Backend Purchase Requisition - is it possible to change price?

Hi,
We are using classic scenario (SRM 4.0 - R/3 4.7), and, after the transfer of the PR to the backend system, the "Price" field in ME51N is non-changeable. Is it possible to change price for items in the backend purchase requisition after it was transferred from SRM system?
thanking you in advance,
Andrey.

Hi Andrey
One the Pr is generated in R3 backend system we can change the price field and this can be regulted by field status group where you have to keep the option optional for price field rarther than display .
This is in MM -spro - Manterial Management - Purchase requisiton- Define Screen Layout at Document Level
regards,
Nimish Sheth
Do reward points for helpful answers.

Similar Messages

Purchase requisition , ME51N, user exit for change Release date

Hello.
Purchase Requisition ( transaction ME51N).
I want to change the value of u201ERelease dateu201C using user-exit EXIT_SAPLMEREQ_005.
CALL METHOD im_req_item->get_data
RECEIVING
    re_data = get.
set = get.
set-frgdt = u2026..
CALL METHOD im_req_item->set_data
    EXPORTING
      im_data = set.
Next, in dynpro is visible the right value from EXIT_SAPLMEREQ_005, but when saving the system uses another value, not the value from user exit.
Do you anybody have some experiences with this problem?
Lumir

Hi
The USer Exit you can use for the ME51n Tcode is by using Badi's.The Badi you can use is ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST BADI.
Method to be used: PROCESS_ITEM
This link gives you a brief idea.Hope it helps you.
BADI for ME51N
Thanking you.

External Requirements - Why isn't possible to change Price in SOCO ?

Hi SRM Gurus,
I'm currently working with SRM_SERVER 500(SAPKIBKS09) release, in Sourcing Cockpit why is it not possible to change the gross price of a 'limit item' sent from backend to SRM system ? Such kind of requirements changes are possible in worklist area for other purchase requisitions.
Thx - Rafi.

This solved my problem.
http://derflounder.wordpress.com/2013/06/29/erasing-a-filevault-2-encrypted-volu me/

Purchase requisition document type change after Enhancement pack 4

HI,
we have recently upgraded to enhancement pack 4, after which i am not able to change purchase requisition document type.
In change mode ME52N, the system is allowing to make change but when i goback and display the same PR again the change is not visible in change history also.
I am able to make other changes. facing the problem with change in document type only.
Regards,
Raghu

Hi,
One thing please note that once you select the document type and draft the PR and save the PR, you will get the doc number.
Once you get the document number you cannot change the PR document type .
The reason is document type is linked with number range so it cannot be changed because different seriers of document number is assined to differentdocument type.
And moreover document type is linked with the screen settings also. So I would request you to check the settings for each doc. type

Purchase order referencing released purchase requisition change

Hello everybody
When we create a purchase order making reference to a released purchase requisition, I can still make changes on the item such as changes on the quantity, value, etc.
We would like to know how to restrict changes of purchase orders when they reference purchase requisitions already released.
Thank you in advance and regards,
Alejandra Álamo B.

Hi,
For meeting this requirement, you will have to create a new document type (If the same requirement exists for all the Purchase Orders, do not create additional document types).
Next create a new Field selection where the fields that are copied from PR are made non editable (display). Assign this field selection to the new document type.
Normally, PO fields are editable because the quantity and values may change based on the negotiation with vendor, or to club requirements.
Hope this helps
Priyadarshi

ME52N: Purchase Requisition Change GL Account Number

Requirement: ABAP auto-change the GL Account field number in a Purchase Requisition after the Material Group is changed.
Background: This custom logic has been successfully applied to all types of Purchase Requisitions using BADI ME_PROC_REQ_CUST, with the exception of a Purchase Requisition type that is called a 'Service Limits'. There are differences that are important to note between a 'Service Limits' Purchase Requisition and the other Purchase Requisitions that had custom code added without any problems.
1)This type of Purchase Requisition uses a item category of 'B', and the logic has a tendency to flow through SAP differently.
2)This type of Purchase Requisition's GL Account number is under-intensified on the 'item' subscreen, and cannot be changed manually on that screen like the others..
3)In order for the GL Account to be changed manually, or for the GL Account to be changed once my code has changed the GL Account Number, the user must select the 'Limits' tab and select the Account Assignment arrow, then a popup appears where the GL Account can be changed manually, or, my coded GL Account number change then occurs.
Problem: I want the custom code to be able to change the GL Account NUmber without having to go into thge 'Limits' tab, where the icon has to be selected. I believe the problem is that the field is protected, because it displays as under-intensified, thus, preventing my new GL Account NUmber from displaying. I also have the subsequent SAP code below that appears to reject set_exkn because protect is set to 'X'.
CODE1: Is my custom code.
CODE2: Is the SAP code that my will flow into where this field appears to be unchangeable.
My question:
I am thinking that this GL Account field is protected and cannot be changed because it is under-intensified on the subscreen on the Purchase Requisition. Can it be changed with custom code, a way to 'unprotect it'? Or, are there settings that should be changed in SPRO for the Purchase Requisition to allow this functionality to change the GL Account number.
   Thank-You
(CODE1)
METHOD IF_EX_ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST~PROCESS_HEADER.
*Purchase Requisition Item Declarations
DATA: LT_ITEMS        TYPE MMPUR_REQUISITION_ITEMS.
DATA: LS_ITEM         TYPE MEREQ_ITEM.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <FS_ITEM> TYPE LINE OF MMPUR_REQUISITION_ITEMS.
*Purchase Requisition Accounting Declarations.
DATA: LT_ACCT         TYPE MMPUR_ACCOUNTING_LIST.
DATA: LS_ACCT         TYPE EXKN.
DATA: LS_SETX          TYPE MEPOACCOUNTING_DATAX.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <FS_ACCT> TYPE LINE OF MMPUR_ACCOUNTING_LIST.
CALL METHOD IM_HEADER->GET_ITEMS
    RECEIVING
      RE_ITEMS = LT_ITEMS.
LOOP AT LT_ITEMS ASSIGNING <FS_ITEM>.
    LS_ITEM = <FS_ITEM>-ITEM->GET_DATA( ).
    LT_ACCT = <FS_ITEM>-ITEM->IF_ACCT_CONTAINER_MM~GET_ITEMS( ).
    LOOP AT LT_ACCT ASSIGNING <FS_ACCT>.
      LS_ACCT = <FS_ACCT>-MODEL->GET_EXKN( ).
      LS_ACCT-SAKTO = 'N500300   '.
      LS_SETX-SAKTO = 'X'.
      <FS_ACCT>-MODEL->SET_EXKN( LS_ACCT ).
      <FS_ACCT>-MODEL->SET_EXKNX( LS_SETX ).
    ENDLOOP.
ENDLOOP.
ENDMETHOD.
(CODE2)
METHOD if_accounting_model_mm~set_exkn.
DATA: ls_buffer     LIKE LINE OF my_data_input_buffer,
        ls_bufferx    LIKE LINE OF my_data_input_bufferx,
        l_buffered    TYPE sy-subrc,
        l_data_old    TYPE exkn,
        l_data_oldx   TYPE mepoaccounting_datax,
        l_data_newx   TYPE mepoaccounting_datax,
        l_indx        TYPE sy-tabix.      "1478013
*PROTECT EQ 'X'
CHECK my_state->protect EQ mmpur_no.
Edited by: Tom Matys on Dec 12, 2011 10:55 AM

Your PO release strategy must have been based on Cost Center as one of characteristics.
Pl check & confirm.
Regards
Bhavesh Mistry

Purchase Requisition Creation From Release

Dear PM Gurus,
For Manual material availability Check to work before release, the Purchase Requisition check is to be set to Immediately in SPRO-> Define Change Docs and Collective PR or Activating Pr from Now On from Maintenance Order. The issue is that I want to restrict the creation of Purchase Requisition to Release of Maintenance Order but what is happening is upon saving the Maintenance Order, the PRs for all non stock materials are created and I also want the manual availability check to work before release.
Simplifying above details:
I want Manual material availability check to work and PR generation from release both in my Maintenance Order to work..
Regards..

Hi DP Singh,
I had seen the configuration settings that you are telling me but you see the Problem is:
If in Define Change Docs, Collective Purc. Req. Indicator, Operation No. Interval, you define the Res/PReq Indicator as Immediately, then the Manual Material Availability Check would work accurately but upon saving the Order, System would generate the Purchase Requisition.
and If in Define Change Docs, Collective Purc. Req. Indicator, Operation No. Interval, you define the Res/Preq Indicator as From Release, then the Manual Material Availability Check would not work as no material is as such MRP relevant till the time of releasing the Order but the Purchase Requisition would be created only when the Order is released.
Now What I want is both the Manual Availability Check to work and Purchase Requisition Creation From Release, but this is not possible according to the Standard SAP System. A workaround could be that I configure the automatic material availability upon release and configure the Res/Preq indicator as From Release, that way the material availability would be checked when the order is released and Purchase Requisitions would also be created from Release but still the Manual Availability Check would not work.
The Ideal Solution should have been configuring the Res/Purchase Requisition Indicator for all Non Stock Materials to be From Release and the Res/ Purchase Requisition Indicator for all Stock Materials to be Immediately. This way your manual availability Check would work for all Stock Materials and Purchase Requisition for all Non Stock materials would only be created upon Release. But this But still this is an ideal solution not the actual solution for standard SAP does not give you the flexibility to do such a setting in customizing or using Enhancement.
The Work Around Solution given by SAP is as follows: The system provides the following workaround:
After you change the indicator for materials planning-relevance to
"immediately" you can execute the availability check as required. You must
not save the order or network.
Regards,
Muhammad Usman Kahoot
Edited by: Usman Kahoot on May 27, 2010 1:32 PM

How to de-activate Qty and Price fields for Service purchase requisition

Dear all,
We have a request to de-activate (leave it as "Display") the fields of quantity and gross price when changing a service purchase requisition of a specific document type.
In example: We want that purchase requisition type NB, allows in change mode (ME52 or ME52N) to change the quantity and gross price of the services. On the other hand, these two fields must be only visible for order type ZNB. Besides this must be happening only for services.
Changing PT9 or PT9B will affect also the creation, and if we only configure based on transacction and document type does not work.
Any help will be highly appreciatted.
Cheers

Hi,
You may have to write a output requirement routine and assign the same to the output type in NACE.
But i don't think you will get the old and new data of Purchase order in requirement routine (program : SAPLV61B). You may have to export the data into memory from either a BADI method or User exit and then import the same in requirement routine.
Regards
Vinod

PO creation from One Purchase Requisition

Dear all;
In standard SAP We can create multiple PO from A single PReq ,though the full quantity of PReq is taken first time of PO creation .Is there any restriction that After full use PReq quantity no one can use the same PReq for further PO creation.
Thanking You;
Regards;
Joydeep Mukherjee

Dear Joydeep,
In contrast to a purchase requisition, it is possible to create more than one PO in reference to a RFQ.
A RFQ only gives information about the price for which can be ordered from a vendor. The system does therefore not reject you from ordering again from the same vendor with the best conditions.
Once you create a PO with reference to an RFQ, if the quantity in PR to which the RFQ is refering is exhausted,
the user is prevented from creating further PO only with reference to the PR. But the user can create Purchase orders refering to a RFQ as long as the validity period of the RFQ is still valid.
Regards,
ian, Wong Loke Foong

Workflow Purchase Requisition

Dear Friends,
we activated WS00000038 Workflow for requisition release. But we have a problem in this condition; if the initiator is approver in any step, purchase req must be approved automatically. How can we do?
Thanks.

Hi,
I guess you are looking at creating a custom workflow, a copy of WS00000038 would be a good start. This custom WF would have additonal step to check if the next approver is the initiator and if true do a background step by calling the "Release" method from the object "BUS2009-Purchase requisition item".
Remember to change workflow starting event to your custom WF to avoid multiple WF instances.
Viren.

Approval at purchase requisition level only

Hi Experts,
We want approval only at purchase requisition level and once PR is approved, PO should be created without any approval. I know we can make it happen by having release streategy at PR level and remove any release streatgy at PO level.
Please let me know if this process is OK and if someone has done similar kind of approcah. Also please advise what things we should take care while taking this approach.
Regards,
KS

It is actually a better business process to approve the purchase requisitions, but many businesses have a problem with this because historically managers manually signing the purchase order and want to replicate the legacy processes. Typically the purchase requisition is approved as the maximum price that can be paid, the purchasing personal then convert to a purchase order for this value or less.
You will need to take care of any restrictions that you wish to have on the purchasing personal when converting purchase requisitions, i.e. changing quantity, prices, fixed vendors, etc.

Click a line in query created from SQ01 - Purchase requisition.

Hi all,
my problem is: Tcode SQ01, i've created a query where query's fields are:
purchase order,
purchase requisition,
maintenance order.
In change query phase, menu Goto --> Report assignment
i've choosed two standard Tcode:
IW32
ME53N
so that when i click a line of my query and chose iw32 i really can change the order clicked on my query but when i choose ME53n i can only display the last purchase requisition displayed e not that I really clicked on my query!
So, how can i display the purchase requisition clicked on my query?
Are there someone help me?
Thanks a lots,
Alex.

Hi Phyllis,
I face the same problem that Alessandro and I've changed the report assignment to the old transaction ME53. Unfortunately, when I click in the purchase requisition the new ME53N is called instead of ME53.
Do you have any idea why is this happening?
Thanks in advance for any help.
Regards,
Sara

Combining multiple planned orders into single purchase requisition

Hi Gurus,
could anyone please tell me how to convert multiple planned orders generated during MRP run into a single purchase requisition? Also, is there any other way of getting single purchase requisition fcreated after MRP run for a procured item which is part of multiple BOMs?
Thanks and regards,
Abhik

Hi,
Conversion of Multiple planned order to single Purchase requisition is not possible.
But you can have a single Pur.Req for Multiple requirements.
You can do this by:
1. Individual/collective indicator "2" collective requirements for the Header Material so that you will get your dependent requirements clubbed together.
2. Period Lot sizing : Daily/weekly/monthly Lot size so that system will club the entire period requirements and propose a single lot.
3. for low value materials you can have Reorder Point planning also.
Hope this helps..
Regards,
Siva

Convertion of planned order into Purchase Requisition

Hi,
I have a planned order with Qty 50 (I have checked in MD16 it says qty:50)
Scenario 1:
I converted it to Purchase Requisition with qty.40, with change in qty. 10 numbers. After converting with qty. difference, I checked it in MD16, it say the qty as 10.
Scenario 2:
I converted it to Purchase Requisition with qty.60, with change in qty. 10 numbers. After converting with qty. difference, I checked it in MD16, I never find that Planned order in the list.
Now my questions are:
1. In which table this difference will be stored?
2. Or is there any t-code to see this Pl. order and PR qty. difference?
3. with respect to the second scenario why the planned order is not listed if i put more qty. in Purchase requisition than in the planned order?
4. Is there any setting to be done in IMG?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Dhan
9600934854
Edited by: DHANAVEL SUNDARAM on Feb 23, 2011 5:20 PM

Hi
Planned order are just like PR assume that if you have PR of 100 Qty but still you can do PO more then of PR Qty.
In the same way in case of planned order either you can convert it to PR or Production/process Order it behaves in the same manner.
Planned order data will be stored in table PLAF but once planned order deleted or converted it will not be in any table
You can fetch the deleted planned order data or converted planned order data.
But still you can go to individual PR to see the reference of Planned order no there.

MM - Purchase Requisition Conversion

Hi everyone,
When I'm creating a Purchase Requisition, the systems gives a valuation price.
When I'm converting the same Purchase Requisition to Purchase Order, the systems tells me that "Net Price must be greater than 0".
I would like the Purchase Order to take the valuation price proposed in the Purchase Requisition as the Net Price.
Does anyone has an idea on how to do that ?
Best Regards,
Remi

Hi,
You can check below link, here the solution is explained in detail via screenshots
[http://www.kowboyz.nl/blog/copy-price-purchase-requisition-purchase-order/|http://www.kowboyz.nl/blog/copy-price-purchase-requisition-purchase-order/]
i don't feel the need to write it allover again
Reg
Dheeraj

Backend Purchase Requisition - is it possible to change price?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for