Back Order Stored Proc

Hi Guys
i have created this backorder stored proc that blocks all orders that will take the item into negative, ie selling more than actually available, it works 99% well, issue is i dont know where and why the stored proc still allows certain unknown scenarios to go through. i think i might have to amend it slightly and add " where t0.onhand - t1.quantity < 0", this could block all orders that will make the onhand negative. and yes this is only sold from one warehouse. Thanks
if( @object_type = '17' and(@transaction_type = 'A' or @transaction_type = 'U'))
begin
set @backorder = (select top(1) T0.itemcode from rdr1 T0 inner join oitw T1 on T0.WhsCode = T1.WhsCode where
(T0.Quantity >= T1.OnHand) and T0.itemcode = T1.itemcode and T0.docentry = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del )
if(@backorder is not null)
begin
set @error = 1
set @error_message = N'Item '@backorder' exceeds available quantity'
end
end

Sorted, had to add in "iscommited" into calculation

Similar Messages

Arrays as IN/OUT parameters to stored procs

I need the ability to pass Java arrays as input parameters and receive arrays as output parameters from stored procedures. I searched this forum for "array stored procedure" and came up with 9 posts dating back to April 30, 1999. In every one of these posts, people have asked how this can be done, and as yet there has not been any real solution provided. One messy solution is to add another stored proc that takes the array items as scalars and builds a PL/SQL table to pass to the original stored proc.
I am getting the impression that using arrays for IN/OUT parameters to/from stored procedures is not possible with JDK 1.1. Can it be done with JDK 1.2?
Isn't there anyone from Oracle that can provide an answer or solution?

I've searched for a way of passing a rowtype to a stored
procedure or passing an array to a stored procedure.
The following example may have some pertinence. It was posted at
http://www.classicity.com/oracle/htdocs/forums/ClsyForumID124/6.h
tml#
I also think that it would be useful to know how best to pas a
ResultSet or equivalent to a Stored Procedure, if someone has
more information. The idea is to have symmetry between the way
data is retrieved from SP's (CURSORS) and supplied to SP's (???
ARRAY/CURSOR) ?
"[Example]Example of using JDBC with VARRAYS and REF CURSORs"
This example shows how to use JDBC with VARRAYS and REF
CURSORs.
It also shows use of the PreparedStatement and CallableStatement
methods.
The example does the follows:
1. selects from a table of VARRAYs
2. inserts into a table of VARRAYs
3. selects from a table of VARRAYs
4. calls stored procedure -- parameters <ref cursor, varray>
In order to test it, you will need to do two things first:
1) Create related tables and types first. The screipt is given
below.
2) Create a package that gets called from JAVA code. The script
is given below.
======================= Step 1 create tables etc. cute here
==================
-- Run this through SQL*PLUS
drop TABLE varray_table;
drop TYPE num_varray;
drop TABLE sec;
-- create the type
create TYPE num_varray as VARRAY(10) OF NUMBER(12, 2);
-- create the table
create TABLE varray_table (col1 num_varray);
-- create the sec table
create table sec (sec_id number(8) not null, sec_grp_id number
(8) not null,
company_id number(8) not null);
insert into sec values (1,200,11);
insert into sec values (2,1100,22);
insert into sec values (3,1300,33);
insert into sec values (4,1800,44);
==================== End of step
1===========================================
================== Step 2 create package
====================================
-- Run it through sql*plus
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE packageA AS
type sctype is ref cursor return SEC%ROWTYPE;
procedure get_port_consensus(sc IN OUT sctype, arr IN
num_varray);
procedure test_port_consensus(sc IN OUT sctype);
END packageA;
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY packageA AS
procedure test_port_consensus(sc IN OUT sctype)
IS
testArr num_varray := num_varray(200, 1100, 1300, 1800);
BEGIN
get_port_consensus(sc, testArr);
END test_port_consensus;
procedure get_port_consensus(sc IN OUT sctype, arr IN num_varray)
IS
BEGIN
open sc for select * from sec
where sec_grp_id = arr(1)
or sec_grp_id = arr(2)
or sec_grp_id = arr(3)
or sec_grp_id = arr(4);
END get_port_consensus;
END packageA;
===================== End of step 2
===================================
============ JAVA code to test the whole thing
========================
import java.sql.*;
import oracle.sql.*;
import oracle.jdbc.oracore.Util;
import oracle.jdbc.driver.*;
import java.math.BigDecimal;
public class ArrayExample
public static void main (String args<>)
DriverManager.registerDriver(new oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver
// Connect to the database
// You need to put your database name after the @ sign in
// the connection URL.
// The example retrieves an varray of type "NUM_VARRAY",
// materializes the object as an object of type ARRAY.
// A new ARRAY is then inserted into the database.
Connection conn =
DriverManager.getConnection ("jdbc:oracle:oci8:@v81",
"scott", "tiger");
// It's faster when auto commit is off
conn.setAutoCommit (false);
// Create a Statement
Statement stmt = conn.createStatement ();
System.out.println("Querying varray_table");
ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery("SELECT * FROM varray_table");
showResultSet (rs);
// now insert a new row
// create a new ARRAY object
int elements<> = { 200, 1100, 1300, 1800 };
ArrayDescriptor desc = ArrayDescriptor.createDescriptor
("NUM_VARRAY",conn);
ARRAY newArray = new ARRAY(desc, conn, elements);
// prepare statement to be inserted and bind the num_varray type
System.out.println("PreparedStatement: Inserting into
varray_table");
PreparedStatement ps =
conn.prepareStatement ("insert into varray_table values (?)");
((OraclePreparedStatement)ps).setARRAY (1, newArray);
ps.execute ();
// query to view our newly inserted row
System.out.println("Querying varray_table again");
rs = stmt.executeQuery("SELECT * FROM varray_table");
showResultSet (rs);
// prepare a callable statement -- call the stored procedure
// passing <ref cursor in out, varray in>
System.out.println("CallableStatement: Calling Stored
Procedure");
OracleCallableStatement oraStmt1 =
(OracleCallableStatement)conn.prepareCall("{ call
packageA.get_port_consensus(?, ?) }");
oraStmt1.registerOutParameter(1, OracleTypes.CURSOR);
oraStmt1.setARRAY(2, newArray);
oraStmt1.execute();
rs = (ResultSet)oraStmt1.getObject(1);
// loop through the result set of the ref cursor and display
while (rs.next()) {
System.out.println(rs.getString("sec_grp_id"));
// Close all the resources
rs.close();
ps.close();
stmt.close();
oraStmt1.close();
conn.close();
public static void showResultSet (ResultSet rs)
throws SQLException
int line = 0;
while (rs.next())
line++;
System.out.println("Row "+line+" : ");
ARRAY array = ((OracleResultSet)rs).getARRAY (1);
System.out.println ("Array is of type "+array.getSQLTypeName());
System.out.println ("Array element is of type
code "+array.getBaseType());
System.out.println ("Array is of length "+array.length());
// get Array elements
BigDecimal<> values = (BigDecimal<>) array.getArray();
for (int i=0; i<values.length; i++)
BigDecimal value = (BigDecimal) values;
System.out.println(">> index "+i+" = "+value.intValue());

Cross Docking with LE-WM - or - Reactivating Back Orders upon Goods Receipt

I have been reviewing the documentation for Opportunistic and Planned Cross Docking in LE-WM. The requirement is to release Back Orders upon receipt of a shipment to avoid putting them away and picking them right away from the bin. We want to release the Back Orders for picking in the GR area at the time of receipt.
So far it appears that Opportunistic Cross Docking depends on a Transfer Order already existing. The system then cancels the existing TO and replaces it with a TO to pick from the receipt Storage Type.
Planned Cross Docking appears to require an existing Outbound Delivery to the expected Inbound Delivery.
In the case of a Back Order, no Outbound Delivery or Transfer Order exist since there is no stock to release until the goods are received.
Is there a way to release Back Orders to be picked directly from Goods Receipt?
Thanks;
Jim

The problem is that all the information I found so far about it is over the process of external goods coming and sending they out without the need of storing in the warehouse. They go directly to the picking area (one step) or in two step process going first from 902 (Good receive from external) to Cross docking Sorage type.and another movement from Cross Docking Storage type to 916 Good issue Storage type.
I need to know if it is possible to implement a solution of Cross Docking for certain number of products having a factory and a warehouse. If so, would you give me a brief process flow?.
Thank You very much.
Al
Edited by: agmogena on Aug 22, 2011 12:01 PM

Stored Proc with SSRS multi value parameter gives " Must Declare scalar Varaiable @StateID

Hi All,
I have one stored proc with @fromDate , @Todate and multivalue input
parameter@StateID of type integer.
When I run below stored proc via SSRS by selecting multiple values thru multiValue parameter into @StateID...it gives error saying "Must Declare scalar variable @StateID"
Not sure what is wrong with the input parameters.
ID is Integer type in all the 3 tables - dbo.EastCities, dbo.WestCities , dbo.Country
I need help fixing this "Must Declare scalar variable @StateID" error
This is the UDF split() I am using..
Function:
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.SplitStateID
(    @List VARCHAR(MAX))
RETURNS TABLE
AS
RETURN
(        SELECT DISTINCT [Value] = CONVERT(INT, LTRIM(RTRIM(CONVERT( VARCHAR(12),SUBSTRING(@List, Number, CHARINDEX(',', @List + ',', Number) - Number))))
FROM dbo.Numbers
WHERE Number <= CONVERT(INT, LEN(@List))AND SUBSTRING(',' + @List, Number, 1) = ','    );
GO
SELECT [Value] FROM dbo.SplitStateID('10,30,50');
Also, I have created dbo.Numbers table which is used in udf..
reference url -- >
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2009/08/01/processing-a-list-of-integers-my-approach.aspx
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @UpperLimit INT;
SET @UpperLimit = 10000;
WITH n AS(
SELECT        rn = ROW_NUMBER() OVER        (ORDER BY s1.[object_id])
FROM sys.objects AS s1
CROSS JOIN sys.objects AS s2
CROSS JOIN sys.objects AS s3)
SELECT [Number] = rn - 1
INTO dbo.Numbers FROM n
WHERE rn <= @UpperLimit + 1;
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX n ON dbo.Numbers([Number]);
Stored procedure:
Create Procedure dbo.CountrySelection
( @FromDate Date, @ToDate Date, @StateID Int)
AS
BEGIN
set nocount on;
SELECT * INTO #EastCities
FROM (
SELECT ID,Description from dbo.EastCities
Where ID IN (SELECT Value from dbo.SplitStateID(@StateID))
) AS A
SELECT * INTO #WestCities
FROM (
SELECT ID,Description from dbo.WestCities
Where ID IN (SELECT Value from dbo.SplitStateID(@StateID))
) AS B
SELECT * INTO #Country
FROM (
SELECT ID , Description, State,Country From dbo.Country
) AS C
SELECT EC.ID AS East, WC.ID AS West , EC.Description AS EastDesc, WC.Description AS WestDesc, CT.State, CT.Country
FROM #Country CT
LEFT JOIN #EastCities EC ON CT.ID=EC.ID
LEFT JOIN #WestCities WC ON CT.ID=WC.ID
DROP TABLE #EastCities
DROP TABLE #WestCities
DROP TABLE #Country
END
Above 3 temp tables are joined by #Country.ID key
It works fine when single value is passed in @StateID
Exec dbo.CountrySelection '01/01/2010','02/01/2010',10
It fails when multi value passed into @StateID
Exec dbo.CountrySelection '01/01/2010','02/01/2010','10,30,40'
SSRS error log shows "Must declare scalar variable @StateID"
Need help in fixing this issue.
Thanks,
RH
sql

Visakh,
I changed @StateID date type to varchar(max) and still I get this error.
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Must declare the scalar variable "@StateID".
   at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection)
   at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj)
I am running this SO in SSRS quert Type =Text
Actually sp created on db2 database and due to some limitations I am running(via SSRS) this from different db1 database data source within the same db server. When I run this sp from SSRS query designer(edit query designer button) and pass
multivalue parameters to @StateID as 10 , 20 it works and gives expected resultset.
Thanks,
RH
sql

Best approach to return Large data ( 4K) from Stored Proc

We have a stored proc (Oracle 8i) that:
1) receives some parameters.
2)performs computations which create a large block of data
3) return this data to caller.
compatible with both ASP (using MSDAORA.Oracle), and ColdFusion (using Oracle ODBC driver). This procedure is critical in terms of performance.
I have written this procedure as having an OUT param which is a REF CURSOR to a record containing a LONG. In order to make this work, at the end of the procedure I have to store the working buffer (an internal LONG variable) into a temp table, and then open the cursor as a SELECT from the temp table.
I have tried to open the cursor as a SELECT of the working buffer (from dual) but I get the error "ORA-01460: unimplemented or unreasonable conversion requested"
I suspect this is taking too much time; any tips about the best approach here? is there a resource with REAL examples on returning large data?
If I switch to CLOB, will it speed the process, be compatible with callers, etc ? all references to CLOB I saw use trivial examples.
Thanks for any help,
Yoram Ayalon

We have a stored proc (Oracle 8i) that:
1) receives some parameters.
2)performs computations which create a large block of data
3) return this data to caller.
compatible with both ASP (using MSDAORA.Oracle), and ColdFusion (using Oracle ODBC driver). This procedure is critical in terms of performance.
I have written this procedure as having an OUT param which is a REF CURSOR to a record containing a LONG. In order to make this work, at the end of the procedure I have to store the working buffer (an internal LONG variable) into a temp table, and then open the cursor as a SELECT from the temp table.
I have tried to open the cursor as a SELECT of the working buffer (from dual) but I get the error "ORA-01460: unimplemented or unreasonable conversion requested"
I suspect this is taking too much time; any tips about the best approach here? is there a resource with REAL examples on returning large data?
If I switch to CLOB, will it speed the process, be compatible with callers, etc ? all references to CLOB I saw use trivial examples.
Thanks for any help,
Yoram Ayalon

How to pass a refcursor to a java stored proc

Hi all,
Please forgive me as I am new to Java and JDeveloper....
I want to pass a refcursor to a java stored proc. Does anyone know how to accomplish this?
Thanks,
dayneo

Hi,
As Avi has indicated, you can map ref cursor to java.sql.ResultSet
here are Call Specs and a code snippet from chapter 3 in my book.
procedure rcproc(rc OUT EmpCurTyp)
as language java
name 'refcur.refcurproc(java.sql.ResultSet[])';
function rcfunc return EmpCurTyp
as language java
name 'refcur.refcurfunc() returns java.sql.ResultSet';
* Function returning a REF CURSOR
public static ResultSet refcurfunc () throws SQLException
Connection conn = null;
conn = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:oracle:kprb:");
((OracleConnection)conn).setCreateStatementAsRefCursor(true);
Statement stmt = conn.createStatement();
((OracleStatement)stmt).setRowPrefetch(1);
ResultSet rset = stmt.executeQuery("select * from EMP order by empno");
// fetch one row
if (rset.next())
System.out.println("Ename = " + rset.getString(2));
return rset;
Kuassi

Problem Obtaining multiple results from MySql Stored Proc via JDBC

I've spent alot of time on this and I'd be really grateful for anyones help please!
I have written a java class to execute a MySQL stored procedure that does an UPDATE and then a SELECT. I want to handle the resultset from the SELECT AND get a count of the number of rows updated by the UPDATE. Even though several rows get updated by the stored proc, getUpdateCount() returns zero.
It's like following the UPDATE with a SELECT causes the updatecount info to be lost. I tried it in reverse: SELECT first and UPDATE last and it works properly. I can get the resultset and the updatecount.
My Stored Procedure:
delimiter $$ CREATE PROCEDURE multiRS( IN drugId int, IN drugPrice decimal(8,2) ) BEGIN UPDATE drugs SET DRUG_PRICE = drugPrice WHERE DRUG_ID > drugId; SELECT DRUG_ID, DRUG_NAME, DRUG_PRICE FROM Drugs where DRUG_ID > 7 ORDER BY DRUG_ID ASC; END $$
In my program (below) callablestatement.execute() returns TRUE even though the first thing I do in my stored proc is an UPDATE not a SELECT. Is this at odds with the JDBC 2 API? Shouldn't it return false since the first "result" returned is NOT a resultset but an updatecount? Does JDBC return any resultsets first by default, even if INSERTS, UPDATES happened in the stored proc before the SELECTs??
Excerpt of my Java Class:
// Create CallableStatement CallableStatement cs = con.prepareCall("CALL multiRS(?,?)"); // Register input parameters ........ // Execute the Stored Proc boolean getResultSetNow = cs.execute(); int updateCount = -1; System.out.println("getResultSetNow: " +getResultSetNow); while (true) { if (getResultSetNow) { ResultSet rs = cs.getResultSet(); while (rs.next()) { // fully process result set before calling getMoreResults() again! System.out.println(rs.getInt("DRUG_ID") +", "+rs.getString("DRUG_NAME") +", "+rs.getBigDecimal("DRUG_PRICE")); } rs.close(); } else { updateCount = cs.getUpdateCount(); if (updateCount != -1) { // it's a valid update count System.out.println("Reporting an update count of " +updateCount); } } if ((!getResultSetNow) && (updateCount == -1)) break; // done with loop, finished all the returns getResultSetNow = cs.getMoreResults(); }
The output of running the program at command line:
getResultSetNow: true 28, Apple, 127.00 35, Orange, 127.00 36, Bananna, 127.00 37, Berry, 127.00 Reporting an update count of 0
During my testing I have noticed:
1. According to the Java documentation execute() returns true if the first result is a ResultSet object; false if the first result is an update count or there is no result. In my java class callablestatement.execute() will return TRUE if in the stored proc the UPDATE is done first and then the SELECT last or vica versa.
2. My java class (above) is coded to loop through all results returned from the stored proc in succession. Running this class shows that any resultsets are returned first and then update counts last regardless of the order in which they appear in the stored proc. Maybe there is nothing unusual here, it may be that Java is designed to return any Resultsets first by default even if they didn't happen first in the stored procedure?
3. In my stored procedure, if the UPDATE happens last then callablestatement.getUpdateCount() will return the correct number of updated rows.
4. If the UPDATE is followed by a SELECT (see above) then callablestatement.getUpdateCount() will return ZERO even though rows were updated.
5. I tested it with the stored proc doing SELECT - UPDATE - SELECT and again getUpdateCount() returns ZERO.
6. I tested it with the stored proc doing SELECT - UPDATE - SELECT - UPDATE and this time getUpdateCount() returns the number rows updated by the last UPDATE and not the first.
My Setup:
Mac OS X 10.3.9
Java 1.4.2
mysql database 5.0.19
mysql-connector 5.1.10 (connector/J)
Maybe I have exposed a bug in JDBC?
Thanks for your help.

plica10 wrote:
Jschell thank you for your response.
I certainly don't mean to be rude but I often get taken that way. I like to state facts as I see them. I'd love to be proved wrong because then I would understand why my code doesn't work!
Doesn't matter to me if you are rude or not. Rudeness actually makes it more entertaining for me so that is a plus. Nothing I have seen suggests rudeness.
In response to your post:
When a MySql stored procedure has multiple sql statements such as SELECT and UPDATE these statements each produce what the Java API documentation refers to as 'results'. A Java class can cycle through these 'results' using callableStatement dot getMoreResults(), getResultSet() and getUpdateCount() to retrieve the resultset object produced by Select queries and updateCount produced by Inserts, Deletes and Updates.
As I read your question it seems to me that you have already proven that it does not in fact do that?
You don't have to read this but in case you think I'm mistaken, there is more detail in the following website under the heading 'Using the Method execute':
http://docsrv.sco.com/JDK_guide/jdbc/getstart/statement.doc.html#1000107
Sounds reasonable. But does not your example code prove that this is not what happens for the database and driver that you are using?
Myself I dont trust update counts at all since, in my experience some databases do not return them. And per other reports sometimes they don't return the correct value either.
So there are two possibilities - your code is wrong or the driver/database does not do it. For me I would also question whether in the future the driver/database would continue to behave the same if you did find some special way to write your SQL so it does do it. And of course you would also need to insure that every proc that needed this would be written in this special way. Hopefully not too many of those.
So this functionality is built into java but is not in common use amongst programmers. My java class did successfully execute a stored proc which Selected from and then finally Updated a table. My code displayed the contents of the Select query and told me how many rows were affected by the update.
It isn't "built into java". It isn't built into jdbc either. If it works at all then the driver and by proxy the database are responsible for it. I suspect that you would be hard pressed to find anything in the JDBC spec that requires what that particular link claims. I believe it is difficult to find anything that suggests that update counts in any form are required.
So you are left with hoping that a particular driver does do it.
I suppose it is rare that you would want to do things this way. Returning rowcounts in OUT parameters would be easier but I want my code to be modular enough to cover the situation where a statement may return more than one ResultSet object, more than one update count, or a combination of ResultSet objects and update counts. The sql may need to be generated dynamically, its statements may be unknown at compile time. For instance a user might have a form that allows them to build their own queries...
Any time I see statements like that it usually makes me a bit uncomfortable. If I am creating data layers I either use an existing framework or I generate the code. For the latter there is no generalization of the usage. Every single operation is laid out in its own code.
And I have in fact created generalized frameworks in the past before. I won't do it again. Benefits of the other idioms during maintenance are too obvious.

Should I do this with Java Code or Stored Procs ? (for best performance)

Hi All,
I need to decide where should I implement my business logic, in Java code or Stored procs.
Here is the requirement :
- One Order has 70 products (Order_Table )
- Can be duplicate products, so I have to do summarize / grouping by product
- For every product, I have to check, if it is entitled for a Bonus product, then I have to Insert one to Bonus_Table.
- This is done when/after the transaction is SAVED (COMMIT)
The question is, which one has better PERFORMANCE :
(1) Create a rowsetIterator on the Order details (70 products) and call a stored procedure to do the logic for every single product (so that the Insert to Bonus_Table done in stored proc). means the stored proc will be called 70 times.
OR
(2) After the transaction is COMMITted, call the stored procs ONCE to do the logic for all the products at once.
OR
(3) I do all the logic with Java Code within ADF
Given the requirement above, which approach is most efficient / best performance ?
Thank you very much,
xtanto

Problem with this is that you ask 100 people and you probably get 100 different answers. ;o)
Many would say that you push as much business logic into the database with your data; others might say you only put data in your database and your business logic is kept on the application server.
In reality your would probably have a mix of both and your decision would probably be influenced by your own background ...
Can't be more precise than that.
Grant

Calling an EJB deployed in OC4J from Java Stored Proc in Oracle

Hello!
Trying to make a call to an EJB deployed in OCJ4 from a oracle java stored proc. After loaded orion.jar and crimson.jar lib into SCOTT schema, I can't get the JNDI Context working because of this error:
============================================
javax.naming.NoInitialContextException: Cannot instantiate class:
com.evermind.server.ApplicationClientInitialContextFactory. Root exception is
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
com/evermind/server/ApplicationClientInitialContextFactory
at java.lang.Class.forName0(Class.java)
at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java)
at com.sun.naming.internal.VersionHelper12.loadClass(VersionHelper12.java:45)
at javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.getInitialContext(NamingManager.java)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.getDefaultInitCtx(InitialContext.java)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.init(InitialContext.java)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.<init>(InitialContext.java)
===============================
I did load the java with "loadjava" with on time with the "resolve" option and time time no option and still no working.
Here is the EJB client code:
=======================================
import java.sql.*;
import java.util.*;
import javax.naming.*;
import com.evermind.server.ApplicationClientInitialContextFactory;
class EmpRemoteCall {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(getEmpName());
public static String getEmpName() {
String ejbUrl = "java:comp/env/ejb/Emp";
String username = "admin";
String password = "admin";
Hashtable environment = new Hashtable();
environment.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, "com.evermind.server.ApplicationClientInitialContextFactory");
environment.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, "ormi://127.0.0.1/testemp");
environment.put(Context.SECURITY_PRINCIPAL, username);
environment.put(Context.SECURITY_CREDENTIALS, password);
//environment.put(Context.SECURITY_AUTHENTICATION, ServiceCtx.NON_SSL_LOGIN);
//environment.put(javax.naming.Context.URL_PKG_PREFIXES, "oracle.aurora.jndi");
com.kboum.sertir.essais.EmpHome homeInterface = null;
try {
Class.forName("com.evermind.server.ApplicationClientInitialContextFactory", true, ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader());
System.out.println("Creating an initial context");
Context ic = new InitialContext(environment);
System.out.println("Looking for the EJB published as 'java:comp/env/ejb/Emp'");
homeInterface = (com.kboum.sertir.essais.EmpHome) ic.lookup(ejbUrl);
catch (CommunicationException e) {
System.out.println("Unable to connect: " + ejbUrl);
e.printStackTrace();
//System.exit(1);
catch (NamingException e) {
System.out.println("Exception occurred!");
System.out.println("Cause: This may be an unknown URL, or some" +
" classes required by the EJB are missing from your classpath.");
System.out.println("Suggestion: Check the components of the URL," +
" and make sure your project includes a library containing the" +
" EJB .jar files generated by the deployment utility.");
e.printStackTrace();
//System.exit(1);
catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
System.out.println("Unable to connect: " + ejbUrl);
e.printStackTrace();
//System.exit(1);
try {
System.out.println("Creating a new EJB instance");
com.kboum.sertir.essais.Emp remoteInterface = homeInterface.findByPrimaryKey(Integer.valueOf("7369"));
System.out.println(remoteInterface.getENAME());
System.out.println(remoteInterface.getSAL());
remoteInterface.setSAL(2);
System.out.println(remoteInterface.getSAL());
return remoteInterface.getENAME();
catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println(e.getMessage());
e.printStackTrace();
return "error";
null

What I did to solve this problem was to
create a simple RMI remote object that
resides outside the database JVM and that
serves as a proxy EJB client for your java
stored procedure. The stored procedure can
invoke a method on the remote RMI object
which then looks up the EJBean's home
interface and invokes the relevant method on
the bean's remote interface, and relays any
return values back to the java stored
procedure.
Hope this helps,
Avi.
null

Here's how to pass XML as a parameter to an Oracle stored proc

This, or something like it, should be all over the web and I intend to do so.
The first sample has exactly what you need in order to pass "XML" as a parm to a stored proc.
http://www.oracle-base.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8468

> Really, what is the difference between the 2?
"What is a...?" questions are easily answered by Google. Generally speaking, however, "JavaScript" is Netscape's implementation of ECMAScript, a scripting language primarily for client-side development for a web browser. "Java" is an entire platform, but typically refers to an object-oriented programming language that is typically compiled to bytecode and run in a virtual machine.
They're not the same thing at all.
~

How can you set the max row for a 'open cursor' in a stored proc?

I would like to know how can you set the maximum amount of row returned in a resultset coming from a stored proc?
You can do it via JDBC with cStatement.setMaxRows(10); but it works only for select that you do via JDBC...
I would like the same functionality using open cursor inside a stored proc...
Thanks...

is "where ROWNUM <= 10" the equivalent of "cStatement.setMaxRows(10);" because the ROWNUM as problem with the ORDER BY clause and the setMaxRows() as no problem...

DATE value in a STORED PROC becoming incorrect?

I have a PL SQL script that creates a TABLE on the fly with a DATE column in it. I then have a FUNCTION that queries this table. The FCN is called from within a SP. In these three steps the date becomes a BOGUS value.... I am seeing things like this:
2/5/0009 12:00:00.000 AM
6/4/0009 12:00:00.000 AM
4/16/0009 12:00:00.000 AM
7/9/0008 12:00:00.000 AM
5/7/0007 12:00:00.000 AM
Obviously the 0009 should be 2009 and 0008 2008 etc..... ANy idea what is causing this?????
Here is my code:
DROP TABLE MAXIMO.MAX411_TEMP_REG_DATE
create table
   MAXIMO.MAX411_TEMP_REG_DATE
as
SELECT ITEMNUM,
        DESCRIPTION,
        LOCATION,
        BINNUM,
        REG_DATE + (trunc(rownum / ((select count(*) from inventory)/100))*7) REG_DATE
FROM ( SELECT   I.ITEMNUM,
                I.DESCRIPTION,
                N.LOCATION,
                N.BINNUM,
                TO_DATE(SYSDATE,'DD-MON-YYYY') REG_DATE
        FROM ITEM I, INVENTORY N
        WHERE I.ITEMNUM = N.ITEMNUM
        ORDER BY N.LOCATION, N.BINNUM)
COMMIT
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION MAXIMO.FCN_GET_REGDATE (item_in IN VARCHAR2)
RETURN DATE
IS
new_regdate   DATE;
var_problem_indicator   number;
BEGIN
          SELECT reg_date
           INTO new_regdate
           FROM MAXIMO.MAX411_TEMP_REG_DATE
           WHERE itemnum = TRIM(item_in) AND ROWNUM = 1;
END;
RETURN new_regdate;
END;
/ STORED PROC CALL
var_regdate             DATE;
var_regdate := MAXIMO.FCN_GET_REGDATE (rec.ITEMNUM);Thanks for any help I can get.....
Miller

Looking at this code I find two items very disturbing:
ORDER BY N.LOCATION, N.BINNUM
... and ...
WHERE itemnum = TRIM(item_in) AND ROWNUM = 1;
It looks a lot like you are trying to rely on a sort order imposed on the data as it is inserted into the table to identify a particular record for a given item_in. If so, that's very dangerous, but it's nothing that can't be fixed. Let us know ...

How to use NTILE in a stored proc.?

My module works in SQL*Plus but not in a stored proc. Have tried dynamic SQL to no avail.
Has anyone been successful (in 8.1.7)? If so, how did you overcome the problem?

Thanks, Rich.
Here is my similar effort:
create or replace procedure New_CSD_Hist(p_yr IN number,
                                        p_qtr IN number,
                                        p_market IN varchar2)
is
     TYPE CSD_cur_type is REF CURSOR;
     CSD_cur           CSD_cur_type;
     more_data           BOOLEAN:=TRUE;
begin
OPEN CDS_cur FOR
SELECT client,
          (ntile(3) over(order by sum(csd_spend) DESC)) as csd
from      csd_hist
where      csd = '0' and
          csd_spend > 0 and
          market = p_market and
          yr = p_yr and
          qtr = p_qtr
group by client;
HERE is another effort, trying to follow an example from Pipelines:
lv_stmnt :=
'declare '||
'lv_yr varchar2(4) := :1; '||
'lv_qtr varchar2(1) := :2; '||
'lv_market varchar2(16) := :3; '||
'begin '||
'insert into clientspend select client,'||
'ntile(3) over (order by sum(csd_spend) DESC) as csd '||
'from csd_hist where csd = ''0'' and csd_spend > 0 and '||
'market = :3 and yr = :1 and qtr = :2 '||
'group by client; end;';
execute immediate lv_stmnt using p_yr,p_qtr,p_market;
commit;
Again,
Thanks for your comments and suggestions.,
Dick Berry

BPC5.1 - Data manager package to Stored proc with custom return codes

Hi all,
Does anyone have experience passing the return codes from a stored procedure back into the eData "view status" package progress or event log details?
When my stored procedure throws errors, the offending SQL code shows up in the pacakge details, which is helpful. But what I'd really like is to structure my stored proc with return codes
0 = everything's wonderful
1 = invalid category / time combination
2 = unauthorized
3 = no data to process
And then handle these codes as either "completed" "warning" or "error" in the package progress.
And ideally, I'd like to put some meaningful message about the warnings & errors, directly into the log details, so the user can fix the problem themselves rather than ask the IT guy to trouble-shoot.
Any tips? I've started playing with using the on-complete, on-success, on-failure routing of different tasks within the DTSX package (SQL 2005), but I'm just working on a trial-and-error basis right now. (With # of errors = # of trials.)
Thanks,
Tim

In case anyone's interested, I've solved this by tracking my return codes as a package variable.
Within the package, I have conditional logic moving from task to task, evaluating the return code to check for various conditions, and selecting which tasks to perform accordingly.
In the last task, I run a final stored procedure which posts some data (completion time & status) to a custom transaction log table, and then if the return code is not zero, I script and execute some SQL which I know will throw a "fake" error. The SQL statement itself includes the key information I want the end user to see. For example
Select InvalidEntitySelection [USEast1],TransactionID [12340] from ThisTableDoesntExist
Select UnauthorizedUser [Tim], TransactionID [12345] from ThisTableDoesntExist
Select WorkStatusIsLocked [USEast1 Actual 2008], TransactionID [12345] from ThisTableDoesntExist
It's not exactly elegant, but it gets the message across, which is all that I need. In this way, the end user sees that the package failed with an error, and when they look at the package details, they can see the problem. They can pass on the transaction ID to an administrator to look into the details, if they can't figure it out on their own.
Sorin, I never managed to figure out how to use a VB task to send the information back to the user, plus force the package to end in an error. I'm sure there's a way to do so, but this seems to work for my requirement.
I'm not entirely happy with the "fake error" approach, but I don't know if BPC has any support for "intentional" programming of errors in the DTS scripting toolset.
Thanks,
Tim

Non blocking stored proc call

HI
I have written a c application using OCI which can call stored proc. but that is using blocking call. Is it possible to call stored proc in non blocking mode? So that I can receive output in call back function. Actually stored proc take much time to execute can I associate some Subscription callback-function with my stored proc call. Any idea?
Thanks
Kamran

If you want to do non-blocking calls in OCI, you just need to set the server handle (svrhp below) attribute:
sb2 polling=1;
OCIAttrSet((dvoid *)svrhp,
(ub4)OCI_HTYPE_SERVER,
(dvoid *)&polling,
(ub4)0,
(ub4)OCI_ATTR_NONBLOCKING_MODE,
(OCIError *) errhp);
And then you call you OCIExecute() as you would in blocking mode. The difference is that instead of blocking until the call is done on the server, it always returns immediately. So instead of calling it just once per statement and checking the return code, you must keep calling OCIExecute() until it does not equal OCI_STILL_EXECUTING. When the proc is done, the final call to OCIExecute() will then be OCI_SUCCESS, OCI_ERROR, whatever happened.

Back Order Stored Proc

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for