
    Physics and 3D Test failed Test failed
    Transparent Windows Test failed 69.99 Windows/s
    3D - Pixel Shader Test failed Test failed
    Web Page Rendering 3.58 Pages/s 2.34 Pages/s
    File Decrypt 71.73 MB/s 67.05 MB/s
    Graphics Memory - 64 Lines 179.92 FPS 111.73 FPS
    HDD - General Usage 4.82 MB/s 42.01 MB/s <--
    Multithread Test 1 / Audio Comp N/A N/A
    Multithread Test 1 / Video Encoding Test failed Test failed
    Multithread Test 2 / Text Edit 152.85 Pages/s 138.48 Pages/s
    Multithread Test 2 / Image DeComp 5.91 MPixels/s 35.4 MPixels/s <--
    Multithread Test 3 / File Comp 3.22 MB/s 6.03 MB/s
    Multithread Test 3 / File Encrypt 19.0 MB/s 33.26 MB/s <--
    Multithread Test 3 / HDD - Virus Scan 27.91 MB/s 25.49 MB/s
    Multithread Test 3 / Mem Lat - Rnd 16MB 5.34 MAcc/s 6.63 MAcc/s
    File Comp N/A N/A
    File DeComp N/A N/A
    File Encrypt N/A N/A
    File Decrypt N/A N/A
    Image DeComp N/A N/A
    Audio Comp N/A N/A
    Multithread Test 1 / File Comp N/A N/A
    Multithread Test 1 / File Encrypt N/A N/A
    Multithread Test 2 / File DeComp N/A N/A
    Multithread Test 2 / File Decrypt N/A N/A
    Multithread Test 2 / Audio DeComp N/A N/A
    Multithread Test 2 / Image DeComp N/A N/A
    Memory Read - 16 MB N/A N/A
    Memory Read - 8 MB N/A N/A
    Memory Read - 192 kB N/A N/A
    Memory Read - 4 kB N/A N/A
    Memory Write - 16 MB N/A N/A
    Memory Write - 8 MB N/A N/A
    Memory Write - 192 kB N/A N/A
    Memory Write - 4 kB N/A N/A
    Memory Copy - 16 MB N/A N/A
    Memory Copy - 8 MB N/A N/A
    Memory Copy - 192 kB N/A N/A
    Memory Copy - 4 kB N/A N/A
    Memory Lat - Rnd 16 MB N/A N/A
    Memory Lat - Rnd 8 MB N/A N/A
    Memory Lat - Rnd 192 kB N/A N/A
    Memory Lat - Rnd 4 kB N/A N/A
    Transparent Windows N/A N/A
    Graphics Memory - 64 Lines N/A N/A
    Graphics Memory - 128 Lines N/A N/A
    WMV Video Playback N/A N/A
    3D - Fill Rate Multi Texturing N/A N/A
    3D - Polygon Throughput Multiple Lights N/A N/A
    3D - Pixel Shader N/A N/A
    3D - Vertex Shader N/A N/A
    HDD - XP Startup N/A N/A
    HDD - Application Loading N/A N/A
    HDD - General Usage N/A N/A
    HDD - Virus Scan N/A N/A
    HDD - File Write N/A N/A
    Processor Intel Core 2 9653 MHz Processor Unknown 2661 MHz
    Physical / Logical CPUs "1 Physical, 1 Logical" "1 Physical, 2 Logical"
    MultiCore 1 Processor Core Multicore 2 Processor Cores
    HyperThreading N/A N/A
    Graphics Card Generic VGA Generic VGA
    Graphics Driver Parallels Video Driver VMWare SVGA II
    Co-operative adapters No No
    DirectX Version 9.0c 9.0c
    System Memory 640 MB 640MB
    Motherboard Manufacturer N/A Intel Corporation
    Motherboard Model N/A 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
    Operating System Microsoft Windows XP Microsoft Windows XP
    Passmark Parallels VMWare
    CPU - Integer Math (MOPS) 112.35 230.31 <--
    CPU - Floating Point Math (MOPS) 280.46 588.33 <--
    CPU - Find Prime Numbers (OPS) 446.37 676.99 <--
    CPU - SSE/3DNow! (MMPS) 2118.56 4737.13 <--
    CPU - Comp (KB/s) 2994.16 5952.34 <--
    CPU - Encrypt (MB/s) 18.09 36.27 <--
    CPU - Image Rotation (IRPS) 598.21 1184.41 <--
    CPU - String Sorting (TPS) 2118.81 3672.59 <--
    Graphics 2D - Lines (TPS) 220.71 25.15 <--
    Graphics 2D - Rectangles (TPS) 189.74 61.8 <--
    Graphics 2D - Shapes (TPS) 39.54 13.71 <--
    Graphics 2D - Fonts and Text (OPS) 190.39 75.88 <--
    Graphics 2D - GUI (OPS) 439.77 63.72 <--
    Memory - Allocate Small Block (MB/s) 2533.83 2526.21
    Memory - Read Cached (MB/s) 1960.5 1906.27
    Memory - Read Uncached (MB/s) 1871.79 1826.08
    Memory - Write (MB/s) 1687.81 1545.43
    Memory - Large RAM (OPS) 60.99 46.37
    Disk - Sequential Read (MB/s) 102.11 76.45 <--
    Disk - Sequential Write (MB/s) 58.33 50.9
    Disk - Rnd Seek + RW (MB/s) 51.4 40.4
    CPU Mark 711.08 1432.72 <--
    2D Graphics Mark 743.31 176.5 <--
    Memory Mark 599.94 580.38
    Disk Mark 766.11 606.7
    PassMark Rating 557.27 637.35<br>

    Thanks for posting these numbers - it's an interesting comparison.
    I would expect the final VMWare fusion performance numbers to be quite a bit better than that of Parallels - they have almost a decade's worth of experience more than the Parallels folks in this arena, and a much larger development team to boot.
    Once VMWare Fusion is released to the public, I think that you'll see a clearer distinction between the two products. VMWare will continue to appeal to the professional customer, with a more robust feature set and corporate-friendly features (and a correspondingly higher price tag); Parallels will fall more into the consumer/VirtualPC-replacement market. It will be interesting to see how Parallels will be affected when (and if) VMWare player is ported to OS X.
    Interesting about the Parallels performance stats on a native partition - looks like almost enough reason to avoid the bootcamp partition approach altogether. Sharing a native windows installation with a VM in parallels is a pretty scary situation in any case, as the two environments have entirely different hardware configurations. Do-able, but there is some black magic involved (if you want to see an example of what I mean, try to move a windows installation from one machine to another w/different hardware sometime - it ain't pretty); I wouldn't try this in a production scheme unless I had REALLY good backups.

  • Performanc​e benchmark

    Hi,
    I would like to do some performance benchmarking using Xmath and SystemBuild.  Matlab has a tic/toc function, and for Simulink there's model callback.
    Is there a similar function in both Xmath and SystemBuild?
    Thanks

    pkad,
    Another thing you might want to take a look at is the Hyperbuild manual.  As part of its tutorial it describes a way to time the run-time of a simulation.
    Have a great weekend,
    NathanT

  • Visual Composer (B1i) error message

    Hi,
    Does anyone know what does this error message say (while opening a new project in the Visual Composer tool):
    "Access to Remote Visual Composer library denied. Automation server can't create object" ?
    Thanks,
    AS.

    Hello Nic,
    Thanks much for you response and guidance. However, I checked my IE configuration and found that all ActiveX's are enables and I still get an error message as mentioned in the previous postings.
    Any other idea? (I attach a piece of my TomCat console log please take a look and see if it can help with more info.)
    The LOG:
    torBase.java:540)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValv
    eContext.java:102)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.jav
    a:520)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.j
    ava:137)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValv
    eContext.java:104)
            at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.j
    ava:118)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValv
    eContext.java:102)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.jav
    a:520)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineVal
    ve.java:109)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValv
    eContext.java:104)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.jav
    a:520)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:929)
            at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:16
    0)
            at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java
    :799)
            at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.proce
    ssConnection(Http11Protocol.java:705)
            at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java
    :577)
            at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadP
    ool.java:683)
            at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
    Feb 21, 2006 10:57:30 AM com.sap.b1i.bizprocessor.BizProcException dump2Log
    SEVERE: com.sap.b1i.bizprocessor.BizProcException: BPE084 path is too long in th
    e given BizStore-URI, only may have dataset/group
    Source of emission: com.sap.b1i.bizprocessor.BizStoreURI.throwEx(BizStoreURI.jav
    a:374)
            at com.sap.b1i.bizprocessor.BizStoreURI.throwEx(BizStoreURI.java:374)
            at com.sap.b1i.bizprocessor.BizStoreURI.CTor(BizStoreURI.java:320)
            at com.sap.b1i.bizprocessor.BizStoreURI.<init>(BizStoreURI.java:253)
            at com.sap.b1i.xcl_http.RequestEvaluator.<init>(RequestEvaluator.java:20
    2)
            at com.sap.b1i.xcl_http.HTTPListener.doXxx(HTTPListener.java:163)
            at com.sap.b1i.xcl_http.HTTPListener.doGet(HTTPListener.java:106)
            at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:689)
            at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Appl
    icationFilterChain.java:237)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationF
    ilterChain.java:157)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperV
    alve.java:214)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValv
    eContext.java:104)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.jav
    a:520)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invokeInternal(Standard
    ContextValve.java:198)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextV
    alve.java:152)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValv
    eContext.java:104)
            at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(Authentica
    torBase.java:540)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValv
    eContext.java:102)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.jav
    a:520)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.j
    ava:137)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValv
    eContext.java:104)
            at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.j
    ava:118)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValv
    eContext.java:102)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.jav
    a:520)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineVal
    ve.java:109)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValv
    eContext.java:104)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.jav
    a:520)
            at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:929)
            at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:16
    0)
            at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java
    :799)
            at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.proce
    ssConnection(Http11Protocol.java:705)
            at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java
    :577)
            at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadP
    ool.java:683)
            at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
    Feb 21, 2006 10:57:39 AM com.sap.b1i.dblayer.DBLayer$DBConnection logP
    WARNING: DBL028 DBConn.#2 Instance of statement SEL_A4 previously had been remov
    ed due to memory shortage!
    Feb 21, 2006 10:57:39 AM com.sap.b1i.dblayer.DBLayer$DBConnection logP
    WARNING: DBL028 DBConn.#2 Instance of statement SEL_A5 previously had been remov
    ed due to memory shortage!

  • Nvidia 180.22: mrxvt transparency and reasonable benchmarks

    I just got a 9800GT a few days ago. Just now I upgraded from 173.X nVidia drivers to the newest 180 in the repositories. Two questions:
    1) The tabbar transparency in MRXVT has been messed up with the driver upgrade. When I was using 173, it was fine, but using 180 breaks it. Now the tabbar has an odd semi-transparent hue to it, although other mrxvt transparency is fine. IIRC when I tried 177.X I had the same problem. Here's my xorg.conf, do I need to enable anything new with the latest driver? The only transparent-ish thing that has broken is the mrxvt tabbar. I'm not even using real transparency, just pseudo.
    Section "ServerLayout"
    Identifier "X.org Configured"
    Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0
    InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer"
    # InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
    EndSection
    Section "Files"
    # RgbPath "/usr/share/X11/rgb"
    ModulePath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/misc"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/100dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/75dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/TTF"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/Type1"
    EndSection
    Section "Module"
    Load "GLcore"
    Load "dbe"
    Load "xtrap"
    Load "record"
    Load "extmod"
    Load "dri"
    Load "glx"
    Load "freetype"
    EndSection
    #Section "InputDevice"
    # Identifier "Keyboard0"
    #Driver "kbd"
    # Driver "evdev"
    #EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Mouse0"
    Driver "mouse"
    Option "Protocol" "auto"
    Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
    Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
    #DisplaySize 340 270 # mm
    Identifier "Monitor0"
    VendorName "SAM"
    ModelName "SyncMaster"
    ### Comment all HorizSync and VertRefresh values to use DDC:
    HorizSync 30.0 - 81.0
    VertRefresh 56.0 - 75.0
    Option "DPMS"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    ### Available Driver options are:-
    ### Values: <i>: integer, <f>: float, <bool>: "True"/"False",
    ### <string>: "String", <freq>: "<f> Hz/kHz/MHz"
    ### [arg]: arg optional
    #Option "SWcursor" # [<bool>]
    #Option "HWcursor" # [<bool>]
    #Option "NoAccel" # [<bool>]
    #Option "ShadowFB" # [<bool>]
    #Option "UseFBDev" # [<bool>]
    #Option "Rotate" # [<str>]
    #Option "VideoKey" # <i>
    #Option "FlatPanel" # [<bool>]
    #Option "FPDither" # [<bool>]
    #Option "CrtcNumber" # <i>
    #Option "FPScale" # [<bool>]
    #Option "FPTweak" # <i>
    #Option "DualHead" # [<bool>]
    Identifier "Card0"
    Driver "nvidia"
    VendorName "nVidia Corporation"
    BoardName "GeForce 9800GT"
    BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
    Identifier "Screen0"
    Device "Card0"
    Monitor "Monitor0"
    DefaultDepth 24
    Option "NoLogo" "True"
    Option "RenderAccel" "True"
    Option "AllowGLXWithComposite" "True"
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 1
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 4
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 8
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 15
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 16
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 24
    EndSubSection
    EndSection
    Section "ServerFlags"
    Option "AutoAddDevices" "False"
    EndSection
    2) I ran glxgears on the old and new drivers. The old ones yielded about 6800 - 6900 FPS on average. The new ones yield about 6900 - 7000 FPS on average. So, about a ~50FPS improvement, not much to write home about. I've looked through other threads and this seems to be about on par for the graphics card I have (but I hear that on other distros nVidia cards can get much better benchmarks). Just want to check, does that sound about right? I'm unexperienced with tweaking Xorg for graphics performance and I basically just have what nvidia-config spit out.
    Thanks.

    Pseudo transparency works by placing a copy of your background in the background of your window. (like behind the words in your terminal)
    True Transparency will do that, and add an image of your other windows that are behind the transparent window.
    If you enable composite, (have a graphics card that can handle it), install xcompmgr and transset-df, then add
    xcompmgr -C & # The & keeps it from waiting for the program to stop before doing anything else.
    to you autostart, it will enable transparency. I'm using openbox and it works beautifully.
    Here is my .Xdefaults (by the way if it doesn't exist, you can create it in your user folder, just don't miss the' . ' !
    URxvt*foreground: #A8A8A8
    URxvt*scrollBar_right: false
    URxvt*scrollBar: true
    URxvt*scrollstyle: plain
    URxvt*borderLess: false
    URxvt*inheritPixmap: true
    URxvt*geometry: 124x24
    URxvt*tint: white
    URxvt*font: xft:monofur:size=8
    #URxvt*font: xft:terminus-font:
    #URxvt*font: xft:anorexia
    URxvt*color0: #000000
    URxvt*color1: #A80000
    URxvt*color2: #00A800
    URxvt*color3: #A85400
    URxvt*color4: #0000A8
    URxvt*color5: #A800A8
    URxvt*color6: #00A8A8
    URxvt*color7: #A8A8A8
    URxvt*color8: #545054
    URxvt*color9: #F85450
    URxvt*color10: #50FC50
    URxvt*color11: #F2FC50
    URxvt*color12: #5054F8
    URxvt*color13: #F854F8
    URxvt*color14: #50FCF8
    URxvt*color15: #F8FCF8
    ## xterm config
    xterm*termName: xterm
    xterm*background: #000000
    xterm*foreground: #A8A8A8
    urxvt*depth: 32
    urxvt*background: rgba:0000/0000/0000/dddd #the transparent magic happens here!
    URxvt.perl-ext-common: default,matcher
    URxvt.urlLauncher: firefox
    URxvt.matcher.button: 2
    URxvt*matcher.pattern.1: \\b(mailto|http|https|ftp|file):[/]*[\\w-]\\.[\\w./?&@#-]*[\\w/-]
    URxvt*matcher.pattern.2: \\bwww\\.[\\w-]\\.[\\w./?&@#-]*[\\w/-
    I use urxvt, but if you just change the u to an m, it 'should' work.
    Last edited by LeoSolaris (2009-01-29 18:28:15)

  • Are there any performance benchmark tools for Flash?

    I am looking to benchmark Flash on various computers that I use.  I was surprised that the performance of Adobe Flash on my Intel i5 computer running Windows 7 Pro 64-bit OS and IE 10 was MUCH WORSE than running on a Windows 7 Pro 32-bit on an Intel i3 computer running the same browser. 
    I have tried running both 32-bit IE and 64-bit IE and get the same general bad performance on the 64-bit Windows OS. I would like to find a tool to benchmark these various computers so that I can establish baseline performance while I explore finding a fix Adobe Flash on a 64-bit OS.
    Can someone suggest some tools for Flash performance benchmarking? Thank you.

    The best advise we can really give you is that both companies offer free trials and you should download them both and see which works best for you.  I own Parallels Desktop v6, and VMWare Fusion v3.  For me, VMWare s better for some things, but Parallels is better for most.  Depending on what you do and how you use your applications your milage may vary.
    One other note to keep in mind.  Since Apple is looking to release a new OS version in the very near future, you might want to hold-off a bit on our vitualization choice just yet.  I would exect that both companies will be working on a new release for support/compatibilty of the new MacOS, so you might want to wait to see if there are any other changes that make you want to lean towards one or the other...

  • After Effects Multi-Core Benchmarks

    I have been doing some testing trying to figure out how fast after effects renders and how to
    help it render faster. So far i have been very dissapointed with the results. no matter how
    much money we spend buying the fastest systems we can i cant seem to get much of a speed
    increase. we have 8 computers with 8 cores each now. but i cant seem to get after effects to
    use the extra cores even when i have 20Gb ram and enable multi frames with 2GB per frame. i see
    it load all the extra copies in task manager but when i render each time 1 core has "some"
    usage and the other 7 are always around 10-15% usage.
    so i wanted to try a simple benchmark that everyone could try and post their results.
    so i made a ntsc dv composition default at 30 seconds and just render it. NOTHING, just blank
    frames of nothing. how fast can afx output data like this? i tried tests with multiple frames
    enabled and disabled and output to tiff files (no compression) or the microsoft DV 48khz
    preset, both with the default BEST setting.
    Now i understand that after effects and premiere have 2 completely different rendering methods
    but still it is worth pointing out that premiere will output 30 seconds of blank video or
    actual real dv video footage to a DV AVI file in about 3-4 seconds. so why is it the same
    machine takes 10 times longer to render from after effects?
    I know in premiere i can simple drop in a dv avi file and export to mpeg2 and i can watch all 8
    cores almost max out as it renders about 6X faster then realtime.
    How can i do something in after effects to see my 8 cores max out?
    Please give any tips or tricks to speed up after effects. We must use vista64 as we have a 30TB fibrechannel array.
    Dell Laptop M6300 - Core 2 Extreme x9000 @2.8ghz (2 cores)
    Adobe CS4 Windows XP 64 bit - 8GB ram
    Multiple OFF     Tiff=1:24
                           DV=1:24
    Multiple ON      Tiff=1:32
                           DV=1:30
    Dell Precision 690 - Dual Quad Core Xeon E5320 @1.86ghz (8 cores)
    Adobe CS4 - Windows Vista 64 bit - 4GB ram - Matrox Axio LE
    Multiple OFF     Tiff= :47
                           DV= :43
    Multiple ON      Tiff= :56
                           DV= :52
    Dell Precision T7400 - Dual Quad Core Xeon X5482 @3.2ghz (8 cores)
    Adobe CS3 - Windows XP 32 bit - 4GB ram - Matrox Axio LE
    Multiple OFF     Tiff= :30
                            DV= :30
    Multiple ON      Tiff= :31
                           DV= :30
    Dell Precision T7400 - Dual Quad Core Xeon X5482 @3.2ghz (8 cores)
    Adobe CS4 - Windows Vista 64 bit - 20GB ram - Matrox Axio LE
    Multiple OFF     Tiff= :30
                           DV= :31
    Multiple ON      Tiff= :35
                          DV= :35

    Well we can toss around reasons for AE not using a processors full potental on a comp, but all I know is that all of the truly multithreaded and multi-processor enable applications I use are much better at using resources to their fullest than AE, or for that mater, most of the programs in the MC.
    When I run those programs my system is pushed to the limit- which is why I bought a quad core system in the first place. Mental ray, Fusion, 3D Coat, Zbrush...the list is long of programs that have no problem using all my cores for 90%-100% of opperations.
    In the end it just adds up to the fact that Adobe owns a large corner of the market- and since there is no competition, sees no reason NOT to be 5-10 years behind the curve when it comes to resource managment in their software.
    Making maters worse is how a lot of the user base is oblivious to the technological changes in processors over the last five years. These people don't know that all but one of their cores sit idle most of the time, and they buy the corp. speak put out by Adobe about "...how complex every thing is- so you don't understand...". Sorry- I may not be a programer or a processor engineer for Intel or AMD, but I know when a program is using resources or not and I know quite a few of the things Adobe has said are "...just too complicated to do..." are really covers for lack luster R and D. Either your programers need to get up to speed, or Adobe needs to actually do the right thing and set more money aside for development. I'm betting it's the later.
    Softimage 7.x is fully multithreaded and 64bit (yes all the way through not just with mr). This is a complicated program- and the development team is probably 1/10th the size of that working on PS. So why after all of these years are we still waiting for even a half baked attempt at such things on the Adobe front?
    The way AE handles RAM compared to programs like Fusion and the like is pathetic.
    Don't get me wrong- I love the program for motion graphics and simple comp work, but again, the resource management with AE feels like I'm back in OS8.
    -Gideon

  • One SAP R/3 to Multiple Business One (B1I) Sites

    Hi,
    I would really appreciate your assistance.
    I would like to confirm the various settings when you have one SAP R/3 system connected to multiple (3) Business One systems with B1i.
    In SAP R/3 we have created the following:
    Logical System:
    B1I00 First Branch
    B1I01 Second Branch
    B1I02 Third Branch
    We have created three RFC destinations:
    B1I00 with program ID B1IRFC00 and port A000000011
    B1I01 with program ID B1IRFC01 and port A000000012
    B1I02 with program ID B1IRFC02 and port A000000013
    Each RFC destination is linked to the IP address etc of the respective B1 System.
    We have created three distribution models with the message types and the various logical systems and production database:
    B1I00TOPD2
    B1I01TOPD2
    B1I02TOPD2
    The partner profiles has been generated and adjusted as per the documentation.  All relevant output conditions have been maintained.
    In the B1I setting of each site, we have maintained the following:
    SAP R/3 settings such as Application server, user ID, gateway etc.
    Sender partner and sender port is:
    B1I00 port B1I00
    B1I01 port B1I01
    B1I02 port B1I02
    Program ID is:
    B1IRFC00
    B1IRFC01     
    B1IRFC02
    Although both branch 1 and 2 can connect to SAP R/3 and SAP R/3 can connect to branch 1, the working connection of branch 1 stopped working as soon as we added the other two.
    Can you please confirm our settings?  Does the registration of the program ID happen with a test connection from the branch B1I system?
    Regards
    Martin van Wyk

    Hi Eddy,
    Thanks for your detailed answer.
    You are correct, I am talking about the program ID in R/3.  The documentation for a first B1 system is very good.  We are trying to determine what changes are needed when you add a second B1 to an R/3 system.
    We established that when you use the same program ID in the RFC destination, we get a conflict.  
    I would like to confirm that for a second B1 site, we need to create a different Logical system, use a different program ID and obviously use different partner details (customer etc.).
    When the program ID is not registered the test connection from R/3 to B1I doesn't work.  I have been able to register the program by simply doing a Test Connection from B1I to R/3.
    Regards
    Martin van Wyk

  • B1i Truncating space characters in elements from RegEx flat file SLD

    Task:
    I'm importing from a fixed-width file that's specifically 94 characters wide consisting of multiple columns.  My only concern at this point is the number of lines and their width.  I have to pad the block out to a specific number of lines, and all existing lines in my source file already fill all 94 characters.  Multiple headers and footers exist in the same flat file, so defining the format explicitly based on column width in RegEx will add significant time to the project (though it's not necessarily impossible).
    This file ends lines with a single LF character (no CR), which apparently is too much for TXT and CSV formats to handle (the entire file comes in as one line).  So I turned to Regex, where I can split the document on arbitrary characters like LFs.
    I've recorded a message and the lines look something like this:
    "ABB CCCCCCCCC DDDDDDDDDEEEEEEFFFFGHHHIIJKKKKKK KKKK K KKKKK    KKKKKK KKKK K KKKKK    LLLLLLLL"
    and column L is occasionally blank (just spaces).  This is one of the row formats present in the file.  Most of the columns use spaces as fill characters and are left justified.
    Tag definition looks like this:
    <tagDefinition xmlns="urn:com.sap.b1i.bizprocessor:pltdefinition" regex="\n" schemaName="" tagName="line" matchSplit="S" stackSize="10000" DOTALL="true" MULTILINE="false">
    </tagDefinition>
    Problems:
    With a recorded test messsage, the lines build properly:
    <Payload Role="S" intype="rgx_ruledoc">
    <bfa:io xmlns:bfa="urn:com.sap.b1i.bizprocessor:bizatoms" pltype="rgx" schemaName="">
      <line xmlns="">ABB CCCCCCCCC DDDDDDDDDEEEEEEFFFFGHHHIIJKKKKKK KKKK K KKKKK    KKKKKK KKKK K KKKKK            </line>
    </bfa:io>
    </Payload>
    But by the time it reaches my first XSL Transformation atom, I receive the data in this form:
    <Payload Role="S" intype="rgx_ruledoc">
    <bfa:io xmlns:bfa="urn:com.sap.b1i.bizprocessor:bizatoms" pltype="rgx" schemaName="">
      <line xmlns="">ABB CCCCCCCCC DDDDDDDDDEEEEEEFFFFGHHHIIJKKKKKK KKKK K KKKKK KKKKKK KKKK K KKKKK </line>
    </bfa:io>
    </Payload>
    In other words, I'm missing 3 spaces from within the middle of K and 11 from the end of the example line.  Multiple lines are affected by this.  I've built the Regex import portion properly, judging by the test message.  But the data I build is not the data I'm given.  And the truncation seems to be happening somewhere outside my control.
    Questions:
    1. Is there a way to specify that all spaces are non-breaking in the input/output format descriptors?
    2. Is there a way I can specify that B1i doesn't modify the data before handing it to me?
    3. Is there an easier/more correct way to do this?
    Also possibly 4. Can you specify line endings in TXT/CSV imports?

    As far as I've found, there's no way to specify that B1i doesn't normalize spaces for you in an input Msg.  I ended up splitting the incoming message line to its individual columns using the Regex format descriptor.  That way, I was able to track the integrity of each component of the message.
    However, when writing out to the same file format using the TXT file type, B1i is inserting commas between the columns, despite:
    1. Being TXT format, which shouldn't use delimiters.
    2. Having the delimiter field empty.  It correctly ignores this field, even if it does insert a delimiter.
    3. Specifying no delimiter explicitly using <FileOut type="file_full">/<Control><deli>.
    It seems odd that the included means for writing raw text would mangle the output message so.
    Has anyone successfully written data to a TXT file with no delimiter?

  • Problem with database list in SLD-- B1i server

    Hi
    i can 't see all database in SLD -> B1i server
    have you any idea?

    Hi
    If you are talking about the company databases which are not visible in SLD then you can check the link:
    Company database not created in SLD
    Regards

Maybe you are looking for